PSA performances and viscoelastic properties of SIS‐based PSA blends with H‐DCPD tackifiers

Hotmelt pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) usually contain styrenic block copolymers like styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), SBS, SEBS, tackifier, oil, and additives. These block copolymers individually reveal no tack. Therefore, a tackifier is a low molecular weight material with high glass transition temperature (T_g), and imparts the tacky property to PSA. The SIS block copolymer with different diblocks was blended with hydrogenated dicyclopentadiene (H‐DCPD tackifier), which has three kinds of T_g. PSA performance was evaluated by probe tack, peel strength, and shear adhesion failure temperature. PSA is a viscoelastic material, so that its performance is significantly related to the viscoelastic properties of PSAs. We tested the viscoelastic properties by dynamic mechanical analysis and the thermal properties by differential scanning calorimeter to investigate the relation between viscoelastic properties and PSA performance. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl PolymSci 102: 2839–2846, 2006     

Synthesis and characteristics of photoactive‐hydrogenated rosin epoxy methacrylate for pressure sensitive adhesives

Hydrogenated rosin epoxy methacrylate (HREM), based on hydrogenated rosin and glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), was synthesized for use as an advanced tackifier in the UV‐crosslinking pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) system. The HREM, as a tackifier, contained UV‐curing sites; thus, allowed photopolymerization to occur by UV irradiation. This UV‐curable tackifier, HREM, can improve the curing rate and adhesion performance of UV‐crosslinking PSAs. The characteristics of HREM were analyzed by GPC and DSC and its synthetic mechanism studied using FTIR and ¹H NMR; the characteristic peaks of hydrogenated rosin and GMA vanished, but new peaks for HREM appeared. The PDI and the T_g by DSC were 1 and ?25.6°C, respectively. The photopolymerization of HREM was studied using photo‐DSC. Heat flow was observed during UV irradiation, and the curing rate and conversion both increased with rising photoinitiator content. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Effects of miscibility on probe tack of natural-rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesives

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 29 kinds of tackifier resins, which were prepared from rosin, terpenes, and petroleum. Miscibilities of all the blend systems were illustrated as phase diagrams in our previous articles. From these blend systems, we selected 7 systems having typical phase diagrams [completely miscible, completely immiscible, and lower critical solution temperature (LCST) types] and carried out measurements of probe tack. Probe tack values were measured at various rates of separation and temperatures to obtain master curves. In the case of miscible pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) at the condition of measurement, the peak position in the master curve of probe tack shifted to the lower velocity (higher temperature) as the tackifier content increased. On the contrary, immiscible PSAs had much smaller probe tack values than miscible ones and did not give manifest shift of peaks. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 771–776, 1998     

Temperature dependence of tack and pulse NMR analysis of polystyrene block copolymer/tackifier system

The influence of tackifier structure on the temperature dependence of tack for a polystyrene block copolymer/tackifier system was investigated. A blend of polystyrene-block-polyisoprene-block- polystyrene triblock and polystyrene-block-polyisoprene diblock copolymers was used as the base polymer. Four different tackifiers were used: special rosin ester resin (RE), rosin phenolic resin (RP), hydrogenated cyclo-aliphatic resin (HC), and aliphatic petroleum resin (C5). Tack at 20?°C increased with the tackifier content for both RE and HC tackifier systems. Tack is affected by two factors: the work of adhesion at the adherend interface and the viscoelastic properties of the adhesive. The good balance of these two factors brought high tack. The adhesive with 10 wt.% tackifier exhibited the highest tack at 20?°C, whereas those with 30 and 50 wt.% tackifier were lower than those systems with 10 wt.% of the RP or C5 tackifiers. The adhesive with overly high hardness lowered the work of adhesion and the tack was not improved with more than 30 wt.%. A compatibility test in toluene solution and in solid state showed that tackifier RE has good compatibility with both polyisoprene and polystyrene, whereas tackifier RP has lower compatibility. Tackifiers HC and C5 had good compatibility with polyisoprene, but poor compatibility with polystyrene, and that of C5 was poorer. Pulse nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses indicated that tackifiers RE and HC effectively restrict the molecular mobility of polyisoprene phase.     

