Juvenile polyposis of the stomach: clinicopathological features and its malignant potential

AIMS: To clarify a clinical entity of juvenile polyposis of the stomach compared with generalised juvenile gastrointestinal polyposis. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of juvenile polyposis dominantly involving the stomach at initial presentation were reviewed in 12 patients (three new patients and nine from the literature). These were compared with 29 cases of generalised juvenile gastrointestinal polyposis. RESULTS: There were three men and nine women with juvenile polyposis of the stomach, aged 10-63 years. Hypoproteinaemia was present in nine patients, anaemia in seven, and a family history of intestinal polyposis in seven. No patient presented with a congenital abnormality. During the observation period, two patients developed colonic juvenile polyps. Gastric polyps invariably affected the antrum and extended to the fundus, eventually becoming more numerous, larger, and more pedunculated. Ten patients required gastrectomy for associated malignancy or uncontrolled protein losing gastropathy. Histological examinations of the resected specimens demonstrated neoplastic tissue arising from juvenile polyps in four of the 12 patients. Atypism in these mixed polyps varied from adenoma to well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Juvenile polyposis of the stomach has malignant potential, and may be a separate entity from generalised juvenile gastrointestinal polyposis.     

Does colonoscopic polypectomy reduce the incidence of colorectal carcinoma?

The study's objective was to examine whether there is evidence that colonoscopic polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer. The records of all patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy by a single surgeon between 1974 and 1991 were reviewed. Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed at the initial colonoscopy, with a history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease or familial adenomatous polyposis or with only hyperplastic polyps were excluded. There were 1008 remaining patients, of whom 645 have attended at least one follow-up colonoscopic examination, and these 645 patients from the basis of the study, because the incidence of cancer is known exactly in this group. The mean period of follow up was 4.4 years and the mean number of follow-up colonoscopic examinations was 2.2. There was a total of 2847 person-years of colonoscopic follow up. The expected incidence of cancer, age and sex adjusted, is calculated using Australian epidemiological figures. The observed incidence of cancer was 3 cases (all asymptomatic) per 2847 person-years, which is indistinguishable from the general population's risk of 3.75 cases per 2847 person-years. Analysis of previous publications suggests that patients with adenomas are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer of about 2.5 times the general population's risk. If correct, then the observed incidence of 3 cases per 2847 person-years is less than the expected incidence of 9.4 cases per 2847 person-years. This analysis suggests colonoscopic polypectomy does reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer.     

A normal initial colonoscopy after age 50 does not predict a polyp-free status for life

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of colon polyps increases with age in the general population. It is unknown whether a lack of adenomatous polyps determined at one time point after the age of 50 is predictive of a subsequent low risk of polyp development. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients between ages 50 and 70 who had no prior history of polyps and had a normal colonoscopy at least 5 yr previously were recruited for follow-up colonoscopy to evaluate the incidence of neoplastic disease in this presumably low-risk group. RESULTS: The incidence of adenomatous polyps after a mean of 5.74 yr was 41.4% (95% confidence interval: 23.5-61.1%). A total of 20 adenomatous polyps were found in 12 patients. Seven polyps were 5 mm or more in size. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients with no history of colonic neoplasia who are 50 yr old, or older, the finding of a normal colonoscopy does not predict diminished risk of neoplasia.     

Pneumocephalus and respiratory depression after accidental dural puncture during epidural analgesia--a case report

BACKGROUND: Adenomatous colonic polyps are accepted as premalignant lesions. There is controversy regarding the significance of the hyperplastic polyp. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of further polyps in patients with only hyperplastic polyps on a first colonoscopy in comparison with patients without polyps and with adenomatous polyps. METHODS: Ninety patients had only hyperplastic polyps (group I). These patients were paired according to age and sex with subjects having no polyps (group II) and with patients having adenomas (group III). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients in group I had at least one follow-up examination. New polyps were found in 46.4% in group I versus 15.5% in group II (p < 0.001) and 50% in group III (NS). In group I, 30.7% of new polyps were hyperplastic and 69.3% were adenomas. In fact, 32.2% of group I patients developed further adenomas (mean 1.5 +/- 0.8 adenomas). These adenomas occurred 1 to 4 years after the first polypectomy (mean 2.4 +/- 0.8 years). Most of these adenomas were small and tubular, but 16.6% were villous or had severe dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Patients with hyperplastic polyps were 2.4 times more likely to have further adenomas than were those without polyps.     

