A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension

We conducted a randomised, double-blind, parallel design study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, alone or with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, nifedipine GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system), in elderly patients (> or =65 years old) with a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg. After a placebo wash out period, 140 patients were randomly assigned to receive either losartan 50 mg or nifedipine GITS 30 mg. Patients were evaluated at 4-week intervals during a 12-week treatment period. Patients receiving losartan had HCTZ 12.5 mg added and increased to 25 mg to reduce DBP <90 mm Hg. Patients receiving nifedipine GITS had their dose increased to 60 mg and 90 mg to reduce DBP <90 mm Hg. Efficacy, tolerability and quality of life were assessed during the 12 weeks on each regimen. Patients treated with the losartan regimen (n = 73) had reductions in trough sitting DBP of -10, -13, and -13 mm Hg after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of therapy, respectively. Patients receiving the nifedipine GITS regimen (n = 67) had DBP reductions of -14, -15, and -15 mm Hg, respectively. There were no significant differences in the DBP response between the treatment groups except at week 4 (P < 0.05). Similar reductions in systolic BP (SBP) between the two treatment groups were observed at all time points. The percentages of patients in the two treatment groups reaching goal DBP (<90 mm Hg or DBP > or =90 mm Hg with a reduction from a baseline of > or =10 mm Hg) were comparable (81% on the losartan regimen and 90% on the nifedipine GITS regimen). There were significantly more adverse events reported in patients receiving nifedipine GITS when compared to the losartan regimen (54% vs 36%, P < 0.05). A patient-reported symptom inventory also showed that swollen ankles was bothersome in significantly more patients treated with the nifedipine GITS regimen when compared to the losartan regimen (24% vs 5%, P = 0.001). Thus, in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension, a regimen of losartan alone or with HCTZ has similar efficacy to a regimen of nifedipine GITS with greater tolerability and less symptom bother due to swollen ankles.     

Long-term evaluation of combined antihypertensive therapy with lisinopril and a thiazide diuretic in patients with essential hypertension

For the treatment of hypertension, the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a thiazide diuretic is supported by multiple lines of evidence, because these drugs have synergistic action and are expected to cancel out each other's adverse side effects. However, the long-term outcome of this combination antihypertensive therapy is not entirely clear. In the present multicenter open trial, we investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of combined antihypertensive therapy with an ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, and a thiazide diuretic, trichlormethiazide. A total of 466 patients with essential hypertension were treated with lisinopril alone (monotherapy group, n = 360) or with a combination of lisinopril with trichlormethiazide (combination therapy group, n = 106) for 1 year. The average blood pressure was effectively lowered to below 150/90 mmHg in both the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups throughout the study period. The average maintenance dose of lisinopril was lower when combined with thiazide than when given alone (9.8 vs. 11.5 mg/day, p < 0.001). Dry cough was the major side effect of lisinopril; no severe adverse effects were observed. The incidence of cough was not significantly different between the monotherapy group (13.1%) and the combination therapy group (11.3%). The increase in serum potassium observed in the monotherapy group was reversed by the concurrent use of the thiazide diuretic in the combination therapy group. Fasting blood glucose was significantly reduced in the monotherapy group; the reduction observed in the combination therapy group was not significant. Thus, the present results provide useful information as to the effectiveness and safety of combined antihypertensive therapy with lisinopril and a thiazide in comparison with monotherapy with lisinopril.     

Effects of silymarin in alcoholic patients with cirrhosis of the liver: results of a controlled, double-blind, randomized and multicenter trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Silymarin has protective effects in different experimental conditions, but its efficacy in human liver cirrhosis has not been completely established. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the effect of silymarin in alcoholics with liver cirrhosis with respect to survival and clinical and laboratory changes. METHODS: From February 1986 to June 1989, we enrolled 200 alcoholics with histologically or laparoscopically proven liver cirrhosis in a randomized, double-blind multicenter trial comparing 450 mg of silymarin (150 mg/ three times per day) with placebo. The primary outcome was time to death, and the secondary outcome was the progression of liver failure. Additional analyses were also performed in 75 patients in whom anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies were measured after completion of the trial. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were assigned to receive silymarin and 97 to receive placebo. The two groups were well matched for demographic and baseline clinical and laboratory features. A 2-year study period was completed in 125 patients (57 receiving silymarin and 68 receiving placebo). Twenty-nine patients (15 receiving silymarin, and 14 receiving placebo) died during the trial. Survival was similar in patients receiving silymarin or placebo. The effect of silymarin on survival was not influenced by sex, the persistence of alcohol intake, the severity of liver dysfunction or by the presence of alcoholic hepatitis in the liver biopsy. Silymarin did not have any significant effect on the course of the disease. No relevant side-effects were observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that silymarin has no effect on survival and the clinical course in alcoholics with liver cirrhosis.     

