首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
There is one nuclear power plant (NPP) in Lithuania – the Ignalina NPP – which is under decommissioning now. The Ignalina NPP has two units with RBMK-1500 reactors, which are the most powerful and the most advanced versions of RBMK-type reactor design. Unit 1 of the Ignalina NPP was shut down at the end of 2004 and Unit 2 was shut down at the end of 2009. RBMK is a water-cooled graphite-moderated channel-type power reactor and the decommissioning of these reactors faces specific challenges for proper characterisation and disposal of irradiated reactor graphite.Apart from radiological inventory, the spatial distribution of radionuclides in the reactor graphite is also very important because it could indicate the possibilities for decontamination/treatment of the irradiated graphite. This is important for consideration of the near surface disposal option for irradiated graphite, as without treatment it usually does not meet the waste acceptance criteria.Based on that, the work presented in this paper is focused on the modelling of the induced activity spatial distribution in the Ignalina NPP RBMK-1500 reactor graphite components: blocks and rings/sleeves. The modelling was performed with MCNP and SCALE computer codes and consisted of two mains stages: modelling of the neutron flux in the reactor graphite components, and then modelling of the neutron activation in them using the already modelled neutron flux. In such a way, the spatial induced activity distribution in the analysed reactor components was obtained. Modelling results show that the thermal neutron flux is more intensive in the outer radial regions of the graphite components and this, in general, results in higher induced activities there.  相似文献   

2.
The multiple pressure tube rupture (MPTR) issue in RBMK safety technology   总被引:5,自引:5,他引:0  
The RBMK core is constituted by more than one-thousand pressurized channels housed into stacked graphite blocks and connected at the bottom and at the top by small diameter (D) and long length (L) pipes (less than 0.01 and more than 10 m, respectively) that end up into headers and drum separators. Control valves are installed in the bottom lines. Due to the large L/D value and to the presence of valves and other geometric discontinuities along the lines connecting with the pressure channels, the Fuel Channel Blockage (FCB) event is possible and already occurred in two documented NPP events. Pressure tube rupture occurred in a third NPP event not originated by FCB. Previous investigations, have shown the relevance of these events for the safety technology, and the availability of proper computational technique for the analysis, see the first and the third companion paper in this journal issue, respectively.The occurrence of the FCB event remains undetected for a few tens of seconds because of the lack of full monitoring for the individual channels, fourth companion paper in this journal issue. Therefore, fission power continues to be produced in the absence of cooling. This brings in subsequent times to fuel rod overheating, pressure tube failure, damage of the neighbouring graphite brick and ejection of damaged fuel.Following the pressure tube rupture, reactor cavity pressurization, radioactivity release into the same area and change of fluid properties occur that allow the detection of the event and cause the reactor scram at a time of a few tens of seconds depending upon the channel working conditions and the severity of the blockage.Notwithstanding the [delayed] scram and the full capability of the reactor designed safety features to keep cooled the core, the multiple pressure tube rupture (MPTR) issue is raised. The question to be answered is whether the ‘explosion’ of the blocked pressure tube damages not only the neighbour graphite bricks but propagates to other channels causing the potential for several channel failure.In order to address the MPTR issue fuel channel thermal-hydraulics and three-dimensional (3D) neutron kinetics analyses have been performed, as well structural mechanics calculations for the graphite bricks and rings (graphite rings surround the pressure tube to accommodate for thermal and radiation induced expansions).The bases for the analysis and the results of the study are presented. The conclusion, not reported within a licensing based format, is that the MPTR consequences are not expected to be relevant for the safety of the RBMK installations. This is supported by the analysis of experiments performed at the TKR facility available at the EREC research Centre near Moscow.  相似文献   

3.
The RBMK (Russian acronym for ‘channeled large power reactor’)-1500 reactors at the Ignalina nuclear power plant (NPP) have a series of check valves in the main circulation circuit (MCC) that serve the coolant distribution in the fuel channels. In the case of a hypothetical guillotine break of pipelines upstream of the group distribution headers (GDH), the check valves and adjusted piping integrity is a key issue for the reactor safety during the rapid closure of check valve. An analysis of the waterhammer effect (i.e. the pressure pulse generated by the valves slamming closed) is needed. The thermal–hydraulic and structural analysis of waterhammer effects following the guillotine break of pipelines at the Ignalina NPP with RBMK-1500 reactors was conducted by employing the RELAP5 and PipePlus codes. Results of the analysis demonstrated that the maximum values of the pressure pulses generated by the check valve closure following the hypothetical accidents remain far below the value of pressure of the hydraulic tests, which are performed at the NPP and the risk of failure of the check valves or associated pipelines is low. Sensitivity analysis of pressure pulse dependencies on calculation time step and check valve closure time was performed. Results of RELAP5 calculations are benchmarked against waterhammer transient data obtained by employing structural mechanics code BOS fluids.  相似文献   

