Modified oral ondansetron regimen for cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of a modified regimen of oral ondansetron and dexamethasone in patients with lupus nephritis undergoing treatment with cyclophosphamide whose conventional antiemetic regimen had failed. DESIGN: A before-after prospective observational pilot project. SETTING: A federal research hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen outpatients with lupus nephritis receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide 0.75-1.0 g/m2 had previously experienced chemotherapy-induced emetic events (vomiting or retching) while receiving a standard combination intravenous antiemetic regimen. The regimen consisted of four doses of thiethylperazine 10 mg and diphenhydramine 25 mg every 6 hours, and two doses of lorazepam 0.5 mg every 6 hours starting at 1 hour prior to cyclophosphamide. A subset of 8 patients previously completed a blinded study in which they received the intravenous formulation of ondansetron (4 doses of 4-16 mg q4h) administered orally beginning 30 minutes prior to the cyclophosphamide infusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of emetic events and cost of drug administration were assessed for the modified ondansetron intervention and compared with those of the standard antiemetic regimen. The incidence of emetic events and visual analog nausea scores for the subset of eight patients were also evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: To account for the delayed onset of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide, patients received both ondansetron 8 mg orally every 4 hours (3 doses) and dexamethasone 10 mg orally (1 dose) beginning 4 hours after the cyclophosphamide infusion. This is different from the manufacturer's recommended dose schedule, in which ondansetron is administered prior to chemotherapy. RESULTS: No emetic events were observed following the administration of oral ondansetron/dexamethasone. The 95% confidence interval for the true rate of emesis was 0% to 19.3%. There was a significant difference in efficacy between ondansetron/dexamethasone and the triple antiemetic regimen (p < 0.0002). None of the patients experienced adverse effects while receiving the ondansetron/dexamethasone regimen. Cost comparisons (including admixture and nursing administration times) for standard combination therapy and oral ondansetron/dexamethasone were $109.09 and $70.24, respectively. No difference in emetic events or nausea ratings was observed between oral ondansetron/dexamethasone tablets and oral administration of ondansetron using the intravenous formula. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a modified oral ondansetron/dexamethasone regimen is safe and efficacious, and costs less than alternative regimens to prevent cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in patients with lupus nephritis.     

Familial inv(X) (p22q22): ovarian dysgenesis in two sisters with del Xq and fertility in one male carrier

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antiemetic efficacy and safety of adding the dopamine antagonist prochlorperazine to the combination of granisetron and dexamethasone in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting following high-dose cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients receiving cisplatin (> or = 75 mg/m2) (median dose = 100 mg/m2) were enrolled at three sites. Patients received prochlorperazine spansule 15 mg orally, 60 minutes prior to and 12 hours after cisplatin; dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously, 45 minutes prior to cisplatin, and 10 mg intravenously or orally, 12 hours after cisplatin; and granisetron 10 micrograms/kg intravenously, 30 minutes prior to cisplatin. Efficacy was assessed during the 24-hour period after cisplatin using complete antiemetic response (no emetic episodes and no rescue antiemetics) and patient assessment of nausea and satisfaction using 100-mm visual analog scales (nausea: 0 = none, 100 = nausea as bad as it can be; satisfaction: 0 = not at all satisfied, 100 = satisfied as can be). RESULTS: Complete response (0 emetic episodes) was noted in 84% (49/58) of patients. Forty-two patients (72%) experienced no nausea. The mean change in posttreatment nausea visual analog scales from baseline was 8.9 mm. Forty-eight patients (83%) were completely satisfied with their antiemetic treatment. The mean posttreatment patient satisfaction score was 92 mm. Treatment was well tolerated, with infrequent and minor adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This three-drug antiemetic regimen is well tolerated and highly effective in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting arising from high-dose cisplatin. Further studies evaluating this regimen are warranted.     

