Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: Historically, the acute rejection rates in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients have been extremely high (50-80%), with many second and third rejection episodes despite the use of quadruple immunosuppression (antibody induction and cyclosporine [CsA]-azathioprine [AZA]-based maintenance immunosuppression). Although this acute rejection has rarely led to graft loss, it has been a great cause of morbidity and of significantly increased cost. In an attempt to decrease the acute rejection rate and related morbidity in SPK transplant recipients, we compared two "state-of-the-art" immunosuppression regimens in a prospective, randomized, single-center study. METHODS: Patients who received SPK transplants were randomized to receive either tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=18) or CsA (Neoral formulation) and MMF (n=18). All patients received OKT3 induction and prednisone, which was tapered to 5 mg/day by 6 months after transplantation. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven. In addition, metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, serum cholesterol), drug toxicity, and infection also were measured. Data were compared with that of a historical group (n=18) who received conventional CsA (Sandimmune formulation) and AZA-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11% in both the TAC-MMF and CsA-MMF groups with only two patients in each group experiencing a rejection episode. This rejection rate was significantly decreased from that of the CsA-AZA historical group (77%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in infection rates, including cytomegalovirus, or in metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, and cholesterol levels). All patients remained on their initial immunosuppression regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Between 3 and 6 months after transplantation, three patients were switched from TAC to CsA for recurrent migraine headaches, posttransplant diabetes, and chronic cytomegalovirus infection. Two patients in the CsA-MMF group died of nonimmunologic causes (aspiration pneumonia and arrhythmia) between 3 and 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study show that MMF treatment significantly decreases the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in SPK transplant recipients compared with AZA-treated historical controls. In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control.     

Follicular fluid immunoreactive-inhibin concentrations in relation to follicular diameter and estradiol-17 beta, progesterone and testosterone concentrations in individual ovarian follicles in buffalo, Bubalus bubalis

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil reduces episodes of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection or treatment failure in the first year after kidney transplantation; however, limited data exist regarding the efficacy after lung transplantation. METHODS: In a 2-center, nonrandomized concurrent cohort study (level III evidence), we analyzed the incidence of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or=A2) and decrement in pulmonary function during the first 12 months after successful lung transplantation. All patients received induction immunosuppression with antithymocyte globulin (< or=5 days' duration), cyclosporine and prednisone, in addition to either mycophenolate mofetil (2.0 g/d) [n=11] or azathioprine (1 to 2 mg/kg per day) [n=11]. RESULTS: During the first 12 months after lung transplantation, the mycophenolate mofetil group experienced significantly fewer episodes of acute cellular rejection than the azathioprine group (0.26+/-0.34 vs 0.72+/-0.43 episodes/100 patient-days [mean+/-SD], p < 0.01; 95% CI for the difference=0.126 to 0.813). The change in forced expiratory volume -1 second [deltaFEV1] (liters) between the 3rd and 12th months after lung transplantation was analyzed for the two treatment groups. For this interval, deltaFEV1 for the mycophenolate mofetil group was +0.158+/-0.497 L vs -0.281+/-0.406 L for the azathioprine group (p < 0.05; 95% CI for difference=+0.0356 to 0.843). During the first year, there was 1 death in each group attributed to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome with concurrent pneumonia. There were no differences in incidence of cytomegalovirus or bacterial infections between the treatment groups; however, a higher prevalence of aspergillus sp airway colonization in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was observed for the mycophenolate mofetil group (p < .05). The prevalence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome at 12 months was 36% for the azathioprine group vs 18% for the mycophenolate mofetil group (p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with mycophenolate mofetil after lung transplantation suggests a decreased incidence of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection. Furthermore, less decline in FEV1 after 12 months may suggest a reduced incidence or delayed onset for development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Prospective randomized trials with low beta error (level I evidence) should be performed to assess the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil vis-à-vis acute allograft rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.     

Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: The long-term complications of immunosuppressive therapy such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are a major source of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study we completely withdrew prednisone (PRED) 14 days after liver transplantation in an effort to decrease these metabolic complications. Patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral formulation) or tacrolimus (TAC). Thus, we also were able to compare CsA to TAC in patients not receiving PRED with respect to efficacy, toxicity, and effect on posttransplant metabolic complications. METHODS: A total of 71 patients were randomized to receive either TAC-MMF (n=35) or CsA-MMF (n=36) after liver transplantation and were analyzed for patient and graft survival. Fifty-eight patients continued the immunosuppressive protocol for at least 6 months after transplantation and were analyzed for the incidence of acute rejection and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: The 6-month patient survival rates were 94.4% for CsA-MMF and 88.6% for TAC-MMF. Corresponding 6-month graft survival rates were 88.7% and 85.71% with no immunologic graft losses in either group. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 46% for CsA-MMF and 42.3% for TAC-MMF. Six patients were converted from CsA to TAC (four for recurrent rejection) and seven patients were converted from TAC to CsA (four for neurotoxicity). Only one patient (in the TAC-MMF group) developed new-onset posttransplant diabetes. In contrast, four of eight patients in the CsA-MMF group who were diabetic before transplant became nondiabetic in the first 3 months after transplant. The mean serum cholesterol level was significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (145.2+/-41.8 mg/dl and 190.3+/-62.2, respectively; P<0.001) and the incidence of hypertension was lower in the TAC-MMF group (12% vs. 30.3% in the CsA-MMF group, P<0.01). Both groups had a lower incidence of metabolic complications compared with a historical group (n=100) maintained on CsA and PRED (10 mg/day at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: MMF in combination with either TAC or CsA allows withdrawal of PRED 14 days after liver transplantation with a moderate rejection rate and no immunologic graft losses. Early PRED withdrawal decreases posttransplant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, but patients maintained on TAC have lower serum cholesterol levels and a lower incidence of hypertension than CsA-treated patients.     

Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. METHODS: Patients with preformed reactive antibodies < 500% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age > or = 40 years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time > or = 24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. RESULTS: delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (24%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159+/-59 micromol/1. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.     

A study comparing mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cell-Cept) is a potent and selective inhibitor of B and T lymphocyte proliferation that has proven effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients in several randomized, blinded clinical studies. Because the frequency and characteristics of rejection episodes may be different and more severe after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, we hypothesized that MMF would have a significant impact on pancreas-kidney rejection and graft outcome. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of MMF versus azathioprine (AZA) in cyclosporine-treated simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of 358 consecutive primary SPK transplantations performed from 1990 to 1997 was conducted. Patients received either MMF (n=109, 3 g/day) or AZA (n=249, 2 mg/kg q.d.) in combination with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. All patients received a quadruple-drug sequential induction protocol with either OKT3 or Atgam. Several outcome parameters, including patient and graft survival rates and frequency of rejection, were analyzed. RESULTS: MMF-treated patients demonstrated a markedly reduced rate of biopsy-proven kidney rejection (31 vs. 75% AZA, P=0.0001), clinically significant pancreas rejection (7 vs. 24% AZA; P=0.003), and steroid-refractory rejection (15 vs. 52% AZA; P=0.01). As a result, kidney and pancreas allograft survival was significantly better in MMF patients compared with AZA patients (2-year survival rates: kidney, 95 vs. 86%; and pancreas, 95 vs. 83%). Although surgical infections after transplantation were more frequent in MMF patients, MMF patients were more likely to have undergone enteric drainage. Importantly, we did not observe an increased incidence of any of the bacterial, fungal, or viral infections that typically plague immunosuppressed transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates that MMF is a highly effective immunosuppressant in SPK transplantation. It is not associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections when a balanced immunosuppressive management approach is used. MMF strikingly reduces the frequency of acute cellular and steroid-resistant rejection. As a result of this combined experience, it is not unexpected then that we observe significantly improved graft survival rates in MMF-treated SPK patients compared with patients receiving a more traditional immunosuppressive regimen.     

Influence of panel-reactive antibody on survival and rejection after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) is commonly used before thoracic organ transplantation to estimate a potential recipient's degree of humoral sensitization. METHODS: To assess the influence of an elevated PRA on survival and the incidence of rejection in pulmonary transplantation, the records of 247 patients that underwent single or double lung transplantation were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 247 patients (8.5%) had PRA values greater than 10%. Survival of this population was not significantly different from that of patients with low PRA levels: 74% (low PRA) vs 65% (elevated PRA) at 1 year and 58% in both groups at 3 years. The acute rejection rates (episodes/first 100 days) for the elevated and low PRA groups were 2.1 and 1.9, respectively (p = NS). Obliterative bronchiolitis developed in 38.9% of the high and 31.2% of the low PRA groups (p = NS). Six of 247 patients had a retrospective positive lymphocytotoxic cross-match result; three had PRA values greater than 10%. Patients with a positive cross-match result experienced similar survival and incidence of rejection as the remainder of the population. Among 957 patients evaluated for lung transplantation, 16 (1.7%) had a PRA (with dithiothreitol) greater than 15%. All had a history of pregnancy, blood transfusion, connective tissue disease, or previous transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Humoral sensitization is uncommon in the lung transplantation population. A modestly elevated PRA does not predict survival or the development of acute rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans. PRA testing before lung transplantation should be reserved for those patients with specific risk factors for humoral sensitization.     

Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group

BACKGROUND: Currently available immunosuppressive regimens for cadaver-kidney recipients are far from ideal because acute-rejection episodes occur in about 30% to 50% of these patients. In the phase III study described here we assessed the ability of basiliximab, a chimeric interleukin (IL)-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, to prevent acute-rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. METHODS: 380 adult recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney transplant were randomly allocated, in this double-blind trial, to receive a 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 (day of surgery) and on day 4, to provide IL-2-receptor suppression for 4-6 weeks (n=193), or to receive placebo (n=187). Both groups received baseline dual immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin and steroids throughout the study. The primary outcome measure was incidence of acute-rejection episodes during the 6 months after transplantation. Safety and tolerability were monitored over the 12 months of the study. FINDINGS: 376 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis (basiliximab, n=190; placebo, n=186). No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection 6 months after transplantation was 51 (29.8%) of 171 in the basiliximab group compared with 73 (44.0%) of 166 in the placebo group (32% reduction; 14.2% difference [95% Kaplan-Meier CIs 3% to 24%], p=0.012). The incidence of steroid-resistant first rejection episodes that required antibody therapy was significantly lower in the basiliximab group (10% vs 23.1%, 13.1% difference [5.4% to 20.8%], p<0.001). At weeks 2 and 4 post-transplantation, the mean daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the placebo group (p<0.001 with one-way analysis of variance). The incidence of graft loss at 12 months post-transplantation was 23 (12.1%) of 190 in the basiliximab group and 25 (13.4%) of 186 in the placebo group (1.3% difference [-5% to 9%], p=0.591). The incidence of infection and other adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. The acute tolerability of basiliximab was excellent, with no evidence of cytokine-release syndrome. 14 deaths (basiliximab n=9; placebo n=5; -2.0% difference [-6% to 2%], p=0.293) occurred during the 12-month study and a further three deaths (basiliximab n=1; placebo n=2) occurred within the 380-day cut-off period. One post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was recorded in each group. INTERPRETATION: Prophylaxis with 40 mg basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes significantly, with no clinically relevant safety or tolerability concerns.     

Photopheresis for the prevention of rejection in cardiac transplantation. Photopheresis Transplantation Study Group

BACKGROUND: Photopheresis is an immunoregulatory technique in which lymphocytes are reinfused after exposure to a photoactive compound (methoxsalen) and ultraviolet A light. We performed a preliminary study to assess the safety and efficacy of photopheresis in the prevention of acute rejection of cardiac allografts. METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive eligible recipients of primary cardiac transplants were randomly assigned to standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) alone or in conjunction with photopheresis. The photopheresis group received a total of 24 photopheresis treatments, each pair of treatments given on two consecutive days, during the first six months after transplantation. The regimen for maintenance immunosuppression, the definition and treatment of rejection episodes, the use of prophylactic antibiotics, and the schedule for cardiac biopsies were standardized among all 12 study centers. All the cardiac-biopsy samples were graded in a blinded manner at a central pathology laboratory. Plasma from the subgroup of 34 patients (57 percent) who were enrolled at the nine U.S. centers was analyzed by polymerase-chain-reaction amplification for cytomegalovirus DNA. RESULTS: After six months of follow-up, the mean (+/-SD) number of episodes of acute rejection per patient was 1.44+/-1.0 in the standard-therapy group, as compared with 0.91+/-1.0 in the photopheresis group (P=0.04). Significantly more patients in the photopheresis group had one rejection episode or none (27 of 33) than in the standard-therapy group (14 of 27), and significantly fewer patients in the photopheresis group had two or more rejection episodes (6 of 33) than in the standard-therapy group (13 of 27, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the time to a first episode of rejection, the incidence of rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, or survival at 6 and 12 months. Although there were no significant differences in the rates or types of infection, cytomegalovirus DNA was detected significantly less frequently in the photopheresis group than in the standard-therapy group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the addition of photopheresis to triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy significantly decreased the risk of cardiac rejection without increasing the incidence of infection.     