4.
This paper presents Ignalina NPP Unit 1 RBMK-1500 reactor core lifetime analysis. The closure of the gas gap between the pressure tubes and the graphite bricks is one of the criteria for the evaluation of the reactor core lifetime. The rate of closure of the approximately 1.5 mm gaps between the pressure tubes and the graphite is largely a function of accumulated fast neutron dose and graphite operating temperatures. The main task of this paper is development of strategy and methodology for gas gap closure evaluation.  相似文献   

5.
The Ignalina nuclear power plant (NPP) is a twin-unit with two RBMK-1500, graphite moderated, boiling water, multichannel reactors. The accident management guidelines for beyond design basis accidents (BDBAs) are in a stage of preparation at Ignalina NPP. The most challenging event from BDBAs is the unavailability of water sources for heat removal from fuel channels (FCs). Due to specific design of RBMK, there are a few possibilities for heat removal from reactor core by non-regular means: depressurisation of reactor cooling system (RCS) (if pressure in cooling circuit is high) and supply of water into cooling system from low pressure water sources, removal of heat from graphite stack by reactor gas circuit, removal of heat from reactor core using cooling circuit of control and protection system channels, etc. The possibility to remove the heat using cooling circuit of control and protection system channels looks very attractive, because the channels with control rods are cooled with water supplied by the system totally independent from the reactor cooling system. The heat from fuel channels, where heat is generated, through graphite columns is transferred in radial direction to cooled channels with control rods. Therefore, the heat removal from RBMK-1500 reactor core using control rods cooling circuit can be used as non-regular mean for reactor cool-down in case of BDBAs with loss of long-term heat removal from the core.  相似文献   

6.
Results of the Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant have shown that in the risk topography transients are dominating. Analysis has shown that failure of the long-term core cooling is the main contributor to the core damage frequency. However, the reactor core damage in the long-term indicates the potential opportunities for the accident management. The main goal of accident management is to avoid a multiple fuel channel rupture because considering the design of RBMK reactors the consequences of rupture of more than 11–16 FC at full pressure would be close to the consequences of Chernobyl accident. This paper presents a detailed thermal–hydraulic analysis of the accidents with the loss of long-term core cooling, performed using the RELAP5 model of Ignalina NPP reactor cooling circuit and safety systems. Different ways of potential accident management are discussed. On the basis of this analysis the accident management strategy was developed.  相似文献   

7.
The most dangerous beyond design basis accidents for RBMK reactors, leading to the worst consequences, are related to the loss of long-term heat removal from the core. Due to a specific design of RBMK, there are a few possibilities for heat removal from reactor core by non-regular means: removal of heat from graphite stack by reactor gas circuit, removal of heat from reactor core using control rods cooling circuit, depressurisation of reactor cooling system, supply of water into cooling system from low pressure water sources, etc. This paper presents the analysis of such heat removal by employing RELAP5, RELAP5-3D and RELAP/SCDAPSIM codes. The analysis was performed for Ignalina nuclear power plant with RBMK-1500 reactor. The analysis of result shows that the restoration of water supply into control rod channels enables to remove 10-30 MW of the generated heat from the reactor core. This amount of removed heat is comparable with reactor decay heat in long-term period and allows to slowdown the core heat-up process. However, the injection of water to reactor cooling system is considered as main strategy, which should be considered in RBMK-1500 accident management procedure.  相似文献   

8.
A comprehensive study has been completed in relation to the accident analysis of RBMK with key results documented in three companion papers in the present journal volume. The study also aimed at the comparison between selected accident analysis topics in Light Water Reactors (LWR) and RBMK. The relevance of the Fuel Channel Blockage (FCB) event within the area of accident analysis was confirmed. Owing to the probability of occurrence, also connected with the large number of channels, estimated in the order of 10−2/reactor/year, the FCB is actually part of the Design Basis Accidents (DBA) for the RBMK.In case the FCB is part of the DBA, a noticeable difference occurs in results from safety evaluations between LWR and RBMK: in the latter case, a DBA causes a loss of integrity for the pressure barrier and, though to a limited extent, damaged fuel overpasses such a barrier. The FCB event also causes contamination in reactor cavity and in selected parts of the overall confinement, damage in various graphite blocks and, even excluding the MPTR risk owing to the findings from the second companion paper in this journal volume, mechanical loads on neighbouring fuel channels, graphite stacks and reactor tank that need extensive examination before reactor restart.Therefore, a proposal has been formulated for performing the feasibility analysis for the design of a system denominated ICM (Individual Channel Monitoring). The goal of the ICM is the early detection of the FCB event and the triggering of scram in such a way to prevent pressure tube damage and, definitely, over-passing of the pressure barrier by molten or damaged fuel during a DBA situation.The ICM is based upon the signals of pressure-drop (or flow-rate) and fluid temperature transducers installed in the bottom and the upper parts of the fuel channels, respectively. The performed study shows that steam superheating at fuel channel outlet occurs early after the blockage event and the related temperature signal can be used to cause scram. The availability of sophisticate computational tools including the detailed neutron kinetic model for each core channel, made possible the preliminary conclusion of the study.  相似文献   

