Guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in remission

The role is reviewed of sulphasalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids in the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis in remission. Sulphasalazine and oral 5-ASA are the drugs of first choice in preventing relapses for patients suffering from intermittent chronic ulcerative colitis. Rectally administered 5-ASA may be a valid alternative for treating patients with proctitis and left-sided ulcerative colitis. The optimal dosage of oral 5-ASA in the maintenance therapy of ulcerative colitis in remission is not clear. However, there is evidence that a higher dose of 5-ASA is more effective than low dosage in preventing relapses in patients in remission. For patients with chronically active or steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis who have achieved remission while taking immunosuppressants, continuing azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine is indicated. Existing data cast doubts as to whether or not continuous maintenance is still necessary in patients suffering from intermittent chronic ulcerative colitis with prolonged endoscopic, clinical and histological remission.     

Pharmacokinetics of nicotine carbomer enemas: a new treatment modality for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis is largely a disease of nonsmokers, and transdermal nicotine is of therapeutic value in the active disease. Because side effects are common, we developed a topical enema formulation of nicotine. OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of nicotine complexed with a polyacrylic carbomer and administered by enema to eight healthy volunteers and to eight patients with active ulcerative colitis, verified sigmoidoscopically. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 16 subjects were nonsmokers. The mean age for normal subjects was 33 years; the mean for patients with ulcerative colitis was 60 years. Median stool frequency for patients with ulcerative colitis was four daily. Patients were taking 5-amino salicylic acid compounds and five were taking oral prednisolone (median dose, 12 mg daily). Nicotine, 6 mg, complexed with carbomer 974P, 400 mg, was administered in a 100 ml enema after an overnight fast, with serial blood measurements taken over 8 hours. Serum nicotine and cotinine were measured by gas liquid chromatography. Area under the concentration-time curves were calculated by the trapezoidal method, and the terminal elimination half-life was derived by extrapolation of the log-linear terminal phase. RESULTS: With the exception of nicotine time to reach peak concentration, which was longer in patients (median of 60 minutes compared with 45 minutes; p < 0.005), other comparisons between normal subjects and patients showed no statistically significant difference, although there was considerable inter-subject variation. Maximum concentration of nicotine, 8.1 +/- 3.5 ng/ml, in the 16 subjects occurred after a median of 60 minutes (range, 30 to 180 minutes); maximum cotinine concentrations of 60.4 +/- 11.5 ng/ml occurred after 4 hours. Side effects in five subjects were mild (four subjects) or moderate (one subject) and included lightheadedness, nausea, and headache; these five subjects were female lifelong nonsmokers of low body weight. CONCLUSION: Because most of the active ingredient of nicotine is converted to continine on the first pass through the liver, substantial concentrations can be achieved at the site of disease with only modest rises in serum nicotine, which are responsible for side effects; cotinine has low pharmacologic activity. Topical administration of nicotine may be useful treatment for distal ulcerative colitis.     

Unexpected rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria in a patient in the supine position

BACKGROUND: The relapse rate after steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease is high. AIMS: To test whether oral pH modified release budesonide (3 x 1 mg/day) reduces the relapse rate and to identify patient subgroups with an increased risk of relapse. METHODS: In a multicentre, randomised, double blind study, 179 patients with steroid induced remission of Crohn's disease received either 3 x 1 mg budesonide (n = 84) or placebo (n = 95) for one year. The primary study aim was the maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease for one year. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at study entry were similar for both groups. The relapse rate was 67% (56/84) in the budesonide group and 65% (62/95) in the placebo group. The relapse curves in both groups were similar. The mean time to relapse was 93.5 days in the budesonide group and 67.0 days in the placebo group. No prognostic factors allowing prediction of an increased risk for relapse or definition of patient subgroups who derived benefit from low dose budesonide were found. Drug related side effects were mild and no different between the budesonide and the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Oral pH modified release budesonide at a dose of 3 x 1 mg/day is not effective for maintaining steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease.     

