Favourable effect of olive oil in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. The effect on blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid levels of a high-fat diet rich in monounsaturated fat compared with a carbohydrate-rich diet

The aim of the study was to elucidate the role of the neuropeptide galanin in the regulation of somatotropic and gonadotropic function in normal women. Thirteen normally ovulating (aged 28 to 40 years), non-obese (body mass index, 18.4 to 27.1 kg/m2) women with infertility due to a tubal or male factor were studied. Each woman underwent three tests: (1) bolus intravenous (IV) injection of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1-29)NH2 1 microgram/kg plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) 100 micrograms at time 0; (2) IV infusion of porcine galanin 500 micrograms in 100 mL saline from -10 minutes; and (3) bolus IV injection of GHRH(1-29)NH2 1 microgram/kg plus GnRH 100 micrograms at time 0 plus IV infusion of porcine galanin 500 micrograms in 100 mL saline from -10 to +30 minutes. All results are expressed as the mean +/- SEM. GH peak after GHRH was 14 +/- 5 micrograms/L; porcine galanin significantly increased serum GH (GH peak, 7.3 +/- 1.2) with respect to baseline levels. No significant differences were observed between either GH peak or GH absolute values after galanin as compared with GHRH alone. Porcine galanin significantly enhanced GH response to GHRH (peak, 31.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L) with respect to either GHRH or galanin alone. Luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks after GnRH were 16.5 +/- 5.3 and 17.4 +/- 4 IU/L, respectively. Porcine galanin did not cause significant increases in serum LH and FSH levels with respect to baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Alcoholism abolishes the growth hormone response to sumatriptan administration in man

To assess the possible influence of alcoholism on serotonergic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion, 6 mg of the 5-HT1D serotonergic receptor agonist, sumatriptan, was injected subcutaneously in a group of nine normal controls (aged 32 to 49 years) and in nine age-matched nondepressed male alcoholic subjects after 10 to 25 days of abstinence from alcohol. During the same period, subjects were also tested with GH-releasing hormone ([GHRH] 1 microgram/kg body weight in an intravenous [i.v.] bolus) and L-arginine, which releases GH from somatostatin inhibition (50 g in 50 mL normal saline over 30 minutes) to determine whether GH secretion in response to alternate secretagogues is preserved in alcoholics. A control test with administration of normal saline instead of drug treatments was also performed. Plasma GH levels were recorded over 2 hours in all tests. Administration of placebo did not change plasma GH levels in any subject. Similar GH responses were observed in normal controls and alcoholic subjects when GHRH or arginine were administered. A significant GH increase was observed in normal controls after sumatriptan injection; in contrast, GH secretion was not modified by sumatriptan administration in alcoholic patients. These data show that alcoholism is associated with an impairment in the serotonergic-stimulatory regulation of GH secretion, whereas GH responses to direct pituitary stimulation with GHRH or to release from somatostatinergic inhibition with arginine appear to be preserved in alcoholics.     

Association between Ala54Thr substitution of the fatty acid-binding protein 2 gene with insulin resistance and intra-abdominal fat thickness in Japanese men

In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), inappropriate growth hormone (GH) responses to several stimuli, including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), have been described. A decreased hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone is one of the most likely explanations for these findings. His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 [GH-releasing peptide-6 [GHRP-6]] is a synthetic hexapeptide that stimulates GH release in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism of action of GHRP-6 is unknown, but it probably does not inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Also, GHRH and GHRP-6 apparently activate different intracellular pathways to release GH. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a differential effect of IDDM on GHRP-6- and GHRH-induced GH secretion. Six patients with IDDM and seven control subjects were studied. Each subject received GHRP-6 (1 microgram/kg intravenously [IV]), GHRH (100 micrograms IV), and GHRP-6 + GHRH on 3 separate days. GH peak values (mean +/- SE in micrograms per liter) were similar in controls and diabetics after GHRH (22.5 +/- 7.8 v 24.0 +/- 9.7) and after GHRP-5 (20.5 +/- 5.3 v 24.4 +/- 6.3). The association of GHRP-6 and GHRH induced a significantly higher GH release than administration of the isolated peptides in both groups. The synergistic GH response to combined administration of GHRP-6 and GHRH was not different in controls (70.5 +/- 20.0) and diabetics (119.0 +/- 22.2). In summary, the effectiveness of GHRP-6 in IDDM could reinforce the evidence that this peptide probably does not release GH through a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Moreover, our data suggest that both GHRH and GHRP-6 releasing mechanisms are unaltered in IDDM.     

