Children''s dental health in Europe. Caries treatment need in 5- and 12-year-old children from eight EU countries

An analysis of how time was used in and around 60 consultations was carried out for the purpose of exploring the relationship of time use to patient satisfaction. Sixty patients across two practice settings were surveyed, immediately following their interaction with the audiologist, regarding satisfaction with the consultation. Satisfaction was measured via: (1) a four-point scale, which yielded a satisfaction rating; and (2) a check list of satisfaction with 11 aspects of the consultation, which yielded a satisfaction score. Satisfaction ratings and scores were correlated significantly (rs = 0.76 corrected for ties, P = 0.0001). The majority of patients were either 'very satisfied' (63%) or 'satisfied' (31.6%) with the consultation experience. Temporal pictures of the consultations of 'very satisfied', 'satisfied' and 'dissatisfied' patients were clearly different. For the present sample it appeared that patient satisfaction ensued when the total consultation time was equal to or exceeded 0.6 of the sum of total consultation time and the time spent waiting at the clinic immediately prior to the consultation. Regression analyses showed that of the temporal variables studied, total consultation time (TCT) and the amount of time waiting immediately pre consultation (WT) contributed most to the variation in patient satisfaction ratings and scores. Forty-two per cent of the variance in satisfaction ratings and 36% of the variance in satisfaction scores could be explained by TCT/(WT + TCT).     

Phenotype expression of gingival fibroblasts cultured on membranes used in guided tissue regeneration

BACKGROUND: While the importance of providing individualised communication to cancer patients is now well recognised, little is known about the stability and validity of patients' expressed preferences for information and involvement in decision-making. This study explored the stability and possible predictors of such preferences over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients seeing two Medical Oncologists in an out-patient clinic at an Australian teaching hospital completed a questionnaire battery before and directly after one consultation, and before their next consultation. Eighty consecutive patients with heterogeneous cancers participated in the study. Preferences for general and specific information, involvement and support were elicited at each assessment. Locus of control and patient familiarity with the clinic were measured before the first consultation. Patient satisfaction with the consultation was assessed directly after the consultation. Demographic and disease data were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: General preferences for information and involvement were relatively stable, at least in the short term; however there was considerable variability in preferences for specific topics of information. Patients whose condition had recently worsened were more likely to want progressively less involvement in decision-making. Gender, the doctor seen and religion were also predictive of patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Situational factors, such as change in disease status, may alter a patient's preferences for information and involvement. If we wish to match the provision of information and support to the expressed needs of patients, we must ask patients at each consultation what those needs are.     

Cancer pain guidelines: are they being used? Results of a multi-site study conducted by the Hawaii Cancer Pain Initiative

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors responsible for the high demand for care from patients coming via casualty to the general medicine and paediatrics clinics at our health centre. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Primary care. Panaderas II Health Centre, Madrid. PATIENTS: All the patients attending the paediatrics and/or general medicine clinic via casualty in October 1996 were included (636). At random, 209 patients were selected from those who attended on demand. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For each patient the following variables were gathered: emergency/appointment, age, sex, room assigned, whether they asked for appointment, hour of call, type of emergency, clinic where seen, delay in appointment, assigned to which doctor's list, paediatrician/general practitioner. Being a girl was a significant risk factor in paediatrics casualty. In general practice, belonging to clinics with longer waits for an appointment and more patients per doctor (OR > 2) brought a higher risk, though not significantly, of attendance for consultation via casualty. Young people attended more frequently via casualty (chi 2 = 6.55, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in each doctor's patient list generates attendance overload and anomalous paths for consultation. Limiting accessibility of the population does not control demand and increases the route via casualty. The doctor should assess personally those urgent requests not controlled by the clerical staff. Special attention to the young is probably needed to find the causes of the increase in emergency consultations among this population group.     

Hostility, relationship quality, and health among African American couples.

