Important viewpoints proposed for a safety approach of HTGR reactors in Europe: Final results of the EC-funded HTR-L project

The inherent safety features of modular High Temperature Reactors (HTRs) make events leading to severe core damage highly unlikely and constitute the main differentiating aspects compared to LWRs. Furthermore, while a known and stable regulatory environment has long been established for Light Water Reactors (LWRs), different ways of thinking may help to develop a more appropriate licensing process for HTR-based power plants.The HTR-L project funded by the European Commission in the 5th Framework Programme was dedicated to the definition of a common and coherent European safety approach and the identification of the main licensing issues for the licensing framework of the modular HTRs. Several topics were developed during the course of this project.Due to the characteristics of the HTR design, it has been necessary to define specific defence-in-depth requirements which have then been evaluated for implementation in the safety approach. Safety-related functions appropriate for the HTR design have also had to be identified and listed.On one hand, the different possible solicitations of the fuel particles constituted the starting point for the identification of the accidental conditions (by means of the Master Logic Diagrams methodology); these accidental conditions were classified and the most appropriate methods to consider ultra low probability severe accidents were examined.On the other hand, the elements constituting the source term and, in particular, the requirements for the confinement of radioactive products and the conditions required to prevent the need for a “conventional” containment structure have been discussed.In the definition of the safety approach, attention has been paid to the need to maintain the potentially interesting economic perspectives of HTR reactors. Key issues to be addressed in the licensing process of the HTRs have also been identified. An innovative systems, structures and components classification method has been developed and rules that will govern equipment qualification proposed.     

CEA and AREVA R&D on HTR fuel fabrication and presentation of the CAPRI experimental manufacturing line

In the framework of the French V/HTR fuel development and qualification program, the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA) and AREVA are conducting R&D projects covering the mastering of UO₂ coated particle and fuel compact fabrication technology. To fulfill this task, a review of past knowledge, of existing technologies and a preliminary laboratory-scale work program have been conducted with the aim of retrieving the know-how on HTR coated particle and compact manufacture:

• The different stages of UO₂ kernel fabrication GSP process have been reviewed, reproduced and improved.

• The experimental conditions for the chemical vapor deposition of coatings have been defined on dummy kernels and development of innovative characterization methods has been carried out.

• Former CERCA compacting process has been reviewed and updated.

In parallel, an experimental manufacturing line for coated particles, named GAIA, and a compacting line based on former CERCA compacting experience have been designed, constructed and are in operation since early 2005 at CEA Cadarache and CERCA Romans, respectively. These two facilities constitute the CAPRI line (CEA and AREVA PRoduction Integrated line).The major objectives of the CAPRI line are:

• to recover and validate past knowledge,

• to produce representative HTR TRISO fuel meeting industrial standards,

• to permit the optimization of reference fabrication processes for kernels and coatings defined previously at a laboratory-scale and the investigation of alternative and innovative fuel design (UCO kernel, ZrC coating),

• to test alternative compact process options and

• to fabricate and characterize fuel required for irradiation and qualification purpose.

This paper presents the status of progress of R&D conducted on HTR fuel particles and compact manufacture by early 2005 and the potential of the laboratory-scale HTR fuel CAPRI line.     

Containment concepts for high temperature reactors

Different containment concepts have been proposed for High Temperature Reactors. In the paper the confinement, the gastight pressurized containment and the vented confinement are discussed. For a small HTR such as the Modul it seems to be possible to provide a vented confinement instead of a gastight containment. The German Reactor Safety Commission has given a positive statement. Due to the specific safety characteristics of the HTR the safety concepts can differ in part quite considerably from current LWR standard solutions.     

