Intensified adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy: a dose-finding study for ambulatory patients with breast cancer

Escalating doses of cyclophosphamide were given every 3 weeks as adjuvant treatment for women operated for breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given with constant doses of methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2; CMF) as an outpatient treatment without the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF). The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 250 mg/m2 starting from the dose of 1,000 mg/m2. Mesna was given to prevent cystitis. The criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were grade IV granulocytopenia lasting for longer than 48 h, granulocytopenic infection or other grade IV toxicities. G-CSF and ofloxacin were used if grade IV granulocytopenia continued for longer than 48 h or if granulocytopenic infection occurred. At the dose level of 1,500 mg/m2 (500 mg/m2/week) 22 (92%) of the 24 patients had grade IV granulocytopenia during the 6 CMF cycles given, but only 3 (13%) had granulocytopenic fever. G-CSF was used in 28% of the cycles at this dose level. Other toxicities included complete alopecia (79%), nausea and vomiting. Sixteen (80%) of the premenopausal women became postmenopausal. At the dose level of 1,750 mg/m2 all 3 patients treated had to be hospitalized after the first cycle due to neutropenic infection (n = 2) or intractable vomiting even though prophylactic G-CSF was used. We conclude that intravenous CMF with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1,500 mg/m2 given at 3-week intervals with the selective use of prophylactic G-CSF is feasible as adjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer.     

Pulmonary toxicity after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Sporadic cases have developed pulmonary toxicity after receiving chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, because such cases received chemotherapy that alone frequently causes pulmonary toxicity, the role of G-CSF in this toxicity has been unclear. CHOP therapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) only slightly induces pulmonary toxicity. However, we observed a considerable incidence of this toxicity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subjects receiving CHOP therapy and G-CSF (6 out of 52 subjects, 11.5%). In this cohort, among various characteristics, including the dose and interval of CHOP therapy, only the mean peak leucocyte count (MPLC) with each therapy cycle was associated with development of this toxicity (MPLC > or = 23.0 x 10(9) l(-1), 6 out of 29 cases; MPLC < 23.0 x 10(9) l(-1), 0 out of 23 cases; P = 0.020). These findings suggest that the effect of G-CSF is the main determinant of the pulmonary toxicity in these cases. Because the toxicity was associated with a large MPLC and did not recur in cases readministered G-CSF, an idiosyncratic reaction to G-CSF is unlikely to be the pathogenesis of this toxicity. Thus, lowering the G-CSF dose seems to be useful in the prevention of this toxicity. In all six cases, the time course of manifestation of the toxicity was the same, and early application of high-dose corticosteroid led to cure. This knowledge will be helpful in the care of similar cases.     

High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels

High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.     

High-dose ifosfamide plus adriamycin in the treatment of adult advanced soft tissue sarcomas: is it feasible?

BACKGROUND: Adriamycin (ADM) and ifosfamide (IFO) are the two most active agents in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with a clear dose-response relationship. We evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of a high-dose IFO-plus-ADM combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced disease and nine patients in adjuvant setting received IFO 12.5 g/m2 in 120-hour continuous infusion with Mesna uroprotection and ADM 20 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and G-CSF every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 89 chemotherapy cycles (70 cycles at full dose). Seventeen patients received the planned treatment, and nine patients required dose reductions. We observed grade 3-4 neutropenia in 52 cycles (59%)/20 patients; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 16 cycles (18%)/nine patients; grade 3-4 anaemia in 24 cycles (27%)/11 patients. Eight patients experienced febrile neutropenia and six patients required blood transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: While feasible, this regimen showed heavy toxicity. Nevertheless, 74% of the patients were able to complete the planned treatment. Adjustment of the schedule of IFO continuous infusion to improve this combination is currently under investigation.     

DNA unwinding in the CYC1 and DED1 yeast promoters

The superiority of intensive versus standard chemotherapy for aggressive (I: intermediate; H: high grade) NHL is still debated; increased antitumor activity may be counterbalanced by increased toxicity. We have designed a first-line five-drug regimen (vincristine, idarubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and deflazacort), with the aim of potentiating the CHOP protocol without losing tolerability and ease of administration. Seventy-one patients (33% aged > or = 65) entered the study. CR was obtained in 66.7% of patients (I: 74%; H: 56%), PR in 19.7%: overall response rate was 86.4%. Six patients were resistant, two died during treatment. With a median follow up of two years, relapse has occurred in 14 patients (8 I, 6 H). At 3 years, overall survival was projected to be 62.5% (I 73.5%; H 31.4%), disease free survival 66% (I 71%, H 56.3%). No organ toxicity occurred. Myelosuppression was moderate, with a nadir on the 14th day. Febrile episodes occurred in 16% of courses, dose delay in 19% of courses; dose reduction in 3% of patients. No patient required hospitalization. G-CSF was only occasionally used. This regimen has shown a potent antitumor effect with an excellent tolerance, even in elderly patients.     

