Conceptual Design Study of 180 MWt Small-Sized Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor Core

Conceptual design of a Small-sized Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor (S-RMWR) core, which has the thermal output of 180 MW, the conversion ratio of 1.0 and the void reactivity coefficient of negative value, has been constructed. S-RMWR is a technology demonstration reactor which also conducts material and fuel testing for commercial use of Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor (RMWR) in large-scale power plants. It has a very tight triangular fuel rod lattice and a high coolant void fraction. The RMWR core axially has two short and flat uranium plutonium mixed oxide (MOX) regions with an internal blanket region in between, in order to avoid a positive void reactivity coefficient. The MOX regions are sandwiched between upper and lower blanket regions, in order to increase a conversion ratio.

In this small reactor core, leakage of neutrons is expected to be larger than in a large core. Therefore, a core design concept different from that for a large core is necessary. Core burnup calculations and nuclear and thermal-hydraulic coupled calculations were performed in the present study with SRAC and MOSRA codes. MVP code was also used to obtain control rod worth. Because of its large neutron leakage, keeping the void reactivity coefficient negative is easier for S-RMWR than RMWR. Thus, the heights of MOX region can be taller and the plutonium enrichment can be lower than in RMWR. On the other hand, to achieve the conversion ratio of 1.0, radial blanket and stainless steel reflector assemblies are necessary, whereas they are not needed for RMWR.     

Study on high conversion type core of innovative water reactor for flexible fuel cycle (FLWR) for minor actinide (MA) recycling

In order to ensure sustainable energy supplies in the future based on the well-established light water reactor (LWR) technologies, conceptual design studies have been performed on the innovative water reactor for flexible fuel cycle (FLWR) with the high conversion ratio core. For early introduction of FLWR without a serious technical gap from the LWR technologies, the conceptual design of the high conversion type one (HC-FLWR) was constructed to recycle reprocessed plutonium. Furthermore, an investigation of minor actinide (MA) recycling based on the HC-FLWR core concept has been performed and is presented in this paper. Because HC-FLWR is a near-term technology, it would be a good option in the future if HC-FLWR can recycle MAs. In order to recycle MAs in HC-FLWR, it has been found that the core design should be changed, because the loaded MA makes the void reactivity coefficient worse and decreases the discharge burn-up. To find a promising core design specification, the investigation on the core characteristics were performed using the results from parameter surveys with core burn-up calculations. The final core designs were established by coupled three dimensional neutronics and thermal–hydraulics core calculations. The major core specifications are as follows. The plutonium fissile (Puf) content is 13 wt%. The discharge burn-up is about 55 GWd/t. Around 2 wt% of Np or Am can be recycled. The MA conversion ratios are around unity. In particular, it has been found that loaded Np can be transmuted effectively in this core concept. Therefore, these concepts would be a good option to reduce environmental burdens.     

Core concept of compound process fuel cycle

This paper presents fast reactor core concept and its feasibility as a part of newly proposed compound process fuel cycle in which spent fuels of light water reactor are multi-recycled without conventional reprocessing but with only pyrochemical processing, fuel re-fabrication and reloading to the fast reactor core. Results of the core survey analyses in order to find out the feasibility of this concept, taking example for BWR MOX spent fuel of 60 GWd/t burn-up, show that four times recycling of LWR spent fuel with the burn-up of more than 300 GWd/t can be achieved without increasing MA content. Such benefits will be expected in this concept as reduction of fuel cycle cost due to simplified reprocessing procedure, reduction of environmental impacts due to reduced high level waste, efficient utilization of nuclear fuel resources, enhancement of nuclear non-proliferation, and suppression of LWR spent fuel pile-up.     