Miscibility and adhesive properties of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)‐based hot‐melt adhesives. I. Adhesive tensile strength

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) were blended with some tackifier resins that are made from wood extracts, and possible relations between their miscibility and properties as hot‐melt adhesives (HMA) were investigated. From our previous report on miscibility of various EVA‐based HMAs, we chose some blends that represent some of typical miscibility types and measured their adhesive tensile strengths. When the blends were miscible at testing temperatures, the temperature at which the maximum value of adhesive tensile strength was recorded tended to move toward higher temperature as tackifier content of blends increased. This result corresponds to the glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends that became higher as tackifier content of blends increased when blend components were miscible. In terms of HMA performances, we suggest that factors other than miscibility affect absolute values of adhesive tensile strength more directly than miscibility; this idea has to be investigated further in a future study. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 719–725, 2002     

Miscibility and fracture energy of probe tack for acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives: acrylic copolymer/tackifier resin systems

The relationship between the miscibility of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) and the fracture energy (W) (Jm⁻²) of the probe tack was investigated, wherein the master curve of W was compared with that of the maximum force (σ_max) (gf) of the probe tack. It was ascertained that W of acrylic PSA was closely related to the miscibility between the components (acrylic copolymer and tackifier resin). In the case of the miscible blend system, the master curve of W shifted toward the lower rate side and, at the same time, the magnitude decreased as the tackifier resin content increased. The degree of the shift of W was extremely smaller than that of σ_max. In the case of the immiscible blend system, the master curve of W remarkably decreased as the tackifier resin content increased, which suggests the fact that W of the PSA depended on the dynamic mechanical properties of the matrix phase and that the resin-rich phase acted as a kind of filler, thus reducing the practical performance. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 581–587, 1998     

Adhesion behavior of blends of polybutadiene and tackifiers

The adhesion behavior of blends of polybutadiene (PB) and tackifiers was investigated. The peel strength was found to be significantly dependent on blend composition, and a maximum strength behavior was observed for all blend systems. The tack mechanisms were proposed to explain the observed adhesion behavior. The position of the glass transition temperature is related to where the highest tack appears for the miscible blend; for the partially miscible blend the dispersed phase plays an important role in determining the maximum adhesion, and the critical size of the dispersed phase and the Tg of the tackifier phase together determine what concentration of tackifier gives the maximum tack. For the immiscible blends, the maximum adhesion is controlled by both the surface glass transition temperature and the critical diameter of the domains of the tackifier phase.     

氢化丙烯酸松香/丙烯酸酯复合乳液的制备及其压敏胶的性能

以氢化丙烯酸松香为增黏树脂,将其溶解在丙烯酸酯单体中,预乳化后采用半连续乳液聚合工艺制备了氢化丙烯酸松香/丙烯酸酯复合乳液。研究了氢化丙烯酸松香的用量对单体转化率、凝胶率、溶胶相对分子质量及其分布、乳胶膜的玻璃化温度(Tg)和压敏胶粘接性能等的影响。结果表明,氢化丙烯酸松香对单体聚合具有一定的阻聚作用,随着氢化丙烯酸松香用量的增加,单体转化率、凝胶率及相对分子质量下降,相对分子质量分布变窄。氢化丙烯酸松香的合适用量为8.0%wt,此时压敏胶的初黏力为15#,180°剥离强度为10.6N.25mm-1,持黏力大于120h。     

Effects of compatibility between tackifier and polymer on adhesion property and phase structure: Tackifier‐added polystyrene‐based triblock/diblock copolymer blend system

The effects of compatibility of tackifier with polymer matrix and mixing weight ratio of triblock/diblock copolymers as the matrix on the adhesion property and phase structure of tackifier‐added polystryrene triblock/diblock copolymer blends were investigated. For this purpose, polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene triblock and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene diblock copolymers were used and the diblock weight ratio in the blend was varied from 0 to 1. Spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene (PI) continuous phase. In the case of the hydrogenated cycloaliphatic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with PI and a poor compatibility with polystyrene, the peel strength increased with an increase of the tackifier content, and the degree of increase became significant above 40 wt % of tackifier. It was found that the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier in the PI matrix were formed and the distance between the nearest neighbors of agglomerates was about 15 nm from SAXS measurement. The peel strength increased with an increase of the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier from TEM observation. On the other hand, in the case of the rosin phenolic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with both polystyrene and PI, the peel strength increased effectively at the lower tackifier content, while no significant increase at higher tackifier content was observed. The agglomerates of tackifier were never confirmed in this system. The higher peel strength was obtained at the diblock weight ratio in the blend of 0.5–0.7 for both tackifier‐added systems. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Hydrogenated rosin ester latexes/waterborne polyacrylate blends for pressure‐sensitive adhesives

