Melt rheology of compatibilized polystyrene/low density polyethylene blends

Investigations have been made on the melt rheological behaviors of compatibilized blends composed of polystyrene, low density polyethylene and hydrogenated (styrene‐butadiene‐styrene) triblock copolymer used as a compatibilizer. The experiments were carried out on a capillary rheometer. The effects of shear stress, temperature and blending ratio on the activation energy for viscous flow and melt viscosity of the blends are described. The study shows that the viscosity of the blends exhibits a maximum or minimum value at a certain blending ratio. The activation energy for viscous flow decreases with increasing LDPE content. Furthermore, the concept of equal‐viscosity temperature is presented and its role in the processing of the blend is discussed. In addition, the morphology of the extrudate sample of the blends was observed by scanning electron microscopy and the correlation between the morphology and the rheological properties is explored. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Melt strength of linear low‐density polyethylene/low‐density polyethylene blends

Linear low‐density polyethylenes and low‐density polyethylenes of various compositions were melt‐blended with a batch mixer. The blends were characterized by their melt strengths and other rheological properties. A simple method for measuring melt strength is presented. The melt strength of a blend may vary according to the additive rule or deviate from the additive rule by showing a synergistic or antagonistic effect. This article reports our investigation of the parameters controlling variations of the melt strength of a blend. The reciprocal of the melt strength of a blend correlates well with the reciprocal of the zero‐shear viscosity and the reciprocal of the relaxation time of the melt. An empirical equation relating the maximum increment (or decrement) of the melt strength to the melt indices of the blend components is proposed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 1408–1418, 2002     

Rheological properties and morphology of compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene alloy

The rheological behavior of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends [where PBT is poly(butylene terephthalate), LLDPE is linear low‐density polyethylene, and AA is acrylic acid] under a capillary flow was investigated with a capillary rheometer. The Utracki equation was used to describe the viscosity–composition dependence of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends at low shear stresses. However, at high shear stresses, this equation was not suitable for these blending systems. There existed a maximum on the curves of the entrance pressure drop versus the blending compositions, and the interlayer slip factor β in the Utracki equation was related not only to the shear stress but also to the elasticity difference of the two blending components. Morphological observations indicated that at high shear rates, there existed two different morphologies at different positions of the extrudates, and this was the reason that the Utracki equation failed. Near the wall of the capillary, low‐viscosity PBT stratified, and this resulted in an additional decrease in the viscosities of the blending systems. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 206–213, 2003     

Study of morphology influence on rheological properties of compatibilized TPU/SAN blends

The compatibilizing efficiency of three different compatibilizers on the thermoplastic polyurethane/styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (TPU/SAN) blends properties was investigated after compatibilizer's incorporation via melt‐mixing. The compatibilizers studied were as follows: poly‐ε‐caprolactone (PCL) of different molecular weight (M_w), a mixture of polystyrene‐block‐polycaprolactone (PS‐b‐PCL) and polystyrene‐block‐poly (methyl methacrylate) (PS‐b‐PMMA), and a mixture of polyisoprene‐block‐polycaprolactone (PI‐b‐PCL) and polybutadiene‐block‐poly (methyl methacrylate) (PB‐b‐PMMA). In our study, the effect of 5 wt % added compatibilizers on TPU/SAN blends morphology was examined. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to study the morphology at different length scales and to determine the compatibilizer's location. Investigations showed the different improvement of properties, because of the different incorporation of compatibilizers in the polymer blend. The morphology influence on the rheological behavior of compatibilized blends was investigated with a stress‐controlled rheometer (Rheometric Dynamic Stress Rheometer, SR‐500). Different compatibilization activity was found for different system. It was also found that compatibilization activity of added compatibilizer strongly depends on the comaptibilizer's M_w. Blends compatibilized with PCL showed superior properties as compared with the other examined blends. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2303–2316, 2006     

Morphology and rheological properties of compatibilized low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch blends

Morphology and rheological properties of low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch (LDPE/LLDPE/TPS) blends are experimentally investigated and theoretically analyzed using rheological models. Blending of LDPE/LLDPE (70/30 wt/wt) with 5–20 wt % of TPS and 3 wt % of PE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) as a compatibilizer is performed in a twin‐screw extruder. Scanning electron micrographs show a fairly good dispersion of TPS in PE matrices in the presence of PE‐g‐MA. However, as the TPS content increases, the starch particle size increases. X‐ray diffraction patterns exhibit that with increase in TPS content, the intensity of the crystallization peaks slightly decreases and consequently crystal sizes of the blends decrease. The rheological analyses indicate that TPS can increase the elasticity and viscosity of the blends. With increasing the amount of TPS, starch particles interactions intensify and as a result the blend interface become weaker which are confirmed by relaxation time spectra and the prediction results of emulsion Palierne and Gramespacher‐Meissner models. It is demonstrated that there is a better agreement between experimental rheological data and Coran model than the emulsion models. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44719.     

