DNA replication of human papillomavirus type 31 is modulated by elements of the upstream regulatory region that lie 5' of the minimal origin

The viral replication factors E1 and E2 of papillomaviruses are necessary and sufficient to replicate plasmids containing the minimal origin of DNA replication in transient assays. Under physiological conditions, the upstream regulatory region (URR) governs expression of the early viral genes. To determine the effect of URR elements on E1 and E2 expression specifically, and on the regulation of DNA replication during the various phases of the viral life cycle, we carried out a systematic replication study with entire genomes of human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31), a high-risk oncogenic type. We constructed a series of URR deletions, spacer replacements, and point mutations to analyze the role of the keratinocyte enhancer (KE) element, the auxiliary enhancer (AE) domain, and the L1-proximal end of the URR (5'-URR domain) in DNA replication during establishment, maintenance, and vegetative viral DNA amplification. Using transient and stable replication assays, we demonstrate that the KE and AE are necessary for efficient E1 and E2 gene expression and that the KE can also directly modulate viral replication. KE-mediated activation of replication is dependent on the position and orientation of the element. Mutation of either one of the four Ap1 sites, the single Sp1 site, or the binding site for the uncharacterized footprint factor 1 reduced replication efficiency through decreased expression of E1 and E2. Furthermore, the 5'-URR domain and the Oct1 DNA binding site are dispensable for viral replication, since such HPV31 mutants are able to replicate efficiently in a transient assay, maintain a stable copy number over several cell generations, and amplify viral DNA under vegetative conditions. Interestingly, deletion of the 5'-URR domain leads to increased transient and stable replication levels. These findings suggest that elements in the HPV31 URR outside the minimal origin modulate viral replication through both direct and indirect mechanisms.     

Different HPV16 E6/E7 oncogene expression patterns in epithelia reconstructed from HPV16-immortalized human endocervical cells and genital keratinocytes

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6/E7 oncogenes immortalize two types of human genital epithelial cells in vitro, endocervical cells and ectocervical or foreskin keratinocytes. Epithelia reconstructed in in vivo nude mouse implants or in vitro organotypic raft cultures from immortalized endocervical cells form higher grade dysplasia than those from keratinocytes. Here, we compared viral E6/E7 mRNA expression in immortalized cell lines of the three cell types using implants, rafts and in situ hybridization assays. Endocervical cells expressed E6/E7 throughout their reconstructed epithelia. In contrast, oncogenes were limited to basal cells for keratinocyte lower grade dysplasias. To study the role of the HPV16 promoter/enhancer in this repression in the upper layers of keratinocyte epithelia, new cell lines were established by immortalization with E6/E7 controlled by the SV40 promoter. The oncogenes were shown to be controlled from the SV40 elements after immortalization. Nevertheless, E6/E7 in the two cell types had the same cell-specific expression pattern as that controlled from the homologous HPV16 promoter. In addition, naturally occurring premalignant lesions having integrated HPV16 DNA expressed E6/E7 extensively in the high-grade dysplastic region of undifferentiated metaplasia. On the other hand, oncogene expression was restricted to lower layers in the lower grade dysplastic region of more mature differentiation. Our data suggest that keratinocytes have an inherent HPV16 promoter-nonspecific mechanism of repression. Apparently this mechanism, which can be acquired during maturation, is initially nonfunctional in in vitro and in vivo epithelia derived from metaplastic endocervical cells.     

Retinoic acid-mediated down-regulation of Oct3/4 coincides with the loss of promoter occupancy in vivo

Oct3/4, a hallmark of the earliest stages of embryogenesis, is expressed in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma (EC) and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Oct3/4 gene expression is dependent on the promoter region, the proximal enhancer and the newly identified distal enhancer. We have analysed in vivo occupancy of these elements. In undifferentiated EC and ES cells, strong footprints were detected at specific sites of all three regulatory elements. These were promptly lost upon RA treatment in ES cells and in P19 EC cells, in parallel with sharply reduced Oct3/4 mRNA levels. Thus, the occupancy of regulatory elements is coupled with Oct3/4 expression, and RA treatment causes coordinated factor displacement, leading to extinction of gene activity. In F9 EC cells, footprint was first abolished at the proximal enhancer. However, this loss of binding site occupancy did not result in a decrease in Oct3/4 mRNA levels. The partial factor displacement seen in F9 EC cells, combined with the observation that EC and ES cells utilize the proximal and distal enhancers in differential manner, indicate the complex pattern of Oct3/4 gene regulation, which could reflect a cell type- and lineage-specific expression of the gene in vivo.     

Transcriptional regulation of the EGF receptor promoter by HPV16 and retinoic acid in human ectocervical epithelial cells

We have previously demonstrated that human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-immortalized human ectocervical epithelial cells and cells derived from tumors which express HPV16 oncogenes express high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) compared to normal cervical cells. We have also shown that proliferation of these cells is inhibited by retinoid treatment. We have hypothesized that the retinoid inhibition of cell proliferation may be due to the retinoid-dependent reduction in EGFR level. In this study we examine the regulation of EGFR expression in cervical cells with emphasis on two aspects: (1) the mechanism of retinoid-dependent suppression of EGFR levels in HPV16-positive cells and (2) the mechanism of EGFR upregulation by HPV16. EGFR levels were found to be elevated 5-, 3. 7-, and 1.25-fold in the HPV16-immortalized ECE16-1, ECE16-D1, and ECE16-D2 cells, respectively, compared to normal cervical cells. Treatment of ECE16-1 and ECE16-D1 cells with retinoic acid suppresses proliferation, EGFR level, EGFR mRNA level, and EGFR promoter activity. The reduction in EGFR promoter activity appears to account for the reduction in EGFR protein and mRNA levels. In contrast, retinoic acid does not affect cell growth or EGFR level in ECE16-D2 cells or normal cervical cells. To study the mechanisms regulating EGFR expression in HPV16-positive cells, normal ECE cells were cotransfected with an EGFR promoter reporter plasmid and an expression plasmid encoding the HPV16 E6/E7 open reading frames. In the presence of E6/E7, EGFR promoter activity was increased by 2- to 3-fold, suggesting that the E6/E7 proteins are directly or indirectly responsible for the increased EGFR level and that the EGFR promoter contains the DNA elements necessary to mediate this response. Nevertheless expression of E6/E7 proteins did not confer retinoic acid regulation, as EGFR promoter activity remained elevated in normal cells cotransfected with pHPVE6/E7 and treated with retinoic acid. These results suggest that human papillomavirus and retinoic acid regulate EGFR levels by independent effects on the EGFR promoter.