Effect of copolymer composition on the miscibility of blends of styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers with poly (methyl methacrylate)

The phase behaviour for blends of various polymethacrylates with styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers has been examined as a function of the acrylonitrile content of the copolymer. Poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate) and poly(n-propyl methacrylate) were found to be miscible with SANs over a limited window of acrylonitrile contents while no SANs appear to be miscible with poly(isopropyl methacrylate) or poly(n-butyl methacrylate). These conclusions were reached on the basis of lower critical solution temperature (LCST) and glass transition temperature behaviour. All miscible blends exhibited phase separation on heating, LCST behaviour, at temperatures which varied greatly with copolymer composition. An optimum acrylonitrile (AN) level ranging from about 10 to 14% by weight resulted in the highest temperatures for phase separation which has important implications for selection of SANs to produce homogeneous mixtures by melt processing. The basis for miscibility in these systems is evidently repulsion between styrene and acrylonitrile units in the copolymer as explained by recent models. The excess volumes for all blends are zero within experimental accuracy which suggests that the interactions for miscibility are relatively weak even for the optimum AN level. This interaction becomes smaller the larger or more bulky is the alkyl side group of the polymethacrylate.     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Decreasing miscibility with greater heterogeneity in ternary polymer blend: poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate), poly(α‐methyl styrene) and poly(4‐methyl styrene)

A ternary blend system comprising poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate) (PCHMA), poly(α‐methyl styrene) (PαMS) and poly(4‐methyl styrene) (P4MS) was investigated by thermal analysis, optical and scanning electron microscopy. Ternary phase behaviour was compared with the behaviour for the three constituent binary pairs. This study showed that the ternary blends of PCHMA/PαMS/P4MS in most compositions were miscible, with an apparent glass transition temperature (T_g) and distinct cloud‐point transitions, which were located at lower temperatures than their binary counterparts. However, in a closed‐loop range of compositions roughly near the centre of the triangular phase diagram, some ternary blends displayed phase separation with heterogeneity domains of about 1 µm. Therefore, it is properly concluded that ternary PCHMA/PαMS/P4M is partially miscible with a small closed‐loop immisciblity range, even though all the constituent binary pairs are fully miscible. Thermodynamic backgrounds leading to decreased miscibility and greater heterogeneity in a ternary polymer system in comparison with the binary counterparts are discussed. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Kinetics of phase separation of poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

The phase behavior and kinetics of phase separation for blends of the random copolymer poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) (SMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were studied by using small‐angle laser light scattering. The partially miscible SMMA/SAN blends undergo spinodal decomposition (SD) and subsequent domain coarsening when quenched inside the unstable region. For blends of SMMA and SAN, the early stages of the phase separation process could be observed, unlike a number of other blends where the earliest stages are not visible by light scattering. The process was described in terms of the Cahn–Hilliard linear theory. Subsequently, a coarsening process was detected and the time evolution of q_m at the beginning of the late stages of phase separation followed the relationship q_m∝t^?1/3, corresponding to an evaporation–condensation mechanism. Self‐similar growth of the phase‐separated structures at different timescales was observed for the late stage. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Changes in the interfacial properties of PC/SAN blends with compatibilizer

Block copolymers of polycarbonate‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PC‐b‐PMMA) and tetramethyl poly(carbonate)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (TMPC‐b‐PMMA) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fiber retraction (IFR) technique and an asymmetric double cantilever beam fracture test. The average diameter of dispersed particles and interfacial tension of the PC/SAN blends were reduced by adding compatibilizer to the PC/SAN blends. Fracture toughness of the blends was also improved by enhancing interfacial adhesion with compatibilizer. TMPC‐b‐PMMA copolymer was more effective than PC‐b‐PMMA copolymer as a compatibilizer for the PC/SAN blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2649–2656, 2003     

The toughness and morphology of (chlorinated poly[vinyl chloride])/(methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene) blends