Correlation between the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate/linear low‐density polyethylene blends: Effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization

The effects of the blend composition and compatibilization on the morphology of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends were studied. The blends showed dispersed/matrix and cocontinuous phase morphologies that depended on the composition. The blends had a cocontinuous morphology at an EVA concentration of 40–60%. The addition of the compatibilizer first decreased the domain size of the dispersed phase, which then leveled off. Two types of compatibilizers were added to the polymer/polymer interface: linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and LLDPE‐g phenolic resin. Noolandi's theory was in agreement with the experimental data. The conformation of the compatibilizer at the blend interface could be predicted by the calculation of the area occupied by the compatibilizer molecule at the interface. The effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were analyzed from ?60°C to +35°C. The experiments were performed over a series of frequencies. The area under the curve of the loss modulus versus the temperature was higher than the values obtained by group contribution analysis. The loss tangent curve showed a peak corresponding to the glass transition of EVA, indicating the incompatibility of the blend system. The damping characteristics of the blends increased with increasing EVA content because of the decrease in the crystalline volume of the system. Attempts were made to correlate the observed viscoelastic properties of the blends with the morphology. Various composite models were used to model the dynamic mechanical data. Compatibilization increased the storage modulus of the system because of the fine dispersion of EVA domains in the LLDPE matrix, which provided increased interfacial interaction. Better compatibilization was effected at a 0.5–1% loading of the compatibilizer. This was in full agreement with the dynamic mechanical spectroscopy data. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4526–4538, 2006     

An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP compatibilized blends: Rheological,morphological, and mechanical properties

The effectiveness of P(E‐co‐MA‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizer for recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP (polypropylene (ethylene‐propylene) heterophase copolymer) blends was investigated by means of morphological (scanning electron microscopy), rheological (small amplitude oscillatory shear), mechanical (tensile, flexural and impact tests), and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry) properties. Compatibilizer concentration ranged from 1 to 5 wt % with respect to the whole blend. All blends were obtained in a 90/10 composition using a twin screw extruder. Compatibilization effects for PETr/PP‐EP were more pronounced due to ethylene segments present in both PP‐EP and P(E‐co‐EA‐co‐GMA). PETr/PP‐EP has shown greater dispersed phase size reduction, a more solid‐like complex viscosity behavior and larger storage modulus at low frequencies in relation to PETr/PP blend. For both investigated blends, mechanical properties indicated an improvement in both elongation at break and impact strength with increasing compatibilizer content. PETr/PP‐EP blends showed improved performance for the same level of compatibilizer content. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41892.     

Rheological,thermal, and morphological properties of low‐density polyethylene/ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene and linear low‐density polyethylene/ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene blends

The dynamic rheological behavior of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE)/ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) blends and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/UHMWPE blends was measured in a parallel‐plate rheometer at 180, 190, and 200°C. Analysis of the log–additivity rule, Cole–Cole plots, Han curves, and Van Gurp curves of the LDPE/UHMWPE blends indicated that the blends were miscible in the melt. In contrast, the rheological properties of LLDPE/UHMWPE showed that the miscibility of the blends was decided by the composition of LLDPE. The differential scanning calorimetry results and scanning electron microscopy photos of the LLDPE/UHMWPE blends were consistent with the rheological properties, whereas with regard to the thermal and morphological properties of LDPE/UHMWPE blends, the results reveal three endothermic peaks and phase separation, which indicated a liquid–solid phase separation in the LDPE/UHMWPE blends. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Role of the interface in the melt‐rheology properties of linear low‐density polyethylene/low‐density polyethylene blends: Effect of the molecular architecture of the dispersed phase

