Inability of the activated partial thromboplastin time to predict heparin levels. Time to reassess guidelines for heparin assays

BACKGROUND: In treating venous thromboembolic disorders, patient outcomes appear to correlate with heparin levels. Due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations, a relationship between heparin dose and level cannot be reliably predicted in individual patients. Some patients have low heparin levels despite therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), which may increase their risk for recurrent thromboembolism. Patients with high heparin requirements appear to have fewer bleeding episodes with heparin level-guided therapy. The aPTT does not reliably correlate with heparin blood concentrations or antithrombotic effects. Consequently, heparin therapy monitored with heparin levels may be more effective and safer. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively determine whether (1) the aPTT therapeutic range adequately predicts heparin levels in 38 patients used to establish the therapeutic aPTT range as is currently recommended and (2) whether 3 paired sets of aPTT-antifactor Xa levels provide the basis for using aPTTs to predict subsequent heparin levels in individual patients (n = 27) receiving intravenous heparin for coronary artery disease or venous thromboembolic disease. RESULTS: In the therapeutic aPTT range established, the R2 value for the relationship was 0.4. Prediction intervals were wide. For an aPTT of 60 seconds, the 95% prediction interval estimates were heparin levels of 0.05 to 1.0 U/mL. In individual patients, the aPTT-antifactor Xa relationship had an average R2 value of 0.75. There was no consistent relationship between the aPTT and anti-factor Xa level in a significant number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aPTT does not appear to be a useful surrogate for heparin levels. These findings suggest that the current recommendations on the use of heparin levels should be expanded.     

Automated heparin-delivery system to control activated partial thromboplastin time: evaluation in normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is used widely; however, control of the level of anticoagulation remains its greatest problem, with fewer than 35% of patients having activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within a range of 55 to 85 seconds in recent trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed and tested a prototype of an automated heparin control system (AutoHep) in which a computer-based titration algorithm adjusted the heparin infusion to reach a target aPTT. In 1 study, 12 healthy male subjects received an intravenous infusion of heparin with the rate determined by AutoHep and were randomized to receive an initial bolus or no bolus of heparin preceding the infusion. A second study evaluated the automated blood sampling system in 12 subjects. Of the 344 end-point aPTT measurements, 78% were within +/-10 seconds of the target (prespecified primary end point), and 89% were within a +/-15-second range. The time to achieve a target aPTT was 93 minutes without and 150 minutes with an initial heparin bolus. The total percentage of time within the target range +/-15 seconds was 46 of 48 hours (96%). The automatic blood sampling system successfully obtained 96% of all scheduled samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the AutoHep system has the potential to significantly improve aPTT control of intravenous heparin compared with current clinical practice.     

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators

BACKGROUND: Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians. METHODS: A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring. RESULTS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I trial

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous heparin is commonly used after thrombolytic therapy, few reports have addressed the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation and clinical outcomes. We examined the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in 29,656 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and analyzed the relationship between the aPTT and both baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intravenous heparin was administered as a 5000-U bolus followed by an initial infusion of 1000 U/h, with dose adjustment to achieve a target aPTT of 60 to 85 seconds. aPTTs were collected 6, 12, and 24 hours after thrombolytic administration. Higher aPTT at 24 hours was strongly related to lower patient weight (P < .00001) as well as older age, female sex, and lack of cigarette smoking (all PT< .0001). At 12 hours, the aPTT associated with the lowest 30-day mortality, stroke, and bleeding rates was 50 to 70 seconds. There was an unexpected direct relationship between the aPTT and the risk of subsequent reinfarction. There was a clustering of reinfarction in the first 10 hours after discontinuation of intravenous heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between aPTT and clinical outcome was confounded to some degree by the influence of baseline prognostic characteristics, aPTTs higher than 70 seconds were found to be associated with higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, bleeding, and reinfarction. These findings suggest that until proven otherwise, we should consider the aPTT range of 50 to 70 seconds as optimal with intravenous heparin after thrombolytic therapy.     