A series of methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene (MBS) graft copolymers were synthesized via seeded emulsion polymerization techniques by grafting styrene and methyl methacrylate on poly(butadiene‐co‐styrene) (SBR) particles. The chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) (CPVC)/MBS blends were obtained by melting MBS graft copolymers with CPVC resin, and the effect of the core/shell ratio of MBS graft copolymer and SBR content of CPVC/MBS blends on the mechanical properties and morphology of CPVC/MBS blends was studied. The results showed that, with the increase in the core/shell ratio, the impact strength of the blend increased and then decreased. It was found that, when the core/shell ratio was 50/50, the impact strength was about 155 J/m, and the tensile strength evidently increased. The toughness of the CPVC/MBS blend was closely related to the SBR content of the blend, and with the increasing of SBR content of blend, the impact strength of the blend increased. The morphology of CPVC/MBS blends was observed via scanning electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that the toughness of CPVC/MBS blend was consistence with the dispersion of MBS graft copolymers in the CPVC matrix. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:501–505, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Synthesis and property behavior of dioctyl phthalate plasticized styrene–acrylate particles by Shirasu porous glass emulsification and subsequent suspension copolymerization

Two‐phase model styrene–acrylate copolymers were synthesized with a soft phase consisting of methyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and butyl methacrylate. Besides the styrenic copolymers, copolymers containing a hard phase of methyl methacylate and methyl acrylate were also synthesized. Comonomer droplets with a narrow size distribution and fair uniformity were prepared using an SPG (Shirasu porous glass) membrane having pore size of 0.90 μm. After the single‐step SPG emulsion, the emulsion droplets were composed mainly of monomers, hydrophobic additives, and an oil‐soluble initiator, suspended in the aqueous phase containing a stabilizer and inhibitor. These were then transferred to a reactor, and subsequent suspension polymerization was carried out. Uniform copolymer particles with a mean diameter ranging from 3 to 7 μm, depending on the recipe, with a narrow particle size distribution and a coefficient of variation of about 10% were achieved. Based on the glass‐transition temperatures, as measured by differential scanning calorimetry, the resulting copolymer particles containing a soft phase of acrylate were better compatibilized with a hard phase of methyl methacrylate than with styrene with dioctyl phthalate (DOP) addition. Glass‐transition temperatures of poly(MMA‐co‐MA) particles were strongly affected by the composition drift in the copolymer caused by their substantial difference in reactivity ratios. Incorporation of DOP in the copolymer particles does not significantly affect the glass‐transition temperature of MMA‐ or MA‐containing copolymer particles, but it does affect the St‐containing copolymer and particle morphology of the copolymers. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3037–3050, 2003     

The influence of the internal structure of core–shell particles on poly(vinyl chloride)/(methyl methacrylate–butadiene–styrene) blends

Methyl methacrylate–butadiene–styrene (MBS) core–shell particles were prepared by grafting styrene and methyl methacrylate onto polybutadiene seeds via emulsion polymerization. All the MBS particles were designed with the same chemical composition, similar grafting degree but different internal structures. The difference in internal structure was realized by controlling the ratio of ‘external grafting’ and ‘internal grafting’ of styrene. The work focused on the influence of the internal structure of MBS core–shell particles on the properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/MBS blends. From transmission electron microscopy, three different internal structures were observed: rare sub‐inclusions, a large number of small sub‐inclusions and large sub‐inclusions. The results of dynamic mechanical analysis illustrated that the different internal structures greatly affected the glass transition temperature T_g of the rubber phase and the storage modulus of the core–shell particles. The notched Izod impact test results showed that the MBS with large sub‐inclusions had the lowest brittle–ductile transition temperature, while the transparency test revealed that the presence of sub‐inclusions in the rubbery phase reduced the transparency of the blend. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Dependence of morphological changes of polymer particles on hydrophobic/hydrophilic additives

