Laryngeal tuberculosis and laryngeal cancer

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to the putative dopamine D3 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT could be prevented by either selective D1-type or D2-type dopamine receptor antagonists. In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250-350 g) were given seven to nine injections (at 48-h intervals) of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) or vehicle in combination with the D2-type dopamine antagonist eticlopride (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D1-type dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 2 h. In the first two experiments, after seven injections, all rats were tested for activity following vehicle injections to test for possible conditioning effects. In each experiment, after the last pre-exposure session, all rats were given a challenge injection of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for activity. Major findings were as follows: a) 7-OH-DPAT treatments produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with repeated treatment; b) concurrent treatment with eticlopride or SCH 23390 (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) blocked the acute locomotor-activating effects of 7-OH-DPAT across days; c) eticlopride, but not SCH 23390, completely blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT. Although the low dose of SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) produced a partial attenuation of sensitization, the higher dose (0.2 mg/kg) of SCH 23390 appeared to augment, rather than block, sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT; d) rats previously treated with SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg, but not 0.1 mg/kg) without 7-OH-DPAT displayed a hyperactive response to the 7-OH-DPAT challenge injection; and e) after vehicle injections, rats previously given 7-OH-DPAT, SCH 23390, or eticlopride either alone or in combination were more active than vehicle control rats. These findings suggest that the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT may differ from those of other dopamine D2-type agonists such as quinpirole or bromocriptine. Moreover, these results demonstrate that hyperactivity responses following vehicle injections in drug-pretreated animals do not necessarily reflect conditioning mechanisms.     

The role of mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine.

Daily administration of psychomotor stimulants in a distinctive environment can impart on the environment stimulantlike properties. Rats injected with amphetamine (0.75 mg/kg, sc) daily for 5 days exhibited a robust unconditioned locomotor response, measured in photocell cages, and showed a conditioned locomotor response when treated with saline on the 6th day. This conditioned locomotor response was found to be significantly attenuated by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of the nucleus accumbens when the lesion was made either pre- or postconditioning. Similarly, although rats with 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens exhibited a robust supersensitive unconditioned locomotor hyperactivity in response to apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg, sc), they did not show a conditioned response on the test day. Results suggest that the mesolimbic dopamine system may be responsible for both the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor responses to psychomotor stimulant drugs. Further, conditioned locomotion depends on a critical interaction between the physiological release of presynaptic dopamine and occupation of postsynaptic receptors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Non-amphetaminic mechanism of stimulant locomotor effect of modafinil in mice

Previously established dose-response curves indicated that modafinil 20-40 mg/kg i.p. elicited in mice an obvious stimulation of locomotor activity roughly similar to that induced by (+)amphetamine 2-4 mg/kg. The effects of various agents modifying dopamine transmission were compared on the locomotor response to both drugs. The preferential D2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol 37.5-150 micrograms/kg i.p. suppressed the stimulant effect of (+)amphetamine in a dose dependent manner, but not that of modafinil. The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (7.5-30 micrograms/kg s.c.) reversed the (+)amphetamine but not the modafinil induced hyperactivity. The tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (200 mg/kg) suppressed the hyperactivity induced by 4 mg/kg dexamphetamine but not that induced by 20 mg/kg modafinil. Associating L-DOPA 150 mg/kg and benserazide 37.5 mg/kg with (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg resulted in stereotyped climbing behavior, that was not observed with modafinil 10-80 mg/kg. The profound akinesia induced by reserpine (4 mg/kg s.c.; 5 h before testing) was reversed by (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg but not by modafinil 40 mg/kg. Finally, on synaptosomes prepared from mouse striata preloaded with [3H]dopamine, modafinil 10(-5) M did not increase the spontaneous [3H]dopamine release whereas (+)amphetamine, at the same concentration, doubled it. From all these differences between the two drugs, it is concluded that the mechanism underlying the modafinil induced stimulant locomotor effect differs completely from that of (+)amphetamine.     

Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy

The activation of rat mesocortical dopaminergic (DA) neurons evoked by the electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) induces a marked inhibition of the spontaneous activity of prefrontocortical cells. In the present study, it was first shown that systemic administration of either clozapine (a mixed antagonist of D1, D2, and alpha1-adrenergic receptors) (3-5 mg/kg, i.v.), prazosin (an alpha1-adrenergic antagonist) (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), or sulpiride (a D2 antagonist) (30 mg/kg, i.v.), but not SCH 23390 (a D1 antagonist) (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), reversed this cortical inhibition. Second, it was found that following the systemic administration of prazosin, the VTA-induced cortical inhibition reappeared when either SCH 23390 or sulpiride was applied by iontophoresis into the prefrontal cortex. Third, it was seen that, whereas haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), a D2 antagonist which also blocks alpha1-adrenergic receptors, failed to reverse the VTA-induced inhibition, the systemic administration of haloperidol plus SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked this inhibition. Finally, it was verified that the cortical inhibitions obtained following treatments with either "prazosin plus sulpiride" or "prazosin plus SCH 23390" were blocked by a superimposed administration of either SCH 23390 or sulpiride, respectively. These data indicate that complex interactions between cortical D2, D1, and alpha1-adrenergic receptors are involved in the regulation of the activity of prefrontocortical cells innervated by the VTA neurons. They confirm that the physiological stimulation of cortical alpha1-adrenergic receptors hampers the functional activity of cortical D1 receptors and suggest that the stimulations of cortical D1 and D2 receptors exert mutual inhibition on each other's transmission.     

A heroin-, but not a cocaine-expecting, self-administration state preferentially alters endogenous brain peptides

The effects of L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blockers on apomorphine, bromocriptine and morphine-induced changes in locomotor activity were examined in mice. Apomorphine (4 mg/kg) and morphine (20 mg/kg) produced locomotor stimulation. Bromocriptine (8 mg/kg) produced a biphasic effect on motor behaviour, an early depressant phase, followed by locomotor stimulation. Amlodipine (2.5 mg/kg), nicardipine (10 mg/kg), diltiazem (10 mg/kg) and verapamil (10 mg/kg), which by itself did not affect locomotor activity, inhibited the stimulant phase of bromocriptine without altering the depressant phase, while they did not affect apomorphine- and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. Apomorphine, bromocriptine and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation was decreased by SCH 23390 (R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine-7- ol) (0.05 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg). These results indicate that L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are involved in the motor stimulant effect of bromocriptine, but not in apomorphine- and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. The effects of Ca2+ channel blockers on the dopaminergic system appears not to be directly related to dopamine receptor blockade.     

Amphetamine lowers brain stimulation reward (BSR) threshold in alcohol-preferring (P) and non-preferring (NP) rats: Regulation by D? and D? receptors in the nucleus accumbens.

Differences in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway that regulates alcohol preference may also increase sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of other drugs of abuse. In the present study, the curve-shift (rate-frequency) paradigm was used to quantify the interaction of amphetamine with the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward (BSR) in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rats. The role of D? and D? DA receptors of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in mediating the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine was also determined. Animals were tested with randomly administered amphetamine (0.25, 0.75, 1.25 mg/kg ip), DA-receptor antagonists (SCH 23390 [2.0 μg, 5.0 μg]; eticlopride [2.0 μg, 5.0 μg]), or a combination of the 2 (SCH 23390 [2.0 μg, 5.0 μg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine; eticlopride [2.0 μg, 5.0 μg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine). Amphetamine produced comparable dose-related leftward shifts in the rate-frequency function for both P and NP rats, with a greater than 60% reduction observed in BSR threshold. On intervening days, baseline threshold was unaltered between tests and similar between rat lines. Unilateral infusion in the NAcc of either the D? or D? receptor antagonist produced rightward shifts in the rate-frequency function of amphetamine, completely reversing-attenuating its reward-enhancing effects. The results demonstrate that amphetamine produces similar threshold-lowering effects in both P and NP rats and that the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine do not correlate with alcohol preference under the conditions of the present study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of SCH23390 and raclopride on anxiety-like behavior in rats tested in the black-white box

