Comparison of 2 protocols to increase circulating progesterone concentration before timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows with or without elevated body temperature

Two treatments designed to increase circulating progesterone concentration (P4) during preovulatory follicle development were compared. One treatment used 2 intravaginal P4 implants (controlled internal drug-releasing inserts; CIDR) and the other used a GnRH treatment at beginning of the protocol. Lactating Holstein cows that had been diagnosed as nonpregnant were randomly assigned to receive timed artificial insemination (TAI) following 1 of 2 treatments (n = 1,638 breedings): (1) GnRH: CIDR+ 2 mg of estradiol (E2) benzoate + 100 µg of GnRH on d ?11, PGF_2α on d ?4, CIDR withdrawal + 1.0 mg of E2-cypionate + PGF_2α) on d ?2, and TAI on d 0; or (2) 2CIDR: 2 CIDR + 2 mg of E2-benzoate on d ?11, 1 CIDR withdrawn + PGF_2α on d ?4, second CIDR withdrawn + 1.0 mg of E2-cypionate + PGF_2α on d ?2, and TAI on d 0. Milk yield was measured daily between d 0 and d 7. Rectal temperature was measured using a digital thermometer at d 0 and 7, and elevated body temperature was defined as an average rectal temperature ≥39.1°C. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60 after TAI. We detected no effect of treatments on pregnancy per AI or pregnancy loss regardless of elevated body temperature, body condition score, parity, milk yield, or presence or absence of a corpus luteum (CL) on d ?11 or d ?4. Pregnancy per AI at 60 d was reduced [elevated body temperature = 22.8% (162/709), no elevated body temperature 34.1% (279/817)] and pregnancy loss tended to increase [elevated body temperature = 20.2% (41/203), no elevated body temperature 14.4% (47/326)] in cows with elevated body temperature. Various physiological measurements associated with greater fertility were also reduced in cows with elevated body temperature, such as percentage of cows with a CL at PGF_2α (decreased 7.9%), ovulatory follicle diameter (decreased 0.51 mm), expression of estrus (decreased 5.1%), and ovulation near TAI (decreased 2.8%) compared with cows without elevated body temperature. A greater proportion of cows (30.2%) had a CL at PGF_2α in the GnRH treatment [74.1% (570/763)] than in the 2CIDR treatment [56.9% (434/763)]; however, circulating P4 concentration was greater at the time of PGF_2α treatment (d ?4) for cows 2CIDR (4.26 ± 0.13 ng/mL) than in cows in GnRH (3.99 ± 0.14 ng/mL). Thus, these 2 protocols yield similar fertility results that might be due to somewhat different physiological alterations. Treatment with GnRH increased the proportion of cows with a CL at PGF_2α; however, the 2CIDR protocol increased circulating P4 under all circumstances.     

Increasing length of an estradiol and progesterone timed artificial insemination protocol decreases pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows

Our hypothesis was that increasing the length of an estradiol and progesterone (P4) timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol would improve pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 759) yielding 31 ± 0.30 kg of milk/d with a detectable corpus luteum (CL) at d −11 were randomly assigned to receive TAI (d 0) following 1 of 2 treatments: (8d) d −10 = controlled internal drug release (CIDR) and 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate, d −3 = PGF_2α(25 mg of dinoprost tromethamine), d −2 = CIDR removal and 1.0 mg of estradiol cypionate, d 0 = TAI; or (9d) d −11 = CIDR and estradiol benzoate, d −4 = PGF_2α, d −2 CIDR removal and estradiol cypionate, d 0 TAI. Cows were considered to have their estrous cycle synchronized in response to the protocol by the absence of a CL at artificial insemination (d 0) and presence of a CL on d 7. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60. The ovulatory follicle diameter at TAI (d 0) did not differ between treatments (14.7 ± 0.39 vs. 15.0 ± 0.40 mm for 8 and 9 d, respectively). The 9d cows tended to have greater P4 concentrations on d 7 in synchronized cows (3.14 ± 0.18 ng/mL) than the 8d cows (3.05 ± 0.18 ng/mL). Although the P/AI at d 32 [45 (175/385) vs. 43.9% (166/374) for 8d and 9d, respectively] and 60 [38.1 (150/385) vs. 40.4% (154/374) for 8d and 9d, respectively] was not different, the 9d cows had lower pregnancy losses [7.6% (12/166)] than 8d cows [14.7% (25/175)]. The cows in the 9d program were more likely to be detected in estrus [72.0% (269/374)] compared with 8d cows [62% (240/385)]. Expression of estrus improved synchronization [97.4 (489/501) vs. 81% (202/248)], P4 concentrations at d 7 (3.22 ± 0.16 vs. 2.77 ± 0.17 ng/mL), P/AI at d 32 [51.2 (252/489) vs. 39.4% (81/202)], P/AI at d 60 [46.3 (230/489) vs. 31.1% (66/202)], and decreased pregnancy loss [9.3 (22/252) vs. 19.8% (15/81)] compared with cows that did not show estrus, respectively. Cows not detected in estrus with small (<11 mm) or large follicles (>17 mm) had greater pregnancy loss; however, in cows detected in estrus, no effect of follicle diameter on pregnancy loss was observed. In conclusion, increasing the length of the protocol for TAI increased the percentage of cows detected in estrus and decreased pregnancy loss.     

Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination

The objective was to determine if using a Double-Ovsynch protocol [DO; Pre-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-3 d-GnRH, 7 d later Breeding-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-timed artificial insemination (TAI)] to resynchronize ovulation after a previous TAI would increase synchrony and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with an Ovsynch protocol initiated 32 d after TAI (D32; GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI). Lactating Holstein cows at various days in milk and prior AI services were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to resynchronization treatments. All DO cows received the first GnRH injection of Pre-Resynch 22 d after TAI, and cows (n=981) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal ultrasonography 29 d after TAI continued the protocol. Pregnancy status for all D32 cows was evaluated 29 d after TAI so fertility and pregnancy loss could be compared with that of DO cows. All D32 cows received the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch 32 d after TAI, and cows (n=956) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal palpation 39 d after TAI continued the protocol. In a subgroup of cows from each treatment, ultrasonography (n=751) and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations (n=743) were used to determine the presence of a functional corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation to the first GnRH injection of D32 and Breeding-Resynch of DO (GnRH1), luteal regression after PGF before TAI, and ovulation to the GnRH injection before TAI (GnRH2). Overall, P/AI 29 d after TAI was not affected by parity and was greater for DO compared with D32 cows (39 vs. 30%). Pregnancy loss from 29 to 74 d after TAI was not affected by parity or treatment. The percentage of cows with a functional CL (P4 ≥1.0 ng/mL) at GnRH1 was greater for DO than D32 cows (81 vs. 58%), with most DO cows having medium P4 (60%; 1.0 to 3.49 ng/ml), whereas most D32 cows had either low (42%; <1.0 ng/mL) or high (36%; ≥3.5 ng/mL) P4 at GnRH1. Ovulation to GnRH1 was similar between treatments but was affected by serum P4 at GnRH. Cows with low P4 (<1.0 ng/mL) had the greatest ovulatory response (59%), followed by cows with medium (≥1.0 to 3.49 ng/mL; 38%) and then high (≥3.50 ng/mL; 16%) P4 at GnRH1. A greater percentage of DO cows were synchronized compared with D32 cows (72 vs. 51%) primarily due to a greater percentage of D32 than DO cows without a functional CL at the PGF injection before TAI (35 vs. 17%) or without complete CL regression before GnRH2 (17 vs. 7%). We conclude that DO increased fertility of lactating dairy cows during a resynchronization program primarily by increasing synchronization of cows during the Ovsynch protocol before TAI.     

Timed artificial insemination programs during the summer in lactating dairy cows: Comparison of the 5-d Cosynch protocol with an estrogen/progesterone-based protocol

The objective of this study was to compare a GnRH-based to an estrogen/progesterone (E2/P4)-based protocol for estrous cycle synchronization and fixed timed artificial insemination (TAI), both designed for synchronization of ovulation and to reduce the period from follicular emergence until ovulation in cows with a synchronized follicular wave. A total of 1,190 lactating Holstein cows (primiparous: n = 685 and multiparous: n = 505) yielding 26.5 ± 0.30 kg of milk/d at 177 ± 5.02 d in milk were randomly assigned to receive one of the following programs: 5-d Cosynch protocol [d −8: controlled internal drug release (CIDR) + GnRH; d −3: CIDR removal + PGF_2α; d −2: PGF_2α; d 0: TAI + GnRH] or E2/P4 protocol (d −10: CIDR + estradiol benzoate; d −3: PGF_2α; d −2: CIDR removal + estradiol cypionate; d 0: TAI). Rectal temperature and circulating progesterone (P4) were measured on d −3, −2, 0 (TAI), and 7. The estrous cycle was considered to be synchronized when P4 was ≥1.0 ng/mL on d 7 in cows that had luteolysis (P4 ≤0.4 ng/mL on d 0). To evaluate the effects of heat stress, cows were classified by number of heat stress events: 0, 1, and 2-or-more measurements of elevated body temperature (≥39.1°C). Pregnancy success (pregnancy per artificial insemination, P/AI) was determined at d 32 and 60 after TAI. The cows in the 5-d Cosynch protocol had increased circulating P4 at the time of PGF_2α injection (2.66 ± 0.13 vs. 1.66 ± 0.13 ng/mL). The cows in the E2/P4 protocol were more likely to be detected in estrus (62.8 vs. 43.4%) compared with the cows in the 5-d Cosynch protocol, and expression of estrus improved P/AI in both treatments. The cows in the 5-d Cosynch protocol had greater percentage of synchronized estrous cycle (78.2%), compared with cows in the E2/P4 protocol (70.7%). On d 60, the E2/P4 protocol tended to improve P/AI (20.7 vs. 16.7%) and reduced pregnancy loss from 32 to 60 d (11.0 vs. 19.6%), compared with the 5-d Cosynch protocol. In cows withtheir estrous cycle synchronized, the E2/P4 protocol had greater P/AI (25.6 vs. 17.7%) on d 60 and lower pregnancy loss from 32 to 60 d (6.7 vs. 21.7%) compared with cows in the 5-d Cosynch protocol. Follicle diameter affected pregnancy loss from 32 to 60 d only in the cows in the 5-d Cosynch protocol, with smaller follicles resulting in greater pregnancy loss. Pregnancy per AI at d 60 was different between protocols in the cows with 2 or more measurements of heat stress (5-d Cosynch = 12.2% vs. E2/P4 = 22.8%), but not in the cows without or with 1 heat stress measurement. In conclusion, the 5-d Cosynch protocol apparently produced better estrous cycle synchronization than the E2/P4 protocol but did not improve P/AI. The potential explanation for these results is that increased E2 concentrations during the periovulatory period can improve pregnancy success and pregnancy maintenance, and this effect appears to be greatest in heat-stressed cows when circulating E2 may be reduced.     

