Masonry buildings at the borderline to high‐rise – Part 2 / Mauerwerksbauten an der Hochhausgrenze – Teil 2

For the verification of framing shear walls of masonry, the decisive combination of actions derives from the interaction of vertical and horizontal actions. In this article, a method based on simple truss models is extended for the transfer of horizontal actions. It is demonstrated how the required verifications of load‐bearing safety can be performed with the results of the structural calculation. As an example, the application of the method for a seven‐storey building with calcium silicate blockwork or Poroton brick masonry is described.     

Bracing systems in masonry buildings. Part 1: Simple application of FE programs / Aussteifungssysteme im Mauerwerksbau. Teil 1: Einfache Anwendung von FE‐Programmen

Due to the low tensile strength of masonry perpendicular to the bed joint, masonry wall panels have non‐linear material properties. Assuming simple elastic constitutive laws, this article presents two modelling variants, which consider the lack of tensile strength in a simple manner. Both variants are investigated for their advantages and disadvantages. In a second part of the article, the application of the methods will be illustrated through the example of a four‐storey building.     

Bracing systems in masonry buildings / Aussteifungssysteme im Mauerwerksbau

In this article, an FE analysis model suitable in engineering practice for masonry bracing walls acting as deep beams without tensile strength is compared with simple models based on trusses. The results of both processes are compared through the example of a four‐storey building of Poroton masonry.     

Practical application of a non‐linear earthquake analysis according to DIN EN 1998‐1 / Praktische Anwendung einer nichtlinearen Erdbebenanalyse nach DIN EN 1998‐1

Seismic safety verification can be performed by maintaining constructive rules or by calculation. Verification by calculation can be performed with a linear simplified or linear multi‐modal response spectrum analysis. Alternatively, a non‐linear quasi‐static verification is also possible according to DIN EN 1998‐1, which was not available in DIN 4149. In this article, the non‐linear quasi‐static earthquake verification according to DIN EN 1998‐1 is presented in practice, using the example of a building in Mittenwald/Germany. The verification has been checked and accepted by an independent building supervision report.     

Design of masonry buildings of three‐layered units according to Eurocode 6 / Bemessung von Mauerwerksbauten aus Dreischichtsteinen nach Eurocode 6

In the recent past, the masonry industry has developed many different solutions for optimising the heat protection of buildings. This took place for the building materials, geometric design, but also by development of multiple layered stones in which the components masonry unit, insulation and outer shell have been integrated into a block.     

New approach for spacing of movement joints in reinforced and unreinforced masonry veneer walls. Part 1: Unreinforced masonry / Neue Bemessungsmethode für die Abstände von Dehnungsfugen in bewehrten und unbewehrten Verblendmauerwerksschalen. Teil 1: Unbewehrtes Mauerwerk

The spacing of movement joints has been subject of many discussions. The current methods for the determination of the spacing of movement joints are based on local traditions and bad experience with cracked veneer walls. This has resulted in various design rules throughout Europe with very stringent limits for spacing of movement joints. According to EC6, one of the solutions for increasing the spacing of movement joints is to introduce bed joint reinforcement, although unfortunately no specific design rules are given. Until now, most scientific research has been focused on numerical simulations without taking time‐dependent effects into account, which is a conservative approach. In this paper, a new approach is described. It is based on Peter Schubert's model and on practical experience with masonry buildings.     

Reliability of masonry walls subjected to in‐plane loading: A slip failure along head joints / Zuverlässigkeit von Mauerwerkswänden bei Belastung in der Ebene: Versagen entlang der Stoßfugenflucht

Masonry structures are a sustainable, economical and traditionally widely used type of construction. However, current masonry design codes are rather conservative, so there is a growing need for revision i.e. calibration of safety factors to improve the allocation of material resources. In this paper, we investigate the probability of occurrence of slip failure along head joints (perpends) in masonry subjected to in‐plane loading. An appropriate limit state function is established and the masonry material properties and loads are defined as random variables in order to simulate likelihood of occurrence of a slip failure regime along the head joints. Furthermore, an example of masonry wall with probabilistic analysis outcomes using Monte Carlo simulation is presented and recommendations for further work are provided.     