Rate constants for quenching singlet oxygen and activities for inhibiting lipid peroxidation of carotenoids and alpha-tocopherol in liposomes

BACKGROUND: Familial juvenile polyposis (JP) is an autosomal dominant condition in which affected individuals develop upper or lower gastrointestinal (GI) juvenile polyps, or both, and have a predisposition to cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The risk of GI cancer has not been well defined because of the small number of these families and the lack of follow-up. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and age at diagnosis of GI polyposis and cancer in a large JP kindred. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed, patients were interviewed, and histories were taken. Pathology reports and slides were reviewed by our pathologists. A database was created for analysis of clinical and pathologic factors. RESULTS: This kindred contains 117 members, 29 of whom have had upper or lower GI polyps or cancer, or both. All those affected have had colonic juvenile polyps or cancer, except for two who died of advanced gastric cancer and never had colonic evaluation. Nine individuals have had both upper and lower GI polyps or cancer. Sixteen of 29 (55%) affected patients have developed gastrointestinal cancer. Eleven (38%) have had colon cancer, and six (21%) have had upper GI cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of gastrointestinal malignancy in affected members of this JP kindred exceeds 50%. The high risk of GI cancer warrants frequent endoscopic screening of both affected and at-risk family members. Screening will soon be facilitated by presymptomatic genetic testing for the identification of gene carriers.     

Establishment of a colonic polyp registry in Rhode Island

A colonic adenomatous polyp registry (PR) has been organized at the Roger Williams Medical Center whose main functions are to prevent the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the enrollees, to provide a population of subjects for epidemiological and interventional studies, and to provide educational, including dietary, information to subjects and physicians. One hundred four and 202 patients with polyps, originally retrieved from the hospital pathology files, were enrolled in the 1984 and 1987 cohorts, respectively, of whom about 90% were followed for at least three years after polypectomy. Three carcinomas, all Dukes A, were found in the right colon in the follow-up period. New polyps identified in the first three years after polypectomy were generally small tubular adenomas with a greater predilection for the right colon than was found for the index polyps. Risk factors for new polyps included history of previous polyps and, probably, multiple index polyps. The use of colonoscopy for postpolypectomy surveillance increased between 1984 and 1987. About 25% of the subjects in each cohort were either lost to follow-up or received no endoscopic surveillance. On the other hand, some of those who were followed were probably subjected to excessive numbers of procedures. Defects in the PR include inadequacy of personal and family history data, and steady loss of patients during the three to six years after polypectomy. Despite the small size and limited resources of our hospital, its colonic polyp registry has already provided information that may help in the management of patients with this premalignant condition. The more widespread use of securely funded polyp registries would probably reduce the incidence of metachronous CRC in that population and would have significant epidemiological and educational functions.     

Incidence of neoplastic polyps in the ileal pouch of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after restorative proctocolectomy

PURPOSE: Although adenomatous polyps and even adenocarcinomas have been found in the terminal ileum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the prevalence of neoplastic changes in the pouches of patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of pelvic pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Patients in a polyposis registry who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy were recruited. Demographic, surgical, pathologic, and endoscopic data were obtained from patient records. Video pouchoscopy was done after two enemas and representative biopsies were taken. RESULTS: Of 102 eligible patients, 26 (17 males and 9 females) participated. Median age at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was 31 (range, 12-58) years. Median follow-up period was 66 (11-156) months. Adenomas were found in the pouch of 11 (42 percent) patients, in the terminal ileum above the pouch in 1 patient, and in the anal canal of 4 patients. Among patients with pouch polyps, three patients had one lesion, three patients had two lesions, and five patients had more than ten lesions. The incidence of polyps increased steadily with time from restorative proctocolectomy. There was no relation between the incidence of pouch polyposis and the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is associated with a significant risk of pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. The severity of pouch adenomas was not related either to the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. The pelvic pouches of all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy should be examined periodically.     