Evaluation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) sensitivity to heparin using five commercial reagents: implications for therapeutic monitoring

Heparin is an effective drug for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic conditions. Although several biological assays have been proposed for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy, the measurement of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is the most widely employed test, and the overall risk of thromboembolic episodes was markedly reduced by maintaining APTT ratios above 1.5. However, the adjustment of the heparin therapy on the basis of APTT presents several questions which are still unresolved. Major discrepancies were found in APTTs performed using different reagents in both ex vivo and in vitro heparinized samples and occasionally with different lots of the same reagents; poor correlation was observed between APTT values and plasma heparin concentrations. In order to gain further insights into this phenomenon, we analysed the sensitivity to heparin of five commercial reagents for APTT measurement in 19 ex vivo heparinized samples. Differences were observed; correlation coefficients ranged from 0.820 to 0.985 and slopes of linear regressions from 0.26 to 1.14. Moreover, unsatisfactory correlations were obtained when APTT ratios were compared with heparin plasma concentrations in the same patients' samples. In the heparin therapeutic range of 0.35 - 0.70 U/ml, reagent-dependent differences were observed in the corresponding APTT values. These results point out a critical role of the assay methodology in monitoring heparin therapy by APTT. We suggest that reference materials and methods should be urgently identified, a universally agreed scale for reporting results should be established and reference ranges for the unfractionated heparin therapy should be reconsidered taking on account the reagent employed.     

Puerperal thromboprophylaxis: comparison of the anti-Xa activity of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin

Low molecular weight heparins are used extensively for thromboprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, 20 mg and 40 mg, given once per day with unfractionated heparin, 7500iu given twice per day, in terms of their anti-Xa activity in puerperal women following caesarean section and with an additional risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Seventeen women were randomised to receive one of the three treatments. The anti-Xa activity associated with each treatment was measured prior to treatment and at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours. The mean anti-Xa values of the groups receiving enoxaparin, 20 mg and 40 mg, were significantly higher than those of the group receiving unfractionated heparin. There was no difference between the two enoxaparin groups in terms of the anti-Xa activity profiles. This study suggests that the use of enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in terms of anti-Xa activity.     

Stenosis of the tubular neck: a possible mechanism for progressive renal failure

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of continuous administration of heparin on platelet function in intensive care patients. DESIGN: Prospective, serial investigation. SETTING: Clinical investigation on a surgical and neurosurgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 45 patients: 15 postoperative with patients sepsis (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score between 15 and 25), 15 trauma patients (Injury Severity Score 15 to 25), and 15 neurosurgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Management of the patients was carried out according to the guidelines for modern intensive care therapy. Sepsis and trauma patients received standard (unfractionated) heparin continuously [aim: an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) approximately 2.0 times normal value; sepsis-heparin and trauma-heparin patients], whereas neurosurgical patients received no heparin (neurosurgical patients). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: From arterial blood samples, platelet aggregation was measured by the turbidimetric method. Platelet aggregation was induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 2.0 mumol/l), collagen (10 micrograms/ml), and epinephrine (25 mumol/l). Measurements were carried out on the day of diagnosis of sepsis or 12 h after hemodynamic stabilization (trauma and neurosurgery patients) (baseline) and during the next 5 days at 12.00 noon. Standard coagulation parameters [platelet count and fibrinogen and antithrombin III (AT III) plasma concentrations] were also monitored. Heparin 4-10 U/kg per h (mean dose: approximately 500 U/h) was necessary to reach an aPTT of about 2.0 times normal. Platelet count was highest in the neurosurgical patients, but it did not decrease after heparin administration to the trauma and sepsis patients. AT III and fibrinogen plasma levels were similar in the three groups of patients. In the sepsis group, platelet aggregation variables decreased significantly (e.g., epinephrine-induced maximum platelet aggregation:-45 relative % from baseline value). Platelet function recovered during the study and even exceeded baseline values (e.g., ADP-induced maximum platelet aggregation: +42.5 relative % from baseline value). Continuous heparinization did not blunt this increase of platelet aggregation variables. In the heparinized trauma patients, platelet aggregation variables remained almost stable and were no different to platelet aggregation data in the untreated neurosurgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous administration of heparin with an average dose of approximately 500 U/h did not negatively influence platelet function in the trauma patients. Recovery from reduced platelet function in the sepsis group was not affected by continuous heparinization. Thus, continuous heparinization with this dose appears to be safe with regard to platelet function in the intensive care patient.     

