联合循环参数和系统结构优化研究

研究了如何提高余热锅炉型三压再热联合循环系统的效率,应用分析的方法建立了系统效率数学模型,以联合循环系统效率最高作为系统性能的评判标准。在亚临界范围内,对余热锅炉的蒸汽参数进行了优化;针对余热锅炉进气温度对余热锅炉性能的影响进行分析,在此基础上提出燃气轮机排气部分回热利用,并研究了回热利用对联合循环效率的影响。计算结果表明:经余热锅炉优化和排气部分回热利用,在基本负荷下,PG9351FA机组的联合循环热效率可提高1.33%;在75%和50%的负荷下,效率分别提高2.11%和4.17%;而具有再热的GT26机组热效率高达60.73%。     

On some perspectives for increasing the efficiency of combined cycle power plants

The paper proposes an analysis of some possibilities to increase the combined cycle plant efficiency to values higher than the 60% without resorting to a new gas turbine technology. Optimization of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with the use of parallel sections and of limit subcritical conditions (up to 220 bar) is the key elements to obtain this result.The HRSG optimization is sufficient to obtain combined cycle plant efficiencies of the order of 60% while, joining HRSG optimization with the use of gas turbine reheat (postcombustion) and gas to gas recuperation can lead the efficiency of the whole plant to the limit value of 65%. Results are proposed with reference to a turbine inlet temperature of 1500 K, corresponding to those of usual commercial D–F series gas turbine.     

Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system

This paper has proposed an improved liquefied natural gas (LNG) fuelled combined cycle power plant with a waste heat recovery and utilization system. The proposed combined cycle, which provides power outputs and thermal energy, consists of the gas/steam combined cycle, the subsystem utilizing the latent heat of spent steam from the steam turbine to vaporize LNG, the subsystem that recovers both the sensible heat and the latent heat of water vapour in the exhaust gas from the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) by installing a condensing heat exchanger, and the HRSG waste heat utilization subsystem. The conventional combined cycle and the proposed combined cycle are modelled, considering mass, energy and exergy balances for every component and both energy and exergy analyses are conducted. Parametric analyses are performed for the proposed combined cycle to evaluate the effects of several factors, such as the gas turbine inlet temperature (TIT), the condenser pressure, the pinch point temperature difference of the condensing heat exchanger and the fuel gas heating temperature on the performance of the proposed combined cycle through simulation calculations. The results show that the net electrical efficiency and the exergy efficiency of the proposed combined cycle can be increased by 1.6 and 2.84% than those of the conventional combined cycle, respectively. The heat recovery per kg of flue gas is equal to 86.27 kJ s^?1. One MW of electric power for operating sea water pumps can be saved. The net electrical efficiency and the heat recovery ratio increase as the condenser pressure decreases. The higher heat recovery from the HRSG exit flue gas is achieved at higher gas TIT and at lower pinch point temperature of the condensing heat exchanger. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Analysis and cost optimization of the triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat gas‐recuperated combined power cycle

Increasing the inlet temperature of gas turbine (TIT) and optimization are important methods for improving the efficiency and power of the combined cycle. In this paper, the triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat recuperated combined cycle (the Regular Gas‐Reheat cycle) was optimized relative to its operating parameters, including the temperature differences for pinch points (δT_PP). The optimized triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat recuperated combined cycle (the Optimized cycle) had much lower δT_PP than that for the Regular Gas‐Reheat cycle so that the area of heat transfer of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) of the Optimized cycle had to be increased to keep the same rate of heat transfer. For the same mass flow rate of air, the Optimized cycle generates more power and consumes more fuel than the Regular Gas‐Reheat cycle. An objective function of the net additional revenue (the saving of the optimization process) was defined in terms of the revenue of the additional generated power and the costs of replacing the HRSG and the additional fuel. Constraints were set on many operating parameters such as the minimum temperature difference for pinch points (δT_PPm), the steam turbines inlet temperatures and pressures, and the dryness fraction at steam turbine outlet. The net additional revenue was optimized at 11 different maximum values of TIT using two different methods: the direct search and variable metric. The performance of the Optimized cycle was compared with that for the Regular Gas‐Reheat cycle and the triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat recuperated reduced‐irreversibility combined cycle (the Reduced‐Irreversibility cycle). The results indicate that the Optimized cycle is 0.17–0.35 percentage point higher in efficiency and 5.3–6.8% higher in specific work than the Reduced‐Irreversibility cycle, which is 2.84–2.91 percentage points higher in efficiency and 4.7% higher in specific work than the Regular Gas‐Reheat cycle when all cycles are compared at the same values of TIT and δT_PPm. Optimizing the net additional revenue could result in an annual saving of 33.7 million US dollars for a 481 MW power plant. The Optimized cycle was 3.62 percentage points higher in efficiency than the most efficient commercially available H‐system combined cycle when compared at the same value of TIT. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat, gas recuperation, and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator

The main methods for improving the efficiency or power of the combined cycle are: increasing the inlet temperature of the gas turbine (TIT), inlet air-cooling, applying gas reheat, steam or water injection into the gas turbine (GT), and reducing the irreversibility of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). In this paper, gas reheat with recuperation was applied to the regular triple-pressure steam-reheat combined cycle (the Regular cycle) by replacing the GT unit with a recuperated gas-reheat GT unit (requires two gas turbines, gas recuperator, and two combustion chambers). The Regular cycle with gas-reheat and gas-recuperation (the Regular Gas Reheat cycle) was modeled including detailed modeling of the combustion and GT cooling processes and a feasible technique to reduce the irreversibility of its HRSG was introduced. The Regular Gas Reheat cycle and the Regular Gas Reheat cycle with reduced-irreversibility HRSG (the Reduced Irreversibility cycle) were compared with the Regular cycle, which is the typical design for a commercial combined cycle. The effects of varying the TIT on the performances of all cycles were presented and discussed. The results indicate that the Reduced Irreversibility cycle is 1.9–2.15 percentage points higher in efficiency and 3.5% higher in the total specific work than the Regular Gas Reheat cycle, which is 3.3–3.6 percentage points higher in efficiency and 22–26% higher in the total specific work than the Regular cycle. The Regular Gas Reheat and Reduced Irreversibility cycles are 1.18 and 3.16 percentage points; respectively, higher in efficiency than the most efficient commercially-available combined cycle at the same value of TIT. Economic analysis was performed and showed that applying gas reheat with recuperation to the Regular cycle could result in an annual saving of 10.2 to 11.2 million US dollars for a 339 MW to 348 MW generating unit using the Regular cycle and that reducing the irreversibility of the HRSG of the Regular Gas Reheat cycle could result in an additional annual saving of 11.8 million US dollars for a 439 MW generating unit using the Regular Gas Reheat cycle.     

Energy and exergy analyses of a CFB‐based indirectly fired combined cycle power generation system

Combined cycle configuration has the ability to use the waste heat from the gas turbine exhaust gas using the heat recovery steam generator for the bottoming steam cycle. In the current study, a natural gas‐fired combined cycle with indirectly fired heating for additional work output is investigated for configurations with and without reheat combustor (RHC) in the gas turbine. The mass flow rate of coal for the indirect‐firing mode in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustor is estimated based on fixed natural gas input for the gas turbine combustion chamber (GTCC). The effects of pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, inlet temperatures to the air compressor and to the GTCC on the overall cycle performance of the combined cycle configuration are analysed. The combined cycle efficiency increases with pressure ratio up to the optimum value. Both efficiency and net work output for the combined cycle increase with gas turbine inlet temperature. The efficiency decreases with increase in the air compressor inlet temperature. The indirect firing of coal shows reduced use with increase in the turbine inlet temperature due to increase in the use of natural gas. There is little variation in the efficiency with increase in GTCC inlet temperature resulting in increased use of coal. The combined cycle having the two‐stage gas turbine with RHC has significantly higher efficiency and net work output compared with the cycle without RHC. The exergetic efficiency also increases with increase in the gas turbine inlet temperature. The exergy destruction is highest for the CFB combustor followed by the GTCC. The analyses show that the indirectly fired mode of the combined cycle offers better performance and opportunities for additional net work output by using solid fuels (coal in this case). Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

