Ultrastructure and distribution of axon terminals from the reticular thalamic nucleus to the anteroventral thalamic nucleus of the rat

The Bard Atherectomy Catheter is a new rotational atherectomy device that consists of a flexible, hollow, thin-walled cutting catheter that, while rotated at 1,500 revolutions per minute, is advanced across the lesion over a special spiral guidewire system. We report the initial clinical experience with this device in 20 peripheral lesions in ten patients. The majority of patients were treated for limb salvage. All lesions were successfully intervened on by atherectomy followed by adjunctive balloon angioplasty. A reduction to less than 50% stenosis was achieved in 13 of the 20 lesions (65%) after atherectomy but in all 20 lesions (100%) after adjunctive angioplasty for all lesions and stenting for dissections in two. Baseline minimal lesion lumen diameter was 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm with a reference vessel diameter of 4.2 +/- 1.7 mm (75 +/- 21% stenosis). The lumen improved to 2.0 +/- 0.8 mm (45 +/- 19% stenosis) (P < 0.001) following atherectomy and to 3.9 +/- 1.9 mm (13 +/- 16% stenosis) (P < 0.001) after adjunctive angioplasty. The average weight of removed atheroma was 45 +/- 58 mg. All ten patients had initial improvement in symptoms. At 6 months follow-up there was persistent improvement in eight patients and two subjects had undergone amputations. Our early clinical experience with this low profile, flexible atherectomy device, that enables extraction of a large amount of atheroma, suggests that it will become a valuable addition to current atherectomy technologies in small- and medium-sized vessels. The value of this device in coronary vessels is under investigation.     

Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. METHODS: Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16+/-15% vs. 33+/-17% in the parent vessel, and 6+/-15% vs. 39+/-22% in the side branch; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter >2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.     

Excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty in functional and total coronary occlusions

Registries of excimer laser coronary angioplasty have reported good results in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease, including total or subtotal coronary occlusions. One hundred three patients (103 lesions) with a functional or total coronary occlusion were included in a randomized trial (Amsterdam-Rotterdam [AMRO] trial, total of 308 patients), 49 patients were allocated to laser angioplasty and 54 patients to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical end points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeated coronary angioplasty of the randomized segment during a 6-month follow-up period. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by an automated contour-detection algorithm. Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in all procedures. The angiographic success rate was 65% in patients treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with 61% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. No deaths occurred. There were no significant differences between the laser angioplasty group and the balloon angioplasty group in the incidence of myocardial infarctions (1 patient vs 3, respectively, p = 0.36), coronary bypass surgery (4 patients vs 2, respectively, p = 0.34), repeat angioplasty (10 patients vs 8, respectively, p = 0.46) or primary clinical end point (15 patients vs 12, respectively, p = 0.34). The net gain in minimal lumen diameter and restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) were 0.81 +/- 0.74 mm and 66.7%, respectively, in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 1.04 +/- 0.68 mm and 48.5%, respectively, in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (p = 0.59 and p = 0.15, respectively). Excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty demonstrated no benefit over balloon angioplasty with respect to initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of patients with functional or total coronary occlusions of >10 mm in length.     

Bovine endometrial retinol-binding protein secretion, messenger ribonucleic acid expression, and cellular localization during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and efficacy of stent placement in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and renal artery stenoses, which are difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Preliminary experience with stent placement suggests improved results over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Balloon-expandable stents were placed in 100 consecutive patients (133 renal arteries) with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Sixty-seven of the patients had unilateral renal artery stenosis treated and 33 had bilateral renal artery stenoses treated with stents placed in both renal arteries. RESULTS: Angiographic success, as determined by quantitative angiography, was obtained in 132 (99%) of 133 lesions. Early clinical success was achieved in 76% of the patients. Six months after stent placement, the systolic blood pressure was reduced from 173 +/- 25 to 147 +/- 23 mm Hg (p < 0.001); the diastolic pressure from 88 +/- 17 to 76 +/- 12 mm Hg (p < 0.001); and the mean number of antihypertensive medications per patient from 2.6 +/- 1 to 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8.7 +/- 5.0 months in 67 patients revealed restenosis (>50% diameter narrowing) in 15 (19%) of 80 stented vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is an effective treatment for renovascular hypertension, with a low angiographic restenosis rate. Stent placement appears to be a very attractive therapy in patients with lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty such as renal aorto-ostial lesions and restenotic lesions, as well as after a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result.     