Veneer walls of masonry as specified in EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA) / Zweischaliges Mauerwerk nach EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA)

This article deals with the production of veneer walls as specified in DIN EN 1996‐2/NA [3]. Against this background of the extensive revision of the section for veneer walls an exposition in accordance with the previous requirements as specified in DIN 1053‐1 can hardly be recommended. The necessity for a basic revision of the section for veneer wall construction has already been discussed in detail and justified in several technical articles published in previous years, see [4] to [7]. With many changes and corrections in the section for veneer walls in the National Annex of DIN EN 1996‐2 [8] it is certainly not a question of new rules for this method of building, but an adjustment of the requirements in the previous standard on the basis of the practical experience gained over several years. The new requirements for the execution of cavity facing masonry enable a simple and economic implementation of this external wall construction.     

Longitudinal compressive strength of masonry – Simplified calculation approach / Längsdruckfestigkeit von Mauerwerk – Vereinfachter Berechnungsansatz

For the structural analysis of the bending compression zone of masonry building elements, which are loaded under bending compression parallel to the bed joints, the longitudinal compressive strength of the masonry is required. According to the code, this value has until now been determined in laborious tests on masonry building elements or calculated analogously to the approach for the determination of the compressive strength perpendicular to the bed joints. In such a way, the actual failure mechanisms of masonry under compression loading parallel to the bed joints and relevant influential parameters for the longitudinal compressive strength however remain unconsidered. The article presents a proposal for the determination of minimum values of the longitudinal compressive strength of masonry in a simplified form for structural design purposes, which include consideration of both the relevant failure cases and also the significant influential parameters.     

Investigation of the seismic out‐of‐plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls

The structural stability of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls has to be guaranteed not only under static (permanent and live) loads but also under earthquake loads. Loads transverse to the plane (out‐of‐plane) often have a decisive influence on the load‐bearing capacity. In practical applications, simplified methods from codes, guidelines and literature are often used to analyse and evaluate the out‐of‐plane capacity of load‐bearing and non‐load‐bearing URM walls. The results of these simplified methods can be significantly conservative and inaccurate since essential influencing effects are neglected. For many existing buildings, the simplified methods underestimate the capacity, which leads to cost‐intensive retrofitting and strengthening measures or complete replacement by other wall systems. In order to realistically estimate the out‐of‐plane capacity, parameters such as wall geometry, boundary conditions, vertical loads and especially dynamic effects (e.g. inertia forces) have to be taken into account. In this paper, non‐linear time history simulations are presented to investigate the influence of these effects. The numerically determined maximum acceptable earthquake acceleration is compared with results from simplified analysis models. The comparison shows that the out‐of‐plane capacity is significantly higher than the values predicted by simplified models. Finally, several initial experimental seismic tests conducted on the shaking table of the TU Kaiserslautern are presented, together with the planned extensive experimental test program on the out‐of‐plane capacity of masonry walls.     

Experimental determination of the load‐bearing capacity of a reinforced perforated brick facade

For a new multi‐storey car park over the Central Bus Station (ZOB) in Kiel, a perforated clinker brick veneer facade not conforming to standards was planned. The design and technical characteristics of the facade have already been described in the article by Medzech and Schrade in this issue [1]. This article deals with the experimental investigations carried out to obtain a project‐related one‐off approval (ZiE). These experiments contain in particular large tests on storey‐height wall sections, which were subjected to eccentric compressive loading and partly to horizontal loads representing wind action. Supplementary small tests on unreinforced and reinforced masonry served to determine the bending capacity, the anchoring capacity of the reinforcement and the load‐bearing capacity of the wall anchors in the masonry. Due to the special facade construction with special bricks for the project, wall anchors, reinforcement bar couplers and unique test set‐ups had to be developed for the specific project.     