Diethylene glycol ester of hydrogenated rosin (DGE‐HR) emulsion was prepared via phase inversion method and then blended with waterborne (wb) polyacrylate for pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs). The preparation conditions of DGE‐HR emulsion were studied. DGE‐HR emulsion with an average particle size of about 220 nm was obtained. Furthermore, the thermal, adhesive, and viscoelastic properties and the morphology of DGE‐HR/polyacrylate composite were investigated. Thermal analysis indicated that glass transition temperatures (T_g) of the DGE‐HR/polyacrylate blends became higher as the DGE‐HR content increased and DGE‐HR did not have a significant influence on thermal stability of the blend films. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) observation revealed that the DGE‐HR particles added had a good miscibility with acrylic particles. Additionally, for these tackified acrylic PSAs, positive correlations between mechanical performance and viscoelastic response at bonding and debonding frequencies were also found. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42965.     

Miscibility and shear creep resistance of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives: Acrylic copolymer and tackifier resin systems

The miscibility between an acrylic copolymer and a tackifier resin was investigated in terms of phase diagrams, glass transition temperatures (T_g's), and dynamic mechanical properties of blends. Shear creep resistance (holding power, t_b) of the blends was measured as a function of both temperature and stress (σ₀) in order to obtain the master curves. It was found that the shear creep resistance of the pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) was closely related to the miscibility between the components and viscoelastic properties of the blends. The master curve of the miscible blends shifts toward a longer time scale as the amount of tackifier resin in the blend is increased as a result of the modification of the bulk properties, and their behavior greatly depends on the glass transition temperature (T_g) and storage modulus (G′) of the blends. However, the master curve of immiscible blends where two phases exist in the system does not shift greatly toward a longer time scale, because T_g and the storage modulus of the blend do not change greatly. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Viscoelastic and adhesive properties of polystyrene-hydrogenated (3,4-polyisoprene and 1,4-polyisoprene)-polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate-polybutyl acrylate-polymethyl methacrylate-based HMPSA

In the current study, hot melt pressure sensitive adhesives (HMPSA) were prepared by blending polystyrene-hydrogenated (3,4-polyisoprene and 1,4-polyisoprene)-polystyrene (HYBRAR7311), polymethyl methacrylate-polybutyl acrylate-polymethyl methacrylate (LA2250), tackifier, and other additives in an internal mixer. The compatibility of LA2250, HYBRAR7311, and glycerol rosin ester was investigated on the basis of transparency, differential scanning calorimeter, and scanning electron microscope. The results indicated that glycerol rosin ester was compatible with HYBRAR7311 and LA2250, while HYBRAR7311 was only partly compatible with LA2250. Besides, styrene-ethylene-butene-styrene block copolymers grafted MALEIC ANLYDRIDE was used as compatibilizer added into HMPSA. Although it increased the compatibility and shear strength yet the tack and peel strength were sharply decreased. Simple variable method was used to study the effect of main components on the tack, peel strength, and shear strength of HMPSA. The relationship between adhesive properties and viscoelastic properties of HMPSA was studied via dynamic mechanical analysis. The investigation showed that the smaller storage modulus at low frequency (0.01–0.1?1/s), the larger the tack. Peel strength was found proportional to G′′(f₁)/G′(f₂)(f₁?=?32.03?1/s, f₂?=?0.07?1/s). Similarly, the effect of this blend on damping performance and substrate on peel strength of HMPSA was investigated which was found excellent in this case. The peel strength of polypropylene was larger when HYBRAR7311 content was more than LA2250. However, the peel strength of polycarbonate and polyethylene glycol terephthalate was larger when LA2250 content was more than HYBRAR7311. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of HYBRAR7311/LA2250 HMPSA were found to be superior to the one-polymer HMPSA.     