Thermal response of a modular high temperature reactor during passive cooldown under pressurized and depressurized conditions

The concept of inherent safety features of the modular HTR design with respect to passive decay heat removal through conduction, radiation and natural convection was first introduced in the German HTR-module (pebble fuel) design and subsequently extended to other modular HTR design in recent years, e.g. PBMR (pebble fuel), GT-MHR (prismatic fuel) and the new generation reactor V/HTR (prismatic fuel).This paper presents the numerical simulations of the V/HTR using the thermal-hydraulic code THERMIX which was initially developed for the analysis of HTRs with pebble fuels, verified by experiments, subsequently adopted for applications in the HTRs with prismatic fuels and checked against the results of CRP-3 benchmark problem analyzed by various countries with diverse codes.In this paper, the thermal response of the V/HTR (operating inlet/outlet temperatures 490/1000 °C) during post shutdown passive cooling under pressurized and depressurized primary system conditions has been investigated. Additional investigations have also been carried out to determine the influence of other inlet/outlet operating temperatures (e.g. 490/850, 350/850 or 350/1000 °C) on the maximum fuel and pressure vessel temperature during depressurized cooldown condition. In addition, some sensitivity analyses have also been performed to evaluate the effect of varying the parameters, i.e. decay heat, graphite conductivity, surface emissivity, etc., on the maximum fuel and pressure vessel temperature. The results show that the nominal peak fuel temperatures remain below 1600 °C for all these cases, which is the limiting temperature relating to radioactivity release from the fuel. The analyses presented in this paper demonstrate that the code THERMIX can be successfully applied for the thermal calculation of HTRs with prismatic fuel. The results also provide some fundamental information for the design optimization of V/HTR with respect to its maximum thermal power, operating temperatures, etc.     

SEMER: a simple code for the economic evaluation of nuclear and fossil energy-based power production systems

The code system, SEMER, was recently developed to evaluate the economic impact of various nuclear reactors and associated innovations. Models for nearly all fossil energy-based systems were also included to provide a basis for cost comparisons.Essentially, SEMER includes three types of model libraries: the global model, for a rapid estimation of various nuclear and fossil energy-based systems, the detailed models, for the finer cost evaluation of individual components and circuits in a PWR type of reactor and the fuel cycle models, for PWRS, HTRs and FBRs, allowing the cost estimations related to all the steps in the nuclear fuel cycle, including reprocessing and disposal.This paper summarises our on-going investigations on new developments in, and on the validation of, the SEMER system.Details of the modelling principles, and the results of validation carried out in the context of an EDF/CEA Joint Protocol Agreement, are also presented.First results of this validation are highly encouraging:

• Relative errors for the total kWh or overnight and investment costs are less than 5% for large PWR systems operating in France or other countries.

• These errors are less than 3% for small-sized compact PWRs and they are of the order of 4–7% for HTRs (as compared to IAEA estimations).

• For fossil energy-based power plants, the relative error, even with slightly different cost breakdown between SEMER and that of existing installations, is from 5 to 20%.

• Similarly, errors on the nuclear fuel cycle costs are about 1–4%, compared to published reference values.

Characteristics of corium debris bed generated in large-scale fuel-coolant interaction experiments

The formation of corium debris as the result of fuel-coolant interaction (energetic or not) has been studied experimentally in the FARO and KROTOS facilities operated at JRC-Ispra between 1991 and 1999. Experiments were performed with 3–177 kg of UO₂–ZrO₂ and UO₂–ZrO₂–Zr melts, quenched in water at depth between 1 and 2 m, and pressure between 0.1 and 5.0 MPa. The effect of various parameters such as melt composition, system pressure, water depth and subcooling on the quenching processes, debris characteristics and thermal load on bottom head were investigated, thus, giving a large palette of data for realistic reactor situations.Available data related to debris coolability aspects in particular are:

• Geometrical configuration of the collected debris.

• Partition between loose and agglomerated (“cake”) debris.

• Particle size distribution with and without energetic interaction.

These data are synthesised in the present contribution.     

