Supply chain management ontology from an ontology engineering perspective

Knowledge sharing and reuse are important factors affecting the performance of supply chains. These factors can be amplified in information systems by supply chain management (SCM) ontology. The literature provides various SCM ontologies for a range of industries and tasks. Although many studies make claims of the benefits of SCM ontology, it is unclear to what degree the development of these ontologies is informed by research outcomes from the ontology engineering field. This field has produced a set of specific engineering techniques, which are supposed to help developing quality ontologies. This article reports a study that assesses the adoption of ontology engineering techniques in 16 SCM ontologies. Based on these findings, several implications for research as well as SCM ontology adoption are articulated.     

Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME methodology

The fast emergent and continuously evolving areas of the Semantic Web and Knowledge Management make the incorporation of ontology engineering tasks in knowledge-empowered organizations and in the World Wide Web more than necessary. In such environments, the development and evolution of ontologies must be seen as a dynamic process that has to be supported through the entire ontology life cycle, resulting to living ontologies. The aim of this paper is to present the Human-Centered Ontology Engineering Methodology (HCOME) for the development and evaluation of living ontologies in the context of communities of knowledge workers. The methodology aims to empower knowledge workers to continuously manage their formal conceptualizations in their day-to-day activities and shape their information space by being actively involved in the ontology life cycle. The paper also demonstrates the Human Centered ONtology Engineering Environment, HCONE, which can effectively support this methodology. George VOUROS (B.Sc. Ph.D.) holds a B.Sc. in Mathematics, and a Ph.D. in Artificial Intelligence all from the University of Athens, Greece. Currently he is a Professor and Head of the Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, Greece, Director of the AI Lab and head of the Intelligent and Cooperative Systems Group (InCoSys). He has done research in the areas of Expert Systems, Knowledge management, Collaborative Systems, Ontologies, and Agent-based Systems. His published scientific work includes more than 80 book chapters, journal and national and international conference papers in the above-mentioned themes. He has served as program chair and chair and member of organizing committees of national and international conferences on related topics. Konstantinos KOTIS (B.Sc. Ph.D.) holds a B.Sc. in Computation from the University of Manchester, UK (1995), and a Ph.D. in Information Management from University of the Aegean, Greece (May, 2005). Currently, he is a member of the Intelligent and Cooperative Systems Group (InCoSys) and director of the Information Technology Department of the Prefecture of Samos, Greece. His research and published work concerns Knowledge management, Ontology Engineering and Semantic Web. He has lectured in several IT seminars and has served as member of program committees in international workshops.     

A social software/Web 2.0 approach to collaborative knowledge engineering

Expert systems have traditionally captured the explicit knowledge of a single expert or source of expertise in order to automatically provide conclusions or classifications within a narrow problem domain. This is in stark contrast to social software which enables knowledge communities to share implicit knowledge of a more practical or experiential nature to inform individuals and groups to arrive at their own conclusions. Specialists are often needed to elicit and encode the knowledge in the case of expert systems, whereas one of the (claimed) hallmarks of social software and the Web 2.0 trend, such as Wikis and Blogs, is that everyone, anywhere can chose to contribute input. This openness in authoring and sharing content, however, tends to produce unstructured knowledge that is difficult to execute, reason over or automatically validate. This also poses limitations for its reuse. To facilitate the capture of knowledge-in-action which spans both explicit and tacit knowledge types, a knowledge engineering approach which offers Wiki-style collaboration is introduced. The approach extends a combined rule and case-based knowledge acquisition technique known as Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules to allow multiple users to collaboratively view, define and refine a knowledge base over time and space.