The role of G-regulatory proteins in the intracellular mechanism of cardiac angiotensin-II receptors

High-affinity angiotensin II receptors have been identified in cardiac tissue of many animal species. In the heart, angiotensin II exerts positive inotropic and chronotropic effects, constricts coronary vessels, and stimulates cell growth. In vascular smooth muscle and adrenal cortex angiotensin II interacts with guanidine nucleotide regulatory proteins because GTP-gamma-S causes dissociation of the radioligand from its receptor. To investigate whether angiotensin II interacts with guanidine nucleotide regulatory proteins also in cardiac tissue, we studied the effects of GTP-gamma-S on [Sar1, Ile8]-angiotensin II binding to angiotensin II receptor subtypes (AT1 and AT2) in hearts obtained from 16- to 20-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats. We employed an in situ technique performed on frozen tissue sections. Competition experiments performed with the nonpeptide inhibitors losartan and PD123177 allowed identification of both AT1 and AT2 angiotensin II receptors in rat heart. These receptors were present in comparable amounts. In a different set of experiments the effects of GTP-gamma-S (100 microM) on radioligand displacement from AT1 and AT2 receptors were studied. GTP-gamma-S caused a progressive dissociation of the radioligand from the AT1 receptor indicating that this receptor interacts with guanidine nucleotide regulatory proteins. In contrast, the AT2 receptor does not appear to directly interact with guanidine nucleotide regulatory proteins. In summary, the study shows that both angiotensin II receptor subtypes are present in rat heart and that guanidine nucleotide regulatory proteins are implicated in the signal transduction mechanism of the cardiac AT1 receptor.     

Localization of angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity in catecholaminergic neurons of the rat medulla oblongata

There exist at least two distinct subtypes of angiotensin II receptors in the brain, namely the AT1 and AT2 subtypes. The high density of angiotensin II AT1 receptors is present in the medulla oblongata. The AT1 subtype of angiotensin II receptors mainly mediates central cardiovascular events. In the present study a polyclonal antibody against the angiotensin II AT1 receptor and a monoclonal antibody against tyrosine hydroxylase were employed to evaluate the possible presence of angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity in the catecholaminergic neurons of the rat medulla oblongata by means of the double colour immunofluorescence technique. A weak, diffuse cytoplasmic angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity was observed in almost all the catecholaminergic cell bodies of the A2, C1, C2 and C3 cell groups, except those of the A1 cell group containing moderately intense, diffuse cytoplasmic angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity, occasionally found in the noradrenergic dendrites of the A1 cell group. There was a higher density of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactive profiles in the A2 cell group area than in other catecholaminergic cell group areas. In addition, the angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity was seen in non-catecholaminergic neurons. The present results provide evidence for the existence of the specific angiotensin II AT1 receptor-like immunoreactivity in the noradrenergic and adrenergic neurons of the rat medulla oblongata known to have a cardiovascular role. Thus, the findings support the view that angiotensin II AT1 receptors in the medulla oblongata participate in cardiovascular control and indicate a cellular substrate for the documented interaction between the angiotensin II and adrenergic transmission lines in cardiovascular function at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarii.     

Upregulation of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in the mouse nucleus accumbens by chronic haloperidol treatment

The distribution of angiotensin II AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes were mapped in the mouse brain by in vitro autoradiography. Along with a differing distribution of AT1 and AT2 receptors in the hind brain compared to the rat, moderate densities of AT1 receptors were observed in dopamine-rich regions, namely the caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens, previously observed in the human, but not rat or rabbit. Considering our previous anatomical and functional studies demonstrating an interaction between brain angiotensin II and dopaminergic systems, the effect of chronic treatment with the dopamine antagonist, haloperidol, on AT1 and AT2 receptor levels was investigated in the mouse brain. Haloperidol treatment for 21 days resulted in an increase in angiotensin II AT1 receptor levels in the nucleus accumbens, accompanied by an increase in dopamine D2 receptors, but no change in dopamine D1 receptors. Striatal AT1 receptors did not alter with treatment, nor did AT1 or AT2 receptors in a number of brain regions not associated with dopaminergic systems, such as the median preoptic nucleus, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, and nucleus of the solitary tract. The present study suggests that brain angiotensin II-dopamine interactions extend beyond the known effects on the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, to the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system.     

