Phenotypic detection of mec A-positive staphylococcal blood stream isolates: high accuracy of simple disk diffusion tests

Detection of oxacillin-resistance in staphylococci by phenotypic methods remains problematic. Although standardized susceptibility test methods are adequate for Staphylococcus aureus, many are less satisfactory for the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). We have studied 108 consecutive blood culture isolates of staphylococci. The mec A gene was detected by PCR in one S. aureus and 55 CNS isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed as follows: oxacillin (1-microgram), ceftizoxime (30-microgram), and cephalothin (30-microgram) by disk diffusion; oxacillin, ceftizoxime, cephalothin, methicillin, ampicillin, ampicillin/ sulbactam, penicillin, cefazolin, imipenem, and meropenem by the broth microdilution method. In addition, isolates were tested by the oxacillin agar screen plate method. The single oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strain was detected by all oxacillin susceptibility test methods and by the ceftizoxime disk and MIC methods. Two oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus were intermediate (minor error) by ceftizoxime broth microdilution (MIC, 16 micrograms/mL). The most sensitive, simple phenotypic methods for detection of oxacillin-resistant CNS (mec A positive) were as follows: oxacillin disk diffusion at 98%, oxacillin screen plate at 91%, oxacillin broth microdilution at 87%, ceftizoxime disk diffusion at 100%, ceftizoxime broth microdilution at 87%, and methicillin broth microdilution at 83%. These results indicate that oxacillin and ceftizoxime disk diffusion tests are the most accurate phenotypic methods in routine clinical use for detection of oxacillin-resistant CNS. Oxacillin broth microdilution MIC testing (2% NaCl supplement) would perform more satisfactorily (100% sensitivity) with an adjusted interpretive breakpoint at < or = 0.5 microgram/mL, in contrast to the lower accuracy of the "so-called" reference agar screen test.     

Susceptibility testing interpretive criteria for levofloxacin when testing respiratory pathogens, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis

The more active L-isomer, levofloxacin, of the racemic ofloxacin mixture has been under development for therapeutic use. In this study, we evaluated the activity of ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and D-ofloxacin against the fastidious respiratory tract pathogens Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Levofloxacin was two-fold more active than ofloxacin against H. influenzae (MIC90, 0.015 microgram/ml), and D-ofloxacin was least active (MIC90, 1 microgram/ml). For M. catarrhalis the MIC90 values were 0.03 microgram/ml, 0.06 microgram/ml, and 2 micrograms/ml for levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and D-ofloxacin, respectively. For disk diffusion susceptibility testing, Chocolate Mueller-Hinton agar (CMH) was considered preferable to Haemophilus test medium (HTM) because it supported the growth of all of 105 H. influenzae strains whereas five strains failed to grow on HTM. In addition, the margins of the zones of inhibition were more distinct on CMH and the Haemophilus species strains with elevated fluoroquinolone MICs were readily distinguished. The superior growth on CMH was reflected in a reduction of inhibition zone diameters of 2-3 mm relative to the inhibition zone diameters on HTM. The previously proposed interpretive criteria for the 5 microgram disk diffusion susceptibility test (susceptible at > or = 17 mm) results in complete categorical agreement with the reference microdilution broth method for M. catarrhalis on Mueller Hinton agar and for H. influenzae on HTM and CMH. However, the minimum diameter of the zone of inhibition recorded for a member of the dominant population of either species was considerably greater (25 mm) than 17 mm on any of the media tested.     

Comparison of Etest to broth microdilution method for testing Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility to levofloxacin and three macrolides

When the Etest was compared to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae, levofloxacin, erythromycin, and penicillin results correlated for both methods; azithromycin and clarithromycin showed discrepancies of > or = 2 dilutions for 95.8% and 31.5% of the isolates, respectively. Levofloxacin was active against 141 of 142 isolates (< or = 2.0 micrograms/ml), making it a potentially useful new fluoroquinolone.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 59 strains of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus

The susceptibilities of 59 Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus isolates to eight antibiotics were studied by the agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods. None of the isolates were beta-lactamase producers. All were susceptible to ampicillin, gentamicin, imipenem, and meropenem as determined by the three methods, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC90s) (determined by agar dilution) of 2, 1, < or = 0.06, and 0.12 microgram/ml, respectively. Twenty-seven percent of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline, with complete agreement between the agar dilution and disk diffusion results. The MIC90s determined by agar dilution were 2 micrograms/ml for erythromycin, 1 microgram/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 8 micrograms/ml for cefotaxime.     

Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

An evaluation to determine the optimal methods for the in vitro susceptibility testing of 41 clinical isolates and the ATCC 49619 strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin was undertaken. No very major or major interpretive errors were observed with the following test methods and media: agar dilution using either Mueller-Hinton medium with lysed horse blood or Haemophilus test medium; broth dilution using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton medium with lysed horse blood, Haemophilus test medium, or Todd-Hewitt medium; and the epsilo-meter test (E-test) using agar containing Mueller-Hinton medium and 5% sheep blood. The disk diffusion method using agar containing Mueller-Hinton medium and 5% sheep blood agar was an effective screening method, requiring confirmation by a dilution susceptibility test method.     

Comparison of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to broth microdilution for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within +/-1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.     

Evaluation of the E test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with long-term bladder catheterization

The E test was evaluated in comparison with reference agar methods (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) for the susceptibility testing of 248 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from bladder-catheterized patients against nine antibiotics. The E-test MICs correlated well with those determined by the agar dilution and disk diffusion reference methods (88 and 92.5% within 1 log2 dilution step, respectively), confirming that the E test is a reliable method for the determination of MICs of antibiotics for catheterization-associated P. aeruginosa isolates.     

Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution and E-test susceptibility tests of Cryptococcus neoformans for fluconazole

Forty Cryptococcus neoformans strains isolated from cerebral spinal fluid specimens collected from 39 patients were included in the study. The MICs for fluconacole were determined by YNB macrodilution test, microdilution tests using both RPMI1640 and YNB medium and E-tests on solidified RPMI1640 medium, Casitone and YNB agar. In comparison with the reference macrodilution method NCCLS M27-P both the microdilution as well as the E-test techniques can be used for fluconacole susceptibility testing of Cr. neoformans.     

Quality control limits for dilution and disk diffusion susceptibility tests of trovafloxacin against eight quality control strains

A 10-laboratory collaborative effort was designed to generate data to propose quality control limits for susceptibility tests of trovafloxacin. Broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion tests were evaluated with eight different control strains. All tests were reproducible, and control limits are proposed.     

Prevalence of resistance to three fluoroquinolones: assessment of levofloxacin disk test error rates and surrogate predictors of levofloxacin susceptibility. AST Surveillance Group

More than 3,000 consecutive clinical bacterial isolates from 10 U.S. medical centers were subjected to standard broth microdilution and disk diffusion tests to determine their susceptibilities to levofloxacin, ofloxacin, D-ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Levofloxacin was confirmed to be twice as active as ofloxacin and to have activity comparable to that of ciprofloxacin, with minor variations in activity against some species. The prevalence of resistant isolates was 7.1% to levofloxacin, 9.3% to ciprofloxacin, and 11.2% to ofloxacin. The susceptibilities of some species to the quinolones were less than those reported in previous studies. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates had the greatest variability in their susceptibilities to the three drugs between the participating centers. Two proposed zone size breakpoints for levofloxacin disk tests yielded similar low error rates. Ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin susceptibility test results correlated reasonably well with those of levofloxacin and could be used as surrogate indicators of levofloxacin susceptibility, but that resulted in some serious errors, and thus, direct testing of levofloxacin susceptibility is preferable. Replicate testing of standard quality control strains confirmed the established and proposed quality control parameters for all three quinolones tested.     

Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin

An evaluation was undertaken to determine the optimal method for testing the susceptibilities of 100 clinical isolates and two reference strains of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin in vitro. Six testing methods were studied by using the following media and incubation times: agar screen with the Synergy Quad Plate (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.), an in-house-prepared brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plate, and an in-house-prepared Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plate, all incubated for 24 or 48 h; broth microdilution (Sensititre Just One Strip; AccuMed International, Inc., West Lake, Ohio) with BHI or cation-adjusted MH broth incubated for 24 or 48 h; agar dilution with BHI or MH agar incubated for 24 or 48 h; epsilometer test (E test; AB BioDisk, Solna, Sweden) with BHI or MH agar incubated for 24 or 48 h; disk diffusion with BHI or MH agar incubated for 24 or 48 h; and the automated Vitek method with the gram-positive susceptibility Staphylococcus aureus card and R02.03 software (bioMerieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). Growth failures occurred with MH media (n = 6) but not with BHI media. One growth failure occurred with the Vitek method. Results for each testing method for each Enterococcus strain were interpreted as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) criteria and compared to the vancomycin resistance genotype (i.e., vanA, vanB, vanC-1, or vanC-2/3). For all methods, extension of the incubation time from 24 h to 48 h either produced no difference in the results or gave poorer results. The following methods produced no very major or major interpretive errors: broth microdilution with BHI media incubated for 24 h, agar dilution with BHI media incubated for 24 or 48 h, and E test with BHI media incubated for 24 or 48 h. Unacceptable frequencies of very major errors (> 1%) occurred with all methods for which MH media were used. Minor interpretive errors were frequent with all methods. These minor interpretive errors also occurred most frequently with Enterococcus strains with vanC genes, which encoded low-level vancomycin resistance (MIC < or = 8 microg/ml), as opposed to Enterococcus strains which possessed vanA or vanB genes, which encoded higher-level vancomycin resistance (MIC > or = 64 microg/ml). Modification of NCCLS breakpoints, especially for motile Enterococcus spp. (E. casseliflavus, E. flavescens, and E. gallinarum), may resolve this problem; however, in the current study, one E. faecalis strain and one E. faecium strain carried only the vanC gene. The agar screen method may also require reformulation. The current agar screen plate contains 6 microg of vancomycin per ml, which may not detect all low-level resistance associated with vanC genotypes. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of this low-level vancomycin resistance remains unknown.     

In vitro activity of omeprazole in combination with several antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori

An agar dilution checkerboard method was used to evaluate the in vitro activity of omeprazole combined with clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ceftibuten, respectively, against clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Mueller-Hinton agar plus 5% horse blood, an inoculum of 10(6) cfu/ml, and incubation of 72 h in a CO2 atmosphere were used. With the omeprazole and clarithromycin combination, synergism was observed in 51.5% and partial synergism in 39.3% of 33 strains; with omeprazole and amoxicillin, synergism was observed in 3% and partial synergism in 60.6% of 33 strains; and with omeprazole and ceftibuten, synergism was observed in 33.3% and partial synergism in 50% of 24 strains. Antagonism between omeprazole and each antibiotic was exhibited in 0%, 6.1%, and 4.1% of these groups of strains, respectively. Of the antibiotic combinations tested, omeprazole plus clarithromycin exhibited synergism (partial or total) in the highest percentage of strains.     

Decreased nitrogen rates and irrigation effect on celery yield and internal quality