Objective: This study investigated the association between hostility and health and whether it is moderated by the quality of an individual's primary romantic relationship. Method: Longitudinal data were provided by 184 African Americans, including 166 women. Participants averaged 38 years old and were married or in long-term marriagelike relationships. Hostility and relationship quality were measured at the first assessment. Hostility was based on participants' responses to items tapping cynical attitudes about relationships. Relationship quality was based on trained observer ratings of videotaped couple interactions on behavioral scales reflecting warmth, support, and communication skills. At 2 assessments approximately 5 and 7 years later, participants provided health data. Health index scores were formed from responses to five scales of the SF-12 (Ware, Kosinski, & Keller, 1998) as well as to responses to questions about the number of chronic health conditions and the number of prescribed medications. Results: Stepwise regression analyses controlling for demographic variables and the earlier health score tested the main and interactive effects of hostility and relationship quality on longitudinal changes in health. Whereas no main effects were supported, the interaction of hostility and relationship quality was significant (p     

Outpatient hysterectomy: determinants of discharge and rehospitalization in 133 patients

OBJECTIVE: This study examines our continuing experience in performing vaginal hysterectomies and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies with an outpatient protocol. The purpose was to review factors associated with discharge and hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: Surgical records from all women entering our previously reported outpatient hysterectomy protocol were reviewed. Demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative data, and postoperative data were studied, and their associations with patient discharge and hospitalization were determined. Specific attention was directed to complications. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 133 women. Twelve women (9.0%) were not discharged from the hospital and 5 (3.8%) required readmission. Surgical indications, the type of hysterectomy, and the requirement for pain medication revealed no association with hospitalization. The occurrence of an intraoperative complication (p < 0.000), the need for transfusion (p = 0.043), and postoperative antiemetics (p = 0.013) were statistically associated with hospitalization. In addition, low hematocrit values and elevated temperatures on the first and second postoperative days were associated with hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Long-term experience with outpatient hysterectomy reveals a hospitalization rate of 12.8%. Complications, blood loss, elevated temperatures, and postoperative nausea are the major determinants of patient discharge and hospitalization. Readmission rates continue to remain low.     

A simplified habit reversal treatment for pica-related chewing

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to assess the suitability of a service for provision of emergency hormonal contraception by nurses. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out of data obtained from the case records of 500 consecutive women who attended ABACUS (a city center-based family planning clinic in Liverpool, UK) for emergency contraception during the 7th and 9th months of the first year (1994) of the service. Similar data were collected for 100 consecutive women during 1 month of the third year (June 1996). The number of women who received emergency hormonal contraception was noted. In particular, details pertaining to the reasons for referral to the doctor and the trend of referrals were noted. RESULTS: The results indicate that during the first year the nurses independently issued emergency hormonal contraception to 37% of the women. They referred the remaining 63% to the medical staff. One-third of referrals were for ongoing contraception, especially oral contraception. Another third of referrals appeared to be due to 'nurse anxiety', as no medical or other cause was found for these referrals. During the third year, nurses dispensed emergency hormonal contraception to 64% of women. Among the remaining 36% of women who were referred to the doctor, 19% needed hormonal contraception. Referral reflecting 'nurse anxiety' significantly declined (1%) compared to the first year of service. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing contraception, particularly initiation of oral contraception, was one of the main reasons for referral during the first year. Referral due to 'nurse anxiety' significantly declined with continued experience and may have reflected initial anxiety and the learning curve. With increased experience over the first 2 years, the outcome of this service showed encouraging improvement. The nurses now dispense emergency hormonal contraception to a majority of women.     

Heat-shock protein expression on the membrane of T cells undergoing apoptosis

OBJECTIVE: A variety of instruments have been applied to the measurement of activity, yet few, if any, have been validated specifically for older people with chronic pain. This study has sought to examine the utility of the Human Activity Profile (HAP) for describing activity in a sample drawn from a pain clinic for older people. DESIGN: The HAP was administered to 193 older pain clinic patients, 72 of whom completed the profile on a second occasion. A further 55 responses were collected from a group of community-dwelling volunteers. The factor structure of the HAP was tested using these 320 responses. The factors subsequently derived were compared with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Barthel Index (BI). The discriminant validity of the HAP was examined by comparing factor scores for groups determined by gender, diagnosis, and status in the pain clinic. RESULTS: The 94 items of the HAP loaded onto 10 factors, which explained 63.7% of the variance. These factors demonstrated moderate associations with the BI and the subscales of the SIP. The factors discriminated between men and women (F[12.180] = 9.85. p < 0.000). Differences were also present between subjects with a musculoskeletal pain problem, postherpetic neuralgia, and pain-free volunteers (F[24.340] = 4.7. p < 0.000). Factor scores increased between pre- and postclinic assessments (F[12.60] = 4.79. p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The HAP has demonstrated qualities which favor its adoption as an activity measure for older pain clinic patients.     