Angiotensin II receptor blockade and end-organ protection: pharmacological rationale and evidence

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system is a widely studied hormonal system that comprises substrate-enzyme interactions, the end result of which is the production of the active peptide angiotensin II. Because angiotensin II affects blood pressure control, sodium and water homeostasis, and cardiovascular function and structure, a great deal of research effort has been directed toward blocking the renin-angiotensin system. Angiotensin II also may be involved in end-organ damage in hypertension, heart failure, and vascular disease. ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTORS: At least two subtypes of angiotensin II receptors have been identified, angiotensin type 1 (AT)1 and type 2 (AT2). The AT1 receptor mediates all the known actions of angiotensin II on blood pressure control. Additionally, research has indicated that the AT1 receptor modulates cardiac contractility and glomerular filtration, increases renal tubular sodium reabsorption, and cardiac and vascular hypertrophy. Less is known about the function of the AT2 receptor. Evidence suggests that the AT2 receptor inhibits cell proliferation and reverses the AT1-induced hypertrophy. Indeed, these receptors are thought to exert opposing effects. ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS: This newly introduced class of drugs is able to inhibit the renin-angiotensin system at the receptor level by specifically blocking the AT1 receptor subtype. These drugs induce a dose-dependent blockade of angiotensin II effects, resulting in reduced blood pressure, urinary protein, and glomerular sclerosis. It is postulated that AT1 receptor antagonists may provide end-organ protection by blocking angiotensin II effects via the AT1 receptor, leaving the AT2 receptor unopposed. Consequently, these agents may reduce the morbidity and mortality that result from myocardial infarction and other conditions resulting from structural alterations in the heart, kidney, and vasculature.     

Does blockade of angiotensin II receptors offer clinical benefits over inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme?

Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists represent a new class of drugs for the treatment of hypertension. They are specific for the renin-angiotensin system, selective for the angiotensin AT1 receptor, and act independently of the angiotensin II synthetic pathway. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system at the receptor level should therefore be more complete. The high circulating levels of angiotensin II following angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade could be beneficial in stimulating other unblocked angiotensin receptors, especially the AT2 receptor. It has been proposed that the angiotensin AT2 receptor, which is re-expressed or up-regulated during pathological circumstances, counterbalances the effect of the stimulation of the angiotensin AT1 receptor. Through this mechanism, angiotensin AT1 antagonists may be superior to ACE inhibitors in cardiac and vascular remodelling as well as in kidney insufficiency. Long-term trials are required to demonstrate the possible clinical superiority of this new class of antihypertensive agents.     

Inhibition of sympathetic outflow by the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan, but not by losartan, valsartan or irbesartan: relationship to differences in prejunctional angiotensin II receptor blockade

It is well established that angiotensin II can enhance sympathetic nervous system function by activating prejunctional angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. Stimulation of these receptors enhances stimulus-evoked norepinephrine release, leading to increased activation of vascular alpha 1-adrenoceptors and consequently to enhanced vasoconstriction. In the present study, the effects of several chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists were evaluated on pressor responses evoked by activation of sympathetic outflow through spinal cord stimulation in the pithed rat. Stimulation of thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow in pithed rats produced frequency-dependent pressor responses. Infusion of sub-pressor doses of angiotensin II (40 ng/kg/min) shifted leftward the frequency-response curves for increases in blood pressure, indicating augmented sympathetic outflow. Furthermore, pressor responses resulting in spinal cord stimulation were inhibited by the peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, Sar1, Ile8 [angiotensin II] (10 micrograms/kg/min). These results confirm the existence of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors at the vascular neuroeffector junction that facilitate release of norepinephrine. The nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan (0.3 mg/kg i.v.), inhibited the pressor response induced by spinal cord stimulation in a manner similar to that observed with the peptide antagonist, Sar1, Ile8[angiotensin II]. In contrast, equivalent doses (0.3 mg/kg i.v.) of other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, such as losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan, had no effect on spinal cord stimulation of sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat. Although the mechanism by which eprosartan, but not the other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, inhibits sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat is unknown, one possibility is that eprosartan is a more effective antagonist of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors that augment neurotransmitter release. Because eprosartan is more effective in inhibiting sympathetic nervous system activity compared to other chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, eprosartan may be more effective in lowering systolic blood pressure and in treating isolated systolic hypertension.     