Sparfloxacin, a new orally administered fluoroquinolone, was tested against 14,182 clinical strains isolated (generally blood stream and respiratory tract cultures) at nearly 200 hospitals in the United States (USA) and Canada. Sparfloxacin activity was compared with 13 other compounds by Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden), broth microdilution, or a standardized disk diffusion method. Using the Food and Drug Administration/product package insert MIC breakpoint for sparfloxacin susceptibility (< or = 0.5 microgram/ml), 94% of Streptococcus pneumoniae (2666 isolates) and 89% of the other streptococci (554 isolates) were susceptible. However, at < or = 1 microgram/ml (the breakpoint for all nonstreptococcal species) sparfloxacin susceptibility rates increased to 100% and 98%, respectively, for the two groups of streptococci. Only 50% and 65% of pneumococci were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC90, 3 micrograms/ml) and penicillin (MIC90, 1.5 micrograms/ml), respectively. Although there were significant differences between regions in the USA in the frequency of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strains, results indicate that the overall sparfloxacin MIC90 was uniformly at 0.5 microgram/ml. Nearly all (> or = 99%) Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis, including those harboring beta-lactamases, were susceptible to sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Only cefprozil and macrolides demonstrated lower potency and spectrum against these two species. Sparfloxacin was active against oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (96 to 97%), Klebsiella spp. (95%), and other tested enteric bacilli (93%). Comparison between broth microdilution MIC and disk diffusion interpretive results for M. catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and the Enterobacteriaceae showed an absolute intermethod categorical agreement of > 95% using current sparfloxacin breakpoints, in contrast to those of cefpodoxime for S. aureus where a conspicuous discord (98% versus 59%) between methods was discovered. These results demonstrate that sparfloxacin possesses sufficient in vitro activity and spectrum versus pathogens that cause respiratory tract infections (indications), especially strains resistant to other drug classes such as the earlier fluoroquinolones, oral cephalosporins, macrolides, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The sparfloxacin susceptibility breakpoint for streptococci may require modification (< or = 1 microgram/ml) based on the MIC population analysis presented here. A modal MIC (0.38 to 0.5 microgram/ml) was observed at the current breakpoint. Regardless, sparfloxacin inhibited 89% (nonpneumococcal Streptococcus spp.) to 100% (Haemophilus spp., M. catarrhalis) of the isolates tested with a median activity of 97% against indicated species.     

Antibiotic susceptibility testing (agar disk diffusion and agar dilution) of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium: comparison of Mueller-Hinton, Iso-Sensitest, and Wilkins-Chalgren agar media

Forty-two isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and 56 isolates of Enterococcus faecium, including 8 vancomycin-resistant strains, were examined for comparative susceptibility to 27 antimicrobial drugs with the agar dilution method, employing Mueller-Hinton (MHA), Iso-Sensitest (ISTA), and Wilkins-Chalgren (WCA) agar. The Bauer-Kirby agar disk diffusion method was used to comparatively test 24 of the agents in parallel. The enterococci yielded better growth on ISTA and WCA. However, WCA completely antagonized co-trimoxazole and, though less, fosfomycin. Importantly, WCA slightly reduced the activities of teicoplanin (minimal inhibitory concentrations, MICs, raised up to twofold) and vancomycin (MICs raised two- to fourfold) against enterococci and staphylococcal quality control strains. Therefore, WCA was judged unsuitable for susceptibility testing of enterococci. For E. faecalis no discrepancies between agar dilution MICs and inhibition zone diameters were encountered with augmentin, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, chloramphenicol, mupirocin, oxacillin, teicoplanin, and co-trimoxazole. Overall, MHA yielded fewer very major (category I) and major (category II) discrepancies than ISTA. However, numerous minor (category III), slight (category IV), minimal (category V), and/or negligible (category VI) discrepancies were encountered with ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, meropenem, ofloxacin and rifampin. With respect to E. faecium, only cefotaxime, mupirocin, oxacillin, and teicoplanin yielded nondiscrepant results. Several very major (I) and major (II) discrepancies were observed with augmentin, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, doxycycline, fusidic acid, imipenem, and penicillin G. Minor discrepancies (categories III-VI) were particularly numerous with augmentin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and piperacillin. The largest numbers of negligible (VI) discrepancies were noted with fosfomycin, fusidic acid, and ofloxacin. It is recommended to test one cephalosporin (cefuroxime or the like) in parallel for educational purposes and to exclude fosfomycin, fusidic acid, and rifampin from test batteries because of the wide scatter of test results. The large number of minimal (V) discrepancies of ciprofloxacin against E. faecalis, the numerous minor (III) and slight (IV) discrepancies of chloramphenicol against E. faecium, and the not insignificant number of very major (I) and minor (III) discrepancies observed with meropenem against isolates of E. faecalis necessitated proposals for new disk intermediate susceptibility criteria.     

