Need for the doctor of psychology degree in professional psychology.

The Vail Conference on professional training in psychology recommended development of explicitly professional programs and use of the PsyD degree to certify competence in professional psychology. Policies governing use of the degree, however, as well as the concepts of professional function which degree titles should symbolize, continue to be controversial. Opponents of the Vail Conference recommendations have argued that professional psychologists are most appropriately regarded as scholar-professionals, and have urged award of the PhD degree upon completion of graduate training in such fields as clinical psychology. As counterargument, a multiple definition of the term scholar-professional is stated, and the surplus meanings implied by scholarship are shown to be either false, misleading, or redundant. The difficulties that arise from using the PhD degree as a credential of professional competence are then discussed, and the advantages of employing the PsyD degree both affirmatively, as a certificate of professional competence in psychology, and restrictively, to exclude inadequately trained people from the practice of professional psychology, are asserted. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Selected outcomes of accredited programs.

For a representative sample of 149 accredited doctoral programs, 3 types of outcomes are reported: activities of students, time to degree, and employment settings of graduates. Comparisons of activities on the basis of program specialty area yielded a difference only for the activity of providing professional services (with clinical?>?counseling?>?school). Comparisons on the basis of degree type (PhD, PsyD) yielded differences for all activities except providing professional services, with PhD students and faculty reporting higher median levels of involvement. Students in PhD programs require significantly longer (approximately 1.5 years) to complete their degrees than do PsyD program students. Graduates' employment settings tend to be consistent with the specialty area of their doctoral programs with interesting shifts from initial to subsequent employment. Recommendations are made for expanding outcome assessment of graduate education and training in professional psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Survey of current clinical and research trends in clinical psychology.

Surveyed directors of 115 clinical PhD and PsyD psychology programs with accreditation from the American Psychological Association to explore trends in the training of clinical psychologists. The most popular area of clinical research appeared to be behavioral medicine/health psychology. The most popular specialty clinics allowing training in a specific domain of clinical psychology were family therapy, behavioral medicine, neuropsychology/rehabilitation, and couples therapy. Ss in PhD programs were more likely than those in PsyD programs to subscribe to a cognitive-behavioral/social-learning orientation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Doctoral candidates' attitudes toward models of professional training.

Administered a questionnaire to 226 clinical graduate students from scientist-professional programs (SPP) and 223 graduate students from professional school programs (PSP) to assess attitudes toward their current training program's curriculum. Findings show that 85% of PSP and 70% of SPP Ss expressed positive attitudes. When divided into those aspiring to applied practice, research, and combined applied/research careers, 67% of SPP Ss who aspired to applied practice careers (28% of this sample) expressed preference for a professional school training model. In contrast, two-thirds or more of PSP Ss in all career-aspiration categories expressed a preference to remain in their existing programs. Findings were consistent across age, sex, entry degree, and internship experience. Results are discussed in relation to Vail Conference recommendations and forces that shape psychology graduate curricula. (21 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An examination of Doctor of Psychology interns.

Questionnaire data from 9 clinical interns who were candidates for the Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) degree showed that Ss (1) viewed their clinical skills and training as superior to those of clinicians' receiving the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree; (2) had received training similar to that of PhD candidates in the areas of psychotherapy, psychological evaluation, and psychodiagnostic assessment; (3) had adequately developed their research and writing skills; and (4) had not experienced difficulty in receiving placements. Findings support the value of the PsyD degree, although problems regarding its professional acceptance are noted. (10 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The PsyD: Heterogeneity in Practitioner Training.

The paucity of research on PsyD programs has led to unsubstantiated generalizations and uniformity myths about practitioner training. The authors collected information on the admission rates, financial assistance, theoretical orientations, and selected characteristics of American Psychological Association (APA)-accredited PsyD programs in clinical psychology (89% response rate). Systematic comparisons were made between PsyD programs housed in university departments, university professional schools, and freestanding institutions to describe the differences and commonalities among the heterogeneous PsyD programs. Empirical comparisons were provided among APA-accredited PsyD, practice-oriented PhD, and research-oriented PhD programs in clinical psychology to highlight the distinctive features of PsyD programs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Professional interests and career aspirations of graduate students in professional psychology: An exploratory survey.

