Chronic morphine treatment exaggerates the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, on saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Three experiments examined the effect of chronic morphine treatment on cocaine-, sucrose-, and lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced suppression of saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats. All rats were either water- or food-deprived and then implanted subcutaneously with 1 morphine (75 mg) or vehicle pellet for 5 days. They were then given brief access to 0.15% saccharin and soon thereafter injected with either cocaine (10 mg/kg sc) LiCl (0.009 M, 1.33 ml/100 g body weight ip), or saline, or in Exp 2, given a 2nd access period to either a preferred 1.0 M sucrose solution ot the same 0.15% saccharin solution. There was 1 taste–drug or taste–taste paring per day for a number of days. The results showed that a history of chronic morphine treatment exaggerated the suppressive effects of a rewarding sucrose solution and cocaine but not those of the aversive agent, LiCl. These data provide further support for the reward compairison hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake.

Rats suppress intake of a normally preferred 0.15% saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired with an aversive agent like lithium chloride (LiCl) or a preferred substance such as sucrose or a drug of abuse. The reward comparison hypothesis suggests that rats avoid intake of a saccharin cue following pairings with a drug of abuse because the rats are anticipating the availability of the rewarding properties of the drug. The present study used bilateral ibotenic acid lesions to examine the role of the gustatory cortex in the suppression of CS intake induced by cocaine, morphine, and LiCl. The results show that bilateral lesions of the insular gustatory cortex (1) fully prevent the suppressive effects of both a 15 and a 30 mg/kg dose of morphine, (2) attenuate the suppressive effect of a 10 mg/kg dose of cocaine, but (3) are overridden by a 20 mg/kg dose of the drug. Finally, these same cortical lesions had no impact on LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion. The current data show that the insular taste cortex plays an integral role in drug-induced avoidance of a gustatory CS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, are greater in Lewis than in Fischer rats: Evidence for the reward comparison hypothesis.

Rats suppress intake of a saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS), an appetitive UCS, or a drug of abuse such as morphine or cocaine. It is unclear, however, whether the reduction in intake induced by these drugs is mediated by their aversive or their rewarding properties. The present set of experiments addressed this question by comparing the suppressive effects of a known aversive UCS (LiCl), a known reinforcing UCS (sucrose), and a drug of abuse (cocaine) in two strains of rats (i.e., Lewis and Fischer 344 rats) that differ in their preference for rewarding stimuli. The results show that, although both strains readily acquired a LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA), the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine were robust in the drug-preferring Lewis rats and absent in the Fischer rats. These data argue against a CTA account and in favor of the reward comparison hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Taste reactivity responses elicited by cocaine-, phencyclidine-, and methamphetamine-paired sucrose solutions.

[Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 107(2) of Behavioral Neuroscience (see record 2008-10474-001). Table 1, on page 119, contains two errors. In the first section, the dose/route for the agent nicotine should read as follows: 1.2-2.0 mg/kg sc. In the second section, the dose/route for the agent morphine should read as follows: 2-80 mg/kg ip. Also, on page 121, paragraph 3, line 14, the parenthetical information after 40 mg/kg cocaine should read (40C; 2 × 20 mg/kg/3 cc).] The nature of flavor–drug associations produced by a range of doses of the reinforcing agents cocaine (5, 10, 15, 20, or 40 mg/kg, sc), phencyclidine (0.5, 2, 10, or 20 mg/kg, sc), and methamphetamine (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg, ip) were assessed by the taste reactivity (TR) test and the conditioned taste avoidance (CTA) test. Even at the highest doses tested, none of the agents produced aversive TR responding. At doses that produced equivalent-strength CTA, lithium did establish aversive TR responding. Results provide evidence that drugs that serve as reinforcers in other paradigms produce conditioned flavor avoidance that is not motivated by a conditioned dislike for the flavor. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Taste reactivity responses elicited by cocaine-, phencyclidine-, and methamphetamine-paired sucrose solutions": Correction to Parker.