Changes in health status of elderly patients following hip replacement surgery

This study investigated changes in health status following a total hip replacement among a convenience sample of 22 male and 23 female patients, all of whom had been suffering from hip dysfunction and associated arthritic pain and impaired mobility. Subjects were pretested in an orthopedic pre-admission clinic with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales questionnaire and were posttested with the same instrument 3 1/2 months after the initial contact and subsequent to hip replacement surgery. Analysis of pretest and posttest mean differences showed significant improvement in scores for pain and physical activity. No significant changes were demonstrated in the psychological and social domains of health status.     

Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment for painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy is largely symptomatic and often ineffective, with unacceptable side-effects. We tested electrical spinal-cord stimulation for the management of chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: Ten diabetic patients who did not respond to conventional treatment (mean age 51 [SD 9.3] years, six with type II diabetes, mean duration of diabetes 12 [6.3] years, mean duration of neuropathy 5 [2.1] years) were studied. The electrode was implanted in the thoracic/lumbar epidural space. Immediate neuropathic pain relief was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) after connecting the electrode, in a random order, to a percutaneous electrical stimulator or to a placebo stimulator. Exercise tolerance was assessed on a treadmill. FINDINGS: Eight subjects had statistically significant pain relief with the electrical stimulator (p < 0.02) and were therefore converted to a permanent system. Statistically significant relief of both background and peak neuropathic pain was achieved at 3 months (n = 7, p = 0.016), at 6 months (n = 7, p = 0.03), and at the end of the study (14 months, n = 7, background pain p = 0.06, peak pain p = 0.03). One patient died 2 months after the start of the study of unrelated cause while continuing to benefit from treatment and another patient ceased to benefit at 4 months. McGill pain questionnaire scores with the stimulator turned off did not change significantly from baseline scores, indicating that the severity of the underlying pain was unaltered. However, with the stimulator turned on, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in all four components of the score, by the end of the study. At the end of the study, six patients continued to gain significant pain relief and used the stimulator as the sole treatment for their neuropathic pain. For example, median background and peak pain scores at the end of study, were, respectively, 77 and 81 with the stimulator off and 23 and 20 with the stimulator on. Exercise tolerance significantly improved at 3 months (n = 7, median % increase 85 [IQR, 62-360], p = 0.015) and at 6 months (n = 6, 163 [61-425], p = 0.0007). Electrophysiological tests, vibration perception-threshold, and glycaemic control were unchanged. INTERPRETATION: Electrical spinal-cord stimulation offers a new and effective way of relieving chronic diabetic neuropathic pain and improves exercise tolerance. The technique should be considered in patients with neuropathic pain who do not respond to conventional treatment.     

Gender differences in the relation between interview-derived hostility scores and resting blood pressure

We examined the correlations between Structured Interview (SI)-derived hostility scores and resting blood pressure (BP) to see if they would be the same or different for healthy men and women. Standard risk factor information and resting BP measures were obtained from 193 undergraduates (109 men, 84 women), who underwent the SI. Subjects were rated for Potential for Hostility, Hostile Style, Intensity and Content, and completed Antagonism and Neuroticism scales. As expected, SI hostility scores were related to higher resting SBP in men, however; in women, they were related to lower resting SBP and Neuroticism. Regression analyses controlling for standard CHD risk factors indicated that SI-derived hostility predicted resting SBP and hypertensive status in both men and women, though in opposite directions. Thus, SI-derived hostility may assess a different construct in women than in men.     

Does harboring hostility hurt? Associations between hostility and pulmonary function in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults (CARDIA) study.

Objective: To examine the cross-sectional association between hostility and pulmonary function (PF) and its consistency across race/ethnicity-gender groups. Design: Data were from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults (CARDIA) cohort study (N = 4,629). Participants were recruited from 4 metropolitan areas in the United States, ages 18-30 years at baseline in 1985-1986, approximately balanced across race/ethnicity (Black, White) and gender. Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures were percent predicted values for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). Results: In full-sample multiple linear regression analyses, each 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in hostility was associated with a 0.66% decrease in FEV? (p = .0002) and a 0.60% decrease in FVC (p = .0006). This inverse association of hostility with PF remained after controlling for age, height, current socioeconomic status (SES), participant smoking status, and asthma and is more consistent than that of smoking and PF. In stratified analyses, each 1 SD increase in hostility predicted statistically significant reductions in PF for Black women, White women, and Black men. For White men, hostility showed no statistically significant relation with PF, although the pattern relating hostility to PF was similar to the pattern in the other three groups. Further, both of the post hoc three-way interaction terms for hostility, race/ethnicity, and gender predicting FEV? and FVC were nonsignificant. Conclusion: PF was inversely associated with hostility across race/ethnicity and gender, independent of age, height, current SES, smoking, and asthma. On the basis of these cross-sectional findings, the authors hypothesize that higher hostility will predict a more rapid decline in PF. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of surgical anaesthesia on the viability of nigral grafts in the rat striatum

