The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli.

Eight pigeons were trained on a go-no go visual discrimination involving I S+ and 15 S–s. The 16 discriminative stimuli were black-and-white line drawings created by the factorial combination of 4 different geometric shapes (wedge, cylinder, cone, handle) in 4 different spatial locations (right, left, above, below) in relation to a common shape (cube). All of the pigeons readily learned this complex visual discrimination. Each bird's pecking behavior was controlled by both attributes of the line drawings, but somewhat stronger stimulus control was exerted by the location of the added component than by its shape. Across all 8 pigeons, there was an inverse relation between stimulus control by component shape and component location. These results document pigeons' joint processing of "what" and "where" information in visual discrimination learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pigeons learn stimulus identity and stimulus relations when both serve as redundant, relevant cues during same-different discrimination training.

The authors taught pigeons to discriminate displays of 16 identical items from displays of 16 nonidentical items. Unlike most same-different discrimination studies-where only stimulus relations could serve a discriminative function-both the identity of the items and the relations among the items were discriminative features of the displays. The pigeons learned about both stimulus identity and stimulus relations when these 2 sources of information served as redundant, relevant cues. In tests of associative competition, identity cues exerted greater stimulus control than relational cues. These results suggest that the pigeon can respond to both specific stimuli and general relations in the environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Imitative Learning of Stimulus-Response and Response-Outcome Associations in Pigeons.

A novel automated procedure was used to study imitative learning in pigeons. In Experiments 1 and 2, observer pigeons witnessed a demonstrator pigeon successfully performing an instrumental discrimination in which different discriminative stimuli indicated which of 2 topographically distinct responses (R1 and R2) resulted in the delivery of seed. The observers were then presented with the discriminative stimuli and given access to the response panel. Observer pigeons' behavior during the discriminative stimuli was influenced by how the demonstrator had responded during these stimuli. In Experiment 3, observers witnessed demonstrator pigeons performing R1 for Outcome 1 and R2 for Outcome 2. Observers then received a procedure designed to devalue Outcome 1 relative to Outcome 2 and were subsequently less likely to perform R1 than R2. These results suggest that pigeons can learn both stimulus response and response-outcome associations by observation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia).

Pigeons and undergraduates learned conditional discriminations involving multiple spatially separated stimulus dimensions. Under some conditions, the dimensions were made available sequentially. In 3 experiments, the dimensions were all perfectly valid predictors of the response that would be reinforced and mutually redundant; in 2 others, they varied in validity. In tests with stimuli in which 1 of the 3 dimensions took an anomalous value, most but not all individuals of both species categorized them in terms of single dimensions. When information was delivered as a function of the passage of time, some students, but no pigeons, waited for the most useful information, especially when the cues differed in objective validity. When the subjects could control information delivery, both species obtained information selectively. When cue validities varied, almost all students tended to choose the most valid cues, and when all cues were valid, some chose the cues by which they classified test stimuli. Only a few pigeons chose the most useful information in either situation. Despite their tendency to unidimensional categorization, the pigeons showed no evidence of rule-governed behavior, but students followed a simple “take-the-best” rule. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Three experiments examined the role of contextual information during line orientation and line position discriminations by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Experiment 1 tested pigeons' performance with these stimuli in a target localization task using texture displays. Experiments 2 and 3 tested pigeons and humans, respectively, with small and large variations of these stimuli in a same-different task. Humans showed a configural superiority effect when tested with displays constructed from large elements but not when tested with the smaller, more densely packed texture displays. The pigeons, in contrast, exhibited a configural inferiority effect when required to discriminate line orientation, regardless of stimulus size. These contrasting results suggest a species difference in the perception and use of features and contextual information in the discrimination of line information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Symbolic communication" between two pigeons (Columba livia) without unconditioned reinforcement.

Investigated whether nonhuman organisms can be conditioned to respond discriminatively to abstract features of their environments without unconditioned reinforcement. Two experimentally naive male Birmingham rollers were used as Ss. The procedures of this study replicate parts of the study by R. Epstein et al (see record 1981-07163-001), but with some significant variations. Ss were referred to as "mander" and "tacter" from the beginning of the experiment, even though they met the requirements for manding and tacting only later in the proceedings. The mander and tacter were conditioned in the right and left chambers, respectively. Letters or colors were projected onto individual panels for each S. Results show that 2 pigeons can be conditioned to maintain an interaction in which one pigeon has access to a discriminative stimulus that the other needs in order to emit a reinforced response and responds in the absence of deprivation, aversive stimulation, and unconditioned reinforcement. This finding adds to the class of variables heretofore demonstrated to maintain "symbolic repertoires" and highlights a fresh paradigm for conditioning other spontaneous interactions between and within nonhuman species. The importance of social stimuli in such interchanges is demonstrated. (7 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Mental rotation in pigeons (Columba livia)?