9.
D. Magallon   《Nuclear Engineering and Design》2006,236(19-21):1998-2009
The formation of corium debris as the result of fuel-coolant interaction (energetic or not) has been studied experimentally in the FARO and KROTOS facilities operated at JRC-Ispra between 1991 and 1999. Experiments were performed with 3–177 kg of UO2–ZrO2 and UO2–ZrO2–Zr melts, quenched in water at depth between 1 and 2 m, and pressure between 0.1 and 5.0 MPa. The effect of various parameters such as melt composition, system pressure, water depth and subcooling on the quenching processes, debris characteristics and thermal load on bottom head were investigated, thus, giving a large palette of data for realistic reactor situations.Available data related to debris coolability aspects in particular are:
• Geometrical configuration of the collected debris.
• Partition between loose and agglomerated (“cake”) debris.
• Particle size distribution with and without energetic interaction.
These data are synthesised in the present contribution.  相似文献   

10.
As part of the re-inspection of the reactor pressure vessel of the nuclear power plant, the low-frequency-eddy current technique was implemented during the 1995 outage. Since then, this inspection technique and the testing equipment have seen steady further development. Therefore, optimization of the entire testing system, including qualification based on the 1995 results, was conducted. The eddy current testing system was designed as a ten-channel test system with sensors having separate transmitter and receiver coils. The first qualification of the testing technique and sensors was performed using a single-channel system; a second qualification was then carried out using the new testing electronics. The sensor design allows for a simultaneous detection of surface and subsurface flaws. This assumes that testing is performed simultaneously using four frequencies. Data analysis and evaluation are performed using a digital multi-frequency regression analysis technique The detection limits determined using this technique led to the definition of the following recording limits for testing in which the required signal-to-noise ratio of 6 dB was reliably observed.
• Detection of surface connected longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• notch, 3 mm deep and 10 mm long, for weave bead cladding;
• notch, 2 mm deep and 20 mm long, for strip weld cladding.
• Detection of embedded planar longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• ligament of 7 mm for 8 mm clad thickness and 3 mm;
• ligament for 4 mm clad thickness, notch starting at the carbon steel base material with a length of 20 mm.
• Detection of embedded volumetric longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• 3 mm diameter side-drilled hole (SDH) for 8 mm clad thickness; ligament, 4 mm. For 4 mm clad thickness: diameter, 2 mm SDH; ligament, 2 mm. All SDHs are 55 mm deep.

Article Outline

1. Problem
2. Objective
3. Execution and results
3.1. Test instrument and electronics
3.2. Performance demonstration (qualification)
3.3. Summary of results and assessment of the qualification
3.4. Flaws open to the surface
3.5. Planar flaws in the cladding and sub-clad flaws
3.6. Volumetric flaws in the clad
3.7. Additional evaluations
4. Qualification results
5. Results from the 1999 outage

1. Problem

The reactor pressure vessel is equipped with a stainless steel (austenitic) cladding for corrosion protection. This cladding can only protect if no flaws are present at the surface or in the volume. The verification of the integrity of the cladding is currently conducted using state-of-the-art ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonic testing has an excellent capacity of proof for these types of flaws, but it generally cannot distinguish between flaws at the clad surface, in the clad volume, or at the clad-to-base material interface. Using the low-frequency (LF)-eddy current technique, these differences can be documented. For this reason, the LF-eddy current technique was developed and also supported by those who employ diverse testing technology in addition to ultrasonic testing for this type of testing.

2. Objective

The goal of the qualification described in this paper was the optimization and verification of the test procedure and test equipment based on the test systems currently used and, in addition, implementation of the results achieved with the newly built WS98 test electronics, a ten-channel eddy current testing system. The completion of the tasks should be performed in accordance with the ENIQ qualification guidelines. Following the successful qualification, the test system will be utilized during the 1999 reactor pressure vessel outage at the Stade nuclear power plant (KKS). The project started in August 1998, leaving approximately 6 months for the set-up of the equipment, system performance demonstration (qualification), and to compile the required documentation.

3. Execution and results

The following essential parameters for the qualification of the testing technique were determined by the test situation:
• sensor size of, maximum, 40 mm×40 mm×30 mm (L×W×H) for NF-absolute sensors;
• sensor size of, maximum, 60 mm×30 mm×30 mm for T/R sensors;
• frequency range, 0.5–20 kHz;
• effective coil width, ≥10 mm (6 dB drop);
• gain (amplification), up to 100 dB;
• long-term stability of the test instrument and electronics.