Prostaglandin F2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone administration improve progesterone status, luteal number, and proportion of ovular and anovular dairy cows with corpora lutea before a timed artificial insemination program

The objective of this research was to increase the proportion of cows with at least 1 functional corpus luteum (CL) and elevated progesterone at the onset of the timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol. Postpartum Holstein cows in one herd were stratified by lactation number at calving (September 2009 through August 2010) and assigned randomly to 2 treatments: 1) Presynch-10 (n=105): two 25-mg injections of PGF(2α) (PG) 14 d apart (Presynch); and 2) PG-3-G (n=105): one 25-mg injection of PG 3 d before 100-μg GnRH (Pre-GnRH) injection, with the PG injection administered at the same time as the second PG injection in the Presynch-10 treatment. Cows were enrolled in a TAI protocol [Ovsynch; injection of GnRH 7 d before (GnRH-1) and 56 h after (GnRH-2) PG injection with AI 16 to 18 h after GnRH-2] 10 d after the second or only PG injection. Blood samples for progesterone or estradiol analyses were collected on median days in milk (DIM): 36, 39, 50, 53 (Pre-GnRH), 60 (GnRH-1), 67 (PG), 69 (GnRH-2), and 70 (TAI). Ovarian structures were measured by ultrasonography on median DIM 53, 60, 67, 69, and 6 d post-TAI to determine follicle diameters, ovulation response to GnRH, or both. Although progesterone concentration did not differ between treatments before Pre-GnRH injection, the proportion of cows with at least 1 CL tended to be greater for PG-3-G than Presynch-10 cows, and more PG-3-G cows ovulated after Pre-GnRH injection than ovulated spontaneously in Presynch-10. Further, the diameter of follicles that ovulated tended to be smaller in PG-3-G than in Presynch-10 cows after Pre-GnRH injection. At GnRH-1, the proportion of cows with progesterone ≥1 ng/mL, the number of CL per cow, and the proportion of cows with at least 1 CL were greater for PG-3-G than Presynch-10. Neither follicle diameter nor percentage of cows ovulating after GnRH-1 differed between treatments. At PG injection during the week of TAI, progesterone concentration and the proportion of cows with progesterone ≥1 ng/mL tended to be greater for PG-3-G than Presynch-10, and PG-3-G had more CL per cow than Presynch-10. No ovarian characteristics differed between treatments after GnRH-2, including progesterone concentration, number of CL per cow, and total luteal volume 7 d after GnRH-2. Many of the previous ovarian traits were improved in both ovular and anovular cows after PG-3-G compared with Presynch-10. Pregnancies per AI at d 32 and 60 were only numerically greater for PG-3-G than for Presynch-10 cows, largely because of differences detected during months without heat stress. We concluded that the PG-3-G treatment increased ovulation rate and luteal function 7 d before the onset of Ovsynch, resulting in improved follicular synchrony and predisposing potentially greater pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows.     

Effect of increasing amounts of supplemental progesterone in a timed artificial insemination protocol on fertility of lactating dairy cows

The objectives were to evaluate the effect of supplemental progesterone during a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol on pregnancy per insemination and pregnancy loss. Lactating dairy cows from 2 dairy herds were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF_2α 14 d apart, and cows observed in estrus following the second PGF_2α injection were inseminated (n = 1,301). Cows not inseminated by 11 d after the end of the presynchronization were submitted to the TAI protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF_2α, d 8 estradiol cypionate, and d 10 TAI). On the day of the GnRH of the TAI protocol (study d 0), cows were assigned randomly to receive no exogenous progesterone (control = 432), one controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert (CIDR1 = 440), or 2 CIDR inserts (CIDR2 = 440) containing 1.38 g of progesterone each from study d 0 to 7. Blood was sampled on study d 0 before insertion of CIDR for determination of progesterone concentration in plasma, and cows with concentration <1.0 ng/mL were classified as low progesterone (LP) and those with concentration ≥1.0 ng/mL were classified as high progesterone (HP). From a subgroup of 240 cows, blood was sampled on study d 3, 7, 17 and 24 and ovaries were examined by ultrasonography on study d 0 and 7. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 38 ± 3 and 66 ± 3 d after AI. Data were analyzed including only cows randomly assigned to treatments and excluding cows that were inseminated after the second PGF_2α injection. The proportion of cows classified as HP at the beginning of the TAI protocol was similar among treatments, but differed between herds. Concentrations of progesterone in plasma during the TAI protocol increased linearly with number of CIDR used, and the increment was 0.9 ng/mL per CIDR. The proportion of cows with plasma progesterone ≥1.0 ng/mL on study d 17 was not affected by treatment, but a greater proportion of control than CIDR-treated cows had asynchronous estrous cycles following the TAI protocol. Treatment with CIDR inserts, however, did not affect pregnancy at 38 ± 3 and 66 ± 3 d after AI or pregnancy loss.     

Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone after first timed artificial insemination improves fertility in noncycling lactating dairy cows

Lactating Holstein cows were assigned randomly to treatments to improve fertility after first postpartum timed artificial insemination (TAI). In Experiment 1, cows received no treatment (control; n = 9), a controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) insert from 5 to 12 d after TAI (CIDR; n = 9), or 100 μg of GnRH 5 d after TAI (G5; n = 7). Although treatments did not affect circulating progesterone (P₄) concentrations from 5 to 19 d after TAI, there was a tendency for CIDR cows to have greater P₄ compared with control or G5 cows within 24 h after treatment. In 2 field trials, cows received either control (n = 223), CIDR (n = 218), or G5 (n = 227) treatments (Experiment 2), or control (n = 160), G5 (n = 159), or treatment with 100 μg of GnRH 7 d after TAI (G7; n = 163; Experiment 3). Treatment did not affect pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in Experiments 2 or 3; however, when data were combined to compare control (n = 383) and G5 (n = 386) treatments, P/AI tended to be greater for G5 (49.1%) than for control (45.8%) cows. This effect resulted from a GnRH treatment × cyclicity status interaction in which P/AI for noncycling cows receiving G5 was greater than for noncycling control cows (45.5 vs. 31.1%). In conclusion, treatment with CIDR inserts after TAI had no effect on P/AI, whereas treatment with GnRH 5 d after TAI improved P/AI for noncycling, but not for cycling cows.     