Dopamine (DA) systems are activated by stress, and this response has as a corollary the induction of stress-related behaviors such as anxiety. In mice, D2 receptor blockade produces an apparent anxiogenic effect, although locomotor impairments might have been present. We investigated the effects of D1 and D2 antagonists on a variety of anxiety-like behaviors induced by the black-white box in rats and carefully screened for any locomotor deficits. Adult male Lister hooded rats were injected with either the D1 antagonist SCH23390 (0. 0.1. or 0.25 mg/kg i.p.) or the D2 antagonist raclopride (0, 0.05, or 0.10 mg/kg i.p.) 20 min prior to being placed into the white chamber of the black-white box (n = 8-10/group). Rats were videotaped and the tapes were scored for latency to exit the white chamber, latency to reenter the white chamber, time spent in the white chamber, intercompartmental crossing, and locomotor activity. ANOVA revealed no effect of the D1 antagonist SCH23390 on any behavioral measure. However, the raclopride-treated rats left the white area sooner than control rats (p < 0.01). Raclopride-treated rats also exhibited delayed reentry times to the white chamber compared to control rats (p < 0.01) and spent significantly less time in the white chamber (p < 0.05). Neither SCH23390 nor raclopride affected locomotor activity in a manner that confounded these behaviors. These results confirm that D2 receptor blockade enhances anxiety in rats tested in the black-white box.     

Sensitization of amphetamine-induced stereotyped behaviors during the acute response

The quantitative and qualitative features of the behavioral response to amphetamine-like stimulants in rats can be dissociated from the dopamine response. This dissociation is particularly evident in the temporal profiles of the extracellular dopamine and stereotypy responses to higher doses of amphetamine. One possible mechanism contributing to this temporal dissociation is that during the acute response to amphetamine, dopamine receptor mechanisms are enhanced such that stereotyped behaviors can be supported by synaptic concentrations of dopamine which are not sufficient to initiate these behaviors. To further explore the dynamics of stimulant sensitivity during the acute response, we examined the behavioral and extracellular dopamine responses to a low, nonstereotypy-producing dose of amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) at various times after an acute, priming injection of 4.0 mg/kg when stereotypies had subsided and extracellular dopamine was approaching predrug baseline levels. The low-dose challenge produced intense stereotypies although the regional dopamine responses were not significantly different from control animals. Blockade of the expression of stereotypies during the priming response by the D2 antagonist haloperidol or the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 prevented the expression of an enhanced stereotypy response to the challenge injection. Our results suggest that an exposure to amphetamine results in a rapid sensitization of the stereotypy response which does not involve changes in the extracellular dopamine response but requires activation of dopamine receptors. Such a mechanism may be significantly implicated during binge patterns of stimulant abuse and may also play a role in the sensitization associated with repeated amphetamine administration.     

Different inhibition of conditioned avoidance response by clozapine and DA D? and D? antagonists in male mice.

The effects of clozapine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), and raclopride (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) on the acquisition and performance of a conditioned avoidance response (CAR) were studied in BALB/C mice. The high dose of clozapine decreased avoidances and crossings in acquisition and performance. SCH 23390 had no effect on acquisition, whereas a decrease of avoidances and crossings was produced by the high dose in performance. The high dose of raclopride decreased avoidances and crossings in acquisition but had no effects on performance. The results suggest that the mechanisms by which these drugs affect avoidance are not the same. This difference may reflect an action on different subtypes of DA receptors that produces different effects on motor behavior. It seems that in all cases where CAR is impaired, locomotor activity is also suppressed; therefore, a parsimonious interpretation is that the CAR procedure is sensitive to motor effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Dopamine receptor antagonists in the nucleus accumbens attenuate analgesia induced by ventral tegmental area substance P or morphine and by nucleus accumbens amphetamine

