Influence of morphology on rheological and mechanical properties of SEBS-toughened,glass-bead-filled isotactic polypropene

The influence of morphology of glass-bead-filled isotactic polypropene containing 0–20 vol% thermoplastic elastomers (TPE) on mechanical and rheological properties was investigated. Polystyrene-block-poly(ethene-co-but-1-ene)-block-polystyrene(SEBS) and the corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydrid (SEBS-g-MA) were used as thermoplastic elastomers, realizing, in the first case, a three-phase morphology with separately dispersed glass beads and SEBS particles. In the second case, SEBS-g-MA forms an elastomeric interlayer between glass beads and polypropene matrix, comprising core–shell particles. Young's modulus and tensile yield stress of the hybrid composites decrease with an increase in TPE volume fraction due to low stiffness and strength of TPE. In comparison with the three-phase morphology of hybrid composites with SEBS, SEBS-g-MA interlayers effect a reduced stiffness of the hybrid composites but improve interfacial adhesion and, thus, tensile yield stress. Rheological storage and loss moduli increase with an increase in glass bead and TPE volume fraction. Due to improved interfacial adhesion, melt elasticity and viscosity are enhanced by the SEBS-g-MA interlayer when compared with separately dispersed SEBS. Consequently, the reduced stiffening effect of the glass beads due to SEBS-g-MA interlayer decreases mechanical elasticity, whereas improved interfacial adhesion, also promoted by the SEBS-g-MA interlayer, enhances tensile yield stress and melt elasticity. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 2499–2506, 1998     

Comparison of isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylene as matrix materials of hybrid composites

The structure/property relationships and morphology of glass bead–reinforced syndiotactic and isotactic polypropylene composites containing 0 to 20 vol% thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) were studied. Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene-co-butylene)-block-polystyrene (SEBS) and the corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MA) were used as the TPEs. The Young's modulus of hybrid composites based on s-PP showed no dependence on the type of TPE used, whereas i-PP hybrid composites containing SEBS had a higher Young's modulus than composites containing SEBS-g-MA. A comparison of the data with theoretical predictions of Young's modulus and tensile yield stress gave strong evidence of two different morphologies for the hybrid composites. The increasing tensile yield stress of s-PP hybrid composites and i-PP hybrid composites containing SEBS-g-MA was attributed to an interlayer formation and in-situ encapsulation of glass beads, which resulted in core-shell particles with improved interfacial interactions. In contrast, SEBS in hybrid composites based on i-PP formed a separate dispersed phase. Crystallization and scanning electron microscopy studies also provided evidence of a core-shell morphology for hybrid composites based on s-PP. Results of lap-shear and peel tests confirmed strong interfacial interaction between glass and SEBS-g-MA and between SEBS and s-PP as well as i-PP. Only above a critical volume fraction did the TPE provide significant improvement of the notched Izod impact strength of hybrid composites based on s-PP or i-PP.     

Optimum toughening via a bicontinuous blending: toughening of PPO with SEBS and SEBS-g-maleic anhydride

The poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) was toughened by melt extrusion through its blending with a styrene-b-ethylene/butadiene-b-styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS), or with maleic anhydride (MA) grafted SEBS (SEBS-g-MA). Their morphology, mechanical properties, and rheology have been investigated. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that both kinds of blends had an island-sea structure at low concentrations of SEBS or SEBS-g-MA and a bicontinuous one at sufficiently high concentrations. However, the percolation threshold was higher for SEBS than for the SEBS-g-MA. The Izod impact strength of PPO could be significantly improved through its blending with SEBS-g-MA, particularly in a blend with 20 wt% of SEBS-g-MA at which it had a maximum value. The rheological experiments indicated that the incorporation of SEBS increased and that of SEBS-g-MA decreased the melt viscosity of the system.     

Microstructural characteristics of glass bead‐ and wollastonite‐filled isotactic‐polypropylene composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers

Microstructural characteristics of isotactic‐polypropylene/glass bead (iPP/GB) and iPP/wollastonite (iPP/W) composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers, poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) copolymer (SEBS) and corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA), were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA) showed that the iPP/SEBS and iPP/SEBS‐g‐MA blends were partially compatible two‐phase systems. Well‐dispersed spherical GB and acicular W particles without evidence of interfacial adhesion were observed in the iPP/GB and iPP/W binary composites respectively. Contrary to the blends, melt flow rates of the iPP/GB and PP/W composites decreased more with SEBS‐g‐MA than with SEBS because of enhanced interfacial adhesion with SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer. The SEM analyses showed that the ternary composites containing SEBS exhibited separate dispersion of the rigid filler and elastomer particles (i.e., separate microstructure). However, SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer not only encapsulated the spherical GB and acicular W particles completely with strong interfacial adhesion (i.e., core‐shell microstructure) but also dispersed separately throughout iPP matrix. In accordance with the SEM observations, the DSC and DMA revealed quantitatively that the rigid filler and SEBS particles in iPP matrix acted individually, whereas the rigid filler particles in the ternary composites containing SEBS‐g‐MA acted like elastomer particles because of the thick elastomer interlayer around the filler particles. The Fourier transform infrared analyses revealed an esterification reaction inducing the strong interfacial adhesion between the SEBS‐g‐MA phase and the filler particles. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1265–1284, 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of rubber particle size and rubber type on the mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced, rubber-toughened nylon 6

The effects of rubber type and particle size on the mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced blends of nylon 6 and EPR/EPR-gMA or SEBS/SEBS-g-MA were investigated; rubber particle size in the two systems could be controlled by varying the ratio of EPR to EPR-g-MA or SEBS to SEBS-g-MA. Unreinforced materials with the highest levels of toughness did not necessarily lead to the highest fracture energy when reinforced with 15 wt% glass fibers. Materials toughened with SEBS/SEBS-gMA, which are tougher in the absence of glass fibers had lower fracture energies when 15 wt% glass fibers are present. In general, smaller rubber particles led to higher fracture energies. Fracture analysis according to a modified essential work of fracture analysis reveals that SEBS/SEBS-g-MA have high values of the dissipative energy density, u_d, in the absence of glass fibers. When 15 wt% glass fibers are added, u_d is essentially zero for all the materials tested. The limiting specific fracture energy, u₀, on the other hand, was higher for both unreinforced and glass fiber reinforced EPR/EPR-g-MA toughened blends than for SEBS/SEBS-g-MA based materials. Transmission electron microscopy observations of fractured specimens indicate that glass fibers decrease the size of the damage zone of rubber toughened nylon 6. Shear yielding was seen in fractured specimens of reinforced nylon 6 blends containing either SEBS/SEBS-g-MA or EPR-g-MA, but the size of this shear yielded zone was larger for EPR/EPR-g-MA. In addition, EPR/EPR-g-MA based materials displayed craze-like deformations, while SEBS-g-MA materials did not exhibit this deformation process.     

Toughness improvement of novel biobased aromatic polyamide/SEBS/organoclay ternary hybrids

Biobased aromatic polyamide/organoclay (Cloisite30B, C30B) nanocomposites were melt-compounded with reactive and nonreactive styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) rubbers at different weight contents to form ternary and quaternary blends. The mechanical properties were investigated as a function of the blend composition. The elongation at break and the impact strength increase with increasing SEBS rubber content, whereas the Young's modulus logically decreases proportionally to SEBS amount. Extra addition of SEBS grafted maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MA) induces a synergistic effect. The SEBS-g-MA makes it possible to limit the aforementioned rigidity loss and to greatly increase the impact strength. The critical strain energy release rate increases significantly when both reactive and nonreactive rubbers are combined. Three types of microstructures appear depending on the blend composition: (1) small and numerous well-dispersed particles when reactive rubber is used, (2) about 10 times bigger and less numerous well-dispersed particles in the case of nonreactive rubber, and (3) a flocculated dispersion of small particles when both reactive and nonreactive rubber are added. Finally, the polyamide performances were significantly increased when the flocculated morphology was noticed due to a better PAXD/SEBS interfacial adhesion given by the SEBS-g-MA compatibilization and to a thinner rubber distribution in the matrix. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020 , 137, 48888.     

Rheological behaviors of glass bead‐ and wollastonite‐filled polypropylene composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers

Steady‐ and oscillatory‐shear rheological behaviors of polypropylene/glass bead (PP/GB) and PP/wollastonite (PP/W) melts modified with thermoplastic elastomers, poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) copolymer (SEBS) and the corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA), were examined by means of a parallel‐plate rheometer. With adding the elastomers (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) and fillers (spherical GB and acicular W) to PP, viscosity especially at low shear rates and shear‐thinning flow behavior at high shear rates were pronounced as evidenced quantitatively by Carreau–Yasuda (CY) parameters, but Cox–Merz analogy became weakened. Besides, melt‐elasticity in terminal region and relaxation time (t_c) in crossing point increased, indicating an enhancement in quasi‐solid behavior of molten PP. Comparing with the elastomers, rheological behaviors of molten PP were more influenced with adding the rigid fillers, especially with W due to distinct acicular shape of W particles. SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer more affected rheological behaviors of the ternary composites than SEBS elastomer, implying that SEBS elastomer and the filler particles behaved individually (i.e., development of separate microstructure) in (PP/GB)/SEBS and (PP/W)/SEBS ternary composites, but core‐shell microstructure developed with strong interfacial adhesion by adding SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer, and the filler particles encapsulated with the thick SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer interlayer (i.e., core‐shell particles) acted like neither big elastomer particles nor like individual rigid particles in melt‐state. Moreover, effects of SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer reached a maximum on rheological behaviors of (PP/W)/SEBS‐g‐MA ternary composite, indicating a synergy between core‐shell microstructure and acicular W particles. Correlations between oscillatory‐shear flow properties and microstructures of the blends and composites were evaluated using Cole–Cole (CC), Han–Chuang (HC), and van Gurp–Palmen (vGP) plots. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics     

Mechanical properties of glass bead‐ and wollastonite‐filled isotactic‐polypropylene composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers

Mechanical properties of the isotactic‐polypropylene/glass bead (iPP/GB) and iPP/wollastonite (iPP/W) composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers, the poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) copolymer (SEBS) and corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA), were investigated. An increase in toughness of iPP with the elastomers was associated with a decrease in rigidity and strength. Mechanical performance of iPP increased more with acicular W than with spherical GB due to reinforcing effect of W. Comparing the (iPP/GB)/SEBS and (iPP/W)/SEBS composites having the separate microstructure, strength and toughness values of the iPP/GB and iPP/W composites increased more with SEBS‐g‐MA at the expense of rigidity due to the core‐shell microstructure with strong interfacial adhesion. Moreover, the iPP/W composite exhibited superior mechanical performance with 2.5 and 5 vol% of SEBS‐g‐MA because of a positive synergy between the core‐shell microstructure and reinforcing effect of acicular W. The extended models revealed that the elastomer and filler particles in the (iPP/GB)/SEBS and (iPP/W)/SEBS composites acted individually due to the separate microstructure. However, the rigid GB and W particles encapsulated with the thick elastomer interlayer (R₀/R₁ = 0.91) in the (iPP/GB)/SEBS‐g‐MA and (iPP/W)/SEBS‐g‐MA composites acted like neither big elastomer particles nor like individual rigid particles, inferring more complicated failure mechanisms in the core‐shell composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1285–1308, 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Comparison of the toughening behavior of nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide using various maleated elastomers

The toughening effect of two types of elastomers based on ethylene/α-olefin copolymers, viz, an ethylene/propylene copolymer (EPR) with its maleated version, EPR-g-MA, and an ethylene/1-octene copolymer (EOR) with its maleated versions, EOR-g-MA-X% (X=0.35, 1.6, 2.5), for two classes of polyamides: semi-crystalline nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide (Zytel 330 from DuPont), designated as a-PA, was explored. The results are compared with those reported earlier based on a styrenic triblock copolymer having a hydrogenated midblock, SEBS, and its maleated version, SEBS-g-MA, elastomer system. Izod impact strength was examined as a function of rubber content, rubber particle size and temperature. All three factors influence the impact behavior considerably for the two polyamide matrices. The a-PA is found to require a somewhat lower content of rubber for toughening than nylon 6. Very similar optimum ranges of rubber particle sizes were observed for ternary blends of EOR-g-MA/EOR with each of the two polyamides while blends based on mixtures of EPR-g-MA/EPR and SEBS-g-MA/SEBS (where the total rubber content is 20% by weight) show only an upper limit for a-PA but an optimum range of particle sizes for nylon 6 for effective toughening. Higher EPR-g-MA contents lead to lower ductile-brittle transition temperatures (T_db) as expected; however, a-PA binary blends with EPR-g-MA have a much lower T_db than do nylon 6 blends when the content of the maleated elastomer is not high. A minimum in plots of ductile-brittle transition temperature versus particle size appears for ternary blends of each of the matrices with EOR-g-MA/EOR; blends based on SEBS-g-MA/SEBS, in most cases, show higher ductile-brittle transition temperatures, regardless of the matrix. However, blends with EPR-g-MA/EPR show comparable T_db with those based on EOR-g-MA/EOR for the amorphous polyamide but show the lowest ductile-brittle transition temperatures for nylon 6 within the range of particle sizes examined. For the blends with a bimodal size distribution, the global weight average rubber particle size is inappropriate for correlating the Izod impact strength and ductile-brittle transition temperature. In general, trends for this amorphous polyamide are rather similar to those of semi-crystalline nylon 6.     