OBJECTIVE: To compare betamethasone with placebo as an adjuvant to antibiotic therapy in the treatment of acute exudative pharyngitis. METHODS: The study was a randomized, doubled-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel, outpatient clinical trial. After consent was obtained, each patient was asked to rate his or her pain on a 10-cm numbered visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10). All of the patients received injectable benzathine penicillin. If allergic to penicillin, they were started on a 10-day course of polyenteric-coated erythromycin (PCE). Each patient was randomized to receive either i.m. betamethasone or i.m. placebo. All patients were contacted by telephone at 24 and 48 hours by one of the study investigators and asked to rate their pain based on another VAS. If their pain was not resolved by 48 hours, they were called again daily between the third and seventh days after the initial visit to determine the time of pain resolution. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were enrolled in the study, with 46 randomized to receive placebo and 46 to receive betamethasone. Eight patients were excluded from the statistical analysis because of inability to obtain follow-up. Demographic comparison showed that gender distributions, ages, mean initial pain scores, mean times to the first and second follow-up calls, and treatment regimens were similar in the 2 groups. There were significantly better pain scores for the betamethasone group at first follow-up (p = 0.0005), at second follow-up (p = 0.004), and in number of hours until relief of pain (p = 0.004). When only those patients with a positive culture for a streptococcus species were analyzed, there also were significant reductions in pain score at the first (p = 0.006) and second (p = 0.02) follow-up visits. CONCLUSION: Pain relief was greater and more rapid in patients treated with betamethasone as an adjuvant therapy in acute exudative pharyngitis.     

Selective and rapid uptake of adeno-associated virus type 2 in brain

Quality of life (QL) assessments are increasingly being included in clinical trials, but their use in clinical practice is still uncommon. The objectives of this study were to investigate the feasibility of introducing individual QL assessments into the daily routine of an out-patient oncology clinic, and the potential impact of such assessments on doctor-patient communication. The study sample included six physicians and 18 of their patients from the out-patient clinic of the Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. For each patient, three follow-up consultations were observed. The first visit was employed for the purpose of a baseline measurement. At the two subsequent visits, the patients were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30, a standardised cancer-specific QL questionnaire. The patients' responses were computer-scored and transformed into a graphic summary. The summary included current scores as well as those elicited at the previous visit. Both the physicians and the patients received a copy of the summary just prior to the medical consultation. Completing, scoring and printing the QL data could be done during waiting room time. The availability of the summary did not lengthen the average consultation time. A small increase was noted in the average number of QL issues discussed per consultation. However, the most notable trend was the increased responsibility taken by the physicians in raising specific QL issues for discussion. When the QL summary was available, the physicians raised three times as many topics than was the case prior to its use (P < 0.05). All six physicians and the majority of patients believed that the QL summary facilitated communication, and expressed interest in continued use of the procedure. The introduction of individual QL assessments in routine out-patient oncology practice is feasible and appears to stimulate physicians to inquire into specific aspects of the health and well-being of their patients. However, given the methodological limitations of this pilot study, the results should be interpreted with caution.     

Decision making by general practitioners in diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in women

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing decision making by general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women. SETTING: Two suburban London general practices. SUBJECTS: Women presenting to their family doctor with lower urinary tract symptoms. DESIGN: After each consultation the doctor completed a questionnaire on presenting symptoms; clinical examination; investigations undertaken; presence of psychological, social, and menstrual problems; patients' requests for antibiotics; antibiotic prescribing; knowledge of the patient; attitude towards the consultation; and any other factors assisting in diagnosis and management. Finally, doctors predicted the presence or absence of clinically important bacteriuria. Each woman completed a demographic questionnaire, the 12 item general health questionnaire, and the modified menstrual distress questionnaire, after which each provided a clean catch midstream urine sample. Case notes were examined for information on previous reports of results of urine analysis. RESULTS: When the general practitioners did not know the patients well they were 4.5 times more likely to assume that there was a clinically important infection. When they knew the patient well, they were four times more likely to make a correct prediction of the test result and 12 times less likely to prescribe antibiotics. Doctors were five times more likely to predict the test result correctly in patients from social classes 1 and 2 and were six times more likely to prescribe antibiotics for the older women in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: In women presenting with urinary tract symptoms, these family practitioners seemed to take no particular regard of physical, psychological, or menstrual factors in making their assessments. They were most accurate in their prediction of the result of urine analysis and least likely to prescribe antibiotics when they had a good general knowledge of the patient. Which came first, the diagnosis or prescribing, is difficult to say and probably differed in individual cases. Doctors tended to be more conservative in their management of older women and those whom they knew less well.     