Mechanisms of luminal enlargement and quantification of vessel wall trauma following balloon coronary angioplasty and directional atherectomy

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the dual action of lumen enlargement and vessel wall damage following either balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy, using intracoronary ultrasound, and angioscopy. BACKGROUND: Differences in the mechanisms of action of balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy may have a significant bearing on the immediate outcome and the restenosis rate at 6 months. METHODS: A total of 36 patients were studied before and after either balloon angioplasty (n = 18) or directional atherectomy (n = 18). Ultrasound measurements included changes in lumen area, external elastic membrane area and plaque burden. In addition, the presence and extent of dissections were assessed to derive a damage score. Angioscopic assessment of the dilated or atherectomized stenotic lesions was translated into semi-quantitative dissection, thrombus and haemorrhage scores. RESULTS: Atherectomy patients had a larger angiographic vessel size compared with the angioplasty group (3.55 +/- 0.46 mm vs 3.00 +/- 0.64 mm, P < 0.05); however, minimal lumen diameter (1.18 +/- 0.96 mm vs 0.85 +/- 0.49 mm) and plaque burden (17.04 +/- 3.69 vs 15.23 +/- 4.92 mm2) measurements did not differ significantly. As a result of plaque reduction, atherectomy produced a larger increase in luminal area than the angioplasty group (5.80 +/- 1.78 mm2 vs 2.44 +/- 1.36 mm2, P < 0.0001). Lumen increase after angioplasty was the result of 'plaque compression' (50%) and wall stretching (50%). Additionally, in both groups there was indirect angioscopic evidence of thrombus 'microembolization' as an adjunctive mechanism of lumen enlargement. Angioscopy identified big flaps in six and small intimal flaps in 11 of the atherectomized patients as compared with five and 12 patients in the angioplasty group. Changes in thrombus score following both coronary interventions were identical (0.72 +/- 3.42 points atherectomy vs -0.38 +/- 3.27 points balloon angioplasty, ns). CONCLUSIONS: Lumen enlargement after directional atherectomy is mainly achieved by plaque removal (87%), whereas balloon dilation is the result of vessel wall stretching (50%) and plaque reduction (50%). Despite the fact that the luminal gain achieved by directional atherectomy is twice that achieved with balloon angioplasty, the extent of trauma induced by both techniques seems to be similar.     

Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.     

Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty in patients with new coronary lesions. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to determine whether intracoronary stenting, as compared with standard balloon angioplasty, reduces the recurrence of luminal narrowing in restenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who had undergone at least one balloon angioplasty and who had clinical and angiographic evidence of restenosis after the procedure were randomly assigned to undergo standard balloon angioplasty (192 patients) or intracoronary stenting with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (191 patients). The primary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis (defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter) at six months. The secondary end points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and revascularization of the target vessel. RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the angioplasty group than in the stent group (32 percent as compared with 18 percent, P= 0.03). Revascularization of the target vessel at six months was required in 27 percent of the angioplasty group but in only 10 percent of the stent group (P=0.001). This difference resulted from a smaller mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter in the angioplasty group (1.85+/-0.56 mm) than in the stent group (2.04+/-0.66 mm), with a mean difference of 0.19 mm (P=0.01) at follow-up. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 0.6 percent of the angioplasty group and in 3.9 percent of the stent group. The rate of event-free survival at 250 days was 72 percent in the angioplasty group and 84 percent in the stent group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Elective coronary stenting was effective in the treatment of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Stenting resulted in a lower rate of recurrent stenosis despite a higher incidence of subacute thrombosis.     

Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups

With the increasing clinical application of new devices for percutaneous coronary revascularization, maximization of the acute angiographic result has become widely recognized as a key factor in maintained clinical and angiographic success. What is unclear, however, is whether the specific mode of action of different devices might exert an additional independent effect on late luminal renarrowing. The purpose of this study was to investigate such a difference in the degree of provocation of luminal renarrowing (or 'restenosis propensity') by different devices, among 3660 patients, who had 4342 lesions successfully treated by balloon angioplasty (n = 3797), directional coronary atherectomy (n = 200), Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (n = 229) or excimer laser coronary angioplasty (n = 116) and who also underwent quantitative angiographic analysis pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. To allow valid comparisons between the groups, because of significant differences in coronary vessel size (balloon angioplasty = 2.62 +/- 0.55 mm, directional coronary atherectomy = 3.28 +/- 0.62 mm, excimer laser coronary angioplasty = 2.51 +/- 0.47 mm, Palmaz-Schatz = 3.01 +/- 0.44 mm; P < 0.0001), the comparative measurements of interest selected were the 'relative loss' in luminal diameter (RLoss = loss/vessel size) to denote the restenosis process, and the 'relative lumen at follow-up' (RLfup = minimal luminal diameter at follow up/vessel size) to represent the angiographic outcome. For consistency, lesion severity pre-intervention was represented by the 'relative lumen pre' (RLpre = minimal luminal diameter pre/vessel size) and the luminal increase at intervention was measured as 'relative gain' (relative gain = gain/ vessel size). Differences in restenosis propensity between devices was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate models were constructed to determine relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up, taking account of relative lumen pre-intervention, lesion location, relative gain, vessel size and the device used. In addition, model-estimated relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up at given relative lumen pre-intervention relative gain and vessel size, were compared among the four groups. Significant differences were detected among the groups both with respect to these estimates, as well as in the degree of influence of progressively increasing relative gain, on the extent of renarrowing (relative loss) and angiographic outcome (relative lumen at follow-up), particularly at higher levels of luminal increase (relative gain). Specifically, lesions treated by balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (the predominantly 'dilating' interventions) were associated with more favourable angiographic profiles than directional atherectomy or excimer laser (the mainly 'debulking' interventions). Significant effects of lesion severity and location, as well as the well known influence of luminal increase on both luminal renarrowing and late angiographic outcome were also noted. These findings indicate that propensity to restenosis after apparently successful intervention is influenced not only by the degree of luminal enlargement achieved at intervention, but by the device used to achieve it. In view of the clinical implications of such findings, further evaluation in larger randomized patient populations is warranted.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA in the rat prostate: detection and quantitation by competitive reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

Conventional balloon angioplasty treatment of aorto-ostial stenoses in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts is associated with a low primary success rate, a high complication rate and a high incidence of restenosis. The short-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions was compared with that of balloon angioplasty. Thirteen patients underwent stent implantation for 13 de novo lesions (four in the left main coronary trunk, two in the right coronary artery, seven in the vein graft) between January 1994 and December 1995. Fourteen patients underwent balloon angioplasty for 14 de novo lesions (five in the left main coronary trunk, four in the right coronary artery, five in the vein graft between January 1986 and April 1992. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Initial success was obtained in all patients in the stent group, compared with 71% of the balloon angioplasty group. Insufficient dilation was the main cause for such failure in the balloon angioplasty group. Baseline reference diameters were similar (3.40 +/- 0.65 mm in the stent group vs 3.36 +/- 0.42 mm in the balloon angioplasty group) and there was no difference in baseline minimal luminal diameter (1.41 +/- 0.74 vs 1.08 +/- 0.56 mm). Minimal luminal diameter was significantly greater in the stent group than in the balloon angioplasty group at both post-procedure and follow-up examinations (post: 3.36 +/- 0.58 vs 2.69 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.01; follow-up: 2.33 +/- 0.96 vs 1.52 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05). There was no subacute occlusion in either group. The overall angiographic restenosis rate (> 50% stenosis) was lower in the stent group (17%) than in the balloon angioplasty group: the restenosis rates of native lesions were 0% in the stent group and 40% in the balloon angioplasty group; those of saphenous vein graft lesions were 33% in the stent group and 50% in the balloon angioplasty group. Although the number of patients was limited, these results suggest that Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and effective strategy for treating aorto-ostial lesions in both native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.     

Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine whether oversized implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent provides a more favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in chronic total occlusions than does conventional coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis and reocclusion remain major limitations of balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Enforced mechanical remodeling by implantation of the oversized Wallstent may prevent elastic recoil and improve accommodation of intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Lumen dimension was measured by a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography system (CAAS II). These measurements (before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up) were compared between the groups with Wallstent implantation (20 lesions, 20 patients) and conventional balloon angioplasty (266 lesions, 249 patients) for treatment of chronic total occlusion. Acute gain (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that before intervention), late loss (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that at follow-up) and net gain (acute gain minus late loss) were examined. RESULTS: Wallstent deployment was successful in all patients. High pressure intra-Wallstent balloon inflation (mean +/- SD 14 +/- 3 atm) was performed in all lesions. Although vessel size did not differ between the Wallstent and balloon angioplasty groups, acute gain was significantly greater in the Wallstent group (2.96 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.34 mm, p < 0.0001). Although late loss was also significantly larger in the Wallstent group (0.81 +/- 0.95 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05), net gain was still significantly greater in this group (2.27 +/- 1.00 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.69 mm, p < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) occurred at 6 months in 29% of lesions in the Wallstent group and in 45% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5150). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the oversized Wallstent, with full coverage of the lesion length, ensures resetting of the vessel size to its original caliber before disease and allows greater accommodation of intimal hyperplasia and chronic vessel recoil. Wallstent implantation provides a more favorable short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than does conventional balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions.     

Influence of destruction of retina-RPE complex on the proliferation of scleral chondrocytes in chicks

BACKGROUND: Restenosis remains the major limitation of coronary angioplasty. Coronary stents have reduced the incidence of restenosis in selected patients with relatively large vessels. No strategies to date have demonstrated a beneficial effect in vessels < 3.0 mm in diameter. We have shown in the MultiVitamins and Probucol (MVP) Trial that probucol, a potent antioxidant, reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the benefit of probucol therapy is maintained in the subgroup of patients with smaller coronary vessels. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a subgroup of 189 patients included in the MVP trial who underwent successful balloon angioplasty of at least one coronary segment with a reference diameter < 3.0 mm. One month before angioplasty, patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: placebo, probucol (500 mg), multivitamins (beta-carotene 30000 IU, vitamin C 500 mg, and vitamin E 700 IU), or probucol plus multivitamins twice daily. The treatment was maintained until follow-up angiography was performed at 6 months. The mean reference diameter of this study population was 2.49+/-0.34 mm. Lumen loss was 0.12+/-0.34 mm for probucol, 0.25+/-0.43 mm for the combined treatment, 0.35+/-0.56 mm for vitamins, and 0.38+/-0.51 mm for placebo (P=.005 for probucol). Restenosis rates per segment were 20.0% for probucol, 28.6% for the combined treatment, 45.1% for vitamins, and 37.3% for placebo (P=.006 for probucol). CONCLUSIONS: Probucol reduces lumen loss and restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries.     

Procedural outcome and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty versus new device interventions for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses

Strategies for dilatation of bifurcation stenoses have continued to evolve over the past several years. However, there is limited experience on the efficacy of various nonballoon interventional devices and their results in comparison with balloon angioplasty. We, therefore, analysed our data in 72 patients of coronary artery disease with true bifurcation stenoses with balloon angioplasty or new device interventions (NDI). All patients underwent dilatation of both the primary vessel and side branch ostial stenosis. Balloon angioplasty using double guidewire with sequential or simultaneous (kissing balloon) balloon inflation in the two vessels was performed in 42 patients. Thirty patients underwent NDI, using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in 12, rotablation in 6 and elective coronary stents in 12 patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic variables between patients in the two groups. While the preprocedural luminal diameter stenosis was similar, the residual stenosis was significantly less, both in the primary vessel and side branch, after NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. The procedure was successful in 96.6 percent patients treated with NDI and 83.3 percent with balloon angioplasty (p < 0.01) with relief of obstruction in both branches without any major complications. Freedom from subsequent coronary events in the form of angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, bypass graft surgery of death was significantly more, both at 6 months (92% versus 65.6%, p < 0.001) and 12 months (81.8% versus 53.1%, p < 0.001) in the group of patients treated with NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. It is, therefore, concluded that NDI including DCA, rotablation and elective stenting are associated with higher rate of success, lesser complications and better event-free survival in comparison to balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses.     