Renal effects of AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonists (AT1ra)

RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN ANTAGONISTS: The renal effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AT1 blockers) can be compared with another class of drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, i.e. the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE1). SIMILAR BUT SPECIFIC EFFECTS: The renal effects of these two classes of drugs are similar but each class has specific effects explained by several mechanisms. i) The system includes a large number of active peptides (angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin 1-7) which exert various effects according to their specific receptor(s): ii) several types of angiotensin II receptors have been identified (AT1, AT2, AT4 ...). Only AT1 blockers are available in clinical practice. iii) Receptor or enzyme blockade can produce varying effects; ACE inhibition is not specific since increased bradykinin activity is associated with the suppression of angiotensin peptide generation. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRIALS: Experimental and recent clinical studies have shown that AT1 blockers can induce, like ACE1, hypotension, renal vasodilation and natriuresis. The definite effects on discrete renal structures (vessels, glomeruli, tubules) differ however in magnitude which may suggest specific indications according to the pathophysiological background (renal disease, congestive heart failure, etc.).     

Comparative pharmacology of recombinant rat AT1A, AT1B and human AT1 receptors expressed by transfected COS-M6 cells

1. Currently available antagonists and agonists cannot distinguish between angiotensin AT1 receptor subtypes. 2. We synthesized a series of compounds selected on the basis of having the most diverse structural features with respect to losartan (DuP753), the prototype non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonist. Using a radioligand-receptor binding assay and membranes prepared from COS-M6 cells transfected with individual AT1 receptor subtypes, we determined whether any of these compounds could distinguish between the receptor subtypes. 3. The diversity of the structural features of this series of compounds was reflected by the wide range of affinities (pIC50 values) displayed towards competing with [125I]-Sar1Ile8 angiotensin II for binding to the AT1 receptors. 4. Direct comparisons of the pIC50 values of individual compounds for rat AT1A, AT1B and human AT1 receptors revealed only minor differences. 5. It is concluded that compounds based structurally on losartan are unlikely to distinguish between these receptors.     

Inhibition of cyclic AMP-dependent kinase by expression of a protein kinase inhibitor/enhanced green fluorescent fusion protein attenuates angiotensin II-induced type 1 AT1 receptor mRNA down-regulation in vascular smooth muscle cells

Expression of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) mRNA in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) is down-regulated by a variety of agonists, including growth factors, agonists of Galphaq protein-coupled receptors, and activators of adenylyl cyclase. To determine whether cAMP-dependent protein kinases (PKA) participates in AT1-R mRNA down-regulation controlled by multiple classes of receptors, a PKA inhibitor peptide (PKIalpha) was developed and expressed in rat VSMC as a fusion with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). PKA activity elicited both by forskolin and angiotensin II is suppressed in cells expressing this fusion protein (PKIalpha-eGFP), but platelet-derived growth factor-BB does not stimulate PKA activity in this preparation. PKIalpha-eGFP expression fully inhibits the forskolin-stimulated down-regulation of AT1-R mRNA levels and blocks 50% of the effect elicited by angiotensin II. This indicates that PKA plays a substantial role in angiotensin II-stimulated AT1-R mRNA down-regulation. However, inhibition of PKA has no effect on AT1-R mRNA down-regulation caused by platelet-derived growth factor-BB. These findings show how agonists such as angiotensin II that are not normally considered as activators of PKA can use PKA-dependent processes to modulate gene expression. These findings also provide definitive evidence that PKA-dependent pathways are involved in modulation of AT1-R mRNA levels in VSMC.     

The hyperglycemia induced by angiotensin II in rats is mediated by AT1 receptors

We have shown that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in glucose homeostasis during acute hemorrhage. Since almost all of the physiological actions described for angiotensin II were mediated by AT1 receptors, the present experiments were designed to determine the participation of AT1 receptors in the hyperglycemic action of angiotensin II in freely moving rats. The animals were divided into two experimental groups: 1) animals submitted to intravenous administration of angiotensin II (0.96 nmol/100 g body weight) which caused a rapid increase in plasma glucose reaching the highest values at 5 min after the injection (33% of the initial values, P < 0.01), and 2) animals submitted to intravenous administration of DuP-753 (losartan), a non-peptide antagonist of angiotensin II with AT1-receptor type specificity (1.63 mumol/100 g body weight as a bolus, i.v., plus a 30-min infusion of 0.018 mumol 100 g body weight-1 min-1 before the injection of angiotensin II), which completely blocked the hyperglycemic response to angiotensin II (P < 0.01). This inhibitory effect on glycemia was already demonstrable 5 min (8.9 +/- 0.28 mM, angiotensin II, N = 9 vs 6.4 +/- 0.22 mM, losartan plus angiotensin II, N = 11) after angiotensin II injection and persisted throughout the 30-min experiment. Controls were treated with the same volume of saline solution (0.15 M NaCl). These data demonstrate that the angiotensin II receptors involved in the direct and indirect hyperglycemic actions of angiotensin II are mainly of the AT1-type.     