Comparison between the effects of indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide on creatinine clearance in patients with impaired renal function and hypertension

The long-term effects of indapamide or hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure and renal function were examined in patients with impaired renal function and moderate hypertension. Both drugs controlled hypertension and blood pressure remained normal during the 2 years of the study. Despite this comparable control of hypertension, indapamide therapy was associated with a 28.5 +/- 4.4% increase in creatinine clearance while treatment with hydrochlorothiazide was associated with a 17.4 +/- 3.0% decrease in creatinine clearance. The results of the study indicate that indapamide is superior to hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with impaired renal function and moderate hypertension.     

Double-blind, parallel, comparative multicentre study of a new combination of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide with individual components in patients with mild or moderate hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new combination preparation of diltiazem (150 mg) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) with the individual constituents in patients with mild/moderate hypertension. DESIGN: Multi-centre, double-blind, randomised parallel group study. PATIENTS: Seventy-one patients with essential hypertension were recruited to the study. TREATMENT: Following completion of the placebo run-in period 63 patients fulfilled the prerandomisation criteria and entered the 10 week treatment period. Patients were randomised to receive either the combination preparation (D 150 mg/H 12.5 mg), diltiazem (150 mg) or hydrochlorthiazide (12.5 mg). The dosage was increased in three patients who had not attained target blood pressure (BP) control after 6 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to treatment assessed by change from baseline in clinic and 24 h ambulatory BP. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving target BP (a reduction in resting supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to below 90 mm Hg or a reduction of 10 mm Hg from baseline) was 80% in the combination group, 55% in the diltiazem group, and 38% in the hydrochlorothiazide group. The respective figures for reduction in supine DBP from baseline were 13.5 mm Hg, 11.2 mm Hg and 5.9 mm Hg. A similar treatment order appeared throughout each of the efficacy variables. BP control throughout the 24 h dosing interval was demonstrated by ambulatory BP monitoring. Each treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study provides clear evidence of the efficacy of combination therapy with diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of patients with hypertension.     

Antihypertensive effectiveness of a very low fixed-dose combination of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide

Rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging is currently being used for myocardial viability detection, but the ideal parameters for territory classification have not yet been defined. The aim of this study was to define the optimal criteria for detecting viable myocardium and predicting postrevascularization recovery with rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT. METHODS: In 29 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, tracer activity within asynergic segments was quantified on rest and redistribution 201Tl SPECT. Viability was defined by the presence of functional recovery, which was detected by comparing wall motion in baseline and follow-up echocardiography. Discriminant function analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between 201Tl data and viability. RESULTS: Of 214 dysfunctioning segments (135 a-/dyskinetic), viability was demonstrated in 115 (75 a-/dyskinetic). Both rest and redistribution 201Tl activity in these segments were significantly higher than they were in the nonviable segments (p < 0.0001). Significant (> 10%) reversibility was observed in 39% of the viable and in 36% of the nonviable segments (p = 0.81). Discriminant analysis identified redistribution activity, followed by rest activity, as the most effective predictors of functional recovery. Similar areas were found under the ROC curve for rest (0.68 +/- 0.037) and for redistribution activity (0.70 +/- 0.036) (p = 0.13). ROC curve analysis identified the optimal cutoff for redistribution activity at < 60%, with 147 of 214 (69%) segments correctly classified (sensitivity = 78% and specificity = 58%). In the subset of a-/dyskinetic segments, redistribution activity presented a significantly larger ROC curve area (0.81 +/- 0.038 compared to 0.77 +/- 0.042, p < 0.05), and 103 of 135 (76%) segments were correctly classified (sensitivity = 81% and specificity = 70%). CONCLUSION: Redistribution activity is the most important parameter to be considered in rest-redistribution 201Tl to differentiate viable from nonviable segments; rest activity is also valuable, whereas the meaning of reversibility appears limited. Cutoff values about 60% appear to give the most reasonable balance between sensitivity and specificity.     