Extension of the conditions for application of the simplified calculation methods according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA for the design of unreinforced masonry walls

Dedicated to University Prof. Dr.‐Ing. Carl‐Alexander Graubner for his 60th birthday The simplified calculation methods for unreinforced masonry structures given in DIN EN 1996‐3/NA are an easily applicable design standard for an efficient and fast verification of the resistance of mainly vertically loaded masonry walls. However, the design rules are not based on mechanical models. Instead, they are empirical approaches for a simplified estimation of the load bearing capacity. For this reason, the range of application of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA is limited by several conditions to ensure a sufficient safety of this design procedure. With regard to extending the conditions for application, extensive comparative calculations were carried out. Thereby, considering clearly defined boundary conditions, the load bearing capacity according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA was compared to that according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA. It was the aim of this comparison to identify load bearing reserves of the simplified calculation methods to point out potential for an extension regarding the maximum permissible clear wall height and the slab span. As a result, it can be stated, that an increase of the maximum wall height up to 6.0 m and the maximum slab span of 7.0 m is possible in certain cases.     

Design tables for the utilisation factor α6,fi for the structural fire design of masonry according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA in the simplified calculation method

Easy‐to‐use verification equations are available for the verifications in the simplified calculation method. This applies also for the structural fire design of those masonry types for which a verification with the utilisation factor α_fi is given in the National Annex DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA. In specific applications, however, a classification can only be made applying the utilisation factor α_6,fi. In these cases, the verification for the structural fire design by calculation is considerably more complex than the mathematical verification of the structural design in the ”cold state“. The present paper shows how the design equation for α_6,fi can be made significantly easier with regard to its application by reference to the design value of the vertical load bearing resistance in the simplified method. Moreover, an upper limit value for the utilisation factor α_6,fi for the simplified method is summarised in tables.     

Reinforced bending load‐stressed masonry – Suggestions for future designs / Bewehrtes biegedruckbeanspruchtes Mauerwerk – Vorschläge für zukünftige Bemessungen

European standardization bodies are currently working on the amendment to EN 1996‐1‐1, which will also affect the evaluation of reinforced masonry in Germany. For that reason, discussion suggestions are being made here for revisions to lay the groundwork for building materials evaluations and especially, evaluations of bending load‐stressed masonry walls or beams at their serviceability limit state (SLS) for load‐bearing capacities. Information already presented in E DIN 1053‐3:2008‐03 [N3] is being incorporated as well. Characteristic values for the compressive strength of the masonry parallel to the bed joints f_k,∥ are essential for the design of reinforced masonry, although they are currently not included in national application documents for Germany. For the time being, they can be mathematically calculated using conversion factors for the characteristic compressive strength values vertical to the bed joints f_k or by using the declared axial compressive strengths of the masonry units. The ultimate strains for masonry in general should be set consistently at ?_mu = ∣–0.002∣ as several masonry types do not exhibit higher compressive strain values. The use of steel strains higher than ?_su = 0.005 does not change any measurement results. Varying stress‐strain curves of the constitutive equations on masonry under compressive strain (parabolic, parabolic‐rectangular, tension block) lead to differing values of recordable bending moments despite having the same mechanical reinforcement percentage at higher normal forces. Therefore, clear guidelines should be made for the type of applicable constitutive equation for masonry walls under compressive strain. With the introduction of a tension block, the number values of the reduction factors λ for the compression zone height x, which is dependent on limit strains, and where applicable, reduced compressive strength, need to be determined, as with reinforced concrete construction. A modification of the bending moment based on the second order theory according to [N4] is presented for the calculation of reinforced masonry walls in danger of buckling. The use of reduction factors for the load capacity of the masonry cross section, such as for unreinforced masonry, does not appear to be appropriate as buckling safety evidence because here, the design task is the determination of a required reinforcement cross section.     

National Standards of the People’s Republic of China – Thoughts of revision on technical specification for application of autoclaved aerated concrete / Nationale Standards der Volksrepublik China – Gedanken zur Überarbeitung der technischen Spezifikationen für die Anwendung von dampfgehärtetem Porenbeton

The revision task on technical specification for application of autoclaved aerated concrete products JGJ/T17 is under way, which was assigned in November 2013.The framework, thoughts and contents of revision on the specification are presented in this paper.     