Pharmacokinetics and retrograde colonic spread of budesonide enemas in patients with distal ulcerative colitis

METHODS: The retrograde spread of two budesonide enema formulations with different viscosities was investigated. The study design was open, randomized and two-period crossover. Three female and two male patients (age range: 35-45 years) with distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis participated. Both enema formulations contained a dose of 2 mg budesonide/100 mL. An unabsorbable radioactive marker (99mTc-labelled human serum albumin microcolloid) was added to the enema just before administration. All doses were given in the evening with the patients lying in a supine position during the whole investigation. The intestinal spread was followed for 8 h using scintigraphic imaging. Plasma samples for budesonide assay were taken during the 12 h after administration of the low viscosity enema. RESULTS: Budesonide plasma levels were measurable for up to 4-6 h. Cmax was 2.5 nmol/L (range: 0.9-4.5 nmol/L) and was attained in 1.5 h (range 1-3 h). The patients had no difficulty in retaining the enemas. There was a statistically significant difference in spread between the low and high viscosity enema. The low viscosity enema spread over an area situated between the rectum and the splenic flexure. The spread occurred mainly in the first 15 min after administration. In contrast, the high viscosity enema, in most cases, spread only over a minor part of this area and the rate and extent of spreading was also more variable with this formulation. CONCLUSION: The spread of a low viscosity enema appears to be well suited for the treatment of proctitis and distal colitis.     

Long-term oral corticosteroid therapy does not alter the results of immediate-type allergy skin prick tests

BACKGROUND: Medications can modulate the results of skin prick tests (SPTs). Short-term corticosteroid therapy does not alter IgE-mediated skin tests, but the impact of long-term oral corticosteroid therapy on SPT results is unclear. A prospective study was carried out in patients with steroid-dependent asthma who received oral corticosteroids for a long period to determine whether this treatment reduced skin test reactivity. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with steroid-dependent asthma (median age, 59 years) were compared with 66 patients with asthma who served as a control group, matched for age, sex, and atopic status. SPTs with codeine phosphate and a screening battery of standardized allergen extracts were performed before commencement and after at least 1 year of daily oral prednisone treatment (median duration, 2 years; median daily dose, 20 mg). RESULTS: Fifteen patients with corticosteroid-dependent asthma were allergic before treatment, and their sensitization was not changed by long-term treatment with oral corticosteroids. The median wheal diameters induced by codeine phosphate were similar in both groups. The median wheal diameters induced by allergens, and more specifically, by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae were similar in both groups and did not change in the steroid group after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic corticosteroid therapy (prednisone, 10 to 60 mg/day) for 2 or more years does not seem to alter SPT reactivity.     

Methotrexate in the management of severe steroid dependent asthma

AIMS: This study was designed to assess the efficacy of low dose methotrexate, 15 mg weekly, as a steroid-sparing agent in asthmatic patients requiring long-term oral prednisone treatment. METHODS: The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, cross over study of 48 weeks duration. Eleven patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma were included. A successful outcome was defined as a reduction in mean prednisone requirements of 7 mg daily compared to baseline requirements, during active treatment. RESULTS: Two patients were required to be withdrawn owing to methotrexate-related adverse effects. The mean prednisone dose for patients who completed the study was 14.4 mg per day (95% CI; 13.6, 15.1) during active treatment, and 12.9 mg per day (95% CI: 12.2, 13.6) during placebo treatment (NS). Only one patient reduced his individual dose requirements by more than 7 mg per day, whereas in three patients prednisone requirements actually increased during active treatment. There were no significant differences in symptom scores, pulmonary function data, and exacerbations between active and placebo treatments. CONCLUSION: No significant steroid-sparing effect was obtained using low dose methotrexate in this study. This negative outcome may be attributable to the small population of patients studied, low baseline FEV1, and the omission of a steroid minimisation run-in period. Our results highlight the importance of careful patient selection and a painstaking approach in the management of patients with steroid-dependent asthma.     