Graduate students in American professional psychology programs (N = 498) were surveyed to examine differences between specialty area (clinical vs. counseling), degree type (PhD vs. PsyD), and gender with respect to demographics, training models, theoretical orientations, career aspirations and reasons for choices, research productivity, and expected salaries. Clinical and counseling students differed with respect to training models, theoretical orientations, career aspirations, and expected salaries, whereas PhD and PsyD students differed with respect to training models, theoretical orientations, career aspirations, and research emphasis. The changing gender composition in professional psychology is unlikely to have a dramatic effect given their professional similarities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Getting in and getting money: A comparative analysis of admission standards, acceptance rates, and financial assistance across the research–practice continuum in clinical psychology programs.

The diversification and proliferation of doctoral programs in clinical psychology call for their periodic comparative analysis to inform prospective applicants, their advisors, and the entire field. The authors surveyed directors of the 232 American Psychological Association (APA)–accredited doctoral programs in clinical psychology (98% response) regarding application numbers, acceptance rates, financial assistance, and credentials of incoming students. Results are summarized for all clinical programs and then separately for 6 types of programs along the practice–research continuum: freestanding PsyD, university professional school PsyD, university department PsyD, practice-oriented PhD, equal-emphasis PhD, and research-oriented PhD. Lower acceptance rates and higher Graduate Record Examination scores were strongly associated with programs oriented toward more research training; for example, research-oriented PhD programs admitted far fewer applicants (7% vs. 50%) than did freestanding PsyD programs. Freestanding PsyD programs awarded significantly less full financial assistance to incoming students (1% vs. 89%) and required 1 less year to complete than did PhD programs. Overall, PhD-level students were more likely to secure an APA or Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers internship than were PsyD students. The authors conclude with observations about the historical changes and heightened differentiation of doctoral training in clinical psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Ethical discrimination ability of intern psychologists: A function of training in ethics.

Predicted that psychology interns who had completed a formal course in ethics would be able to discriminate the ethical problems or considerations in clinical practice at a rate significantly higher than interns who had received no formal training in ethics. Ss were 234 interns in clinical and counseling psychology programs. Results suggest that Ss who have completed formal training in ethics score significantly higher on the Ethical Discrimination Inventory than Ss who have received no formal training in ethics. Results appear to support the efficacy of teaching professional ethics in graduate training programs. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Admission requirements, acceptance rates, and financial assistance in clinical psychology programs: Diversity across the practice-research continuum.

129 directors (80% response) of APA-accredited clinical psychology programs provided information pertaining to admission requirements, acceptance rates, financial assistance, and theoretical orientations. Summary data are presented and comparisons are made among 4 types of clinical programs: PsyD programs, practice-oriented PhD programs, equal-emphasis PhD programs, and research-oriented PhD programs. Clinical doctoral programs held similar expectations for undergraduate preparation in psychology, but robust differences emerged on preferred Graduate Record Examination scores, acceptance rates, and financial assistance. In the most extreme comparison (PsyD vs research-oriented PhD programs), students were 4 times more likely to gain acceptance but 6 times less likely to receive full financial assistance in PsyD programs. Implications of these results for potential graduate students and for the future of applied psychology programs are briefly discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A PsyD degrees for every practitioner: Truth in labeling.

At present, nearly 70% of American Psychological Association members are identified as health care providers. The PhD degree, a generic scholarly degree, is most commonly used to certify completion of doctoral studies in professional psychology. As a result, the consumer has difficulty determining which psychologist is qualified to provide health care. The Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) should identify those psychologists who provide doctoral-level health services. Licensed, qualified PhD psychologists could be awarded the PsyD retroactively on the basis of a credential review, as the JD degree was awarded to lawyers previously holding the LLB. Applicants for the PsyD would not relinquish their PhD degrees. Upon review and approval, they would identify themselves with both degrees: PsyD, PhD. Mechanisms for accomplishing the change are suggested. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The questionable value of a master's degree for a PhD-pursuing student.

Results of a survey of 153 institutions with graduate programs in psychology indicates the majority of schools with PhD programs do not offer a separate master's degree. Few colleges, and none of the top-ranking universities, expressed great interest in PhD applicants with master's degrees from other institutions. Most respondents stated these transfer students would be credited with a limited amount of course work or treated as if they had a BA degree. It is concluded that the master's degree may slow the progress of students seriously considering a PhD in psychology, and may actually be a limiting factor for acceptance in doctoral programs, particularly in prestigious schools. Universities should deemphasize the master's degree as part of doctoral training and provide terminal master's programs which prepare students for immediate professional or subprofessional employment. (19 ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Substance abuse training in APA-accredited doctoral programs in clinical psychology: A survey.