Fiberoptic colonoscopy: the fate of colonoscopic polypectomy sites

Nine cases of colonoscopic polypectomy followed by colonic resection are reviewed. A properly performed colonoscopic polypectomy produces a mucosal defect resembling a superficial ulceration. Granulation tissue rapidly covers the area, and this, in turn, is eventually covered by normal colonic mucosal epithelium. Mural inflammation is mild and limited to the submucosa, and no demonstrable change occurs in the muscular layers.     

Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for colonic polyps is desirable. A new concept based on cross-sectional and endoscopic analysis of a magnetic resonance (MR) data set is presented. METHODS: Ex vivo autopsy colonic specimens, containing artificially placed polyps, were obtained and filled with a gadolinium-containing solution. Forty-four thin-section MR images were obtained in a 1.5-T MR scanner in 28 seconds. A three-dimensional endoscopic fly-through of these images was rendered. Fly-throughs and two-dimensional cross-sectional images were analyzed by two observers for the presence of polyps. RESULTS: The average sensitivity and specificity for the detection of polyps based on three-dimensional endoscopic MR colon imaging were 87% and 96%, respectively. Analysis of cross-sectional images showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of merely 57% and 84%, respectively. The difference in the interpretation of three-dimensional MR colonoscopy and two-dimensional cross-sections was statistically significant (P < 0.001). With three-dimensional MR colonoscopy, overall sensitivity for detection of polyps measuring < or =5 mm in length and diameter was 70%; for larger polyps, it increased to 95% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of an MR-based endoluminal assessment of the colon is shown. Minimal invasiveness, lack of radiation exposure, and high in vitro diagnostic accuracy warrant further investigation of this novel concept.     

Reducing the subconscious frown by endoscopic resection of the corrugator muscles

A prospective study concerning colorectal polyps in symptomatic patients was held at Lima, Perú, an area considered of low incidence for colorectal neoplasia. In 137 patients, 272 polyps were resected by colonoscopic polypectomy or surgery. 55.9% were adenomas, 40.4% non neoplastic polyps and 3.7% polypoid carcinomas. The distribution of polyps, and the incidence of dysplasia and malignant changes in the adenomas, were similar of that reported in areas with high incidence of colorectal cancer. A high proportion of patients with adenomas (21.4% had a synchronous advanced carcinoma, specially if there were multiple adenomas. The figure was lower in patients with only non neoplastic polyps (7.5%). There were no cases of "de novo" carcinoma. This evidence suggest that adenomas play an essential role in colorectal cancer histogenesis, even in areas of low incidence of this neoplasia.     

Purification and characterization of a cytotoxin from Enterobacter cloacae

OBJECTIVE: To document our evolving surgical management of colonoscopic perforation and examine factors crucial to the improvement of patient care. DESIGN: We conducted a computer-based retrospective analysis of medical records (1980 through 1995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 57,028 colonoscopic procedures performed, 43 patients (0.075%, or 1 perforation in 1,333 procedures) had a colonic perforation. Two additional patients were treated after colonoscopy performed elsewhere. The outcomes analyzed included surgical morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-six women and 19 men who ranged in age from 28 to 85 years (median, 69) were treated for colonic perforation. More than 80% of perforations occurred during the latter half of the study period because of the increased volume of colonoscopic procedures (8 perforations among 12,581 examinations from 1980 through 1987 versus 35 perforations among 44,447 colonoscopies from 1988 through 1995). Emergency laparotomy was performed in 42 patients (93%). Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right side = 10; transverse = 9; and left side = 23. Three patients without evidence of peritoneal irritation fared well with nonoperative management. Most patients underwent primary repair or limited resection in conjunction with end-to-end anastomosis. In 14 patients (33%), an ostomy was created. One patient underwent laparotomy without further treatment. Intra-abdominal contamination ranged from none (31%) to local soiling (48%) to diffusely feculent (21%). Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients and were associated with older age (P = 0.01), large perforations (P = 0.03), and prior hospitalization (P = 0.04). No postoperative deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite a consistently low risk of colonic perforation, the increasing use of colonoscopy in our practice has resulted in an increased number of iatrogenic colonic perforations. In order to minimize morbidity and mortality, prompt operative intervention is the best strategy in most patients. Non-operative management is warranted in carefully selected patients without peritoneal irritation.     