Basic risk analyses for high-temperature reactors

The methodology of PSA/PRA is available for the HTR and has already been applied to various plant concepts. The results are predictive and generic in nature; the analyses have to struggle with less detailed technical information (paper design instead of real operated plants) and little experience from plant practice. The overall degree of uncertainty is similar to studies for LWRs mainly because operating experience can be transferred to some extent and the physical phenomena are much easier to describe. Therefore, the topology of design and beyond-design accidents has been established.For medium-sized HTRs (e.g. HTR-500) of current design failure of active systems for decay heat removal, resulting in core heatup, clearly dominates the risk and leads to the largest releases of radioactive nuclides into the environment. For small-sized HTRs (e.g. HTR-Module) temperature-induced releases from the fuel are insignificantly low for all types of accident; plate-out activities on the steam generator surfaces remobilized in the course of water ingress accidents can be regarded as the main contribution to the comparatively small source term.The largest releases are so low for all HTR concepts that early health effects can be ruled out in any case, including no evacuation. For small HTR plants even late cancer effects need practically not to be expected.A comparison with licensed released values has shown that the applicable current requirements are met by all HTR concepts examined. However, small HTRs especially offer an additional potential for compliance with more stringent safety requirements, “taking the fear out of hypothetical accidents”, by limiting maximum releases. Incidentally, the classically defined “risk” to the population from both plants is generally very low.     

Qualification of the LF-eddy current technique for the inspection of stainless steel cladding and applications on the reactor pressure vessel

As part of the re-inspection of the reactor pressure vessel of the nuclear power plant, the low-frequency-eddy current technique was implemented during the 1995 outage. Since then, this inspection technique and the testing equipment have seen steady further development. Therefore, optimization of the entire testing system, including qualification based on the 1995 results, was conducted. The eddy current testing system was designed as a ten-channel test system with sensors having separate transmitter and receiver coils. The first qualification of the testing technique and sensors was performed using a single-channel system; a second qualification was then carried out using the new testing electronics. The sensor design allows for a simultaneous detection of surface and subsurface flaws. This assumes that testing is performed simultaneously using four frequencies. Data analysis and evaluation are performed using a digital multi-frequency regression analysis technique The detection limits determined using this technique led to the definition of the following recording limits for testing in which the required signal-to-noise ratio of 6 dB was reliably observed.

• Detection of surface connected longitudinal and transverse flaws:

• notch, 3 mm deep and 10 mm long, for weave bead cladding;

• notch, 2 mm deep and 20 mm long, for strip weld cladding.

• Detection of embedded planar longitudinal and transverse flaws:

• ligament of 7 mm for 8 mm clad thickness and 3 mm;

• ligament for 4 mm clad thickness, notch starting at the carbon steel base material with a length of 20 mm.

• Detection of embedded volumetric longitudinal and transverse flaws:

• 3 mm diameter side-drilled hole (SDH) for 8 mm clad thickness; ligament, 4 mm. For 4 mm clad thickness: diameter, 2 mm SDH; ligament, 2 mm. All SDHs are 55 mm deep.

A look-up table for fully developed film-boiling heat transfer

An improved look-up table for film-boiling heat-transfer coefficients has been derived for steam–water flow inside vertical tubes. Compared to earlier versions of the look-up table, the following improvements were made:

• The database has been expanded significantly. The present database contains 77,234 film-boiling data points obtained from 36 sources.

• The upper limit of the thermodynamic quality range was increased from 1.2 to 2.0. The wider range was needed as non-equilibrium effects at low flows can extend well beyond the point where the thermodynamic quality equals unity.

• The surface heat flux has been replaced by the surface temperature as an independent parameter.

• The new look-up table is based only on fully developed film-boiling data.

• The table entries at flow conditions for which no data are available is based on the best of five different film-boiling prediction methods.

The new film-boiling look-up table predicts the database for fully developed film-boiling data with an overall rms error in heat-transfer coefficient of 10.56% and an average error of 1.71%. A comparison of the prediction accuracy of the look-up table with other leading film-boiling prediction methods shows that the look-up table results in a significant improvement in prediction accuracy.     

