Comparison of some butadiene-based impact modifiers for polycarbonate

The relationship of blend morphology to deformation mechanisms and notched Izod impact strength was studied with three butadiene-based impact modifiers for polycarbonate (PC). The impact modifiers were a linear polybutadiene (PB), a styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS), and a structured latex particle having a PB core and methyl methacrylate/styrene shell (MBS). The particle-size distribution in the blends was determined from transmission electron micrographs (TEM). Fractographic analysis combined with TEM examination of thin sections from impacted specimens provided insight into the failure mechanisms. Good impact was achieved with PC/MBS blends when cavitation of the core–shell particles relieved triaxiality and enabled the matrix to fracture by the plane stress ductile tearing mode that is characteristic of thin PC. The best impact properties were obtained with PC/SBS blends when the modifier was dispersed as aggregates of small particles. Cavitation at the weak internal boundaries relieved triaxiality, but subsequent coalescence of cavitated particles during ductile drawing of the matrix created critical size voids and the resulting secondary cracks reduced the toughness of the blend. In general, PB did not significantly enhance the impact strength of PC. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Thermo-responsive shape memory properties based on polylactic acid and styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer

This study aims to compare thermal, mechanical, and shape memory behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) blended with different structures of styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer (SBS), namely linear SBS (L-SBS), and radial SBS (R-SBS). The amount of L-SBS and R-SBS added was varied between 10 and 70 wt%, and the blending process was carried out using an internal mixer at 180°C before the shaping process by the compression molding. An improvement in the degree of crystallinity was observed across the entire composition range with less pronounced transition temperature change. Tensile strength and modulus of PLA/L-SBS blends were higher than PLA/R-SBS blends across all composition ranges. The results also revealed that the shape fixing ratio (R_f) and recovery ratio (R_r) of PLA/L-SBS were higher than PLA/R-SBS, with PLA70/SBS30 showed the best shape memory behavior. The morphology characteristics of the blend were also examined with the scanning electron microscope.     

Blends of SBS triblock copolymer with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polystyrene mixture

Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) or styrene–ethylene/1‐butene–styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with a commercial mixture of polystyrene (PS) and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) were prepared in the melt at different temperatures according to the chemical kind of the copolymer. Although solution‐cast SBS/PPO and SBS/PS blends were already known in the literature, a general and systematic study of the miscibility of the PS/PPO blend with a styrene‐based triblock copolymer in the melt was still missing. The thermal and mechanical behavior of SBS/(PPO/PS) blends was investigated by means of DSC and dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMTA). The results were then compared to analogous SEBS/(PPO/PS) blends, for which the presence of a saturated olefinic block allowed processing at higher temperatures (220°C instead of 180°C). All the blends were further characterized by SEM and TGA to tentatively relate the observed properties with the blends' morphology and degradation temperature. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2698–2705, 2003     

Toughening of recycled polystyrene used for TV backset

The recycled polystyrene (rPS) was toughened with ethylene‐octylene copolymer thermoplastic elastomer (POE) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with various melt flow index (MFI), compatibilized by styrene‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (SBS) to enhance the toughness of rPS for use as TV backset. The rPS/POE binary blends exhibited an increased impact strength with 5–10 wt % POE content followed by a decrease with the POE content up to 20 wt %, which could be due to poor compatibility between POE and rPS. For rPS/POE/SBS ternary blends with 20 wt % of POE content, the impact strength increased dramatically and a sharp brittle‐ductile transition was observed as the SBS content was around 3–5 wt %. Rheological study indicated a possible formation of network structure by adding of SBS, which could be a new mechanism for rPS toughening. In rPS/POE/HDPE/SBS (70/20/5/5) quaternary blends, a fibril‐like structure was observed as the molecular weight of HDPE was higher (with lower MFI). The presence of HDPE fibers in the blends could not enhance the network structure, but could stop the crack propagation during fracture process, resulting in a further increase of the toughness. The prepared quaternary blend showed an impact strength of 9.3 kJ/m² and a tensile strength of 25 MPa, which can be well used for TV backset to substitute HIPS because this system is economical and environmental friendly. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Interfacial adhesion evaluation in (low‐density polyethylene)/elastomer blends

