Economic model predictive control with time‐varying objective function for nonlinear process systems

Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a control scheme that combines real‐time dynamic economic process optimization with the feedback properties of model predictive control (MPC) by replacing the quadratic cost function with a general economic cost function. Almost all the recent work on EMPC involves cost functions that are time invariant (do not explicitly account for time‐varying process economics). In the present work, we focus on the development of a Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) scheme that is formulated with an explicitly time‐varying economic cost function. First, the formulation of the proposed two‐mode LEMPC is given. Second, closed‐loop stability is proven through a theoretical treatment. Last, we demonstrate through extensive closed‐loop simulations of a chemical process that the proposed LEMPC can achieve stability with time‐varying economic cost as well as improve economic performance of the process over a conventional MPC scheme. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 507–519, 2014     

Distributed model predictive control of switched nonlinear systems with scheduled mode transitions

A method for the design of distributed model predictive control (DMPC) systems for a class of switched nonlinear systems for which the mode transitions take place according to a prescribed switching schedule is presented. Under appropriate stabilizability assumptions on the existence of a set of feedback controllers that can stabilize the closed‐loop switched, nonlinear system, a cooperative DMPC architecture using Lyapunov‐based model predictive control (MPC) in which the distributed controllers carry out their calculations in parallel and communicate in an iterative fashion to compute their control actions is designed. The proposed DMPC design is applied to a nonlinear chemical process network with scheduled mode transitions and its performance and computational efficiency properties in comparison to a centralized MPC architecture are evaluated through simulations. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59:860‐871, 2013     

Economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems using empirical models

Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a feedback control technique that attempts to tightly integrate economic optimization and feedback control since it is a predictive control scheme that is formulated with an objective function representing the process economics. As its name implies, EMPC requires the availability of a dynamic model to compute its control actions and such a model may be obtained either through application of first principles or through system identification techniques. In industrial practice, it may be difficult in general to obtain an accurate first‐principles model of the process. Motivated by this, in the present work, Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) is designed with a linear empirical model that allows for closed‐loop stability guarantees in the context of nonlinear chemical processes. Specifically, when the linear model provides a sufficient degree of accuracy in the region where time varying economically optimal operation is considered, conditions for closed‐loop stability under the LEMPC scheme based on the empirical model are derived. The LEMPC scheme is applied to a chemical process example to demonstrate its closed‐loop stability and performance properties as well as significant computational advantages. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 816–830, 2015     

On identification of well‐conditioned nonlinear systems: Application to economic model predictive control of nonlinear processes

The focus of this work is on economic model predictive control (EMPC) that utilizes well‐conditioned polynomial nonlinear state‐space (PNLSS) models for processes with nonlinear dynamics. Specifically, the article initially addresses the development of a nonlinear system identification technique for a broad class of nonlinear processes which leads to the construction of PNLSS dynamic models which are well‐conditioned over a broad region of process operation in the sense that they can be correctly integrated in real‐time using explicit numerical integration methods via time steps that are significantly larger than the ones required by nonlinear state‐space models identified via existing techniques. Working within the framework of PNLSS models, additional constraints are imposed in the identification procedure to ensure well‐conditioning of the identified nonlinear dynamic models. This development is key because it enables the design of Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) systems for nonlinear processes using the well‐conditioned nonlinear models that can be readily implemented in real‐time as the computational burden required to compute the control actions within the process sampling period is reduced. A stability analysis for this LEMPC design is provided that guarantees closed‐loop stability of a process under certain conditions when an LEMPC based on a nonlinear empirical model is used. Finally, a classical chemical reactor example demonstrates both the system identification and LEMPC design techniques, and the significant advantages in terms of computation time reduction in LEMPC calculations when using the nonlinear empirical model. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 3353–3373, 2015     

Smart manufacturing: Handling preventive actuator maintenance and economics using model predictive control

Integrating components and systems of the manufacturing process is an important area of research to enable the future development and deployment of the Smart Manufacturing paradigm. An economic model predictive control (EMPC) scheme is proposed that effectively integrates scheduled preventive control actuator maintenance, process economics, and process control into a unified methodology. To accomplish this goal, a Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) scheme is formulated for handling changing number of online actuators (i.e., changing number of manipulated inputs). Closed‐loop stability under the proposed LEMPC is proven. Subsequently, the LEMPC is applied to a chemical process network used for benzene alkylation to demonstrate that the LEMPC can maintain stability and improve dynamic economic performance of the process network in the presence of changing number of available control actuators resulting from scheduled preventive maintenance tasks. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 2179–2196, 2014     