Low-dose versus standard-dose lenograstim prophylaxis after chemotherapy: a randomized, crossover comparison

PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered prophylactically after chemotherapy reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia. This randomized crossover study was designed to assess whether a lower dose of G-CSF is as effective as a standard dose of 5 microg/kg daily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received standard-dose chemotherapy regimens expected to cause neutropenia received G-CSF (lenograstim) that started the day after chemotherapy for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered to greater than 10 x 10(9)/L. The lenograstim dose was randomly allocated to be 2 or 5 microg/kg daily in the first cycle of chemotherapy and crossed over to the alternate dose for the second cycle. The study was designed to accrue 40 assessable patients to provide a power of 80% to detect a difference in duration of neutropenia of 1 day. Fifty-two patients were randomized to treatment and 43 patients completed two cycles of identical chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was little neutropenia irrespective of the dose used. Twenty-three patients (53%) had no grade III or IV neutropenia and 30 patients (70%) had no grade IV neutropenia. Crossover trial methodology was used to assess the difference in outcome caused by the lower dose compared with the standard dose (estimated treatment effect). There was no significant difference in the measures of neutropenia, hospitalization, or other clinical outcomes. The 95% confidence interval (one-sided) for the additional duration of neutropenia caused by the lower dose of lenograstim was 0.43 days or less for grade III or IV neutropenia and 0.34 days or less for grade IV neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim 2 microg/kg provides similar protection to 5 microg/kg against neutropenia that complicates standard-dose chemotherapy. The use of a lower dose has important implications for the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic G-CSF therapy.     

High-dosage chemotherapy and the autologous transplantation of peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells in breast cancer: the initial results, analysis of toxicity and the necessary support means

BACKGROUND: In the last years high dose chemotherapy (HDC) schedules have been developed with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) which are very effective in breast cancer. Expectation has been raised concerning the cure of a subgroup of patients with metastatic breast cancer and the improvement of prognosis in high risk stages II and III. METHODS: CTCb (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin 800 mg/m2) was administered with autologous peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells transplantation (TACPHP) and granulocytic colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg/day to 27 patients with breast cancer: 9 in stage IV in complete remission, 12 in stage II with > or = 10 affected lymph nodes and 6 in stage III. RESULTS: No toxic deaths were reported. The median time to achieve > or = 0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils/l was 8 days, to > or = 20 x 10(9) platelets/l 9 days and to > or = 50 x 10(9) platelets/l 12 days. Fever was observed in 85% of the patients although its median duration was of only one day. Extrahematologic toxicity was moderate with grade III nausea/vomiting in 48% of patients, grade III mucositis in 22%, grade III hepatitis in 19%, and grade III diarrhea in 4%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. The median follow-up is still short (10 months, range: 2-25). All the patients maintain normal hematologic peripheral blood counts and only 4 (in stage IV) have relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: The slight extrahematologic toxicity observed in the high dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin, and the rapid hematologic recovery provided by the TACPHP and G-CSF allow the above schedule to be administered with moderate toxicity and no mortality. This low toxic profile leads to the possibility of future trials with this chemotherapy schedule in other subgroups of patients with breast cancer.     

BEACOPP, a new dose-escalated and accelerated regimen, is at least as effective as COPP/ABVD in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: interim report from a trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group

PURPOSE: The HD9 trial aims to evaluate whether moderate dose escalation and/or acceleration of standard polychemotherapy is beneficial for advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). Two variants of a novel bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) scheme (standard and escalated dose) are compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP)/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The randomized, three-arm trial recruited patients in stages IIB and IIIA with risk factors and stages IIIB and IV. BEACOPP in baseline dose contains all drug dosages of COPP/ABVD (except vincristine and procarbazine) rearranged in a shorter, 3-week cycle. Escalated BEACOPP uses higher doses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. After eight chemotherapy cycles, initial bulky and residual disease is irradiated. The trial is monitored and analyzed by means of a sequential strategy. RESULTS: An interim analysis with 505 assessable patients and a median follow-up of 23 months showed a significant inferiority (according to sequential monitoring strategy) of the COPP/ABVD regimen in progression rate and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) compared with the pooled results of both BEACOPP variants. The 24-month FFTF rate was 75% for COPP/ABVD and 84% for BEACOPP pooled (P = .034). There was 12% progressive disease with COPP/ABVD and 6% with BEACOPP pooled. Differences in survival were not significant in sequential analysis. The acute toxicity of baseline BEACOPP resembled that of COPP/ABVD; escalated BEACOPP showed increased but manageable hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Combined with local irradiation, BEACOPP in one or both variants shows superior disease control compared with COPP/ABVD, with acceptable acute toxicity. Further follow-up is required to assess the effect of dosage and the effect on survival and late toxicities.     