3.1. Test instrument and electronics

The eddy current instrument is designed for single-channel or multi-channel automated testing of the surface areas of piping systems, pressure vessels, and forgings for both mobile testing services in the field and also for use in stationary facilities in the area of manufacturing testing or inservice inspections.The instrument can easily be adapted to the requirements of the respective test situation due to its modular design. This is accomplished by increasing the testing electronics to the necessary number of sensor and/or frequency channels.The design of the eddy current electronics and the data flow can be seen in Fig. 1.  相似文献   

11.
The 2006 CHF look-up table   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
CHF look-up tables are used widely for the prediction of the critical heat flux (CHF). The CHF look-up table is basically a normalized data bank for a vertical 8 mm water-cooled tube. The 2006 CHF look-up table is based on a database containing more than 30,000 data points and provides CHF values at 24 pressures, 20 mass fluxes, and 23 qualities, covering the full range of conditions of practical interest. In addition, the 2006 CHF look-up table addresses several concerns with respect to previous CHF look-up tables raised in the literature. The major improvements of the 2006 CHF look-up table are:
• An enhanced quality of the database (improved screening procedures, removal of clearly identified outliers and duplicate data).
• An increased number of data in the database (an addition of 33 recent data sets).
• A significantly improved prediction of CHF in the subcooled region and the limiting quality region.
• An increased number of pressure and mass flux intervals (thus increasing the CHF entries by 20% compared to the 1995 CHF look-up table).
• An improved smoothness of the look-up table (the smoothness was quantified by a smoothness index).
A discussion of the impact of these changes on the prediction accuracy and table smoothness is presented. The 2006 CHF look-up table is characterized by a significant improvement in accuracy and smoothness.  相似文献   

12.
《Annals of Nuclear Energy》2004,31(15):1667-1708
This paper summarizes RELAP5-3D code validation activities carried out at the Lithuanian Energy Institute, which was performed through the modeling of RBMK-1500 specific transients taking place at Ignalina NPP. A best estimate RELAP5-3D model of the INPP RBMK-1500 reactor has been developed and validated against real plant data, as well as with the calculation results obtained using the Russian STEPAN/KOBRA code. The obtained calculation results demonstrate reasonable agreement with Ignalina NPP measured data. Behaviors of the separate MCC thermal-hydraulic parameters, as well as physical processes are predicted reasonably well to the real processes, occurring in the primary circuit of RBMK-1500 reactor. The calculated reactivity and the total reactor core power behavior in time are also in reasonable agreement with the measured plant data, which demonstrates the correct modeling of the neutronic processes taking place in RBMK-1500 reactor core. The performed validation of RELAP5-3D model of Ignalina NPP RBMK-1500 reactor allowed to improve the model, which in the future would be used for the safety substantiation calculations of RBMK-1500 reactors. Future activities are discussed.  相似文献   

13.
The objective of the high performance light water reactor (HPLWR) project is to assess the merit and economic feasibility of a high efficiency LWR operating at thermodynamically supercritical regime. An efficiency of approximately 44% is expected. To accomplish this objective, a highly qualified team of European research institutes and industrial partners together with the University of Tokyo is assessing the major issues pertaining to a new reactor concept, under the co-sponsorship of the European Commission. The assessment has emphasized the recent advancement achieved in this area by Japan. Additionally, it accounts for advanced European reactor design requirements, recent improvements, practical design aspects, availability of plant components and the availability of high temperature materials. The final objective of this project is to reach a conclusion on the potential of the HPLWR to help sustain the nuclear option, by supplying competitively priced electricity, as well as to continue the nuclear competence in LWR technology. The following is a brief summary of the main project achievements:
• A state-of-the-art review of supercritical water-cooled reactors has been performed for the HPLWR project.
• Extensive studies have been performed in the last 10 years by the University of Tokyo. Therefore, a ‘reference design’, developed by the University of Tokyo, was selected in order to assess the available technological tools (i.e. computer codes, analyses, advanced materials, water chemistry, etc.). Design data and results of the analysis were supplied by the University of Tokyo. A benchmark problem, based on the ‘reference design’ was defined for neutronics calculations and several partners of the HPLWR project carried out independent analyses. The results of these analyses, which in addition help to ‘calibrate’ the codes, have guided the assessment of the core and the design of an improved HPLWR fuel assembly.
• Preliminary selection was made for the HPLWR scale, boundary conditions, core and fuel assembly design, reactor pressure vessel, containment, turbine and balance of plant.
• A review of potentially applicable materials for the HPLWR was completed and a preliminary selection of potential in-vessel and ex-vessel candidate materials was made.
• A thorough review of heat transfer at supercritical pressures was completed together with a thermal-hydraulics analysis of potential HPLWR sub-channels. This analytical tool supports the core and fuel assembly design.
• The RELAP5 and the CATHARE 2 codes are being upgraded to supercritical pressures. Thus they can be used to support the HPLWR core design and to perform plant safety analyses.
• Assessment of the HPLWR design constraints, based on current LWR technology was documented. This document stresses the various criteria that must be satisfied in the design (e.g. material, temperature, power, safety criteria, etc.) based on experience gained in the design of PWR.
• Preliminary economic assessment concluded that the HPLWR has the potential to be economically competitive. However, an accurate assessment can only be done after the HPLWR design has been fixed. A more accurate economic assessment may be performed after the conclusion of this project.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Approach
3. Project objectives and work program
4. Main achievements
4.1. Heat transfer at supercritical pressures
4.2. Cladding materials
4.3. Core design
4.4. Reactor pressure vessel design
4.5. Overall plant concept
4.6. Transient safety analyses
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References