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome. Epidemiology, symptoms, morphology and therapy based on a case report and literature review

Juvenile polyposis was first described by Cronkhite and Canada in 1955. This disease is characterized by juvenile intestinal polyps and ectodermal abnormalities. The etiology of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS), however, is still not well understood. Interestingly among patients with CCS a significant correlation (16.5%) with intestinal carcinomas has been observed. Thus, malignant transformation and/or genetic predisposition may be involved in the initiation of the disease. In the following, epidemiology, symptoms, morphology and therapy of CCS are discussed. Our examinations are based on studies reported in the literature and on a case report of a female patient who developed a colon carcinoma 2 years after initial diagnosis of CCS.     

A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of methohexital in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of a possible correlation between distal polyps found at screening sigmoidoscopy and proximal colonic lesions is important for deciding whether to perform total colonoscopy or not. PATIENTS: A prospective analysis of 2439 consecutive patients with colorectal polyps. Of these, 304 were asymptomatic subjects who underwent complete colonoscopy for screening and were found to have adenomatous or hyperplastic polyps in the distal colorectum. RESULTS: Ten (15%) out of 65 patients with distal hyperplastic polyps only and 86 (36%) out of 239 with distal adenomatous polyps were found to have adenomatous polyps in the proximal colon as well (P < 0.001). The frequency of synchronous proximal adenomas in patients with small (< or = 5 mm) or large distal adenomas (> 5 mm) was comparable (37% and 35%, respectively). However, patients with small distal adenomas had significantly smaller proximal adenomas (P = 0.004) containing less villous component (P = 0.017) than those with large distal adenomas. Neither the patient's age nor the presence of multiple distal adenomas increased the prevalence of proximal adenomas. CONCLUSION: Hyperplastic polyps found on rectosigmoidoscopy do not indicate a need for a complete colorectal examination, as 15% of patients with distal hyperplastic polyps will have proximal adenomatous polyps, a figure that is comparable with that of asymptomatic patients having no distal polyps, either hyperplastic or adenomatous. When only small distal adenomas are found at screening sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic persons the decision to do a total colonoscopy should be based on individual considerations, as in such cases only small polyps are to be expected in the proximal colon.     

Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution

OBJECTIVES: Adequate preparation of the bowel is essential for accurate colonoscopic examination. We compared colonic preparation with sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate (SPS-Mg) with sulphate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage (PEG-EL) solution before colonoscopy, for quality of bowel cleansing, patient discomfort, and side effects. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either 3 sachets of SPS-Mg (16.5 g each) (n = 39) or 3 L of PEG-EL (n = 29) on the day before colonoscopy. Shortly before the procedure each patient was interviewed to determine the degree of discomfort (1 = none or mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and side effects. The quality of bowel cleansing was graded by a gastroenterologist who was unaware of the method of preparation (from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent). RESULTS: Of the 29 PEG-EL patients, four (14%) did not complete the preparation because of side effects. The degree of discomfort was significantly greater with PEG-EL (mean score, 2.3 +/- 0.7) than with SPS-Mg (mean score, 1.4 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Nausea and vomiting were significantly more common in the PEG-EL group (38% vs 13%; p < 0.05). Using intention-to-treat analysis, bowel cleansing proved to be significantly better with SPS-Mg than with PEG-EL (mean score +/- SD, 3.05 +/- 0.9 and 2.57 +/- 1.0, respectively; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Colonic preparation with SPS-Mg is better tolerated, associated with significantly fewer side effects, and results in higher quality bowel cleansing than preparation with PEG-EL.     