Low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) with different elastomers at a ratio of 50/50 wt% blends was prepared by using a co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder. Three kinds of elastomers were used: ground tire rubber (GTR), partially crosslinked butyl rubber (Kalar^®), and styrene‐butadiene‐rubber block copolymer (SBS; Kraton^®). For better characterization of interaction between polyethylene and elastomer, influence of the type of elastomer on the properties of compositions LDPE/elastomer was determined. In the studies, two types of partially crosslinked butyl rubber (differing over filler content and Mooney viscosity) and two types of SBS (differing over structure: linear/branched) were used. The influence of kind and type of elastomer on static mechanical properties (tensile strength, elongation at break, hardness), dynamic mechanical properties, thermal properties, and morphology of obtained compositions were characterized. LDPE/linear SBS copolymer blend had the best mechanical properties, as a result of better compatibility in comparison with other investigated blends. The reason for improved compatibility was an increase of mobility of chain segments in the amorphous phase of polyethylene associated with their partial plasticization by flexible polybutadiene blocks present in SBS copolymer. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:492–500, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer structure on its compatibilization efficiency in PS/PB and PS/PP blends

Two styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymers differing in the length of their styrene blocks (40S‐60B‐40S and 10S‐60B‐10S) were used as compatibilizers for PS/PB (4/1) and PS/PP (4/1) blends. The supramolecular structure of the copolymers determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), morphology of the blends using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and their tensile impact strength were chosen as criteria of the compatibilization efficiency of the copolymers used. Different mechanisms of compatibilization for “symmetrical” system (PS/PB/SBS) and “asymmetrical” system (PS/PP/SBS) were proved. While for the PS/PB blend, the 40S‐60B‐40S copolymer proved to be a good compatibilizer, for the PS/PP blend, surprisingly, the 10S‐60B‐10S copolymer is more efficient.     

Studies on dynamically vulcanized polypropylene (PP)/butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) blends: Crystallization and thermal behavior

Crystallization of polypropylene (PP) in unvulcanized blends of PP with the butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS) was studied through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X‐ray diffraction measurements in the composition range of 0–40 wt % SBS content. Analysis of the crystallization exotherms revealed variation in the crystallization behavior, crystallinity, and crystalline morphology of the PP component in the blends at various levels of SBS concentration. The crystallinity determined by X‐ray diffraction and DSC showed identical variations with the blend composition. The tensile and thermal properties of the blends were studied in the entire composition range. Correlations of the tensile properties with the crystallization parameters of the PP component in the blends are also presented. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 151–161, 1999     

Reactive modification and compatibilization of poly(lactide) and poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) blends with epoxy functionalized‐poly(lactide) for blown film applications

Biodegradable blown films comprising of poly(lactide) (PLA) and poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT) were produced using epoxy functionalized‐poly(lactide) (EF‐PLA) reactive modifiers for rheological enhancement and compatibilization. The epoxy groups on the EF‐PLA modifiers react with PBAT forming an in situ copolymer that localizes at the blend interphase resulting in compatibilization of the polymer blend components. The EF‐PLA modified polymer blends have improved melt strength and the resultant films showed better processability as seen by increased bubbled stability. This allowed for blown films with higher PLA content (70%) compared to the unmodified control films (40%). The static charge build‐up typically experienced with PLA film blowing was decreased with the inclusion of EF‐PLA yielding films with better slip and softness. The compatibilization effect of the EF‐PLA modifiers resulted in significant improvement in mechanical properties. For example, dart test performance was up to four times higher than the control, especially at higher PLA concentrations. Therefore, the rheological enhancement and compatibilization effects of the EF‐PLA reactive modifiers make them ideally suited to create high PLA content films. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43310.     