Effect of intravenous heparin infusion on thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A in unstable angina

BACKGROUND: In unstable angina, the clinical efficacy of heparin is limited in time, and recurrence of adverse events has been reported after discontinuation of the anticoagulant. METHODS: In 21 episodes of unstable angina, we used the plasma level of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) to evaluate the pattern of thrombin inhibition by heparin and the effect of stopping heparin and initiating aspirin. RESULTS: At admission, the plasma level of FPA was increased: median value 3.7 ng/mL compared with 5.5 ng/mL in a control group of 20 patients with early myocardial infarction (not significant). The following findings were observed during a 4-day course of intravenous heparin infusion: (1) FPA decreased significantly 6 hours after the start of therapy; (2) FPA was lower when activated partial thromboplastic time (aPTT) was >1.5 times baseline; (3) there was a significant negative correlation between aPTT and FPA. Twenty-four hours after heparin was discontinued and aspirin initiated, a significant increase in TAT and FPA in plasma was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm ongoing fibrin formation in the active phase of unstable angina, indicate incomplete and variable inhibition of thrombin by heparin during continuous infusion, and suggest a risk of re-emergence of thrombosis (in spite of initiating aspirin) 24 hours after withdrawal of heparin. Data demonstrate a better control of thrombin activity when heparin is infused at rates that maintain aPTT at >1.5 times baseline, as currently recommended in unstable angina.     

Inhibition by heparin of thrombin-catalyzed activation of the factor VIII-von Willebrand factor complex

The activation of factor VIII (fVIII) by thrombin is associated with heavy chain cleavages at Arg372 and Arg740 and light chain cleavage at Arg1689. In a defined, plasma-free assay of fVIII activation and at physiological ionic strength and pH, heparin inhibited the rate of activation of either human or porcine fVIII by thrombin in either the presence or absence of von Willebrand factor (vWf). The inhibitory effect of heparin was associated with inhibition of all three thrombin-catalyzed bond cleavages. At plasma concentrations of fVIII (approximately 1 nM) and vWf (approximately 35 nM), the rate of fVIII activation was inhibited by 50% at approximately 0.1 unit/ml heparin, which is below the normal range of heparin concentrations in plasma during therapeutic anticoagulation (0.2-0.7 unit/ml). We propose that, in addition to catalyzing the inhibition of thrombin and other intrinsic pathway coagulation proteases by antithrombin, heparin functions as an anticoagulant by direct inhibition of the activation of the fVIII-vWf complex by thrombin.     

Preparation of lyophilized partial thromboplastin time reagent composed of synthetic phospholipids: usefulness for monitoring heparin therapy