1. Introduction

In view of continuous industrial expansion in industrially developed countries, the need to accelerate the development of underdeveloped countries, the deregulation of electric utilities, the desire to reduce global warming (believed to be directly related to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and therefore to be caused by combustion of fossil fuel)—there is a renewed prospect that nuclear energy will once again be in demand. Evidence of this trend is already seen in the United States. During the last 3 years, the US Department of Energy (US DOE) has led an ambitious program, named Generation IV nuclear reactors, with the main objective to help revitalize the nuclear energy option. In order for nuclear energy to be a viable economical option, there is also a continuing need to improve the economics and efficiency of light water reactors (LWR) similarly to the improvements made in fossil power plants.The concept in this HPLWR project, as described by Heusener et al., 2000a and Heusener et al., 2000b, involves an LWR operating in thermodynamically supercritical regime. In a once-through thermodynamic cycle, the water enters the reactor as water and exits as high-pressure steam without change of phase. Consequently, it is expected that this may lead to a simplified plant design. The concept of the once-through supercritical-pressure light water cooled reactor has been studied by the University of Tokyo over the past decade, as reported by Oka and Koshizuka, 1996 and Oka and Koshizuka, 1998, Dobashi et al. (1998), and Lee et al. (1999). It has been reviewed by the Tokyo Electric Power Company and other Japanese industrial companies, and reported by Tanaka et al. (1997). The main advantages of a reactor cooled and moderated by supercritical water are that above the critical pressure of water (22.1 MPa) supercritical water does not exhibit a change of phase and the heat is effectively removed at or above the pseudo-critical temperature that corresponds to the boiling point at sub-critical pressure (385 °C at 25 MPa). Thus, steam-water separation is not necessary at the core exit and the turbines can be driven directly by the high temperature coolant leaving the core.On the other hand, the development of this reactor concept has to account for the high temperatures that are expected to be achieved as well as for the large axial density gradient within the core. Therefore additional research and development effort is expected to be devoted in particular to these areas.As an example of such a system operating at 25 MPa, the coolant enters the core at 280 °C. It exceeds the pseudo-critical temperature as it flows upward through the core and it exits the core at 508 °C directly into the steam turbines. The thermal efficiency of such a cycle is approximately 44% and is strongly affected by the core outlet temperature (see Fig. 1). The development effort carried out by Dobashi et al. (1998) has been primarily conceptual in nature and has pointed out the potential merit of the once-through concept. By using these results as a starting point, it is possible to reach a conclusion on whether or not the once-through supercritical-pressure LWR is economically and physically a viable solution that may help sustain the nuclear option. Because of the expected high efficiency, high-temperature, high-pressure and high power density we have named this concept high performance light water reactor (HPLWR).  相似文献   

14.
Does an HTR need a containment – pressure resistant – or is it possible – licensable – to have only a so-called confinement.The answer depends on both the results of the safety analysis of the accidents considered in the design and the acceptance by the licensing authorities and the public of a safety approach only based on severe core damage exclusion.The safety approach to be developed for modular HTRs must describe the application of the defence in depth principle for such reactors. Whatever the requirements on the last confinement barrier could be, a convincing demonstration of the exclusion of any severe core damage is needed, relying on exhaustive and bounding considerations of severe core damage initiators and the use of non-questionable arguments.The paper presents the containment issues for HTRs based on German experience background and considerations for modern modular HTR safety approach including beyond design situations.
• For the German HTRs (designed in the 80s), it could be shown in the licensing procedures in Germany that there was no need for a pressure retaining and gas tight containment to enclose radioactive nuclides released from the nuclear heat source. Instead, the confinement envelope acted in conjunction with other barriers to minimize the release of radioactive nuclides and the radiological impact on the environment.
• The confinement envelope consisted of the reactor building, a sub-atmospheric pressure system, a building pressure relief system, an HVAC systems isolation and a filtration system.
• During a major depressurization accident, unfiltered releases were discharged to the environment. The analyses results show that the environmental impact was far below the dose limits according to the German Radiological Protection Ordinance, even when the effect of filters was not taken into account.
• The demonstration strongly relied on the assumptions made for the source term definition, e.g. the fuel particles failure rates (under irradiation and during accidental conditions), the diffusion data, the dust data and the deposition/lift-off mechanisms.
• For modern modular HTRs, the last confinement barrier performances will have to be determined in accordance with the set of accidents to be considered in the design including internal and external hazards and the limits targeted for the public and the environment protection.
Further more the paper presents an analysis of effects of a deliberate crash of a large commercial airliner on a former German HTR design.  相似文献   