Previous research has shown pigeons to be insensitive to the orientation of visual test stimuli both for response latency and for discrimination ratio. Discrimination of stimulus orientation has been more difficult to learn than discrimination of small arbitrary differences between stimuli. This has suggested that the visual processing of pigeons is orientation invariant, which would obviate the need for mental rotation such as is often observed in studies with human subjects. Contrary to previous findings, the current experiment obtained linear effects of orientation on response latency and discrimination ratio, with a go/no-go procedure. Pigeons (Columbia livia) first learned to discriminate among line drawings of similar objects and then were tested with rotated versions of the drawings. The pattern of data is similar to that found in studies of human recognition of rotated objects. One speculative explanation of this finding is the mental rotation of stimuli by pigeons. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Responses of pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst neurons during acquisition and reversal of a visual discrimination task.

The avian visual "Wulst" is a target of the ascending thalamofugal visual pathway. In pigeons (Columba livia), lesion damage to the Wulst has little effect on simple visual discriminations, but impairs performance on tasks such as reversal learning. We recorded the responses of single Wulst neurons as pigeons were trained on the acquisition and subsequent reversal of a visual discrimination. Of the 64 units recorded, 54 (84%) displayed a significant difference in firing rate between some component of the task and the intertrial interval that separated trials. More important, 14 units (22%) displayed a significant change in firing rate exclusively to the S+ and/or S- as learning progressed either during acquisition or reversal. The responses of these 14 neurons indicate that learning during initial acquisition was as likely to correlate with a change in firing rate as during reversal, and some neuronal responses could be characterized as representing reward properties together with visual stimulus features. As such, responses of pigeon Wulst neurons indicate a role in representing aspects of learning as much as the physical/perceptual properties of visual stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Avoidance learning of perceptual defense and vigilance.

Thirty-two undergraduates were randomly assigned to defense and vigilance training groups. "This study supports the view that perceptual defense and vigilance are learned reactions to anxiety arousing stimuli." A behavior theory analysis of the learning process is proposed. "According to this analysis, perceptual defense is learned when the perceptual response to a threatening stimulus is punished and competing perceptual responses are instrumental to anxiety reduction. Competing perceptual responses when reinforced are strengthened at the expense of the critical perceptual response. Perceptual vigilance is learned when the perceptual response to a threatening stimulus is reinforced by anxiety reduction and competing perceptual responses are punished." Learning for both groups "proceeded in the absence of awareness." (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: Quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator.

Three experiments examined superordinate categorization via stimulus equivalence training in pigeons. Experiment 1 established superordinate categories by association with a common number of food pellet reinforcers, plus it established generalization to novel photographic stimuli. Experiment 2 documented generalization of choice responding from stimuli signaling different numbers of food pellets to stimuli signaling different delays to food reinforcement. Experiment 3 indicated that different numbers of food pellets did not substitute as discriminative stimuli for the photographic stimuli with which the food pellets had been paired. The collective results suggest that the effective mediator of superordinate categories that are established via learned stimulus equivalence is not likely to be an accurate representation of the reinforcer, neither is it likely to be a distinctive response that is made to the discriminative stimulus. Motivational or emotional mediation is a more likely account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Accuracy of brightness discrimination as measured by concurrent verbal responses and GSRs.

"In… subliminal perception experiments some response shows discriminative accuracy at stimulus values below the threshold of awareness determined by classical psychophysical techniques. The procedure is objectionable because the threshold measure admits extraneous variance that the measure of 'subliminal accuracy' does not… . This experiment compares the discriminative accuracy of GSR and verbal response when assessed by the same forced-choice psychophysical technique." Results indicated "the verbal response showed significantly higher correlation with the stimulus than did the GSR… neither response was significantly more accurate than the other." (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Goal recognition and hippocampal formation in the homing pigeon (Columba livia).

Stimulus control of food-site recognition and role of the hippocampal formation (HF) were investigated. Control and HF-lesioned pigeons were trained to find food located in a colored bowl, near a landmark beacon, in a constant room location. During later test trials, the sources of information were individually removed and/or disassociated. For all test trial types, HF-lesioned pigeons consistently chose bowls associated with one of the training stimuli. Controls were more sensitive to the changes introduced during the test trials; choosing like HF-lesioned pigeons on some test trials but choosing randomly on others. The data identify a critical role of the avian HF in learning the spatial relationship among environmental stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sequential Responding and Planning in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) selected either Arabic numerals or colored squares on a computer monitor in a learned sequence. On shift trials, the locations of 2 stimuli were interchanged at some point. More errors were made when this interchange occurred for the next 2 stimuli to be selected than when the interchange was for stimuli later in the sequence. On mask trials, all remaining stimuli were occluded after the 1st selection. Performance exceeded chance levels for only 1 selection after these masks were applied. There was no difference in performance for either stimulus type (numerals or colors). The data indicated that the animals planned only the next selection during these computerized tasks as opposed to planning the entire response sequence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Preserved negative patterning and impaired spatial learning in pigeons (Columba livia) with lesions of the hippocampus.