HTR-10安全负压通风系统的设计

由于高温气冷堆具有固有安全性，因此在高温气冷堆的设计中采用通风式包容体替代了密封承压式安全壳，在供暖，通风与空调（HVAC）系统中相应采用了安全负压通风系统，以保证包容体在正常工况或事故工况下都能满足与安全相关的一切功能，本文介绍了10MW高温气冷实验堆（HTR－10）安全负压通风系统的设计与评价。     

The 2006 CHF look-up table

CHF look-up tables are used widely for the prediction of the critical heat flux (CHF). The CHF look-up table is basically a normalized data bank for a vertical 8 mm water-cooled tube. The 2006 CHF look-up table is based on a database containing more than 30,000 data points and provides CHF values at 24 pressures, 20 mass fluxes, and 23 qualities, covering the full range of conditions of practical interest. In addition, the 2006 CHF look-up table addresses several concerns with respect to previous CHF look-up tables raised in the literature. The major improvements of the 2006 CHF look-up table are:

• An enhanced quality of the database (improved screening procedures, removal of clearly identified outliers and duplicate data).

• An increased number of data in the database (an addition of 33 recent data sets).

• A significantly improved prediction of CHF in the subcooled region and the limiting quality region.

• An increased number of pressure and mass flux intervals (thus increasing the CHF entries by 20% compared to the 1995 CHF look-up table).

• An improved smoothness of the look-up table (the smoothness was quantified by a smoothness index).

A discussion of the impact of these changes on the prediction accuracy and table smoothness is presented. The 2006 CHF look-up table is characterized by a significant improvement in accuracy and smoothness.     

High performance light water reactor

The objective of the high performance light water reactor (HPLWR) project is to assess the merit and economic feasibility of a high efficiency LWR operating at thermodynamically supercritical regime. An efficiency of approximately 44% is expected. To accomplish this objective, a highly qualified team of European research institutes and industrial partners together with the University of Tokyo is assessing the major issues pertaining to a new reactor concept, under the co-sponsorship of the European Commission. The assessment has emphasized the recent advancement achieved in this area by Japan. Additionally, it accounts for advanced European reactor design requirements, recent improvements, practical design aspects, availability of plant components and the availability of high temperature materials. The final objective of this project is to reach a conclusion on the potential of the HPLWR to help sustain the nuclear option, by supplying competitively priced electricity, as well as to continue the nuclear competence in LWR technology. The following is a brief summary of the main project achievements:

• A state-of-the-art review of supercritical water-cooled reactors has been performed for the HPLWR project.

• Extensive studies have been performed in the last 10 years by the University of Tokyo. Therefore, a ‘reference design’, developed by the University of Tokyo, was selected in order to assess the available technological tools (i.e. computer codes, analyses, advanced materials, water chemistry, etc.). Design data and results of the analysis were supplied by the University of Tokyo. A benchmark problem, based on the ‘reference design’ was defined for neutronics calculations and several partners of the HPLWR project carried out independent analyses. The results of these analyses, which in addition help to ‘calibrate’ the codes, have guided the assessment of the core and the design of an improved HPLWR fuel assembly.

• Preliminary selection was made for the HPLWR scale, boundary conditions, core and fuel assembly design, reactor pressure vessel, containment, turbine and balance of plant.

• A review of potentially applicable materials for the HPLWR was completed and a preliminary selection of potential in-vessel and ex-vessel candidate materials was made.

• A thorough review of heat transfer at supercritical pressures was completed together with a thermal-hydraulics analysis of potential HPLWR sub-channels. This analytical tool supports the core and fuel assembly design.

• The RELAP5 and the CATHARE 2 codes are being upgraded to supercritical pressures. Thus they can be used to support the HPLWR core design and to perform plant safety analyses.

• Assessment of the HPLWR design constraints, based on current LWR technology was documented. This document stresses the various criteria that must be satisfied in the design (e.g. material, temperature, power, safety criteria, etc.) based on experience gained in the design of PWR.

• Preliminary economic assessment concluded that the HPLWR has the potential to be economically competitive. However, an accurate assessment can only be done after the HPLWR design has been fixed. A more accurate economic assessment may be performed after the conclusion of this project.