Fairly uniform microspheres of poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) were prepared by employing a microporous glass membrane [Shirasu porous glass (SPG)]. The single‐step SPG emulsification, the emulsion composed mainly of monomers, hydrophobic additives, and an oil‐soluble initiator, suspended in the aqueous phase containing a stabilizer and inhibitor, was then transferred to a reactor, and subsequent suspension polymerization followed. The droplets obtained were polymerized at 75°C under a nitrogen atmosphere for 24 h. The uniform poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) microspheres with diameters ranging from 7 to 14 μm and a narrow particle‐size distribution with a coefficient of variation close to 10% were prepared by using SPG membrane with a pore size of 1.42 μm. The effects of the crosslinking agent and hydrophobic additives on the particle size, particle‐size distribution, and morphologies were investigated. It was found that the particle size decreased with a narrower size distribution when the additives were changed from long‐chain alkanes to long‐chain alcohols and long‐chain esters, respectively. Various microspheres with different morphologies were obtained, depending on the composition of the oil phase. The spherical poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) particles without phase separation were obtained when using an adequate amount of the crosslinking agent and methyl palmitate as an additive. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1013–1028, 2000     

Effect of in situ polymerization conditions of methyl methacrylate on the structural and morphological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(acrylonitrile‐g‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene)‐g‐styrene) PMMA/AES Blends

In this study, the structural and morphological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(acrylonitrile‐g‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene‐co‐diene‐g‐styrene) (PMMA‐AES) blends were investigated with emphasis on the influence of the in situ polymerization conditions of methyl methacrylate. PMMA‐AES blends were obtained by in situ polymerization, varying the solvent (chloroform or toluene) and polymerization conditions: method A—no stirring and air atmosphere; method B—stirring and N₂ atmosphere. The blends were characterized by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The results showed that the PMMA‐AES blends are immiscible and present complex morphologies. This morphology shows an elastomeric dispersed phase in a glassy matrix, with inclusion of the matrix in the elastomer domains, suggesting core shell or salami morphology. The occlusion of the glassy phase within the elastomeric domains can be due to the formation of graft copolymer and/or phase inversion during polymerization. However, this morphology is affected by the polymerization conditions (stirring and air or N₂ atmosphere) and by the solvent used. The selective extraction of the blends' components and infrared spectroscopy showed that crosslinked and/or grafting reactions occur on the elastomer chains during MMA polymerization. The glass transition of the elastomer phase is influenced by morphology, crosslinking, and grafting degree and, therefore, T_g depends on the polymerization conditions. On the other hand, the behavior of T_g of the glassy phase with blend composition suggests miscibility or partial miscibility for the SAN phase of AES and PMMA. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile and methyl methacrylate monomer mixtures on crumb natural rubber

Graft copolymerization of mixtures of acrylonitrile and methyl methacylate on crumb natural rubber was carried out in toluene at 60°C. The nitrogen content of the grafted copolymer was determined by elemental analysis and used to estimate the composition of the copolymer samples. It was found that the amount of acrylonitrile monomeric units incorporated into the polymer was disproportionately lower than the acylonitrile content of the feed and explanations in terms of the e‐value of the monomers and the inherent heterogenous nature of the polymerization mixture were offered. The miscibility of the natural rubber‐g‐polyacrylonitrile‐co‐poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl chloride) was studied by viscometry, differential scanning calorimetry, and phase contrast microscopy. It was found that the natural rubber‐g‐polyacrylonitrile‐co‐poly(methyl methacrylate) formed semimiscible blends with poly(vinyl chloride). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 1872–1877, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10474     

Miscibility of DMPC‐TMPC copolycarbonate/SMMA copolymer blends and their interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blends

The isothermal miscibility map and phase‐separation temperatures caused by lower critical solution temperature‐type phase behavior for blends of poly[2,2,‐propane‐bis{4‐(2‐methyl phenyl)} carbonate]‐poly[2,2,‐propane‐bis{4‐(2,6‐dimethyl phenyl)} carbonate] (DMPC‐TMPC) with poly[(styrene)‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] (SMMA) copolymers have been determined. SMMA copolymers containing equal to or less than 37 wt% MMA formed miscible blends with DMPC‐TMPC copolycarbonates containing equal to or more than 60 wt% TMPC. The observed phase‐separation temperatures indicate that the miscibility decreases as the DMPC content in DMPC‐TMPC increases, while addition of MMA to the styrene initially increases miscibility with DMPC‐TMPC but ultimately leads to immiscibility. The binary interaction energies involved in these blends were calculated from the phase boundaries using the lattice‐fluid theory combined with the binary interaction model. The spinodal temperatures predicted from the lattice‐fluid theory using the calculated interaction energies are similar to the experimental phase‐separation temperatures. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology of nylon 6/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends compatibilized by a methyl methacrylate/maleic anhydride copolymer

