共查询到16条相似文献,搜索用时 484 毫秒
1.
主机标识协议(Host Identity Protocol,HIP)是一种综合解决主机移动、多宿主及安全问题的有效方案,为了解决现有HIP机制在处理主机移动时存在切换延迟大、丢包率高等问题,提出了一种高效的基于HIP的移动性管理机制。该机制在基于HIP的层次化设计模型基础上,采用FMIPv6中的快速切换思想,引入了链路层触发机制、预先绑定更新机制和分组缓存转发机制。有效解决了移动主机在不同区域范围内的切换问题,降低了切换延迟和丢包率,改善了移动主机的切换性能,实现了透明、平滑、快速的网络切换。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
HIP——主机标志协议的技术研究 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
分析了TCP/IP协议在解决主机的移动、多宿主、动态IP地址变化、网络安全、NAT/NAPT等问题上的缺陷,介绍了一个综合解决这些问题的方案——HIP及其实现框架,深入介绍了协议的实现细节,分析了该协议如何解决了上述一系列问题,最后总结了HIP的意义和存在的问题。 相似文献
6.
7.
提出一种基于HIP协议的间接通信结构模型HBIA,该模型引入了"映射同步更新"机制,将用户的身份信息与位置信息相分离,用接入标识HIT表示终端主机的身份,而广义交换路由标识IP仅用于终端主机在核心网中路由和寻址.主机移动时,由于仅仅改变了其广义交换路由标识,而接入标识并没有发生变化,因此只要及时完成其主、从、子映射的同步更新,原有通信就不会中断,从而有效解决了终端的移动问题.在搭建的环境中进行了实验和验证,测试结果表明,该更新机制能够很好地实现主机的移动并保障了其安全性. 相似文献
8.
NAT穿越技术是基于分组的多媒体传输技术中一个重要的研究课题.目前已有不少切实可行的解决方案,但它们都具有一定的局限性.主机标识协议(host identity protocol,HIP)在传输层与网络层之间引入了新的协议层,打破了身份标识与拓扑位置的绑定,通过引入HIP,提出一种基于HIP的NAT穿越方案.讨论了网络体系中各层的具体穿越办法,并对新方案进行了安全性分析. 相似文献
9.
《计算机学报》2014,(2)
当前互联网中的IP地址同时标识主机身份和主机位置,这种语义重载主要导致了两方面的问题.一方面,它使得核心网络路由表项数量急剧增长,引起路由可扩展性问题.另一方面,主机难以在不改变身份标识的情况下实现多宿主和移动中的高速切换.解决这两个问题的根本办法是主机的身份和位置分离,即分别使用相互独立的身份标识和位置标识.目前身份/位置分离方案得到了研究人员的广泛关注,然而现有的方案只是针对某一个问题,不能同时解决这两个问题.此外身份位置分离之后的真实身份问题也很重要.文中提出了一种新型身份/位置分离方案SAMS(Scalable Authentic Mobile identifier-locator Separation scheme),它将用户身份标识、主机身份标识、边缘网络位置标识和核心网络位置标识分离,并设计合理的体系结构将这4种标识结合在一起,对路由可扩展性,主机多宿主和移动能力都有很大的提高,并支持真实身份.文中实现了SAMS的原型系统,并在CERNET2主干网上进行了规模部署和实验,验证了方案的有效性和系统的兼容性. 相似文献
10.
11.
Imen El Bouabidi Faouzi Zarai Mohammad S. Obaidat Lotfi Kamoun 《The Journal of supercomputing》2014,70(3):1036-1050
Mobility protocols allow hosts to change their location or network interface while maintaining ongoing sessions. While such protocols can facilitate vertical mobility in a cost-efficient and access agnostic manner, they are not sufficient to address all security issues when used in scenarios requiring local mobility management. In this paper, we propose a new scheme that makes Host Identity Protocol (HIP) able to serve as an efficient and secure mobility protocol for wireless heterogeneous networks while preserving all the advantages of the base HIP functions as well. Our proposal, called Heterogeneous Mobility HIP (HMHIP), is based on hierarchical topology of rendezvous Servers (RVSs), signaling delegation, and inter-RVS communication to enable secure and efficient network mobility support in the HIP layer. Formal security analysis using the AVISPA tool and performance evaluation of this method are provided; they confirm the safety and efficiency of the proposed solution. HMHIP reduces handover latency and packet overhead during handovers by achieving registration locally. 相似文献
12.
将宏观移动性管理的主机标识协议(HIP)应用于分布式移动性管理(DMM)构架,并将聚合服务器(RVS)与DMM中的移动性接入路由MAR功能集成于分布式接入网关(D-GW)。采用扩展HIP协议数据包头的参数,在注册D-GW的HIP BEX消息中携带切换前D-GW的主机标识符的二元组(HIT,IP地址),新D-GW根据此二元组信息向前一个D-GW注册并建立的隧道,将缓存在前D-GW中的数据转给新D-GW。这一切换机制可有效地保证数据完整性,仿真结果表明该方法能有效减少总的信令开销,同时基于HIP的移动性管理使节点的安全性得到了保证。 相似文献
13.
通过对HIP(Host Identity Protocol)协议和HIP组播模型的深入研究,提出一种新的HIP组播路由机制。新机制不改变HIP组播模型中对组播树的创建和维护方式,引入组地址变量进行路由转发,降低了原模型中路由处理的复杂度。使用Linux平台模拟HIP组播路由器并实现相关协议。理论分析和实验表明,新机制提高了HIP组播数据的传输和转发效率,降低了HIP安全组播模型中组播路由器的部署难度。 相似文献
14.
With increasing societal dependence on the Internet and new application areas emerging, the need for securing communications and identifying communication partners is expected to increase. However, the original Internet architecture is lacking these functionalities, and most of the protocols proposed to fix these issues have not been widely deployed. Often one of the reasons for such failure is that protocol designers have insufficient understanding of the potential adopters’ economic incentives so one may end up designing protocols based on false or inaccurate assumptions. In this paper, we analyze the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) from this viewpoint. Based on 19 expert interviews, we identify six main reasons why HIP has not been widely deployed yet. Most importantly, (1) the demand for the functionalities of HIP has been low. Where demand would have existed, substitute solutions have been favored because (2) they were earlier on the market, (3) they have relative advantage due to some design choices of HIP, (4) HIP lacks early adopter benefits necessitating costly coordination among multiple stakeholders in public deployment scenarios, and (5) people have misconceptions about the deployability of HIP. Additionally, (6) the research-mindedness of HIP developers has lead to strategic mistakes and non-optimal design choices from the perspective of deployment. We also suggest strategies that HIP developers could take to foster the adoption of HIP. Besides providing value to HIP developers, the results propose some new adoption barriers and deployment strategies that could be taken into account when designing new protocols. Finally, the article also provides a template that could be followed when studying the feasibility of other protocols. 相似文献
15.