To contribute to the development of a reference reagent for monitoring heparin therapy, a lyophilized partial thromboplastin time (PTT) reagent was prepared from synthetic dioleoylphosphatidylcholine, dioleoylphosphatidylserine, and dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine, with colloidal silica as activator. The reagent, coded 91/558, was contained in sealed glass ampoules; it deteriorated in a heat degradation experiment, but its activity remained constant for at least 4 years when stored at -70 degrees C. Within- and between-run precision with this reagent complied with the requirements proposed by the International Committee for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Panel on PTT. The response of this reagent and of two other reagents to heparin added to pooled normal plasma was nonlinear. Citrated samples from 58 patients receiving intravenous heparin and from 24 apparently healthy volunteers were tested with reagent 91/558, with Automated APTT (Organon Teknika), with Manchester APTT reagent, with an antifactor Xa assay, and with an anti-factor IIa assay. The correlation of APTT with anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity was poor. The best correlation was observed between reagent 91/558 and the Organon Teknika reagent. Correlations were improved when individual patients' samples were replaced by pooled plasmas from heparinized patients, in whom the effect of oral anticoagulation was minimal. These results suggest that preparation of a lyophilized synthetic phospholipid reagent is feasible for use in monitoring heparin therapy.     

Oral delivery of anticoagulant doses of heparin. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study in humans

BACKGROUND: Parenteral heparin is the anticoagulant of choice in hospitalized patients. Continued anticoagulation is achieved by subcutaneous administration of low-molecular-weight heparin or with an orally active anticoagulant such as warfarin. An oral heparin formulation would avoid the inconvenience of subcutaneous injection and the unfavorable drug interactions and adverse events associated with warfarin. A candidate delivery agent, sodium N-[8(-2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino]caprylate (SNAC), was evaluated with escalating oral heparin doses in a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study for safety, tolerability, and effects on indexes of anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Increases in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), anti-factors IIa and Xa, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentrations were detected when normal volunteers were dosed with 10.5 g SNAC/20000 IU heparin by gavage in some subjects. For the entire group, 30000 IU SNAC and heparin elevated TFPI from 74.9+/-7.6 to 254.2+/-12.3 mg/mL (P<0.001) 1 hour after dosing (P<0.001). Similar changes occurred in anti-factor IIa and anti-factor Xa. aPTT rose from 28+/-0.5 to 42.2+/-6.3 seconds 2 hours after dosing (P<0.01). No significant changes in vital signs, physical examination, ECGs, or clinical laboratory values were observed. Neither 30000 IU heparin alone nor 10.5 g SNAC alone altered the hemostatic parameters. Emesis was associated with 10.5 g SNAC. A taste-masked preparation of SNAC 2.25 g was administered orally with heparin 30000 to 150000 IU. Both aPTT and anti-factor Xa increased with escalating doses of heparin. This preparation was well tolerated. Conclusions-Heparin, administered orally in combination with the delivery agent SNAC, produces significant elevations in 4 indexes of anticoagulant effect in healthy human volunteers. These results establish the feasibility of oral delivery of anticoagulant doses of heparin in humans and may have broader implications for the absorption of macromolecules.     

Experiences and consequences of pain in persons with post-polio syndrome

An improved protamine-sensitive electrode based on a polymeric membrane doped with the charged ion exchanger dinonylnaphthalenesulfonate (DNNS) is used for monitoring heparin concentrations in whole blood. The electrode exhibits significant nonequilibrium potentiometric response to polycationic protamine over the concentration range of 0.5-20 mg/L in undiluted whole-blood samples. The sensor can serve as a simple end point detector for the determination of heparin via potentiometric titrations with protamine. Whole-blood heparin concentrations determined by the electrode method (n > or = 157) correlate well with other protamine titration-based methods, including the commercial Hepcon HMS assay (r = 0.934) and a previously reported potentiometric heparin sensor-based method (r = 0.973). Reasonable correlation was also found with a commercial chromogenic anti-Xa heparin assay (r = 0.891) with corresponding plasma samples and appropriate correction for whole-blood hematocrit levels. Whereas a significant positive bias (0.62 kU/L; P < 0.001) is observed between the anti-Xa assay and the protamine sensor methods, insignificant bias is observed between the protamine sensor and the Hepcon HMS tests (0.08 kU/L; P = 0.02). The possibility of fully automating these titrations offers a potentially simple, inexpensive, and accurate method for monitoring heparin concentrations in whole blood.     

