15-year follow-up of renin and blood pressure in reflux nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Beginning in 1978 a cohort of patients with reflux nephropathy first seen at a London Childrens hospital have had 5-yearly follow-ups. This is the fourth (15-year) report from that series. METHODS: Of the original 100 normotensive children with reflux nephropathy 78 were traced for the 15-year study in 1994. Five patients were excluded because of nephrectomy, ten for other reasons, and eight refused to take part, leaving 55. 26 were on oral contraceptives. Supine blood pressure and plasma renin activity (PRA) were measured, and daily sodium excretion was assessed on a sample of overnight urine. FINDINGS: Of the 55 patients (15 male, 40 female, median age 27 years, range 20-31), five had systolic and two had diastolic hypertension. Compared with the 10-year (1988) follow-up there was no change in blood pressure standard deviation scores (SDS) in this cohort. PRA showed an increasing dissociation from controls after 15 years of age and was significantly above that of controls by age 25. Exclusion of the patients on oral contraceptives did not significantly alter the results. The PRA values in 1988 were not individually predictive of the development of hypertension over the ensuing 5 years. INTERPRETATION: Previously, in the long-term study of reflux nephropathy, blood pressure SDS had progressively increased with age. By 15 years blood pressure had levelled out and the PRA, though raised, did not predict the development of hypertension. Oral contraceptive use did not significantly modify the results.     

Correlations between blood pressure, blood volume and plasma renin during therapy with diuretics in essential hypertension. Comparison between the mineralocorticoid antagonist spironolactone and the "loop" diuretic mefruside

35 patients with benign essential hypertension were treated for 6 weeks with high doses of the mineralocorticoid-antagonist spironolactone (400 mg/day), or with the "loop-diuretic" mefruside (mean maximal dose 110 mg/day). Spironolactone caused greater reductions in blood pressure and blood volume and a more marked increase in plasma renin activity (PRA) than mefruside (p less than 0.05). It appears possible that he weaker antihypertensive effect of mefruside may relate partly to its lesser influence on circulatory volume. With both diuretics, mean decreases in blood pressure were greater in patients with low pre-therapeutic PRA than in patients with normal or high PRA. However, the diuretic-induced changes in blood pressure did not correlate with the associated variations in blood volume or PRA. Thus, the increased blood pressure sensitivity to diuretics in patients with low-renin essential hypertension did not appear to be volume or renin-dependent. Under normal conditions, the maintenance of a constant blood pressure during volume depletion may partly depend on compensatory activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Moreover, patients with low-renin essential hypertension have been found to have decreased adrenergic activity. It seems possible, therefore, that the marked blood pressure sensitivity to diuretic treatment in such patients may be the result of an impaired compensatory sympathetic response to sodium and volume depletion. Analysis of the literature suggests that the diuretic furosemide, a structural relative of mefruside, may also have less blood pressure lowering efficacy in patients with essential hypertension than the distally-acting thiazides, chlorthalidone or spironolactone. Consideration of possible differences in the blood pressure reducing potential of certain diuretics thus appears to be necessary in planning the pharmacotherapy of essential hypertension.     

A randomized comparison of a conventional dose, a low dose and alternate-day dosing of bendrofluazide in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2.5 mg bendrofluazide daily (the standard antihypertensive dose), 1.25 mg bendrofluazide daily and 2.5 mg bendrofluazide on alternate days, in terms of reduction of blood pressure, patient compliance and adverse effect profile. DESIGN: A single-blind parallel group trial of patients who were randomly assigned to 16 weeks' treatment with bendrofluazide at doses of 2.5 mg daily, 1.25 mg daily and 2.5 mg every other day after a 4-week placebo run-in period. SETTING: General practices in the greater Belfast and Lisburn area in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients with newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed hypertension, who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 90-110 mmHg after receiving placebo for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in blood pressure, patient compliance and changes in biochemical variables. RESULTS: Sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures in members of all three groups were significantly lowered with respect to baseline (P < 0.01) with no differences among groups. Overall mean compliance was 97%. No clear relation between dose and biochemical changes was apparent. CONCLUSIONS: Bendrofluazide at doses of 1.25 mg daily or 2.5 mg every other day reduces blood pressure as effectively as does the conventional 2.5 mg daily regimen.     