We studied the melt linear viscoelastic and elongational properties of blends consisting of a Ziegler–Natta linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and different LDPEs. The weight fraction of the LDPE used in the blends was 15%. The linear viscoelastic characterization was performed at different temperatures for all of the blends to determine the thermorheological behavior in the melt state. The blends fulfilled the time–temperature superposition but exhibited a broad linear viscoelastic response, which was further than that expected for miscible blends and even immiscible systems with a sharp interface. A rheological study of the application of the Palierne model revealed that in addition to the droplet shape relaxation, another mechanism was present at lower frequencies. We discuss the results by hypothesizing a strong interaction between the high‐molecular‐weight linear fraction of the LLDPE matrix and a fraction of molecules of the dispersed phase, which formed a thick interface with its own viscoelastic properties. A clear change in this additional mechanism was observed, depending on the dispersed minor‐phase properties, which produced an impact on the processing of the blends, and more precisely, on the values of the melt strength in the melt‐spinning experiments. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effects of ultrasonic oscillations on processing behavior and mechanical properties of metallocene‐catalyzed linear low‐density polyethylene/low‐density polyethylene blends

The influences of ultrasonic oscillations on rheological behavior and mechanical properties of metallocene‐catalyzed linear low‐density polyethylene (mLLDPE)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) blends were investigated. The experimental results showed that the presence of ultrasonic oscillations can increase the extrusion productivity of mLLDPE/LDPE blends and decrease their die pressure and melt viscosity during extrusion. Incorporation of LDPE increases the critical shear rate for sharkskin formation of extrudate, crystallinity, and mechanical properties of mLLDPE. The processing behavior and mechanical properties of mLLDPE/LDPE blends were further improved in the presence of ultrasonic oscillations during extrusion. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 2522–2527, 2004     

Effect of the compatibility on dielectric performance and breakdown strength of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/low‐density polyethylene blends

Immiscible polymer blends with high dielectric constant (ε) and improved breakdown strength (E_b) performance were obtained by composing poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) or the LDPE grafted with maleic anhydride (LDPE‐g‐MAH) through melt‐blending way. The dielectric properties of these blends were emphasized for considering the compatibility effect on the energy storage application. Interface morphology, co‐continuity behavior, and grafted ratio were simultaneously investigated to detect the compatibility enhancement after introducing MAH. Results showed that the MAH positively improved the dielectric properties. Both the measured E_b of PVDF/LDPE and PVDF/LDPE‐g‐MAH blends showed a minimum value at v^PVDF = 50 vol % because of the worst compatibility; meanwhile, higher E_b of PVDF/LDPE‐g‐MAH than that of PVDF/LDPE blend was observed owing to the better compatibility. For considering the effect interface morphology on the dielectric performance, layer‐structure films composing with pure PVDF and LDPE layers were further constructed and studied. It was revealed that the layered structure could be treated as a helpful way to improve ε and E_b for immiscible polymer blends. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42507.     

Thermoplastic elastomers based on epoxidized natural rubber and high‐density polyethylene blends: Effect of blend compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties

Epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) with a level of epoxide groups of 20 mol % was prepared via the performic epoxidation method. It was then used to blend with high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) at various blend ratios. Three types of blend compatibilizers were prepared. These included a graft copolymer of HDPE and maleic anhydride (MA; i.e., HDPE‐g‐MA) and two types of phenolic modified HDPEs using phenolic resins SP‐1045 and HRJ‐10518 (i.e., PhSP‐PE and PhHRJ‐PE), respectively. We found that the blend with compatibilizer exhibited superior tensile strength, hardness, and set properties to that of the blend without compatibilizer. The ENR and HDPE interaction via the link of compatibilizer molecules was the polar functional groups of the compatibilizer with the oxirane groups in the ENR molecules. Also, another end of the compatibilizer molecules (i.e., HDPE segments) was compatibilizing with the HDPE molecules in the blend components. The blend with compatibilizer also showed smaller phase morphology than the blend without compatibilizer. Among the three types of the blend compatibilizer, HDPE‐g‐MA provided the blend with the greatest strength and hardness properties but the lowest set properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Melt rheological properties of PBT/SEBS and reactively compatibilized PBT/SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MA polymer blends

