Miscibility and PSA Performance of Acrylic Copolymer and Tackifier Resin Systems

The influence of miscibility of an acrylic PSA and several tackifier resin systems upon PSA performance was investigated. When the acrylic copolymer and the resins were blended in various proportions, three types of mixing state were found: miscible system, partially miscible system and immiscible system. In the case of miscible systems, PSA performance (tack, peel strength and shear resistance) depended upon the viscoelastic properties of the PSA. In the case of completely immiscible systems, the above PSA performance depended primarily upon the viscoelastic properties of a continuous matrix phase, and the separated resin phase acted as a kind of filler. In the case of partially miscible systems, the PSA performance changed discontinuously at the resin concentration where phase separation occurred. It suggests that the phase structure of a PSA greatly influences the PSA's performance.     

Miscibility and PSA Performance of Acrylic Copolymer and Tackifier Resin Systems

The influence of miscibility of an acrylic PSA and several tackifier resin systems upon PSA performance was investigated. When the acrylic copolymer and the resins were blended in various proportions, three types of mixing state were found: miscible system, partially miscible system and immiscible system. In the case of miscible systems, PSA performance (tack, peel strength and shear resistance) depended upon the viscoelastic properties of the PSA. In the case of completely immiscible systems, the above PSA performance depended primarily upon the viscoelastic properties of a continuous matrix phase, and the separated resin phase acted as a kind of filler. In the case of partially miscible systems, the PSA performance changed discontinuously at the resin concentration where phase separation occurred. It suggests that the phase structure of a PSA greatly influences the PSA's performance.     

Miscibility and Probe Tack of Acrylic Pressure Sensitive Adhesives—Acrylic Copolymer/Tackifier Resin Systems

Miscibility between acrylic copolymers and tackifier resins are investigated in terms of phase diagrams, and the probe tack of the blends are measured as a function of both temperature and rate of separation in order to obtain the master curves. It is found that the probe tack of the pressure sensitive adhesives are closely related to the miscibility between the components. The master curves of the miscible blends shift along the X(rate)-axis according to the change of T_g of the bulk materials with a gradual variation of the peak heights. However, those of the immiscible blends will not shift along the X(rate)-axis, but the magnitude will decrease with increase of a dispersed phase.     

Miscibility and adhesive properties of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)‐based hot‐melt adhesives. I. Adhesive tensile strength

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) were blended with some tackifier resins that are made from wood extracts, and possible relations between their miscibility and properties as hot‐melt adhesives (HMA) were investigated. From our previous report on miscibility of various EVA‐based HMAs, we chose some blends that represent some of typical miscibility types and measured their adhesive tensile strengths. When the blends were miscible at testing temperatures, the temperature at which the maximum value of adhesive tensile strength was recorded tended to move toward higher temperature as tackifier content of blends increased. This result corresponds to the glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends that became higher as tackifier content of blends increased when blend components were miscible. In terms of HMA performances, we suggest that factors other than miscibility affect absolute values of adhesive tensile strength more directly than miscibility; this idea has to be investigated further in a future study. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 719–725, 2002     

医用丙烯酸酯乳液压敏胶的研制

叙述了医用丙烯酸酯乳液压敏胶的合成与性能。并且讨论了软、硬单体配比,宫能单体含量及乳化剂用量等因素对压敏胶粘度、快粘力、持粘力、剥离强度等性能的影响。     

Effects of miscibility and viscoelasticity on shear creep resistance of natural‐rubber‐based pressure‐sensitive adhesives

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 29 kinds of tackifier resins. Miscibilities of all the blend systems were illustrated as phase diagrams. From these blend systems, we selected 8 systems having typical phase diagrams (completely miscible, immiscible, lower critical solution temperature [LCST] types) and carried out measurements of shear creep resistance (holding power). Holding time was recorded as required time for the pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape under shear load to completely slip away from the adherend. Holding time of miscible PSA systems tended to decrease as the tackifier content increased. This is attributable to a decrease in plateau modulus of the PSA with increasing tackifier content. There was rather large difference in holding time by tackifier among the miscible PSA systems; the reason for this is also considered to be a difference in plateau modulus. Holding time of an immiscible PSA system scarcely changed by tackifier content. But in another immiscible system, holding time tended to increase with increasing tackifier content. In fact, in the case of immiscible PSAs, the effect of tackifier content on holding time was different from tackifier to tackifier. This may be caused by difference in extent of phase separation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1535–1545, 2000     

Photocrosslinking of solvent-based acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA) by the use of selected photoinitiators type I

This study investigated the photocrosslinking of solvent-based acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA) containing selected photoinitiators type I, known as α-cleavage photoinitiators. Photocrosslinking of PSA, especially of acrylic PSA, is well established crosslinking process using the UV radiation technology. UV-initiated crosslinking of acrylic PSA allows the synthesis of the wide range of UV-crosslinkable PSA with the interesting features. Especially, the important balances of properties such as adhesive and cohesive strength which are typically critical for the application performance can be achieved by this technology. The selection of suitable photoinitiator plays an important role to obtain the optimum properties of acrylic PSA including tack, peel adhesion, and shear strength. In this study, the investigations on different saturated conventional photoinitiators of type I for solvent-based PSA were carried out. The effects of photoinitiator concentration, UV crosslinking time and UV dose on the tack, peel strength, and shear strength were explored in detail for guiding the choice of photoinitiators to fabricate advanced PSA for industrial usage.     