Networks of transcriptional regulation encoded in a grammatical model

In a prospective multicenter study 68 out of 158 patients with HIV infection and malignant lymphoma were assigned to a risk-adapted induction therapy using the following algorithm: High-risk patients fulfilled 2 of 3 criteria: T4 lymphocytes <50/microL; WHO activity index 3 or 4; pre-existing AIDS-defining opportunistic infection. Normal-risk patients received 4 to 6 cycles of CHOP chemotherapy; those that achieved complete remission (CR) received zidovudine (500 mg/d) and interferon-alpha maintenance therapy (5 million units three times a week) for one year. High-risk patients received low-dose CHOP or vincristine/prednisone chemotherapy. Supportive care was performed with pentamidine inhalation and G-CSF. Intrathecal (it) methotrexate was given for CNS prophylaxis. The median survival was 634 days for 38 patients of the normal-risk group and 129 days for 30 patients of the high-risk group. 18 high-risk patients treated with low-dose CHOP had better survival (156 days) than 12 patients treated with vincristine/prednisone (72 days p=0.044). 68% of the patients in the normal-risk group achieved complete remission. 5 out of 18 high-risk patients treated with low-dose CHOP achieved complete remission. Three normal-risk patients developed fatal opportunistic infections during chemotherapy. Immune parameters deteriorated after CHOP induction and partially recovered with maintenance treatment. We conclude that the normal-risk patients survived longer than reported in most published studies. Toxicity was low. Low-dose CHOP seems to be superior to vincristine/prednisone therapy in high-risk patients.     

Pulmonary toxicity in patients with advanced-stage germ cell tumors receiving bleomycin with and without granulocyte colony stimulating factor

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine whether co-administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and bleomycin results in enhanced pulmonary toxicity compared with bleomycin alone. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis comparing two groups of patients with advanced germ cell tumors receiving combination chemotherapy that includes bleomycin with or without G-CSF. SETTING: Indiana University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Group A consisted of 29 patients with advanced-stage germ cell tumors who were treated with combination chemotherapy that included bleomycin. All patients received concurrent prophylactic G-CSF. Group B consisted of 57 patients with advanced-stage germ cell tumors who were treated on a phase 3 study comparing standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) to BEP with twice the cisplatin dose. None of these patients received growth factor. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients who received concurrent chemotherapy and G-CSF, ten (34%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9 to 54.3%) were believed to have clinically significant bleomycin toxicity. Of the 57 patients who did not receive growth factor, 19 (33%; 95% CI, 21.4 to 47.1%) had bleomycin-related toxicity. There was no difference in the incidence of pulmonary toxicity between the groups (p = 1.00 by Fisher's Exact Test). CONCLUSIONS: There is no increase in pulmonary toxicity with co-administration of G-CSF and bleomycin compared to bleomycin alone in patients with advanced germ cell tumors.     

Moderate dose escalation for advanced stage Hodgkin's disease using the bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone scheme and adjuvant radiotherapy: a study of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group

The BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) regimen, a rearranged and accelerated version of the standard COPP/adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective and safe in a previous pilot study for advanced stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). The present study aimed to determine a maximum practicable dose of three drugs, ie, etoposide, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, for which acute toxicities were acceptable and to assess the feasibility of the escalated scheme. Sixty untreated patients with advanced stage HD were enrolled in this study. Radiotherapy was given in 44 patients (73%) after chemotherapy to initial bulk lesions and residual disease. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given from day 8 to prevent prolonged neutrocytopenia and severe infections. The intended doses of adriamycin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide in the BEACOPP schedule could be substantially escalated: adriamycin from 25 to 35, cyclophosphamide from 650 to 1,200, and etoposide from 100 to 200 mg/m2. The major toxicities were leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia with considerable heterogeneity between individual patients. Of 60 patients, 56 (93%) achieved a complete remission (CR). At a median observation of 32 months, the rates of survival and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) were estimated to be 91% (95% confidence interval 83% to 99%) and 90% (82% to 98%). These results show that a moderate dose escalation of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide of the baseline BEACOPP regimen is feasible. The escalated BEACOPP regimen shows very encouraging results in advanced stage HD and is now being compared in a randomized phase III study with BEACOPP at baseline dose level.     

