A unified approximate reasoning theory suitable for both propositional calculus system \mathcal{L}^* and predicate calculus system \mathcal{K}^*

The concepts of metric R ₀-algebra and Hilbert cube of type R ₀ are introduced. A unified approximate reasoning theory in propositional caculus system $\mathcal{L}^* $ and predicate calculus system $\mathcal{K}^* $ is established semantically as well as syntactically, and a unified complete theorem is obtained.     

On the limits of refinement-testing for model-checking CSP

Refinement-checking, as embodied in tools like FDR, PAT and ProB, is a popular approach for model-checking refinement-closed predicates of CSP processes. We consider the limits of this approach to model-checking these kinds of predicates. By adopting Clarkson and Schneider’s hyperproperties framework, we show that every refinement-closed denotational predicate of finitely-nondeterministic, divergence-free CSP processes can be written as the conjunction of a safety predicate and the refinement-closure of a liveness predicate. We prove that every safety predicate is refinement-closed and that the safety predicates correspond precisely to the CSP refinement checks in finite linear observations models whose left-hand sides (i.e. specification processes) are independent of the systems to which they are applied. We then show that there exist important liveness predicates whose refinement-closures cannot be expressed as refinement checks in any finite linear observations model ${\mathcal{M}}$ , divergence-strict model ${\mathcal{M}^\Downarrow}$ or non-divergence-strict divergence-recording model ${\mathcal{M}^\#}$ , i.e. in any standard CSP model suitable for reasoning about the kinds of processes that FDR can handle, namely finitely-branching ones. These liveness predicates include liveness properties under intuitive fairness assumptions, branching-time liveness predicates and non-causation predicates for reasoning about authority. We conclude that alternative verification approaches, besides refinement-checking, currently under development for CSP should be further pursued.     

On matrices, automata, and double counting in constraint programming

Matrix models are ubiquitous for constraint problems. Many such problems have a matrix of variables $\mathcal{M}$ , with the same constraint C defined by a finite-state automaton $\mathcal{A}$ on each row of $\mathcal{M}$ and a global cardinality constraint $\mathit{gcc}$ on each column of $\mathcal{M}$ . We give two methods for deriving, by double counting, necessary conditions on the cardinality variables of the $\mathit{gcc}$ constraints from the automaton $\mathcal{A}$ . The first method yields linear necessary conditions and simple arithmetic constraints. The second method introduces the cardinality automaton, which abstracts the overall behaviour of all the row automata and can be encoded by a set of linear constraints. We also provide a domain consistency filtering algorithm for the conjunction of lexicographic ordering constraints between adjacent rows of $\mathcal{M}$ and (possibly different) automaton constraints on the rows. We evaluate the impact of our methods in terms of runtime and search effort on a large set of nurse rostering problem instances.     

Delayed theory combination vs. Nelson-Oppen for satisfiability modulo theories: a comparative analysis

Most state-of-the-art approaches for Satisfiability Modulo Theories $(SMT(\mathcal{T}))$ rely on the integration between a SAT solver and a decision procedure for sets of literals in the background theory $\mathcal{T} (\mathcal{T}{\text {-}}solver)$ . Often $\mathcal{T}$ is the combination $\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2$ of two (or more) simpler theories $(SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2))$ , s.t. the specific ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ must be combined. Up to a few years ago, the standard approach to $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ was to integrate the SAT solver with one combined $\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2{\text {-}}solver$ , obtained from two distinct ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ by means of evolutions of Nelson and Oppen’s (NO) combination procedure, in which the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ deduce and exchange interface equalities. Nowadays many state-of-the-art SMT solvers use evolutions of a more recent $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ procedure called Delayed Theory Combination (DTC), in which each ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solver$ interacts directly and only with the SAT solver, in such a way that part or all of the (possibly very expensive) reasoning effort on interface equalities is delegated to the SAT solver itself. In this paper we present a comparative analysis of DTC vs. NO for $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ . On the one hand, we explain the advantages of DTC in exploiting the power of modern SAT solvers to reduce the search. On the other hand, we show that the extra amount of Boolean search required to the SAT solver can be controlled. In fact, we prove two novel theoretical results, for both convex and non-convex theories and for different deduction capabilities of the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ , which relate the amount of extra Boolean search required to the SAT solver by DTC with the number of deductions and case-splits required to the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ by NO in order to perform the same tasks: (i) under the same hypotheses of deduction capabilities of the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ required by NO, DTC causes no extra Boolean search; (ii) using ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ with limited or no deduction capabilities, the extra Boolean search required can be reduced down to a negligible amount by controlling the quality of the $\mathcal{T}$ -conflict sets returned by the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ .     