Synergistic effect of dual rubber system in toughening styrene maleic anhydride copolymers

Styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymers were toughened by blending with two distinctly different rubber modifiers: styrene‐butadiene‐styrene (SBS) block copolymer and methacrylated butadiene‐styrene emulsion‐made graft copolymer (MBS). The modifiers were used both individually and in combination for the examination of their roles in toughening SMA. SMA was miscible with poly(methylmethacrylate) shell of MBS, whereas it was partially miscible with the polystyrene (PS) phase of SBS. When 40–50% of SBS was used in blends, the PS phase of SBS became immiscible with SMA. SBS did not improve the Izod impact strength of SMA appreciably. A prominent synergistic toughening effect was experimentally observed when SBS and MBS were used in combination in brittle SMA. This effect may be attributed to the fact that the large SBS particles initiate crazes and small MBS particles with good adhesion to SMA matrix improve the ligament thickness, which may play a critical role in craze growth and termination. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2260–2267, 2003     

Morphologies and mechanical properties of polylactide blends with medium chain length poly(3‐hydroxyalkanoate) and chemically modified poly(3‐hydroxyalkanoate)

Blends of bacterial poly(3‐hydoroxyalkanoate) (PHA) with a medium‐length side chain and polylactide (PLA), and blends of the chemically modified PHA (ePHA) with PLA, were prepared. The morphologies, some physical properties, and thermal behavior of the blends based on PLA were investigated by electron microscopies, testing machines, and a differential scanning calorimeter, respectively. A blend of uncrystallized rubbery second components, PHA and ePHA, produced an increase in the impact toughness of the PLA blends in contrast to a decrease in the tensile strength value. PHA, especially, with an inserted epoxy group side chain was more effective in improving the morphology and the physical properties than PHA. The ePHA particles existed in the PLA domain as a dispersed phase having a size of 0.1–1 μm. The results of the biodegradation test demonstrated that the PLA blends still maintained their biodegradability and were more accessible to hydrolysis and microbial attack, resulting in a greater weight loss than the pure PLA. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2363–2369, 2004     

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) copolymer on the properties of polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer on the properties of melt blended polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) 80/20 (wt %) composition was studied. In the literature high ductility levels were achieved by melt blending PLA with different additives. However, the gained ductility was counter balanced with drastic drops in strength and modulus values. The novelty of this work was the preparation of PLA‐based blends with polylactide content higher than 75 wt % which showed an impact resistance value improvement of about 60% compared with the neat PLA and maintained similar tensile strength and modulus values as well as glass transition temperature to neat PLA. The addition of only 3 pph of copolymer to PLA/PMMA blend improved the impact resistance almost 100%. The chemical reaction between PLA/PMMA blend and P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer were analyzed by FTIR, rotational rheometry, and GPC/SEC. Phase structure and morphology were studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Scanning Electronic Microscopy. Tensile and impact properties as well as thermal stability were also studied. Results showed that as the amount of copolymer in the blend was increased then higher was average molecular weight and polydispersity index. After the addition of P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer to the PLA/PMMA blend the impact resistance, elongation at break and thermal stability were improved while tensile strength and elastic modulus remained almost unaltered. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43935.     

Morphology,crystalline features,and tensile properties of syndiotactic polypropylene blends

Syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) was modified with ethylene–octene copolymer (EOC) and ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR), with test samples prepared in a twin‐screw extruder and then injection‐molded. The phase morphology, rheology, and thermal and tensile properties of the modified sPP were investigated. Atomic force microscopy studies showed how the phase morphology of the sPP blends with elastomers depended on the blend compositions, and the results compared with the storage modulus at low frequency. EOC and EPR were dispersed phase in an sPP matrix with spherical shapes when the dispersed content was 20 wt % or lower. The phase cocontinuity started around 40 wt % EOC for the sPP–EOC blends and around 60 wt % EPR for the sPP–EPR. The dispersed phase then formed more complex elongated shapes. The rheological and thermal properties were affected by the sPP–elastomer interphase. EOC promoted the crystallization of sPP; this increased the crystallization temperature and rate. In contrast, EPR had the opposite effect on the crystallization behavior, and the results indicate that sPP and EPR were not completely separated. The tensile properties were studied from ?20 to 100 °C. We found that the tensile properties at low temperature could be improved without a loss in high‐temperature properties. In the particular case of 20 wt % EOC, both the strain at yield and strain at break of the sPP–EOC blend were improved at both ?20 and 100 °C. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44611.     