Investigation on spent fuel characteristics of reduced-moderation water reactor (RMWR)

The spent fuel characteristics of the reduced-moderation water reactor (RMWR) have been investigated using the SWAT and ORIGEN codes. RMWR is an advanced LWR concept for plutonium recycling by using the MOX fuel. In the code calculation, the ORIGEN libraries such as one-group cross-section data prepared for RMWR were necessary. Since there were no open libraries for RMWR, they were produced in this study by using the SWAT code. New libraries based on the heterogeneous core modeling in the axial direction and with the variable actinide cross-section (VXSEC) option were produced and selected as the representative ORIGEN libraries for RMWR. In order to investigate the characteristics of the RMWR spent fuel, the decay heat, the radioactivity and the content of each nuclide were evaluated with ORIGEN using these libraries. In this study, the spent fuel characteristics of other types of reactors, such as PWR, BWR, high burn-up PWR, full-MOX-PWR, full-MOX-BWR and FBR, were also evaluated with ORIGEN.

It has been found that about a half of the decay heat of the RMWR spent fuel comes from the actinides nuclides. It is the same with the radioactivity. The decay heat and the radioactivity of the RMWR spent fuel are lower than those of full-MOX-LWRs and FBR, and are the same level as those of the high burn-up PWR. The decay heat and the radioactivity from the fission products (FPs) in the spent fuel mainly depend on the burn-up and the burn-up time rather than the reactor type. Therefore, the decay heat and the radioactivity from FPs in the RMWR spent fuel are smaller, reflecting its relatively long burn-up time resulted from its core characteristics with the high conversion ratio. The radioactivity from the actinides in the spent fuel mainly depends on the ²⁴¹Pu content in the initial fuel, and the decay heat mainly depends on ²³⁸Pu and ²⁴⁴Cm. The contribution of ²⁴⁴Cm is much smaller in RMWR than in MOX-LWRs because of the difference in the spectrum. In addition, from the waste disposal point of view, the characteristics of the heat generation FP elements, the platinum group metals, Mo and the long-lived FPs (LLFPs) were also investigated.     

Analysis of MOX fuel behavior in reduced-moderation water reactor by fuel performance code FEMAXI-RM

To assess the feasibility of the 31% Pu-MOX fuel rod design of reduced-moderation water reactor (RMWR) in terms of thermal and mechanical behaviors, a single rod assumed to be irradiated in the core of RMWR up to 106 GWd/tHM has been analyzed by a fuel performance code FEMAXI-RM which is an extended version of FEMAXI-6 code. In the analysis, design specifications of fuel rod and irradiation conditions have been input, and available models of both MOX fuel and UO₂ fuel have been used as appropriate. The results are: fission gas release is several tens of percent, rod internal pressure does not exceed the coolant pressure, and the highest fuel center temperature is 2400 K, while cladding diameter increase caused by pellet swelling is within 1% strain. These predictions suggest that the MOX fuel rod integrity will be held during irradiation in RMWR, though actual behavior of MOX pellet swelling and cladding oxidation require to be investigated in detail.     

Plutonium recycling in hydride fueled PWR cores

The classic approach to the recycling of Pu in PWR is to use mixed U-oxide Pu-oxide (MOX) fuel. The mono-recycling of plutonium in PWR transmutes less than 30% of the loaded plutonium, providing only a limited reduction in the long-term radiotoxicity and in the inventory of TRU to be stored in the repository. The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of plutonium recycling in PWR in the form of plutonium hydride, PuH₂, mixed with uranium and zirconium hydride, ZrH_1.6, referred to as PUZH, that is loaded uniformly in each fuel rod. The assessment is performed by comparing the performance of the PUZH fueled core to that of the MOX fueled core. Performance characteristics examined are transmutation effectiveness, proliferation resistance of the discharged fuel and fuel cycle economics. The PUZH loaded core is found superior to the MOX fueled core in terms of the transmutation effectiveness and proliferation resistance. For the reference cycle duration and reference fuel rod diameter and pitch, the percentage of the plutonium loaded that is transmuted in one recycle is 53% for PUZH versus 29% for MOX fuel. That is, the net amount of plutonium transmuted in the first recycle is 55% higher in cores using PUZH than in cores using MOX fuel. Relative to the discharged MOX, the discharged PUZH fuel has smaller fissile plutonium fraction - 45% versus 60%, 15% smaller minor actinides (MA) inventory and more than double spontaneous fission neutron source intensity and decay heat per gram of discharged TRU. Relative to the MOX fuel assembly, the radioactivity of the PUZH fuel assembly is 26% smaller and the decay heat and the neutron yield are only 3% larger. The net effect is that the handling of the discharged PUZH fuel assembly will be comparable in difficulty to that of the discharged MOX assembly while the proliferation resistance of the TRU of the discharged PUZH fuel is enhanced.     