Fertility of dairy cows after resynchronization of ovulation at three intervals following first timed insemination

Lactating Holstein cows (n = 711) on a commercial dairy farm in Wisconsin received a hormonal synchronization protocol to initiate first timed artificial insemination (TAI) on the following postpartum schedule: two injections of 25 mg PGF2alpha at 32 +/- 3 d and 46 +/- 3 d (Presynch); 100 microg GnRH at 60 +/- 3 d; 25 mg PGF2alpha at 67 +/- 3 d; and 100 microg GnRH + TAI at 69 +/- 3 d (Ovsynch). At first TAI, cows were randomly assigned to initiate the first GnRH injection of a hormonal protocol for resynchronization of ovulation (Resynch; 100 microg GnRH, d 0, 25 mg PGF2alpha, d 7, 100 microg GnRH + TAI, d 9) at 19 (D19), 26 (D26), or 33 d (D33) after first TAI to set up a second TAI service for cows failing to conceive to Ovsynch. Overall pregnancy rate per artificial insemination (PR/AI) to Ovsynch assessed 68 d after TAI was 31% and did not differ among treatment groups. For Resynch, PR/AI was assessed 26 d after TAI for D19 and D26 cows and 33 d after TAI for D33 cows. Overall PR/AI to Resynch was 32%. However, the PR/AI for D26 (34%) and D33 (38%) cows to Resynch was greater than for D19 cows (23%). Cows with a CL at the PGF2alpha injection (D19 cows) or at the first GnRH injection (D26 + D33 cows) of Resynch exhibited greater PR/AI to Resynch compared with cows without a CL. Survival analysis (failure time) of cows in the D26 and D33 treatment groups across the first three TAI services did not differ statistically. Although administration of GnRH to pregnant cows 19 d after first TAI service did not appear to induce iatrogenic embryonic loss, initiation of Resynch 19 d after first TAI service resulted in a lower PR/AI compared with initiation of Resynch 26 or 33 d after first TAI service.     

Effect of interval from timed artificial insemination to initiation of resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating dairy cows

To compare 2 strategies for systematically resynchronizing ovulation, lactating Holstein cows (n = 763) at various days in milk and prior artificial insemination services were assigned randomly at timed AI (TAI) to receive the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch 26 (D26) or 33 (D33) d after TAI to resynchronize ovulation (Resynch) in cows failing to conceive. Cows in the D26 treatment received GnRH 26 d after TAI and continued Resynch only when diagnosed not pregnant by using ultrasonography 33 d after TAI, whereas D33 cows initiated Resynch only when diagnosed not pregnant 33 d after TAI. Cows were classified based on the presence or absence of a corpus luteum (CL) at the not-pregnant diagnosis, and cows without a CL received an intravaginal progesterone-releasing insert during Resynch. When analyzed as a systematic strategy, pregnancy rate per AI (PR/AI) was greater for cows assigned to the D33 than the D26 Resynch treatment (39.4 vs. 28.6%). A treatment × parity interaction was detected for PR/AI after Resynch for nonpregnant cows having a CL in which primiparous cows had a greater PR/AI than multiparous cows when Resynch was initiated 33 d after the initial TAI, and primiparous and multiparous cows when Resynch was initiated 26 d after the initial TAI. Pregnancy loss for Resynch was 6.4% between 33 and 40 d, and 2.6% between 40 and 61 d after Resynch TAI. We concluded that delaying initiation of Resynch until 33 d after TAI increased PR/AI for primiparous cows.     

Presynchronization with prostaglandin F2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone simultaneously improved first-service pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows compared with Presynch-14 when combined with detection of estrus

This study aimed to determine the effect of 2 simple breeding strategies combining artificial insemination (AI) after detection of estrus (AIED) and timed AI (TAI) on first-service fertility in lactating Holstein cows. Weekly, lactating Holstein cows (n = l,049) between 40 and 46 d in milk (DIM) were randomly assigned to initiate 1 of 2 breeding strategies for first service: Presynch-14 and PG+G. Presynch-14 is a presynchronization strategy with 2 PGF_2α treatments 14 d apart with the last PGF_2α 14 d before the initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Cows treated with PG+G receive a simpler presynchronization program that uses PGF_2α and GnRH simultaneously 7 d before Ovsynch. In both treatments, cows detected in standing estrus by tail chalk at any time ≥55 DIM were inseminated, and treatment was discontinued (n = 525). Cows completing treatment received TAI from 78 to 84 DIM (n = 526). In a subgroup of cows that received TAI, blood was collected (n = 163) to assess circulating concentrations of progesterone, and ultrasonographic evaluations of ovaries were performed on the day of first GnRH of Ovsynch (n = 162) and PGF_2α of Ovsynch (n = 122). The proportion of cows that received TAI was greater for PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (63.5 vs. 31.9%), which increased DIM at first service for cows treated with PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (75.5 ± 0.4 vs. 68.7 ± 0.4). For cows receiving TAI, the ovulatory response to first GnRH of Ovsynch (73.8 vs. 48.8%) and the proportion of cows with functional corpora lutea (92.6 vs. 73.1%) were greater for PG+G than Presynch-14. Cows treated with PG+G had greater overall pregnancy per AI (P/AI) 42 ± 7 d after AI (40.2 vs. 33.6%) and calving per AI (32.1 vs. 25.2%) than Presynch-14. For cows receiving AIED, treatment did not affect P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI. However, for cows receiving TAI, PG+G increased P/AI compared with Presynch-14 (44.6 vs. 35.2%). Overall, cows receiving TAI had greater P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI (42.5 vs. 31.5%) and calving per AI (34.1 vs. 23.7%) and decreased pregnancy loss (16.8 vs. 25.2%) than cows receiving AIED. In summary, PG+G increased the proportion of cows receiving TAI and the DIM at first service, P/AI, and calving per AI compared with Presynch-14 when both TAI programs were combined with AIED.     