In the present study, we examined the effects of dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists infused into the nucleus accumbens septi (NAS) on analgesia induced by intra-ventral tegmental area (VTA) infusions of the substance P (SP) analog, DiMe-C7 or morphine and intra-NAS infusions of amphetamine. Rats received intra-NAS infusions of either the mixed DA receptor antagonist flupenthixol (1.5 or 3.0 microg/0.5 microl/side; DiMe-C7 only), the DA D1/D5 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1 microg/0.5 microl/side; DiMe-C7 only) or the DA D2-type receptor antagonist raclopride (1.0, 3.0 or 5.0 microg/0.5 microl/side). Ten minutes later, rats received intra-VTA infusions of DiMe-C7 (3.0 microg/0.5 microl/side) or morphine (3.0 microg/0.5 microl/side) or intra-NAS infusions of amphetamine (2.5 microg/0.5 microl/side). Animals were then administered the formalin test for tonic pain. Intra-NAS raclopride prevented analgesia induced by intra-VTA DiMe-C7, intra-VTA morphine and intra-NAS amphetamine. Similarly, intra-NAS flupenthixol or SCH 23390 attenuated the analgesia induced by intra-VTA DiMe-C7. These findings suggest that tonic pain is inhibited, at least in part, by enhanced DA released from terminals of mesolimbic neurons. Furthermore, the evidence that SP and opioids in the VTA mediate stress-induced analgesia suggests that the pain-suppression system involving the activation of mesolimbic DA neurons is naturally triggered by exposure to stress, pain or both.     

Stereotyped behavior and diabetes mellitus in rats: Reduced behavioral effects of amphetamine and apomorphine and reduced in vivo brain binding of [–3H]spiroperidol.

In 4 experiments, male Sprague-Dawley rats made diabetic by an intravenous injection of streptozotocin (65 mg/kg) showed decreased stereotyped behaviors following subcutaneous (sc) administration of apomorphine HCL (1 mg/kg) or dextro-amphetamine sulfate (3 mg/kg). Spontaneous activity in an open field was lower in diabetics than in controls, but a low dose (25 μg/kg, sc) of apomorphine produced equivalent fractional decreases in activity in both groups. In vivo accumulation of amphetamine and apomorphine was generally similar in both groups: Reduced tissue access did not appear to be responsible for the decreased behavioral effects of these agents. The in vivo accumulation of spiroperidol in several brain regions was generally less in diabetics than in controls. Data are discussed in terms of altered catecholamine biochemistry and behavior in diabetics. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Enhancement of effects of dopaminergic agonists on neuronal activity in the caudate-putamen of the rat following long-term d-amphetamine administration

Amphetamine- and apomorphine-induced changes in the activity of neurons in the caudate-putamen of paralyzed, locally anesthetized rats were recorded in animals pretreated with 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine sulphate for 6, 18 or 36 days, or in animals pretreated with saline for 36 consecutive days. In saline-pretreated animals, 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine sulphate (IP) produced an initial, brief potentiation of neuronal firing that was followed by a marked depression of neuronal activity lasting for approximately 35 to 110 min after injection. In amphetamine-pretreated animals, this depression of neuronal activity to the same dose of the drug was markedly prolonged, especially in animals given 36 consecutive days of d-amphetamine pretreatment. A similar enhancement occurred in response to 0.25 mg/kg apomorphine (IP) in animals pretreated with amphetamine for 36 days compared to saline-pretreated control animals. These results are discussed in relation to the known behavioral and biochemical effects of acute and long-term amphetamine administration.     

Mifepristone prevents the expression of long-term behavioural sensitization to amphetamine

Three weeks following intermittent amphetamine exposure (2.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days), rats showed an enhanced locomotor response to an amphetamine challenge. Mifepristone (20 mg/kg) given 45 min prior to the challenge completely prevented the expression of amphetamine hyperresponsiveness. The glucocorticoid antagonist did not affect the locomotor response to amphetamine in drug-naive rats. These data demonstrate for the first time that glucocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment may prevent long-term hyperreactivity to drugs of abuse in individuals with a drug history.     

AMPA-receptors are involved in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation, but not in the expression of amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in mice

We investigated the role of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptor antagonist 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline (NBQX) in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation and amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in mice. Repeated weekly administration of amphetamine (0.375 mg/kg) for 7 weeks led to an increased locomotor response when challenged with amphetamine 1 week later. NBQX attenuated this increased response at doses (3 and 30 mg/kg) which had no effect on the acute locomotor response to amphetamine. In a separate experiment, mice given amphetamine (1 mg/kg) in a distinctive environment, showed an increased locomotor response within this environment following a subsequent saline administration. NBQX (5-20 mg/kg) had no effect on the expression of this conditioned response. These results suggest that AMPA receptors are involved in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation in mice, and that this involvement is limited to either the neurobiological effects of amphetamine or the effects of amphetamine on conditioned associations, rather than drug environment conditioned associations.     