Cauchy index computation

Computing the Cauchy index of a rational fractionQ/P betweena andb is important in most of the basic algorithms of real algebraic geometry: real root counting, exact sign determination, Routh-Hurwitz problem, signature of a Hankel matrix. One way to compute the Cauchy index ofQ/P is to compute some variant of the Euclidean remainder sequence ofP andQ and to compute the signs of the successive remainders evaluated ata andb. So, we want to compute efficiently the signs of the polynomials in the Euclidean remainder sequence evaluated at a given point. In the first part of the paper, we are only interested in counting arithmetic operations and comparisons. For input polynomials of degrees bounded byd we design an algorithm with complexity $O(\mathcal{M}(d)\log (d + 1))$ for computing the Cauchy index based on the strategy of a known efficient algorithm for computing a GCD; here $\mathcal{M}(d)$ denotes the cost of multiplying polynomials of degree at mostd. One has $\mathcal{M}(d) = O(d\log (d + 1))$ if the coefficient field allows Fourier transform, and $\mathcal{M}(d) = O(d\log (d + 1)\log \log (d + 2))$ otherwise. In the second part of the paper we are interested in the bit complexity when the coefficients ofP andQ are integers of size τ. A better way to compute the Cauchy index is then to evaluate the values of some variant of the subresultants rather than the values of the remainders. For polynomials of bit size τ we design an algorithm with bit complexity $O(\mathcal{M}(d,\sigma )\log (d + 1))$ with σ=O(dτ) where $\mathcal{M}(d,\sigma ) = O(d\sigma \cdot \log (d\sigma ) \cdot \log \log (d\sigma ))$ is Schönhage’s bound for multiplication of integer polynomials of degrees bounded byd and bit sizes bounded by σ in the multitape Turing machine model. So our bound isO(d ²τ·log(dτ)·log log(dτ)·log(d+1)). The same bound holds for computing the signature of a regular Hankel matrix. Our analysis shows a new and natural exact divisibility for subresultants.     

Rounds in Combinatorial Search

A set system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq2^{[m]}$ is said to be separating if for every pair of distinct elements x,y∈[m] there exists a set $H\in\mathcal{H}$ such that H contains exactly one of them. The search complexity of a separating system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq 2^{[m]}$ is the minimum number of questions of type “x∈H?” (where $H \in\mathcal{H}$ ) needed in the worst case to determine a hidden element x∈[m]. If we receive the answer before asking a new question then we speak of the adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ ; if the questions are all fixed beforehand then we speak of the non-adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H})$ . If we are allowed to ask the questions in at most k rounds then we speak of the k-round complexity of $\mathcal{H}$ , denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H})$ . It is clear that $|\mathcal{H}| \geq\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c}_{1} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\mathrm{c}_{2} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\cdots\geq\mathrm{c}_{m} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ . A group of problems raised by G.O.H. Katona is to characterize those separating systems for which some of these inequalities are tight. In this paper we are discussing set systems $\mathcal{H}$ with the property $|\mathcal{H}| = \mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H}) $ for any k≥3. We give a necessary condition for this property by proving a theorem about traces of hypergraphs which also has its own interest.     

Parallel black box \mathcal {H}-LU preconditioning for elliptic boundary value problems

Hierarchical ( $\mathcal {H}$ -) matrices provide a data-sparse way to approximate fully populated matrices. The two basic steps in the construction of an $\mathcal {H}$ -matrix are (a) the hierarchical construction of a matrix block partition, and (b) the blockwise approximation of matrix data by low rank matrices. In the context of finite element discretisations of elliptic boundary value problems, $\mathcal {H}$ -matrices can be used for the construction of preconditioners such as approximate $\mathcal {H}$ -LU factors. In this paper, we develop a new black box approach to construct the necessary partition. This new approach is based on the matrix graph of the sparse stiffness matrix and no longer requires geometric data associated with the indices like the standard clustering algorithms. The black box clustering and a subsequent $\mathcal {H}$ -LU factorisation have been implemented in parallel, and we provide numerical results in which the resulting black box $\mathcal {H}$ -LU factorisation is used as a preconditioner in the iterative solution of the discrete (three-dimensional) convection-diffusion equation.     