Usefulness of the disk diffusion method for evaluating the sensitivity of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin and cefotaxime

BACKGROUND: Routine susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin and other beta lactams is recommended after the isolation of N. meningitidis of moderately resistant to penicillin (MRP). We have evaluated the disk-diffusion method to determine susceptibility of N. meningitidis to penicillin (using disks of either penicillin or oxacillin) and to cefotaxime. METHODS: Fifty-four strains of N. meningitidis isolated from clinical samples were studied. MICs of penicillin and cefotaxime were determined by microdilution. Disks of 2 U of penicillin, 1 microgram of oxacillin and 30 micrograms of cefotaxime and two culture media, Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) and MHA supplemented with 5% sheep blood (MHS) were used in the disk-diffusion assay. RESULTS: For disk of 2 U of penicillin assayed in MHA, 86.4% of the susceptible strains and 20% of MRP strains were considered susceptible when a breakpoint of 28 mm was considered. None of the MRP strains was considered susceptible when using MHS, but only 38.6% of susceptible strains appeared as such on this medium. When a 1 microgram oxacillin disk was used all MRP strains presented an inhibition zone < or = 10 mm on both MHA and MHS, but 54.4 and 4.5% of susceptible strains presented an inhibition zone > or = 11 mm on MHA and MHS, respectively. All strains were susceptible to cefotaxime, showing inhibition zones around a 30 micrograms disk on MHA and MHS of > or = 35 mm and > or = 25 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Disk diffusion with cefotaxime (30 micrograms) allows to determine susceptibility of N. meningitidis to this antimicrobial agent. Discs of penicillin (2 U) and oxacillin (1 microgram) are not useful for screening of MRP N. meningitidis.     

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Corynebacterium species by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods

Corynebacterium species are increasingly being implicated in foreign-body infections and in immunocompromised-host infections. However, there are no specific recommendations on the method or the criteria to use in order to determine the in vitro activities of the antibiotics commonly used to treat Corynebacterium infections. The first aim of our study was to compare the susceptibilities of various species of Corynebacterium to vancomycin, erythromycin, and penicillin by using a broth microdilution method and a disk diffusion method. Second, the activity of penicillin against our isolates was assessed by using the interpretative criteria recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for the determination of the susceptibility of streptococci and Listeria monocytogenes to penicillin. Overall, 100% of the isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, while considerable variations in the activities of erythromycin and penicillin were noted for the different species tested, including the non-Corynebacterium jeikeium species. A good correlation in the susceptibilities of vancomycin and erythromycin between the disk diffusion and the microdilution methods was observed. However, a 5% rate of major or very major errors was detected with the Listeria criteria, while a high rate of minor errors (18%) was noted when the streptococcus criteria were used. Our findings indicate considerable variations in the activities of erythromycin and penicillin against the various species of Corynebacterium. Because of the absence of definite recommendations, important discrepancies were observed between the methods and the interpretations of the penicillin activity.     

Detection of resistance to amphotericin B among Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates: performances of three different media assessed by using E-test and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A methodologies

Although reliable detection of resistance in vitro is critical to the overall performance of any susceptibility testing method, the recently released National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A methodology for susceptibility testing of yeasts discriminates poorly between resistant and susceptible isolates of Candida spp. We have previously shown that both substitution of antibiotic medium 3 for RPMI 1640 medium in the microdilution variant of the M27-A method and use of the E-test agar diffusion methodology permit detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates. To determine the relevance of these observations to Cryptococcus neoformans, we have evaluated the performances of both the M27-A and the E-test methodologies with this yeast using three different media (RPMI 1640 medium, antibiotic medium 3, and yeast nitrogen base). As with Candida, we found that only antibiotic medium 3 permitted consistent detection of resistant isolates when testing was performed in broth by the M27-A method. When testing was performed by the E-test agar diffusion method, both RPMI 1640 medium and antibiotic medium 3 agar permitted ready detection of the resistant isolates. Reading of the results after 48 h of incubation was required for testing in broth by the M27-A method, while the MIC could be determined after either 48 or 72 h when the agar diffusion method was used.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori by triple therapy in ulcerous patients: the role of endoscopy and antibiotic sensitivity