A modified presynchronization protocol improves fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

To compare 2 hormonal protocols for submission of lactating dairy cows for timed artificial insemination (TAI), nonpregnant lactating Holstein cows (n = 269) >60 d in milk were randomly assigned to each of 2 treatments to receive TAI (TAI = d 0). Cows assigned to the first treatment (Ovsynch, n = 134) received 50 microg of GnRH (d -10), 25 mg of PGF2alpha (d -3), and 50 microg of GnRH (d -1) beginning at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Cows assigned to the second treatment (Presynch, n = 135) received Ovsynch but with the addition of 2 PGF2alpha (25 mg) injections administered 14 d apart beginning 28 d (d -38 and -24) before initiation of Ovsynch. All cows received TAI 16 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovulatory response after each GnRH injection for a subset of cows (n = 109) and pregnancy status 42 d after TAI for all cows were assessed using transrectal ultrasonography. Based on serum progesterone (P4) profiles determined for a subset of cows (n = 109), P4 concentrations decreased for Presynch cows after the first 2 PGF2alpha injections, and Presynch cows had greater P4 concentrations at the PGF2alpha injection on d -3 compared with Ovsynch cows. Although the proportion of cows ovulating after the first and second GnRH injections did not differ statistically between treatments (41.1 and 69.6% vs. 35.9 and 81.1% for Ovsynch vs. Presynch, respectively), pregnancy rate per artificial insemination (PR/AI) at 42 d post TAI was greater for Presynch than for Ovsynch cows (49.6 vs. 37.3%). Parity, DIM, and body condition score (BCS) at TAI did not affect PR/AI to TAI. These data support use of this presynchronization protocol to increase PR/ AI of lactating dairy cows receiving TAI compared with Ovsynch.     

Characterization of luteal dynamics in lactating Holstein cows for 32 days after synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination

Approximately 20 to 30% of cows diagnosed not pregnant 32 d after timed artificial insemination (TAI) lack a corpus luteum (CL), and cows submitted to a resynchronization protocol in the absence of a CL have about 10% fewer pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than cows with a CL. An understanding of luteal dynamics after synchronization of ovulation and TAI may help refine strategies for reinseminating cows failing to conceive. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 141) were synchronized for first TAI using a Double-Ovsynch protocol. Thrice weekly from 4 to 32 d after TAI, blood samples were collected for evaluation of plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations, and CL diameter was measured using transrectal ultrasonography. Pregnancy status was determined using transrectal ultrasonography 32 d after TAI. Nonsynchronized cows (n = 4) were removed from the study. For cows diagnosed pregnant 32 d after TAI (n = 57), P4 increased from 4 to 15 d and then remained constant until 32 d after TAI, whereas CL volume increased from 4 to 11 d and then remained constant until 32 d after TAI. For cows diagnosed not pregnant 32 d after TAI (n = 80), P4 profiles were evaluated using statistical cluster analysis based on the day after TAI that P4 decreased to <1 ng/mL, resulting in 5 clusters: (1) CL regression 15 d after TAI (1.3%), (2) CL regression 18 to 22 d after TAI (55.0%), (3) CL regression 25 to 27 d after TAI (17.5%), (4) CL regression 29 to 32 d after TAI (5.0%), and (5) CL maintained until 32 d after TAI (21.3%). Plasma pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) levels at 25 and 32 d after TAI differed among clusters and were below the cut-off value of the assay for the classification of cows as not pregnant for cows in clusters 2, 3, and 4, whereas more than half of the cows in cluster 5 had increased plasma PAG levels. We conclude that at least half of the nonpregnant cows that maintained their CL until 32 d after TAI were initially pregnant but underwent early pregnancy loss based on increased plasma PAG levels at 25 and 32 d after TAI.     

Short communication: Optimization of a timed artificial insemination program for reproductive management of heifers in Canadian dairy herds

Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) following the use of 1 of 2 timed AI (TAI) protocols and 2 different intervals between TAI and resynchronization were compared in heifers that were inseminated with either conventional or sex-sorted semen. Holstein heifers (n = 317; 527 inseminations) were submitted to a 5-d Cosynch protocol with (+) or without (–) GnRH at the time of controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insertion on d 0, CIDR removal and a single PGF_2α treatment on d 5, and TAI plus GnRH on d 8 (72 h later). Visual estrus detection (ED) was conducted on d 6 in the afternoon and d 7 in the morning and heifers observed in estrus were artificially inseminated on d 7 in the afternoon. Heifers were alternately assigned conventional or sex-sorted semen. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound 27 and 42 d after AI, and heifers diagnosed as nonpregnant were resynchronized, up to 3 times, starting on d 27 or 34 to provide an interbreeding interval of 35 or 42 d. Overall, TAI protocol had no effect on P/AI at 27 or 42 d after artificial insemination or on pregnancy loss, but P/AI following the first service tended to be higher in the –GnRH TAI group (66.3 vs. 56.8%). Pregnancy per AI at 27 d (61.9 vs. 55.5%) tended to differ between conventional and sex-sorted semen. Heifers artificially inseminated based on ED tended to have a greater P/AI (67.6 vs. 58.2%) and had decreased pregnancy loss (0.0 vs. 4.1%) than those submitted to TAI. A greater number of heifers in the –GnRH TAI protocol were artificially inseminated on ED than the +GnRH TAI protocol (21.5 vs. 13.7%). No difference in P/AI was observed between the 35- and 42-d interbreeding intervals; however, more heifers in the 42-d group were artificially inseminated based on ED than in the 35-d group (22.7 vs. 7.8%). A 5-d Cosynch+CIDR TAI protocol without the initial GnRH and with a single PGF_2α at CIDR removal is an acceptable alternative to achieve high P/AI when either conventional or sex-sorted semen is used in Holstein heifers. Breeding heifers based on detected estrus increases labor, but has the potential to increase fertility.     