Sea-water desalination with nuclear and other energy sources: the EURODESAL project

This paper summarises our recent investigations undertaken as part of the EURODESAL project on nuclear desalination, currently being carried out by a consortium of four European, and one Canadian, industrials and two leading EU R&D organisations.Major achievements of the project, as discussed in this paper are:

• Coherent demonstration of the technical feasibility of nuclear desalination through the elaboration of coupling schemes for optimum cogeneration of electricity and water and by exploring the unique capabilities of the innovative nuclear reactors and desalination technologies.

• Verification that the integrated system design does not adversely affect nuclear reactor safety.

• Development of codes and methods for an objective economic assessment of the competitiveness and sustainability of proposed options through comparison, in European conditions, with fossil energy based systems.

Results obtained so far seem to be quite encouraging as regards the economical viability of nuclear desalination options.Thus, for example, specific desalination costs ($/m³ of desalted water) for nuclear systems, such as the AP-600 and the French PWR-900 (reference base case), coupled to multiple effect distillation (MED) or the reverse osmosis (RO) processes, are 30–60% lower than the desalination costs for fossil energy based systems, using pulverised coal and natural gas with combined cycle, at low discount rates and recommended fossil fuel prices. Even in the most unfavourable scenarios for nuclear energy (discount rate=10%, low fossil fuel costs) desalination costs with the nuclear reactors are 7–20% lower, depending upon the desalination capacities. Furthermore, with the advanced coupling schemes, utilising waste heat from nuclear reactors, the gains in specific desalination costs of nuclear systems are increased by another 2–15%, even without system and design optimisation. A preliminary evaluation shows that desalination costs with the GT-MHR, coupled to a MED process, could still be much lower than the above nuclear options for desalting capacities≤43 000 m³ per day. This is because its design intrinsically provides “virtually free” heat at ideal temperatures for desalination (80–100 °C).     

CAST3M/ARCTURUS: A coupled heat transfer CFD code for thermal–hydraulic analyzes of gas cooled reactors

The safety of gas cooled reactors (High Temperature Reactors (HTR), Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTR) or Gas Cooled Fast Reactors (GFR)) must be ensured by systems (active or passive) which maintain loads on component (fuel) and structures (vessel, containment) within acceptable limits under accidental conditions. To achieve this objective, thermal–hydraulics computer codes are necessary tools to design, enhance the performance and ensure a high safety level of the different reactors. Some key safety questions are related to the evaluation of decay heat removal and containment pressure and thermal loads. This requires accurate simulations of conduction, convection, thermal radiation transfers and energy storage. Coupling with neutronics is also an important modeling aspect for the determination of representative parameters such as neutronics coefficient (Doppler coefficient, Moderator coeffcient, …), critical position of control rods, reactivity insertion aspects, …. For GFR, the high power density of the core and its necessary reduced dimension cannot rely only on passive systems for decay heat removal. Therefore, forced convection using active safety systems (gas blowers, heat exchangers, …) are highly recommended. Nevertheless, in case of station black-out, the safety demonstration of the concept should be guaranteed by natural circulation heat removal. This could be performed by keeping a relatively high back-up pressure for pure helium convection and also by heavy gas injection. So, it is also necessary to model mixing of different gases, the on-set of natural convection and the pressure and thermal loads onto the proximate or guard containment. In this paper, we report on the developments of the CAST3M/ARCTURUS thermal–hydraulics (Lumped Parameter and CFD) code developed at CEA, including its coupling to the neutronics code CRONOS2 and the system code CATHARE. Elementary validation cases are detailed, as well as application of the code to benchmark problems such as the HTR-10 thermal–hydraulic exercise. Examples of containment thermal–hydraulics calculations for fast reactor design (GFR) are also detailed.     

