Altered patterns of DNA methylation on chromosomes from leukemia cell lines: identification of 5-methylcytosines by indirect immunodetection

The feasibility of implant treatment in patients after oral ablative tumor surgery has not yet been investigated with consideration of the requisite high periodontal standards. A report on this topic has to deal not only with implant survival but also with implant health, bone response, soft tissue health, failure pattern, time of failure, and ease of restoration. For the assessment of an implant system, an overview must be accomplished that takes into account the different restorations used and their interaction with the implant system that was used. This study presents the Bone-Lock implant system (Howmedica Leibinger GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) in a retrospective investigation after 5 years of follow-up with special emphasis on the prosthetic restorations used following resection of oral malignancies. From early in 1990 through June 1996, we inserted 210 dental endosteal Bone-Lock implants (58 patients) after oral tumor resectioning. Included in the study were 45 patients with 162 implants and prosthetic restorations that had been loaded for 1 year (dentures retained by telescopic or bar-clip or ball attachments, implant-supported prostheses, tooth-to-implant connected bridges). Regular follow-up consisted of evaluation of the Plaque Index (Silness and L?e) and of the Sulcus Bleeding Index (L?e), measurements of pocket probing depth, implant mobility (by means of the Periotest method), bone resorption (according to X-ray findings), and a questionnaire that registered patient satisfaction. The results were evaluated for each restoration and were compared with baseline standards. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.2%. For implants that had been in place for over 365 days, the survival rate was 93%. The investigation showed that after resection of oral malignancies, patients could be treated with dental implants and superstructures with long-term efficacy similar to that found in healthy subjects considering internationally accepted standards. Implant treatment in tumor patients appeared to offer the most positive periodontic results when use of bar-clip or telescope-retained overdentures was involved. The patient satisfaction level with the described prosthodontic treatment was satisfactory.     

Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty

Recent developments in dual xray absorptiometry have made it possible to quantify bone mineral density changes adjacent to total hip arthroplasty. Even small changes in local bone mass that are not visible with conventional radiographs can be detected using dual xray absorptiometry. Commonly there is a loss of 10% to 45% of the periprosthetic bone mass during the first years after total hip arthroplasty. Recent studies have suggested that this bone loss is not necessarily progressive and some degree of restoration of bone density around implants may occur. Current data suggest that there is active bone remodeling in the proximal femur in response to prosthetic implantation. Such response differs between different stem designs and type of fixation.     

Practical implant dentistry--the mandibular removable overdenture prosthesis

The fully edentulous mandible presents functional, esthetic, and psychological challenges for the patient and the dentist. The mandibular overdenture supported by endosseous implants can provide a superior treatment modality, overcoming many of the difficulties inherent in the conventional denture. Advantages cited are increased denture retention, improved chewing efficiency, maintenance of bone height, replacement of lost anatomy, increased denture stability, reduction of soft tissue coverage and extension of the prosthesis, and easy access for hygiene maintenance. The major disadvantage rests with the patient's intolerance of a removable prosthetic design.     

Clinical case report: an improved technique for using dental implants as orthodontic anchorage

The use of endosseous implants as intra-oral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic treatment has been reported in the literature for some years, first in rabbits and dogs, and then in adult human patients. The implants were generally used solely for the purpose of anchorage. This paper reports the successful application of orthodontic forces utilizing dental implants to achieve tooth movement. The implants were subsequently used as fixtures in a pre-determined plan to support a fixed prosthesis. A clinical example demonstrates how implants may serve dual roles, for anchorage and then for fixed prosthetic support. The principles involved in using dental implants as part of a multi-disciplinary approach to dental treatment are illustrated.     

Menopause: a new era

The Endopore implant provides a novel method for reliable fixation of endosseous dental implants within the bone. Through the use of a porous-surfaced zone formed by sintering Ti alloy particles of the appropriate size and under appropriate processing conditions to a sold Ti alloy core of desired shape (tapered truncated cone), an implant is now available that can be placed using a relatively simple surgical procedure using either surgical burs or hand osteotomes. Of even greater value is the suitability of this implant design for treatment of cases that because of minimal bone height cannot be treated routinely using other currently-available implants. The high success rates experienced with significantly shorter implant lengths compared with other designs indicate the appropriateness of this system for difficult-to-treat cases. The Endopore system represents the next generation of endosseous dental implants characterized by uncomplicated and reliable treatment for a wider range of dentally-compromised patients. Its history is founded on extensive and fully-documented research at the human preclinical stage as well as human use experiences. The results during the past nine years have confirmed the high expectations that those early studies suggested.     