Television advertising for health

In 1985, Losa et al reported that an i.v. bolus injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was able to paradoxically stimulate PRL secretion in more than half of their acromegalic patients. However, this observation was not generally accepted since several other investigators have concluded that such an anomalous PRL response to GHRH was an extremely rare phenomenon in acromegaly. Therefore, in this study we examined a large number (51 patients) of active acromegalics in order to obtain more reliable data on the incidence of the paradoxical PRL response to GHRH in this disorder. Each patient underwent i.v. bolus injections of GHRH (100 micrograms) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 500 micrograms) on separate days, and plasma levels of GH and PRL were measured. The plasma PRL response to GHRH was considered positive (a paradoxical increase) when an increase over baseline of at least 50% occurred. We found that only 6 patients (12%) showed a positive PRL response to GHRH. These PRL-responders to GHRH had higher GH responses to this peptide than PRL-non-responders to GHRH. Although PRL-responders and non-responders to GHRH had a similar PRL responsiveness to TRH, the GH response to TRH was lower in PRL-responders to GHRH than PRL-non-responders to this peptide. In addition, PRL-non-responders to GHRH had lower basal GH and higher basal PRL levels than PRL-responders to GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Longtime administration of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) does not restore the reduced efficiency of GHRH on sleep endocrine activity in 2 old-aged subjects--a preliminary study

Aging results in a more shallow sleep accompanied by a blunted growth hormone (GH) secretion. In young male normal controls repetitive administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) at the beginning of the night results in an increased secretion of GH, a blunting of cortisol and a stimulation of slow-wave sleep (SWS). In healthy elderly men and women, however, GHRH exerts only weak effects on sleep-endocrine activity. In a previous report continuous treatment of healthy elderly males by repetitive administration of GHRH (during 12 days administration with 100 micrograms GHRH i.v. at 9.00 h every second day, "priming") enhanced GHRH stimulated GH secretion at daytime markedly. We tested if priming with GHRH results in a more distinct modulation of the nocturnal hormone secretion and of the sleep EEG than acute administration of the peptide. Two elderly male controls spent first three consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory, the first of which served for adaptation to laboratory conditions. During the two other nights (at days 1 and 2) sleep EEG was recorded and blood was sampled for determining the secretion of GH, cortisol and ACTH. In one of the nights the subjects received 50 micrograms GHRH hourly between 22.00 h and 1.00 h (4 x 50 micrograms) or placebo. The next examination followed after the priming period at day 14 and the last was performed two weeks after treatment at day 28. After the baseline administration of 4 x 50 micrograms GHRH before priming no clear changes of sleep EEG towards improved sleep were detectable, whereas GH secretion was increased. After priming sleep period time and SWS time were lower compared to the baseline night with GHRH administration, whereas REM time duration increased. GHRH induced GH secretion was not enhanced after priming. ACTH secretion was markedly enhanced compared to baseline stimulation. We conclude that priming with GHRH has no sleep improving effect and does not change hormone secretion in elderly normal subjects. Hence in the elderly priming with GHRH is not capable to induce a rejuvenation of sleep endocrine activity.     