球床式高温气冷堆MOX燃料循环优化

与压水堆相比,球床式高温气冷堆能在堆芯结构不做明显改变的情况下采用全堆芯装载混合氧化物（MOX）燃料元件。基于250 MW球床模块式高温气冷堆堆芯结构,设计了4种球床式高温气冷堆下MOX燃料循环方式,包括铀钚混合的燃料球和独立的钚球与铀球混合装载的等效方式,采用高温气冷堆设计程序VSOP进行分析,比较了初装堆的有效增殖因数、燃料元件在堆芯内滞留时间、卸料燃耗、温度系数等主要物理特性。结果表明：采用纯铀和纯钚两种分离燃料球且铀燃料球循环时间更长的方案,平均卸料燃耗较高,总体性能较其他循环方式优越。     

Design of an overmoderated fuel and a full MOX core for plutonium consumption in boiling water reactors

The use of uranium–plutonium mixed oxide fuel (MOX) in light water reactors (LWR) is nowadays a current practice in several countries. Generally 1/3 of the reactor core is loaded with MOX fuel assemblies and the other 2/3 with uranium assemblies. Nevertheless the plutonium utilization could be more effective if the full core could be loaded with MOX fuel. In this paper the design of a boiling water reactor (BWR) core fully loaded with an overmoderated MOX fuel design is investigated. The design of overmoderated BWR MOX fuel assemblies based on a 10×10 lattice are developed, these designs improve the neutron spectrum and the plutonium consumption rate, compared with standard MOX assemblies. In order to increase the moderator to fuel ratio two approaches are followed: in the first approach, 8 or 12 fuel rods are replaced by water rods in the 10×10 lattice; in the second approach, an 11×11 lattice with 24 water rods is designed with an active fuel length very close to the standard MOX assembly. The results of the depletion behavior and the main steady state core parameters are presented. The feasibility of a full core loaded with the 11×11 overmoderated MOX fuel assembly is verified. This design take advantage of the softer spectrum comparable to the 10×10 lattice with 12 water rods but with thermal limits comparable to the standard MOX fuel assembly.     

Core characteristics of fast reactor cycle with simple dry pyrochemical processing

Fast reactor core concept and core nuclear characteristics are studied for the application of the simple dry pyrochemical processing for fast reactor mixed oxide spent fuels, that is, the Compound Process Fuel Cycle, large FR core with half of loaded fuels are recycled by the simple dry pyrochemical processing. Results of the core nuclear analyses show that it is possible to recycle FR spent fuel once and to have 1.01 of breeding ratio without radial blanket region. The comparison is made among three kinds of recycle fuels, LWR UO₂ spent fuel, LWR MOX spent fuel, and FR spent fuel. The recycle fuels reach an equilibrium state after recycles regardless of their starting heavy metal compositions, and the recycled FR fuel has the lowest radio-activity and the same level of heat generation among the recycle fuels. Therefore, the compound process fuel cycle has flexibility to recycle both LWR spent fuel and FR spent fuel. The concept has a possibility of enhancement of nuclear non-proliferation and process simplification of fuel cycle.     

