Nonisothermal crystallization,melting behavior,and morphology of polypropylene/linear bimodal polyethylene blends

The nonisothermal crystallization, melting behavior, and morphology of isotactic polypropylene (PP)/linear bimodal polyethylene (LBPE) blends were studied with differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and polarized optical microscopy. The results showed that PP and LBPE were miscible to a certain extent, and there was no obvious phase separation in the blends. The modified Avrami analysis, Ozawa equation, and Mo method were used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization nucleation of the blends was homogeneous, the growth of spherulites was three‐dimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected much by LBPE. The crystallization activation energy was estimated by the Kissinger method. The results obtained with the modified Avrami analysis, Mo method, and Kissinger method agreed well. The addition of a minor LBPE phase favored an increase in the overall crystallization rate of PP, showing some dilution effect of LBPE on PP. The PP spherulites decreased obviously with increasing content of LBPE. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Melting,nonisothermal crystallization behavior and morphology of polypropylene/random ethylene—propylene copolymer blends

The melting, nonisothermal crystallization behavior and morphology of blends of polypropylene (PP) with random ethylene–propylene copolymer (PP‐R) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X‐ray diffraction. The results showed that PP and PP‐R were very miscible and cocrystallizable. Modified Avrami analysis was used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization nucleation of the blends was heterogeneous, the growth of the spherulites was tridimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected by PP‐R. The crystallization activation energy was estimated using the Kissinger method. An interesting result was obtained with the modified Avrami analysis and the Kissinger method, whose conclusions were in good agreement. The addition of a minor PP‐R phase favored an increase in the overall crystallization rate of PP. Maximum enhancing effect wass found to occur with a PP‐R content of 20 wt %. The relationship between the composition and the morphology of the blends is discussed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 670–678, 2006     

Nonisothermal crystallization,melting behavior,and morphology of PP/EPPE blends

Nonisothermal crystallization, melting behavior, and morphology of polypropylene (PP)/Easy processing polyethylene (EPPE) blends were studied by differential scanning alorimetry (DSC) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results showed that PP and EPPE are miscible, and there is no obvious phase separation in microphotographs of the blends. The modified Avrami analysis, Ozawa equation, and also Mo Z.S. method were used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. Values of Avrami exponent indicated the crystallization nucleation of the blends is homogeneous, the growth of spherulites is tridimensional, and crystallization mechanism of PP is not affected much by EPPE. The crystallization activation energy was estimated by Kissinger method. The result obtained from modified Avrami analysis, Mo Z.S. method, and Kissinger methods were well agreed. The addition of minor EPPE phase favored to decrease the overall crystallization rate of PP, showing some dilution effect of EPPE on PP. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of glass‐bead‐filled polypropylene

The effects of the glass‐bead content and size on the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of polypropylene (PP)/glass‐bead blends were studied with differential scanning calorimetry. The degree of crystallinity decreased with the addition of glass bead, and the crystallization temperature of the blends was marginally higher than that of pure PP at various cooling rates. Furthermore, the half‐time for crystallization decreased with an increase in the glass‐bead content or particle size, implying the nucleating role of the glass beads. The nonisothermal crystallization data were analyzed with the methods of Avrami, Ozawa, and Mo. The validity of various kinetic models for the nonisothermal crystallization process of PP/glass‐bead blends was examined. The approach developed by Mo successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PP and PP/glass‐bead blends. Finally, the activation energy for the nonisothermal crystallization of pure PP and PP/glass‐bead blends based on the Kissinger method was evaluated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2026–2033, 2006     

Melting behavior,isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PP/mLLDPE blends

Melting behavior, nonisothermal crystallization and isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP) with metallocene‐catalyzed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results show that PP and mLLDPE were partially miscible. The Avrami analysis was applied to analyze the nonisothermal and isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends, the Mo Z.S. method was used to take a comparison in nonisothermal kinetics. Values of Avrami exponent indicate the crystallization nucleations of both pure PP and PP in the blends were heterogeneous, the growth of spherulites is tridimensional and the spherulites in the blends were more perfect than that in pure PP. The crystallization activation energy was estimated by Kissinger method and Arrhenius equation and the two methods draw similar results. The mLLDPE increased the crystallization rate of PP in nonisothermal crystallization process and decreased it in isothermal process. The results from nonisothermal crystallization and isothermal crystallization kinetics were not consistent because the two processes were completely different. Addition of minor mLLDPE phase favors to increase the overall crystallinity of PP, showing the mLLDPE entered the PP crystals. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Melting behavior,nonisothermal crystallization kinetics,and morphology of PP/nylon 11/EPDM‐g‐MAH blends