Who suffers most from leg ulceration?

This study examines health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with leg ulceration and determines which patient groups are affected most by this condition. A cross-sectional study using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and age/sex-matched normal scores in patients entering six clinical audit cycles was carried out. The 758 patients included in the study (mean age 74.6 years, 64% women) had been affected by leg ulceration for a median of 10.5 months (range 0.5 to 708). Patients produced significantly higher scores than age/sex-matched normal values for all domains of the NHP, indicating poorer HRQoL (all p < 0.001). Increasing age led to greater deficits in energy (p < 0.001) and mobility (p < 0.001) with greater social isolation (p = 0.044). Women experienced poorer energy, sleep patterns, mobility and emotional reactions (all p < 0.001), and increased physical pain and social isolation (p < 0.05) compared to men. However, higher scores may be expected for older women based on age/sex-matched normal values. After adjustment for age/sex-matched normal values, it was the younger patients who experienced a greater deficit in HRQoL over all domains of the NHP, with men scoring higher than women in the domains of bodily pain, sleep and social isolation (p < 0.001) and energy (p = 0.015). Leg ulceration has a major impact on patients' HRQoL as detected by the NHP. The excess in scores compared with age/sex-matched normal values indicate that it is younger male patients in whom ulceration makes a greater impact on HRQoL.     

Effects of time-in-clinic, clinic setting, and faculty supervision on the continuity clinic experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of setting, type of supervision, and time in clinic on the resident continuity clinic experience. DESIGN: Prospective cohort with preintervention and postintervention measures. SETTINGS: Pediatric residents selected one of three clinic settings for their continuity clinic experience. These included a traditional, university-based clinic, private practice offices, and publicly funded community-based clinics. SUBJECTS: All pediatric residents at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, July 1985 through June 1991. INTERVENTIONS: Using varied clinic sites, matching residents one or two to one with preceptors for their continuity clinic, increasing continuity clinic from 1 to 2 half-days per week. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Residents in private offices had the most varied experience, seeing more patients, more acute care, and a broader age range of patients than residents at other sites. They were more likely both to be observed by their preceptors during patient visits and to observe their preceptors delivering care. Because the number of patients seen per session rose, increasing continuity clinic time from one to two half-days per week more than doubled the number of patients seen per week. Increased time away from hospital did not affect scores on the Pediatric In-Training Examination. While test scores were similar for incoming residents, those in private offices scored higher on the final Behavioral Pediatrics Examination (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinic setting, time in clinic, and faculty supervision affect the quality of the continuity clinic experience. Increased time in clinic resulted in a broader exposure to patients. Residents placed in private offices had a more varied patient mix, were more closely supervised, and seemed to gain primary care skills more rapidly than residents at other sites.     

What constitutes cerebral palsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a newly developed disability scale for patients with neck pain demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. METHODS: Testing was conducted using three different samples of patients with neck pain (n = 162). Test-retest reliability of the scale was carried out on the same day with one sample (n = 39), and between-day reliability was carried out with another (n = 21). Differential item functioning with regard to the influence of gender and age was carried out with these two patient groups, as was construct validity. Responsiveness was measured using patients participating in a clinical trial involving patients with chronic neck pain (n = 102). Additionally, scale scores were compared with a wide range of physical measurements using the patients in the clinical trial. RESULTS: Short-term, between-day and postal questionnaire reliability coefficients were all extremely high. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency was 0.9 for the entire scale, and the coefficients for individual items were all greater than 0.88. Disability scale scores correlated strongly to pain scores as well as to doctor and patient global assessments, indicating good construct validity. Relative changes in disability scores demonstrated a moderately strong correlation to changes in pain scores after treatment. Scale scores correlated weakly to all physical measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The disability scale demonstrated excellent practicality and reliability. The scale accurately reflects patient perceptions regarding functional status and pain as well as doctor's global assessment and is responsive to change over long periods of time. We feel that this scale can be a valuable tool for the assessment of patients in future clinical trials and quality of care studies.