Cyclosporin for the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis

The effect of cyclosporin was evaluated in six patients with severe ulcerative colitis not responding to at least 8 days of standard therapy with intravenous corticosteroids. Cyclosporin (5-7.5 mg/kg/day intravenously) was added while steroid therapy was continued. Five of 6 patients responded after a mean of 7 days and colectomy was not necessary. After 4 weeks three patients achieved clinical remission or had mild symptoms and were weaned from cyclosporin and corticosteroids without exacerbation within the next 7-15 months. Two patients improved and they were put on oral cyclosporin. One of them relapsed after 2 weeks and then responded to high dose corticosteroids. This patient is doing well at 8 months of followup on azathioprine and steroids. One patient stopped oral cyclosporin after 3 months abruptly and then had a relapse. He subsequently improved while refusing any medical therapy. Side effects of cyclosporin occurred in 2 patients but were mild and self limited and did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. Cyclosporin appears to be effective in a large portion of patients with severe ulcerative colitis who failed to improve on corticosteroids and in whom colectomy would otherwise be considered.     

Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

BACKGROUND: The role of long-acting, inhaled beta2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide. METHODS: After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 microg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days. RESULTS: The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were reduced by 26 percent and 40 percent, respectively, when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The higher dose of budesonide alone reduced the rates of severe and mild exacerbations by 49 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Patients treated with formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide had the greatest reductions -- 63 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Symptoms of asthma and lung function improved with both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide, but the improvements with formoterol were greater. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids, the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy or the use of a higher dose of budesonide may be beneficial. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy improves symptoms and lung function without lessening the control of asthma.     

Cervical actinomycosis. A rare differential diagnosis of parotid tumor]

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is usually treated with oral antihistamines or nasal steroids. Topically active nasal antihistamine is a new treatment modality for allergic rhinitis. The efficacy in comparison to well established topical treatment alternatives is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intranasally administered azelastine to budesonide, at their respectively recommended dosage, on the symptoms of perennial rhinitis patients. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension (256 microg once daily) with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray (280 microg twice daily (560 microg/day)) and with placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The 195 patients (with at least a 2-year history of perennial allergic rhinitis) recorded individual nasal symptom scores, the degree of symptom control achieved and any adverse events experienced over a 2-week baseline period and a 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Following treatment, the reductions in mean combined and individual nasal symptom scores from baseline values were significantly greater in the budesonide group compared with the placebo group (P < .0001 for all variables except runny nose P = .01). In patients treated with budesonide, there were also significantly larger reductions from baseline values in combined nasal symptom scores (P < .01) and in scores for all individual nasal symptoms (P < or = .05) compared with those treated with azelastine. The reductions from baseline in both combined and individual nasal symptom scores did not differ between azelastine and placebo. The study medications were well tolerated, producing no unexpected or serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: A once-daily dose of 256 microg of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension is significantly more effective at relieving the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis compared with a twice daily dose of 280 microg of azelastine nasal spray.     

Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients

OBJECTIVE: Transdermal nicotine appears to be of benefit in the short-term treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to determine its long-term effects. DESIGN: A randomized, comparative study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate clinical relapses of left-sided ulcerative colitis during maintenance treatment with mesalamine 1 g b.i.d. were allocated to an additional treatment with either transdermal nicotine or prednisone for 5 weeks. The first consecutive 15 patients per group, with clinical and endoscopic signs of remission, were followed up for 6 months, while continuing mesalamine maintenance treatment. RESULTS: Relapses of active colitis were observed in 20% of patients formerly treated with nicotine and in 60% of patients in the prednisone group (P = 0.027). Relapses occurred earlier in the latter group. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that nicotine is useful in cases of ulcerative colitis with mild or moderate activity and suggest that remissions induced by nicotine may last longer than those obtained with oral corticosteroids.     