9FA型燃气轮机联合循环性能研究

1引言西气东输工程促进了沿线燃气轮机联合循环电厂的建设,减轻了中东部地区的环境排放压力。燃气轮机联合循环发电系统高效低污染、启停迅速、调峰能力强。西气东输管道沿线有25台F级燃气轮机联合循环机组,其中GE公司9FA型燃气轮机联合循环发电机组13台。如何保证系统的稳定安     

Cost numerical optimization of the triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat gas‐recuperated combined power cycle that uses steam for cooling the first GT

Optimization is an important method for improving the efficiency and power of the combined cycle. In this paper, the triple‐pressure steam‐reheat gas‐reheat gas‐recuperated combined cycle that uses steam for cooling the first gas turbine (the regular steam‐cooled cycle) was optimized relative to its operating parameters. The optimized cycle generates more power and consumes more fuel than the regular steam‐cooled cycle. An objective function of the net additional revenue (the saving of the optimization process) was defined in terms of the revenue of the additional generated power and the costs of replacing the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and the costs of the additional operation and maintenance, installation, and fuel. Constraints were set on many operating parameters such as air compression ratio, the minimum temperature difference for pinch points (δT_ppm), the dryness fraction at steam turbine outlet, and stack temperature. The net additional revenue and cycle efficiency were optimized at 11 different maximum values of turbine inlet temperature (TIT) using two different methods: the direct search and the variable metric. The optima were found at the boundaries of many constraints such as the maximum values of air compression ratio, turbine outlet temperature (TOT), and the minimum value of stack temperature. The performance of the optimized cycles was compared with that for the regular steam‐cooled cycle. The results indicate that the optimized cycles are 1.7–1.8 percentage points higher in efficiency and 4.4–7.1% higher in total specific work than the regular steam‐cooled cycle when all cycles are compared at the same values of TIT and δT_ppm. Optimizing the net additional revenue could result in an annual saving of 21 million U.S. dollars for a 439 MW power plant. Increasing the maximum TOT to 1000°C and replacing the stainless steel recuperator heat exchanger of the optimized cycle with a super‐alloys‐recuperated heat exchanger could result in an additional efficiency increase of 1.1 percentage point and a specific work increase of 4.8–7.1%. The optimized cycles were about 3.3 percentage points higher in efficiency than the most efficient commercially available H‐system combined cycle when compared at the same value of TIT. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Modeling,numerical optimization,and irreversibility reduction of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle

The main methods for improving the efficiency of the combined cycle are: increasing the inlet temperature of the gas turbine (TIT), reducing the irreversibility of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), and optimization. In this paper, modeling and optimization of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle as well as irreversibility reduction of its HRSG are considered. Constraints were set on the minimum temperature difference for pinch points (PP_m), the temperature difference for superheat approach, the steam turbine inlet temperature and pressure, the stack temperature, and the dryness fraction at steam turbine outlet. The triple-pressure reheat combined cycle was optimized at 41 different maximum values of TIT using two different methods; the direct search and the variable metric. A feasible technique to reduce the irreversibility of the HRSG of the combined cycle was introduced. The optimized and the reduced-irreversibility triple-pressure reheat combined cycles were compared with the regularly designed triple-pressure reheat combined cycle, which is the typical design for a commercial combined cycle. The effects of varying the TIT on the performance of all cycles were presented and discussed. The results indicate that the optimized triple-pressure reheat combined cycle is up to 1.7% higher in efficiency than the reduced-irreversibility triple-pressure reheat combined cycle, which is 1.9–2.1% higher in efficiency than the regularly designed triple-pressure reheat combined cycle when all cycles are compared at the same values of TIT and PP_m. The optimized and reduced-irreversibility combined cycles were compared with the most efficient commercially available combined cycle at the same value of TIT.     