Resynchronizing estrus with progesterone or progesterone plus estrogen in cows of unknown pregnancy status

Two experiments were conducted to test 2 progesterone (P4)-based treatments that were applied to lactating dairy cattle of unknown pregnancy status to resynchronize estrus of nonpregnant cows. In experiment 1, cows were assigned randomly before a timed AI (TAI) to 1) treatment with a CIDR (controlled internal drug-releasing intravaginal insert containing P4) for 7 d starting on d 13 after TAI (CIDR; n = 300) or 2) no P4 treatment (control; n = 330). Compared with controls, P4 increased the synchrony of those detected in estrus, but failed to increase the overall return rates of non-pregnant cows during the 6 d after CIDR removal (27% vs. 31%; d 20 to 26 after TAI) and did not alter synchronized conception rates (32% vs. 20%) of those inseminated. Use of P4 did not compromise pregnancies resulting from TAI compared with controls (38% vs. 42%), but increased embryo survival between d 29 and 57 after TAI (65.5% vs. 44.3%). In experiment 2, on d 13 after TAI, 196 cows were treated with a CIDR insert for 7 d. Controls received no further treatment. Remaining cows were treated with 1 of 3 estrogen regimens: 1 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB), 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP), or 1 mg of ECP on both d 13 and 21. Only 60% of nonpregnant, estrogen-treated cows were detected in estrus between d 20 and 26, and rates of return and conception did not differ among treatments. Estrogen on d 13 did not consistently turn over the dominant follicle when given at CIDR insertion but did increase concentrations of estradiol and reduced luteal function when administered on d 13 and 21 (24 h after CIDR removal). Treatments had no negative effects on milk yield, dry matter intake, or established pregnancies. Use of P4 alone had little effect on overall rates of return to estrus or conception at the first eligible estrus in experiment 1. Combining estrogen with P4 in experiment 2 had no detrimental effects on established pregnancies or subsequent conception and failed to improve return rates beyond P4 alone.     

Effect of reducing the period of follicle dominance in a timed artificial insemination protocol on reproduction of dairy cows

Objectives were to determine the effect of reducing the period of follicle dominance in a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein cows. In experiment 1, 165 cows received 2 injections of PGF_2α at 36 and 50 d in milk (DIM). At 61 DIM, cows were assigned randomly to Cosynch 72 h (CoS72: d 61 GnRH, d 68 PGF_2α, d 71 GnRH) or to a 5-d Cosynch 72 h with 1 (5dCoS1: d 61 GnRH, d 66 PGF_2α, d 69 GnRH) or 2 injections of PGF_2α (5dCoS2: d 61 GnRH, d 66 and 67 PGF_2α, d 69 GnRH). Blood was sampled at the first GnRH, first PGF_2α, and at the second GnRH of the protocols and assayed for progesterone. Ovulatory responses to GnRH were evaluated by ultrasonography. Cows were considered synchronized if they had concentrations of progesterone ≥1 ng/mL and <1 ng/mL on the days of the PGF_2α, and the second GnRH of the protocols, respectively, and if they ovulated within 48 h of the second GnRH injection. In experiment 2, 933 cows were assigned randomly to CoS72 or 5dCoS2. Blood was assayed for progesterone and ovaries were scanned as in experiment 1. Plasma on the days of the first PGF_2α and final GnRH of the timed AI protocols was assayed for estradiol in 75 cows. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 38 and 66 after AI. In experiment 1, the proportions of cows with corpora lutea (CL) regression on the day of AI differed and were 79.0, 59.1, and 95.7% for CoS72, 5dCoS1, and 5dCoS2, respectively. Cows that ovulated to the first GnRH of the Cosynch tended to have lesser CL regression than cows that did not ovulate (73.0 vs. 86.4%). Protocol synchronization differed between treatments and they were greater for CoS72 (69.4%) and 5dCoS2 (78.4%) than for 5dCoS1 (42.3%). In experiment 2, CL regression was lesser (91.5 vs. 96.3%) but detection of estrus at timed AI (30.9 vs. 23.6%) was greater for CoS72 than 5dCoS2, and cows in estrus had increased P/AI (46.2 vs. 31.9%). Cows in CoS72 ovulated a larger follicle and had greater concentrations of estradiol on the day of AI than cows in 5dCoS2, but protocol synchronization tended to increase in cows receiving the 5dCoS2. When all 933 cows were evaluated, P/AI was greater for 5dCoS2 than for CoS72 (37.9 vs. 30.9%). Similarly, when only cows with progesterone <1 ng/mL on the day of AI were evaluated, P/AI was greater for 5dCoS2 than for CoS72 (39.3 vs. 33.9%). Treatment with PGF_2α on d 5 and 6 after GnRH resulted in increased luteolysis and allowed for reducing the interval from GnRH to timed AI, which increased P/AI. Reducing time of follicle dominance in timed AI protocols improves fertility of lactating dairy cows.     

Detection of anovulation by heatmount detectors and transrectal ultrasonography before treatment with progesterone in a timed insemination protocol

Our objective was to determine the accuracy of identifying noncycling lactating dairy cows before the application of a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol [with or without progesterone supplementation via a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert and 2 different timings of AI] by using heatmount detectors and a single ovarian ultrasound examination. At 6 locations in the Midwest, 1,072 cows were enrolled in a Presynch protocol (2 injections of PGF_2α 14 d apart), with the second injection administered 14 d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol (injection of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after PGF_2α injection, with timed AI at 0 or 24 h after the second GnRH injection). Heatmount detectors were applied to cows just before the first Presynch injection, assessed 14 d later at the second Presynch injection (replaced when activated or missing), and reassessed at initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Ovaries were examined for the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) by ultrasound before the initiation of treatment. Treatments were assigned to cows based on the presence or absence of a CL detected by ultrasound: 1) no CL + no CIDR; 2) no CL + CIDR insert for 7 d; and 3) CL present. Further, alternate cows within the 3 treatments were assigned to be inseminated concurrent with the second GnRH injection of Ovsynch (0 h) or 24 h later. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 33 and 61 d after the second GnRH injection. By using low (<1 ng/mL) concentrations of progesterone in serum as the standard for noncycling status, heatmount detectors were activated on a large percentage of noncycling cows (>60%), whereas the single ultrasound examination incorrectly classified noncycling cows only 21% of the time. Conversely, cycling cows (progesterone ≥1 ng/mL) were correctly identified 70 to 78% of the time by heatmount detectors, but 85 to 92% were correctly identified by ultrasound. Overall accuracy of heatmount detectors and ultrasound was 71 and 84%, respectively. Application of progesterone to cows without a CL at the time of the first injection of GnRH reduced the incidence of ovulation but increased the proportions of pregnancies per AI at d 33 or 61 compared with nontreated cows without a CL at the onset of the Ovsynch protocol. Percentages of cows pregnant and pregnancy survival did not differ for cows having a CL before treatment compared with those not having a CL and treated with progesterone. Compared with no response, when a follicle ovulated in response to the first GnRH injection, percentage of cows becoming pregnant after the timed AI increased from 33.3 to 41.6%. Timing of AI at 0 or 24 h after the second GnRH injection did not alter pregnancies per AI, but cows having luteal activity before treatment had improved pregnancies per AI compared with noncycling cows. We conclude that identifying noncycling cows by ultrasound was more accurate than by heatmount detectors. Subsequent progesterone treatment of previously cycling cows not having a CL at the onset of Ovsynch increased the proportion of pregnant cows, equal to that of cows having a CL but not treated with progesterone.     