Effect of Thermoplastic Elastomer on Melt Rheological and Fracture Behavior of Poly(Lactic Acid)

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) was melt blended with thermoplastic elastomer, maleic anhydride grafted poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS-g-MA) copolymer with varied concentration (10–40?wt%) using twin screw extruder. Dynamic rheological behavior of PLA/SEBS-g-MA blends investigated a transition from liquid-like behavior to solid-like behavior in the composition range of 10–20?wt% of SEBS-g-MA. The capillary rheometer analysis showed enhanced shear viscosity with increase in SEBS-g-MA content. At 10?wt% of SEBS-g-MA, a maximum in the non-essential work of fracture was observed which reflects resistance to crack propagation. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a transition in deformation mechanisms from voids, to fibrillation and cavitation.     

Morphology and Mechanical Properties of iPP/Silica Composites Modified with (Styrene-b-ethylene-co-butylene-b-styrene) Grafted with Maleic Anhydride

The effects of different silica grades and elastomer content on interfacial properties, morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/silica 96/4 composites modified with added 5, 10, 15, and 20% of poly(styrene-b-ethylene-co-butylene-b-styrene) grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MA) were investigated. The iPP/silica/SEBS-g-MA composites were designed by adding four silica fillers differing in size (nano- vs. micro-) and in surface properties (hydrophilic vs. hydrophobic) and SEBS-g-MA that was used as a proven effective impact modifier and compatibilizer simultaneously. The morphology of every composite was a spectrum of several morphologies rather than one exclusive morphology. Good concordance between observed and predicted morphology indicated that the morphology of a particular composite was controlled primarily by interfacial properties. Tensile and impact properties were influenced primarily by competitive effects of a stiff filler and tough SEBS-g-MA elastomer. Increased impact strength and strain at break caused by adding SEBS-g-MA indicated a significant overcoming of the elastomeric toughening effect in relation to the filler’s stiffening effect.     

Mechanical properties of wollastonite‐reinforced polypropylene composites modified with SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA elastomers

Mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene/wollastonite/styrene rubber block copolymers (iPP/wollastonite/SRBC) composites were studied as a function of elastomeric poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) triblock copolymer (SEBS) and SEBS grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) content from 0 to 20 vol%. Microphase morphology was stronger influenced by SRBC elastomers than by different wollastonite types. Higher encapsulation ability of SEBS‐g‐MA than SEBS caused more expressive core‐shell morphology and consequently higher notched impact strength as well as yield parameters, but lower Young's modulus. Higher ductility of the composites with SEBS than with SEBS‐g‐MA has been primarily caused by better miscibility of the polypropylene chains with SEBS molecules. Surface properties of components and adhesion parameters also indicated that adhesion at SEBS‐g‐MA/wollastonite interface, which was stronger than the one at the SEBS/wollastonite interface, influenced higher encapsulation of wollastonite particles by SEBS‐g‐MA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1873–1880, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of electron beam irradiation on the structure–property behavior of blends based on low density polyethylene and styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene-block copolymers

Low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends with different additives were exposed to various doses of electron beam irradiation. The additives used were styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene-block copolymers (SEBS), styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene-block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MA) and mineral compounds. The structure–property behavior of electron beam irradiated blends was characterized in terms of mechanical, thermal, and electrical resistivity properties. The results indicated that the unirradiated LDPE blends with the different compositions showed improved mechanical properties, thermal and volume resistivity properties than pure LDPE. However, the improvement in properties of unirradiated blends by using SEBS-g-MA was higher than using SEBS copolymer. Further improvement in the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of the LDPE blends was achieved after electron beam irradiation. The limited oxygen index (LOI) data revealed that the LDPE/SEBS-g-MA/ATH blend was changed from combustible to self-extinguishing material after electron beam irradiation to a dose of 100 kGy. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene blends with styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymers

Blends of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) at compositions 20/80 and 80/20 were modified with three different styrene–ethylene/butyl–ene-styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with the aim of improving the compatibility and in particular the toughness of the blends. The compatibilizers involved an unfunctionalized SEBS and two functionalized grades containing either maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MAH) or glycidyl methacrylate (SEBS-g-GMA) grafted to the midblock. The effects of the compatibilizers were evaluated by studies on morphology and mechanical, thermal and rheological properties of the blends. The additon of 5 wt % of a SEBS copolymer was found to stabilize the blend morphology and to improve the impact strength. The effect was, however, far more pronounced with the functionalized copolymers. Particularly high toughness combined with rather high stiffness was achieved with SEBS-g-GMA for the PET-rich composition. Addition of the functionalized SEBS copolymers resulted in a finer dispersion of the minor phase and clearly improved interfacial adhesion. Shifts in the glass transition temperature of the PET phase and increase in the melt viscosity of the compatibilized blends indicated enhanced interactions between the discrete PET and PP phases induced by the functionalized compatibilizer, in particular SEBS-g-GMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65:241–249, 1997     

Compatibilisation of blends of poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(styrene-block-(ethylene-co-butadiene)-block–styrene) with maleic anhydride grafting

Abstract

The mechanical properties of blends of poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) and poly (styrene-block-(ethylene-co-butadiene)-block–styrene) (SEBS) were investigated using maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS-g-MAH) as a compatibiliser. The results indicated that addition of a small amount of SEBS-g-MAH during melt blending significantly improved the mechanical properties of PVC/SEBS blends. The impact strength of the compatibilised PVC/SEBS blends was found to reach a maximum of 53·5±2·78 KJ m^?2 at room temperature and a maximum of 32·8±1·66 KJ m^?2 at ?20°C at an SEBS-g-MAH loading level of 6 phr. The two glass transition temperatures of the components in the blends converged to some degree upon addition of SEBS-g-MAH for compatibilisation. At room temperature the dynamic storage modulus of the compatibilised blends was higher than that of the blends without compatibilisation. The size of the dispersed phase domains in the blends was appreciably reduced on addition of SEBS-g-MAH during melt blending according to scanning electron microscopy. All the above observations revealed that SEBS-g-MAH enhanced the compatibility between PVC and SEBS in the PVC/SEBS blends.     

The effects of SEBS-g-maleic anhydride reaction on the morphology and properties of polypropylene/PA6/SEBS ternary blends

Ternary blends, based on 70% by weight of polypropylene (PP) with 30% by weight of a dispersed phase, consisting of 15% polyamide-6 (PA6) and 15% of a mixture comprising varying ratios of an unreactive poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS) triblock copolymer and a reactive maleic anhydride-grafted SEBS-g-MA, were produced via melt blending in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. TEM revealed the blend containing only non-reactive SEBS to exhibit individual PA6 and SEBS dispersed phases. However, the progressive replacement of SEBS with reactive SEBS-g-MA increased the degree of interfacial reaction between the SEBS and PA6 phases, thus reducing interfacial tension and providing a driving force for encapsulation of the PA6 by the SEBS. Consequently, the dispersed-phase morphology was observed to transform from two separate phases to acorn-type composite particles, then to individual core-shell particles and finally to agglomerates of the core-shell particles. The resultant blends exhibited significant morphology-induced variations in both thermal and mechanical properties. DSC showed that blends in which the diameter of the PA6 particles was reduced to ≤3 μm by the increasing interfacial reaction exhibited fractionated PA6 crystallisation. In general, mechanical testing showed the blends to exhibit inferior low-strain tensile properties (modulus and yield stress) compared to the matrix PP, but superior ultimate tensile properties (stress and strain at break) and impact strength. These changes are discussed with reference to composite models.     

Core/shell morphologies in recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low-density polyethylene/poly(styrene-<Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis>-(ethylene-<Emphasis Type="Italic">co</Emphasis>-butylene)-<Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis>-styrene) ternary blends