Paclitaxel plus high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Based on the single-agent activity of both paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of the two drugs in patients with refractory and relapsed aggressive NHL. All patients received 900 mg/m2 bolus of cyclophosphamide intravenously daily for 3 consecutive days with a concurrent infusion of 150 mg/m2 of paclitaxel over 72 h (50 mg/m2/d). 24 h after the completion of chemotherapy, patients received subcutaneous injections of 5 microg/kg of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) daily until white cell count recovery. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients who had at least a partial response (PR) after two courses continued to receive a maximum of four courses. Patients with responding disease were allowed to undergo high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem-cell/bone marrow transplantation if they were eligible. Of the 77 patients who were eligible for the study, 74 (96%) were evaluable for toxicity and treatment response. The overall response rate was 45% (95% CI 33-57%). Patients who received treatment after their disease relapsed from a complete response (CR) had an 81% response rate (38% CRs), whereas those with primary refractory disease had a 22% response rate. Toxicities of > grade 2 included alopecia (100%) and stomatitis (25%). Neutropenic fever of grade > 2 occurred after 18% of the courses, and platelet count of < or = 20 x 10(9)/l developed after 20% of the courses. Thus, the combination of paclitaxel plus high-dose cyclophosphamide is an effective new regimen in the treatment of refractory and relapsed NHL.     

Phase III comparative trial using CHOP vs CIOP in the treatment of advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Until now, literature data support the fact that the CHOP regimen represents the standard first line treatment for patients with advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Recently, idarubicin has been introduced in clinical trials because of its favourable preclinical profile: it is more active than daunorubicin and doxorubicin against a number of experimental tumour systems and is significantly less cardiotoxic in animal models. From March 1991 to June 1993, 115 previously untreated patients with stage II to IV intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, according to the Kiel classification, were enrolled in a phase III comparative trial. The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and safety of using idarubicin instead of doxorubicin in the polychemotherapeutic regimen CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone). Of the 115 patients registered for the trial, 103 were evaluable: 52 received CH (doxorubicin)OP and 51 received CI(Idarubicin)OP. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed among the two groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the rates of partial and complete response. The overall response rate was 87%, with complete response in 62%: 63% in the CHOP group, and 59% in the CIOP group. At 30 months (median 20 months), 86% of all CR patients were alive without disease in the CHOP group and 85% in the CIOP group. Patients treated with CHOP experienced severe alopecia more frequently (P = .004). Only three patients in the CIOP group showed cardiac adverse events (1 moderate and 2 mild), while in the CHOP group 4 mild, 2 moderate and 1 severe were recorded. LVEF monitoring was carried out in 31 patients of the CHOP group and in 27 of the CIOP group. A median drop of 8.3% of the LVEF was observed in patients treated with CHOP regimen as compared to 4.8% in patients with CIOP regimen (P = .0001). In this trial, the "idarubicin arm" (CIOP regimen) was found to have an equivalent therapeutic efficacy and, slightly, reduced clinical toxicity in comparison to the standard doxorubicin-containing CHOP regimen in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy after radiation therapy in stage I low-grade and intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Results of a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: In a prospective randomized manner, this study evaluated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; CHOP) in patients with Stage I non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who have achieved a complete response (CR) after radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Forty-four patients with clinical or pathologic Stage I intermediate-grade or low-grade NHL were randomized to receive regional RT alone (median dose, 40 Gy) or regional RT followed by six cycles of CHOP chemotherapy. There were no differences in clinical and pathologic characteristics between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 7 years (range, 2-10 years). The actuarial relapse-free survival (RFS) rate for the RT plus CHOP group at 7 years was 83% compared with 47% (P < 0.03) for the RT-alone group. The overall survival (OS) for the two groups was 88% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.2). In patients with intermediate-grade NHL, the 7-year actuarial RFS for RT and CHOP was 86% compared with 20% for RT alone (P = 0.004). The corresponding actuarial survival rates were 92% and 47%, respectively (P = 0.08). In patients with low-grade histologic findings, the addition of adjuvant CHOP did not improve RFS (P = 0.6) or OS. All relapses in this study were at sites remote from the initially involved areas, and in 5 of 11 patients (45%), there were recurrences 5 years or longer after initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that adjuvant CHOP chemotherapy significantly improves RFS in patients with Stage I intermediate-grade NHL who achieve a CR after regional-field RT. The chemotherapeutic regimen favorably affected their probability of survival.     