Machine learning-based distributed model predictive control of nonlinear processes

This work explores the design of distributed model predictive control (DMPC) systems for nonlinear processes using machine learning models to predict nonlinear dynamic behavior. Specifically, sequential and iterative DMPC systems are designed and analyzed with respect to closed-loop stability and performance properties. Extensive open-loop data within a desired operating region are used to develop long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network models with a sufficiently small modeling error from the actual nonlinear process model. Subsequently, these LSTM models are utilized in Lyapunov-based DMPC to achieve efficient real-time computation time while ensuring closed-loop state boundedness and convergence to the origin. Using a nonlinear chemical process network example, the simulation results demonstrate the improved computational efficiency when the process is operated under sequential and iterative DMPCs while the closed-loop performance is very close to the one of a centralized MPC system.     

Actuator stiction compensation via model predictive control for nonlinear processes

The problem of valve stiction is addressed, which is a nonlinear friction phenomenon that causes poor performance of control loops in the process industries. A model predictive control (MPC) stiction compensation formulation is developed including detailed dynamics for a sticky valve and additional constraints on the input rate of change and actuation magnitude to reduce control loop performance degradation and to prevent the MPC from requesting physically unrealistic control actions due to stiction. Although developed with a focus on stiction, the MPC‐based compensation method presented is general and has potential to compensate for other nonlinear valve dynamics which have some similarities to those caused by stiction. Feasibility and closed‐loop stability of the proposed MPC formulation are proven for a sufficiently small sampling period when Lyapunov‐based constraints are incorporated. Using a chemical process example with an economic model predictive controller (EMPC), the selection of appropriate constraints for the proposed method is demonstrated. The example verified the incorporation of the stiction dynamics and actuation magnitude constraints in the EMPC causes it to select set‐points that the valve output can reach and causes the operating constraints to be met. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 2004–2023, 2016     

Economic model predictive control of nonlinear time‐delay systems: Closed‐loop stability and delay compensation

Closed‐loop stability of nonlinear time‐delay systems under Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) is considered. LEMPC is initially formulated with an ordinary differential equation model and is designed on the basis of an explicit stabilizing control law. To address closed‐loop stability under LEMPC, first, we consider the stability properties of the sampled‐data system resulting from the nonlinear continuous‐time delay system with state and input delay under a sample‐and‐hold implementation of the explicit controller. The steady‐state of this sampled‐data closed‐loop system is shown to be practically stable. Second, conditions such that closed‐loop stability, in the sense of boundedness of the closed‐loop state, under LEMPC are derived. A chemical process example is used to demonstrate that indeed closed‐loop stability is maintained under LEMPC for sufficiently small time‐delays. To cope with performance degradation owing to the effect of input delay, a predictor feedback LEMPC methodology is also proposed. The predictor feedback LEMPC design employs a predictor to compute a prediction of the state after the input delay period and an LEMPC scheme that is formulated with a differential difference equation (DDE) model, which describes the time‐delay system, initialized with the predicted state. The predictor feedback LEMPC is also applied to the chemical process example and yields improved closed‐loop stability and economic performance properties. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 4152–4165, 2015     

Error‐triggered on‐line model identification for model‐based feedback control

In industry, it may be difficult in many applications to obtain a first‐principles model of the process, in which case a linear empirical model constructed using process data may be used in the design of a feedback controller. However, linear empirical models may not capture the nonlinear dynamics over a wide region of state‐space and may also perform poorly when significant plant variations and disturbances occur. In the present work, an error‐triggered on‐line model identification approach is introduced for closed‐loop systems under model‐based feedback control strategies. The linear models are re‐identified on‐line when significant prediction errors occur. A moving horizon error detector is used to quantify the model accuracy and to trigger the model re‐identification on‐line when necessary. The proposed approach is demonstrated through two chemical process examples using a model‐based feedback control strategy termed Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC). The chemical process examples illustrate that the proposed error‐triggered on‐line model identification strategy can be used to obtain more accurate state predictions to improve process economics while maintaining closed‐loop stability of the process under LEMPC. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 949–966, 2017     

An economic model predictive control approach to integrated production management and process operation