On the class of λ-statistically convergent difference sequences of fuzzy numbers

In this study, we introduce the sets $\left[ V,\lambda ,p\right] _{\Updelta }^{{\mathcal{F}}},\left[ C,1,p\right] _{\Updelta }^{{\mathcal{F}}}$ and examine their relations with the classes of $ S_{\lambda }\left( \Updelta ,{\mathcal{F}}\right)$ and $ S_{\mu }\left( \Updelta ,{\mathcal{F}}\right)$ of sequences for the sequences $\left( \lambda _{n}\right)$ and $\left( \mu _{n}\right) , 0<p<\infty $ and difference sequences of fuzzy numbers.     

Integrated damping parameter and control design in structural systems for \bf{\mathcal{H}^2} and {\mathcal{H}^{\infty}} specifications

The paper presents a linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based approach for the simultaneous optimal design of output feedback control gains and damping parameters in structural systems with collocated actuators and sensors. The proposed integrated design is based on simplified $\mathcal{H}^2$ and $\mathcal{H}^{\infty}$ norm upper bound calculations for collocated structural systems. Using these upper bound results, the combined design of the damping parameters of the structural system and the output feedback controller to satisfy closed-loop $\mathcal{H}^2$ or $\mathcal{H}^{\infty}$ performance specifications is formulated as an LMI optimization problem with respect to the unknown damping coefficients and feedback gains. Numerical examples motivated from structural and aerospace engineering applications demonstrate the advantages and computational efficiency of the proposed technique for integrated structural and control design. The effectiveness of the proposed integrated design becomes apparent, especially in very large scale structural systems where the use of classical methods for solving Lyapunov and Riccati equations associated with $\mathcal{H}^2$ and $\mathcal{H}^{\infty}$ designs are time-consuming or intractable.     

Interval methods that are guaranteed to underestimate (and the resulting new justification of Kaucher arithmetic)

One of the main objectives of interval computations is, given the functionf(x ₁, ...,x _n ), andn intervals $\bar x_1 ,...,\bar x_n$ , to compute the range $\bar y = f(\bar x_1 ,...,\bar x_n )$ . Traditional methods of interval arithmetic compute anenclosure $Y \supseteq \bar y$ for the desired interval $\bar y$ , an enclosure that is often an overestimation. It is desirable to know how close this enclosure is to the desired range interval. For that purpose, we develop a new interval formalism that produces not only the enclosure, but also theinner estimate for the desired range $\bar y$ , i.e., an interval y such that $y \subseteq \bar y$ . The formulas for this new method turn out to be similar to the formulas of Kaucher arithmetic. Thus, we get a new justification for Kaucher arithmetic.     

Generalising Unit-Refutation Completeness and SLUR via Nested Input Resolution

The class ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ (Single Lookahead Unit Resolution) was introduced in Schlipf et al. (Inf Process Lett 54:133–137, 1995) as an umbrella class for efficient (poly-time) SAT solving, with linear-time SAT decision, while the recognition problem was not considered. ?epek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) extended this class in various ways to hierarchies covering all of CNF (all clause-sets). We introduce a hierarchy ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ which we argue is the natural “limit” of such approaches. The second source for our investigations is the class ${\mathcal{UC}}$ of unit-refutation complete clause-sets, introduced in del Val (1994) as a target class for knowledge compilation. Via the theory of “hardness” of clause-sets as developed in Kullmann (1999), Kullmann (Ann Math Artif Intell 40(3–4):303–352, 2004) and Ansótegui et al. (2008) we obtain a natural generalisation ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ , containing those clause-sets which are “unit-refutation complete of level k”, which is the same as having hardness at most k. Utilising the strong connections to (tree-)resolution complexity and (nested) input resolution, we develop basic methods for the determination of hardness (the level k in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ ). A fundamental insight now is that ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k = {\mathcal{UC}}_k$ holds for all k. We can thus exploit both streams of intuitions and methods for the investigations of these hierarchies. As an application we can easily show that the hierarchies from ?epek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) are strongly subsumed by ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ . Finally we consider the problem of “irredundant” clause-sets in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ . For 2-CNF we show that strong minimisations are possible in polynomial time, while already for (very special) Horn clause-sets minimisation is NP-complete. We conclude with an extensive discussion of open problems and future directions. We envisage the concepts investigated here to be the starting point for a theory of good SAT translations, which brings together the good SAT-solving aspects from ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ together with the knowledge-representation aspects from ${\mathcal{UC}}$ , and expands this combination via notions of “hardness”.     