Accidental intake of tritiated water: a cytogenetic follow-up case on translocation stability and dose reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the renin-aldosterone system and insulin secretion in hyperparathyroidism and their effects on blood pressure regulation. DESIGN: Studies were carried out on patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) prior to and following removal of the parathyroid tumor. METHODS: Sixteen normotensive and euglycemic patients with PHPT were studied. The following parameters were measured: basal and stimulated plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone (ALD) secretion: parathormone (PTH) and serum electrolytes. Insulin and glucose levels were measured during an oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Systolic but not diastolic blood pressure showed a decrease following surgery, from 123.3+/-13.0/80+/-8.6 to 116.7+/-13.5/77.3+/-8.8 mmHg. The decrease in the systolic pressure was not clinically significant. After surgery, both the basal and stimulated PRA and ALD values decreased, and the preoperative pathological values returned to normal: PRA basal: 1.79 --> 0.70 ng/ml/h, P=0.0049; PRA stimulated: 7.76 --> 1.90 ng/ml/h, P=0.0031; ALD basal: 111.5 --> 73.0 pg/ml, P=0.0258; ALD stimulated: 392.5 --> 236.0 pg/ml, P=0.0157. The postoperative decrease in the PRA correlated with the changes in PTH levels (r=0.5442, P < 0.05, n=16) but did not correlate with the changes in serum calcium concentrations. Both the fasting and stimulated insulin levels decreased after surgery but remained within the normal range: insulin fasting: 10.2 --> 5.0 mIU/l, P=0.0218; insulin area under the curve: 5555 --> 3296 mIU/l*min, P=0.0218. There was no correlation between the changes in insulin levels and PTH or ion levels. Sodium, potassium and blood glucose levels remained unaffected by parathyroid surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of normotensive hyperparathyroid patients an increased activity of the renin-aldosterone system related to PTH was found and surgery resulted in a small and insignificant decrease in blood pressure. This change was accompanied by a significant decrease in the activity of the renin-aldosterone system indicating the role of the renin-aldosterone system in the regulation of blood pressure in PHPT. Both fasting and stimulated insulin values decreased following removal of the parathyroid tumor, but with no individual correlation with PTH and calcium levels.     

Autoamputation of the fingertips in an 11-year-old boy

This study examined the relationship of plasma renin activity (PRA) to the likelihood of maintaining blood pressure control after discontinuation of antihypertensive medication. Patients whose blood pressure was previously treated and controlled in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program were enrolled in the Dietary Intervention Study of Hypertension. After stratification by obesity, patients were randomized to discontinue medication with no dietary intervention, sodium restriction, or weight reduction for the obese. Among 496 subjects in the Dietary Intervention Study of Hypertension, 75 were randomly selected for PRA measurement at 4 months after intervention, and all had their blood pressure under control at that time. Patients were followed up for 56 weeks after randomization. The endpoint was return to antihypertensive medication due to elevated diastolic blood pressure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that subjects with PRA < or = 53.3 ng/100 mL/h, the median level, had a lower cumulative success rate for remaining off antihypertensive drug than those with PRA above the median (P = .046). In Cox regression analysis controlling for 24-h urinary sodium level, baseline diastolic blood pressure, age, sex, race, obesity, and dietary intervention group, a unit decrease in log PRA was associated with a 2.78-fold increase in risk of returning to drug (P = .006); this inverse relationship was independent of dietary intervention and change in diastolic blood pressure in the first 4 months before PRA was measured. The data indicate that patients with low PRA are less likely to maintain blood pressure control without drugs than patients with high PRA.     