Reactivity Coefficients in BN-600 Core with Minor Actinides

In 1999, the IAEA has initiated a Coordinated Research Project on “Updated Codes and Methods to Reduce the Calculational Uncertainties of the LMFR Reactivity Effects.” Three benchmark models representing different modifications of the BN-600 fast reactor have been sequentially established and analyzed, including a hybrid core with highly enriched uranium oxide and MOX fuel, a full MOX core with weapons-grade plutonium, and a MOX core with plutonium and minor actinides coming from spent nuclear fuel. The paper describes studies for the latter MOX core model. The benchmark results include core criticality at the beginning and end of the equilibrium fuel cycle, kinetics parameters, spatial distributions of power, and reactivity coefficients obtained by employing different computation tools and nuclear data. Sensitivity studies were performed to better understand in particular the influence of variations in different nuclear data libraries on the computed results. Transient simulations were done to investigate the consequences of employing a few different sets of power and reactivity coefficient distributions on the system behavior. The obtained results are analyzed in the paper.     

Plutonium breeding of light water cooled fast reactors

Light water cooled fast reactor with new fuel assemblies (FA) has been studied for high breeding of fissile plutonium. It achieves fissile plutonium surviving ratio (FPSR) of 1.342 (discharge/loading), 1.013 end and beginning of equilibrium cycle (EOEC/BOEC), and compound system doubling time (CSDT) of 95.9 years at the average coolant density of pressurized water reactor (PWR). It is further improved for reduced moderation boiling water reactor (BWR) (RMWR) coolant density. Fissile plutonium surviving ratio reaches 1.397 (discharge/loading), 1.030 (EOEC/BOEC) and CSDT is 37 years. The present study has shown the possibility of breeding at the PWR coolant density and meeting the growth rate of energy demand of advanced countries at the RMWR and Super FR coolant density for the first time. The new FA consist of closely packed fuel rods. The integrity of welding of fuel rods at the top and bottom ends is maintained as the conventional fuel rods. The coolant to fuel volume fraction is reduced to 0.085, one-sixth of that of RMWR. The volume fraction remains unchanged with the diameter of the fuel rod. The thermal hydraulic design of the cores remains for the future study.     

Fuel cycle analysis of GFR using advanced fuels

The potential benefits of a synergistic light-water reactor (LWR) and gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR) fuel cycle were evaluated for its impact on the front-end and back-end of the fuel cycle. Comparisons were made with conventional once-through cycle (OTC) and MOX fuel cycle. Variations in the synergistic LWR/GFR fuel cycles were based on the degree of recycle in the LWR including both plutonium and reprocessed uranium with concomitant impact on used LWR fuel inventory. This provided a wide range in composition of GFR feed from low to high plutonium content with impact on transmutation/incineration within the GFR fuel cycle. Self-recycle of all actinides was modeled for the GFR with analyses demonstrating that the GFR can be sustained on and consequently accept a wide range of feed materials. Analyses were done using Monteburns along with MCNP and Origen2.2 to model a 60-year period corresponding to the anticipated lifetime of supposed contemporary LWRs and GFRs. All cycles were evaluated based on actinide total mass and isotopic inventory, radiotoxicity, heatload, and resource requirements including natural uranium and SWU. For comparison, all fuel cycles were normalized based on 1 TWHe output. Improvements in fuel cycle performance are dictated by the production and incineration of minor actinides in the GFR and their continued recycle may not be feasible due to the buildup of troublesome isotopes such as ²⁴⁴Cm and ²⁵²Cf. But where uranium and plutonium continue to be recycled beyond the 60-year period, the LWR/GFR cycles demonstrated order of magnitude reductions in used fuel inventories, heatload, and radiotoxicity on a per TWHe basis over LWR only cycles. The full details of the advanced fuel cycle methodology and results are presented.     

Simple Formulae for Analyzing Matched Abundance Ratio Cascade with Constant Separation Factors for Multi-Component Isotope Separation

After the ratification of START-I the question of how to dispose safely and effectively of excess weapons plutonium, of which there is estimated to be about 501 in the USA and 501 in Russia, has become an important international issue. One of the most likely options is the proposal to use the excess weapons plutonium as MOX fuel in commercial LWRs. This paper evaluates fuel material flow and fuel cycle costs when weapons-grade plutonium is mixed with reactor-grade plutonium to fabricate the MOX fuel and to be recycled in Japanese commercial LWRs.