The melting behavior, nonisothermal crystallization behavior, and morphology of pure polypropylene (PP) and its blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and polarized optical microscopy. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was analyzed using the Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the equation combining the Avrami and Ozawa method. The surface fold free energy and the effective activation energy for both PP and its blends were obtained by Hoffman‐Lauritzen theory and Vyazovkin's approach, respectively. The results showed that the presence of nylon 11 hindered the mobility of PP chains but accelerated the overall crystallization rate. The POM observation confirmed that the addition of nylon 11 decreased the spherulites size of PP matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Poly(propylene)–poly(propylene)‐grafted maleic anhydride–organic montmorillonite (PP–PP‐g‐MAH–Org‐MMT) nanocomposites. II. Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(propylene) (PP), PP–organic‐montmorillonite (Org‐MMT) composite, and PP–PP‐grafted maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH)–Org‐MMT nanocomposites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at various cooling rates. Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and a method developed by Mo well‐described the nonisothermal crystallization process of these samples. The difference in the exponent n between PP and composite (either PP–Org‐MMT or PP–PP‐g‐MAH–Org‐MMT) indicated that nonisothermal kinetic crystallization corresponded to tridimensional growth with heterogeneous nucleation. The values of half‐time, Z_c; and F(T) showed that the crystallization rate increased with the increasing of cooling rates for PP and composites, but the crystallization rate of composites was faster than that of PP at a given cooling rate. The method developed by Ozawa can also be applied to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of PP, but did not describe that of composites. Moreover, the method proposed by Kissinger was used to evaluate the activation energy of the mentioned samples. The results showed that the activation energy of PP–Org‐MMT was much greater than that of PP, but the activation energy of PP–PP‐g‐MAH–Org‐MMT was close to that of pure PP. Overall, the results indicate that the addition of Org‐MMT and PP‐g‐MAH may accelerate the overall nonisothermal crystallization process of PP. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 3093–3099, 2003     

Crystallization behavior of starch‐filled polypropylene

Starches of different granule sizes, including corn, rice, and amaranth starches, were used to prepare starch‐filled polypropylene (PP) and the effect of starch granule size on crystallization behavior PP was investigated. Differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy were used to monitor the energy changes of the crystallization of the melt and to characterize the morphology of PP/starch composites, respectively. Little interaction was observed between starch and PP despite the difference in starch granule size. The crystallization temperature of PP decreased with the addition of starch and this decrease became more apparent with increasing starch granule size. During nonisothermal crystallization, the dependency of the relative degree of crystallinity on time was described by the Avrami equation. The addition of starch decreased the overall crystallization rate of PP, which was attributed to an increase in the activation energy of crystallization under nonisothermal conditions according to the Kissinger equation. An increase in starch granule size of starch would increase the crystallization activation energy of PP and consequently decrease its crystallization rate. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 484–492, 2004     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene/polypropylene‐g‐polystyrene/polystyrene blends

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP), PP/polystyrene (PS), and PP/PP‐g‐PS/PS blends were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry at different cooling rates. The Jeziorny modified Avrami equation, Ozawa method, and Mo method were used to describe the crystallization kinetics for all of the samples. The kinetics parameters, including the half‐time of crystallization, the peak crystallization temperature, the Avrami exponent, the kinetic crystallization rate constant, the crystallization activation energy, and the F(T) and a parameters were determined. All of the results clearly indicate that the PP‐g‐PS copolymer accelerated the crystallization rate of the PP component in the PP/PP‐g‐PS/PS blends. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of highly exfoliated polypropylene/clay nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization

Polypropylene/clay nanocomposites (PPCNs) were prepared via an in situ polymerization method with a Ziegler–Natta/clay compound catalyst in which the MgCl₂/TiCl₄ catalyst was embedded in the clay galleries. The wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy results showed that the clay particles were highly exfoliated in the polypropylene (PP) matrix. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of these PPCNs were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry at various cooling rates. The nucleation activity were calculated by Dobreva's method to demonstrate that the highly dispersed silicate layers acted as effective nucleating agents. The Avrami, Jeziorny, Ozawa, and Mo methods were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of the PP and PPCNs. Various parameters of nonisothermal crystallization, such as the crystallization half‐time, crystallization rate constant, and the kinetic parameter F(t), reflected that the highly exfoliated silicate layers significantly accelerated the crystallization process because of its outstanding nucleation effect. The activation energy values of the PP and PPCNs determined by the Kissinger method increased with the addition of the nanosilicate layers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Melting behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene/metallocene‐catalyzed polyethylene elastomer blends