Managing production schedules and tracking time‐varying demand of certain products while optimizing process economics are subjects of central importance in industrial applications. We investigate the use of economic model predictive control (EMPC) in tracking a production schedule. Specifically, given that only a small subset of the total process state vector is typically required to track certain scheduled values, we design a novel EMPC scheme, through proper construction of the objective function and constraints, that forces specific process states to meet the production schedule and varies the rest of the process states in a way that optimizes process economic performance. Conditions under which feasibility and closed‐loop stability of a nonlinear process under such an EMPC for schedule management can be guaranteed are developed. The proposed EMPC scheme is demonstrated through a chemical process example in which the product concentration is requested to follow a certain production schedule. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 1892–1906, 2017     

A feedback control framework for safe and economically‐optimal operation of nonlinear processes

Maintaining safe operation of chemical processes and meeting environmental constraints are issues of paramount importance in the area of process systems and control engineering, and are ideally achieved while maximizing economic profit. It has long been argued that process safety is fundamentally a process control problem, yet few research efforts have been directed toward integrating the rather disparate domains of process safety and process control. Economic model predictive control (EMPC) has attracted significant attention recently due to its ability to optimize process operation accounting directly for process economics considerations. However, there is very limited work on the problem of integrating safety considerations in EMPC to ensure simultaneous safe operation and maximization of process profit. Motivated by the above considerations, this work develops three EMPC schemes that adjust in real‐time the size of the safety sets in which the process state should reside to ensure safe process operation and feedback control of the process state while optimizing economics via time‐varying process operation. Recursive feasibility and closed‐loop stability are established for a sufficiently small EMPC sampling period. The proposed schemes, which effectively integrate feedback control, process economics, and safety considerations, are demonstrated with a chemical process example. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 2391–2409, 2016     

Sequential and iterative architectures for distributed model predictive control of nonlinear process systems

In this work, we focus on distributed model predictive control of large scale nonlinear process systems in which several distinct sets of manipulated inputs are used to regulate the process. For each set of manipulated inputs, a different model predictive controller is used to compute the control actions, which is able to communicate with the rest of the controllers in making its decisions. Under the assumption that feedback of the state of the process is available to all the distributed controllers at each sampling time and a model of the plant is available, we propose two different distributed model predictive control architectures. In the first architecture, the distributed controllers use a one‐directional communication strategy, are evaluated in sequence and each controller is evaluated only once at each sampling time; in the second architecture, the distributed controllers utilize a bi‐directional communication strategy, are evaluated in parallel and iterate to improve closed‐loop performance. In the design of the distributed model predictive controllers, Lyapunov‐based model predictive control techniques are used. To ensure the stability of the closed‐loop system, each model predictive controller in both architectures incorporates a stability constraint which is based on a suitable Lyapunov‐based controller. We prove that the proposed distributed model predictive control architectures enforce practical stability in the closed‐loop system and optimal performance. The theoretical results are illustrated through a catalytic alkylation of benzene process example. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010     

Assessment and comparison of distributed model predictive control schemes: Application to a natural gas refrigeration plant

A number of decentralized and distributed control schemes based on model predictive control (MPC) have been introduced in the last years. They have been proposed as viable solutions to the computational, transmission and robustness issues arising in the centralized context in case of large-scale and/or distributed plants. Such MPC-based control schemes are very heterogeneous, based on different model structures and realizations, with different features and infrastructural/memory/computational requirements.In this paper, we test and compare, with a realistic case study, a robust non-cooperative scheme and a cooperative iterative one. The main scope is to analyze and unravel, in a fair comparison scenario, these methods from different viewpoints, spanning from the model realization issues to the communication and computational requirements, to the control performances. The benchmark case study consists of an existing natural gas refrigeration plant. Realistic simulations and validation tests are obtained through in the DynSim industrial process simulation environment.     

Selection of control configurations for economic model predictive control systems

Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a feedback control method that dictates a potentially dynamic (time‐varying) operating policy to optimize the process economics. The objective function used in the EMPC system may be a general nonlinear function that describes the process/system economics. As this function is not derived on the sole basis of classical control considerations (stabilization, tracking, and optimal control action calculation) but rather on the basis of economics, selecting the appropriate control configuration, and quantifying the influence of a given input on an economic cost is an important task for the proper design and computational efficiency of an EMPC scheme. Owing to these considerations, an input selection methodology for EMPC is proposed which utilizes the relative degree and the sensitivity of the economic cost with respect to an input to identify and select stabilizing manipulated inputs with the most dynamic and steady‐state influence on the economic cost function to be assigned to EMPC. Other considerations for input selection for EMPC are also discussed and integrated into a proposed input selection methodology for EMPC. The control configuration selection method for EMPC is demonstrated using a chemical process example. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 3230–3242, 2014     