The results show the MOX fuel using weapons- and reactor-grade mixed plutonium facilitates multiple recycling, because the weapons-grade plutonium improves the isotopic composition of the MOX fuel working like a “purifier” of the degraded recycled plutonium. And they also indicate that it might be an economically realistic method in Japan to use the excess weapons plutonium in the commercial LWRs as MOX fuel if the fabrication cost and the reprocessing cost of MOX fuel are moderate compared to those of UO₂ fuel, assuming the MOX powder using weapons-grade plutonium would be provided free of charge.     

Some aspects of risk reduction strategy by multiple recycling in fast burner reactors of the plutonium and minor actinide inventories

This paper shows the impact of recycling light water reactor (LWR) mixed oxide (MOX) fuel in a fast burner reactor on the plutonium (Pu) and minor actinide (MA) inventories and on the related radioactivities. Reprocessing of the targets for multiple recycling will become increasingly difficult as the burnup increases. Multiple recycling of Pu + MA in fast reactors is a feasible option which has to be studied very carefully: the Pu (except the isotopes Pu-238 and Pu-240), Am and Np levels decrease as a function of the recycle number, while the Cm-244 level accumulates and gradually transforms into Cm-245. Long cooling times (10 + 2 years) are necessary with aqueous processing. The paper discusses the problems associated with multiple reprocessing of highly active fuel types and particularly the impact of Pu-238, Am-241 and Cm-244 on the fuel cycle operations. The calculations were performed with the zero-dimensional ORIGEN-2 code. The validity of the results depends on that of the code and its cross-section library. The time span to reduce the initial inventory of Pu + MA by a factor of 10 amounts to 255 years when average burnups are limited to 150 GW · d t⁻¹ (tonne).     

Fuel cycle strategies and plutonium management in Europe

An overview of current nuclear power generation and fuel cycle strategies in Europe is presented, with an emphasis on options for the management of separated plutonium in the medium to long term. Countries which have opted for reprocessing of spent fuel have had to contend with increasing inventories of separated plutonium. Of the various potential options for utilisation or disposition of these stockpiles, only light water reactor (LWR) mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel programmes are sufficiently technologically mature to be fully operational in several European countries at present. Such reprocessing-recycling programmes allow for a stabilisation of the overall separated plutonium stocks, but not for a significant reduction in the stockpile. Moreover, the quality of recycled plutonium decreases at each potential step of re-irradiation. Therefore, optimised or new ways of managing the plutonium stocks in the medium to long term are required. In the present overview we consider the most promising options for reactor utilisation of plutonium in both near-term future reactor and Generation IV systems.     

Application of fluoride volatility method to the spent fuel reprocessing

ABSTRACT

An advanced reprocessing system has been developed to treat various SF (spent fuels): spent UO₂ and MOX (mixed oxide) fuels from LWR (light water reactor) and MOX fuel from FR (fast reactor). The system consists of SF fluorination to separate most U (uranium) as volatile UF₆, dissolution of solid residue containing Pu (plutonium), FP (fission products), MA (minor actinides) and partial U by nitric acid, and Pu+U separation from FP and MA by conventional solvent extraction. Gaseous UF₆ is purified by the thermal decomposition and the adsorption of volatile PuF₆ and adsorption of other impurities. This system is a hybrid process of fluoride volatility and solvent extraction and called FLUOREX. Fluorination of most U in the early stage of the reprocessing process is aimed at sharply reducing the amount of SF to be treated in the downstream aqueous steps and directly providing purified UF₆ for the enrichment process without conversion. The FLUOREX can flexibly adjust the Pu/U ratio, rapidly separate UF₆ and economically treat aqueous Pu+U. These features are especially suitable for the transition period fuel cycle from LWR to FR. This paper summarizes the feasibility confirmation results of FLUOREX.     