Increased pressor function of central vasopressinergic system in hypertensive renin transgenic rats

OBJECTIVE: Renin transgenic hypertensive rats [TGR(mRen2)27] have increased contents of angiotensin II and arginine vasopressin (AVP) in the cardiovascular brain regions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of centrally released AVP on the regulation of baseline blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats and to determine the interaction between AVP and angiotensin II in the central control of blood pressure in this model of hypertension. DESIGN: Three basic series of experiments were performed on 20 TGR(mRen2)27 and 20 Hannover Sprague-Dawley conscious rats, chronically instrumented with lateral cerebral ventricle (LCV) cannulae and femoral artery catheters. In series 1, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during an LCV infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid before and after LCV administration of angiotensin II. In series 2, the effects of an LCV administration of angiotensin 11 (100 ng) on mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined during LCV infusion of a selective AVP receptor (V1) antagonist [1-(1-mercapto-4-methylcyclohexaneacetic acid)-8-arginine vasopressin (MeCAAVP) and d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Ala-NH2(9)]AVP] or a selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist (losartan) or both. In series 3, mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined after an LCV injection of either AVP (10 ng) or AVP together with angiotensin II. RESULTS: The LCV infusions of antagonists to V1 and AT1 receptors caused significant comparable decreases in baseline MAP in TGR(mRen2)27 but not in Sprague-Dawley rats. Angiotensin II elicited significant pressor responses, both in TGR(mRen2)27 and in Sprague-Dawley rats. Blockade of V1 receptors significantly reduced the duration and the maximum amplitude of the central pressor response to angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats, whereas in Sprague-Dawley rats the maximum pressor effect was not significantly altered. In both strains, the pressor response to angiotensin II was abolished by blockade of AT1 receptors. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the elevated blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats is partly caused by increased function of the brain angiotensinergic AT1 and vasopressinergic V1 systems. Centrally released AVP is involved in mediation of the pressor effect exerted by centrally applied angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats.     

Intraluminal duodenal diverticulum presenting as obstructive chronic pancreatitis

The presence of angiotensin II receptors was found on cells of three colorectal carcinoma cell lines. The binding assays with 125I-labelled angiotensin II and ligands specific for angiotensin AT1 or AT2 receptors showed that angiotensin receptors on colorectal cancer cells are mostly of the AT2 type. The binding capacity of tumor cells was not significantly changed by butyrate-induced differentiation.     

Chromosomal localization of angiotensin II type 1 receptor isoforms in the rat

The cDNA sequences of two different isoforms of the rat angiotensin II type 1 receptors, AT1A and AT1B, have been reported. A single set of polymerase chain reaction primers was used to amplify sequence from both AT1A and AT1B from rat genomic DNA. Genomic DNA from a panel of rat x mouse somatic hybrid cell lines which had been characterized as to the rat chromosomal content was then amplified with these primers. The amplified products from rat AT1A and AT1B were distinguished from each other and those of the mouse by the use of differential restriction patterns. Using this method, AT1A was localized to rat chromosome 17 and AT1B to rat chromosome 2.     

Effects of angiotensin II on expression of the gap junction channel protein connexin43 in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate signal transduction pathways regulating expression of myocardial gap junction channel proteins (connexins) and to determine whether mediators of cardiac hypertrophy might promote remodeling of gap junctions, we characterized the effects of angiotensin II on expression of the major cardiac gap junction protein connexin43 (Cx43) in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. BACKGROUND: Remodeling of the distribution of myocardial gap junctions appears to be an important feature of anatomic substrates of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart disease. Remodeling of intercellular connections may be initiated by changes in connexin expression caused by chemical mediators of the hypertrophic response. METHODS: Cultures were exposed to 0.1 micromol/liter angiotensin II for 6 or 24 h, and Cx43 expression was characterized by immunoblotting, confocal microscopy and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Immunoblot analysis revealed a twofold increase in Cx43 content in cells treated for 24 h with angiotensin II (n=4, p < 0.05). This response was inhibited by the presence of 1.0 micromol/liter losartan, an AT1-receptor blocker. Confocal and electron microscopy demonstrated enhanced Cx43 immunoreactivity and increases in the number and size of gap junction profiles in cells exposed to angiotensin II for 24 h. These effects were also blocked by losartan. Immunoprecipitation of Cx43 from cells metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine demonstrated 2.4- and 2.9-fold increases in Cx43 radioactivity after 6 and 24 h exposure to angiotensin II, respectively (p < 0.03 at each time point). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II up-regulates gap junctions in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes by increasing Cx43 synthesis. Signal transduction pathways activated by angiotensin II under pathophysiologic conditions could initiate remodeling of conduction pathways, leading to the development of anatomic substrates of arrhythmias.     

