A quadtree data structure for the coupled finite‐element/element‐free Galerkin method

In the present paper, we derive an efficient data structure for the organization of the nodes in the coupled finite element/element‐free Galerkin method. With respect to its implementation, we compare various approaches of recursive spatial discretizations that facilitate most flexible handling of the nodes. The goal of the paper is to refine the implementation issues of the data structure which is fundamental to the element‐free Galerkin method and thus to speed‐up this otherwise computationally rather expensive meshfree method. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

无网格Galerkin法的理论进展及其应用研究

无网格Galerkin(Element-free Galerkin,EFG)法是无网格方法中应用比较广泛的一种,在介绍其基本特点和原理的基础上,对其移动最小二乘近似过程中涉及到的基函数、权函数的选择、影响域半径的确定等方面取得的新进展进行了介绍.并针对本征边界条件的满足,离散和积分方案的实施,自适应分析及误差分析的应用等一系列相关问题的研究现状及取得的成果进行了详细阐述.同时以受均布载荷的悬臂梁为例,编制了EFG平面弹性程序,验证了EFG法的可行性.最后针对EFG法存在的不足,提出了几个研究方向.     

Boundary element‐free method (BEFM) and its application to two‐dimensional elasticity problems

In this study, we first discuss the moving least‐square approximation (MLS) method. In some cases, the MLS may form an ill‐conditioned system of equations so that the solution cannot be correctly obtained. Hence, in this paper, we propose an improved moving least‐square approximation (IMLS) method. In the IMLS method, the orthogonal function system with a weight function is used as the basis function. The IMLS has higher computational efficiency and precision than the MLS, and will not lead to an ill‐conditioned system of equations. Combining the boundary integral equation (BIE) method and the IMLS approximation method, a direct meshless BIE method, the boundary element‐free method (BEFM), for two‐dimensional elasticity is presented. Compared to other meshless BIE methods, BEFM is a direct numerical method in which the basic unknown quantity is the real solution of the nodal variables, and the boundary conditions can be applied easily; hence, it has higher computational precision. For demonstration purpose, selected numerical examples are given. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Constraint‐corrected J–R curve based on three‐dimensional finite element analyses

Three‐dimensional (3D) finite element analyses are carried out on single‐edge bend [SE(B)] specimens for which the J‐integral resistance curves (J–R curves) have been experimentally determined to develop the constraint‐corrected J–R curves for the X80 grade pipe steel. The constraint parameters considered in this study include Q_HRR, Q_SSY, Q_{SSY_m}, Q_LM, Q_BM1, Q_BM2, A₂, h and T_z. The constraint‐corrected J–R curves were developed on the basis of the constraint parameters obtained from finite element analysis and experimentally determined J–R curves associated with deeply cracked and medium‐cracked SE(B) specimens and validated against shallow‐cracked SE(B) specimens. The analysis results indicate that all the constraint parameters considered in this study except Q_HRR, Q_SSY, Q_{SSY_m} and Q_LM lead to reasonably accurate constraint‐corrected J–R curves if the crack extensions are relatively small (≤0.7 mm). For larger crack extensions (≤1.5 mm), the Q_BM1‐based constraint‐corrected J–R curve leads to the most accurate predictions of J among all the constraint parameters considered.