Alternative programs to presynchronize estrous cycles in dairy cattle before a timed artificial insemination program

The objective was to test potential presynchronization programs applied to cows before a timed artificial insemination (TAI) program to increase the percentage of cows ovulating in response to both GnRH injections of a TAI program and having a functional corpus luteum before the first GnRH injection of the TAI program. At calving, cows were blocked by lactation (1 vs. 2+) and assigned randomly to receive 1 of 5 presynchronization treatments. Two variants of the standard Presynch program were tested in which 2 injections of PGF_2α were administered 14 d apart with either 14 d (Pre14; n = 122), 12 d (Pre12; n = 123), or 10 d (Pre10; n = 151) intervening before a TAI program was initiated. Two other presynchronization programs consisted of administering a progesterone-releasing controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert for 7 d plus PGF_2α administration at insert removal. Insert removal occurred either 10 d (CIDR10; n = 157) or 3 d (CIDR3; n = 117) before a TAI program was initiated. The TAI program was a standard Cosynch program [injection of GnRH 7 d before (GnRH-1) and 72 h after (GnRH-2) PGF_2α with TAI administered 72 h after PGF_2α). Cosynch served as the control (n = 157), and cows were assumed to be starting this program at random stages of the estrous cycle. From a subset of cows per treatment (ranging from 49 to 51 cows each), blood samples were collected from coccygeal vessels by using evacuated tubes at d −28, −14, 0 (onset of TAI program), 7, 9, 14, and 21. Ovarian scans were conducted on d 0, 7, 9, 14, and 21 by transrectal ultrasonography. Diameters of follicles and corpus luteum were measured at each exam, and ovulation was determined on d 7 (response to GnRH-1 on d 0) and d 14 (response to GnRH-2 on d 10). Ovulatory incidence after GnRH-1 (47.1 to 67.3%) and GnRH-2 (78 to 90.2%) varied but did not differ among treatments. Before GnRH-1, progesterone concentrations were less in the CIDR3 treatment than in all other treatments. Before GnRH-2, progesterone was greater in the CIDR3 treatment than in all other treatments. Luteal regression and synchronization rate (successful luteolysis and ovulation after GnRH-2) did not differ among treatments. Pregnancy rate per AI at 32 and 60 d post TAI was less in CIDR3 cows than in cows in all other treatments. None of the Presynch treatments improved key responses (ovulation, luteolysis, and synchronization rate) known to improve fertility compared with a standard Cosynch program without presynchronization.     

Effect of reproductive management programs that prioritized artificial insemination at detected estrus or timed artificial insemination on the reproductive performance of primiparous Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility

Our objective was to compare reproductive outcomes of primiparous lactating Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility submitted for insemination with management programs that prioritized artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus (AIE) or timed AI (TAI). Moreover, we aimed to determine whether subgroups of cows with different fertility potential would present a distinct response to the reproductive management strategies compared. Lactating primiparous Holstein cows (n = 6 commercial farms) were stratified into high (Hi-Fert), medium (Med-Fert), and low (Lo-Fert) genetic fertility groups (FG) based on a Reproduction Index value calculated from multiple genomic-enhanced predicted transmitting abilities. Within herd and FG, cows were randomly assigned either to a program that prioritized TAI and had an extended voluntary waiting period (P-TAI; n = 1,338) or another that prioritized AIE (P-AIE; n = 1,416) and used TAI for cows, not AIE. Cows in P-TAI received first service by TAI at 84 ± 3 d in milk (DIM) after a Double-Ovsynch protocol, were AIE if detected in estrus after a previous AI, and received TAI after an Ovsynch-56 protocol at 35 ± 3 d after a previous AI if a corpus luteum (CL) was visualized at nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) 32 ± 3 d after AI. Cows with no CL visualized at NPD received TAI at 42 ± 3 d after AI after an Ovsynch-56 protocol with progesterone supplementation (P4-Ovsynch). Cows in P-AIE were eligible for AIE after a PGF_2α treatment at 53 ± 3 DIM and after a previous AI. Cows not AIE by 74 ± 3 DIM or by NPD 32 ± 3 d after AI received P4-Ovsynch for TAI at 74 ± 3 DIM or 42 ± 3 d after AI. Binary data were analyzed with logistic regression, count data with Poisson regression, continuous data by ANOVA, and time to event data by Cox's proportional hazard regression. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) to first service was greater for cows in the Hi-Fert (59.8%) than the Med-Fert (53.6%) and Lo-Fert (47.7%) groups, and for the P-TAI (58.7%) than the P-AIE (48.7%) treatment. Overall, P/AI for all second and subsequent AI combined did not differ by treatment (P-TAI = 45.2%; P-AIE = 44.5%) or FG (Hi-Fert = 46.1%; Med-Fert = 46.0%; Lo-Fert = 42.4%). The hazard of pregnancy after calving was greater for the P-AIE than the P-TAI treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.37)], and for the Hi-Fert than the Med-Fert (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.28) and Lo-Fert (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.49) groups. More cows in the Hi-Fert (91.2%) than the Med-Fert (88.4%) and Lo-Fert (85.8%) groups were pregnant at 200 DIM. Within FG, the hazard of pregnancy was greater for the P-AIE than the P-TAI treatment for the Hi-Fert (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.64) and Med-Fert (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.46) groups but not for the Lo-Fert group (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.31). We conclude that primiparous Holstein cows of superior genetic merit for fertility had better reproductive performance than cows of inferior genetic merit for fertility, regardless of the type of reproductive management used. In addition, the effect of programs that prioritized AIE or TAI on reproductive performance for cows of superior or inferior genetic merit for fertility depended on the outcomes evaluated. Thus, programs that prioritize AIE or TAI could be used to affect certain outcomes of reproductive performance or management.     