A lymphoma cell line resistant to 4-piperidinopiperidine was less sensitive to CPT-11

The purpose of the study was to assess the toxicity and efficacy of an oral, combination antiemetic regimen including granisetron (Kytril; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA) in the setting of highly emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy for stem cell transplantation. Antiemetic prophylaxis consisted of oral granisetron 2 mg once daily, oral prochlorperazine 10 mg q 6 h and oral dexamethasone 4 mg q 6 h, beginning 1 h prior to chemotherapy on each of the 4 days of chemotherapy and continuing until 24 h after the completion of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients received either CVP (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, VP-16 1800 mg/m2 and carboplatin 1200 mg/m2) or CTP (thiotepa 500 mg/m2 in place of VP-16) in four daily doses given over 4 h from days -4 to -1. Previously mobilized and cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were reinfused on day +1. Evaluation of nausea, emetic episodes (EE), adverse events, and rescue medications were recorded on a daily patient diary. Thirty-six patients were entered. Fifty-three percent (95% CI = 37-75%) of patients achieved complete response for emesis (CR = 0 EE/24 h) and 75% (95% CI = 58-90%) had combined complete and major response (CR+MR = 0-3 EE/24 h) during all 5 of the treatment days. During the 5 study days, the average number of patient-days with no emesis was 3.7 (74%) and with 1-3 EE was 4.3 (86%). On days -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0, the combined CR+MR rate for emesis was 97, 92, 86, 78 and 75%, respectively. Nausea was absent or mild on all 5 study days in 57% (95% CI = 37-75%). Eight patients had severe late-onset emesis occurring on days +1 to +3 after reinfusion of stem cells. No clinically significant toxicities attributable to the antiemetic regimen were observed. An all oral antiemetic regimen of granisetron, prochlorperazine and dexamethasone appears to be safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple, daily, high-dose chemotherapy regimens. This regimen offers the advantage of cost-savings, a low side-effect profile and ease of administration in the predominately outpatient setting of HDC with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT).     

Outcome of lithium prophylaxis: a prospective follow-up of affective disorder patients assigned to high and low serum lithium levels

Recently, the availability of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antagonists has provided better protection from chemotherapy-induced emesis. These drugs, in combination with dexamethasone, are more expensive but more cost-effective than the alternative antiemetic regimens in the prevention of acute emesis induced by high single dose and low and repeated doses of cisplatin and, probably, of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. In the prevention of emesis induced by oral cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil and in the prevention of delayed emesis induced by cisplatin and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, the most cost-effective choices are represented, respectively, by a combination of intravenous dexamethasone on day 1 and 8 plus 14-day oral metoclopramide (a combination of oral dexamethasone plus metoclopramide and oral dexamethasone alone). In all cases, the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antagonists should be used only in patients in whom the most cost-effective antiemetic regimens either fail or are not tolerated.     

Treatment of cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting with a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide: a pilot study

Forty chemotherapy-naive patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were included in a pilot study of a combination of ondansetron plus metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy. Patients received ondansetron 16 mg plus metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg in 250 cm3 of normal saline i.v. 15 min before cisplatin administration on day 1; then ondansetron 8 mg was given orally b.i.d. and metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg was given intramuscularly t.i.d. for 4 days. This combination was given to all patients receiving the first cycle of chemotherapy. At the second cycle of chemotherapy all patients received the same antiemetic treatment as above plus methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. on day 1 and the intramuscularly once a day for 4 days. There were 20 females and 20 males with a mean performance status of 1 (range 0-2) and a mean age of 58 years (range 36-68). Ten patients had ovarian carcinoma, eight patients had uterine adenocarcinoma and 22 and non-small cell lung carcinoma. The mean cisplatin dose was 96 mg/m2. All patients denied significant alcohol consumption. At cycle 1, complete protection against acute emesis was achieved in 22 patients (55%), major protection in 12 cases (30%), minor protection in four patients (10%) and failure in two cases (5%). On the other hand, the efficacy of this combination on delayed vomiting was not striking. For delayed vomiting, complete protection was observed in nine patients (23%), major protection in 13 cases (33%), minor protection in 10 patients (25%) and failure in eight cases (20%). At cycle 2, patients also received methylprednisolone showing complete protection from vomiting in 19 cases (47%) and major protection on 12 cases (30%). Results achieved with ondansetron plus metoclopramide are in the range reported for ondansetron alone in the medical literature. Although this study was not prospectively carried out in a randomized fashion, the results are not suggestive of a possible positive effect of metoclopramide addition to ondansetron. On the other hand, these results stress the role that corticosteroids may play in the control of delayed emesis. Toxicity was predictable and the frequency of side-effects was in the range reported in other studies with ondansetron.     