Melt rheological properties of PBT/SEBS and PBT/SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MA blends at SEBS volume fraction (Φ_d) = 0.00–0.38 were studied at 240°C, 250°C and 260°C using a capillary rheometer. The compatibilizer SEBS‐g‐MA addition resulted in significant reduction in the dynamic interfacial tension which in turn led to increased phase adhesion. The power law exponent n decreased with increasing Φ_d and increasing temperature for both the compatiblized and uncompatiblized blends. The consistency index of PBT/SEBS increased with increasing Φ_d but were smaller than those of PBT/SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MA blends. Melt elasticity such as die swell and first normal stress difference increased with Φ_d. Variations of first normal stress coefficient function (ψ₁), recoverable shear strain (γ_R), relaxation time (λ), and shear compliance (J_c) values versus shear rate were analyzed. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41402.     

Melt rheology and morphology of uncompatibilized and in situ compatibilized nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber blends

Melt rheology and morphology of nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) blends were studied as a function of composition, temperature, and compatibilizer loading. Uncompatibilized blends with higher nylon‐6 content (N90 and N95) and rubber content (N5 and N10) had viscosities approximately intermediate between those of the component polymers. A very clear negative deviation was observed in the viscosity–composition curve over the entire shear rate range studied for blends having composition N30, N50, and N70. This was associated with the interlayer slip resulting from the high‐level incompatibility between the component polymers. The lack of compatibility was confirmed by fracture surface morphology, given that the dispersed domains showed no sign of adhesion to the matrix. The phase morphology studies indicated that EPR was dispersed as spherical inclusions in the nylon matrix up to 30 wt % of its concentration. A cocontinuous morphology was observed between 30 and 50 wt % nylon and a phase inversion beyond 70 wt % nylon. Various models based on viscosity ratios were used to predict the region of phase inversion. Experiments were also carried out on in situ compatibilization using maleic anhydride–modified EPR (EPR‐g‐MA). In this reactive compatibilization strategy, the maleic anhydride groups of modified EPR reacted with the amino end groups of nylon. This reaction produced a graft copolymer at the blend interface, which in fact acted as the compatibilizer. The viscosity of the blend was found to increase when a few percent of modified EPR was added; at higher concentrations the viscosity leveled off, indicating a high level of interaction at the interface. Morphological investigations indicated that the size of the dispersed phase initially decreased when a few percent of the graft copolymer was added followed by a clear leveling off at higher concentration. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 252–264, 2004     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/low‐density polyethylene and poly(butylene terephthalate)/ethylene propylene diene rubber blends with a bismaleimide

The reactive compatibilization effect of a small molecule, bismaleimide (BMI), on poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and PBT/ethylene propylene diene (EPDM) rubber blends were investigated. All the blends were prepared by melt blending in the mixing chamber of a Haake Rheocord. The particle size of dispersed phase was reduced by >ten times by adding 1.2 wt % of BMI as observed with scanning electron microscopy. The torque‐time curve recorded during mixing showed that the addition of BMI leads to a significant increase in the viscosity of PBT, LDPE, EPDM, and the blends. This indicates that a chemical reaction has taken place. It was confirmed that free radicals are involved in the reactions because the addition of a stabilizer to the blends has removed all the compatibilizing effect, and the torque‐time curve does not show any increase in viscosity. A possible mechanism of compatibilization is proposed. The shear forces during melt mixing cause the rupture of chemical bond in the polymers, which form macroradicals of PBT, LDPE, or EPDM. These macroradicals react with BMI to form PBT‐BMI‐LDPE or PBT‐BMI‐EPDM copolymers. These in situ‐formed copolymers act as compatibilizers to give a significant refinement of the blend morphology. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 2049–2057, 1999     

Enhancing the mechanical,morphological, and rheological behavior of polyethylene/polypropylene blends with maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene

This is the first study to showcase the use of maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene (MAPE) to compatibilize polyethylene (PE)-rich blends, where polypropylene (PP) represents the minor phase. By first mixing PP with MAPE, and then adding PE, MAPE was assumed to be localized at the PE/PP interface. Microscopy analysis confirmed that MAPE led to a remarkably fine PE/PP/MAPE morphology, with PP being uniformly dispersed into PE and having an average diameter 267% smaller than that in the PE/PP blend. According to mechanical and rheological tests, this translated into a 14%, 20%, and 14% enhancement of tensile strength, tensile modulus, and tensile toughness, respectively, as well as a 10% and 20% drop in PE/PP viscosity mismatch and interfacial tension, respectively. Finally, PE/PP/MAPE tensile toughness and elongation at break were greater than those of virgin PP, while PE/PP/MAPE strength and stiffness were similar to the ones of neat PP. Therefore, this study provides industries with the possibility to utilize products rich in PE instead of those made of more expensive PP, while still keeping the level of performance high; hence, creating a paradigm shift in the development of advanced lightweight polyolefin materials with tuned functionalities.     