15.
The code system, SEMER, was recently developed to evaluate the economic impact of various nuclear reactors and associated innovations. Models for nearly all fossil energy-based systems were also included to provide a basis for cost comparisons.Essentially, SEMER includes three types of model libraries: the global model, for a rapid estimation of various nuclear and fossil energy-based systems, the detailed models, for the finer cost evaluation of individual components and circuits in a PWR type of reactor and the fuel cycle models, for PWRS, HTRs and FBRs, allowing the cost estimations related to all the steps in the nuclear fuel cycle, including reprocessing and disposal.This paper summarises our on-going investigations on new developments in, and on the validation of, the SEMER system.Details of the modelling principles, and the results of validation carried out in the context of an EDF/CEA Joint Protocol Agreement, are also presented.First results of this validation are highly encouraging:
• Relative errors for the total kWh or overnight and investment costs are less than 5% for large PWR systems operating in France or other countries.
• These errors are less than 3% for small-sized compact PWRs and they are of the order of 4–7% for HTRs (as compared to IAEA estimations).
• For fossil energy-based power plants, the relative error, even with slightly different cost breakdown between SEMER and that of existing installations, is from 5 to 20%.
• Similarly, errors on the nuclear fuel cycle costs are about 1–4%, compared to published reference values.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The models
2.1. The global models
2.2. The detailed models
2.3. The fuel cycle model
3. Cost modelling principles
3.1. Input data and output
3.1.1. Input data
3.1.2. Output
3.1.3. Interest during construction
3.2. An illustrative example of power cost calculations
4. The fuel cycle model
4.1. An illustrative example of fuel cycle calculations
5. Validation
5.1. Validation results for nuclear reactors
5.2. More recent validation of operating power plants
5.3. Circuits, tubes and components
5.4. Fuel cycle costs comparisons
6. Conclusions
References

1. Introduction

This paper describes some of the salient features of the economic evaluation models, integrated in CEA’s code system, SEMER (Système d’Evaluation et de Modélisation Economique de Réacteurs).The basic aim of this development is to furnish top management and project leaders a simple tool for cost evaluations enabling the choice of competitive technological options.In the particular context of CEA’s R&D innovative programme, it was imperative to include this economic dimension in order to assess the economic interest of the proposed innovations and to search for other promising areas of R&D, leading to nuclear power cost reductions.SEMER is actually used in the form of a totally machine-independent and user friendly interface in the JAVA language.

2. The models

There are three distinct categories of models in the SEMER system.

2.1. The global models

These models are designed for a quick overall economic estimation. Current version of SEMER includes models for:
Nuclear power plants, such as PWR of the 1400 MWe type (double confinement and four loops), PWR of the 900 MWe type (single confinement, three loops), HTGR (high temperature, gas-cooled reactor), LTR (integral nuclear reactor for heat production), NP (compact PWR) and PWR-C (modular integral PWR such as the SIR concept).
Conventional, fossil energy-based power plants, such as pulverised (or fluidised bed), coal-fired plant, with desulphurisation treatment, oil-fired plant, gas-fired plant and diesel plants of all types. Also included are gas turbine plants, plant with a simple gas turbine, plant with a combined cycle gas turbine (“indoor” and “outdoor” constructions).

2.2. The detailed models

This option allows detailed cost estimations by individual modelling of reactor components, circuits and associated buildings, etc. In the present version, only the following models for PWR are available:
Reactor components, such as civil engineering of associated buildings and structures, reactor vessel, steam generator with U-tubes, steam generator with straight tubes, the pressuriser, primary circuit pumps, the travelling crane, cooling tower, cooling tower with mechanical ventilation, turbine-driven pumps, pump motors, centrifugal pumps, air ejectors, heat exchanger casing, special tubes in stainless steel and special tubes in black steel, with internal coating in stainless steel.
Reactor circuits, including: (1) basic circuits, such as primary circuit connecting the core, pressuriser, primary pumps and steam generator and secondary circuit connecting the steam generators and turbines; and (2) auxiliary circuits, such as steam generators blow-off circuit, steam generator emergency feed-water circuit, confinement spray system, chemical and volumetric control system, emergency core cooling system, component cooling system, water make-up and boron circuit, nuclear sampling system, drain, vent and exhaust circuits, residual heat removal system, effluent control and rejection system and diverse other circuits inside and outside the reactor building.
For the economic evaluation of an innovative PWR, the detailed models allow to take into account the specificities of the new concept and thus bring corrections to the global model, available in the SEMER library and considered having the closest analogies to the innovative PWR to be evaluated. This approach was used in Nisan et al. (2002) to evaluate the AP-600.