Design aids for unreinforced masonry under bending compression – Part 2: Application of design aids for structural design according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA

The semi‐probabilistic safety concept of divided safety factors for action and resistance of DIN EN 1990 [1] in combination with the structural design codes DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 [2] and DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA [3] include the requirement that acting normal forces N_Ed may not exceed the normal force resistances N_Rd for the structural design of masonry under bending compression. According to [3], fully plastic material behaviour can be assumed and the stress block used as the material law for masonry. Building on this, design aids and their theoretical basis were presented in Part 1 of this scientific paper [4], which are comparable with the ω tables (called the ? table here) and the general design diagram for massive construction. The application of the design aids is described in this second part of this scientific paper through calculation examples and the connection with the calculation approaches of [3] is made clear. The relation to the reduction factor ?_m, which covers effects of 2^nd order theory, is also obtained. With known values of the load eccentricities according to 1^st and 2^nd order theory, the design task becomes the analysis of the loadbearing capacity of the masonry section at half wall height. Knowing ?_m, the load eccentricity e₂ and the additional moment according to 2^nd order theory can subsequently be determined, which does not ensue from the calculation equations of [3]. With the general design diagram, the values of compression zone height and the assumed load eccentricities of the acting normal forces, which result from the reset rule for masonry sections with high load eccentricities, can be directly read off, greatly improving the clarity of this procedure.     

Loadbearing capacity of infill masonry walls considering the deformation‐based membrane effect

According to currently valid codes, it is not possible to determine the loadbearing capacity of unreinforced infill walls considering the deformation‐based membrane effect by incorporating the exact support conditions. One reason for this is the lack of a validated calculation procedure, which in addition to the equilibrium conditions also realistically represents the compatibility conditions of these systems. In the present paper, therefore, a new non‐linear analytical calculation procedure is presented. The main focus of the analysis of walls subject to area loading is the incorporation of the support conditions and thus the consideration of the deformation‐based membrane compressive force. Through generalised formulation and a standardised notation of the determination equations, different material behaviours and various support conditions can be taken into account with few parameters. On the action side, both lighter loading like wind loads and heavier loading like explosion loads can be considered. Through the implementation of the partial factor concept, it is possible to comply with the requirements of European codes and thus ensure the applicability of the analysis model.     

Application of the partial safety concept for complex non‐linear calculations through the example of Friedrichswerder Church in Berlin

Non‐linear analysis of special structures is routine practice in every engineering design office. Current code provisions provide no sufficient regulations or clear procedures on how to use partial safety factors in non‐linear analyses. The present paper introduces some specific problems of masonry structures from practice. Limit state functions of vertically loaded masonry walls were investigated. A reliability study shows that the decisive case of verification can be obtained by considering a special combination of material parameters. The study also indicates the importance of considering a partial factor for the elastic modulus to account for stability failure. This proposed procedure has been applied to a practical example, the Friedrichswerder Church. The stability of the church has been checked with many FEM models at the macro level.     

Dry laying of masonry to build demountable,highly energy‐efficient prototype houses – First findings from a currently running research project

In recent decades, energy efficiency has been the priority for masonry buildings in order to keep up with ever more stringent requirements. For the evaluation of the sustainability of building solutions, however, the embodied energy to produce a building and finally to dispose of it at the end of its lifecycle are also important. The energy used for the disposal of a building and the processing of the residues are also important for the overall energy balance since the handling of natural resources is increasingly the centre point of thought and action. A research team at the Chair of Structural Design of TU Dresden has thus been working since 2012 on demountable solutions in masonry, which can be dismantled at the end of a building lifetime and sorted for recycling, which fully complies with the requirement for the reduction of rubbish and waste products. The high precision of block production today permits us to omit the levelling effect of mortar and to build dry buildings in the future, i.e. to do without the bonding principle. The associated strength reductions can be suffered without problems. The appropriate basics of such a dry building method have been researched in a collaboration between the ILEK in Stuttgart and the Xella Technologie‐ und Forschungsgesellschaft mbH in Emstal. In this research project with the abbreviation ”REMOMAB“, the basics of an energy‐efficient dry building method suitable for recycling were collected and made available for practical application. In a follow‐up project, these basics are being implemented and tested on an experimental building. Cost aspects are also to be taken into account and if possible, construction solutions available on the market will be used – modified if necessary. Another aim is for the first time to dismantle such a building and to rebuild it at another location. This is intended to demonstrate that a reuse is possible after dismantling and such a building method can react to changing demands in the housing market.