The effects of dexamethasone on antiemetics in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery

This randomized, double-blind study compared the effects of dexamethasone plus either droperidol, metoclopramide, or granisetron with each antiemetic alone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 270 female patients undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either droperidol 1.25 mg (Group D1, n = 45), droperidol 1.25 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group D2, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg (Group M1, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group M2, n = 45), granisetron 40 micrograms/kg (Group G1, n = 45), or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group G2, n = 45) immediately before the induction of anesthesia. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used throughout the study. Complete response, defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue antiemetic medication during the first 24 h after anesthesia, was 49% in Group D1, 60% in Group D2 (P = 0.199 versus Group D1), 51% in Group M1, 62% in Group M2 (P = 0.198 versus Group M1), 80% in Group G1, and 96% in Group G2 (P = 0.025 versus Group G1). Our results suggest that dexamethasone enhances the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron but does not potentiate the other antiemetics-droperidol and metoclopramide-in female patients undergoing major gynecological surgery. Implications: We compared the efficacy of dexamethasone plus three different antiemetics-droperidol, metoclopramide, and granisetron-for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery. The granisetron-dexamethasone combination was the most effective for preventing post-operative emetic symptoms.     

Computer simulation of changes in nursing productivity from early tracheal extubation of coronary artery bypass graft patients

A total of 530 patients were treated in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study to compare the anti-emetic efficacy and safety of a once daily ondansetron oral regimen with a once daily i.v. dosing regimen over a 24 h period, administered to patients prior to receiving cisplatin (50 mg/m2 or greater) chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of ondansetron plus dexamethasone given either orally (ondansetron 24 mg and dexamethasone 12 mg, n=262) or i.v. (ondansetron 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg, n=268). Complete control of emesis (i.e. no emetic episodes, no rescue and no premature withdrawal) was achieved for 85% of patients (224 of 262) in the oral group and 83% (223 of 268) in the i.v. group. No nausea was reported in 70% of patients in the oral group and 68% in the i.v. group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any of the assessments of efficacy, which included time to first emetic episode, number of emetic episodes and the worst grade of nausea occurring over the 24 h study period. Once daily ondansetron oral and i.v., in combination with dexamethasone, was well tolerated in this study. In conclusion, once daily oral ondansetron 24 mg plus dexamethasone is equally effective in the control of emesis and nausea induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy as once daily ondansetron 8 mg i.v. plus dexamethasone.     

A guinea pig''s view on prostate cancer screening trials

Although the combination of paclitaxel with doxorubicin has yielded high response rates in metastatic breast cancer, severe cardiotoxic events have been reported in several patients. The rationale for our study was to evaluate the activity of paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination in patients with this disease but to avoid excessive cardiotoxicity. Therefore, we administered 4 cycles of doxorubicin/paclitaxel followed by 6 cycles of standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen. Study medication consisted of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 as a 15-min intravenous infusion followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion. CMF regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 as 1-hour intravenous infusion followed by methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 bolus injection. The main toxicity of doxorubicin/paclitaxel treatment phase was neutropenia (WHO grade 3/4, 58%), but we observed only one cardiac adverse event. Toxicities of the CMF treatment phase were not significant. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, 2 (8%) had complete responses and 11 (46%) achieved partial response. Ten additional patients (42%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 12 months and the median overall survival was 18.5 months. The sequential administration of doxorubicin and paclitaxel followed by CMF appeared active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Randomized, double blind, dose-response trial across four oral doses of dolasetron for the prevention of acute emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral Dolasetron Dose-Response Study Group

BACKGROUND: This double blind parallel group study assessed the acute antiemetic efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in cancer patients receiving their first course of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg of dolasetron mesylate 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy and were monitored for nausea and emetic episodes for the next 24 hours. RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen cancer patients at 32 sites completed the study. Most patients were female (81%); of this group, 69% had breast carcinoma. A highly statistically significant linear trend demonstrating improved response with higher doses was detected for complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), for complete plus major response (0-2 emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), and for patient visual analog scale assessments of nausea (P = 0.001) and general satisfaction with antiemetic therapy (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events were noted. The most frequent adverse event was mild, self-limiting headache, which has been reported with other drugs in this class. CONCLUSIONS: Single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate were found to be effective in preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.     