Confocal microscopic localization of anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein autoantibodies in a patient with peripheral neuropathy initially lacking a detectable IgM gammopathy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The neutropenia induced by six courses of an intensified FEC regimen is expected to be checked by early primary administration of G-CSF which is stopped eight days before the next chemotherapy course. Less information is available about megakaryocytic and erythroid toxicity over six courses. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer completed six courses of a randomized treatment with two FEC regimens administered every 21 days, in which 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 5-FUwas associated with 60 or 120 mg/m2 of epirubicin (60FEC, 35 patients, vs 120FEC, 31 patients). 120FEC was supported by early primary G-CSF (days 4 to 13). Blood counts were obtained seven times during each course. RESULTS: The non-hematologic toxicity over 364 courses was similar in 60FEC and 120FEC. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was observed for white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT), while for hemoglobin (Hb) a somewhat higher cumulative toxicity was observed with 120FEC than with 60FEC. WBC, PLT and Hb grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 40.1% and 45.6% (P=ns), in 23.1% and 0.8% (P <.0001) and in 15.6% and 3.0% (P <.005) of the two regimens, respectively. There were no febrile or hemorrhagic episodes. The epirubicin relative dose intensity delivered was 1.95 in 120FEC with respect to 60FEC. CONCLUSIONS: Our G-CSF schedule permitted to deliver six courses of 120FEC without any clinically relevant side effects. Grade III-IV leukopenia was similar with 120FEC and 60FEC, while grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more often with 120FEC than with 60FEC.     

A phase I/II study of multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy supported with G-CSF, or G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in whole blood, in two consecutive cohorts of patients

We investigated the reconstitutive potential of haematopoietic progenitor cells collected in autologous whole blood during multicycle dose-intensified chemotherapy. Forty patients with metastatic solid tumours were treated with up to six cycles of cisplatin and escalating doses of ifosfamide every 14 days. Cisplatin was administered in 3% sodium chloride over 3 h, followed by ifosfamide over 24 h and mesna over 36 h. The first cohort of patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 4-14. Once dose-limiting toxicity was reached in cohort 1, the study continued with a second cohort of patients, in whom, in addition to G-CSF on days 4-14, 500 ml of G-CSF and chemotherapy-'primed' whole blood was collected on day 15, i.e. on day 1 of treatment cycles two to six, before cisplatin administration. This volume of blood was kept unprocessed at 4 degrees C and reinfused 20-24 h after the completion of ifosfamide. In cohort 1, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at ifosfamide 6.0 g m(-2) with two out of six of the patients developing neutropenic fever. Although in cohort 2 no neutropenic fever was encountered, neither the frequency nor the duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reduced. Cumulative asthenia resulted in DLT at 7.0 g m(-2). The median number of CD34+ cells in 500 ml of whole blood after the first cycle (i.e. at start of cycle 2) was 1.15 x 10(6) kg(-1). This number was significantly greater after the second cycle (2.06 x 10(6) kg(-1), P = 0.01) and then gradually decreased after cycles three to six. After storing whole blood, the number of CD34+ cells had not decreased (median + 10%). We conclude that the method of combined bone marrow support by G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in autologous whole blood collected before each cycle of a 2-weekly regimen of cisplatin-ifosfamide does not result in clinically measurable reduced bone marrow toxicity compared with what can be expected by the use of G-CSF alone.     

A multicenter randomized Phase II trial of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-supported, platinum-based chemotherapy with flexible midcycle cisplatin administration in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. PSAMOMA Cooperative Group, Spain

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to platinum-based combination chemotherapy could increase platinum dose intensity and response rates and decrease hematologic toxicity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced ovarian carcinoma (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage IIC-IV) were treated after maximum debulking surgery with cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2, and carboplatin, 350 mg/m2, on Day 1 plus cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, on Day 14 when clinically indicated (adequate bone marrow and renal function). Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy supported with G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously on Days 2-13; Arm B). RESULTS: Between November 1993 and April 1995, 80 patients were included. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for dose intensity calculations. Both groups were well matched with regard to age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histopathologic subtype, tumor grade, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. The dose intensities calculated in mg/m2/week for cyclophosphamide and carboplatin were similar in both groups; however, the dose intensity of cisplatin was higher in Arm B (5.7 mg/m2 vs. 10.3 mg/m2). The occurrence of Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3-4 neutropenia was less common in the G-CSF arm (55% vs. 7.7%). Response rates (52% vs. 68%) and pathologic complete responses (32% vs. 25%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS; The addition of G-CSF to this platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma resulted in a modest increment in platinum dose intensity and appeared to reduce the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia.     