Clinical assessment of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson''s disease

The possibility of placing endosseous implants in the edentulous maxilla is frequently reduced by inadequate bone volume of the residual ridge. In totally edentulous maxillae with knife-edge conformation, insufficient thickness is frequently associated with insufficient height of the residual ridge in the posterior maxilla because of pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses. This surgical method combines grafting of the maxillary sinuses, onlay grafts on the buccal side of maxillary posterior segments, and sagittal osteotomy of the anterior maxilla with interpositional bone grafts. Five to six months after maxillary reconstruction, Br?nemark implants were placed and, after osseointegration occurred, implant-supported dental prostheses were fabricated. Three patients have been treated with this method and 22 implants have been placed. The mean follow-up after final prosthetic rehabilitation has been 16 months; survival rate has been 100%. Despite the small number of patients and the short follow-up, preliminary results have shown very promising results.     

Implant reconstruction of the jaws and craniofacial skeleton

Full oral rehabilitation with a high degree of success is now possible with osseointegrated implants. Osseointegration is a direct connection between living bone and the titanium implant at the level of the light microscope. Osseointegrated implants are currently used to replace single teeth, support fixed bridges and stabilize full dentures. These implants can also be placed extraorally for attachment of facial prosthesis. The surgical technique used to place implants intraorally into jaws or facial skeleton is performed in two stages using a local anesthetic and/or conscious sedation. During stage I surgery, holes are placed into the jaw using a series of gradually larger diameter burs until the desired diameter and depth of the bony preparation is achieved. The implant is then placed. The implant must remain undisturbed for 4 months for osseointegration to take place. Stage II surgery is then required to remove the mucosa over the implant and place the transmucosal abutment. After 1-2 weeks of healing, the restorative dentist can take an impression and fabricate the prosthesis. On occasion, it is necessary to augment the height and width of the atrophic jaw with autogenous or allogeneic bone grafts prior to implant placement. Bone grafts are sometimes placed on the floor of the nose or the floor of the maxillary sinus. Guided tissue regeneration is a technique used to generate bone within bony defects adjacent to implants. With long-term rates of success (5 years) of 99% for implants placed in the mandible and 95% for those placed in the maxilla, reconstruction of the jaws and cranial facial skeleton with osseointegrated implants has become the treatment of choice.     

Hemangiopericytoma: a 20-year single-institution experience

In this overview, which is based on selected books and reviews, the microscopic appearances of prosthesis-bone interfaces resulting from clinically relevant implantation techniques are highlighted. The following techniques are distinguished to insert and attach prostheses in the recipient bone: impaction into bone, primary mechanical interlocking, cement fixation, bone ongrowth and secondary mechanical interlocking with bioinert materials, and enhanced bone ongrowth and bone bonding to bioactive materials. The resulting typical histomorphologies of orthopedic and dental prostheses-bone interfaces are described and illustrated from the author's studies employing light, fluorescence, and backscattered electron microscopy, and corresponding microradiographs of undecalcified ground sections of bone and implants. Special emphasis is given to the mineralization-demineralization kinetics of the interfacial bone matrix interacting with specific surface reactions of some implant materials. Consequently, the distinction between bioinert and bioactive prosthetic materials is critically analyzed.     

Delayed implants in the anterior maxilla with the IMZ-implant system: a radiographical evaluation

One hundred and seventy-three IMZ-implants in 81 patients, placed in the anterior region of the maxilla, were evaluated radiographically by two observers. Radiographs were evaluated at three intervals, namely at the time of implant placement, the time of prosthetic restoration and at the latest available radiograph, on average 2 1/2 years after implant placement. In this study marginal bone height and the type of radiolucency adjacent to the implant were determined. Both observers were able to classify the marginal bone height (mesial and distal) and the distinctive type of resorptive defects to an acceptable level of agreement, with Cohen's kappa ranging between 0.48 and 0.69. It was found that, at the most recent visit to the clinic, angular-shaped resorptive defects are found mesially and/or distally of the implants at approximately 25% of the implants. At this stage 20.7% of the mesial implant sites and 27.9% of the distal implant sites show marginal bone heights less than three-quarters of the implant length. These findings do not fully underscore and sometimes even contradict the clinical observations which were considered highly satisfactory.     