Reduction of cisplatin-induced emesis by a selective neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist. L-754,030 Antiemetic Trials Group

BACKGROUND: The localization of substance P in brain-stem regions associated with vomiting, and the results of studies in ferrets, led us to postulate that a neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist would be an antiemetic in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 159 patients who had not previously received cisplatin, we evaluated the prevention of acute emesis (occurring within 24 hours) and delayed emesis (on days 2 to 5) after a single dose of cisplatin therapy (70 mg or more per square meter of body-surface area). Before receiving cisplatin, all the patients received granisetron (10 microg per kilogram of body weight intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatments in addition to granisetron and dexamethasone: 400 mg of an oral trisubstituted morpholine acetal (also known as L-754,030) before cisplatin and 300 mg on days 2 to 5 (group 1), 400 mg of L-754,030 before cisplatin and placebo on days 2 to 5 (group 2), or placebo before cisplatin and placebo on days 2 to 5 (group 3). Additional medication was available at any time to treat occurrences of vomiting or nausea. RESULTS: In the acute-emesis phase, 93 percent of the patients in groups 1 and 2 combined and 67 percent of those in group 3 had no vomiting (P<0.001). In the delayed-emesis phase, 82 percent of the patients in group 1, 78 percent of those in group 2, and 33 percent of those in group 3 had no vomiting (P<0.001 for the comparison between group 1 or 2 and group 3). The median nausea score in the delayed-emesis phase was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 3 (P=0.003). No serious adverse events were attributed to L-754,030. CONCLUSIONS: The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist L-754,030 prevents delayed emesis after treatment with cisplatin. Moreover, combining L-754,030 with granisetron plus dexamethasone improves the prevention of acute emesis.     

Cisplatin and epirubicin plus oral lonidamine as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM)

Lonidamine (LND) is a unique antineoplastic drug derived from indazole-3-carboxylic acid which inhibits oxygen consumption and aerobic glycolysis, interfering with energy metabolism of neoplastic cells. LND has been experimentally shown to potentiate the cytotoxic effects of epirubicin (EPI) in human breast cancer cell lines, cisplatin activity in both platinum-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines, and EPI antineoplastic activity in some recent phase III trials carried out in advanced breast cancer. A multicenter phase II trial was carried out with the combination of cisplatin 60 mg/m2, EPI 100 mg/m2 and LND 450 mg/day p.o. in three refracted doses/day starting 2 days before cisplatin and EPI (day -2 and -1), stopping 2 days after chemotherapy (day 0, +1 and +2). Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled into the study. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for objective response. The overall response rate accordingly to an intent-to-treat analysis was 73% (95% CL 54-88%). Four patients achieved complete response (13%; 95% CL 4-31%) with a median duration of 9.5 months (range 4-16) and 18 patients had partial response (60%; 95% CL 41-77%) with a median duration of 9.8 months. Stable disease was obtained in five cases (17%) and progressive disease was recorded in three patients. One patient died of progressive cancer before restaging. The overall median survival of the whole series of patients was 14+ months. The most frequent toxicities were represented by gastrointestinal and hematological side effects. The combination of cisplatin + EPI plus oral LND is active against metastatic breast carcinoma. The antineoplastic activity of the cisplatin + EPI + LND regimen is as high as that reported for more aggressive regimens such as the fluorouracil + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide combinations without an increase in toxic effects.     

Distributed clinical neurophysiology

We have performed a clinical phase I trial of a combination treatment with paclitaxel given as 3-hour infusion and cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Doses administered ranged from 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel/75 mg/m2 cisplatin to 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. Twenty-four patients have been entered into this study. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 225-250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. The dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen was myelosuppression (granulocytopenia). Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity was moderate. However, analyses of threshold electrotonus studies indicated subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients. One patient receiving 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin developed grade 3 motor-neurotoxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 8 patients receiving doses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin or higher. Objective responses were observed at paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/ cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 5; complete response in 1 patient), paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 3; partial response in 3 patients) and at paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 8; partial response in 1 patient). Eleven additional patients had stable disease. We conclude that paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and neck cancer and that orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially significant clinical toxicity.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity profile of combined taxol (paclitaxel), ifosfamide, and platinum (cisplatin) (TIP) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion on day 1; ifosfamide 1,000 mg/m2 in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3; mesna 600 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3; and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. All were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not permitted. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assessable for response and toxicity; 53 for survival (local-regional recurrence alone in 57% and distant metastasis with or without local-regional recurrence in 43%). Overall response rate was 58% (30 of 52) of patients; complete response rate was 17% (nine of 52) of patients, with six complete responses that continued for a median 15.7+ months. Median follow-up of all patients was 17.7 months. Median survival was 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1 to 17.5 months). Toxicity was relatively well tolerated and caused no deaths. The most frequent moderate-to-severe toxicity (90% of patients) was transient grades 3 to 4 neutropenia; neutropenic fever occurred in 27%. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three patients, none had grade 4. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in only one patient, none had grade 4. CONCLUSION: TIP had major activity in this setting, with a 58% objective response rate, 17% complete response rate, durable complete responses (six of nine persisting), and relatively well-tolerated toxicity, with no toxic deaths. The activity of TIP, a novel taxol-cisplatin-based regimen, in recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC should be confirmed in a phase III trial.     