Heparin-induced hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients: comparison of low molecular weight and unfractionated heparin

Aldosterone suppression and subsequent hyperkalemia are well described reversible side effects of prolonged treatment with heparin. This study was designed to examine whether the discontinuous use of heparin three times a week to prevent thrombosis formation during hemodialysis sessions could also induce hypoaldosteronism and might contribute to increased predialysis kalemia in hemodialysis patients. Two different heparinization regimens were prospectively compared in a crossover study of 11 chronic hemodialysis patients. During 2 consecutive weeks, the patients were dialyzed each week with either their usual doses of unfractionated heparin (UH) (6,160 IU +/- 1,350 IU) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (15 anti-Xa activity [aXa] U/kg + 5 aXa U/kg/h). In all but 2 patients, the predialysis level of plasma K+ was higher with UH than with LMWH, and the mean value was higher (5.66+/-0.83 versus 5.15+/-0.68 mM, p = 0.01) while no differences in the predialysis plasma concentrations of creatinine, phosphate, urea, and bicarbonate were observed, excluding the potential role of differences in diet and dialysis efficacy in explaining the higher plasma K+ concentration with UH. The mean plasma aldosterone to plasma renin activity (pRA) ratio was higher with LMWH than with UH (149.54+/-123.1 versus 111.91+/-86.22 pg/ng/ h, p < 0.05). Individual plasma aldosterone values were found to be correlated to pRAs both during the UH period and the LMWH period, and the slope of the positive linear relation between plasma aldosterone and pRA was lower during the UH treatment period (63 versus 105 pg/ng/h). Finally, a negative linear correlation was found between the differences in individual predialysis plasma K+ observed during the 2 protocols and the differences in the corresponding plasma aldosterone levels, suggesting a link between the higher kalemia and the lower aldosterone responsiveness to angiotensin with unfractionated heparin. Although it cannot be concluded whether or not LMWH inhibits aldosterone synthesis, should LMWH decrease aldosterone production, this side effect is 33% less marked than that of UH so that the predialysis plasma K+ levels are 10% lower. This property makes LMWH use preferable to that of UH in patients with elevated predialysis kalemia.     

Changes in plasma epinephrine concentration and in heart rate during head-up tilt testing in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: correlation with successful therapy with beta-receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement and evaluate an effective and efficient heparin nomogram. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective data collection. SETTING: Coronary care unit (CCU) of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes requiring intravenous (i.v.) heparin who were not receiving thrombolytic and/or warfarin therapy. INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective chart review of 52 CCU patients receiving iv heparin provided the historical control group. The effectiveness of a heparin nomogram (5000 U bolus followed by an initial weight-based infusion of 15 U/kg/h with subsequent rate adjustments according to activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] results) was then prospectively assessed in a further 56 consecutive patients. MAIN RESULTS: The historical control and nomogram groups did not significantly differ with respect to age, weight, duration of therapy or total number of aPTTs drawn. Approximately 79% and 84% of patients in the control and nomogram groups, respectively, achieved an aPTT within the therapeutic range (60 to 90 s, P > 0.05), whereas 89% and 100% of control and nomogram patients, respectively, surpassed the therapeutic threshold (longer than 60 s) at some point during treatment (P = 0.009). Compared with empiric dose adjustment, the nomogram more effectively avoided periods of inadequate anticoagulation. Similarly, the time to achieve the therapeutic threshold was significantly longer in the control than in the nomogram group (8.2 +/- 5.9 versus 6.7 +/- 3.7 h, P = 0.026). No adverse bleeding events were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional approaches, the heparin nomogram successfully achieved and maintained adequate anticoagulation in a greater proportion of patients with acute cardiovascular diseases without the need for additional aPTT measurements.     