Low-dose growth hormone-releasing hormone tests: a dose-response study

We have evaluated parameters of the serum growth hormone (GH) concentration response to saline and 1-, 10- and 100-micrograms intravenous bolus doses of amide analogue of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH (1-29)NH2) given in random order to 10 adult male volunteers of median body weight 68 (60-90)kg. Compared with saline, both 10- and 100-micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2 doses (but not 1 microgram) resulted in significant peak GH responses (means and 95% confidence intervals: 24.03 (11.22-51.29) vs 26.09 (16.40-41.50) mU/l, respectively). Although the average rate of serum GH rise was similar after both 10 micrograms (2.05 (1.13-2.97) mU.l-1.min-1) and 100 micrograms of GHRH(1-29)NH2 (1.52 (0.69-2.35) mU.l-1.min-1; ANOVA F = 0.93, p = 0.35), the average rate of serum GH decline after peak GH was slower after the higher dose (10 micrograms vs 100 micrograms: 0.65 (0.40-0.90) vs 0.37 (0.23-0.50) mU.l-1.min-1; ANOVA F = 5.14, p = 0.04), suggesting continued GH secretion. Increasing GHRH(1-29)NH2 doses delayed the time to peak GH (1 microgram: 7.00 (3.50-10.52) min; 10 micrograms: 15.80 (13.62-17.98) min; 100 micrograms: 24.80 (18.40-31.12) min) and serum GH levels were still elevated significantly 2 h after injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2 compared with other doses (saline: 0.98 (0.48-2.04) mU/l; 1 microgram: 0.68 (0.48-0.93) mU/l; 10 micrograms: 1.07 (0.56-2.04) mU/l; 100 micrograms: 5.01 (2.34-10.86) mU/l; ANOVA F = 11.10, p < 0.001). In a second study we tested five adult male volunteers with lower doses (0.5-10 micrograms) of GHRH(1-29)NH2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Blur and contrast as pictorial depth cues

OBJECTIVE: Infusion of GH secretagogues appears to be a novel endocrine approach to reverse the catabolic state of critical illness, through amplification of the endogenously blunted GH secretion associated with a substantial IGF-I rise. Here we report the dynamic characteristics of spontaneous nightly TSH and PRL secretion during prolonged critical illness, together with the concomitant effects exerted by the administration of GH-secretagogues, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) in particular, on night-time TSH and PRL secretion. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Twenty-six critically ill adults (mean +/- SEM age: 63 +/- 2 years) were studied during two consecutive nights (2100-0600 h). According to a weighed randomization, they received 1 of 4 combinations of infusions, within a randomized, cross-over design for each combination: placebo (one night) and GHRH (the next night) (n = 4); placebo and GHRP-2 (n = 10); GHRH and GHRP-2 (n = 6); GHRP-2 and GHRH + GHRP-2 (n = 6). Peptide infusions (duration 21 hours) were started after a bolus of 1 microgram/kg at 0900 h and infused (1 microgram/kg/h) until 0600 h. MEASUREMENTS: Serum concentrations of TSH and PRL were determined by IRMA every 20 minutes and T4, T3 and rT3 by RIA at 2100 h and 0600 h in each study night. Hormone secretion was quantified using deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: During prolonged critical illness, mean night-time serum concentrations of TSH (1.25 +/- 0.42 mlU/l) and PRL (9.4 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) were low-normal. However, the proportion of TSH and PRL that was released in a pulsatile fashion was low (32 +/- 6% and 16 +/- 2.6%) and no nocturnal TSH or PRL surges were observed. The serum levels of T3 (0.64 +/- 0.06 nmol/l) were low and were positively related to the number of TSH bursts (R2 = 0.32; P = 0.03) and to the log of pulsatile TSH production (R2 = 0.34; P = 0.03). GHRP-2 infusion further reduced the proportion of TSH released in a pulsatile fashion to half that during placebo infusion (P = 0.02), without altering mean TSH levels. GHRH infusion increased mean TSH levels and pulsatile TSH production, 2-fold compared to placebo (P = 0.03) and 3-fold compared to GHRP-2 (P = 0.008). The addition of GHRP-2 to GHRH infusion abolished the stimulatory effect of GHRH on pulsatile TSH secretion. GHRP-2 infusion induced a small increase in mean PRL levels (21%; P = 0.02) and basal PRL secretion rate (49%; P = 0.02) compared to placebo, as did GHRH and GHRH + GHRP-2. CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of the specific pattern of anterior pituitary function during prolonged critical illness is herewith extended to the dynamics of TSH and PRL secretion: mean serum levels are low-normal, no noctumal surge is observed and the pulsatile fractions of TSH and PRL release are reduced, as was shown previously for GH. Low circulating thyroid hormone levels appear positively correlated with the reduced pulsatile TSH secretion, suggesting that they have, at least in part, a neuroendocrine origin. Finally, the opposite effects of different GH-secretagogues on TSH secretion further delineate particular linkages between the somatotrophic and thyrotrophic axes during critical illness.     