Polypropylene (PP)/metallocene‐catalyzed polyethylene elastomer (mPE) blends were prepared in a twin‐screw extruder. The melting behavior, crystallization behavior, and isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends were studied with differential scanning calorimetry. The results showed that PP and mPE were partially miscible and that the addition of mPE shifted the melting peak of PP to a lower temperature but the crystallization temperature to a higher temperature, demonstrating a dilution effect of mPE on PP. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends were described with the Avrami equation. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the nucleation mechanism of the blends was heterogeneous, the growth of spherulites was almost three‐dimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected much by mPE. At the same time, the Avrami exponents of the blends were higher than that of pure PP, and this showed that the addition of mPE helped PP to form more perfect spherulites. The crystallization rate of PP was increased by mPE because the dilution effect of mPE on PP increased the mobility of PP chains. The crystallization activation energy was estimated with the Arrhenius equation, and the nucleation constant was determined by the Hoffman–Lauritzen theory. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene‐layered double hydroxide composites: Correlation with morphology

In this work the effect of nanofiller on nonisothermal crystallization behavior of composites based on polypropylene (PP) was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The materials were prepared by melt mixing. Both an alkyl sulfonate salt modified layered double hydroxide (LDH) and an unmodified LDH were used as nanofillers and both PP and PP/polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA) blend were used as matrices. The morphology of composites was investigated by X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. No exfoliation was noticed in all prepared composites, but the hybrid materials showed an intercalated structure. The thermal properties and crystallization behavior were studied by conventional differential scanning calorimetry. In particular, the kinetic crystallization parameters were obtained using the modified Avrami equation for a nonisothermal process, whereas the activation energy of the global crystallization process was estimated using the Kissinger equation. The Avrami parameters suggest a significant effect on the crystallization of PP for the composites containing both the organically modified LDH and PP‐g‐MA. The results indicate a complex crystallization process of PP and evidence that the crystallization process can not be only explained by intercalation phenomenon, but the constrain effect ofpolymer chains on the filler surface and/or betweenthe filler clusters should play a significant role. POLYM. COMPOS., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(vinylidene fluoride) in a poly(vinylidene fluoride)/dibutyl phthalate/di(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate system via thermally induced phase separation

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) in PVDF/dibutyl phthalate (DBP)/di(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) blends via thermally induced phase separation were investigated through differential scanning calorimetry measurements. The Ozawa approach failed to describe the crystallization behavior of PVDF in PVDF/DBP/DEHP blends, whereas the modified Avrami equation successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization process of PVDF. Two stages of crystallization were observed in this analysis, including primary crystallization and secondary crystallization. The influence of the cooling rate and DBP ratio in the diluent mixture on the crystallization mechanism and crystal structure was determined by this method. The Mo approach well explained the kinetics of primary crystallization. An analysis of these two methods indicated that the increase in the DBP ratio in the diluent mixture caused a decrease in the crystallization rate at the primary crystallization stage. The activation energy was determined according to the Kissinger method and also decreased with the DBP ratio in the diluent mixture increasing. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Morphology and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PP/Novolac blends

The morphology and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PP/Novolac blends were studied with scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimeter, polarized optical microscopy (POM), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). The results showed that the crystallization of PP in PP/Novolac blends was strongly influenced by cooling rate, size of Novolac particles, crosslinking, and compatibilizer maleic anhydride‐grafted PP (MPP). In dynamically cured PP/MPP/Novolac blends, the MPP grafted on the surface of cured Novolac particles and formed a chemical linkage through the reaction of anhydride groups with the hexamethylenetetramine. The graft copolymer not only improved interfacial compatibility but also acted as an effective heterogeneous nucleating agent, which accelerates the crystallization of PP. The combination of Avrami and Ozawa equations exhibited great advantages in treating the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics in dynamically cured PP/MPP/Novolac blends. The POM results showed that the spherulite morphology and the size of PP in PP/MPP/Novolac blends were greatly affected by Novolac. WAXD experiment demonstrates that the PP and dynamically cured PP/MPP/Novolac blends showed only the α crystal form. At the same time, the addition of Novolac resin also affects the crystal size of PP. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Thermal properties and crystallization behavior of polyolefin ternary blends