Angiotensin I modulates Ca-transport systems in the rat heart through angiotensin II

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of angiotensin I (Ang I) treatment in vivo on two major Ca-transport systems-the L-type voltage dependent calcium channel (L-VDCC) and the Na/Ca exchanger in rat heart. For our experiments we used four groups of rats, treated differently with saline, Ang I, the ACE inhibitor enalapril and/or combination of both for 6 days, every 24 h. We observed an increase in the activity, and also in mRNA expression of the Na/Ca exchanger, after repeated administration of Ang I in vivo. The maximal binding capacity of Ca-antagonist PN 200-110, which binds to the alpha 1 subunit of the L-VDCC was elevated from 0.8-1.85 pg/mg protein. mRNA expression of the voltage-dependent calcium channels of L-type system was also upregulated by Ang I administration, but not when enalapril was applied simultaneously with Ang I. These results demonstrate that in vivo application of the Ang I significantly modulates not only the activity, but also expression of the Na/Ca exchanger and the L-VDCC in rat hearts through angiotensin II (Ang II). Since in the in vitro experiments on the isolated cardiomyocytes, Ang II (100 nM) increased the calcium uptake after depolarization, and the AT1 receptor agonist losartan prevented this increase, we assume that this regulation might involve the AT1 receptors.     

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates endotoxin induced suppression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the rat

Little is known regarding the developmental regulation of the cardiac angiotensin type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) receptor genes or their role in normal cardiac growth. Regulation of AT1 and AT2 receptor genes were examined using total and poly A + RNA isolated from whole Sprague-Dawley rat hearts. AT1 mRNA levels were 3.5-fold higher in the 19-day-old fetal heart compared to the 90-day-old adult as detected with 2 or 5 microg of poly A + RNA. AT2 mRNA was only detectable with 20 microg of poly A + RNA. AT2 mRNA levels were highest in the 19-day-old fetal heart with no detectable message in the 90-day-old adult heart. Qualitative PCR for AT2 mRNA also could not detect AT2 mRNA in the adult heart. Treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan for 3 weeks in the 21-day-old rat or for 4 days in the 38-day-old rat resulted in a significant decrease in heart/body weight in both groups and body weight in the 3-week treatment group. AT2 blockade for 4 days with PD123319 or beta-receptor blockade with propranolol for 3 weeks did not alter heart/body weights. Losartan treatment also resulted in a three-fold increase in cardiac AT1 mRNA levels in both the 4-day and 3-week treatment groups compared to controls. We conclude that Ang II, acting primarily, if not exclusively via the AT1 receptor plays a significant role in the regulation of normal cardiac growth in the young rat.     

Comparison of ultrafast half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence with turbo spin-echo sequences for T2-weighted imaging of the female pelvis

1. This investigation was undertaken to compare pre- and postjunctional receptors involved in the responses of the canine mesenteric and pulmonary arteries to angiotensin II. 2. In the mesenteric artery, angiotensin II caused an enhancement of tritium overflow evoked by electrical stimulation (EC30% = 5 nM), the maximal effect representing an increase by about 45%. Postjunctionally, angiotensin II caused concentration-dependent contractions (pD2 = 8.57). Saralasin antagonized both pre- and postjunctional effects of angiotensin II, but it was more potent at post- than at prejunctional level (pA2 of 9.51 and 8.15, respectively), while losartan antagonized exclusively the postjunctional effects of angiotensin II (pA = 8.15). PD123319 had no antagonist effect either pre- or postjunctionally. 3. In the pulmonary artery, angiotensin II also caused an enhancement of the electrically-evoked tritium overflow (EC30% = 1.54 nM), its maximal effect increasing tritium overflow by about 80%. Postjunctionally, angiotensin II caused contractile responses (pD2 = 8.52). As in the mesenteric artery, saralasin antagonized angiotensin II effects at both pre- and postjunctional level and it was more potent postjunctionally (pA2 of 9.58 and 8.10, respectively). Losartan antagonized only the postjunctional effects of angiotensin II (pA2 = 7.96) and PD123319 was ineffective. 4. It is concluded that in both vessels: (1) pre- and postjunctional receptors belong to a different subtype, since they are differently antagonized by the same antagonists; (2) postjunctional receptors belong to AT1 subtype, since they are blocked by losartan but not by AT2 antagonists; (3) prejunctional receptors apparently belong to neither AT1 or AT2 subtype since they are blocked by neither AT1 nor AT2 antagonists.     