Possibility of different cancer development between the proximal and distal colon: comparison of the distribution between adenomatous polyps and cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of adenomatous polyps with that of cancer in the colon by using adenomatous polyps removed by colonoscopy. METHODOLOGY: 1223 adenomatous polyps removed by an endoscopic polypectomy were compared with 226 colon cancers with regard to their distribution, size and age. RESULTS: With patients over 65 years of age, the incidence of adenomatous polyps was lower in the proximal colon than in the distal colon, however, the incidence of cancer was higher in the proximal colon than in the distal colon (p<0.05). The distribution of adenomatous polyps according to size was also significantly different between the proximal and distal colon (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These results thus suggest that some difference may exist in cancer development between the proximal and distal colon.     

CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) CT colonography and three-dimensional (3D) virtual colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy in patients who have suspected colorectal neoplasms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were studied (eight women and 12 men; mean age, 53 years; range, 42-85 years). All patients had findings on conventional colonoscopy suggestive of colorectal carcinoma and underwent colonic CT within 3 hr of endoscopy. Two-dimensional CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy images were generated from the same data set that was obtained from thin-section helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis after rectal insufflation of room air. Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy images were obtained by downloading CT data to a workstation equipped with commercially available software. Volume- and perspective-rendering techniques were used to achieve interactive, 3D virtual "fly-through" examinations of the colonic mucosa. The results of 2D CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy were compared with the findings of conventional colonoscopy and correlated with surgical and pathologic outcome where possible. RESULTS: Twenty masses (defined as intraluminal projections 2 cm or larger in diameter) and 15 polyps (defined as projections smaller than 2 cm in diameter) were identified in our study group. All masses and 14 of 15 polyps were successfully shown on 2D colonography. Three findings of polyps on 2D colonography were false-positive, and one was false-negative. Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy revealed 19 of 20 masses and 13 of 15 polyps. On conventional colonoscopy, all 20 masses and 13 of 15 polyps were identified, with one false-positive finding of a malignant stricture in a normal colon. Complete examination of the colon was possible in 18 of 20 patients using the 2D technique and in 17 of 20 patients using 3D virtual colonoscopy, whereas conventional colonoscopy showed the entire colon in only 12 of 20 patients. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CT colonography and 3D virtual colonoscopy are complementary and effective techniques for examining the colon in patients with suspected colorectal carcinoma. CT techniques offer several advantages over conventional colonoscopy including the ability to detect abnormalities proximal to obstructing carcinomas, accurate localization of abnormalities within the colon, and good patient tolerance. These CT techniques may play an important role in future diagnosis of colorectal cancer and for screening patients at risk.     

Prospective evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron deficiency and no systemic or gastrointestinal symptoms or signs

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract is commonly performed to evaluate iron deficiency, little data is available regarding the underlying causes, yield of evaluation, and long-term outcome for those in whom gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms and signs are absent. METHODS: In- or out-patients seen by the gastroenterology consultative service at a large inner-city hospital over a 56-month period were considered eligible for the study when iron deficiency (serum ferritin <50 ng/mL) was documented. Exclusion criteria included: any gastrointestinal or systemic symptoms/signs, radiographic or endoscopic examinations of the gastrointestinal tract within 3 and 5 years, respectively, or obvious source of blood loss. Patients underwent colonoscopy and if no lesions other than carcinoma were found, upper endoscopy was then performed with a pediatric colonoscope. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were evaluated (mean age, 66 +/- 13 years; range, 20 to 89 years; 32 men/20 women). At the time of evaluation, the mean (+/-SD) hematocrit was 25% +/- 7% (range, 14% to 42%). Overall, 23 patients (44%; 95% CI 30% to 59%) had an identifiable gastrointestinal lesion considered the cause of iron deficiency, including: colonic carcinoma, 11 (21%); colonic and/or esophagogastric/duodenal vascular ectasias, 9 (17%); and gastric carcinoma, colonic polyposis, and colonic ulcers in 1 patient each. Long-term follow-up (median 24 months, range 2 to 63 months) identified only 1 patient with a cause found (colonic carcinoma), and in this patient, complete colonoscopy was not technically possible at the time of initial evaluation. There were no clinical or laboratory features that distinguished patients with an etiology for iron deficiency to the idiopathic group. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients with iron deficiency in whom gastrointestinal or systemic signs or symptoms are absent have an underlying gastrointestinal lesion. Nevertheless, despite a thorough endoscopic evaluation, some patients will have no etiology found; the prognosis for these patients is excellent.     