BACKGROUND: A protocol was conducted to evaluate the compliance and results of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment in patients with ulcer disease. To know the metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin activities of Helicobacter pylori strains from such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 35 patients with ulcer disease (27 duodenal ulcer and 8 gastric ulcer) were studied. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection was performed by urease test and culture of mucosal gastric samples from patients undergoing endoscopy. The patients received the following treatment during 7 days: omeprazole (20 mg bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and amoxicillin (1 g bid), OCA x 7. Susceptibility was determined by E-test system on Wilkins-Chalgren blood agar and read after 5 days. RESULTS: 22/24 patients who had completed the protocol design eradicated Helicobacter pylori (91.7%), 11 patients (31.4%) refused second endoscopy to verify control of eradication. After treatment 10 patients presented with pyrosis "de novo" (28%). The overall metronidazol, claritromycin and amoxicillin resistance rate was 50%, 1.5% and 0% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OCA x 7 treatment obtains a eradication rate higher than 90% in our patients with ulcer disease, despite smoking habit, but with a significative number of patients presenting pyrosis after treatment. We recommend a non-endoscopy method to verify eradication rate, because of its poor acceptance. 3. Metronidazol resistance rate is high in our series but clarithromycin susceptibility is maintained.     

Clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori: prevalence in untreated dyspeptic patients and stability in vitro

Susceptibilities to clarithromycin and metronidazole of 444 Helicobacter pylori isolates cultured from antral biopsies of 444 dyspeptic patients were determined by disc diffusion tests (15 mu g disc for clarithromycin, 5 mu g disc for metronidazole). Susceptibility of 46 of these isolates to erythromycin (5 mu g disc) was also tested. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of clarithromycin for 42 selected isolates were determined by a plate dilution method. A zone diameter of 30 mm was defined as a 'cut-off' size differentiating susceptibility and resistance of the organism to clarithromycin, by comparing results obtained with the two methods. Of the 444 isolates, 424 (95.5%) were highly sensitive to clarithromycin, with zone diameters ranging from 30 to 98 mm. Twenty isolates (4.5%) were defined as resistant to clarithromycin, with zone diameters ranging between 6 and 28 mm. The incidence of clarithromycin resistance was similar in men and women and in different age groups, and was not significantly different between patients with peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia. Among the 444 isolates, 168 (37.8%) were metronidazole resistant. There was cross resistance between clarithromycin and erythromycin, but not between clarithromycin and metronidazole. Stability of clarithromycin resistance was evaluated by the disc diffusion test and confirmed by the plate dilution method. Among the 20 clarithromycin-resistant isolates, nine (45%) reverted to be sensitive after 25 subcultures on drug-free agar. The findings in this study indicate that the incidence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori in untreated dyspeptic patients is low. Cross-resistance occurs between macrolides and resistance to clarithromycin in some strains is reversible.     

Evaluation of the standardized disk diffusion and agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility test methods by using strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from Tucumán, Argentina

At present, most Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing is done with beta-lactamase and agar dilution tests using common therapeutic agents. Generally, in bacteriological diagnosis laboratories in Argentina, study of antibiotic susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae is based on beta-lactamase determination and agar dilution method using common therapeutic agents. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recently described a disk diffusion test that produces results similar to the reference agar dilution method for antibiotic susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae. We obtained 57 gonococcal isolates from patients attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases in Tucumán, Argentina. Antibiotic susceptibility tests using agar dilution and disk diffusion techniques were compared. The established NCCLS interpretive criteria for both susceptibility methods appeared to be applicable to domestic gonococcal strains. The correlation between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC's) and the zones of inhibition was studied for penicillin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, spectinomycin, cefotaxime, cephaloridine, cephalexin, tetracycline, norfloxacin and kanamycin. Dispersion diagrams showed a high correlation between both methods, with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 91%.