Trimethoprim resistance and susceptibility genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the acute effects of the new angiotensin II antagonist, candesartan cilexetil, on systemic and renal haemodynamics in patients with sustained essential hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-114 mmHg]. METHODS: After 4 weeks of placebo treatment, systemic and renal haemodynamics were investigated in 17 patients with a mean age of 62 years and a mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 170/98 mmHg, just before (baseline) and for 4 h after administration of a single oral dose of candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg. Plasma concentrations of candesartan (the active compound formed from the pro-drug candesartan cilexetil), angiotensin II (Ang II), as well as plasma renin activity (PRA), were measured before and after dosing. RESULTS: At 2, 3 h and 4 h after dosing with candesartan cilexetil, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP, as well as mean arterial pressure (MAP), were significantly lower than at baseline. The mean reduction in MAP 4 h after dosing was 8.8 mmHg (-6.5%). This effect was due to a fall in total peripheral resistance (TPR), while heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were virtually unchanged. After 4 h there was a marked reduction in renal vascular resistance (RVR) of 0.0273 mmHg x ml(-1) x min (-16%), resulting in an increased renal plasma flow of 64.9 ml x min(-1) (14%). The glomerular filtration rate was increased by 7.75 ml x min(-1) (8%), and the filtration fraction (FF) was not significantly changed. There was no apparent relationship between the changes observed in systemic and renal haemodynamic variables and plasma concentrations of candesartan. Plasma renin activity increased over the study period, but in general the patients had low PRA. Changes in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II were inconsistent between patients. CONCLUSION: A single oral tablet of candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg, induced systemic and renal arterial vasodilatation and blood pressure reduction, without compromising renal perfusion or filtration or affecting cardiac performance. Plasma renin activity which was low in general, increased over the study period, but changes in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II were inconsistent.     

Molecular analysis of the histone gene cluster of Psammechinus miliaris: III. Polarity and asymmetry of the histone-coding sequences

The Ca2+ antagonistic coronary vasodilator, Nifedipine, was sublingually administered by a dose of 30 mg to 19 patients with hypertension. Blood pressure of patients with with essential hypertension (n=14) decreased from 177 +/- 24 to 123 +/- 13 mmHg systolic and from 108 +/- 12 to 80 +/- 11 mmHg diastolic (mean +/- SD) (p less than 0.01). Plasma renin activity (PRA) increased significantly from 0.73 +/- 0.62 to 1.50 +/- 1.02 ng/ml/h (p less than 0.05). The same tendency was observed in malignant and renovascular hypertension. In primary aldosteronism (n = 2), blood pressure decreased but PRA did not increase. Hypotensive action and increased plasma renin activity by Ca2+ antagonist, Nifedipine, were clearly demonstrated in patients with hypertension.     

Influence of benazepril and captopril on blood pressure, glucocorticoids and progesterone in essential hypertensives

The antihypertensive activity and the influence of adrenal cortex hormones of benazepril versus captopril were studied in 30 essential hypertensives in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial during eight weeks of treatment. Patients started with 50 mg of captopril or 10 mg of benazepril once daily; if normotension had not been obtained after four weeks of treatment the doses were increased to 50 mg twice daily or 20 mg once daily, respectively. 11-Oxycorticosteroids and progesterone in males were measured in blood and daily urine at baseline and at the 4th and the 15th days of drug administration, as well as aldosterone in daily urine by radioimmunoassay, and compared with these data in 15 healthy subjects. Following eight weeks of treatment in 64% and 56% of patients treated with benazepril and captopril respectively, blood pressure was normalised. In the corresponding remaining 14% and 13%, diastolic blood pressure decreased by 10 mmHg and more but not below 90 mmHg. Before treatment excretion of 11-oxycorticosteroids, progesterone and aldosterone was significantly increased without changes in blood levels. After two weeks of treatment 11-oxycorticosteroids and aldosterone excretion decreased (P < 0.05) without progesterone changes, benazepril treatment being more effective in decreasing 11-oxycorticosteroids levels in blood (P < 0.05). In patients with high pretreatment levels of 11-oxycorticosteroids in urine we have noticed the highest antihypertensive effect of both drugs. The main conclusions are that both the ACE inhibitors are effective in mild to moderate essential hypertensives and might decrease glucocorticoids in urine and blood.     