Reports an error in "Taste reactivity responses elicited by cocaine-, phencyclidine-, and methamphetamine-paired sucrose solutions" by Linda A. Parker (Behavioral Neuroscience, 1993[Feb], Vol 107[1], 118-129). Table 1, on page 119, contains two errors. In the first section, the dose/route for the agent nicotine should read as follows: 1.2-2.0 mg/kg sc. In the second section, the dose/route for the agent morphine should read as follows: 2-80 mg/kg ip. Also, on page 121, paragraph 3, line 14, the parenthetical information after 40 mg/kg cocaine should read (40C; 2 × 20 mg/kg/3 cc). (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 1993-24959-001.) The nature of flavor–drug associations produced by a range of doses of the reinforcing agents cocaine (5, 10, 15, 20, or 40 mg/kg, sc), phencyclidine (0.5, 2, 10, or 20 mg/kg, sc), and methamphetamine (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg, ip) were assessed by the taste reactivity (TR) test and the conditioned taste avoidance (CTA) test. Even at the highest doses tested, none of the agents produced aversive TR responding. At doses that produced equivalent-strength CTA, lithium did establish aversive TR responding. Results provide evidence that drugs that serve as reinforcers in other paradigms produce conditioned flavor avoidance that is not motivated by a conditioned dislike for the flavor. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of oral caffeine pretreatment on response to intravenous nicotine and cocaine.

Previous research suggests that under conditions of chronic daily caffeine administration, caffeine increases the effects of nicotine. Little is known about the effects of caffeine pretreatment on response to nicotine under infrequent caffeine administration conditions. The present study examined whether infrequent (not on consecutive days) acute oral caffeine administration alters subject-rated, physiological, and monetary value effects of intravenous nicotine in regular users of caffeine, tobacco, and cocaine. To determine the specificity of effects of caffeine on response to nicotine, the effects of caffeine administration on response to intravenous cocaine (another short-acting stimulant) were also studied. Fourteen (1 woman) volunteers participated in this 3–4 week, double-blind, inpatient study. Volunteers participated in 10 experimental conditions in pseudo-randomized order, in which oral caffeine (250 mg/70 kg) or placebo was administered 1 hr before an intravenous injection, consisting of nicotine (1 or 2 mg/70 kg), cocaine (15 or 30 mg/70 kg), or saline. Infrequent acute caffeine pretreatment attenuated the increase resulting from 2 mg/70 kg nicotine administration on ratings of “rush,” “good effects,” “liking,” “high,” and “drowsy/sleepy.” Caffeine had no significant effect on physiological response to nicotine. Caffeine had no significant effect on subject-rated and physiological response to cocaine, with the exception that caffeine significantly augmented blood pressure response to cocaine. In contrast to the previous research using chronic caffeine maintenance, these data suggest that infrequent acute caffeine administration may attenuate nicotine effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hazardous materials and work safety in veterinary practice. 1: Hazardous material definition and characterization, practice documentation and general rules for handling

The role of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in the discriminative and aversive stimulus effects of ethanol was studied in rats. In the operant drug discrimination procedure the rats were trained to discriminate between 1.0 g/kg ethanol and saline under the FR10 schedule of sweetened milk reinforcement. Neither the nAChR agonist, nicotine (0.1-0.6 mg/kg) nor the nAChR antagonist, mecamylamine (3.0-6.0 mg/kg) substituted for the ethanol stimulus. Moreover, mecamylamine (0.5-6.0 mg/kg) did not antagonise the ethanol stimulus. The cross-familiarisation conditioned taste aversion procedure was used as an alternative method to study stimulus resemblance between ethanol and nicotine. Six daily injections of nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) significantly decreased a subsequent ethanol-induced taste aversion conditioning. The aversive stimulus effects of ethanol were investigated with the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. Mecamylamine (1.0-3.0 mg/kg) did not attenuate an ethanol-induced CTA. These results suggest that: (1) nAChRs are not primarily involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol when studied with the operant drug discrimination test; (2) nAChRs are not critically involved in the ethanol-induced CTA.     