A survey addressing training provided in the area of substance abuse was mailed to all 160 doctoral clinical psychology programs provisionally and fully accredited by the American Psychological Association (APA). A total of 95 replies were received (59%). This study was conducted to ascertain whether levels of doctoral training in this area have changed appreciably since comparable surveys by J. A. Selin and S. Svanum (1981) and B. Lubin et al (1986). Because of the considerable increase in number of APA-accredited PsyD programs since the previous 2 surveys, it was also possible to compare relative levels of training in substance abuse in PhD, PsyD, and combined PhD/PsyD programs. Survey results did not suggest that substance abuse training either has changed markedly over time or differs substantially across types of degree programs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

On reasoning from predicates: The PhD is not a professional degree.

Counters E. J. Shoben's (see record 1981-26598-001) arguments in favor of retaining the PhD degree as the most appropriate credential for professional practice. It is argued that (1) the ability to think critically and to write in a scholarly manner can be demonstrated by other means than the writing of a dissertation and the awarding of a PhD (accreditation standards and licensing regulations require a doctorate not a PhD); (2) although most faculty in professional schools and practitioners have a PhD, this reflects the fact that until recently no PsyD degrees were awarded; (3) psychology is solidly established enough as a profession to win acceptance of a separate professional degree; and (4) methods are proposed for preventing the PsyD from being perceived, incorrectly, as a watered down degree. (4 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Training for independent practice: A survey of graduate programs in clinical psychology.

Administered a questionnaire to 112 directors of clinical training programs to investigate the types of training opportunities relative to independent practice that doctoral programs in clinical psychology are offering students. Findings indicate that 87% of PsyD programs and 35% of PhD programs offered some training. Results indicate that private practice as a professional activity for psychologists has become more accepted, that increased training is being offered, but that negative attitudes toward private practice still remain in a small sector of academia. (4 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Evaluative comparison of PsyD and PhD students by clinical internship supervisors.

Internship supervisors evaluated the preinternship preparation of 67 PsyD students and 228 PhD students in regard to several core clinical skills and general dimensions of professional competence. In contrast with previous studies that suggested serious dissatisfaction among supervisors with the general quality of preinternship training, most interns evaluated individually in this study were considered at least adequately prepared for most kinds of clinical work. Except for slight superiority of PsyD students in "sensitivity" and of PhD students in "scientific attitude," there were no reliable differences between interns from practitioner programs and those from scientist-practitioner programs. For future evaluation research, the need to move beyond ratings to performance-based measures of competence is imperative. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Teaching of controversial and empirically validated treatments in APA-accredited clinical and counseling psychology programs.

Surveyed the directors of 126 American Psychological Association (APA) accredited clinical and counseling psychology PhD and PsyD programs to determine whether they teach controversial memory recovery techniques for suspected childhood sexual abuse and the controversial technique, facilitated communication. The authors also asked about training in empirically validated treatments. Results show that counseling psychology programs were more likely than clinical psychology programs to teach memory recovery techniques, and counseling programs were less likely to discourage the use of both memory recovery techniques and facilitated communication. More emphasis on research, less on practice, and a higher percentage of behaviorally-oriented faculty was related to less training of controversial techniques. Empirically validated treatments were reportedly taught more in clinical than in counseling psychology programs and in programs that emphasize research and have a higher percentage of behaviorally-oriented faculty. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Doctor of Psychology degree: From hibernation to reality.

Since the beginning of the American Psychological Association (APA), there have been 3 explicit models of psychologists: scientist, scientist–professional, and professional. In the late 1940's, there was a need for a model of clinical training that the Boulder scientist-professional model fulfilled. However, the emphasis on training in the science of psychology seemed to increase at the expense of training in the applied aspects of psychology. The need was increasingly voiced for a service-oriented training program with a clear professional identity. These pressures culminated in the most recent training conference convened by APA at Vail, Colorado in 1973. The Vail conferees asserted that the development of psychological science had sufficiently matured to justify creation of explicit professional programs. The Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) model and rationale are explained, and essential ingredients of currently operating PsyD programs are discussed. Future developments in professional programs, credentialing and designation, and the critical interface with societal needs are also examined. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Supplement to listing of APA-accredited doctoral and predoctoral internship training programs in psychology": Clarification.

Reports an error in the American Psychologist, 1994[Jul], Vol 49[7], 671. The supplement noted the phasing out of the accredited program in clinical psychology at Yeshiva University. However, this notice referred only to Yeshiva's clinical PhD program, not to its clinical PsyD program. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1994-42940-001.) Reports the changes announced by the American Psychological Association (APA) Committee on Accreditation in the list of APA-accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology and predoctoral internships for doctoral training in psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)