Prognostic evaluation of early indicators in fulminant hepatic failure by multivariate analysis

Results of eight multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group studies were pooled to assess the efficacy of the angiotensin II-receptor blocker irbesartan over the dose range of 1 to 900 mg. A total of 2955 adults with a seated diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 110 mm Hg were randomized to treatment with oral irbesartan once daily or placebo for 6 to 8 weeks. Office blood pressure was measured at trough (24+/-3 hours after the last dose) and peak (3+/-1 hours after the last dose) by mercury sphygmomanometry. Demographic characteristics (mean blood pressure; 151/101 mm Hg; mean age, 54 years; 63% male; and 82% white) were similar across all dose groups. After the groups were pooled, antihypertensive efficacy was assessed by therapeutic response (trough seated diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a reduction from baseline of > or = 10 mm Hg) and by modeling of the maximum reductions in trough and peak seated diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Antihypertensive effects increased with increasing doses and reached a plateau at > or = 300 mg. Irbesartan 150 mg provided placebo-subtracted reductions in trough seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure of approximately 8 and approximately 5 mm Hg, respectively, with 56% of patients displaying a favorable response. In conclusion, irbesartan provides clinically significant blood pressure lowering, with a clear relationship between (log) dose and antihypertensive effect.     

Renin, aldosterone and arterial pressure responses to acute beta-adrenergic receptor blockage in hypertensive patients

The effect of acute (intravenous) beta-adrenergic blockade with propranolol or pindolol on arterial pressure (BP), plasma renin activity (PRA), and plasma concentration of aldosterone (PA) was evaluated in 20 essential hypertensive men. BP, PRA and PA were determined during continuous recumbency over-night (8 p.m. to 6 a.m.) every 30 min. Two groups of patients were observed. Patients of group 1 exhibited a characteristic day-night rhythm of PRA with low values before midnight and large increases early in the morning. Conversely, no rhythm and very low PRA values were observed in patients of group II. BP was higher in group II than in group I. In group I following intravenous propranolol or pindolol, BP fell within minutes and levels as well as rhythms of PRA were converted to those of group II without treatment. In group II day-night profiles of PRA and BP remained unchanged. Rhythm and concentration of PA in the two groups were not influenced by either drug. In 4 patients of group I infusion of angiotensin II inhibitor did not lower BP. The observations suggest that in the two groups dissimilarities in rhythms of PRA as well as in BP responses to beta-blockade may reflect differences in neuro-adrenergic tone.     

Ambulatory--not office--blood pressures decline during hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal women

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT, estrogen plus progestagen) in postmenopausal women has beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. However, effects on blood pressure, determined with office measurements, remain controversial. We studied the effects of HRT in 29 healthy normotensive postmenopausal women (mean age 52.3 [3.8] years, median duration of amenorrhea 34.5 months), using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Women were randomized to two groups: an HRT group (N = 14), treated with 1 mg 17beta-estradiol once daily and 5 or 10 mg dydrogesterone once daily during the third and fourth week of every 4 weeks; and a control group (C-group, N = 15), which did not receive therapy. Blood pressures did not differ between the groups at baseline (HRT group 117.1 (9.2)/74.4 (6.6) mm Hg, C-group 113.8 (11.2)/71.3 (7.4) mm Hg). During the follow-up period, changes from baseline of office blood pressures did not differ significantly between the groups. However, changes (95% CI) of mean 24-h blood pressures differed significantly between the two groups after 1 year of follow-up: a decrease of blood pressures was observed in the HRT group (delta systolic/delta diastolic = -5.54 [-8.86 to -2.21]/-4.23 [-6.66 to -1.80] mm Hg), whereas an increase was found in the C-group (+3.33 [-0.69 to +7.35]/+1.67 [-1.75 to +5.09] mm Hg; P [HRT v control group] = .001/.005). We conclude that HRT may have blood pressure lowering properties in healthy, normotensive postmenopausal women.     

Changes in arterial-veinous coronary difference of substrates from the carbohydrate-energetic and fatty metabolism during experimental hypertensive reaction caused by sympathomimetic preparation VMI 20-4

Plasma renin concentration (PRC) was measured in 46 patients with essential hypertension before and after treatment for 4 weeks with alprenolol 600-1200 mg daily. In 27 of these patients PRC was measured after 4 weeks of combined treatment with alprenolol and hydralizine. During alprenolol treatment PRC and blood pressure were reduced, but the changes were not correlated. Alprenolol treatment caused similar blood pressure reductions in patients with high and low PRC, and the antihypertensive efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents could not be predicted from the pretreatment PRC. When beta-adrenergic blockade was supplemented with hydralazine, blood pressure was further reduced, but PRC remained unchanged. Although a causal relationship between blood pressure reduction and suppression of renin, production might exist at low doses of beta-adrenergic blocking agents, the present study did not indicate such a relationship when higher doses were used. It was shown that alprenolol inhibited the increase in PRC usually induced by hydralazine, but it is not known whether this was important for the effectiveness of the fall in blood pressure produced by hydralazine.     