The influence of blood volume changes on leucocyte and lymphocyte subpopulations in elite swimmers following interval training of varying intensities

BACKGROUND: Current staging systems for unresectable or metastatic neuroblastoma do not reliably predict responses to chemotherapy in infants under 1 year of age. Previous studies have indicated that the DNA content, or ploidy, of malignant neuroblasts can discriminate between good and poor responders in this group of patients, but the clinical utility of ploidy assessment has remained in question. PURPOSE: We tested, in a prospective nonrandomized study, the hypothesis that neuroblast ploidy could be used as the sole guide for treatment selection in infants with unresectable or metastatic tumors and could differentiate between those who would respond to our previous standard regimen and those who would benefit from an immediate switch to another therapy. METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven infants were enrolled in this trial. Five of these infants were subsequently excluded (two ineligible, two lacking ploidy information, and one protocol violation); therefore, 172 patients were included in the study. One hundred thirty infants with hyperdiploid tumors (DNA index > 1.0; better prognosis in retrospective studies) were treated with a well-tolerated regimen of cyclophosphamide (150 mg/m2 per day orally or intravenously on days 1-7) and doxorubicin (35 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8). Forty-two infants with diploid tumors (DNA index = 1.0; worse prognosis in retrospective studies) received cisplatin (90 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) and teniposide (100 mg/ m2 intravenously on day 3) after an initial course of cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin. Statistical end points were response and long-term survival. In addition, we assessed within each ploidy group (i.e., patients with hyperdiploid tumors and those with diploid tumors) the prognostic significance of NMYC gene copy number, tumor stage, and other variables commonly measured in this disease. RESULTS: Of the 127 assessable infants with hyperdiploid tumors, 115 (91%) had complete responses--85 after receiving five courses of cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin and 30 after receiving further therapy including cisplatin plus teniposide. The 3-year survival estimate for the entire hyperdiploid group was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 89%-98%). Nineteen (46%) of 41 assessable infants with diploid tumors were complete responders. The overall 3-year survival estimate for this group was 55% (95% CI = 39%-70%). Prognostic factor analysis indicated that NMYC gene amplification and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level were statistically significant markers of higher risk disease within the diploid group (two-sided P values of .005 and .003, respectively). Only NMYC was predictive in the hyperdiploid group (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Use of a prognostic staging system based on tumor cell ploidy, augmented with the NMYC gene copy number and serum level of lactate dehydrogenase, would very likely improve the treatment of infants with unresectable or metastatic neuroblastoma. Patients with diploid tumors characterized by an amplified NMYC locus represent a particularly unfavorable risk group that may benefit from innovative new therapies.     

Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients

To determine if chemotherapy dose intensity influences treatment outcome in advanced ovarian cancer, all randomised studies of first line chemotherapy, published between 1975 and 1989, were analysed for relationships between planned dose intensity and (a) objective response and (b) median survival. Total dose intensity of each study regimen was calculated and a weighted regression model providing for systemic differences in response or survival among studies was utilised. Hence, treatment arms of different studies were never directly compared. In addition, relative dose intensities of individual drugs within combinations was similarly evaluated. The improvement in objective response rate when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 12% and 16% depending on baseline response rate. The improvement in median survival when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 2 and 4 months. One unit of total dose intensity corresponds to, for example, 20 mg m2 week of cisplatin, or 25 mg m2 week of doxorubicin, or 350 mg m2 week of cyclophosphamide. The analysis of individual drugs suggested that doxorubicin and the platinum compounds were about equally effective, with cyclophosphamide being less effective. The methodological benefits and limitations of the approach used and the implication of the results are discussed.     