Plutonium rock-like fuel burning in LWR

Plutonium rock-like oxide(ROX) fuel burning in LWR has been studied. To improve reactivity insertion accident(RIA) behavior of zirconia(ZrO₂) type ROX(Zr-ROX) fuel PWR, small negative Doppler reactivity coefficient of the fuel is increased with the additives such as 24mol% ThO₂ or 15mol% UO₂ in the fuel. There is also an approach of a heterogeneous core with 1/3 ROX and 2/3 UO₂ fuels. From the loss of coolant accident(LOCA) analysis of Zr-ROX fuel PWR, the importance to decrease the large power peaking is shown. The ThO₂ additive can make it easier to flatten the power distribution in the core, and improve not only the reactivity accident behavior but also the LOCA behavior. The power flattening can also be achieved by reducing the content of Gd₂O₃ mixed in ZrO₂ and adding Er₂O₃ in place.

In the case of weapons-grade plutonium burning, the plutonium transmutation rate in Zr-ROX fuel LWR is about 0.9tonne/GWe/300 days, and far larger than that of full MOX LWR. The additives of ThO₂ or UO₂ decrease the plutonium transmutation rate, yet it is still larger than that in full MOX LWR by more than 2 times. Even in 1/3 Zr-ROX fuel core, the transmutation rate is comparable with the full MOX case. Total amount of discharged plutonium becomes less than 1/4 to 1/6 in these cores.     

Pressure Drop Experiments using Tight-Lattice 37-Rod Bundles

In order to design a Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor (RMWR) core from a thermal-hydraulic point of view, an evaluation method on the pressure drop in a tight-lattice rod bundle is required. In this study, axial pressure drops in tight-lattice 37-rod bundles were measured under conditions of 2-9 MPa in exit pressure and 200-1,000 kg/(m²·s) in mass velocity. The measured pressure drops were compared with calculated ones by the evaluation method with the Martinelli-Nelson's correlation. The comparison shows that a single-phase friction factor can be applied not only to a circular tube but also to a tight-lattice bundle except for an extremely small gap width. Then two-phase friction loss is a dominant component and accounts for about 60% of the pressure drop under an RMWR nominal operating condition. The evaluation method can evaluate effects of the flow area configuration (rod number, rod diameter, gap width) and axial power distribution under a wide range of flow conditions, and it can yield a good prediction of the pressure drop in a tight-lattice bundle.     

Advanced mixed oxide fuel assemblies with higher plutonium contents for pressurized water reactors

Optimizing fuel cycle costs by increasing the final burnup leads to reduced generation of plutonium. Under properly defined boundary conditions thermal recycling in mixed oxide (MOX) fuel assemblies (FAs) reduces further the amount of plutonium which has to be disposed of in final storage. Increasing the final burnup requires higher initial enrichments of uranium fuel to be matched by an advanced design of MOX FAs with higher plutonium contents. The neutronic design of these MOX FAs has to consider the licensing status of nuclear power plants concerning the use of MOX fuel. The Siemens Nuclear Fuel Cycle Division, with more than 20 years' experience in the production of MOX fuel, has designed several advanced MOX FAs of different types (14 × 14 to 16 × 16) with fissile plutonium contents up to 4.60 w/o.     

Effective Utilization of Weapon-Grade Plutonium to Upgrade Repeatedly-Reprocessed Mixed-Oxide Fuel for Use in Pressurized Water Reactors

A “Multiple Recycling” mode of fuel management is proposed for effectively utilizing weapon-grade plutonium from discarded military material to compensate plutonium degradation in repeatedly-reprocessed mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel. Comparative calculations on core performance are undertaken for comparison between the proposed fuel management mode of Multiple Recycling—using recovered depleted plutonium upgraded by admixture with weapon-grade plutonium while retaining unincreased the total plutonium” content—and a reference mode of using repeatedly reprocessed spent MOX fuel with plutonium upgraded through increase of the plutonium content. Multiple Recycling proves all calculated safety parameters to be retained unimpaired through multiple cycles of MOX fuel reprocessing, whereas in the reference mode of refueling with spent MOX fuel reprocessed without upgrading with weapon-grade plutonium, many of the calculated safety parameters come to exceed stipulated limits with repetition of fuel cycles. Moreover, Multiple Recycling mode can be implemented with application solely of techniques already practiced in the fabrication of MOX fuel.