A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplant recipients: an interim report

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are newly approved immunosuppressive agents. However, the safety and efficacy of the combination of MMF and Tac in primary liver transplantation has not been determined. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, open-label prospective randomized protocol was initiated to study the efficacy and toxicity of Tac and steroids (double-drug therapy) versus Tac, steroids, and MMF (triple-drug therapy) in primary adult liver transplant recipients. Both groups of patients began on the same doses of Tac and steroids. Patients randomized to triple-drug therapy also received 1 g of MMF twice a day. RESULTS: Between August 1995 and January 1997, 200 patients were enrolled, 99 in double-drug therapy and 101 in triple-drug therapy. All patients were followed until May 1997, with a mean follow-up of 12.7 months. During the study period, 28 of 99 patients in double-drug therapy received MMF to control ongoing acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and/or neurotoxicity. On the other hand, 61 patients in triple-drug therapy discontinued MMF for infection, myelosuppression, and/or gastrointestinal disturbances. By an "intention-to-treat analysis," the actuarial 1-year patient survival rate was 85.1% in double-drug therapy and 83.1% in triple-drug therapy (P=0.77). The actuarial 1-year graft survival rate was 80.2% for double-drug therapy and 79.2% for triple-drug therapy (P=0.77). Forty-one patients (41.4%) in double-drug therapy and 32 (31.7%) in triple-drug therapy had at least one episode of rejection, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.15). The mean maintenance dose of corticosteroids was slightly lower in triple-drug compared with double-drug therapy. CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survival rates were similar in both groups. There was a trend to a lower incidence of rejection, reduced nephrotoxicity, and a lesser amount of maintenance corticosteroids in triple-drug therapy compared with double-drug therapy.     

Determinants of late allograft nephrectomy

When loss of graft function occurs more than six months after transplantation, allograft nephrectomy is not routinely performed at the time of graft failure. It is usually performed only on those patients who subsequently develop specific complications. However, little is known about the characteristics that make patients more likely to require allograft nephrectomy. The purpose of our study was to identify risk factors for the subsequent need for allograft nephrectomy in patients with graft failure occurring more than 6 months after transplantation. Forty-one patients were studied. Inclusion criteria were: loss of graft function > or = 6 months after transplantation, resumption of dialysis and initiation of weaning from immunosuppression. Thirty patients were treated with cyclosporine + prednisone +/- azathioprine and 11 with azathioprine + prednisone. Mean follow-up time was 17.8 months, ranging from 6 months to 6.1 years. Recipient age, sex and race, original renal disease, donor, donor source (cadaveric vs living related), HLA compatibility, levels of panel reactive antibodies, occurrence of initial delayed graft function, causes of graft failure and tapering of immunosuppression were similar in patients with and without allograft nephrectomy. Using univariate analysis, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent in patients with a history of 2 or more episodes of acute rejection than in patients with no rejection episode: 83% vs 30% (p = 0.03). In addition, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent if the immunosuppressive regimen included cyclosporine (62% vs 27.3%; p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis however, the number of previous episodes of rejection was found to be the only significant predictor for allograft nephrectomy. None of the other variables considered in the multivariate analysis, including the type of immunosuppressive therapy, was identified as a significant predictor for the need to perform allograft nephrectomy. In summary, the need for late allograft nephrectomy was correlated with the number of previous episodes of acute rejection. Patients with a history of numerous rejection episodes should thus be considered more likely to require allograft nephrectomy once immunosuppression is withdrawn. Possible interventions to reduce or prevent the need for nephrectomy include more gradual tapering of immunosuppression at the time of graft failure or indefinite low-dose immunosuppressive therapy.     