Intestinal epithelial cell regulation of macrophage and lymphocyte interleukin 10 expression

Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty. Aim of the present study was to determine the in-hospital and long-term results of stent deployment in focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts. Thirty-five focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts in 31 patients were treated with stent deployment. Twenty-four patients (77%) had three vessels, 6 (20%) two vessels and 1 (3%) single vessel disease. Saphenous vein grafts aged 9.7 +/- 4.2 years (range 1-19 years). Twenty-two lesions (63%) were located within the body of the saphenous graft, 8 (23%) at the graft/coronary artery anastomosis and 5 (14%) at the aorta/graft anastomosis. The indications for stent deployment included: suboptimal result from balloon angioplasty (defined as > or = 50% post-angioplasty residual stenosis) in 29/35 lesions (83%); post-angioplasty coronary dissection with threatening occlusion in 4/35 (11%); abrupt closure in 2/35 (6%). Patients were screened for death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty during in-hospital stay and after a follow-up of 12 +/- 8 months. Even-free survival curve was constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Stent deployment was successful in all patients. One stent was deployed in 24/35 lesions (69%), half Palmaz-Schatz stent in 6/35 (17%) and 2 or more stents in 5/35 (14%). The balloon/vessel ratio resulted of 1.0 +/- 0.1 Minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.8 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.6 mm, with a mean gain of 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm (range 1.8-4.0 mm). During the in-hospital period 1 patient (3.2%) died and 1 (3.2%) had a non Q wave myocardial infarction. Therefore, the clinical success rate, was 94%. During the follow-up period, 2 patients died (6.9%), 2 (6.9%) developed a non Q wave myocardial infarction, 1 (3.4%) underwent bypass surgery and 3 (10.3%) underwent repeat angioplasty. The estimated 2-year event-free survival rate (free from myocardial infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) was 62%. In conclusion, Palmaz-Schatz stent deployment in focal, de novo vein grafts presents a high rate of procedural success, a low rate of acute complications and good long-term results.     

Directional coronary atherectomy for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. The results of balloon angioplasty have been disappointing due to the high recurrence of restenosis at follow-up. Debulking of the restenotic tissue within the stents using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) may offer a therapeutic advantage. We report the immediate clinical and angiographic outcomes and long-term clinical follow-up results of 45 patients (46 lesions), mean age 63+/-12 years, 73% men, with a mean reference diameter of 2.9+/-0.6 mm, treated with DCA for symptomatic Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. DCA was performed successfully in all 46 lesions and resulted in a postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of 2.7+/-0.7 mm and a residual diameter stenosis of 17+/-10%. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgeries. Four patients (9%) suffered a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Target lesion revascularization was 28.3% at a mean follow-up of 10+/-4.6 months. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and repeat target lesion revascularization) was 71.2% and 64.7% at 6 and 12 months after DCA, respectively. Thus, DCA is safe and efficacious for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. It results in a large postprocedural minimal luminal diameter and a low rate of both target lesion revascularization and combined major clinical events at follow-up.     

Comparisons of three simple nutritional assessments applied to patients with oral and maxillofacial malignancies

Percutaneous balloon angioplasty was used to dilate inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis in 12 patients with Budd Chiari syndrome. There were seven men and five women, aged 32.8 +/- 8.5 years. Angioplasty was performed using balloon 18-20 mm in diameter. In eleven (91.6%) patients, IVC could be successfully dilated. In these eleven patients, the caval diameter at the site of stenosis increased from 2.3 +/- 1.5 to 13.1 +/- 2.8 mm (p < 0.001), the mean IVC pressure decreased from 28.2 +/- 4.1 to 10.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.001) and the gradient across the stenosis decreased from 23.1 +/- 2.2 to 4.2 +/- 1.9 mmHg (p < 0.001). There was appreciable clinical improvement after angioplasty. On a mean followup of 10.8 (3-18) months four (36.4%) patients had restenosis which could be successfully dilated again. These results suggest that balloon dilatation of inferior vena cava stenosis is safe and effective, however, recurrence is common and needs redilatation.     