Implants and orthodontics

After a detailed historical review of implantology applied to orthodontics, and an analysis of experimental studies on orthodontic implants, the authors assess the interest of implant clinical uses as anchorage for orthodontic movement, prosthetic supports in agenetic cases or retention devices after orthodontic therapy. Different specifications and requirements are also given for a multidisciplinary approach of treatment plants.     

Orbito-palpebral prosthesis retained by intraosseous implants]

The use of intraosseous implants, whose tolerance is continually improving, constitutes an important progress in the field of prosthetic rehabilitation. In particular, titanium implants largely resolve the problem of retention of craniofacial prostheses. Our experience, based on that of Swedish authors concerning the extra-oral use of intraosseous implants, was sufficiently convincing to adopt this effective technique in our patients candidates for prosthetic rehabilitation. The case of a patient rehabilitated by means of an orbito-palpebral prosthesis is presented after a brief biomechanical review and presentation of the technique. Our results, although preliminary, are very encouraging in terms of the technical aspects as well as patient comfort. A further study could reinforce our decision.     

Treatment planning and surgical considerations for placement of wide-body implants

Partially edentulous implant treatment has evolved from using a standard diameter fixture for every tooth site to selection of the implant diameter according to the surgical demands, space available, and the dimension of the final prosthetic tooth. The advantages are functional, improved emergence profiles for esthetics, and optimal contours for oral hygiene maintenance. This article reviews presurgical treatment planning for wide-diameter implants.     

Implants in the partially edentulous patient: restorative considerations

Restorative considerations are critical to the long-term success of fixed implant-supported prostheses, especially in the posterior quadrants of the partially edentulous patient. The parafunctional habit of bruxism must be identified and addressed. The restoration should dictate implant placement. Control of forces directed upon the prosthesis and implants is critical to long-term success. Anatomic limitations to implant placement and surgical procedures to correct these deficiencies must be considered for their impact on the prosthetic restoration. Nonaxial forces or bending moments should be minimized by the use of an adequate number, position and alignment of implants; by control of the occlusion; and by design of the prosthesis. The patient must understand the risks, limitations, costs and time commitments of implant restorations prior to treatment.     

Endosseous implants for prosthetic rehabilitation in bone grafted alveolar clefts

The authors report their experience in the surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of three patients affected by sequelae of cleft lip and palate, with residual alveolar cleft and absence of maxillary anterior teeth. The patients were treated by means of late secondary bone grafting of the alveolar cleft, followed by the insertion of endosseous titanium plasma-sprayed implants (IMZ). After a further healing period (6-12 months) fixed dental prostheses were constructed. Preliminary results from this series have shown how dental prostheses supported by endosseous implants in grafted alveolar clefts are a very reliable possibility in dental rehabilitation of this malformation.     

Failure of oral implants: aetiology, symptoms and influencing factors

The use of oral implants opened a wide range of prosthetic treatment possibilities in edentulous patients. Although the reported success rates of oral implants are high, failures do occur. This paper reviews the current knowledge about the aetiology, the signs and symptoms and the possible influencing factors of implant failure. Possible causes of implant failure are thought to be infection of the periimplant tissues, occlusal overload, or a combination of both. Nevertheless, pinpointing one of these as the aetiological factor in a particular case is difficult and should be handled reluctantly. Although the cause might seem obvious, influencing factors could play a role as well. Gaining insight into these processes might stimulate the adoption of preventive action and therefore increase the predictability of the treatment outcome with oral implants.     