Optimization of heat recovery steam generator through exergy analysis for combined cycle gas turbine power plants

This paper proposes a new approach to finding the optimum design parameters of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) system to maximize the efficiency of the steam turbine (bottom) cycle of the combined cycle power plant (CCPP), but without performing the bottom cycle analysis. This could be achieved by minimizing the unavailable exergy (the sum of the destroyed and the lost exergies) resulted from the heat transfer process of the HRSG system. The present approach is relatively simple and straightforward because the process of the trial-and-error method, typical in performing the bottom cycle analysis for the system optimization, could be avoided. To demonstrate the usefulness of the present method, a single-stage HRSG system was chosen, and the optimum evaporation temperature was obtained corresponding to maximum useful work for given conditions of water and gas temperatures at the inlets of the HRSG system. Results show that the optimum evaporation temperature obtained based on the present exergy analysis appears similar to that based on the bottom cycle analysis. Also shown is the dependency of number of transfer unit (NTU) on the evaporation temperature, which is another important factor in determining the optimum condition when the construction cost is taken into account in addition to the operating cost. The present approach turned out to be a powerful tool for optimization of the single-stage HRSG systems and can easily be extended to multi-stage systems. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Performance evaluation of a combined power generation system integrated with thermochemical exhaust heat recuperation based on steam methane reforming

The present paper applies the thermodynamic analysis with the determining the efficiency of a combined cycle power plant with a chemically recuperated gas turbine. Thermochemical recuperation of exhaust heat after a gas turbine is realized via the steam methane reforming process. The main concept of combined cycle power plant (CCPP) with chemically recuperated gas turbine (CRGT) is based on the use of exhaust heat for endothermic reforming of the original hydrocarbon fuel in a reformer and for steam generation for a steam cycle. To understand the effect of operating variables such as temperature, pressure, and steam-to-methane ratio on the overall efficiency, the energy and mass balances were compiled. The energy flows were represented by a Sankey diagram. The results of the thermodynamic analysis show that efficiency of CCPP with CRGT is significantly higher (4–7%) than efficiency of CCPP with a conventional gas turbine without TCR. Maximum efficiency of CCPP with CRGT of 0.6412 is observed at inlet temperature of working gas of 1600 °C, pressure of 23 bar for a steam-to-methane ratio of 3.0. In the temperature of inlet working gas below 1200 °C the increase in the efficiency of CCPP with TCR is less than 2%.     

Influence of the heat recovery steam generator design parameters on the thermoeconomic performances of combined cycle gas turbine power plants

This paper proposes a methodology to identify the most relevant design parameters that impact on the thermal efficiency and the economic results of combined cycle gas turbine power plants. The analysis focuses on the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) design and more specifically on those operating parameters that have a direct influence on the economic results of the power plant. These results are obtained both at full and part load conditions using a dedicated code capable of simulating a wide number of different plant configurations. Two different thermoeconomic models aimed to select the best design point are proposed and compared: the first one analyzes the generating cost of the energy while the second one analyzes the annual cash flow of the plant. Their objective is to determine whether an increase in the investment in order to improve the thermal efficiency is worth from an economic point of view. Both models and the different HRSG configurations analysed are compared in the results section. Some parametric analysis show how the design parameters might be varied in order to improve the power plant efficiency or the economic results. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Improvement of part load efficiency of a combined cycle power plant provisioning ancillary services

According to the type of ancillary service provisioned, operation mode of a power plant may change to part load operation. In this contribution, part load operation is understood as delivering a lower power output than possible at given ambient temperature because of gas turbine power output control. If it is economically justified, a power plant may operate in the part load mode for longer time. Part load performance of a newly built 80 MW combined cycle in Slovakia was studied in order to assess the possibilities for fuel savings. Based on online monitoring data three possibilities were identified: condensate preheating by activation of the currently idle hot water section; change in steam condensing pressure regulation strategy; and the most important gas turbine inlet air preheating. It may seem to be in contradiction with the well proven concept of gas turbine inlet air cooling, which has however been developed for boosting the gas turbine cycles in full load operation. On the contrary, in a combined cycle in the part load operation mode, elevated inlet air temperature does not affect the part load operation of gas turbines but it causes more high pressure steam to be raised in HRSG, which leads to higher steam turbine power output. As a result, less fuel needs to be combusted in gas turbines in order to achieve the requested combined cycle’s power output. By simultaneous application of all three proposals, more than a 2% decrease in the power plant’s natural gas consumption can be achieved with only minor capital expenses needed.     