Significance of chloride channel activation in the gamma-aminobutyric acid induced growth hormone secretion in the neonatal rat pituitary

Growth hormone (GH) secretion of the neonatal pituitary is stimulated by tau-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (1,2). Since in most cases GABA is known to act by increasing postsynaptic membrane permeability to chloride ions we tested the importance of chloride channel activation in the GH stimulatory effect of GABA in the neonatal pituitary. In the absence of chloride in the superfusion medium GABA was without effect on GH secretion of the neonatal pituitaries and its effect was attenuated by chloride channel inhibitors. The effect of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) on GH secretion was attenuated in the chloride-free media, but it was not affected by simultaneous administration of chloride channel blockers. The present study indicates that GH stimulatory effect of GABA in the neonatal pituitaries might involve chloride channel activation probably resulting in secondary activation of calcium channels.     

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) treatment potentiates growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulation in hemodialysis patients

On the basis of previously described effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) treatment on endocrine abnormalities present in uremia, we assessed the possible effect of treatment with rhEPO on growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) in a group of uremic patients. Eight patients on maintenance hemodialysis for 12 to 228 months, not previously treated with rhEPO, were tested with 100 micrograms of GHRH i.v. in bolus before and after three months of rhEPO treatment (40 U/kg i.v. three times a week). Before treatment, the GH response to GHRH was characterized, in uremic patients, by remarkable differences in plasma GH values and in the pattern of response curve in single patients. The variability of GH response was not modified after rhEPO treatment; however, an overall potentiation of GH response with a significant increase of plasma GH (p = 0.017 at 15 min, p = 0.035 at 30 min after GHRH injection) was observed in the tests performed after treatment. rhEPO administration induced an evident improvement of anemia, blood hemoglobin concentration being 5.3-7.6 g/dl before and 9.1-11.3 g/dl after treatment; however a demonstrable correlation between the potentiation of GH response to GHRH and the increase of hemoglobin concentration was not observed.     

Host defense within the urinary tract. I. Bacterial adhesion initiates an uroepithelial defense mechanism

The reliability and reproducibility of provocative stimuli of growth hormone (GH) secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency are still controversial both in childhood and in adulthood. The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and arginine (ARG), which likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, is one of the most potent stimuli known so far and has been proposed recently as the best test to explore the maximal somatotrope capacity of somatotrope cells. However, it is well known that, usually, provocative stimuli of GH secretion suffer from poor reproducibility and that of the GHRH + ARG test has still to be verified. We aimed to verify the between- and within-subject variability of the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test in normal subjects during their lifespan as well as in hypopituitaric patients with GH deficiency (GHD). In 10 normal children (C: six male and four female, age 12.3 +/- 0.9 years, body mass index (BMI) = 16.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, pubertal stages I-III), 18 normal young adults (Y: ten male and eight female, age 31.1 +/- 1.3 years, BMI = 21.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), 12 normal elderly subjects (E: two male and ten female, age 74.4 +/- 1.8 years, BMI= 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 15 panhypopituitaric GH-deficient patients (GHD: nine male and six female, age 40.9 +/- 4.1 years, BMI= 22.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m2), we studied the inter- and intra-individual variability of the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v.) in two different sessions at least 3 days apart. The GH responses to GHRH + ARG in C (1st vs 2nd session: 61.6 +/- 8.1 vs 66.5 +/- 9.4 microg/l), Y (70.4 +/- 10.1 vs 76.2 10.7 microg/l) and E (57.9 14.8 vs 52.1 +/- 8.0 microg/l) were similar and reproducible in all groups. The somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH + ARG also showed a limited within-subject variability (r = 0.71, 0.90 and 0.89 and p < 0.02, 0.0005 and 0.0005 for C, Y and E, respectively). Similarly in GHD, the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test showed a good inter- (1st vs 2nd session: 2.3 +/- 0.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 microg/l) and intra-individual reproducibility (r = 0.70, p < 0.005). The GHRH + ARG-induced GH responses in GHD were markedly lower (p < 0.0005) than those in age-matched controls and no overlap was found between GH peak responses in GHD and normal subjects. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH + ARG is very marked, independent of age and shows limited inter- and intra-individual variability. The GH response to the GHRH + ARG test is strikingly reduced in panhypopituitaric patients with GHD, in whom the low somatotrope responsiveness is reproducible. Thus, these findings strengthen the hypothesis that GHRH + ARG should be considered the most reliable test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells and to distinguish normal subjects from GHD patients in adulthood.     