The effect of N-alkyloxycarbonyl group on the anticonvulsant activities of N-alkyloxycarbonyl-alpha-aminoglutarimides

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of heparin therapy on the international normalized ratio (INR). In vitro heparin sensitivity curves were created using normal and warfarinized plasma samples from patients. The INR results were measured with each of two reagents. In addition, a comparison of INR values with these two reagents was performed on plasma from patients receiving therapeutic heparin and warfarin. The INR values were measured before and after heparin removal with a heparin adsorbent system. While one of the reagents was found to be sensitive to even low levels of therapeutic heparin, the other thromboplastin was resistant up to at least 0.9 U/mL. The INR values determined for patients with one of the reagents were found to be erroneously elevated by an average of 16%. The error ranged from 2% to 55% depending on the in vivo heparin concentration. With the other reagent, the INR values were not substantially affected by heparin. Previous studies have described the effect or lack thereof of heparin on the prothrombin time. The present study demonstrates that the degree to which INR results are prolonged by heparin therapy depends on the reagent formulation. As the therapeutic index for monitoring warfarin is relatively narrow (2.0-3.0), an INR value that is falsely elevated due to reagent sensitivity may precipitate premature cessation of heparin therapy and place certain patients at risk for recurrent thrombosis in the short term.     

Accuracy of coagulation values obtained from a heparinized central venous catheter

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To compare coagulation values of blood samples drawn from heparinized central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripheral veins. DESIGN: Correlational. SETTING: Adult, acute-care hematology/oncology unit in a 1,000-bed teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Twelve adult patients with cancer who had varied diagnoses and patent CVCs. METHODS: Simultaneous blood samples were drawn from the CVC and a peripheral vein and were tested for prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: PT and aPTT values. FINDINGS: PT and aPTT values were significantly prolonged in samples drawn from CVCs when compared to peripherally drawn samples. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate coagulation values cannot be obtained from a heparinized CVC. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Blood for coagulation values should be obtained from peripheral veni-puncture. Further research should explore the effects of various catheters, heparin dwell time, and systemic anticoagulation on coagulation values.     

Glucosamine

We have taken a stepwise approach to improving the dosing of continuous intravenous heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Our primary objective was to use computer modeling to develop a nomogram for managing heparin therapy and to put in place a continuous quality monitoring system to evaluate the nomogram's effectiveness. We prospectively collected data on 41 patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who were treated with heparin. Their response to heparin was computer modeled and the dose to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio of 2.0 was established. This dose was regressed against all demographic characteristics to establish predictors of heparin dose (phase I). The regression formula was used prospectively in 110 patients to initiate the infusion rate of heparin and a bolus dose to achieve an aPTT ratio of 2.5. Subsequent dosage adjustments were achieved by computer modeling the patient's aPTT response (phase II). A nomogram was developed that simulated the decisions achieved using computer-assisted methods. This was retrospectively tested and then prospectively tested in 50 patients using nursing staff (phase IV). The nomogram was then made generally available (phase IV) and has been tested in an additional 310 patients. Phase I: Of the original 41 patients, 32% of the aPTT ratios were in the therapeutic range, 36% were supratherapeutic, and 32% were subtherapeutic after the first 24 hours. Phases II and III resulted in 85% of the aPTT ratios between 1.5 and 2.5 at 24 hours. Phase 4 had similar results in 310 patients. The use of computer-assisted or a computer-generated nomogram to adjust heparin therapy results in better control of heparin therapy than using standard methods.     

Inhibition of repetitive thrombus formation in the stenosed canine coronary artery by enoxaparin, but not by unfractionated heparin