2.3. The fuel cycle model

In addition to the above, SEMER also incorporates a detailed model for the fuel cycle cost calculations of a nuclear reactor, treating all the stages of the nuclear fuel cycle from ore extraction to ultimate disposal, with the following options:
• Uranium oxide (UOX) cores.
• 100% mixed, uranium–plutonium oxide (MOX) cores.
• Cores with first loading in UOX, then equilibrium core in MOX.
• Mixed cores with x% MOX fuelled assemblies (under development).
• HTR cores and fast reactor (EFR type) cores.
Several options regarding the treatment of the fuel cycle front- and back-ends are also available:
• Global treatment as in the IAEA WREBUS study (IAEA, 1992).
• Detailed treatment as in the OECD study (OECD, 1994). This is the default option.
• A combination of the above, with a semi-detailed calculations, including the specific treatment and costs for B and C type of wastes, as used by the French Ministry of Industry, DIGEC and by EDF (DIGEC, 1997).
• The CEA model, derived from feed-back of experience for front- and back-end operations.
It should be noted that the standard OECD option includes all the steps in the fuel cycle from the mine to final disposal. The WREBUS option only considers a global value for the fuel cycle back-end. The EDF model (detailed in Table 10) is in between. Finally, in the CEA model, all the costs concerning the front-end, the fabrication and enrichment and the back-end (reprocessing, then final disposal) are expressed as polynomial expressions derived from the costs of a large number of real cases.

3. Cost modelling principles

The basic principle governing the development of models in the SEMER system is the fact that, for most projects, especially in their preliminary phases, it is sufficient to first make a relative cost estimation by the simplest and fastest methods available. The results obtained are then further refined in the final stages of the project when relevant choices of options and technologies are almost fixed. The only condition is that consistent estimating techniques be used so that alternatives can be compared on the same basis, and comparisons can also be made between competing projects.This principle was first used in the chemical and petrochemical industries where continued development over several decades has produced simple but powerful methods for cost evaluations (Popper, 1970).These methods were adapted to nuclear reactors and further developed at CEA during the last 20 years. They have been successfully applied, in particular for the cost assessment of nuclear submarine reactors, operating large-sized PWRs, new small- and medium-sized reactor concepts as well as for a variety of technologies and components, utilising nuclear or fossil energies.The basic steps involved in the development of such methods are:
1. The power plant cost is first carefully decomposed into several “cost modules”. This method was first proposed in the early 1970s for chemical plant cost estimations (Guthrie and Grace, 1970). An estimating module represents a group of cost elements (or items) having similar characteristics and relationships. Each of these elements can be made to represent a given function in the overall module (e.g. site acquisition and development, major process equipment such as a heat exchanger, a pressure vessel, etc.).
2. A detailed study is then made to make an inventory of the various generic models1 which bear a sufficient number of analogies with the module that one would like to assess. Thus, for example, the cost evaluation model for the PWR pressure vessel was developed from the available models for the stainless steel lined high pressure reservoirs used in the industry.
3. The cost Ci of an element i in a given module is then mathematically expressed in the form of simple equations of the type:
(1)
Ci=Ai+(Bi×Pin)
where A, B and n are the so-called “adjustment coefficients” and P is power or capacity (electric power of a reactor, for example).
4. The adjustment coefficients are then obtained by applying well-known mathematical techniques (a least-squares fit of a data base, for example) for a large number of values for P.
5. To qualify the algorithms, developed as above, the models are more finely tuned from the results of published data, taking into account the use of field materials, field labour and other industrial factors.
6. Finally, a validation of the model is undertaken by comparison with the “real” values from existing installations.
The SEMER system was basically developed for the assessment of innovations in reactor systems, made in the context of the French Nuclear Power Programme. The adjustment coefficients were then obtained from available data bases for experimental, operating or nuclear submarine PWRs and the fossil energy-based electricity producing systems. This is the main reason that the basic costs of most items need to be expressed in French Francs (FF) which are then converted into Euros or US dollars. Some information on other reactor types, e.g. HTRs, was also obtained from external sources such as the IAEA. In its current form, SEMER remains nonetheless highly oriented towards PWR type of technology.However, because of the inherent generic nature of the built in models, they can be easily adapted to treat other reactor systems. One could, for example, use the model for combined cycle gas turbines, to develop part of the models for HTRs with direct cycles.