The toughness and morphology of (chlorinated poly[vinyl chloride])/(methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene) blends

A series of methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene (MBS) graft copolymers were synthesized via seeded emulsion polymerization techniques by grafting styrene and methyl methacrylate on poly(butadiene‐co‐styrene) (SBR) particles. The chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) (CPVC)/MBS blends were obtained by melting MBS graft copolymers with CPVC resin, and the effect of the core/shell ratio of MBS graft copolymer and SBR content of CPVC/MBS blends on the mechanical properties and morphology of CPVC/MBS blends was studied. The results showed that, with the increase in the core/shell ratio, the impact strength of the blend increased and then decreased. It was found that, when the core/shell ratio was 50/50, the impact strength was about 155 J/m, and the tensile strength evidently increased. The toughness of the CPVC/MBS blend was closely related to the SBR content of the blend, and with the increasing of SBR content of blend, the impact strength of the blend increased. The morphology of CPVC/MBS blends was observed via scanning electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that the toughness of CPVC/MBS blend was consistence with the dispersion of MBS graft copolymers in the CPVC matrix. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:501–505, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

Melt rheology and interfacial properties of binary and ternary blends of PS,EOC, and SEBS

This works systematically investigates the interfacial properties of the binary and the ternary blends based on polystyrene (PS), ethylene octene copolymer (EOC), and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) by analyzing the melt linear rheological behavior of the blends and neat components. Moreover, the relationship between rheology, phase morphology, and mechanical properties of PS/EOC ternary blends with various quantities of SEBS were studied. The surface shear modulus (β) and interfacial tension values obtained by Palierne model indicated that the EOC/SEBS blend has the best interfacial properties, while the lowest interaction was found for PS/EOC blend. Based on the Palierne model and Harkin's spreading coefficients a core–shell type morphology with EOC phase encapsulated by the SEBS shell dispersed in the PS matrix was determined for the ternary blends. Scanning electron microscopy results revealed that both fibrillar and droplet forms of dispersed phase could be developed during the blending of PS and EOC in presence of SEBS. The extent of fibrillar morphology and interfacial interactions in PS/EOC/SEBS ternary blends was dependent on the SEBS content. The improvement of the mechanical properties of PS/EOC blends in the presence of SEBS was evidenced by the tensile and impact resistance experiments. The tensile strength reinforcement was more pronounced for the ternary blends with more fibrillar dispersed phase. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020 , 137, 48791.     

Effects of the polybutadiene/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) ratio in a polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) impact modifier on the morphology and mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PB‐g‐SAN) impact modifiers with different polybutadiene (PB)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ratios ranging from 20.5/79.5 to 82.7/17.3 were synthesized by seeded emulsion polymerization. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends with a constant rubber concentration of 15 wt % were prepared by the blending of these PB‐g‐SAN copolymers and SAN resin. The influence of the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier on the mechanical behavior and phase morphology of ABS blends was investigated. The mechanical tests showed that the impact strength and yield strength of the ABS blends had their maximum values as the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN copolymer increased. A dynamic mechanical analysis of the ABS blends showed that the glass‐transition temperature of the rubbery phase shifted to a lower temperature, the maximum loss peak height of the rubbery phase increased and then decreased, and the storage modulus of the ABS blends increased with an increase in the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier. The morphological results of the ABS blends showed that the dispersion of rubber particle in the matrix and its internal structure were influenced by the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifiers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2165–2171, 2005     

Toughening of polylactic acid using styrene ethylene butylene styrene: Mechanical,thermal, and morphological studies