Experiments were designed to compare the antithrombotic efficacy of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UH) in a model of platelet-dependent cyclic flow reductions (CFRs) in the stenosed canine circumflex coronary artery. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are safe and effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The present experiments were designed to evaluate the potential use of LMWHs in arterial thrombotic indications by comparing the antithrombotic effect of an LMWH with that of UH in an animal model of unstable angina. After establishment of consistent CFRs by experimentally induced vascular stenosis and damage, vehicle (saline), enoxaparin, or UH was administered intravenously as a loading dose plus a continuous infusion for 1 hour. The inhibition of CFRs was taken as an indicator of antithrombotic efficacy. Enoxaparin inhibited repetitive platelet thrombus formation in a dose-dependent manner, with significant inhibition of CFRs achieved at 0.5 mg/kg + 5 microg/kg per minute. This dose of enoxaparin resulted in anti-Xa levels of 0.9 to 1.0 IU/mL, anti-IIa levels of 0.2 to 0.3 IU/mL, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of 1.3-fold over baseline, and a 1.4-fold increase (NS) in template bleeding time. Near-complete abolishment of CFRs was achieved with enoxaparin at 1.0 mg/kg + 10 microg/kg per minute. This dose of enoxaparin produced anti-Xa levels of 2 to 2.2 IU/mL, anti-IIa levels of 0.5 to 0.6 IU/mL, an increase in APTT of 1.4- to 1.5-fold over baseline, and a 1.9-fold increase (P<0.05) in template bleeding time. In contrast, UH had no significant effect on CFRs at a dose (100 U/kg + 10 U/kg per minute) that resulted in anti-Xa levels of 1.2 to 1.6 IU/mL, anti-IIa levels of 1.8 to 2.4 IU/mL, an increase in APTT greater than 10-fold over baseline, and a 2.5-fold increase (P<0.05) in template bleeding time. Compared with the vehicle group, circulating platelet count and hematocrit were not changed significantly by any dose of enoxaparin or UH tested. Enoxaparin, unlike UH, prevented repetitive platelet-dependent thrombus formation in the dog, thereby supporting the potential use of enoxaparin as a replacement for heparin in the treatment of arterial thrombotic disorders such as unstable angina.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR) in a new scheme of anticoagulant monitoring

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR), a test employing anion exchange chromatography, was devised as an alternative to the prothrombin time after heparin removal (PT/HR) to monitor simultaneous anticoagulation with heparin and coumarins. The potential utility of the aPTT/HR was assessed by performing parallel PTs and aPTTs on 62 consecutive plasmas from coumarin-treated outpatients. All samples had 0.2 units/ml of heparin added and then removed to see if the maneuver influenced therapeutic group assignment. In no instance did reassignment occur. A conditional Irwin-Fisher test (P = 0.000604) and a special multinomial trial analysis (P = 0.002) indicated that the aPTT would be at least comparable to the PT for following coumarin antithrombotic prophylaxis. Since the heparin removal procedure had no influence on therapeutic categorization, the same statistical proof could be applied to the relationship between aPTT/HR and PT/HR. This study indicates that the aPTT can be used to monitor all stages of heparin and /or coumarin anticoagulation.     

Laboratory assessment of antithrombotic therapy: what tests and if so why?

A critical review is given of the tests available for the assessment of the action of anticoagulants, such as heparins, oral anticoagulants and direct thrombin inhibitors, in patients under antithrombotic therapy. The principle of action and the performance of the thromboplastin time (PT), the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the whole blood clotting time, the thrombin time, the ecarin clotting time and the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) is discussed, as well as the evidence behind the accepted therapeutic ranges. The two most common tests, PT and aPTT, respond in an essentially different way to clinically effective anticoagulation with heparin and with oral anticoagulants. This means that they covariate with, but do not themselves represent the essential parameter influenced by anticoagulation. The experimental basis for the widely accepted two times prolongation of the aPTT as an indicator for adequate anticoagulation is shown to be meagre in the case of unfractionated heparin and lacking for the other anticoagulants. Common sources for error in the interpretation of anti-factor Xa- and anti-thrombin activity of heparins are indicated. Extensive experience with new tests like the ecarin clotting time and the ETP is still lacking. On the basis of preliminary data and in view of the importance of the enzymatic action of thrombin in the pathogenesis of thrombosis, the ETP is considered a possible candidate for a common parameter to assess different types of anticoagulants.