A multifactorial trial design to assess combination therapy in hypertension. Treatment with bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide

BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of different dosages and combinations of antihypertensive agents can be efficiently studied using a multifactorial trial design. In consultation with the Cardio-Renal Division of the Food and Drug Administration, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 x 4 factorial trial of bisoprolol, a beta 1-selective adrenergic blocking agent, and hydrochlorothiazide. METHODS: A total of 512 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to once-daily treatment with bisoprolol (0, 2.5, 10, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (0, 6.25, or 25 mg), and all possible combinations. Diastolic and systolic blood pressures were monitored during this 12-week trial. RESULTS: The effects of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide were additive with respect to reductions in diastolic and systolic blood pressures over the dosage ranges studied. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide (or bisoprolol) to therapy with bisoprolol (or hydrochlorothiazide) produced an incremental reduction in blood pressure. Dosages of hydrochlorothiazide as low as 6.25 mg/d contributed a significant antihypertensive effect. A hydrochlorothiazide dosage of 6.25 mg/d produced significantly less hypokalemia and less of an increase in uric acid levels than a dosage of 25 mg/d. The low-dose combination of bisoprolol, 2.5 mg/d, and hydrochlorothiazide, 6.25 mg/d, reduced diastolic blood pressure to lower than 90 mm Hg in 61% of patients and demonstrated a safety profile that compared favorably with that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of factorial design trials to characterize dose-response relationships and to test the potential interactions between various antihypertensive agents has been demonstrated. The combination of low dosages of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide may be a rational alternative to conventional stepped-care therapy for the initial treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.     

Diuretic-based treatment and cardiovascular events in patients with mild renal dysfunction enrolled in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program

BACKGROUND: It is expected that the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal disease decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, but the evidence in these patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of diuretic-based treatment on cardiovascular events in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and renal dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 4336 persons aged 60 years and older with systolic blood pressures of 160 mm Hg and higher and diastolic blood pressures of less than 90 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or chlorthalidone (12.5-25.0 mg/d), with the addition of atenolol (25-50 mg/d) or reserpine (0.05-0.10 mg/d) if needed, and observed for 5 years. The risk of first-occurring cardiovascular events, including stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, heart failure, coronary artery bypass surgery, angioplasty, aneurysm, endarterectomy, sudden death, or rapid death, was stratified according to baseline serum creatinine levels (35.4-84.0, 84.1-101.6, 101.7-119.3, and 119.4-212.2 micromol/L [0.4-0.9, 1.0-1.1, 1.2-1.3, and 1.4-2.4 mg/dL]). RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure reduction was not affected by baseline serum creatinine levels. Active treatment did not affect the risk of serum creatinine levels becoming elevated during follow-up. The risk of hypokalemia with active treatment decreased significantly with increasing baseline serum creatinine levels. In the 4 baseline serum creatinine groups, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of cardiovascular events developing with active treatment was 0.73 (0.54-0.97), 0.63 (0.49-0.82), 0.62 (0.44-0.87), and 0.59 (0.38-0.91). The results were similar for the outcomes of stroke or coronary artery events and in analyses stratified by sex or age. CONCLUSION: Diuretic-based treatment of patients with isolated systolic hypertension prevents the development of cardiovascular events in older persons with mild renal dysfunction.     