The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats

The renal effects of angiotensin II(AII) are attributed to AT1 receptors. In contrast, the function of renal AT2 receptors in unknown. Using a microdialysis technique, we monitored changes in renal interstitial fluid (RIF) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate (cGMP) in response to dietary sodium (Na) depletion alone, or Na depletion or normal Na diet combined with the AT1 receptor blocker, Losartan, the AT2 receptor blocker, PD 123319 (PD), or angiotensin II, individually or combined in conscious rats. Na depletion significantly increased PGE2 and cGMP. During Na depletion, Losartan decreased PGE2 and did not change cGMP. In contrast, PD significantly increased PGE2 and decreased cGMP. Combined administration of Losartan and PD decreased PGE2 and cGMP. During normal Na diet, RIF PGE2 and cGMP increased in response to angiotensin II. Neither Losartan nor PD, individually or combined, changed RIF PGE2 or cGMP. Combined administration of angiotensin II and Losartan or PD produced a significant decrease in response of PGE2 and cGMP to angiotensin II, respectively. These data demonstrate that activation of the reninangiotensin system during Na depletion increases renal interstitial PGE2 and cGMP. The AT1 receptor mediates renal production of PGE2. The AT2 receptor mediates cGMP. AT2 blockade potentiates angiotensin-induced PGE2 production at the AT1 receptor.     

Mechanisms of angiotensin II chronotropic effect in anaesthetized dogs

1. The chronotropic effect of angiotensin II (5 micrograms in 1 ml of Tyrode solution), injected directly into the sinus node artery of 24 anaesthestized and vagotomized dogs pretreated with a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, was evaluated before and after the administration of: (a) an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan, 50 micrograms kg-1 min-1 infused i.v. for 120 min), (b) an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist (prazosin, 1 mg kg-1 i.v. bolus injected), (c) a Ca2+ channel blocker (nifedipine 50, 100 and 200 micrograms kg-1 i.v. bolus injected) and (d) a protein kinase inhibitor (staurosporine, 800 nM infused via the sinus node artery at 0.6 ml min-1 for 15 min). 2. Losartan and staurosporine by themselves had no effect on basal systemic arterial pressure and heart rate, whereas prazosin and nifedipine caused significant diminutions of both parameters. 3. Angiotensin II induced significant increases in heart rate, the mean augmentations being 29 +/- 2 beats min-1. Losartan, nifedipine and staurosporine significantly decreased the chronotropic effect of angiotensin II, the mean respective diminutions being 65 +/- 8, 40 +/- 9 and 64 +/- 10%, whereas prazosin had no effect. 4. This work has demonstrated that angiotensin II exerts in vivo a significant positive chronotropic effect that is mediated via AT1 receptors located in the region of the sinoatrial node. This effect is independent of the adrenergic system. It is decreased by the inhibition of the production of protein kinases, most probably of protein kinase C, and by the blockade of the voltage-sensitive L-type Ca2+ channels. Other studies are obviously needed to ascertain the role of angiotensin II in the control of heart rate and/or the genesis of arrhythmias.     

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis and antagonizes angiotensin II type 1 receptor action: an in vitro gene transfer study

Angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor is expressed abundantly in the fetal vasculature with rapid decline after birth and re-expressed in the adult vasculature after injury, whereas angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor is expressed. We studied their effects on apoptosis in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Serum starvation induced VSMC DNA fragmentation and the stimulation of AT1 receptor inhibited this apoptotic change. We transfected rat AT2 receptor cDNA, since cultured adult VSMCs show very low level of endogenous AT2 receptor. In AT2 receptor transfected VSMC, selective stimulation of AT2 receptor facilitated serum-deprivation-induced apoptosis and AT1 receptor stimulation inhibited it. Moreover we observed that AT1 receptor stimulation activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), whereas the AT2 receptor stimulation inhibited the activation of ERK. Taken together, our results suggest that AT1 and AT2 receptors exert counteracting effects on ERK activation and consequently VSMC apoptosis and differential expression of these receptors may participate in vascular development and vascular remodeling.