Comparison of reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen based on expression of estrus,pregnancy outcomes,and cost per pregnancy

Our objective was to evaluate reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen. In experiment 1, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 462) were submitted to a 5-d progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID)-Synch protocol [d 0, GnRH + PRID; d 5, PGF_2α − PRID; d 6, PGF_2α; d 8, GnRH + TAI] and were randomly assigned for PRID removal on d 5 or 6 of the protocol followed by timed artificial insemination (TAI) with conventional semen. Delaying PRID removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.9 vs. 12.2%), and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ between treatments. In experiment 2, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 736) from 3 commercial farms were randomized within farm to 1 of 3 treatments for first AI with sexed semen: (1) CIDR5 [d −6, GnRH + controlled internal drug release (CIDR); d −1, PGF_2α − CIDR; d 0, PGF_2α; d 2, GnRH + TAI]; (2) CIDR6 (d −6, GnRH + CIDR; d −1, PGF_2α; d 0, PGF_2α − CIDR; d 2, GnRH + TAI); and (3) EDAI (PGF_2α on d 0 followed by once-daily estrous detection and AI). Delaying CIDR removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.004 vs. 27.8%); however, CIDR5 heifers tended to have more P/AI at 35 (53 vs. 45 vs. 46%) and 64 (52 vs. 45 vs. 45%) days after AI than CIDR6 and EDAI heifers, respectively. Overall, CIDR5 and CIDR6 heifers had fewer days to first AI and pregnancy than EDAI heifers which resulted in less feed costs than EDAI heifers due to fewer days on feed until pregnancy. Despite greater hormonal treatment costs for CIDR5 heifers, costs per pregnancy were $16.66 less for CIDR5 than for EDAI heifers. In conclusion, delaying PRID removal by 24 h within a 5-d PRID-Synch protocol in experiment 1 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, and P/AI for heifers inseminated with conventional semen did not differ between treatments. By contrast, although delaying CIDR removal by 24 h within a 5-CIDR-Synch protocol in experiment 2 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, delaying CIDR removal by 24 h tended to decrease P/AI for heifers inseminated with sexed semen. Further, submission of heifers to a 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol for first AI tended to increase P/AI and decrease the cost per pregnancy compared with EDAI heifers.     

Resynchronization of ovulation protocols for dairy cows including or not including gonadotropin-releasing hormone to induce a new follicular wave: Effects on re-insemination pattern,ovarian responses,and pregnancy outcomes

Our objectives were to evaluate the pattern of re-insemination, ovarian responses, and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) of cows submitted to different resynchronization of ovulation protocols. The base protocol started at 25 ± 3 d after artificial insemination (AI) and was as follows: GnRH, 7 and 8 d later PGF_2α, GnRH 32 h after second PGF_2α, and fixed timed AI (TAI) 16 to 18 h after GnRH. At 18 ± 3 d after AI, cows were randomly assigned to the G25 (n = 1,100) or NoG25 (n = 1,098) treatments. The protocol for G25 and NoG25 was the same, except that cows in NoG25 did not receive GnRH 25 ± 3 d after AI. At nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD), 32 ± 3 d after AI, cows from G25 and NoG25 with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm in diameter and a follicle ≥10 mm completed the protocol (G25 CL = 272, NoG25 CL = 194), whereas cows from both treatments that did not meet these criteria received a modified Ovsynch protocol with P4 supplementation [controlled internal drug release insert plus GnRH, controlled internal drug release insert removal, and PGF_2α 7 and 8 d later, GnRH 32 h after second PGF_2α, and TAI 16 to 18 h after GnRH (G25 NoCL = 53, NoG25 NoCL = 78)]. Serum concentrations of progesterone (P4) were determined and ovarian ultrasonography was performed thrice weekly from 18 ± 3 d after AI until 1 d after TAI (G25 = 46, NoG25 = 44 cows). A greater percentage of NoG25 cows were re-inseminated at detected estrus (NoG25 = 53.5%, G25 = 44.6%), whereas more cows had a CL at NPD in G25 than NoG25 (83.7 and 71.3%). At 32 d after AI, P/AI was similar for G25 and NoG25 for inseminations at detected estrus (38.4 and 42.9%), TAI services for cows with no CL (40.4 and 36.7%), and for all services combined (39.6 and 39.0%). However, P/AI were greater for cows with a CL in G25 than NoG25 (40.6 and 32.8%) that received TAI. More cows ovulated spontaneously or in response to GnRH for the G25 than the NoG25 treatment (70 and 36%) but a similar proportion had an active follicle at NPD (G25 = 91% and NoG25 = 96%). The largest follicle diameter at NPD (G25 = 15.0 ± 0.4 mm, NoG25 = 16.5 ± 0.6 mm) and days since it reached ≥10 mm (G25 = 4.0 ± 0.3 d, NoG25 = 5.8 ± 0.6 d) were greater for the NoG25 than G25 treatment. For cows with a CL at NPD, CL regression after NPD, ovulation after TAI, and ovulatory follicle diameter did not differ. In conclusion, removing the first GnRH of a modified Resynch-25 protocol for cows with a CL at NPD and a modified Ovsynch protocol with P4 supplementation for cows without a CL at NPD resulted in a greater percentage of cows re-inseminated at detected estrus and a similar proportion of cows pregnant in spite of reduced P/AI for cows with a CL at NPD.