Cilostazol has beneficial effects in treatment of intermittent claudication: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is a new phosphodiesterase inhibitor that suppresses platelet aggregation and also acts as a direct arterial vasodilator. This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of cilostazol for treatment of stable, moderately severe intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Study inclusion criteria included age > or =40 years, initial claudication distance (ICD) on treadmill (12.5% incline, 3.2 km/h) between 30 and 200 m, and confirmation of diagnosis of chronic lower-extremity arterial occlusive disease. After stabilization and single-blind placebo lead-in, 81 subjects (62 male, 19 female) from 3 centers were randomized unequally (2:1) to 12 weeks of treatment with cilostazol 100 mg PO BID or placebo. Primary outcome measures included ICD and maximum distance walked (absolute claudication distance, or ACD). Secondary outcome measures included ankle pressures, subjective assessments of benefit by patients and physicians, and safety. Treatment and control groups were similar with respect to age, severity of symptoms, ankle pressures, and smoking status. Statistical analyses used intention-to-treat analyses for each of 77 subjects who had > or =1 treadmill test after initiation of therapy. Comparisons between groups were based on logarithms of ratios of ICD and ACD changes from baseline using ANOVA test at last treatment visit. The estimated treatment effect showed a 35% increase in ICD (P<0.01) and a 41% increase in ACD (P<0.01). There was no significant change in resting or postexercise ankle/brachial indexes. Patients' and physicians' subjective assessments corroborated the measured improvements in walking performance observed in the cilostazol-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol improved walking distances, significantly increasing ICD and ACD. The data suggest cilostazol is safe and well tolerated for the treatment of intermittent claudication.     

Valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. A multiple dose, double-blind, placebo controlled trial comparing combination therapy with monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of valsartan, a novel angiotensin II antagonist, given with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs placebo or vs valsartan or HCTZ alone. DESIGN: 871 adult out-patients with essential hypertension participated in this double-blind study. Patients were randomised in equal number to receive either combination therapy of valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) and HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg), or valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) or HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg) alone, or placebo. Patients were treated once daily for 8 weeks and assessed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) at end-point. The secondary variable was change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to end-point. RESULTS: All active treatments produced a statistically significant difference in MSDBP (P < 0.001) from baseline to end-point compared with placebo. Similar results were obtained for MSSBP. All combination regimens produced a statistically significantly greater reduction in MSDPB and MSSBP than the corresponding monotherapies. Dizziness and headache were the most common treatment-related adverse experiences reported. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of thiazide diuretics, was more commonly reported in the higher dose HCTZ 25 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan 80 mg and 160 mg act additively with HCTZ 12.5 mg or 25 mg to lower MSDBP and MSSBP in patients with essential hypertension. The addition of HCTZ to valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated.     

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II study to determine the activity and toxicity of Caelyx (Doxil; Sequus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Menlo Park, CA) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with stage IV breast cancer were treated with Caelyx at doses of 45 to 60 mg/m2 every 3 to 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Twenty-eight patients had received prior chemotherapy with a nonanthracycline regimen. Fifty-two patients had disease at multiple sites. Hepatic and pulmonary disease were the predominant metastatic site in 50 patients. Response was assessable in 64 cases. RESULTS: Sixteen patients achieved a partial response and a complete response (overall response rate, 31%; (95% confidence interval, 20% to 43%). Twenty patients (31%) had stable disease on treatment. Neutropenia > or = grade 3 occurred in 10% of cycles (27% of patients) and mucositis > or = grade 3 in 10% of cycles (32% of patients). Significant alopecia was rare and routine prophylactic antiemetics were not required. At doses of 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, seven of 13 patients had > or = grade 3 skin toxicity; overall, this toxicity complicated 25% of treatment cycles. The incidence of > or = grade 3 skin toxicity was greatly reduced at doses of 45 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, occurring in five of 32 patients and affecting only 5% of 126 treatment cycles. CONCLUSION: Caelyx is an active agent in advanced breast cancer with a safety profile that differs markedly from nonliposomal doxorubicin. A regimen of 45 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was well tolerated in this cohort of women with advanced poor-prognosis breast cancer. The mild myelosuppression seen with this regimen would favor its use in combination chemotherapy.     

Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with carbon-adsorbed mitomycin in patients with gastric cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of intraperitoneally applied mitomycin bound to activated carbon particles (M-CH) in preventing intraabdominal recurrence following curative surgery for gastric cancer. The Austrian Working Group for Stomach Cancer, a subgroup of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology, initiated a multicentric phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 91 patients with a radically resected gastric cancer infiltrating the serosal surface were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg mitomycin bound to a solution of 375 mg carbo adsorbens intraperitoneally before closure of the abdominal wound (n = 46) or served as a surgical control group (n = 45). Postoperative complications and recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated to analyze the risks and benefits of this treatment. RESULTS: After a median observation period of 597 days (range, 72 to 1,096), a significantly higher postoperative complication rate was observed in the M-CH group (35%) compared with the control group (16%) (P < .02). In accordance with this finding, the postoperative (60 days) mortality rate was also significantly elevated in the M-CH group (11% v 2% in the control group). Since analysis of overall and recurrence-free survival failed to show any beneficial effect of M-CH therapy, the protocol committee decided to stop further recruitment of patients onto this study. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant intraperitoneal therapy of gastric cancer by mitomycin bound to activated carbon particles is associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications. However, no benefit for prognosis following radical resection of locally advanced tumors was observed in this multicenter phase III trial.     

The dexamethasone suppression test and treatment outcome in elderly depressed patients participating in a placebo-controlled multicenter trial involving moclobemide and nortriptyline

A 28-year-old woman was referred to us to undergo 131I therapy who had multiple pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma after total thyroidectomy. There was no increased accumulation of a tracer in the pulmonary metastatic foci on whole-body scanning using a 111 MBq diagnostic dose of 131I. However, the pulmonary metastases were gradually decreased in size, and then clearly reduced 8 months after the start of TSH suppression therapy, which was maintained by T3 instead of T4 to bring down the serum TSH level below 0.1 microU/ml. Reduction rates of the foci were 33-76% on chest X-ray. The reduction was confirmed and no new lesions were found on the serial CT scans. Serum thyroglobulin level was lowered 80 to 25 ng/ml by this suppression therapy and progression of disease was not observed under a 54 months' T3 treatment. Thus, TSH suppression therapy might improve survival of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.     

Leukotrienes in ulcerative colitis: results of a multicenter trial of a leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor, MK-591

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Leukotrienes (LTs) are believed to be important in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to determine whether inhibition of LT biosynthesis with a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (MK-591) induces remission in patients with mild to moderate UC. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients with mild to moderately active UC enrolled in this randomized parallel group, double-blind study. Patients received placebo or MK-591 at a dose of 12.5, 50, or 100 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. A subset of patients underwent rectal dialysis to determine LTB4 concentration. RESULTS: MK-591 reduced LTB4 concentrations in rectal dialysate at the final determination. The median percent of baseline LTB4 concentration for 100 mg taken twice daily was 1.4% (n = 4); for 50 mg taken twice daily, 16.5% (n = 6); for 12.5 mg taken twice daily, 12% (n = 6); and for placebo, 78% (n = 6). There was no correlation between reduction of LTB4 and remission. Patients in remission at week 8 were as follows: placebo, 9 of 44 (20.5%); 100 mg taken twice daily, 11 of 43 (25.6%); 50 mg taken twice daily, 8 of 49 (16.3%); and 12.5 mg taken twice daily, 4 of 47 (8.5%) (P > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: MK-591 markedly inhibited LT biosynthesis, but it did not differ significantly from placebo in clinical efficacy. Inhibition of LT biosynthesis was not effective as a single therapeutic modality in active UC.     

Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine compared with nifedipine retard in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amlodipine for hypertension treatment in comparison with nifedipine retard. METHODS: We examined 31 patients with arterial blood pressure approximately 155-165 mmHg/100-105 mm Hg at the beginning of the trial. It was a randomized double-blind, parallel-group trial including two groups of patients. Patients of the first group were given active amlodipine and nifedipine retard placebo during 6 weeks, while the second group was given active nifedipine retard and amlodipine placebo. Statistical analysis was made using the paired Student's t-test, chi-square test and ANOVA test. RESULTS: At end point we observed significant decrease in arterial blood pressure after treatment of both drugs. The treatment with nifedipine retard increased the mean heart rate of patients. Amlodipine therapy in comparison to nifedipine retard did not change the heart rate in treated patients. Safety parameters: SGOT, SGTP, creatinine and others were in laboratory norms ranges. CONCLUSION: Amlodipine proved to be an effective, more safe and better-tolerated therapeutical alternative for hypertension management than nifedipine retard.     