Differential effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 and growth hormone on hypothalamic regulation of growth hormone secretion in the rat

Pharmacological administration of either growth hormone (GH) or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were reported to inhibit endogenous GH release in humans and in the laboratory animal. We have evaluated the short-term differential mechanisms whereby the two hormones affect hypothalamic regulation of GH secretion. Wistar male rats (90 days old) were injected i.p. with either GH (recombinant GH NIAMDD, Baltimore, MD, USA), rIGF-1 (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or saline. Animals were sacrificed at 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes following injection. Hypothalami were dissected and extracted immediately and the levels of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin were determined using specific antisera. Trunk blood was collected for GH and IGF-1 determination by RIA. Administration of IGF-1 or GH markedly decreased hypothalamic somatostatin stores by 77% and 54% respectively, within 15 minutes. Concomitantly, the wide range of GH levels found in the control group was reduced in the IGF-1 treated group suggesting that the pulsatile pattern of GH secretion was suppressed. Growth hormone administration induced an increase in hypothalamic GHRH stores (60% at 120 minutes). During this period serum IGF-1 levels were not altered. It is suggested that short term modulation of hypothalamic neurohormones by GH and IGF-1 is mediated by rapid stimulation of somatostatin release by both hormones, and inhibition of GHRH release is induced only by GH.     

Evaluation of pre- and postprandial growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH response in subjects with persistent body weight normalisation after biliopancreatic diversion

BACKGROUND: Obesity is characterised by growth hormone (GH) abnormalities, including a blunted response to stimulation and a 'paradoxical' increase after meals. The blunted GH release is reversed by a surgical intestinal bypass procedure. However, this does not mean that normal GH dynamics have been restored. The present study assessed whether post-surgical weight reduction in obese patients normalised the modulation of GH release produced by metabolic fuels. SUBJECTS: Ten obese female subjects, aged 23-54 y, were studied before and after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). All patients, after surgery, had experienced a significant reduction in body weight (mean body mass index (BMI) 25.78 +/- 1.01 kg/m2 vs 44.68 +/- 1.73 kg/m2). Two groups were also studied as controls: Ten normal body weight female subjects and ten patients suffering from anorexia nervosa (AN, mean BMI 17.46 +/- 1.12 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: We have studied the GH response to a GH releasing hormone (GHRH) bolus (1 microg/kg i.v., at 13.00 h) before and after a standard meal. RESULTS: In post-BPD subjects, the GH response to GHRH in the fasting state, was clearly augmented in comparison with the pre-BPD values (peak values 18.06 +/- 4.56 vs 3.24 +/- 0.68 microg/L). In post-BPD subjects the postprandial GH response was further augmented in comparison with the fasting test (peak 30.12 +/- 4.99 microg/L, P < 0.05). This pattern was similar to that observed in anorexic patients. CONCLUSION: The surgical procedure restores a normal GH response to GHRH in the fasting state, but the 'paradoxical' GH response after meals remains present, suggesting a persistent GH derangement in such patients, which is not related to body weight per se. The surgical procedure makes obese patients similar to anorexics, in the relationships between metabolic fuels and GH secretion. The persistence of the GH postprandial response to GHRH in post-BPD subjects suggests a role for metabolic fuels in the regulation of somatostatin (SRIF) secretion.     