Role of the perirhinal cortex in rats' conditioned taste aversion response memorization.

The role of the perirhinal cortex (PC) in conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning was investigated in Long-Evans rats. CTA was induced by the intraperitoneal administration of LiCl 60 min after saccharin-sweetened water drinking. The PC was reversibly inactivated by the stereotaxic administration of tetrodotoxin (TTX) 60 min before saccharin drinking, immediately after saccharin drinking (Experiment 1), 6 or 24 hr after LiCl administration (Experiment 2), and 60 min before CTA retrieval testing (Experiment 3). Only pre-saccharin drinking PC inactivation disrupted CTA. Thus, PC integrity is necessary only during the earliest phases of CTA mnemonic processing, that is, taste information acquisition and early gustatory memory elaboration. The results are discussed in relation to PC connectivity and PC temporal involvement in the memorization process of other aversive responses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Re-examination of amphetamine-induced conditioned suppression of tastant intake in rats: The task-dependent drug effects hypothesis.

This study reexamined Grigson's reward comparison hypothesis (1997), which claimed to have resolved the paradox of addictive, rewarding drugs manifesting an aversive effect in the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. Here, the authors compared the conditioned suppression effects of lithium chloride (LiCl) and amphetamine in a series of three experiments. In Experiment 1, the concentrations of saccharin solution (conditioned stimulus [CS]) and the doses of amphetamine or LiCl (unconditioned stimulus [US]) were manipulated. In Experiment 2, the effects of employing backward versus forward pairings of the CS and US were compared. Finally, in Experiment 3, the additivity of amphetamine's reward property and LiCl's aversive property was examined. The results of these experiments, respectively, indicated that: (1) manipulating saccharin solution concentrations does not distinguish the suppression effect caused by rewarding or aversive effects when amphetamine or LiCl served as the US; (2) both backward and forward pairings produced suppression of saccharin solution intake regardless of whether amphetamine or LiCl was used as the US; and (3) combining amphetamine and LiCl did not diminish the suppression effect, as would be expected if they had opposing mechanisms for the effects; instead, an additive effect occurred. Taken together, these results suggest that the drug of abuse amphetamine and the emetic drug LiCl both possess aversive properties in the CTA paradigm. No rewarding effects of amphetamine were detected in our experimental data. In all, our results do not support the Grigson's reward comparison hypothesis (1997) and a new "task-dependent drug effects hypothesis" is proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of hypothermia on the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Analyzed the mechanism of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) by subjecting 131 male and hooded rats in 5 experiments to reduced body temperature during various phases of CTA acquisition. A 15-min access to .1% saccharin served as the CS, and an ip injection of LiCl (.15 M, 4% of body weight) given 30 min later served as the UCS. Hypothermia (cooling to 20-22°C colonic temperature) alone or combined with anesthesia (Nembutal 20 or 40 mg/kg) did not prevent CTA acquisition when applied during the CS-UCS interval. Hypothermia induced immediately after LiCl administration to anesthetized or unanesthetized Ss failed to disrupt CTA or to increase neophobic rejection of saccharin. On the other hand, hypothermic Ss were not able to form the short-term gustatory trace when the CS (2% saccharin, 1% of body weight) was injected ip, although this procedure yielded significant CTA in euthermic Ss. It is concluded that the most vulnerable link of CTA acquisition is the formation of the short-term gustatory trace. Persistence of the short-term trace, its association with poisoning, and consolidation of the permanent CTA engram are accomplished by mechanisms that are resistant to hypothermia and/or anesthesia. (39 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sensitization to the rewarding effects of the specific dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR12783

The conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by increasing doses (1.25-40 mg/kg) of cocaine or the specific dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR12783 was investigated in rats previously treated with cocaine (10 or 20 mg/kg), GBR12783 (10 mg/kg) or morphine (10 mg/kg) for 15 days. In solvent-pretreated rats, cocaine- and GBR12783-induced CPPs were biphasic, with the highest scores observed at 20 mg/kg. Prior exposure to GBR12783 sensitized the rats to the rewarding effects of low doses of either GBR12783 or cocaine. Pretreatment with cocaine 20 mg/kg, but not 10 mg/kg, sensitized the rats to its own rewarding effects. Furthermore, it was less efficient than GBR12783 in sensitizing the animals to the rewarding effects of both drugs. These data confirm the major role of dopamine uptake inhibition in the sensitization process. On the other hand, the magnitude of CPP induced by a high dose of both drugs (20 mg/kg) was decreased after pretreatment with either GBR12783 or cocaine, reaching the lower scores observed at 40 mg/kg. This decrease was unrelated to altered anxiety level but was associated with sensitization to stereotypies. Morphine pretreatment modified neither the CPP induced by high doses of cocaine or GBR12783 nor cocaine- or GBR12783-induced stereotypies. However, prior exposure to morphine sensitized the rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine (2.5 mg/kg) but not to those of GBR12783, suggesting that other mechanisms working in concert with dopamine may facilitate the rewarding effect of cocaine without affecting that of GBR12783.     

Clonidine antagonizes the aversive effects of opiate withdrawal and the rewarding effects of morphine only in opiate withdrawn rats.

The researchers asked whether clonidine, an α?-noradrenergic agonist, would block selectively the motivational effects of opiate withdrawal and whether clonidine's effects would respect the boundary between nondeprived and deprived motivational states. In a place conditioning paradigm, clonidine (0.05 mg/kg ip) blocked the rewarding effects of morphine in opiate-withdrawn rats (as well as the aversive properties of withdrawal itself), but did not affect morphine place preferences (2 and 20 mg/kg) in drug-naive rats. Furthermore, clonidine blocked the acquisition of morphine (15 mg/kg), but not LiCI (15 mg/kg), conditioned taste aversions in water-deprived rats. The results suggest that the motivational system activated in deprived animals includes dopaminergic and noradrenergic components that are in series with each other. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effects of cadmium contamination on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and related drugs.

Rats were exposed to a diet containing 100 ppm cadmium chloride or a control diet. At 52 days of exposure, rats were trained to discriminate between saline and 5 mg/kg cocaine injections. After acquisition training, successive substitution tests were conducted using cocaine, the indirect dopamine agonist d-amphetamine, the mixed D?-D? agonist apomorphine, SKF 38393 and SKF 82958 (both preferential D? agonists), quinpirole (a preferential D? agonist), GBR 12909 (a dopamine reuptake inhibitor), procaine (a local anesthetic), and morphine (an opiate). The results showed that cadmium-exposed rats were slower to acquire the saline–cocaine discrimination than controls. Moreover, cadmium contamination reduced substitution when apomorphine, SKF 82958, and GBR 12909 were presented during generalization testing. Also, cadmium exposure blocked tolerance to cocaine that was evident in control rats following 14 days of exposure to 60 mg/kg/day cocaine. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Caffeine promotes an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: A dose-dependent interaction.

The present study examined whether caffeine administered within a dose range previously shown to promote ethanol drinking would also alter an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results revealed a dose-dependent interaction between caffeine and ethanol where caffeine (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) promoted an ethanol-induced CTA at a low ethanol dose (1.0 g/kg) but had no effect in blocking CTA at the higher ethanol dose (1.5 g1kg). These results were found to be unrelated to an alteration in ethanol metabolism, as caffeine had no effect in altering blood ethanol levels at the doses tested. In agreement with the reward comparison hypothesis, the present results suggest that rather than attenuate ethanol's "aversive" effects, caffeine may have promoted an ethanol-induced CTA by increasing the reinforcing efficacy of ethanol. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Possible mechanisms of salt-induced hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats

The effects of acute and chronic administration of cocaine on the antinociception and tolerance to the antinociceptive actions of mu-(morphine), kappa-(U-50,488H), and delta-([D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin; DPDPE), opioid receptor agonists were determined in male Swiss-Webster mice. Intraperitoneal injection of 40 mg/kg of cocaine by itself produced weak antinociceptive response as measured by the tail-fick test but the lower doses were ineffective. Administration of morphine (10 mg/kg, SC), U-50,488H (25 mg/kg, IP) or DPDPE (10 microg/mouse, ICV) produced antinociception in mice. Cocaine (20 mg/kg) potentiated the antinociceptive action of morphine and DPDPE but had no effect on U-50,488H-induced antinociception. Administration of morphine (20 mg/kg, SC), U-50,488H (25 mg/kg, IP) or DPDPE (20 microg/mouse, ICV) twice a day for 4 days resulted in the development of tolerance to their antinociceptive actions. Tolerance to the antinociceptive actions of morphine and U-50,488H was inhibited by concurrent treatment with 20 or 40 mg/kg doses of cocaine; however, tolerance to the antinociceptive action of DPDPE was not modified by cocaine. It is concluded that cocaine selectively potentiates the antinociceptive action of mu- and delta- but not of the kappa-opioid receptor agonist. On the other hand, cocaine inhibits the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive actions of mu- and kappa- but not of delta-opioid receptor agonists in mice.     

Yoked delivery of cocaine is aversive and protects against the motivation for drug in rats.

In Experiment 1, water-deprived rats had 5-min access to saccharin followed by active or yoked intravenous delivery of saline or cocaine (0.33 mg/infusion). Both cocaine groups avoided intake of the saccharin cue following saccharin–cocaine pairings; however, the rats in the yoked condition exhibited greater avoidance of the taste cue than did the actively administering rats. Experiment 2 evaluated subsequent self-administration behavior on fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement. The results showed that prior yoked exposure to cocaine reduced subsequent drug-taking behavior on a progressive-ratio but not on a fixed-ratio schedule. Finally, Experiment 3 used a choice test to determine the impact of yoked drug delivery on the relative preference for cocaine versus water. The results showed that rats with a history of self-administering cocaine preferred to perform operant behaviors on the side of the chamber previously paired with cocaine, whereas the rats with a history of yoked delivery of cocaine avoided this side. These data show that, in most rats, the unpredictable, uncontrollable delivery of cocaine protects against the subsequent motivation for cocaine through an aversive mechanism. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Nicotine as a conditioned stimulus: Impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications.

People diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at an increased risk to start smoking and have greater difficulty quitting. Nicotine, one of the principal addictive components of tobacco smoke, functioned as a conditioned stimulus (CS) for intermittent sucrose delivery in a Pavlovian drug discrimination task with rats. This study compared the ability of commonly prescribed ADHD medications (i.e., methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and bupropion) and additional dopamine reuptake inhibitors (i.e., cocaine and GBR 12909) to substitute for the CS effects of nicotine. Atomoxetine was also used to antagonize these CS effects. Rats acquired the discrimination as evidenced by increased dipper entries in nicotine (0.2 mg base/kg) sessions as compared with saline sessions. Nicotine generalization was dose dependent. Bupropion (10 and 20 mg/kg), methylphenidate (10 mg/kg), and cocaine (5 and 10 mg/kg) partially substituted for the 0.2 mg/kg nicotine CS. Atomoxetine did not substitute for the nicotine CS; however, atomoxetine (1 to 10 mg/kg) partially blocked nicotine's CS effects. These results suggest that atomoxetine, bupropion, and/or methylphenidate may be effective treatments for people diagnosed with ADHD and addicted to nicotine. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Characteristics of target-reaching in cats. III. Lifting and protraction with an obstacle in the movement path and after its removal