3.1. Input data and output

3.1.1. Input data
Efforts were made to harmonise the input and output data for all power plant types, with only minor and easily comprehensible modifications in the input data.Examples of input data panels, for the global models of a nuclear reactor and a fossil fuelled plant, are summarised in Table 1.  相似文献   

16.
The possibility is examined of developing a vessel-type fast reactor cooled by water with supercritical parameters (BR-VSP) and a channel-type fast plutonium–water reactor cooled by boiling water, using the RBMK scheme, or water with supercritical parameters for burning weapons or power-production plutonium (RBMK-Pu).A reactor with construction similar to that of an RBMK reactor but without the graphite moderator and zirconium can be used for burning plutonium. Removing the graphite masonry while retaining a 25-cm spacing in the square lattice gives a large free volume in the neutron field for holding, for example, cobalt. A neutron-physical substantiation is given for the serviceability of such a reactor with the maximum burnup of removed fuel 10% h.a. and the possibility of obtaining a negative reactivity effect in the case of water loss.  相似文献   

17.
This article presents the concept of a storage facility used to effect power control in South Africa's PBMR power cycle. The concept features a multiple number of storage vessels whose purpose is to contain the working medium, helium, as it is withdrawn from the PBMR's closed loop power cycle, at low energy demand. This helium is appropriately replenished to the power cycle as the energy demand increases. Helium mass transfer between the power cycle and the storage facility, henceforth known as the inventory control system (ICS), is carried out by way of the pressure differential that exists between these two systems. In presenting the ICS concept, emphasis is placed on storage effectiveness; hence the discussion in this paper is centred on those features which accentuate storage effectiveness, namely:
• Storage vessel multiplicity;
• Unique initial pressures for each vessel arranged in a cascaded manner; and
• A heat sink placed in each vessel to provide thermal inertia.
Having presented the concept, the objective is to qualitatively justify the presence of each of the above-mentioned features using thermodynamics as a basis.  相似文献   

18.
A stress analysis for a hypothetical nuclear graphite moderator brick is presented, considering dimensional and other property changes due to fast neutron irradiation, to illustrate the relationship between the change in moderator brick bore profile and dimensional change of the material. The results give the stresses and deformations of the brick during operation and at shutdown, with the effect of irradiation creep on the deformation of the brick also considered. The analyses provide information useful to reactor designers and operators for planning graphite monitoring campaigns.  相似文献   

19.
In the framework of the French V/HTR fuel development and qualification program, the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA) and AREVA are conducting R&D projects covering the mastering of UO2 coated particle and fuel compact fabrication technology. To fulfill this task, a review of past knowledge, of existing technologies and a preliminary laboratory-scale work program have been conducted with the aim of retrieving the know-how on HTR coated particle and compact manufacture:
• The different stages of UO2 kernel fabrication GSP process have been reviewed, reproduced and improved.
• The experimental conditions for the chemical vapor deposition of coatings have been defined on dummy kernels and development of innovative characterization methods has been carried out.
• Former CERCA compacting process has been reviewed and updated.
In parallel, an experimental manufacturing line for coated particles, named GAIA, and a compacting line based on former CERCA compacting experience have been designed, constructed and are in operation since early 2005 at CEA Cadarache and CERCA Romans, respectively. These two facilities constitute the CAPRI line (CEA and AREVA PRoduction Integrated line).The major objectives of the CAPRI line are:
• to recover and validate past knowledge,
• to produce representative HTR TRISO fuel meeting industrial standards,
• to permit the optimization of reference fabrication processes for kernels and coatings defined previously at a laboratory-scale and the investigation of alternative and innovative fuel design (UCO kernel, ZrC coating),
• to test alternative compact process options and
• to fabricate and characterize fuel required for irradiation and qualification purpose.
This paper presents the status of progress of R&D conducted on HTR fuel particles and compact manufacture by early 2005 and the potential of the laboratory-scale HTR fuel CAPRI line.  相似文献   

20.
The analysis of experimental data and results of calculations for heat transfer crisis in heated channels under low upward coolant mass flux densities is presented. This analysis allows the determination of the basic features of the boiling crisis phenomenon. It is shown that the methods currently used for critical heat flux (CHF) prediction have insufficient accuracy in the given range of parameters. A new relationship for the CHF calculation is presented. It should be used for the water–water energy reactor (WWER) and uran–graphite channel reactor—Chernobyl-type (RBMK) rod bundles, and is verified by the test data. The comparison of results obtained by a new CHF correlation and the relationship used in RELAP5/MOD3.1 Code is presented. It is shown that the latter overpredicts the CHF values at atmospheric pressure and for xcr>0.4 and does not provide conservative estimations for the RBMK fuel bundles.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号