Real‐time economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems

Closed‐loop stability of nonlinear systems under real‐time Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) with potentially unknown and time‐varying computational delay is considered. To address guaranteed closed‐loop stability (in the sense of boundedness of the closed‐loop state in a compact state‐space set), an implementation strategy is proposed which features a triggered evaluation of the LEMPC optimization problem to compute an input trajectory over a finite‐time prediction horizon in advance. At each sampling period, stability conditions must be satisfied for the precomputed LEMPC control action to be applied to the closed‐loop system. If the stability conditions are not satisfied, a backup explicit stabilizing controller is applied over the sampling period. Closed‐loop stability under the real‐time LEMPC strategy is analyzed and specific stability conditions are derived. The real‐time LEMPC scheme is applied to a chemical process network example to demonstrate closed‐loop stability and closed‐loop economic performance improvement over that achieved for operation at the economically optimal steady state. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 555–571, 2015     

Distributed lyapunov‐based model predictive control with neighbor‐to‐neighbor communication

This work considers distributed predictive control of large‐scale nonlinear systems with neighbor‐to‐neighbor communication. It fulfills the gap between the existing centralized Lyapunov‐based model predictive control (LMPC) and the cooperative distributed LMPC and provides a balanced solution in terms of implementation complexity and achievable performance. This work focuses on a class of nonlinear systems with subsystems interacting with each other via their states. For each subsystem, an LMPC is designed based on the subsystem model and the LMPC only communicates with its neighbors. At a sampling time, a subsystem LMPC optimizes its future control input trajectory assuming that the states of its upstream neighbors remain the same as (or close to) their predicted state trajectories obtained at the previous sampling time. Both noniterative and iterative implementation algorithms are considered. The performance of the proposed designs is illustrated via a chemical process example. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 4124–4133, 2014     

基于ARX-PLS解耦框架下的多回路约束迭代模型预测控制方法(英文)

A multi-loop constrained model predictive control scheme based on autoregressive exogenous-partial least squares （ARX-PLS） framework is proposed to tackle the high dimension, coupled and constraints problems in industry processes due to safety limitation, environmental regulations, consumer specifications and physical restric-tion. ARX-PLS decoupling character enables to turn the multivariable model predictive control （MPC） controller design in original space into the multi-loop single input single output （SISO） MPC controllers design in latent space. An idea of iterative method is applied to decouple the constraints latent variables in PLS framework and recursive least square is introduced to identify ARX-PLS model. This algorithm is applied to a non-square simulation system and a stirred reactor for ethylene polymerizations comparing with adaptive internal model control （IMC） method based on ARX-PLS framework. Its application has shown that this method outperforms adaptive IMC method based on ARX-PLS framework to some extent.     

Handling multi‐rate and missing data in variable duration economic model predictive control of batch processes

In the present work, we consider the problem of variable duration economic model predictive control of batch processes subject to multi‐rate and missing data. To this end, we first generalize a recently developed subspace‐based model identification approach for batch processes to handle multi‐rate and missing data by utilizing the incremental singular value decomposition technique. Exploiting the fact that the proposed identification approach is capable of handling inconsistent batch lengths, the resulting dynamic model is integrated into a tiered EMPC formulation that optimizes process economics (including batch duration). Simulation case studies involving application to the energy intensive electric arc furnace process demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach compared to a traditional trajectory tracking approach subject to limited availability of process measurements, missing data, measurement noise, and constraints. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 2705–2718, 2017     

Economic model predictive control of stochastic nonlinear systems

This work focuses on the design of stochastic Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (SLEMPC) systems for a broad class of stochastic nonlinear systems with input constraints. Under the assumption of stabilizability of the origin of the stochastic nonlinear system via a stochastic Lyapunov‐based control law, an economic model predictive controller is proposed that utilizes suitable constraints based on the stochastic Lyapunov‐based controller to ensure economic optimality, feasibility and stability in probability in a well‐characterized region of the state‐space surrounding the origin. A chemical process example is used to illustrate the application of the approach and demonstrate its economic benefits with respect to an EMPC scheme that treats the disturbances in a deterministic, bounded manner. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 64: 3312–3322, 2018