Study of a deaerator location in triple-pressure reheat combined power cycle

Deaerator is an essential open feed water heater in the steam bottoming cycle to improve the efficiency and also to remove the dissolved gasses from the feed water. Heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) plays a key role on the performance of the combined cycle (CC). In this work, attention has been focused to improve the performance of a triple pressure (TP) CC with a deaerator location. In this work, two options for deaerator location, one at condenser (deaerator–condenser) and the other in between low pressure (LP) and intermediate pressure (IP) heaters have been studied to increase the heat recovery from the gas turbine exhaust. The compressor pressure ratio is not fixed initially and evaluated from HRSG inlet condition. The LP and IP in HRSG have been evaluated from the local flue gas temperature to get the minimum possible temperature difference in the heaters. The results show that the deaerator placed in between the LP and IP heaters, gives high efficiency compared to a deaerator–condenser arrangement. The optimum conditions for the HRSG, deaerator and steam reheater are evaluated through the thermodynamic study. The results are validated by comparing with the published results.     

Comparative performance analysis of cogeneration gas turbine cycle for different blade cooling means

The paper compares the thermodynamic performance of MS9001 gas turbine based cogeneration cycle having a two-pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) for different blade cooling means. The HRSG has a steam drum generating steam to meet coolant requirement, and a second steam drum generates steam for process heating. Gas turbine stage cooling uses open loop cooling or closed loop cooling schemes. Internal convection cooling, film cooling and transpiration cooling techniques employing steam or air as coolants are considered for the performance evaluation of the cycle. Cogeneration cycle performance is evaluated using coolant flow requirements, plant specific work, fuel utilisation efficiency, power-to-heat-ratio, which are function of compressor pressure ratio and turbine inlet temperature, and process steam drum pressure. The maximum and minimum values of power-to-heat ratio are found with steam internal convection cooling and air internal convection cooling respectively whereas maximum and minimum values of fuel utilisation efficiency are found with steam internal convection cooling and closed loop steam cooling. The analysis is useful for power plant designers to select the optimum compressor pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature, fuel utilisation efficiency, power-to-heat ratio, and appropriate cooling means for a specified value of plant specific work and process heating requirement.     

The effect of elevated inlet air temperature and relative humidity on cogeneration system

The effect of elevated inlet air temperature and relative humidity on a gas turbine (GT) cogeneration system performance was investigated. The analysis was carried out on a GT of a capacity 171 MW at ISO condition, which is integrated with a dual pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), the cogeneration system had been tested under Kuwait summer climate conditions. A computational model was developed and solved using engineering equation solver professional package to investigate the performance of a dual pressure GT‐HRSG system. The suggested HRSG is capable of producing high‐pressure superheated steam at 150 bar and 510°C to operate a power generation steam turbine cycle, and a medium pressure saturated steam at 15 bar to run a thermal vapor compression (TVC) desalination system. In this research, the influence of elevated inlet air temperature and relative humidity on the energy assessment of the suggested cogeneration system was thoroughly investigated. Results indicated that operating GT under elevated values of inlet air temperatures is characterized by low values of net power and thermal efficiency. At elevated inlet air temperatures, increasing relative humidity has a small positive impact on GT cycle net power and thermal efficiency. Integrating the GT with HRSG to generate steam for power generation and process heat tends to increase energy utilization factor of the system at elevated inlet air temperatures. Increasing inlet air temperature plays a negative impact on power to heat ratio (PHR), while relative humidity has no effect on PHR. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Analysis of parameters affecting the performance of gas turbines and combined cycle plants with vapor absorption inlet air cooling