The morphologies of nylon 6/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends compatibilized with a methyl methacrylate/maleic anhydride copolymer, with 3–20 wt % maleic anhydride, were examined by transmission electron microscopy. Some staining techniques were employed for identifying the various phases. The binary blends were immiscible and exhibited poor mechanical properties that stemmed from the unfavorable interactions among their molecular segments. This produced an unstable and coarse phase morphology and weak interfaces among the phases in the solid state. The presence of the copolymer in the blends clearly led to a more efficient dispersion of the acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene phase and consequently optimized Izod impact properties. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3512–3518, 2003     

Nanostructured polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐polybutadiene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers modified with polystyrene and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymers

Morphologies of polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐ polybutadiene‐b ‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) triblock copolymer were predicted, adopting the phase diagram proposed by Stadler and co‐workers for neat SBM block copolymer, and were experimentally proved using atomic force microscopy. All investigated polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymer modified with polystyrene (PS) and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) homopolymers showed the expected nanostructures. For polymer blends of symmetric SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with PS homopolymer, the cylinders in cylinders core?shell morphology and the perforated lamellae morphology were obtained. Moreover, modifying the same SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with both PS and PMMA homopolymers the cylinders at cylinders morphology was reached. The predictions for morphologies of blends based on asymmetric SBM‐2 triblock copolymer were also confirmed experimentally, visualizing a spheres over spheres structure. This work presents an easy way of using PS and/or PMMA homopolymers for preparing nanostructured polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymers with desired morphologies, similar to those of neat SBM block copolymers. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effects of poly(methyl methacrylate)‐based low‐profile additives on the properties of cured unsaturated polyester resins. I. Miscibility,curing behavior,and glass‐transition temperatures

The effects of three series of self‐synthesized poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)‐based low‐profile additives (LPAs), including PMMA, poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐butyl acrylate), and poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐butyl acrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride), with different chemical structures and MWs on the miscibility, cured‐sample morphology, curing kinetics, and glass‐transition temperatures for styrene (ST)/unsaturated polyester (UP) resin/LPA ternary systems were investigated by group contribution methods, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical analysis, respectively. Before curing at room temperature, the degree of phase separation for the ST/UP/LPA systems was generally explainable by the calculated polarity difference per unit volume between the UP resin and LPA. During curing at 110°C, the compatibility of the ST/UP/LPA systems, as revealed by cured‐sample morphology, was judged from the relative magnitude of the DSC peak reaction rate and the broadness of the peak. On the basis of Takayanagi's mechanical models, the effects of LPA on the final cure conversion and the glass‐transition temperature in the major continuous phase of ST‐crosslinked polyester for the ST/UP/LPA systems was also examined. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3369–3387, 2004     

Enhancing electrical properties of MWCNTs in immiscible blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer by selective localization

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were introduced into poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) blends by melt mixing in an asymmetric miniature mixer (APAM). A composition of 70 wt% of PMMA and 30 wt% of SAN was mixed to create a co‐continuous morphology. Transmission electron microscopy images of ultra‐microtomed samples (70 nm in thickness) showed selective localization of MWCNTs inside the percolated SAN phase. The occurrence of the double percolation phenomenon resulted in lower electrical percolation thresholds of PMMA/SAN/MWCNT blends molded at high temperatures. Dielectric spectroscopy indicated a higher electrical permittivity for samples that were compression molded at 260°C. Due to the higher affinity of MWCNTs to SAN, there was a migration of MWCNTs into the SAN phase during the melt processing. Conductivity measurements revealed a significant decrease in electrical percolation threshold (0.4 wt%) for PMMA70/SAN30 blends compared with MWCNT‐filled SAN and MWCNT‐filled PMMA (ca. 0.8 wt%). POLYM. COMPOS., 37:1523–1530, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphologies of polybutylacrylate/poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) latex prepared by starved emulsion polymerization Part I. Thermodynamics equilibrium morphology