Pigeons (Columba livia) with bilateral electrolytic lesions of the hippocampus and area parahippocampalis were compared with control pigeons on 2 tasks: negative patterning and delayed spatial alternation. Negative patterning demands configural stimulus representations for its successful solution. The only effect of hippocampal lesions on this task was an increased response rift to the rewarded stimuli. On the delayed spatial alternation task, hippocampal birds showed deficits relative to controls. Differences in the results of prior studies on negative patterning appear to be due to different response requirements to the nonreinforced stimuli. These results are consistent with prior work with rats and suggest that the avian hippocampus is essential for spatial memory and response inhibition but is not involved in configural learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Multiple-landmark piloting in pigeons (Columba livia): Landmark configuration as a discriminative cue.

Using the landmark-transformation technique, researchers have shown that pigeons (Columba livia) tend to encode a goal location relative to 1 landmark, even when multiple landmarks are in the vicinity of the goal. The current experiments examined pigeons' ability to use configural information from a set of landmarks by making the arrangement of 4 landmarks a discriminative cue to the location of buried seeds. Results showed that pigeons used information from the 3 consistently placed landmarks to search accurately when 1 landmark was displaced. Findings indicate that pigeons are able to search for a goal using information from multiple landmarks instead of just 1 and that landmark use by these birds may be more flexible than previously theorized. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Homing in pigeons: the role of the hippocampal formation in the representation of landmarks used for navigation

When given repeated training from a location, homing pigeons acquire the ability to use familiar landmarks to navigate home. Both control and hippocampal-lesioned pigeons succeed in learning to use familiar landmarks for homing. However, the landmark representations that guide navigation are strikingly different. Control and hippocampal-lesioned pigeons were initially given repeated training flights from two locations. On subsequent test days from the two training locations, all pigeons were rendered anosmic to eliminate use of their navigational map and were phase- or clock-shifted to examine the extent to which their learned landmark representations were dependent on the use of the sun as a compass. We show that control pigeons acquire a landmark representation that allows them to directly use landmarks without reference to the sun to guide their flight home, called "pilotage". Hippocampal-lesioned birds only learn to use familiar landmarks at the training location to recall the compass direction home, based on the sun, flown during training, called "site-specific compass orientation." The results demonstrate that for navigation of 20 km or more in a natural field setting, the hippocampal formation is necessary if homing pigeons are to learn a spatial representation based on numerous independent landmark elements that can be used to directly guide their return home.     

Extinction reveals stimulus control: Latent learning of feature-negative discriminations in pigeons.

Tested the possibility that failures to show discriminative acquisition with the feature on negative trials could reflect a deficiency in control of performance rather than a lack of learning. Five experiments with 124 naive White Carneaux pigeons supported this possibility. Ss that had yielded little or no evidence of learning (with distinguishing features like a small white square on the response key or a tone located some distance away) revealed clear differences between keypecking to the formerly positive and negative stimuli when all food was removed from the situation. Other procedures for decreasing the positive predictiveness of the most informative stimulus element also unmasked feature-negative learning, whereas general and specific contextual changes did not. Incompletely mastered feature-positive discriminations improved during extinction. A sign-tracking analysis could not completely account for the results. (31 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Olfactory discrimination, reversal learning, and stimulus control in rats.

Conducted 3 experiments with a total of 21 Wistar rats. In Exp I Ss were trained to discriminate lights, tones, or odors and then given a series of discrimination reversals. Only Ss trained with odors showed positive transfer on the first reversal and acquisition of a reversal set. Other experiments demonstrated that (a) Ss preferentially attended to odors when presented in compound with lights or tones; (b) odors exerted more discriminative control than tones in tests using compound stimuli of competing sign; and (c) after pretraining on the positive stimulus, acquisition of an odor but not a light discrimination occurred with virtually no errors. These results demonstrate the importance of stimulus modality in the establishment of stimulus control and the need for more careful analysis of stimulus factors in cross-species comparisons of learning ability. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A Simon Effect in Pigeons.

Pigeons pecked left versus right keys contingent upon the color presented at 1 of those locations. Spatial-response latencies were shorter when the color appeared at the same location as the required response than at the opposite location. This Simon effect occurred when the stimulus on the alternative key was constant, varied from trial to trial, or changed when the color cue appeared and when the reinforcement probability for correct responses was the same on corresponding as on noncorresponding trials. Humans performing the same task by touching the keys also showed the Simon effect. These findings demonstrate that for pigeons, too, a relevant symbolic cue activates a spatial code that produces faster responses at the location corresponding with the activated code. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Categorization of Above and Below Spatial Relations by Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella).

Using a matching-to-sample procedure, the researchers investigated tufted capuchins' (Cebus apella) ability to form categorical representations of above and below spatial relations. In Experiment 1, 5 capuchins correctly matched bar-dot stimuli on the basis of the relative above and below location of their constituent elements. The monkeys showed a positive transfer of performance both when the bar-dot distance in the two comparison stimuli differed from that of the sample and when the actual location of the matching stimulus and the nonmatching stimulus on the apparatus was modified. In Experiment 2, the researchers systematically changed the shapes of the located object (the dot) or the reference object (the horizontal bar). These manipulations did not affect the monkeys' performance. Overall, the data suggest that capuchins can form abstract, conceptual-like representations for above and below spatial relations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)