Viscoelastic and adhesive properties of single‐component thermo‐resistant acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives

Poly(butyl acrylate‐vinyl acetate‐acrylic acid) based acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) were synthesized by solution polymerization for the fabrication of high performance pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. The synthesized PSAs have high shear strength and can be peeled off substrate without residues on the substrate at temperature up to 150°C. The PSAs synthesized in the present work are single‐component crosslinked and they can be used directly once synthesized, which is convenient for real applications compared to commercial multi‐component adhesives. The results demonstrated that the viscosity of the PSAs remained stable during prolonged storage. The effects of the preparation conditions such as initiator concentration, cross‐linker amount, organosiloxane monomer amount and tackifier resin on the polymer properties, such as glass transition temperature (T_g), molecular weight (M_w), surface energy and shear modulus, were studied, and the dependence of the adhesive properties on the polymer properties were also investigated. Crosslinking reactions showed a great improvement in the shear strength at high temperature. The addition of tackifier resin made peel strength increase compared to original PSAs because of the improvement of the adhesion strength. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40086.     

Effects of miscibility and viscoelasticity on shear creep resistance of natural‐rubber‐based pressure‐sensitive adhesives

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 29 kinds of tackifier resins. Miscibilities of all the blend systems were illustrated as phase diagrams. From these blend systems, we selected 8 systems having typical phase diagrams (completely miscible, immiscible, lower critical solution temperature [LCST] types) and carried out measurements of shear creep resistance (holding power). Holding time was recorded as required time for the pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape under shear load to completely slip away from the adherend. Holding time of miscible PSA systems tended to decrease as the tackifier content increased. This is attributable to a decrease in plateau modulus of the PSA with increasing tackifier content. There was rather large difference in holding time by tackifier among the miscible PSA systems; the reason for this is also considered to be a difference in plateau modulus. Holding time of an immiscible PSA system scarcely changed by tackifier content. But in another immiscible system, holding time tended to increase with increasing tackifier content. In fact, in the case of immiscible PSAs, the effect of tackifier content on holding time was different from tackifier to tackifier. This may be caused by difference in extent of phase separation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1535–1545, 2000     

Influence of diblock addition on tack in a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system measured using a probe tack test

The influence of diblock copolymer addition on the tack properties of a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system was investigated. For this purpose, poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(n‐butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer consisting of the same components (MA) were used as base polymers, and a tackifier was added in amounts ranging from 10 to 30 wt %. The temperature dependence of tack was measured by a probe tack test. The tack of MAM/MA at room temperature was significantly higher than that of MAM, and the improvement of MAM/MA upon the addition of the tackifier was higher than that of MAM. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during the probe tack test was observed using a high‐speed microscope. It was found that for MAM/MA, cavitation was caused in the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed by the absorption of strain energy due to deformation of the adhesive layer. In contrast, for MAM, peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe. The greater flexibility of the soft block chain in the diblock copolymer resulted in improved interfacial adhesion. ¹H pulse nuclear magnetic resonance analysis showed that the addition of the tackifier improved the cohesive strength of the adhesive. Adhesion strength is affected by two factors: the development of interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength. In the MAM/MA/tackifier system, the presence of MA and the tackifier improved the interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength, respectively. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Effects of the compatibility of a polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier blend on the phase structure and tack of a pressure‐sensitive adhesive

Adhesion and viscoelastic properties and morphology of a polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier blend were investigated. Special rosin ester resins with different weight average molecular weights of 650, 710, 890, and 2160 were used as the tackifier and blended with a polyacrylic block copolymer consisting of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(n‐butyl acrylate) blocks at tackifier content levels of 10, 30, and 50 wt %. The compatibility decreased with an increase in molecular weight. From TEM observation, the number of formed agglomerates of the tackifier with sizes on the order of several tens of nanometers increased with increasing tackifier content and molecular weight of the tackifier in the range from 650 to 890. For the tackifier with a molecular weight of 2160, micrometer‐sized agglomerates were observed. The storage modulus at low temperature and the glass transition temperature of adhesive measured by a dynamic mechanical analysis increased dependent on the number of formed nanometer sized agglomerates. Tack was measured using a rolling cylinder tack tester over wide temperature and rolling rate ranges, and master curves were prepared in accordance with the time‐temperature superposition law. Tack and peel strength were optimum at a blend combination of intermediate compatibility, i.e., the molecular weight of 890. These optimum properties were correlated to maximal values of the storage modulus at room temperature and the glass transition temperature. Therefore, it was found that these features of blend properties are strongly affected by the nanometer sized agglomerates of tackifier. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Glass transition temperatures of hydrocarbon blends: Adhesives measured by differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis

A comparison of calculated and measured glass transition temperatures of a series of three‐component hydrocarbon blends was performed. The blends were prepared as mixtures of an elastomer with different proportions of tackifying resin and oil. Glass transition temperature, T_g, was measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) at four measurement frequencies. Most of these blends had pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) properties, and were used to prepare a series of PSA tapes. The adhesion of the PSA tapes was shown to be strongly dependent on T_g. Tack of PSA tapes was measured at two different temperatures, and shown to be directly correlated to the blend T_g. Several predictive methods for blend T_g that are based on individual component T_gs were evaluated. The prediction of blend T_g is far more accurate if the individual component T_g values are determined by DMA instead of DSC. In addition, the Gordon‐Taylor equation gave a significant improvement on predicted blend T_g when compared to the Fox equation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 826–832, 2000     

Fundamental Understanding in Rolling Ball Tack of Tackified Block Copolymer Adhesives

In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball tack is a very common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. This work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolling ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer(SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bulk properties of the adhesive.

Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Part of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to vary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is observed that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecular weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorporation of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent tends to produce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, and surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisoprene, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation.

Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an equation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball tack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these suggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.     

Miscibility studies of binary and ternary mixtures of tactic poly(methyl methacrylates) with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (i, a, and s PMMAs) were mixed with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used mainly to study the miscibility of these blends. iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with Saran F based on the transparency and a single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the films. However, sPMMA was immiscible with Saran F because of the observation of two T_gs and opacity in most compositions of the blend. aPMMA is known to be miscible with sPMMA. Therefore aPMMA is both miscible with Saran F and sPMMA but Saran F and sPMMA are immiscible. Preliminary results of the effect of adding of aPMMA to immiscible sPMMA and Saran F mixtures were also reported. First, binary mixtures of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs were also prepared and confirmed to be miscible. Elevation of T_g of the aPMMA/sPMMA blend above weight average was observed probably due to stereocomplexation occurred between aPMMA and sPMMA. Then ternary blends of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs and Saran F in the weight ratios of about 3/1/4, 2/2/4, and 1/3/4 were also measured calorimetrically. A single T_g was observed for these three compositions different from two T_gs detected in the sPMMA/Saran F (50.0/50.0, i.e., 4/4) blend. Obviously, the composition of Saran was fixed in the ternary blends. When the other half of the blends was changing from pure sPMMA to sPMMA and aPMMA mixture, the blends became miscible because of the addition of aPMMA. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1313–1321, 2000     

Influences of debonding rate and temperature on tack properties and peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system

The influences of debonding rate and temperature on the peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system were investigated. Poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) with hard block contents of 23 (MAM-23) and 16 wt.% (MAM-16) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer (MA) consisting of the same components (MAM-23/MA, total hard block content of 15 wt.%) were used as the base polymer. A special rosin ester was used as a tackifier at various contents in the block copolymer/tackifier system. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during probe tack testing was observed using a high-speed microscope at 23 °C with debonding rate of 10 mm/s. Three different peeling mechanisms were observed. Type A, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe without cavitation (MAM-23). Type B, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe with cavitation (MAM-16). Type C, where cavitation occurred over the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed (MAM-23/MA). The peel behavior of MAM-23 changed from Type A to Type B with a decrease of the debonding rate (1 mm/s) or increase of the temperature (40 °C). In contrast, there was no change for MAM-16 and MAM-23/MA. Cavity formation in an adhesive layer restrains peeling; therefore, it is desirable for improvement of the adhesion strength. The tack properties increased with the tackifier content, and the formation of cavitation was less than that for the systems without the tackifier.