Coronary flow analysis during autoperfusion angioplasty

BACKGROUND: Autoperfusion balloons are available for the protection of the myocardium during balloon angioplasty. The aortic pressure is the driving force that delivers blood to the distal vessel during balloon inflation. Autoperfusion balloons can achieve sufficient flow rates in vitro. The use of these devices is recommended in high-risk patients in danger of haemodynamic collapse during balloon inflation. The quantity of the distal blood flow during balloon inflation in vivo is still unknown. OBJECTIVES: To measure distal coronary perfusion using Doppler guidewires during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with autoperfusion balloons. METHODS: Coronary flow velocity was measured with 0.014-inch Doppler guidewires bypassing the autoperfusion balloon in eight patients undergoing elective PTCA (degree of stenosis 74 +/- 7.2%). We used balloons with diameters of 3.0 and 3.5 mm. The coronary diameter at the location of the flow measurements was obtained by quantitative angiography in two planes. Coronary blood flow was calculated as the luminal area multiplied by the average peak flow velocity of the Doppler wire divided by 2. Coronary flow velocity reserve was measured before and after angioplasty by intracoronary injection of adenosine. RESULTS: Coronary blood flow was 35 +/- 11.6 ml/min before PTCA. During average inflation times of 4.6 +/- 0.9 min, coronary blood flow was 19 +/- 3.8 ml/min (P = 0.002) after withdrawing the guidewire in the autoperfusion balloon. Five minutes after angioplasty it increased to 42 +/- 13.5 ml/min (P < 0.001). Four patients had electrocardiographic changes during balloon inflation; three patients reported chest pain. One patient required a stent because of a local dissection. To achieve satisfactory angiographic results (residual stenosis 11 +/- 8.5%), we performed 2.1 +/- 0.78 inflations on average with a cumulative inflation time of 8.8 +/- 3.35 min. Coronary flow velocity reserve increased from 1.3 +/- 0.20 to 2.2 +/- 0.22 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the autoperfusion balloon we measured a coronary blood flow during angioplasty of 56 +/- 10.3% of the distal perfusion before PTCA. In high-risk patients dependent on adequate coronary perfusion, autoperfusion balloons are not able to provide sufficient distal coronary blood flow during balloon inflation. In these patients active coronary or circulatory support devices are recommended.     

Optimal burr and adjunctive balloon sizing reduces the need for target artery revascularization after coronary mechanical rotational atherectomy

We analyzed the effect of differing burr and balloon sizes during mechanical rotational atherectomy on the need for target vessel revascularization at 6 months. The ideal burr/artery ratio and adjunctive balloon/artery ratio for optimizing acute luminal results and minimizing restenosis is unknown. Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained in 311 patients (339 lesions) treated with rotational atherectomy from August 1993 to September 1994, to determine whether procedural results or technique were related to the need for target vessel revascularization. Target vessel revascularization, defined as repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery within 6 months after rotational atherectomy, occurred in 19% of patients. Larger burr/artery ratios, defined as the final burr size divided by the reference artery size, were correlated with decreased postatherectomy diameter stenosis (p <0.009) and decreased final diameter stenosis (p <0.03). However, there was no statistical association between postatherectomy or final diameter stenosis with need for revascularization (p = not significant [NS]). The need for revascularization was lowest for burr/artery ratio between 0.6 to 0.85 (15%) versus burr/artery <0.6 or >0.85 (25%) (p <0.04). Postatherectomy, smaller balloon/artery ratios, defined as the final balloon size divided by the reference artery size, were correlated with lower repeat revascularization rates. Balloon/artery ratios <0.95 (target vessel revascularization = 11% vs 25% in balloon/artery >0.95) were associated with the best luminal results and the least risk for clinical restenosis (p <0.006). For rotational atherectomy, despite improvement in acute luminal results with increased burr/artery ratio, the use of a moderate burr/artery ratio correlated with the lowest revascularization rates. There was no correlation between postatherectomy or final diameter stenosis and need for repeat interventions. However, the use of large balloon/artery ratios after rotablator was associated with higher target vessel revascularization rates.     