Crystallization behaviors, spherulite growth and structure, and the crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐α‐olefln copolymer (mPE)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) ternary blends and of mPE/HDPE binary blends have been studied using polarizing optical micrography (POM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). In mPE/HDPE blends, large pendant groups of mPE disturbed spherulite growth of HDPE, leading to a different crystallite morphology and isothermal kinetics. Non‐isothermal properties, morphology, and isothermal crystallization kinetics of PP in ternary blends were significantly influenced by the composition and crystallization behavior of the mPE/HDPE binary blends as well as the crystallization condition. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1858–1865, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of a semicrystalline copolyterephthalamide based on poly(decamethylene terephthalamide)

The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of a semicrystalline copolyterephthalamide based on poly(decamethylene terephthalamide) (PA‐10T) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Several kinetic analyses were used to describe the crystallization process. The commonly used Avrami equation and the one modified by Jeziorny were used, respectively, to describe the primary stage of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization. The Avrami exponent n was evaluated to be in the range of 2.36–2.67 for isothermal crystallization, and of 3.05–5.34 for nonisothermal crystallization. The Ozawa analysis failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior, whereas the Mo–Liu equation, a combination equation of Avrami and Ozawa formulas, successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics. In addition, the value of crystallization rate coefficient under nonisothermal crystallization conditions was calculated. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 819–826, 2004     

Preparation of nano poly(phenylsilsesquioxane) spheres(nano‐PPSQ) and study of the thermal stability and crystallization behavior of PP/nano‐PPSQ composites

The preparation of nano poly(phenylsilsesquioxane) particles (nano‐PPSQ) and the influence of nano‐PPSQ on the thermal stability and crystallization of polypropylene (PP) were studied. The morphology and thermal stability of PP/nano‐PPSQ composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The SEM result showed that the particles were well dispersed in the PP matrix. The TGA results of the PP/nano‐PPSQ composites indicated that the incorporation of nano‐PPSQ can improve the thermal stability of PP. The crystallization behavior and kinetics of PP/nano‐PPSQ composite were studied by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The XRD revealed that the addition of nano‐PPSQ influences the crystallinity and crystal size of PP. The Avrami, Ozawa, and combined Avrami/Ozawa (Mo method) equations were applied to describe the crystallization kinetics and estimate the kinetic parameters of mathematical models under the nonisothermal crystallization of PP and PP/nano‐PPSQ composites. The results show that nano‐PPSQ influences the crystallization temperature and rate. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Nonisothermal Crystallization Kinetics of Polypropylene/Polyethersulfone Blend

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PP and PP/PES (80/20 wt%) blend was investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It was observed that the crystallization peak temperature (T_p) and the half time (t _1/2) of crystallization of PP/PES blend are slightly but consistently lower than those of PP at various cooling rates. The nonisothermal crystallization data were analyzed by using Avrami equation, Ozawa and Mo method. The validity of the different kinetics models to the nonisothermal crystallization process of two samples is discussed. The Mo method can successfully explain the overall nonisothermal crystallization process of PP and PP/PES blend. The activation energy (ΔE) for nonisothermal crystallization of PP and PP/PES blend is determined by using the Kissinger method. The result shows that the ΔE value of PP is slightly higher than that of PP/PES blend.     

NONISOTHERMAL CRYSTALLIZATION KINETICS AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PP/NANO-SiO2 COMPOSITES

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP)/nano-SiO₂ composites was studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The modified Avrami theories by Jeziorny, Ozawa, and Mo were used to analyze the data of DSC. The results showed that both the Jeziorny and Mo methods could describe this system very well, but the Ozawa analysis failed. The activation energy was evaluated by the Kissinger method. It was found that the crystallization activation energy of PP was higher than that of PP/nano-SiO₂ composites. The determined results of mechanical properties showed that the addition of nano-SiO₂ increased the mechanical properties of the PP. Micrographs of Polarized optical micrograph (POM) further demonstrated that nano-SiO₂ could toughen the PP.