Molecular parameters and their relation to the adhesive performance of emulsion acrylic pressure‐sensitive adhesives. II. Effect of crosslinking

Acrylic emulsion pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) films generally have much lower shear holding power than that of their solvent‐borne counterparts for the same peel and tack. This is due to their discrete microgel morphology in the film. In contrast, film cast from solution‐polymerized acrylic PSA forms a continuous network as a result of crosslinking acrylic acid and aluminum acetyl acetonate (AAA) in the film following the solvent evaporation. Novel acrylic emulsion PSA was made by copolymerizing ≤1 wt % isobutoxy methyl acrylamide (IBMA) in the polymer backbone. The IBMA grafted the linear portion of the acrylic polymer with the microgels upon heating the film, which resulted in a significant increase in the shear holding power. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2558–2564, 2001     

Crosslinking of pressure sensitive adhesive based on water‐borne acrylate

This publication shows how the kind of crosslinking agents and their contents influence important properties of acrylic based pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) dispersions such as tack, adhesion and cohesion. Synthesized PSAs based on acrylic polymers, containing 2‐ethylhexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, styrene and acrylic acid are used in the preparation of self‐adhesive dispersions used as coating of polyethylene foams and poly(vinyl chloride) and polyester foils. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of surface modification by oxygen plasma on peel adhesion of pressure‐sensitive adhesive tapes

Surfaces of poly(isobutylene) (PIB) and poly(butylacrylate) (PBA) pressure‐sensitive adhesive tapes were treated by oxygen plasma, and effects of surface modification on their adhesive behavior were investigated from the viewpoint of peel adhesion. The peel adhesion between PIB and PBA pressure‐sensitive adhesive tapes and stainless steel has been improved by the oxygen plasma treatment. The surface‐modification layer was formed on PIB and PBA pressure‐sensitive adhesive surfaces by the oxygen plasma treatment. The oxygen plasma treatment led to the formation of functional groups such as various carbonyl groups. The treated layer was restricted to the topmost layer (50–300 nm) from the surface. The GPC curves of the oxygen plasma‐treated PBA adhesive were less changed. Although a degradation product of 1–3% was formed in the process of the oxygen plasma treatment of the PIB adhesive. There are differences in the oxygen plasma treatment between the PIB and PBA adhesives. A close relationship was recognized between the amount of carbonyl groups and peel adhesion. Therefore, the carbonyl groups formed on the PIB and PBA adhesive surfaces may be a main factor to improve the peel adhesion between the PIB and PBA adhesive and stainless steel. The peel adhesion could be controlled by changing the carbonyl concentration on the PIB and PBA adhesive surfaces. We speculate that the carbonyl groups on the PIB and PBA adhesive surface might provide an interaction with a stainless steel surface. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1392–1401, 2000     

Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Pressure Sensitive Adhesives and Their Relationships to Industry Standard Testing

Dynamic mechanical and tensile stress-strain properties were measured for four sets of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives, and were compared to industry standard “applications” peel and shear properties. Correlations were established showing that more than half of the range of performance shown by commercial PSA's is controlled by the bulk mechanical properties of the adhesive polymer. A few exceptions stand out clearly. Also, room temperature performance properties were found to correlate better with DMA at higher temperatures than with room temperature DMA. The contribution of tensile properties to peel strength and failure mode is discussed. The results can be used to relate PSA performance to well-known concepts in other areas of materials science, e.g. fracture toughness, rubber elasticity, and rheology, and to key variables in the adhesive formulation or selection process.     

Effect of solubility and miscibility on the adhesion behavior of polymer‐coated carbon fibers with vinyl ester resins

Interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of carbon fibers with vinyl ester resin was investigated as a function of the structure of the polymer coating on carbon fibers via microdroplet tests. For coating carbon fibers, high‐performance polymers such as poly(arylene ether phosphine oxide) (PEPO), Udel® P‐1700, and Ultem® 1000, water‐soluble poly(hydroxy ether ethanol amine) (PHEA), water‐dispersed carboxy‐modified poly(hydroxy ether) (C‐PHE), and water‐insoluble poly(hydroxy ether) (PHE) were utilized. Adhesion of polymers to carbon fibers was also evaluated and the failure surface of the fibers was analyzed by SEM to understand the adhesion mechanism. Diffusion between polymers and vinyl ester resins was investigated and the solubility parameters of the polymers were calculated, with the results being correlated to the IFSS. A highly enhanced IFSS was obtained with PEPO coating, while marginally improved IFSS resulted from PHE, Udel®, and C‐PHE coatings. However, PHEA and Ultem® coatings showed no improvement. Such results were attributed to the extent of solubility and/or miscibility of polymer coatings in vinyl ester resin, with better solubility and miscibility leading to a higher IFSS. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 1042–1053, 2001     

Effects of chemical structure of polyurethane‐based low‐profile additives on the miscibility,curing behavior,volume shrinkage,glass transition temperatures,and mechanical properties for styrene/unsaturated polyester/low‐profile additive ternary systems. I: Miscibility,curing behavior,and volume shrinkage

The effects of chemical structure and molecular weight of three series of thermoplastic polyurethane‐based (PU) low‐profile additives (LPA) on the miscibility of styrene (ST)/unsaturated polyester (UP) resin/LPA ternary systems prior to reaction were investigated by using the Flory‐Huggins theory and group contribution methods. The reaction kinetics during the cure at 110°C and the cured sample morphology were also studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The phase‐separation characteristics of ST/UP/LPA systems during the cure, as revealed by the cured‐sample morphology, and the DSC reaction‐rate profile, could be generally predicted by the calculated upper critical solution temperature for the uncured ST/UP/LPA systems. Finally, based on the measurements for volume change and microvoid formation, volume shrinkage characteristics for the cured ST/UP/LPA systems have been explored. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 543–557, 2000