Diagnostic value of postexercise systolic blood pressure response for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with or without hypertension

To evaluate the diagnostic value of the postexercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) response for detecting and evaluating the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), treadmill testing was conducted in 130 subjects with normal blood pressure and 51 patients with hypertension, each of whom underwent selective coronary angiography. A total of 48 subjects with normal blood pressure and 27 patients with hypertension had no significant narrowing of the coronary artery (control subjects), whereas 82 subjects with normal blood pressure and 24 patients with hypertension had significant narrowing (patients with CAD). The postexercise SBP response was defined on the basis of the SBP ratio (i.e., the SBP at 3 minutes of recovery divided by that at peak exercise). An SBP ratio that exceeded 0.90 (cutoff point for discriminating control subjects from patients with CAD) was considered to be an abnormal SBP response. In the subjects with normal blood pressure, the abnormal SBP response identified CAD as accurately as did ST-segment depression. In the patients with hypertension, the diagnostic accuracy was increased significantly by combining the abnormal SBP response and ST-segment depression (p < 0.01). The SBP ratio increased with the number of diseased coronary arteries. Ten of the 14 patients with a narrowing of the left main coronary artery had an SBP ratio higher than 1.00. The postexercise SBP response may be useful for detecting CAD in patients with and without hypertension and for evaluating the severity of CAD.     

The empirical antibiotic therapy of patients with acute leukemias: the results of a multicenter study

AIM: To evaluate efficacy of ampicilline/sulbactame and fluconasole in the regimen of empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with acute leukemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trial covered 14 hematological departments of Russia and 1 of Ukraine. Acute myeloid leukemia patients were included. 92 cases of fever in 56 patients with analysis of efficacy in 66 cases were considered. At the first stage of empirical antibiotic therapy, cefoperason (4 g/day) and gentamycin (240 mg/day) were administered. If no response was reached, ampicilline/sulbactam (7.5 g/day) was added. This was the second stage. If no response occurred for 5 days the three drugs were joined by fluconasol (400 mg followed by 200 mg). RESULTS: Fever of unclear genesis was cured in 82% (28 of 34), clinical infection--in 80% (20 of 25), microbiologically confirmed infection--in 4 of 7 cases. A complete response to the empirical antibiotic therapy was registered in 52 of 66 cases (79%). 7(10.5%) patients died of infectious complications. 7(10.5%) received other antibiotics.     

Short report: ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in hypertension: a clinical trial of factorial design. The East Germany Collaborative Trial Group

OBJECTIVE: To identify appropriate dosages of ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) when given in combination once a day for the treatment of essential hypertension. DESIGN: A 2- or 4-week placebo run-in followed by 6-week, double-blind, parallel-group phase: 4 x 3 factorial (2.5, 5 and 10 mg ramipril; 12.5 and 25 mg HCT; all six combinations; placebo). SETTING: Office practice (21 centres). PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (World Health Organization stage I-II; supine diastolic blood pressure 100-115 mmHg in last 2 weeks of run-in): 581 enrolled, 534 randomly assigned to double-blind therapy and 517 completed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in supine and standing blood pressure. RESULTS: In pairwise comparisons, the combinations of 5 mg ramipril with 12.5 and 25 mg HCT and 10 mg ramipril with 12.5 mg HCT consistently produced significantly greater blood pressure reductions than their respective components. Response surface analyses were performed, and a stairstep model was constructed to characterize the shape of the dose-response surface. The combinations involving 5 and 10 mg ramipril with 12.5 and 25 mg HCT were again more effective than their components. Withdrawals and adverse effects were minimal for all treatments. A large drop in serum potassium was observed on 25 mg HCT, but not on combination therapy. Addition of ramipril appeared to reduce the hyperuricaemic effect of HCT. CONCLUSIONS: Several dosage combinations of ramipril plus HCT produced significantly greater blood pressure reductions than the monotherapies at the same dosages. Overall, the combination of 5 mg ramipril and 25 mg HCT gave the best mean reduction. Combination therapy with ramipril plus HCT was safe and effective for patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.