Steroid-free immunosuppression after kidney transplantation with antithymocyte globulin induction and cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND: Our goal in clinical renal transplantation is to find immunosuppressive procedures that not only promote long-term patient and graft survival but also improve the overall well-being of the patients. METHODS: In a retrospective consecutive clinical study with historical controls, 68 patients were discharged from our center with functioning grafts between September 1995 and December 1997. Patients received steroid-free immunosuppression using an initial 10-day antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance therapy with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). No steroids were given. RESULTS: After an observation for up to 2.5 years (median 488 days, range 127 to 945 days), 66 patients (one died from sepsis after 6 months, and one died of peritonitis after returning to dialysis) were alive and well. Sixty-four grafts were functioning well, hemolytic uremic syndrome recurred in one graft, one graft had to be removed for noncompliance, and two patients returned to dialysis after chronic rejection-one after 8 months (the patient who died in peritoneal dialysis) and one (a third graft in an antibody-positive patient) 16 months after transplantation. We observed only 10 acute rejections (15%), a rate significantly lower (P=0.0006) than the 71 acute rejections observed in 190 previous consecutive transplants (37.4%) treated without MMF but otherwise after exactly the same protocol. In further comparison, the MMF-treated group also showed an equivalent (P=NS) rate of cytomegalovirus infections and a lower rate (P<0.00005) of Epstein-Barr virus infections. Graft function was excellent (median serum creatinine below 200 micromol/L at 1 year), and no malignancies were observed in the MMF-treated patients. Side effects were mainly leukopenia and two gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Our first-line, steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol allows initial graft function, provides a safe level of long-term graft survival and function with a very low rejection rate, gives an acceptable rate of side effects, and possesses the potential for lowering the incidence of chronic rejection over the long-term. Compared with protocols that discontinue steroids after the initial posttransplant period, a steroid-free protocol avoids the increased risk of infection and body disfigurement in the early posttransplant period. It also avoids the long-term risks of steroid use and the increased risks of rejection when the steroids are withdrawn.     

The Nordic multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid in liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been reported to reduce the incidence of acute rejection after liver transplantation compared with historical controls. We investigated this in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. METHODS: Fifty-four liver transplant patients were allocated to the UDCA treatment group (15 mg/kg/day), and 48 patients were allocated to the placebo group. Trial medicine was started on the first postoperative day and was given for 3 months. Follow-up was for 12 months. Treatment was stratified for adults with chronic liver disease (n=77), adults with acute liver failure (n=10), and children (n=15). RESULTS: The frequency of patients with acute rejection was 65% in the UDCA treatment group and 68% in the placebo group. The frequency of steroid-resistant rejection was similar in both groups. The probability of acute rejection, analyzed according to the intention-to-treat policy with Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found in patient survival and graft survival probabilities. For the biochemical markers of cholestasis, only gamma-glutamyltransferase was significantly improved after 2 months of UDCA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The initial optimistic report of a beneficial effect of prophylactic treatment with UDCA on acute rejection after liver transplantation was not confirmed in this controlled study.     

The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) implications for the pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Tacrolimus has already gained a high reputation as an induction-maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Recently, it is being used as rescue therapy against rejection, and its effectiveness also appears to have been established to some extent. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of Tacrolimus rescue therapy at 4 institutions in the Kinki District. The subjects were 19 patients treated with Tacrolimus against rejection observed during immunosuppressive therapy using cyclosporin. Evaluation was made by classifying the patients into 6 with acute rejection that occurred within 3 months after transplantation (AR), 4 with late onset acute rejection that developed more than 3 months after operation (LAR), and 9 patients with chronic rejection (CR). In the AR group, many patients received combination therapy at the introduction of Tacrolimus, and the long-term outcome was satisfactory. Tacrolimus was effective in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients in the LAR group. The trough levels of Tacrolimus at its introduction were 10-15 ng/ml in the AR and LAR groups. Deterioration of the transplanted kidney function was prevented in 3 (50%) out of 6 patients in the CR group observed for less than 1 year, but it deteriorated in all 3 patients observed for 1 year or longer. The trough levels of tacrolimus at its introduction were 5-10 ng/ml in many patients in the CR group. The rescue therapy using Tacrolimus was effective against acute rejection but further follow-up is considered to be needed to evaluate its efficacy against chronic rejection.     

Routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy: late rejection after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Transplant programs use routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (RSEMB), which are performed at preset intervals to diagnose cardiac rejection. This retrospective study determined the incidence of graft rejection detected by RSEMB. METHODS: The records of 95 patients who underwent heart transplantation between 1987 and 1995 were reviewed. Rejection incidence was recorded for 80 patients who survived at least 30 days, with a mean follow-up of 35 months. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred sixteen total biopsies were performed; 1,170 were RSEMB. Four hundred seventy-five total rejection episodes occurred and 269 (56%) were diagnosed by RSEMB. Two distinct patient groups were identified. The majority (70 patients), had a decline in the incidence of rejection and no rejection episodes were identified by RSEMB after 36 months. In contrast, the high rejection group (10 patients) had a significantly higher ongoing rejection rate (p < or = 0.04 to p < or = 0.001) throughout their postoperative course up to 72 months. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our transplant patients demonstrate a decrease in rejection with time and do not require RSEMB beyond 30 months. We identified a group of patients who exhibited a higher rate of rejection and need continued RSEMB.     