Effect of nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, on clinical and angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: the FACT study. Fraxiparine Angioplastie Coronaire Transluminale

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the antiproliferative effect of heparin after arterial injury is maximized by pretreatment. No previous studies of restenosis have used a pretreatment strategy. We designed this study to determine whether treatment with nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, started 3 days before the procedure and continued for 3 months, affected angiographic restenosis or clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, elective coronary angioplasty was performed on 354 patients who were treated with daily subcutaneous nadroparin (0.6 mL of 10,250 anti-Xa IU/mL) or placebo injections started 3 days before angioplasty and continued for 3 months. Angiography was performed just before and immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up. The primary study end point was angiographic restenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography 3 months after balloon angioplasty. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 6 months. Clinical and procedural variables and the occurrence of periprocedural complications did not differ between groups. At angiographic follow-up, the mean minimal lumen diameter and the mean residual stenosis in the nadroparin group (1.37+/-0.66 mm, 51.9+/-21.0%) did not differ from the corresponding values in the control group (1.48+/-0.59 mm, 48.8+/-18.9%). Combined major cardiac-related clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) did not differ between groups (30.3% versus 29.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin continued for 3 months after balloon angioplasty had no beneficial effect on angiographic restenosis or on adverse clinical outcomes.     

The use of relational databases in the transition from quality assurance to continuous quality improvement: a clinical practice model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The solid-state, mid-infrared holmium:YAG laser (2.1 microm wavelength) is a relatively new percutaneous device that has recently been evaluated in a multicenter study. Because of its unique wavelength and photoacoustic effects on atherosclerotic plaques, this laser may be useful in treatment of symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mid-infrared laser angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laser angioplasty was performed on 2,038 atherosclerotic lesions in 1,862 consecutive patients with a mean age of 61 +/- 11 years. Clinical indications included unstable angina (69%), stable angina (20%), acute infarction (6%), and positive exercise test (5%). Complex lesion morphology included eccentricity (62%), thrombus (30%), total occlusion (27%), long lesions (14%), and saphenous vein grafts (11%). RESULTS: This laser catheter alone successfully reduced stenosis (>20%) in 87% of lesions. With adjunct balloon angioplasty, 93% procedural success was achieved. The presence of thrombus within the target lesion was a predictor of procedural success (OR = 2.0 [95% confidence interval 2.0, 4.0], P = .04). Bifurcation lesions (OR = 0.5 [95% confidence interval 0.2, 1.0], P = .05) and severe tortuosity of the treated vessel (OR = 0.4 [95% confidence interval 0.2, 0.9], P = .02) were identified as significant predictors of decreased laser success. Calcium within the lesion was associated with reduced procedural success (OR = 0.57 [95% confidence interval 0.34, 0.97], P = .03), and calcified lesions required significantly more energy pulses than noncalcified lesions (119 +/- 91 pulses vs. 101 +/- 86 pulses, respectively, P = .0002). Complications included in-hospital bypass surgery 2.5%, Q-wave myocardial infarction 1.2%, and death 0.8%. Perforation occurred in 2.2% of patients; major dissection in 5.8% of patients, and spasm in 12% of patients. No predictor of major complications was identified. Six-month angiographic restenosis was documented in 54% of patients, and clinical restenosis occurred in 34% of patients. CONCLUSION: Mid-infrared laser has a safety profile similar to that of other debulking devices. This laser may be useful in select patients presenting with acute ischemic syndromes associated with intracoronary thrombus; however, like other coronary lasers, it is limited by the need for adjunctive balloon angioplasty and/or stenting to achieve adequate final luminal diameter. No beneficial effects on reducing 6-month restenosis rates were observed.