Different effects of naloxone on the growth hormone response to melatonin and pyridostigmine in normal men

The effect of melatonin (MEL) (12 mg orally), pyridostigmine (60 mg orally), the combination of MEL and pyridostigmine, or placebo on growth hormone (GH) secretion was tested in seven normal men. In addition, MEL tests and pyridostigmine tests were repeated after pretreatment with naloxone (1.2-mg bolus followed by intravenous [i.v.] infusion of 1.6 mg/h for 3 hours). Serum GH levels increased fivefold after MEL and sixfold after pyridostigmine administration. The concomitant administration of MEL did not change the GH response to pyridostigmine. In the presence of naloxone, the GH response to MEL was completely abolished, whereas naloxone did not modify the pyridostigmine-induced GH increase. These data suggest that MEL and pyridostigmine stimulate GH secretion through a common mechanism, which is probably represented by the inhibition of somatostatin activity. However, in contrast to pyridostigmine, the action of MEL appears to be exerted through a naloxone-sensitive opioid mediation.     

"Born from the flank"--discussion concerning "cesarean section" in animals in the Talmud

We determined growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels after a 3 h infusion of escalating doses of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH(1-29)) followed by a bolus injection in hypopituitary patients with marked differences in pituitary features at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in order to evaluate further the contribution of MRI in the definition of pituitary GH reserve in GH-deficient patients. Twenty-nine patients (mean age 14.5 +/- 4.0 years) were studied. Group I comprised 13 patients: seven with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) (group Ia) and six with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) (group Ib) who had anterior pituitary hypoplasia, unidentified pituitary stalk and ectopic posterior pituitary at MRI, Group II consisted of eight patients with IGHD and small anterior pituitary/empty sella, while in group III eight had IGHD and normal morphology of the pituitary gland. Growth hormone and IGF-I levels were measured during saline infusion at 08.30-09.00 h, as well as after infusion of GHRH (1-29) at escalating doses for 3h: 0.2 micrograms/kg at 09.00-10.00 h, 0.4 micrograms/kg at 10.00-11.00 h, 0.6 micrograms/kg at 11.00-12.00 h and an intravenous bolus of 2 micrograms/ kg at 12.00 h. In the group I patients, the peak GH response to GHRH(1-29) was delayed (135-180 min) and extremely low (median 2mU/l). In group II it was delayed (135-180 min), high (median 34.8 mU/l) and persistent (median 37.4 mU/l at 185-210 min). In group III the peak response was high (median 30.8 mU/l) and relatively early (75-120 min) but it declined rapidly (median 14.4 mU/l at 185-210 min). In one group I patient, GH response increased to 34.6 mU/l. The mean basal value of IGF-I levels was significantly lower in group I (0.23 +/- 0.05 U/ml) than in groups II (0.39 +/- 0.13U/ ml, p < 0.01) and III (1.54 +/- 0.46 U/ml, p < 0.001) and did not vary significantly during the GHRH(1-29) infusion. The present study demonstrates that the impaired GH response to 3 h of continuous infusion of escalating doses of GHRH(1-29) was strikingly indicative for pituitary stalk abnormality, strengthening the case for use of GHRH in the differential diagnosis of GH deficiency. The low GH response, more severe in MPHD patients, might be dependent on the residual somatotrope cells, while the better response (34.6 mU/l) in the group Ia patients might suggest that prolonged GHRH infusion could help in evaluating the amount of residual GH pituitary tissue. Pituitary GH reserve, given the GH response to GHRH infusion in GH-deficient patients with small anterior pituitary/empty sella, seems to be maintained.     