Modification of low‐density polyethylene by graft copolymerization with maleic anhydride and blends with polyamide 6

Modification of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) hyperbranched grafting with a maleic anhydride (MAH) was carried out using corotating twin screw extruder in the presence of benzoyl peroxide. The LDPE/polyamide 6 (PA6) and LDPE‐g‐MAH/PA6 blends were obtained with a corotating twin screw extruder. The melt viscosity of the grafted LDPE was measured by a capillary rheometer. The grafted copolymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy The effects of variations in temperature, PA6 loading, and benzoyl peroxide and MAH concentration were investigated. The results show that most MAH monomers were grafted onto the LDPE at a lower MAH concentration. With the proper selection of the reaction parameters, we obtained a grafting degree higher than 4.9%. Mechanical test results indicate that the blends had good interfacial adhesion and good stability of the phase structure during heating, which was reflected in the mechanical properties. Furthermore, the results reveal that the tensile strength of the blends increased continuously with increasing PA6 content. Moreover, the home‐synthesized maleated LDPE could be used for the compatibilization of LDPE/PA 6 blends. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Morphology and deformation of compatibilized polystyrene low density polyethylene blends

This investigation deals with the morphology and tensile behavior of polystyrene/low density polyethylene blends compatibilized by hydrogenated styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene triblock copolymer. The stress‐strain measurements indicate that blends with excellent toughness were achieved, due to the compatibilizing role of the triblock copolymer in the system. The morphology of the blends was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the results show that the state of polystyrene changes from continuous phase to dispersed phase with increasing LDPE content. The correlation between mechanical properties and morphology is discussed. The morphologies of the tensile bars were also examined by SEM, and the deformation mechanisms of the blend were further analysed according to fractography. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Linear viscoelastic behavior of compatibilized PMMA/PP blends

In this work, the morphology and linear viscoelastic behavior of PMMA/PP blends to which a graft copolymer PP‐g‐PMMA has been added was studied. The copolymer concentration varied from 1 to 10 wt % relative to the dispersed phase concentration. The rheological data were used to infer the interfacial tension between the blended components. It was observed that PP‐g‐PMMA was effective as a compatibilizer for PMMA/PP blends. For PP‐g‐PMMA concentration added below the critical concentration of interface saturation, two rheological behaviors were observed depending on the blend concentration: for 70/30 blend, the storage modulus, at low frequencies, increased as compared to the one of the unmodified blend; for 90/10 blend, it decreased. For 90/10 blend, the relaxation spectrum presented an interfacial relaxation time related to the presence of the compatibilizer (τ_β). For PP‐g‐PMMA concentrations added above the critical concentration of interface saturation, the storage modulus of all blends increased as compared with the one of the unmodified blend. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Phase morphology and thermomechanical analysis of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer blends: Uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized blends with two mixing sequences

The phase morphology developing in immiscible poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) blends was studied with an in situ reactively generated SAN‐g‐EPDM compatibilizer through the introduction of a suitably chosen polymer additive (maleic anhydride) and 2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐di‐(t‐butyl peroxy) hexane (Luperox) and dicumyl peroxide as initiators during melt blending. Special attention was paid to the experimental conditions required for changing the droplet morphology for the dispersed phase. Two different mixing sequences (simple and two‐step) were used. The product of two‐step blending was a major phase surrounded by rubber particles; these rubber particles contained the occluded matrix phase. Depending on the mixing sequence, this particular phase morphology could be forced or could occur spontaneously. The composition was stabilized by the formation of the SAN‐g‐EPDM copolymer between the elastomer and addition polymer, which was characterized with Fourier transform infrared. As for the two initiators, the blends with Luperox showed better mechanical properties. Scanning electron microscopy studies revealed good compatibility for the SAN/EPDM blends produced by two‐step blending with this initiator. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis studies showed that the two‐step‐prepared blend with Luperox had the best compatibility. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011