Text analysis of critical areas narrated by adolescents at an advisory service

AIM: To compare beclomethasone dipropionate 3 mg/60 mL enema (BDP) and prednisolone sodium phosphate 30 mg/60 mL enema (PP) once daily in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled in a multicentre, 4-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement of clinical activity after 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopy and biopsy showed a reduction in the activity score at the end of the treatment period in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups. After 4 weeks, 29% of patients in the BDP group and 25% in the PP group were considered to be in clinical remission; an improvement was observed in 40% of patients on BDP and in 47% on PP. Mean morning plasma cortisol levels showed a slight but significant reduction in the PP group, while the ACTH test showed that neither drug interfered with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. No significant changes were observed in the laboratory tests. Finally, there was a low incidence of adverse events in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, in the topical treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, BDP 3 mg enemas are as efficacious as PP 30 mg enemas, without interference with the HPA axis.     

Combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets and enemas for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis: a randomized double-blind study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a combination of oral and topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis, we undertook a double-blind randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 yr (with disease extent greater than proctitis only) were eligible for inclusion in the study if they met the following criteria: (a) history of two or more relapses in the last year; (b) achievement of remission in the last 3 months (with maintenance of remission for at least 1 month). Patients enrolled in the study were randomly assigned to one of the two following 1-yr treatments: (1) combined therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and 5-ASA enemas 4 g/100 ml twice weekly; (2) oral therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and placebo enemas/twice weekly. The main end point of the study was the maintenance of remission at 12 months. RESULTS: Upon completion of the study, relapse occurred in 13 of 33 patients in the combined treatment group versus 23 of 36 patients in the oral treatment group (39 vs 69%; p = 0.036). No significant side effects related to treatment were observed in either group. A simplified pharmacoeconomic analysis shows that this form of combined treatment can have a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that 5-ASA given daily by oral route and intermittently by topical route can be more effective than oral therapy alone. This form of combination treatment can be appropriate for patients at high risk of relapse.     

A methodological assessment of diurnal variability of peak flow as a basis for comparing different inhaled steroid formulations

BACKGROUND: A "survival" model offers certain ethical and practical advantages over alternative experimental designs if used to compare antiasthmatic inhaled steroid formulations. The model requires an objective daily measure of therapeutic effect (e.g., peak expiratory flow rate, which may be expressed as the lower of two daily measurements (LPF) or as diurnal variability (DVPF). The relative efficiency of these two measures is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the relative efficiency of LPF and DVPF. METHODS: We analyzed data from a placebo-controlled comparison of an active inhaled formulation of budesonide versus an inactive oral formulation. The primary outcome measure in this design is the number of days from the time the test treatments start until a statistically significant deterioration occurs from an optimal asthma control value established at baseline. RESULTS: DVPF proved less sensitive than LPF; that is, fewer patients relapsed during the 8-week trial period: 32 versus 41, respectively. Also, the median interval until relapse was longer: 24 versus 9 days. With LPF, inhaled budesonide proved more effective than placebo or oral budesonide (p = 0.03), whereas DVPF failed to discriminate among the test treatments (p = 0.38). LPF correlated with all three symptom indices (p > or = 0.003) and two of three spirometric indices measured concomitantly (p < or = 0.04). DVPF did not correlate with any index (p > or = 0.10). CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, LPF proved more sensitive and valid than DVPF as an indicator of differences in antiasthmatic potency between two inhaled steroid formulations.     

Risk indicators for inflammatory bowel disease

We investigated the association between different risk indicators and inflammatory bowel disease in a case-control study based on the population of Stockholm County during 1980-1984. Information on physical activity, oral contraceptives, some previous diseases and childhood characteristics was collected using a postal questionnaire for 152 cases of Crohn's disease, 145 cases of ulcerative colitis, and 305 controls. The relative risk (RR) of Crohn's disease was inversely related to regular physical activity and estimated at 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4-0.9) and 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3-0.9) for weekly and daily exercise, respectively. Having psoriasis prior to the inflammatory bowel disease was associated with an increased relative risk of Crohn's disease (RR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9). Use of oral contraceptives was associated with an increased RR of 1.7 for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease confined to the colon and total ulcerative colitis at diagnosis were most strongly associated with oral contraceptives.     

Microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed as an outpatient procedure by minilaparotomy are less expensive and as safe as those performed as an inpatient procedure

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) plus low dose corticosteroids for induction of remission in generalized Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and to possibly identify predictive factors for the outcome under this therapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open label study, including 17 patients with not immediately life threatening, generalized WG. Treatment consisted of intravenous MTX 0.3 mg/kg once weekly plus daily oral low dose prednisone for initial diagnosis of WG in 11 and for a generalized relapse of WG in 6 patients. Interdisciplinary, standardized assessments of disease activity and extent were done 3-monthly. RESULTS: Within a median treatment period of 24.5 months remission could be achieved in 10/17 patients (59%), their median corticosteroid dose during that time was 1.75 mg/day. Seven patients with a median concomitant prednisone dose of 7.5 mg/day did not respond, among them 4 patients who were treated for a relapse of WG. Signs of de novo glomerulonephritis occurred in 5 of the 7 nonresponders. Significant side effects, including opportunistic infections, did not occur. CONCLUSION: Weekly low dose MTX in combination with low dose corticosteroids leads to an acceptable remission rate of almost 60% without significant side effects. Patients treated for a relapse of WG and patients with a need for a higher concomitant prednisone dose seem to be at risk for nonresponse, with a high likelihood of developing de novo glomerulonephritis.     

Growth suppression mediated by transfection of wild-type hMLH1 in human cancer cells expressing endogenous truncated hMLH1 protein

Eosinophils contribute to the inflammatory process in a variety of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Ketotifen is beneficial in experimental models of colitis and in patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of ketotifen therapy for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Children with newly or previously diagnosed ulcerative colitis with mild-moderate disease activity were treated with ketotifen at a dosage of 4 mg daily for eight weeks. Efficacy was determined by a physician disease severity index and by endoscopic and histologic examinations. Ten patients were enrolled. Symptoms improved in four patients and resolved completely in one patient. There was endoscopic improvement in three patients and histologic improvement in one. Increased eosinophils on rectal biopsy at entry were present in two of the responders. Five patients withdrew due to a lack of symptomatic improvement. No adverse events were identified. Low-dose ketotifen offers a limited therapeutic advantage in active ulcerative colitis that may be enhanced in the subgroup of patients with a high eosinophil count in the colonic mucosa. Further study of therapeutic efficacy with increased dosages of the mast cell stabilizer for acute and maintenance therapy is warranted.     

Effects of chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition on TNB-induced colitis in rats

Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis is increased in ulcerative colitis, but the role of NO in colitis is poorly understood. The present study employed Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, in rats to evaluate the effect of NO on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNB)-induced colitis. L-NAME solutions were placed in subcutaneous, osmotic mini-pumps which continuously released L-NAME at 0.042, 0.208, 0.417, or 1.667 mg kg-1 h-1. L-NAME dose-dependently enhanced lesions in TNB-induced colitis. The two higher doses of L-NAME significantly increased colonic mucosal damage, although there was slight, nonsignificant reduced lesion formation with the lowest dose of L-NAME. 0.042 mg kg-1 h-1. A single dose of L-NAME at 100 mg kg-1 subcutaneously injected daily in TNB-treated rats also increased lesions, and these ulcerogenic actions of L-NAME were reversed by L-arginine but not by D-arginine (both at 500 mg kg-1, s.c.). Only the highest dose of L-NAME (mini-pump) significantly depressed myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. Faecal occult bleeding showed a close relationship with severity of colitis. These findings suggest that there may exist a balance between NO protective and aggressive effects. In TNB-induced colitis, antagonism of endogenous NO generation was intensified, whereas slight inhibition of NO synthesis reduced lesions. Variations in responses, related to timing or dose changes in L-NAME, may reflect the differences in inducible vs constitutive NO synthase isoforms.     