The integration of an aqua‐ammonia inlet air‐cooling scheme to a cooled gas turbine‐based combined cycle has been analyzed. The heat energy of the exhaust gas prior to the exit of the heat recovery steam generator has been chosen to power the inlet air‐cooling system. Dual pressure reheat heat recovery steam generator is chosen as the combined cycle configuration. Air film cooling has been adopted as the cooling technique for gas turbine blades. A parametric study of the effect of compressor–pressure ratio, compressor inlet temperature, turbine inlet temperature, ambient relative humidity, and ambient temperature on performance parameters of plants has been carried out. It has been observed that vapor absorption inlet air cooling improves the efficiency of gas turbine by upto 7.48% and specific work by more than 18%, respectively. However, on the adoption of this scheme for combined cycles, the plant efficiency has been observed to be adversely affected, although the addition of absorption inlet air cooling results in an increase in plant output by more than 7%. The optimum value of compressor inlet temperature for maximum specific work output has been observed to be 25 °C for the chosen set of conditions. Further reduction of compressor inlet temperature below this optimum value has been observed to adversely affect plant efficiency. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Parametric analysis of a coal based combined cycle power plant

In the present paper thermodynamic analyses, i.e. both energy and exergy analyses have been conducted for a coal based combined cycle power plant, which consists of pressurized circulating fluidized bed (PCFB) partial gasification unit and an atmospheric circulating fluidized bed (ACFB) char combustion unit. Dual pressure steam cycle is considered for the bottoming cycle to reduce irreversibilities during heat transfer from gas to water/steam. The effect of operating variables such as pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature on the performance of combined cycle power plant has been investigated. The pressure ratio and maximum temperature (gas turbine inlet temperature) are identified as the dominant parameters having impact on the combined cycle plant performance. The work output of the topping cycle is found to increase with pressure ratio, while for the bottoming cycle it decreases. However, for the same gas turbine inlet temperature the overall work output of the combined cycle plant increases up to a certain pressure ratio, and thereafter not much increase is observed. The entropy generation, the irreversibilities in each component of the combined cycle and the exergy destruction/losses are also estimated. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Exergy and Energy Analysis of Combined Cycle systems with Different Bottoming Cycle Configurations

The paper deals with thermodynamic analysis of cooled gas turbine‐based gas‐steam combined cycle with single, dual, or triple pressure bottoming cycle configuration. The cooled gas turbine analyzed here uses air as blade coolant. Component‐wise non‐dimensionalized exergy destruction of the bottoming cycle has been quantified with the objective to identify the major sources of exergy destruction. The mass of steam generated in different configurations of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) depends upon the number of steam pressure drums, desired pressure level, and steam temperature. For the selected set of operating parameters, maximum steam has been observed to be generated in the case of triple pressure HRSG = 19 kg/kg and minimum in single pressure HRSG = 17.25 kg/kg. Plant‐efficiency and plant‐specific works are both highest for triple‐pressure bottoming cycle combined cycle. Non‐dimensionalized exergy destruction in HRSG is least at 0.9% for B3P, whereas 1.23% for B2P, and highest at 3.2% for B1P illustrating that process irreversibility is least in the case of B3P and highest in B1P. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Modeling and optimization of a novel pressurized CHP system with water extraction and refrigeration

A novel cooling, heat, and power (CHP) system has been proposed that features a semi-closed Brayton cycle with pressurized recuperation, integrated with a vapor absorption refrigeration system (VARS). The semi-closed Brayton cycle is called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE). The VARS interacts with the HPRTE power cycle through heat exchange in the generator and the evaporator. Waste heat from the recirculated combustion gas of the HPRTE is used to power the absorption refrigeration unit, which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient conditions and also produces excess refrigeration in an amount that depends on ambient conditions. Water produced as a product of combustion is intentionally condensed in the evaporator of the VARS, which is designed to provide sufficient cooling for the inlet air to the high-pressure compressor, water extraction, and for an external cooling load. The computer model of the combined HPRTE/VARS cycle predicts that with steam blade cooling and a medium-sized engine, the cycle will have a thermal efficiency of 49% for a turbine inlet temperature of 1400°C. This thermal efficiency, is in addition to the large external cooling load, generated in the combined cycle, which is 13% of the net work output. In addition, it also produces up to 1.4 kg of water for each kg of fuel consumed, depending upon the fuel type. When the combined HPRTE/VARS cycle is optimized for maximum thermal efficiency, the optimum occurs for a broad range of operating conditions. Details of the multivariate optimization procedure and results are presented in this paper. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.