Effect of IciA protein on the expression of the nrd gene encoding ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase in E. coli

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study investigated the efficacy of postoperative ticlopidine as antiplatelet therapy in patients shortly after heart valve repair or replacement. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1995, 235 consecutive patients underwent either valve repair (n = 67) or replacement with a bioprosthesis (n = 168). The bioprostheses used were Carpentier-Edwards porcine or pericardial (n = 158) valves, Prima stentless valves (n = 3) and cryopreserved homografts (n = 7). Types of repair were aortic (one), mitral annuloplasty with Carpentier ring (65) and tricuspid repair (one). Mean patient age was 67 (range: 16 to 83) years for valve replacement and 57 (range: 32 to 74) years for repair (p < 0.01). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 34% of patients. The hospital mortality rate was 11% (26 patients). Of the 209 survivors, 137 were assigned to antiplatelet treatment with ticlopidine for the first three months of follow up. The other 72 received either oral anticoagulation (coumadin; n = 40), aspirin (n = 14) or no medication (n = 18). In 15 patients, ticlopidine treatment was interrupted due to diarrhea (13 cases), mild allergic reaction (one) or anemia (one). The mean follow up was 3.2 years (range: 1 month to 6 years); cumulative follow up was 684 patient-years (pt-yr) and was complete in 96% of cases. RESULTS: There were two episodes of thromboembolism in the ticlopidine group at 1 month and 6 months respectively, with a linearized incidence of 0.5% pt-yr. In the coumadin group there were four episodes of thromboembolism, three within the first three months of follow up. The linearized incidence was 3% pt-yr (p < 0.01). There were three episodes of hemorrhage in the ticlopidine group in the first three months of follow up and one in the coumadin group. The linearized incidence was 0.75% pt-yr. CONCLUSIONS: Following heart valve repair or replacement with a bioprosthesis, the first three months is a high-risk period for thromboembolism. Ticlopidine seems to prevent this complication better than conventional therapy with oral anticoagulants. Nevertheless, hemorrhage continues to be a problem with ticlopidine therapy.     

Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in Cape Town--a clinical and histopathological study

BACKGROUND: The effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (rapamycin, RAPA) mono- and combination-therapy was examined in prevention of acute heart, pancreas, and kidney allograft rejection and in reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat. METHODS: Both drugs were administered orally for up to 30 days. Eleven groups (n=6) were involved in the first part of the heart allografting model. Brown Norway (RT1n) to Lewis (RT1(1)) combination was used in the heart and pancreas transplantation models, whereas Buffalo (RT1b) to Wistar Furth (RT1u) was used in the kidney transplantation model. RESULTS: The naive control group showed a mean survival time of 6.5+/-0.6 days. There were graded dose-responses to monotherapy of MMF 10 and 20 mg(kg/ day (12.5+/-2.6 days; 19.3+/-9.0 days) and RAPA 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.8 mg/kg/day (19.2+/-2.0 days; 30.0+/-7.3 days; 50.8+/-12.5 days; 51.2+/-2.6 days), respectively (P=0.001). Results with the combined use of drugs indicate that a synergistic or very strong synergistic interaction was produced when compared with monotherapy of MMF or RAPA: MMF 10 mg(kg/day+RAPA 0.2 mg/kg(day (52.7+/-5.7 days, combination index [CI] =0.189), MMF 20 mg(kg/day+RAPA 0.2 mg/kg/day (57.7+/-5.7 days, CI=0.084), MMF 10 mg/kg/day+RAPA 0.4 mg(kg/day (50.2+/-13.5 days, CI=0.453), and MMF 20 mg/kg(day+ RAPA 0.4 mg/kg(day (51.5+/-6.8 days, CI=0.439), respectively. These results were repeatable in the prevention of acute pancreas and kidney allograft rejection in the rat. In the second part of the study of reversal of ongoing acute heart allograft rejection model, the combined treatment of MMF 10 mg/kg(day+RAPA 0.2 mg/ kg(day (35.5+/-16.0 days, CI=0.794) and MMF 20 mg/kg day+RAPA 0.2 mg(kg/day (57.2+/-4.7 days, CI=0.310) represented synergistic interaction compared with monotherapy of MMF or RAPA. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant therapy of MMF and RAPA produces a synergistic effect in prevention of heart, pancreas, and kidney allograft rejection and in reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat.     