Order optimal information spreading using algebraic gossip

In this paper we study gossip based information spreading with bounded message sizes. We use algebraic gossip to disseminate $k$ distinct messages to all $n$ nodes in a network. For arbitrary networks we provide a new upper bound for uniform algebraic gossip of $O((k+\log n + D)\varDelta )$ rounds with high probability, where $D$ and $\varDelta $ are the diameter and the maximum degree in the network, respectively. For many topologies and selections of $k$ this bound improves previous results, in particular, for graphs with a constant maximum degree it implies that uniform gossip is order optimal and the stopping time is $\varTheta (k + D)$ . To eliminate the factor of $\varDelta $ from the upper bound we propose a non-uniform gossip protocol, TAG, which is based on algebraic gossip and an arbitrary spanning tree protocol $\mathcal{S } $ . The stopping time of TAG is $O(k+\log n +d(\mathcal{S })+t(\mathcal{S }))$ , where $t(\mathcal{S })$ is the stopping time of the spanning tree protocol, and $d(\mathcal{S })$ is the diameter of the spanning tree. We provide two general cases in which this bound leads to an order optimal protocol. The first is for $k=\varOmega (n)$ , where, using a simple gossip broadcast protocol that creates a spanning tree in at most linear time, we show that TAG finishes after $\varTheta (n)$ rounds for any graph. The second uses a sophisticated, recent gossip protocol to build a fast spanning tree on graphs with large weak conductance. In turn, this leads to the optimally of TAG on these graphs for $k=\varOmega (\text{ polylog }(n))$ . The technique used in our proofs relies on queuing theory, which is an interesting approach that can be useful in future gossip analysis.     

A connection between the Cantor–Bendixson derivative and the well-founded semantics of finite logic programs

Results of Schlipf (J Comput Syst Sci 51:64?C86, 1995) and Fitting (Theor Comput Sci 278:25?C51, 2001) show that the well-founded semantics of a finite predicate logic program can be quite complex. In this paper, we show that there is a close connection between the construction of the perfect kernel of a $\Pi^0_1$ class via the iteration of the Cantor?CBendixson derivative through the ordinals and the construction of the well-founded semantics for finite predicate logic programs via Van Gelder??s alternating fixpoint construction. This connection allows us to transfer known complexity results for the perfect kernel of $\Pi^0_1$ classes to give new complexity results for various questions about the well-founded semantics ${\mathit{wfs}}(P)$ of a finite predicate logic program P.     

Integrating answer set programming and constraint logic programming

We introduce a knowledge representation language ${\cal AC(C)}$ extending the syntax and semantics of ASP and CR-Prolog, give some examples of its use, and present an algorithm, $\mathcal{AC}\!solver$ , for computing answer sets of ${\cal AC(C)}$ programs. The algorithm does not require full grounding of a program and combines “classical” ASP solving methods with constraint logic programming techniques and CR-Prolog based abduction. The ${\cal AC(C)}$ based approach often allows to solve problems which are impossible to solve by more traditional ASP solving techniques. We believe that further investigation of the language and development of more efficient and reliable solvers for its programs can help to substantially expand the domain of applicability of the answer set programming paradigm.     

Outsourcing shortest distance computing with privacy protection

With the advent of cloud computing, it becomes desirable to outsource graphs into cloud servers to efficiently perform complex operations without compromising their sensitive information. In this paper, we take the shortest distance computation as a case to investigate the technique issues in outsourcing graph operations. We first propose a parameter-free, edge-based 2-HOP delegation security model (shorten as 2-HOP delegation model), which can greatly reduce the chances of the structural pattern attack and the graph reconstruction attack. We then transform the original graph into a link graph $G_l$ kept locally and a set of outsourced graphs $\mathcal G _o$ . Our objectives include (i) ensuring each outsourced graph meeting the requirement of 2-HOP delegation model, (ii) making shortest distance queries be answered using $G_l$ and $\mathcal G _o$ , (iii) minimizing the space cost of $G_l$ . We devise a greedy method to produce $G_l$ and $\mathcal G _o$ , which can exactly answer shortest distance queries. We also develop an efficient transformation method to support approximate shortest distance answering under a given average additive error bound. The experimental results illustrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.     

Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar

It is proved that Yablo’s paradox and the Liar paradox are equiparadoxical, in the sense that their paradoxicality is based upon exactly the same circularity condition—for any frame ${\mathcal{K}}$ , the following are equivalent: (1) Yablo’s sequence leads to a paradox in ${\mathcal{K}}$ ; (2) the Liar sentence leads to a paradox in ${\mathcal{K}}$ ; (3) ${\mathcal{K}}$ contains odd cycles. This result does not conflict with Yablo’s claim that his sequence is non-self-referential. Rather, it gives Yablo’s paradox a new significance: his construction contributes a method by which we can eliminate the self-reference of a paradox without changing its circularity condition.