Knowledge and attitudes among California dental care providers regarding child abuse and neglect

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus a platinum compound (carboplatin or cisplatin) is the current regimen of choice for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The two most widely used combinations are paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 24-hour infusion) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, 3-hour infusion) plus carboplating dosed to an area under curve of 7.5. Randomized trials are in progress comparing these two regimens. Numerous other clinical issues remain regarding how to maximize the effectiveness of this therapy, including dose and schedule, duration of treatment, route of administration, and incorporation of other agents with novel mechanisms of cytotoxicity. New agents currently undergoing evolution as part of novel induction regimens have been shown to have significant activity in recurrent ovarian cancer and include topotecan, gemcitabine, oral etoposide, and encapsulated doxorubicin.     

Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide

In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The patients received either i.v. ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. The number of patients with no nausea or vomiting in the ondansteron group was 50 (82%) compared with 29 (47%) in the metoclopramide group (P < 0.001). In those patients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondansetron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclude that preoperative prophylactic administration of i.v. ondansetron was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.     

Escalated dosages of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced urothelial carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE: This multicenter cooperative group phase I/II trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of escalated dosages of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1990 through October 1991, 35 patients with advanced urothelial cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy were treated with escalated dosages of M-VAC (M-VACII). In patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy, standard M-VAC (M-VACI) was administered plus rhG-CSF. For other patients, M-VACII dosages were methotrexate 40 mg/m2 (days 1, 15, and 22), vinblastine 4 mg/m2 (days 2, 15, and 22), doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 (day 2), and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 2). In addition, rhG-CSF was administered at a dosage of 300 micrograms subcutaneously on days 4 to 11. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. For patients who tolerated the first course of therapy, subsequent escalation by 25% of all drugs was performed. RESULTS: Six complete responses and 15 partial responses were observed (60%; 95% confidence interval, 42% to 76%). The median duration of response was 4.6 months, and the median survival time was 9.4 months (range, 0.5 to 23.5+). Twenty-eight of 35 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, including 14 patients who developed fever associated with neutropenia. Eight (23%) early deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: This regimen (M-VACII) with escalated dosages of M-VAC was associated with significant toxicity and had no apparent benefit over M-VACI therapy with regard to complete response rate or survival. Further evaluation of the dose-intensity of the components of this regimen in this disease is likely to be of limited benefit to patients.     

Clinical pharmacology of ondansetron

Ondansetron (ODS) is a new carbazole which exerts selective and potent antagonism on serotoninergic neurotransmission at serotonin 3 (5-HT3) receptors. Animal and clinical studies show that ODS reduces the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting induced by cytotoxic drugs and radiotherapy. The antiemetic properties of this agent have been determined in ferrets against the nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and whole-body radiation. The current hypothesis is that there may be both a peripheral and a central site of action for ODS. The lack of antagonist activity on dopamine and other non 5-HT3 receptors indicates that, unlike metoclopramide, ODS will not cause extrapyramidal or other dose-limiting side effects. ODS is rapidly and completely absorbed when administered as a tablet. Preliminary data show that ondansetron can be combined with dexamethasone safely with enhanced antiemetic results.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in advanced ovarian cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic support has been expected to improve the survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients in recent years. An essential component of such treatment has been the ability to collect and reinfuse a large number of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) following high dose therapy. This study was designed to determine which clinical and hematological factors would be better indicators to collect the proper volume of PBSCs. Thirteen patients received a total of 24 courses of induction chemotherapy and 69 of apheresis. We usually mobilized stem cells using CEP chemotherapy (cisplatin 50-70 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2) with G-CSF and CEE regimen (cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and etoposide 50 mg/m2) as a salvage for mobilization. We obtained an average 5 x 10(6)/kg of CD34+ cells for 3 days as one course. The number of CD34+ cells collected significantly depended on the platelets and reticulocytes on the first day of apheresis, but not a nadir of WBCs. It is concluded that apheresis should be started on recovery of WBCs to 5,000-10,000/microliters, of immature granulocytes to > or = 10% and of reticulocytes to > or = 20%. This study confirmed the feasibility of collecting enough PBSCs to use standard chemotherapy of ovarian cancer patients.