PBLs of early breast carcinoma patients with a high nuclear grade tumor unlike PBLs of cervical carcinoma patients do not show a decreased TCR zeta expression but are functionally impaired

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of hematopoietic growth factors in association with chemotherapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has been recommended, but few studies have evaluated its cost-effectiveness. DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were analyzed in 33 consecutive patients with HIV-related NHL treated at a single institution with the same chemotherapy program, ProMACE-CytaBOM, with G-CSF, in 21 cases diagnosed after December 31, 1991, or without G-CSF, in 12 cases diagnosed earlier. Pearson's chi-square analysis and the two-sided Student's t-test were used for statistical comparisons. The method of Kaplan-Meyer and the log-rank-test were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: G-CSF support significantly reduced the frequency of day-1 drug dose reductions (p < 0.001) and of chemotherapy delays (p < 0.001), and improved the actual delivered doses of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (p < 0.02). In patients with a CD4+ count < 0.01 x 10(9)/L, chemotherapy could be given at full doses in 90% of cycles with G-CSF compared to only 20% without it. G-CSF affected neither the frequency and duration of fever and hospitalization nor the complete remission and survival rates after stratification according to the CD4+ count. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF support significantly improved dose-intensity in patients with HIV-related NHL treated with aggressive chemotherapy, particularly in the subgroup with a CD4+ count < 0.1 x 10(9)/L, but it did not improve their clinical outcome.     

老年乳腺癌术后多西紫杉醇联合环磷酰胺辅助化疗的毒副作用研究

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the side effects of docetaxel with cyclophosphamide as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: Thirty-six operable elderly breast cancer patients at intermediate risk based on the St Gallen risk classi.cation underwent modified radical mastectomy and then were given four cycles of TC regimen (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; every 21 days ). Primary prophylaxis granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 200μg i.h. was administered on day 4-6. Results: The main side effect was neutropenia. Grade 3 neutropenia developed in 36.1% and G4 in 19.4%, respectively. Most of the other side effects were G1-2. Dose reduction occurred in 11.1% patients. The completion rate of chemotherapy was 100%. Conclusion:Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen with G-CSF primary prophylaxis is tolerable for elderly patients in general good condition.     

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate and survival of chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with topotecan, and to determine the relationship of topotecan pharmacokinetics with response and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with previously untreated, extensive-stage SCLC received 2.0 mg/m2 of topotecan daily for 5 days. The first 13 patients were treated without colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support; the next 35 patients received 5 micrograms/kg of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 10 to 14 days starting on day 6. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles. Patients who had a partial response to topotecan after four cycles, stable disease after two cycles, or progressive disease at any time received salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide. Topotecan pharmacokinetics were measured using a four-point sampling scheme. RESULTS: Of 48 patients, none had a complete response and 19 had a partial response, for an objective response rate of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2% to 53.0%). The median response duration was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 7.3). After a median follow-up duration of 18.2 months, the overall median survival time was 10.0 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.7); the 1-year survival rate was 39% (95% CI, 25.2% to 53.0%). Eight of 34 patients (24%) who received salvage chemotherapy responded. Four of 17 patients who did not respond to first-line therapy with topotecan responded to cisplatin and etoposide. The most common toxicity was hematologic. Ninety-two percent of patients treated without G-CSF developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, compared with 29% who received G-CSF. However, the incidence of neutropenic fevers was similar between the two groups (8% and 11%, respectively), and one patient in each group died of neutropenic fevers. There were no differences in objective tumor response, duration of response, time to treatment failure, or survival between the 13 patients who entered the study before G-CSF administration was mandated and the 35 patients who entered after and received G-CSF. There was poor correlation between the WBC count and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) and both the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration++ (Cmx) of total topotecan in plasma. There was no correlation between the tumor response and either AUC or Cmx of total topotecan. CONCLUSION: The activity of topotecan in extensive-stage SCLC noted in this study warrants further investigation of this agent in phase III clinical trials.