Management conditions during dialysis therapy influence the occurrence of complications after renal transplantation?

We investigated whether the management condition of patients during dialysis therapy has an influence on the occurrence of complications after renal transplantation. Thirty-one patients who underwent renal transplantation were investigated: thirteen received kidneys from living related donors and 18 received cadaveric transplants. The relations between weight gain ratio, cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and blood pressure during dialysis and the rate of episodes of acute rejection or infection after renal transplantation were analyzed. The rate of acute rejection tended to be higher among patients whose CTR was less than 45% than in those whose CTR was 45% or more. There was no relation found between the rate of infection after transplantation and weight gain ratio. CTR, or blood pressure during dialysis therapy. These results suggest the possibility that the management condition of patients during dialysis therapy influences the rate of acute rejection after these patients undergo renal transplantation.     

Glutathione depletion in epithelial lining fluid of lung allograft patients

The lower respiratory tract is protected against reactive oxygen species (ROS) by a complex antioxidant system. In the epithelial lining fluid (ELF), glutathione (L-alpha-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine, GSH) is essential for adequate protection of pneumocytes from potential toxicity mediated by extracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). We assessed the concentration of total GSH in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in lung allograft patients in the absence and presence of acute rejection. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsies were performed concurrently on 36 occasions in 17 patients who had undergone lung transplantation. BALF samples were divided into two groups on the basis of presence or absence of acute lung rejection on transbronchial biopsy. Seven BALF samples were obtained from control subjects for comparison. The BALF data demonstrated significantly lymphocyte recruitment and evidence of lung injury during acute rejection episodes. Transplant allografts without rejection showed significant depletion of total GSH in the ELF as compared with that of normal volunteers (94.0 +/- 9.7 microM versus 302.6 +/- 40.8 microM, p < 0.01). Transplant allografts with acute rejection had a slightly higher GSH concentration in their ELF (179.8 +/- 34.7), but this was still lower than control values. The deficiency of total GSH in the alveolar fluid may predispose lung allografts to extracellular H2O2-mediated toxicity.     

Acute, life-threatening complications of lung transplantation

Acute, life-threatening complications of lung transplantation are common in all reported series. The clinical courses and images of 70 patients who underwent heart-lung (n = 5), bilateral sequential lung (n = 31), or single-lung (n = 38) transplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five acute, life-threatening complications occurred in 26 patients (37%) within 3 months after transplantation. Nine deaths occurred as a result of these complications for a mortality rate due to acute complications of 13%. The deaths were a result of bleeding (n = 4), sepsis (n = 2), severe acute rejection and adult respiratory distress syndrome (n = 1), multiorgan failure (n = 1), and diffuse alveolar damage and respiratory failure (n = 1), a distribution of causes similar to those in other reported series. Specific diagnoses that can be made with imaging include hemothorax, lung torsion, pneumomediastinum, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, lung collapse, paralysis of the diaphragm, and sternal dehiscence.     

Prospective study of the value of transbronchial lung biopsy after lung transplantation

Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBB) has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia in lung transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the value of regular surveillance TBB in stable asymptomatic patients and to establish the role of TBB as a follow-up procedure 1 month after a previous pathological biopsy result. We prospectively evaluated 76 TBBs performed in 17 lung transplant recipients. A definite pathological results was found in 14 of 15 TBBs performed for clinical indications: CMV pneumonia (5), acute rejection grade > or = A2 according to the criteria of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) (4), bronchiolitis obliterans (3), and desquamative interstitial pneumonitis (2). Fifteen of 45 surveillance TBBs performed in asymptomatic patients revealed significant abnormalities. Ten episodes of acute rejection ISHLT grade > or = A2 and three episodes of CMV pneumonia detected by TBB had direct therapeutic consequences. Nine of 16 follow-up TBBs performed 1 month after a pathological biopsy result again showed relevant pathological findings. With the exception of one severe haemorrhage, no life-threatening complications occurred. Our results suggest that transbronchial lung biopsies performed on a regular basis after lung transplantation are important for the detection of asymptomatic and/or persistent acute rejection or injection. In the long-term, this strategy might be the most effective tool in reducing the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans, which is still the main obstacle for further improvement of long-term survival after lung transplantation.