Compatibilizer plays very important roles in preparing high performance polymer composites, not only for the ternary immiscible polymer blends, but also for the recycled and reused of waste plastics mixture. Generally, the compatibilizers can be used as the toughening agent in blending polymer materials. In the present work, the poly(styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene) (SEBS) or maleic anhydride-grafted poly(styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene) (SEBS-g-MA) acts as the compatibilizer and toughening agent for the preparation of R-PET/LDPE/SEBS (70/20/10) ternary blends. It must be pointed that the ternary blends are costlessly and conveniently prepared from the recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R-PET) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) through a melt blending in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder and injection moulded. The morphologies of the ternary blends are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was found that the blends contains reactive or non-reactive compatibilizer, the morphology originates from the LLDPE particles encapsulated by both SEBS and SEBS-g-MA. So, it results to the reduced interfacial tension between of the R-PET and SEBS-g-MA, in which the grafted chains of PET-g-SEBS-g-MA formed through in situ reaction between R-PET and SEBS-g-MA phases. Therefore, core–shell particles with smaller diameter disperse uniformly in the blends. Moreover, the good compatibilization and corresponding morphologies induce in balanced mechanical and thermal properties. DSC analysis show the dispersed phase particles could act as nucleating agent in the R-PET matrix, which results the improvement of the crystallization temperature. And it was also observed the decreased nucleation activity in graft copolymers in the R-PET/LLDPE/SEBS-g-MA blends. Notched Charpy impact strength and elongation at break are improved by the addition of compatibilizer.     

Morphology and flame‐retardancy properties of ternary high‐impact polystyrene/elastomer/polystyrene‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide composites

The effects of elastomer type on the morphology, flammability, and mechanical properties of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS)/polystyrene (PS)‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide (MH) were investigated. The ternary composites were characterized by cone calorimetry, mechanical testing, and scanning electron microscopy. Morphology was controlled with poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS) triblock copolymer or the corresponding maleinated poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA). The HIPS/SEBS/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited separation of the filler and elastomer, whereas the HIPS/SEBS‐g‐MA/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited encapsulation of the filler by SEBS‐g‐MA. The flame‐retardant and mechanical properties of the ternary composites were strongly dependent on microstructure. The composites with an encapsulation structure showed higher flame‐retardant properties than those with a separation structure at the optimum use level of SEBS‐g‐MA. Furthermore, the composites with a separation structure showed a higher modulus and impact strength than those with an encapsulation structure. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Process–structure–property relationship in ternary short‐glass‐fiber/elastomer/polypropylene composites

Short‐glass‐fiber (SGF)‐reinforced polypropylene (PP) composites toughened with a styrene/ethylene butylene/styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymer were injection molded after extrusion. Furthermore, a maleic anhydride (MA)‐grafted SEBS copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) was used as an impact modifier and compatibilizer. The effects of the processing conditions and compatibilizer on the microstructure and tensile and impact performance of the hybrid composites were investigated. In the route 1 fabrication process, SGF, PP, and SEBS were blended in an extruder twice, and this was followed by injection molding. In route 2, or the sequential blending process, the elastomer and PP were mixed thoroughly before the addition of SGF. In other words, either PP and SEBS or PP and SEBS‐g‐MA pellets were premixed in an extruder. The produced pellets were then blended with SGF in the extruder, and this was followed by injection molding. The SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP hybrid fabricated by the route 2 process exhibited the highest modulus, yield stress, tensile stress at break, Izod impact energy, and Charpy drop weight impact strength among the composites investigated. This was due to the formation of a homogeneous SEBS elastomeric interlayer at the SGF and matrix interface of the SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP hybrid. This SEBS rubbery layer enhanced the interfacial bonding between SGF and the matrix of the SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP hybrid. The correlations between the processing, microstructure, and properties of the hybrids were investigated. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 1384–1392, 2003     

The effect of polyamide end-group configuration on morphology and toughness of blends with maleated elastomers

The effect of polyamide end-group configuration on morphology generation and toughness of blends with maleated elastomers was investigated. Two difunctional polyamides, a copolymer containing 15% nylon 6,6 and an amine enriched nylon 6, were compared to monofunctional nylon 6 materials of equivalent molecular weight and melt viscosity. Difunctional polyamides have some chains with amine groups on both ends capable of reacting with the maleated rubber phase resulting in crosslinking-type effects. The elastomers used included styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers with a hydrogenated midblock, SEBS, and versions with X% grafted maleic anhydride, SEBS-g-MA-X%, and a maleated ethylene/propylene random copolymer, EPR-g-MA. Blends based on difunctional polyamides form large, complex rubber particles when compounded in a single-screw extruder; however, by compounding with an appropriate twin-screw extruder, the size and complexity of the particles can be reduced to levels similar to blends with the monofunctional nylon 6 controls. Measurement of the extent of reaction between the amine end groups and the grafted maleic anhydride revealed that a larger number of amine groups are consumed for the difunctional polyamides than for their monofunctional controls. The room-temperature Izod impact strength of blends with the difunctional polyamides is greater than are the corresponding blends with the controls; however, subambient toughness depends mainly on the inherent ductility of the polyamide matrix. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.