Interrelations between sleep and the somatotropic axis

In the human as in other mammals, growth hormone (GH) is secreted as a series of pulses. In normal young adults, a major secretory episode occurs shortly after sleep onset, in temporal association with the first period of slow-wave (SW) sleep. In men, approximately 70% of the daily GH output occurs during early sleep throughout adulthood. In women, the contribution of sleep-dependent GH release to the daily output is lower and more variable. Studies involving shifts of the sleep-wake cycle have consistently shown that sleep-wake homeostasis is the primary determinant of the temporal organization of human GH release. Effects of circadian rhythmicity may occasionally be detected. During nocturnal sleep, the sleep-onset GH pulse is caused by a surge of hypothalamic GHRH release which coincides with a circadian-dependent period of relative somatostatin disinhibition. Extensive evidence indicates the existence of a consistent relationship between SW sleep and increased GH secretion and, conversely, between awakenings and decreased GH release. There is a linear relationship between amounts of SW sleep--whether measured by visual scoring or by delta activity--and amounts of concomitant GH secretion, although dissociations may occur, most likely because of variable levels of somatostatin inhibition. Pharmacological stimulation of SW sleep results in increased GH release, and compounds which increase SW sleep may therefore represent a novel class of GH secretagogues. During aging, SW sleep and GH secretion decrease with the same chronology, raising the possibility that the peripheral effects of the hyposomatotropism of the elderly may partially reflect age-related alterations in sleep-wake homeostasis. While the association between sleep and GH release has been well documented, there is also evidence indicating that components of the somatotropic axis are involved in regulating sleep. The studies are most consistent in indicating a role for GHRH in promoting NREM and/or SW sleep via central, rather than peripheral, mechanisms. A role for GH in sleep regulation is less well-documented but seems to involve REM, rather than NREM, sleep. It has been proposed that the stimulation of GH release and the promotion of NREM sleep by GHRH are two separate processes which involve GHRH neurons located in two distinct areas of the hypothalamus. Somatostatinergic control of GH release appears to be weaker during sleep than during wake, suggesting that somatostatinergic tone is lower in the hypothalamic area(s) involved in sleep regulation and sleep-related GH release than in the area controlling daytime GH secretion. While the concept of a dual control of daytime and sleep-related GH secretion remains to be directly demonstrated, it allows for the reconciliation of a number of experimental observations.     

Effects of chronic stimulation or antagonism of opiate receptors on GH secretion in male and female rats

The present study was undertaken to assess the role of endogenous opioid systems in the sexually dimorphic pattern of growth hormone (GH) secretion. To this end, male rats were treated chronically (6 to 12 h) with morphine and estrogen-exposed, ovariectomized female rats with morphine or naloxone. Chronic morphine exposure of male rats caused a 12-fold increase in basal GH levels and a modest rise in GH pulse frequency. These two changes resulted in a 3-fold increase in both mean GH concentration and total GH secretion over 6 h. In female rats, chronic morphine reduced GH pulse amplitudes but did not significantly affect other parameters of GH secretion. By contrast, chronic naloxone treatment of female rats reduced basal GH levels by 64% without affecting GH pulse amplitudes or pulse frequency. These data suggest that endogenous opioid systems are involved in the regulation of the basal GH secretion in both male and female rats.     

Pancreatic enzymes: secretion and luminal nutrient digestion in health and disease

Leptin is a hormone secreted by the adipocytes that regulates food intake and energy expenditure. It is known that growth hormone (GH) secretion is markedly influenced by body weight, being suppressed in obesity and cachexia, and recent data have demonstrated that GH release is regulated by leptin levels. Although one of the sites of action of leptin is likely to be the hypothalamus, since leptin receptor mRNA is particularly abundant in several hypothalamic nuclei, the mechanisms by which leptin regulates GH secretion are not yet known. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether leptin could act at the hypothalamic level modulating somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) expression. The administration of anti-GHRH serum (500 microl, i.v.) completely blocked leptin-induced GH release in fasting rats. In contrast, the treatment with anti-somatostatin serum (500 microl, i.v.) significantly increased GH release in this condition. Furthermore, leptin administration (10 microg, i.c.v.) to intact fasting animals reversed the inhibitory effect produced by fasting on GHRH mRNA levels in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, and increased somatostatin mRNA content in the periventricular nucleus. Finally, leptin administration (10 microgram, i.c.v.) to hypophysectomized fasting rats increased GHRH mRNA levels, and decreased somatostatin mRNA content, indicating an effect of leptin on hypothalamic GHRH- and somatostatin-producing neurons. These findings suggest a role for GHRH and somatostatin as mediators of leptin-induced GH secretion.