Colonoscopic polypectomy

The colonoscopic management of 86 patients with polypoid lesions of bleeding from the colon of intermittent nature is discussed. There were 145 polyps found in 85 of these patients. Adenomatous polyps occurring in the sigmoid colon above the reach of the standard sigmoidoscope was the most common finding and pathological diagnosis. Adenocarcinoma of the colon occurred in two patients and invasive carcinoma of a polyp was found in three other patients. Five other patients had polyps that demonstrated a carcinoma in situ. The definitive treatment of these complicated polyps is outlined. The importance of barium enema examination on follow-up of polyp and carcinoma patients and on patients with polyps found at standard sigmoidoscopy is stressed. The possibility of colonoscopic follow-up in lieu of colectomy and ileoproctostomy is suggested for patients with multiple polyps of the colon who do not belong to the familial polyposis group.     

Rifabutin versus placebo in combination with three drugs in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in patients with AIDS

OBJECTIVE: Most endoscopic perforations of the colon occur in the rectosigmoid area and are thought to be secondary to direct injury from the endoscopic instrument. The aim of this study was to describe the mechanisms of injury and clinical outcome of endoscopic perforation involving the cecum. METHODS: Retrospective review of 6684 consecutive colonoscopic procedures performed at a university hospital over a 7-yr period. RESULTS: Colonoscopy was complicated by perforation in 0.22%. Five of the 15 perforations occurred in the cecum. The mean age of these five patients was 79.6 +/- 17.7 yr (mean +/- SD). Indications for the procedure were bleeding (n = 4) and suspected obstructing cecal mass (n = 1). Abnormal endoscopic findings included diverticulosis, vascular malformations, cecal ulcer/inflammation, mass, and polyps. Perforation was directly attributable to an ancillary procedure (three routine biopsies, one electrocautery) in the cecal area in four patients, and cecal pathology (inflammation, ulceration) was a contributing risk factor in three patients. Mortality was 80%. In contrast, a noncecal perforation usually occurred at the sigmoid region and was associated with technical difficulties, e.g., inability to traverse a stricture or reach the cecum. CONCLUSIONS: Routine forceps biopsy (without electrocautery) is an under-recognized cause of cecal perforation. Ancillary endoscopic interventions in the cecal region should be minimized in elderly patients with evidence of cecal inflammation. Pneumatic injury may be an additional risk factor for cecal perforation in patients with a colonic stricture or a tortuous colon.     

CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps

OBJECTIVE: We performed CT colonography in patients referred for conventional colonoscopy, interpreted the axial images, and used commercially available software to reconstruct endoluminal perspective views to differentiate polyps from folds. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined 44 patients (27 men and 17 women; mean age, 58 years old) with CT colonography by interpreting the axial images and using three-dimensional rendering for problem solving only. The CT scans were interpreted by two radiologists who were unaware of patients' histories as revealed by colonoscopic findings. The findings on colonography were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy to determine sensitivity, specificity, time spent on interpretation, and confidence of interpretation. RESULTS: Colonoscopy showed normal findings in 28 patients and 22 polyps in the remaining 16 patients. Six polyps were 8 mm or larger, three were 5-7 mm, and 13 were 5 mm or smaller. The findings of the two observers revealed an overall sensitivity of 50% and 38%, respectively, and a specificity of 93% and 86%, respectively. Sensitivity for polyps larger than 8 mm was 83% and specificity was 100% for both observers. The average amount of time spent on interpretation was 28 min 30 sec (range, 14-65 min). Both observers used the endoluminal view for differentiating folds from polyps in 23 (52%) of 44 patients, which had only minimal impact on interpretation time. CONCLUSION: CT colonography can be performed and the images interpreted using currently available hardware and software by initially using the axial images to search for polyps of significant size. Endoluminal views should be used only when necessary to help distinguish normal folds from fixed raised lesions that are suggestive of polyps.