Discrete quinolinic acid lesions of the rat prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex affect cocaine- and MK-801-, but not morphine- and amphetamine-induced reward and psychomotor activation as measured with the place preference conditioning paradigm

As a part of the mesocorticolimbic system, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is thought to participate in the regulation of locomotor activity, motivation and reward. The mPFC consists of at least three different subareas. In previous lesion studies examining this region usually large parts of the mPFC were destroyed, with little discrimination between the different subareas. Therefore, this study was designed to selectively lesion the prelimbic area of the mPFC using a relatively low dose of quinolinic acid. In a conditioned place preference (CPP) experiment, lesioned and control animals were treated with cocaine (15 mg/kg), amphetamine (4 mg/kg), morphine (10 mg/kg) or MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) to induce CPP. The lesion blocked the development of CPP only in animals receiving cocaine, but not in animals receiving amphetamine or morphine. MK-801 failed to produce a CPP in both lesioned and unlesioned animals. During the conditioning experiment, the acute locomotor response to the different drugs was also measured. Only the response (in terms of locomotion and rearing) to cocaine and MK-801 was reduced to a significant extent by the lesion, while the response to amphetamine and morphine was not affected. Also, the lesions did not cause any changes in the spontaneous activity of the animals when tested without drug. These results show that even small lesions of the prelimbic subarea of the mPFC are sufficient to produce behavioral effects. However, these are apparent only when the animals are challenged with cocaine or MK-801, but not with amphetamine or morphine, or when drug-free. This suggests that the mPFC might have a special role in mediating cocaine and MK-801 effects.     

Acute responses to resistance training and safety

These studies investigated whether endogenous activation of CCK(A) receptors mediates the expression of amphetamine (AMP)-induced locomotor activity. In Experiment 1, locomotor activity was assessed in rats pretreated with the CCK(A) antagonist devazepide (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/kg) and subsequently injected with AMP (1.5 mg/kg). In Experiment 2, rats were administered AMP (1.5 mg/kg) once daily for 7 days. Following a 10-day withdrawal, locomotor activity was assessed following treatment with devazepide (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/kg) and AMP (0.75 mg/kg). In both studies, rats were classified as low (LR) or high (HR) responders based upon a median split of their locomotor response to a novel environment. Results from Experiment 1 showed that AMP potentiated the expression of locomotor activity, and this effect was most pronounced in HR rats. However, devazepide did not affect AMP-induced locomotion. Results from Experiment 2 demonstrated that chronic AMP pretreatment augmented the locomotor response to subsequent AMP challenge, and this effect was most pronounced in the HR group. Further, this augmented response was blocked by devazepide in HR rats. These findings constitute the first demonstration that endogenous CCK(A) receptor activation is an important substrate mediating AMP-induced locomotor activity in animals with a previous history of AMP treatment.     

Immune function alterations in mice tolerant to delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: functional and biochemical parameters

The present study examined (1) whether the neostriatum is involved in a drug-induced conditioned locomotor response and; (2) whether this structure participates in the development of behavioral sensitization. Moreover, the present study addressed the question whether the development of behavioral sensitization is necessary for the induction of conditioning. Rats received injections of either apomorphine (2 microg) or vehicle (solution of 0.1% ascorbate/saline) into the dorsal neostriatum daily for 7 days. These treatments were performed immediately prior to (apomorphine-paired group and vehicle group) or 30 min following (apomorphine-unpaired group) 10-min placement in an open field which served as the test environment. After a 3-day drug withdrawal period, the animals were given a 10-min non-drug vehicle test trial in the test environment. Three days later, a drug test with apomorphine was administered to the animals of the paired and unpaired treatment groups; the vehicle group again received an injection of vehicle. The analysis of locomotor activity in the open field (measured as the distance traversed) revealed that locomotor activity in the apomorphine-paired group was higher than in the other groups. There were no indications for behavioral sensitization to intrastriatal apomorphine, since the locomotor response in the apomorphine-paired group did not increase, but rather decreased with daily repeated injections of apomorphine. Furthermore, only the apomorphine-paired animals showed a higher locomotor response when tested after an intrastriatal injection of vehicle in the previously apomorphine-paired environment, which is indicative of a conditioned drug effect. These results suggest that the neostriatum is directly involved in the development of drug-induced conditioning of locomotor behavior but not in the establishment of behavioral sensitization.     