We have established a rat model that reflects the course of development of alcohol and opiate addiction. The present study with d-amphetamine aimed to define general principles in the development of an addiction. Male rats had a continuous free choice between d-amphetamine solutions (100, 200 and 400 mg/l) and water for 47 weeks. An initial intake of high doses of d-amphetamine during the first weeks of drug choice was followed by an individually stable pattern of drug consumption of moderate drug doses. During this period of controlled consumption (from week 10 to week 40), the voluntary intake of d-amphetamine depended on individual factors (dominant rats: 0.37+/-0.02 mg/kg per day, subordinate rats: 0.57+/-0.05 mg/kg per day) and environmental variables (group housing: 0.21+/-0.02 mg/kg per day, single housing: 0.41+/-0.03 mg/kg per day). Beginning with week 41, voluntary d-amphetamine consumption progressively increased (1.9+/-0.2 mg/kg per day in week 47), although the experimental conditions remained unchanged. Drug intake during a retest (free choice as before) after 6 months of drug deprivation revealed that the rats had persistently lost their control over drug intake and were no longer able to adjust drug taking to internal and external conditions. These addicted rats took very high drug doses, even when all d-amphetamine solutions but not water were adulterated with bitter tasting quinine (6.6+/-0.6 mg/kg per day; age-matched controls: 0.37+/-0.04 mg/kg per day). Forced intake of d-amphetamine for 47 weeks (7.1+/-0.3 mg/kg per day) via the drinking fluid caused physical dependence (hyperreactivity during withdrawal) but did not lead to drug addiction (voluntary intake in the retest with adulteration: 0.42+/-0.04 mg/kg per day). Both the temporal development and the prerequisites of psychostimulant addiction were in principle the same as for alcohol and opiates.     

The painlike effect of gallamine and naloxone differs from sickness induced by lithium chloride.

In 3 experiments with 60 male Sprague-Dawley rats, LiCl (31.8 mg/kg, ip) produced stronger taste aversions than gallamine triethiodide (10 mg/kg) or naloxone HCl (2.5 or 20 mg/kg), but gallamine and naloxone each produced stronger place aversions than lithium. Findings support the distinction between 2 kinds of drug-induced aversive effects, with different associative properties. One effect, called sickness, is more associable with taste than with place cues; the 2nd effect is, like pain, more associable with place than with taste. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine antagonist PNU-99194A in rats: comparison with psychomotor stimulants

The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine receptor antagonist PNU-99194A [5,6-di-methoxy-2-(dipropylamino)indan-hydrochloride] in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Eight rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline in a two-choice, water-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. In tests of stimulus generalization, PNU-99194A (1.25-40.0 mg/kg, s.c. and i.p.) did not substitute for cocaine. PNU-99194A (5.0-20 mg/kg) also did not significantly block the discrimination of cocaine (10 mg/kg), nor did it potentiate a low dose (1.25 mg/kg) of cocaine. A separate group of eight rats were trained to discriminate PNU-99194A from saline. These subjects met the discrimination criterion within an average of 68 (S.E.M. = 6.5) training sessions; the ED50 for PNU-99194A was 2.6 mg/kg. In stimulus generalization tests, cocaine (1.25-10 mg/kg) did not substitute for PNU-99194A, when administered by either i.p. or by s.c. injection. In addition, neither amphetamine (0.25-1.0 mg/kg) nor caffeine (8.0-64 mg/kg) produced stimulus generalization in these rats. These results indicate that D3 receptors do not play a critical role in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Furthermore, although PNU-99194A is capable of establishing and maintaining discriminative stimulus control in rats, the effects of this D3-preferring antagonist are dissimilar from those of psychomotor stimulants. Given the unique behavioral profile of D3 receptor antagonists, the potential utility of these agents as adjunctive treatments for psychostimulant abuse is discussed.