Effects of local budesonide treatment on the cell-mediated immune response in acute and relapsing colitis in rats

Glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are effective in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but also have unwanted systemic side effects. Here, we describe the effects of budesonide and dexamethasone on acute experimental colitis and on T cells in thymus and spleen, as well as the effect of budesonide treatment on relapsing colitis. Acute colitis was induced by intracolonic administration of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) in ethanol, and a relapse was induced by an intraperitoneal booster of TNBS. GCS were administered intrarectally on days 1, 4, and 6 after induction of acute colitis or a relapse. Inflammatory cells in the colon were studied on day 7, and in acute colitis also on days 13 and 16. Budesonide treatment in acute and relapsing colitis resulted in reduction of macroscopic damage and decreased the numbers of macrophages and neutrophils in the colon. Dexamethasone was less effective. Dexamethasone, but not budesonide, reduced the number of T cells in the thymus. It is concluded that local budesonide is more effective in treatment of acute experimental colitis than dexamethasone and, in contrast to dexamethasone, did not cause a general suppression of T cells. Although budesonide was very effective in the treatment of relapsing colitis, this effect was not accomplished by affecting the number of T cells in the colon.     

Intravenous pulse administration of cyclophosphamide versus daily oral treatment in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and renal involvement: a prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVE: There is growing concern about the toxic side effects of daily oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) treatment. Intravenous (i.v.) pulse administration of CYC has been shown to be effective in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, but contradictory results have been reported in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. METHODS: The efficacy and toxicity of i.v. pulse administration of CYC (0.75 gm/m2) versus daily oral CYC treatment (2 mg/kg body weight) were investigated in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and renal involvement. RESULTS: The cumulative CYC dose was reduced by 57% in patients with i.v. pulse treatment (n = 22) compared with patients treated with daily oral therapy (n = 25). Patient survival, remission rate, time of remission, relapse rate, and outcome of renal function were not different between the 2 treatment groups. However, the rate of leukopenia (P < 0.01) and severe infections (P < 0.05 by 1-tailed test) was significantly reduced in the i.v. pulse group compared with the group receiving daily oral treatment. Moreover, gonadal toxicity was reduced in the i.v. pulse group, as indicated by significantly lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone. CONCLUSION: This randomized study shows that i.v. CYC administration is an effective therapeutic tool with low toxicity in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and renal involvement.     

A double-blind comparison of oral versus rectal mesalamine versus combination therapy in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mesalamine rectal suspension enema (Rowasa) alone, oral mesalamine tablets (Asacol) alone, and the combination of mesalamine enema and mesalamine tablets in patients with active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Sixty outpatients with ulcerative colitis at least 5 cm above the anal verge and not more than 50 cm, inclusive, and a total disease activity index (DAI) score between 4 and 10, inclusive, were randomized to either mesalamine rectal enema (n = 18) once nightly, oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day (n = 22), or a combination of both treatments (n = 20). Placebo capsules and enemas were used to maintain a blind procedure. Total DAI scores and abbreviated DAI scores were evaluated at wk 3 and 6, and wk 1 and 2, respectively. Patients recorded the amount of blood in stools, urgency, straining at stools, and abdominal pain in daily diaries. Physicians and patients rated overall improvement at each visit. RESULTS: At wk 6, combination therapy produced a greater improvement (-5.2) in total DAI scores than did either mesalamine enema (-4.4) or mesalamine tablet (-3.9) therapy alone; similar treatment differences were observed at wk 3. Compared with patients given mesalamine enemas or mesalamine tablets, combination-therapy patients reported an absence of blood in stools significantly sooner and, at all visits, the combination therapy group had the highest percentage of patients who reported no blood in their stools. Physicians' and patients' ratings of improvement indicated that combination therapy significantly improved disease status, compared with mesalamine tablet therapy alone. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral and rectal mesalamine therapy was well tolerated and produced earlier and more complete relief of rectal bleeding than oral or rectal therapy alone.