Heterogeneous latexes were prepared by a semicontinuous seeded emulsion polymerization process under monomer starved conditions at 80 °C using potassium persulfate as the initiator and sodium dodecyl sulfate as the emulsifier. Poly(butyl acrylate) latexes were used as seeds. The second‐stage polymer was poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate). By varying the amounts of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in the second‐stage copolymer, the polarity of the copolymer phase could be controlled. Phase separation towards the thermodynamic equilibrium morphology was accelerated either by ageing the composite latex at 80 °C or by adding a chain‐transfer agent during polymerization. The morphologies of the latex particles were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The morphology distributions of latex particles were described by a statistical method. It was found that the latex particles displayed different equilibrium morphologies depending on the composition of the second‐stage copolymers. This series of equilibrium morphologies of [poly(butyl acrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate)] (PBA/P(St‐co‐MMA)) system provides experimental verification for quantitative simulation. Under limiting conditions, the equilibrium morphologies of PBA/P(St‐co‐MMA) were predicted according to the minimum surface free energy change principle. The particle morphology observed by TEM was in good agreement with the predictions of the thermodynamic model. Therefore, the morphology theory for homopolymer/homopolymer composite systems was extended to homopolymer/copolymer systems. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of compatibilizer on the morphological,mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(N‐methyl methacrylimide) blends

The effects of compatibilizer on the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(N‐methyl methacrylimide) (PMMI) (70/30) blends were investigated. The compatibilizer used in this study was styrene–acrylonitrile–glycidyl methacrylate (SAN‐GMA) copolymer. Morphological characterization of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend with SAN‐GMA showed a decrease in PMMI droplet size with an increase in SAN‐GMA. The glass‐transition temperature of the PMMA‐rich phase became higher when SAN‐GMA was added up to 5 parts per hundred resin by weight (phr). The flexural and tensile strengths of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend increased with the addition of SAN‐GMA up to 5 phr. The complex viscosity of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blends increased when SAN‐GMA was added up to 5 phr, which implies an increase in compatibility between the PMMA and PMMI components. From the weighted relaxation spectrum, which was obtained from the storage modulus and loss modulus, the interfacial tension of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend was calculated using the Palierne emulsion model and the Choi‐Schowalter model. The results of the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological studies and the values of the interfacial tension of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blends suggest that the optimum compatibilizer concentration of SAN‐GMA is 5 phr. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43856.     

One‐pot synthesized poly(vinyl pyrrolidone‐co‐methyl methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid) blended with poly(ether sulfone) to prepare blood‐compatible membranes

In this study, a random copolymer of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone‐co‐methyl methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid) was synthesized via a one‐pot reaction with the reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer method and was then blended with poly(ether sulfone) (PES) to prepare flat‐sheet membranes that were expected to have anticoagulant and antifouling properties. The synthesized copolymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and NMR spectroscopy. The molecular weights and molecular weight distributions were determined by gel permeation chromatography. Elemental analysis was used to calculate the molar ratios of vinyl pyrrolidone (VP), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and acrylic acid (AA) in the copolymer. A liquid–liquid phase‐inversion technique was used to prepare the copolymer‐blended PES membranes. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and attenuated total reflectance–FTIR spectroscopy were used to investigate the copolymer on the membrane surfaces. Compared with the pristine PES membrane, the modified PES membranes showed improved hydrophilicity, low hemolysis ratios, decreased protein adsorption, and suppressed platelet adhesion. Furthermore, the thrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time indicated that the blood compatibility of the modified PES membranes were improved. The results of the 3‐(4,5‐Dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the cell morphology suggested that the cytocompatibility increased. In addition, the modified membranes showed good protein antifouling properties. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 4284–4298, 2013