Left ventricular repercussion of obesity-induced arterial hypertension in the dog

Obesity and hypertension are frequently associated. The aim of our study was to assess the effects of high fat diet on weight, blood pressure and left ventricule in dogs. We studied 6 male Beagle dogs before and after 7 weeks of hypercaloric hyperlipidic diet. Echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular wall thickness, volumes, ejection fraction and mass. Results are expressed as % of variation of initial values. After 20 weeks, dogs presented abdominal obesity with increased body weight (11.9 +/- 2.3 to 15.2 +/- 2 kg; p < 0.03) associated with an increasing of systolic (196.5 +/- 14.6 to 260.1 +/- 17.5 mmHg; p < 0.03), diastolic (76.6 +/- 9 to 110.6 +/- 10.2; p < 0.004) and mean blood pressure (128.8 +/- 7 to 152.7 +/- 7.6 mmHg; p < 0.004). There were non significant changes concerning diastolic thickness of septum and posterior wall. Left ventricular volumes increased in diastole (41.1 +/- 4.5 to 48.9 +/- 10.3 cm3; p < 0.03) and systole (12.2 +/- 1.7 to 14.9 +/- 3.2 cm3; p < 0.03). So, despite any changes in wall thickness, we observed an increased of ventricular mass (67 +/- 15 to 80 +/- 24.3 g; p < 0.03). Ejection fraction remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: it appears that hight fat diet induces obesity and hypertension in dogs; changes in left ventricule suggest a volodependent hypertension.     

Effect of indomethacin on blood pressure control during treatment with nitrendipine

This study tested the hypothesis that treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug will not alter the hypotensive effect of a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist. Fifteen essential hypertensives (ages 58-80 years) had a supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 100 mmHg after 4 weeks monotherapy with nitrendipine 5-20 mg twice daily. They entered a double-blind randomised crossover study in which the addition of indomethacin 25 mg three times daily was compared with placebo in treatment phases each of 4 weeks duration. Subjects were seen weekly and measurements in the last 2 weeks of each phase were compared. Supine blood pressure (mean +/- SE) was higher in the indomethacin phase (158 +/- 4/80 +/- 2) than in the placebo phase (154 +/- 4/76 +/- 3) (p < 0.01 for DBP). In 6/15 (40%) of subjects the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure with indomethacin was > 5 mmHg. Plasma urea was also increased in the indomethacin phase: 7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l compared with placebo: 6.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (p < 0.001). The study has demonstrated that concurrent treatment with the NSAID indomethacin impairs the blood pressure lowering effect of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist nitrendipine. This increase in blood pressure with indomethacin in subjects treated with nitrendipine may represent either an independent pressor effect of indomethacin or a reduced vasodilator prostanoid contribution to the hypotensive effect of nitrendipine. This blood pressure increase may be sufficient to interfere significantly with clinical blood pressure control in some subjects.     

Antihypertensive activity and pharmacokinetics of KD3-671, a nonpeptide AT1-receptor antagonist, in renal hypertensive dogs

The antihypertensive activity and pharmacokinetics of KD3-671 (previously named KT3-671), a nonpeptide AT1-receptor antagonist, were investigated in renal hypertensive dogs with normal or high plasma renin activity (PRA). A single administration of KD3-671 at 3 and 10 mg/kg, p.o., to the hypertensive dogs with high PRA dose-dependently reduced mean blood pressure (MBP), which was not correlated with plasma KD3-671 concentration. Significant increases in PRA and plasma angiotensin (Ang) II occurred 2 h after KD3-671 dosing. Enalapril at 3 mg/kg, p.o., also reduced MBP. Neither KD3-671 nor enalapril affected heart rate. When given orally once a day for 29 days to the hypertensive dogs with normal PRA, KD3-671 at 3 and 10 mg/kg/day dose-dependently reduced MBP, which was smaller than that in the dogs with high PRA. This was the case for enalapril. The hypotension induced by the first dose of KD3-671 or enalapril was consistently observed after doses 8, 15, 22, and 29. After cessation of repeated dosing, no rebound phenomenon in MBP was observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters of KD3-671 were not influenced by repeated dosing. KD3-671 markedly increased both PRA and plasma Ang II concentration at 2 h after dosing. These results suggest that KD3-671 may be useful for the treatment of hypertension.     

Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the blood pressure lowering efficacy as well as tolerability and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan compared with that of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel study. Patients (n = 407) with diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 120 mmHg at the end of a 2-week baseline placebo period were randomly allocated to receive either 50 mg losartan once a day or 20 mg enalapril once a day for 12 weeks. Blood pressure, clinical and laboratory safety, specific symptoms including coughing determined using a symptoms questionnaire and metabolic variables were examined at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12. RESULTS: Both losartan and enalapril decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline at weeks 6 and 12. Blood pressure changes from baseline at trough (22-26 h after the dose) did not differ between the two groups in the per-protocol analysis. Response to treatment at trough was excellent or good (diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg) in 51 and 53% of the patients in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. Enalapril administration increased dry coughing symptoms whereas losartan did not. The incidence of dry coughing was 1.0 and 12.2% as a spontaneously reported discomfort at week 12 and 3.0 and 15.1% as a clinical adverse experience in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. The difference from baseline at week 12 in the incidence of dry coughing between the two groups was 14.9% as a specific symptom in the symptoms questionnaire. Losartan reduced serum uric acid concentration, whereas effects on other metabolic parameters did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug showing similar blood-pressure-lowering efficacy to that of enalapril at trough. However, in contrast to enalapril, losartan does not increase the incidence of dry coughing. Thus, the angiotensin II antagonist losartan provides a promising new approach to treatment of hypertension.     

Minoxidil in severe and moderately severe hypertension, in association with methyldopa and chlortalidone

Minoxidil is a potent antihypertensive drug widely used in severe arterial hypertension and in that refractory to treatment. Its effectiveness in less severe forms of hypertension was evaluated in 15 patients who had either a severe to moderate arterial hypertension not previously treated, or who did not tolerate the side effects of other antihypertensive drugs. The usefulness of methyldopa and chlortalidone to prevent a potential minoxidil-induced tachycardia and fluid retention, respectively, was also tested. The patients were initially treated with chlortalidone 100 mg/day, and methyldopa 500 mg/day. Minoxidil was then given in increasing doses until the diastolic blood pressure was equal to or inferior to 90 mmHg. This occurred consistently at doses which ranged from 5 to 50 mg/day (average, 29 mg). Treatment with minoxidil was continued for four months; tolerance to the drugs was not observed. Low doses of methyldopa and chlortalidone were effective in controlling the tachycardia and the retention of sodium and water induced by minoxidil. The three associated drugs were well tolerated and the life quality improved in most patients. Hypertrichosis was the most consistent side effect. Two patients were withdrawn from the study after the blood pressure was controlled by minoxidil, because of the appearance of angor in one, and edema and heart failure in the other.     

Efficacy and safety of enalapril versus extended-release nifedipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter 22-week study. Multicenter Cooperative Study Group

The antihypertensive effects and tolerability of single daily doses of enalapril and extended-release nifedipine (nifedipine-ER) were compared in an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 22-week treatment study involving 230 men and women (mean age, 55 years). Following a 3-week washout period, mean +/- SD blood pressure levels were 153 +/- 17/99 +/- 4 mmHg in the enalapril group (n = 117) and 157 +/- 17/100 +/- 5 mmHg in the nifedipine-ER group (n = 113). Beginning at 5 mg once daily for enalapril and 30 mg once daily for nifedipine-ER, the dosage was titrated every 4 weeks for 16 weeks, up to a maximum of 40 mg for enalapril and 120 mg for nifedipine-ER. The treatment goal (satisfactory response) was to lower trough sitting diastolic blood pressure to < 90 mmHg or by at least 10 mmHg to a level of < 100 mmHg. At a mean daily dose of 16 mg of enalapril and 57 mg of nifedipine-ER, more than three quarters of each treatment group achieved a satisfactory response. The mean reductions in trough sitting blood pressure levels at the end of 22 weeks of treatment were 15/11 mmHg for enalapril and 21/13 mmHg for nifedipine-ER. The difference between treatments was significant only for the change in systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). However, enalapril was better tolerated than nifedipine-ER. The numbers of patients with adverse experiences and withdrawals from the study because of an adverse experience were significantly lower for enalapril than for nifedipine-ER (P < 0.05). The incidence of abnormal laboratory findings was small and considered of no clinical importance in either group. These data suggest that enalapril and nifedipine-ER had approximately equal efficacy as once-daily antihypertensive treatments, but enalapril was better tolerated.     

Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare the acute and chronic effects of nifedipine retard (NPA), nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (NGITS) and amlodipine at trough and peak plasma concentrations of drug on blood pressure and heart rate, and on plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95-115 mmHg). DESIGN AND METHODS: After 3-4 weeks' placebo treatment, patients of both sexes were randomly allocated to be administered 10 or 20 mg NPA twice a day, 30 or 60 mg NGITS once a day, and 5 or 10 mg amlodipine once a day for 6 weeks. Initially, for the first 2 weeks, the lowest dose of each drug was used, but higher doses were administered after 2 weeks if sitting diastolic blood pressure was > 90 mmHg. Patients were evaluated after administration of the first dose and after 6 weeks' therapy in a hospital setting. Blood samples were taken for high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of catecholamine and drug levels at various intervals for a period covering trough to peak drug level ranges. RESULTS: Administration of all three drugs reduced clinic blood pressure to the same level after 6 weeks' therapy, but heart rate was increased slightly only with amlodipine (P < 0.05). Administration of NPA reduced blood pressure more abruptly whereas administrations of NGITS and amlodipine induced smoother falls after acute and chronic treatments: a significant increase in heart rate was observed with amlodipine after chronic treatment. Both acute and chronic treatments with NPA (n = 19) increased norepinephrine levels (P < 0.01) transiently (2-4 h). In contrast, administration of NGITS (n = 22) did not increase norepinephrine levels and even induced a slight but significant decrease in norepinephrine levels 5-6 h after chronic treatments. Although administration of amlodipine (n = 22) did not increase norepinephrine levels transiently either after acute or after chronic administration, it did induce a sustained rise in basal norepinephrine levels by more than 50% after chronic therapy (P < 0.01). Plasma epinephrine levels were not increased by any of the treatments and even a slight decrease was observed 4 h after administration of a dose following chronic treatments with NGITS and amlodipine (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The transient increase in norepinephrine levels observed with NPA and the sustained increases in norepinephrine levels observed after chronic treatment with amlodipine suggest that sympathetic activation occurs with those two drugs. The lack of increase in norepinephrine levels after administration of NGITS suggests that this formulation does not activate the sympathetic system. The lowering of epinephrine levels after administrations of NGITS and amlodipine suggests that inhibition of release of epinephrine by the adrenal medulla occurs with longer-acting dihydropyridine formulations.     

Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours

This study was done to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 320 mg over 24 hours using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A total of 217 adult outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (office mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] of > or = 95 to < or = 115 mm Hg) participated in this multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was done at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All valsartan doses produced significant decreases in average ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP over 24 hours compared with placebo. A trend to greater reductions compared with placebo was observed for doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater (80 mg, -6.61 mm Hg DBP, -11.04 mm Hg SBP; 160 mg, -5.51 mm Hg DBP, -10.61 mm Hg SBP; 320 mg, -8.44 mm Hg DBP, -14.34 mm Hg SBP) compared with valsartan 20 mg (-3.52 mm Hg DBP, -5.92 mm Hg SBP). Valsartan produced consistent reductions compared with placebo during both day (> 6 AM to < or = 10 PM) and night (> 10 PM to < or = 6 AM). However, in all groups, the circadian pattern of blood pressure over 24 hours was preserved and was similar to that observed at baseline (but shifted into the normotensive range in a parallel fashion). The data show that single daily doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater provide effective control of both DBP and SBP over a 24-hour period without loss of diurnal variation.