Esthetic and prosthetic procedures in single-tooth replacement

Loss of anterior maxillary teeth always results in bone resorption and loss of interdental papillae, and the resorption makes a single tooth replacement by a dental implant very difficult. When infections have been present and the patient's history shows previous surgery at the apex of the root, bone destruction is substantial, which results in an increased resorption defect, thereby further increasing the aesthetic and prosthetic problems. This paper describes the steps necessary for implant surgery and the prosthetics; a brief summary is provided. The quality and quantity of bone, along with the space available between the adjacent teeth, are the basic factors in treatment planning and determine the type of implant to be used. Some resorption and bone defects are usually present after a tooth extraction, and bone regeneration procedures can be performed either before or simultaneously with the implant placement, with numerous flap designs available. Soft tissue augmentation can be achieved by taking a connective tissue graft from the palatal side. Antirotational devices (eg, hex lock abutments) are necessary for all implants in single tooth replacement. Screw-retained abutments can be used in posterior areas and in angled positions in facial areas as well. With proper single tooth implant position, cementation of laboratory fabricated crowns can be considered.     

The dark side of dioxygen biochemistry

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical function and long-term prognosis of overdentures retained by a small number of implants in the maxilla and mandible using one of two different attachment systems. Included in the study were all patients referred to specialty clinics in J?nk?ping and Link?ping, Sweden, during the treatment period who needed an overdenture and could be provided with a minimum number of two bilaterally-placed implants. Excluded were patients with bone-grafted jaws, irradiated cancer patients, heavy bruxers, and patients who had lost a fixed prosthesis because of implant losses. The patients were randomly assigned to receive one retentive system, either a round 2-mm-diameter bar with clips or ball attachments (Nobel Biocare). Eighteen overdentures were placed in maxillae and 32 in mandibles, supported by a total of 115 Br?nemark implants. Of the implants placed, 86.1% were continuously osseointegrated. The cumulative implant survival rates after 7 years of loading were 75.4% in the maxillae and 100% in the mandibles. There was no difference in implant survival rate between the attachment systems. Patients with implant losses were characterized by severely resorbed maxillary ridges and inferior bone quality, together with unfavorable loading circumstances such as short implants combined with long leverages. Complications and prosthetic adjustments were mostly resolved early and easily.     

An interactive, parallel, three-dimensional fast Fourier transform convolution dose calculation using a supercomputer

After cancer treatment in the head and neck area, mastication and speech are often affected. Some of the problems encountered can be solved by adequate dental rehabilitation. However, dental rehabilitation is often compromised for various reasons. The change in anatomy due to surgery often results in lack of denture-bearing mucosa. The effects of radiotherapy on the salivary glands and the mucosa result in dry oral tissue and diminished retention of removable dentures. Osseointegrated oral implants can help to solve these problems. Although implant treatment for patients with cancer of the head and neck is covered by the Dutch national health insurance, and there is therefore no financial obstacle, implants have not, so far, been widely used with these patients. In order to establish the possible reasons for this, an analysis was performed. Retrospective data on 95 consecutive patients were collected from records. The indication for the use of oral osseointegrated implants was reviewed. Analysis of the data showed that 45% did not need specific prosthetic rehabilitation. An indication for the use of osseointegrated implants was found in 25% of the patients. For various reasons, only 3% actually received implants. In striving to completely rehabilitate a cancer patient, the possible use of osseointegrated oral implants should be evaluated before the initial oncological treatment begins. The insertion of implants during the initial surgical procedure should be considered more often, with a view to reducing the number of surgical procedures.     

Problems associated with the atrophic mandible

A range of treatment options has been presented regarding the use of dental implants to rehabilitate patients who otherwise have compromised function using conventional tissue-borne prostheses. This patient population offers significant challenges to both the surgeon and the prosthodontist. Generally speaking, IODs retained on two or more endosteal osseointegrated implants; transosteal, subperiosteal, ramus frame implant-supported and implant-retained prostheses, and a totally implant-supported design offer options to treat the severely atrophic mandible. When bone support or volume is so lacking that augmentation procedures are required, bone grafting can be considered as a treatment option. The state-of-the-art of implant treatment for the atrophic mandible offers to the dental professional and patient a variety of options. Thus far, it is too early to make specific recommendations as to which treatment offers the best option for each patient. It is fair to say that the ISP remains the gold standard against which other treatments can be compared.