A multi-tank storage facility to effect power control in the PBMR power cycle

This article presents the concept of a storage facility used to effect power control in South Africa's PBMR power cycle. The concept features a multiple number of storage vessels whose purpose is to contain the working medium, helium, as it is withdrawn from the PBMR's closed loop power cycle, at low energy demand. This helium is appropriately replenished to the power cycle as the energy demand increases. Helium mass transfer between the power cycle and the storage facility, henceforth known as the inventory control system (ICS), is carried out by way of the pressure differential that exists between these two systems. In presenting the ICS concept, emphasis is placed on storage effectiveness; hence the discussion in this paper is centred on those features which accentuate storage effectiveness, namely:

• Storage vessel multiplicity;

• Unique initial pressures for each vessel arranged in a cascaded manner; and

• A heat sink placed in each vessel to provide thermal inertia.

Having presented the concept, the objective is to qualitatively justify the presence of each of the above-mentioned features using thermodynamics as a basis.     

The EPR: A clear step forward in dose reduction and radiation protection

For the European Pressurized Water Reactor (EPR) a large effort was made to improve the plant design with respect to radiation protection using the experience gained during the design of former generations of pressurized water reactor (PWR) in France and Germany, and their current operation. Keeping the radiation exposure of personnel to an acceptable level is one of the main objectives of the EPR design. Both the individual and the collective doses are considered.Internationally comparable limits based on recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) have been established for individual doses. These limits describe the framework within which the individual dose shall be kept as low as possible, applying the principles:

• Justification: No practice involving exposures to radiation should be adopted unless it produces sufficient benefit to the exposed individuals or to society to offset the radiation detriment it causes.

• Optimization: In relation to any particular source within a practice, the magnitude of individual doses, the number of people exposed, and the likelihood of incurring exposures where these are not certain to be received should all be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), economic and social factors being taken into account.

• Limitation: The exposure of individuals resulting from the combination of all the relevant practices is subject to dose limits.

The paper describes the design provision and measures introduced in the plant design to achieve the above described goals.They are in essence:

• measures to avoid or to reduce sources of radiation;

• layout aspects;

• provisions made in the component design with respect to ease of operation and maintenance management;

• improved possibilities of decontamination;

• use of operating experience for design improvements.

The radiation protection layout principles compiled on the basis of safe operating experience gained from the existing pressurized water reactors in France and Germany are used to develop an improved plant design with respect to radiation protection aspects and dose optimization.Summary: The European Pressurized Water Reactor is an evolutionary third-generation pressurized water reactor with a rating in the 1600 MWe class. Its development was started in 1992 by Framatome and Siemens, whose nuclear activities were combined in January 2001 to form Framatome ANP, now AREVA NP. Being the product of intense bilateral cooperation the EPR combines the technological accomplishments of the world's two leading PWR product lines—the French N4 reactors in operation at Chooz and Civeaux and the Konvoi reactors in operation at Neckarwestheim, Emsland and Isar in Germany. From the very start, development of the EPR was focused on improving plant safety and economics even further and also a large effort was made to improve the plant design with respect to radiation protection. Keeping the doses received by operating and maintenance personnel to a level far below the limiting values was one of the main objectives of the EPR design. Both the individual and the collective doses are considered in this article.     

Design and behaviour of French containments

In this report, the point is made that the French nuclear installations have two types of containments:

• - The first consisting of a pre-stressed concrete inner containment with a leakproof liner.

• - The second consisting of a pre-stressed concrete inner containment without a leaktight liner and an outer containment of reinforced concrete concentric with the former. The space between the two containments is maintained at a negative pressure, to intercept any leaks from the internal containment, which are filtered and discharged outside in the event of an accident.

After covering the mechanical design of these two types of containments, this report examines the existing safety margins for aircraft crashes and explosions resulting from the industrial environment.The report then considers in greater detail the leaktightness results of the double containments obtained during acceptance tests, as well as the leaktightness conditions while the reactor is operating.Finally, the report describes, for the case of containments with leakproof liners, the conditions of aging of the concrete and the associated pre-stressing.     