Simulation exercises, a problem oriented method of learning public health in medical education]

Spontaneous and amphetamine-elicited locomotor activity in rats is reduced by most clinically effective antipsychotic drugs. We have recently demonstrated that intracerebroventricular infusion of kainic acid (KA), which produces cell loss in the hippocampus and other limbic-cortical brain regions, increases spontaneous and amphetamine-elicited locomotion. The present study determined if KA lesions alter the suppressive effects of the antipsychotic drugs, haloperidol and clozapine, on spontaneous and amphetamine-elicited locomotor behavior. Young adult male rats (70 days of age) received intracerebroventricular infusions of vehicle or KA, which produced hippocampal pyramidal cell loss in each rat and more variable cell loss or gliosis in the amygdala, piriform cortex, and laterodorsal thalamus. Thirty days post-surgery, lesioned and control rats were tested once a week for locomotor responses to drug treatments. As observed previously, spontaneous locomotor activity and hyperactivity elicited by amphetamine (1.50 mg/kg s.c.) were greater in lesioned animals than controls. In addition, the level of spontaneous activity and/or amphetamine-elicited hyperlocomotion observed in lesioned rats after haloperidol treatment (0.13, 0.35, or 1.50 mg/kg s.c.) was greater than that found in controls. Locomotor responses to low (6.30 mg/kg) and moderate doses of clozapine (20 mg/kg) were similar in lesioned and control rats, although lesioned rats were more active than controls following the administration of a high dose of clozapine (30 mg/kg). These data indicate that the hyperactivity associated with limbic-cortical lesions may be insensitive to reversal by haloperidol, yet uniquely sensitive to suppression by clozapine.     

Effects of amphetamine, morphine and dizocilpine (MK-801) on spontaneous alternation in the 8-arm radial maze

The induction of psychomotor activation, behavioural sensitization and of perseverative behaviours, resulting in reduced behavioural variability, have been proposed to be common properties of drugs of abuse. The present investigation tested whether these drug effects could be measured using spontaneous alternation in an 8-arm radial maze. Behavioural effects of repeated treatment with amphetamine (2 and 4 mg/kg, i.p.), morphine (1.25 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, i.p.), on spontaneous alternation were evaluated in this paradigm. All drugs induced psychomotor activation. Sensitized as well as reduced locomotor activity could be observed after repeated treatment depending on drug and dose. Analysis of the sequences of arm entries revealed that all drugs induced perseverative locomotor patterns, but the pattern induced by amphetamine and morphine differed qualitatively from the pattern induced by MK-801.     

Agonist-induced desensitization of adenylyl cyclase activity mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine7 receptors in rat frontocortical astrocytes

A reward-relevant relationship between dopamine projection regions of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) was investigated through the use of brain stimulation reward (BSR) thresholds. Using a rate-free method, changes in VTA BSR thresholds were determined after intracranial injections of the dopamine D1 antagonist, SCH 23390 into the prefrontal cortex (PFC), or the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Reward thresholds assessed immediately after the infusion of SCH 23390 into the NAcc (0.5 microgram/0.5 microliter/side) were significantly higher than those assessed just after saline infusions, indicating a drug-induced attenuation of the rewarding effects of the brain stimulation. The effects of this dose subsided when tested 24 h later. Conversely, intra-PFC infusions of SCH 23390 at the same dose (0.5 microgram/0.5 microliter/side) resulted in lowered BSR thresholds when rats were tested immediately after infusion. In addition, animals tested 24 h after receiving the lowest dose (0.125 microgram/0.5 microliter/side) demonstrated a robust delayed threshold-lowering effect. These immediate and delayed effects of the intra-PFC dopamine antagonist demonstrate a facilitation of VTA BSR and are consistent with the view that PFC dopamine serves a modulatory role over important reward elements within the NAcc. The deferred effects of intra-prefrontal cortex DA receptor blockade on brain stimulation reward thresholds may reflect adaptive responses of subcortical structures to changes in PFC dopamine neurotransmission. It has been suggested that neural adjustments of this type may underlie long term changes in central nervous system functioning brought about by disease, drug use or behavioral conditioning.