Prediction of fuel channel—graphite gas-gap behaviour in RBMK reactors

To maintain thermal contact between the fuel assembly and the graphite moderator, RBMK design reactors employ graphite split rings, which are alternatively tight on the pressure tube or tight on the graphite brick central bore. The split in the graphite rings allows a helium/nitrogen gas mixture to flow up the fuel channel. This prevents oxidation of the graphite and can be sampled to detect pressure tube leaks. The initial clearance between the rings and pressure tube or graphite brick is approximately 2.7 mm (1.35 mm each side). Due to material property changes of the pressure tubes and graphite during operation of the reactor, the size of the clearance between the rings and the pressure tube/brick, called the “gas-gap”, varies. Closure of these gaps has been identified as a possible safety case issue by reactor designers and by independent reviews carried out as part of TACIS reviews and as part of the Ignalina Safety Analysis Report. The reasons for this are that gas-gap closure would cause the pressure tube to be tightly gripped by the graphite bricks via the split rings, which could lead to:

• Extra loading on the upper pressure tube zirconium/steel transition joint, particularly during shut down and emergency transients.

• Splitting of the graphite brick, leading to loss of thermal contact between the pressure tube and graphite. As approximately 5.6% of the heat in graphite-moderated reactor is generated within the moderator through neutron and gamma-heating, loss of thermal contact would result in higher graphite temperatures, accelerating the rate of graphite expansion and hence increasing the loading of the core radial restraint.

• Graphite debris may become lodged in inter-brick gaps, leading to increased axial pressure tube loading during shut down and emergency transients.

The authors have carried out deterministic assessments based on the Ignalina RBMK-1500 reactors in Lithuania, modelling the behaviour of the graphite under irradiation and have predicted graphite bore diameter changes that are in good agreement with the measurements of graphite bore diameters taken at Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). A probabilistic model has been developed using the actual results of the deterministic calculations with non-linear graphite behaviour. Statistical analysis of the measurements of tube and graphite diameters taken from Units 1 and 2 at Ignalina NPP has been carried out. Further work has been carried out to try to determine the uncertainty inherent in the predictions of the gas-gap closure from the calculations. The overall objective of the studies is to aid prediction of the gas-gap closure process, and help to identify a suitable monitoring strategy for gas-gap closure that could be used for any RBMK reactor.     

Results of AVR fuel pebble irradiation at increased temperature and burn-up in the HFR Petten

The irradiation experiment HFR-EU1bis was performed by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre-Institute for Energy (JRC-IE) in the HFR Petten to test five spherical High Temperature Reactor (HTR) fuel pebbles of former German production with TRISO coated particles for their potential for very high temperature performance and high burn-up. The irradiation started on 9 September 2004 and was terminated on 18 October 2005 after 10 reactor cycles totaling 249 efpd and a maximum burn-up of 11.07% FIMA.The objective of the HFR-EU1bis test was to irradiate five HTR fuel pebbles at conditions beyond the characteristics of current HTR reactor designs with pebble bed cores, e.g. HTR-Modul, HTR-10 and PMBR. This should demonstrate that pebble bed HTRs are capable of enhanced performance in terms of sustainability (further increased power conversion efficiency, better use of fuel) and thus reduced waste production. The central temperature of all pebbles was kept as closely as possible at 1250 °C and held constant during the entire irradiation, with the exception of HFR downtime and power transients. This is the expected maximum central fuel temperature of a pebble bed VHTR with a coolant outlet temperature of 1000 °C.HFR-EU1bis should demonstrate the feasibility of low coated particle failure fractions under normal operating conditions and more specifically:

•

increased central fuel temperature of 1250 °C compared to 1000-1200 °C in earlier irradiation tests;

•

irradiation to a burn-up close to 16% FIMA, which is double the license limit of the HTR-Modul; due to a neutronics data processing error, the experiment was prematurely terminated at 11.07% FIMA maximum so that this objective was not fully achieved;

•

confirmation of low coated particle failure fractions due to temperature, burn-up and neutron fluence.

This paper provides the irradiation history of the experiment including data on fission gas release. Post-irradiation examinations at NRG Petten and JRC-ITU Karlsruhe included the verification of the received neutron fluences, burn-up and spectrum. They will be followed shortly by safety-relevant heating tests at JRC-ITU to verify fission product retention by out-of-pile heating tests beyond 1600 °C.