Polylactic acid, PLA, derived from renewable resources has gained great attention nowadays owing to their sustainability, biodegradability, superior property, and transparency. However, intrinsic brittleness and low toughness severely limits its variety of applications. Blending of PLA with other polymers is more economical and more flexible technique for the property improvement of PLA. In this study, Styrene Ethylene Butylene Styrene (SEBS) and Maleic Anhydride grafted SEBS (MA‐g‐SEBS) are used as toughening agents to study their effect for its toughness, high strength and heat resistance on PLA. PLA/SEBS and PLA/Maleic Anhydride grafted SEBS blends were prepared under four different compositions by melt mixing technique using a corotating twin–screw extruder after optimizing the mixing conditions. The mechanical properties of the blends such as tensile, flexural, and impact strengths were investigated using specimens prepared by injection molding process. The percentage elongation and impact strength of PLA/MA‐g‐SEBS blends were found to be increased significantly by 540 and 135%, respectively in comparison with virgin PLA and PLA/SEBS blends. However, tensile strength and modulus of PLA/SEBS and PLA/MA‐g‐SEBS blends decreased compared with pristine PLA. SEM behaviour supported the higher impact property of PLA with the incorporation of modified SEBS via multiple crazing and cavitation mechanisms. DSC study also supported greater compatibility between maleated SEBS and PLA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:669–675, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Blends of bisphenol A polycarbonate and rubber‐toughened styrene–maleic anhydride copolymers

The morphology and mechanical properties of polycarbonate (PC) blends with rubber‐toughened styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer materials (TSMA) were investigated and compared with the properties of blends of PC with acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) materials. The PC/TSMA blends showed similar composition dependence of properties as the comparable PC/ABS blends. Polycarbonate blends with TSMA exhibited higher notched Izod impact toughness than pure PC under sharp‐notched conditions but the improvements are somewhat less than observed for similar blends with ABS. Since PC is known for its impact toughness except under sharp‐notched conditions, this represents a significant advantage of the rubber‐modified blends. PC blends with styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) were compared to those with a styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN). The trends in blend morphology and mechanical properties were found to be qualitatively similar for the two types of copolymers. PC/SMA blends are nearly transparent or slightly pearlescent. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1508–1515, 1999     

Reduction of the elongation at break of thermoplastic polyolefins through melt blending with polylactide and the influence of the amount of compatibilizers and the viscosity ratios of the blend components on phase morphology and mechanics

The objective of this work is the synthesis of a polypropylene/ethylene‐propylene‐rubber (TPO)/polylactide (PLA)/compatibilizer (PVM) blend to reduce the elongation at break of TPO by blending TPO with brittle PLA. Three TPO types with different viscosities were melt blended with PLA and an ethylene/n‐butylacrylate/glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer (PVM) as reactive compatibilizer. All blends had a constant PLA amount of 30 wt%. Two parameters were varied in the experiments, viscosity of the TPO types, and amount of PVM used in the blends. Both parameters played important roles in reducing the nominal elongation at break compared to pure TPO foils and influencing the phase morphology of extruded blend foils. The nominal elongation at break could be reduced by 100‐150% through blending TPO with PLA and PVM. Characterization regarding the blend morphology, especially the size and shape of the dispersed PLA phase in the TPO matrix was done by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) images. Investigations of the morphology showed that size and shape of dispersed PLA phases are dependent on the viscosity ratios of the blend components and on the amount of compatibilizer in the blend. AFM images of the polymer blends reveal soft rubbery layers around the dispersed PLA phases. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:905–913, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

SBS and SEBS block copolymers as impact modifiers for polypropylene compounds

Blends of polypropylene (PP) and thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), namely SBS (styrene‐butadiene‐styrene) and SEBS (styrene‐ethylene/1‐butene‐styrene) block copolymers, were prepared to evaluate the effectiveness of the TPE type as an impact modifier for PP and influence of the concentration of elastomer on the polymer properties. Polypropylene homopolymer (PP‐H) and ethylene–propylene random copolymer (PP‐R) were evaluated as the PP matrix. Results showed that TPEs had a nucleating effect that caused the PP crystallization temperature to increase, with SBS being more effective than SEBS. Microstructure characterization tests showed that in most cases PP/SEBS blends showed the smallest rubber droplets regardless of the matrix used. It was seen that SEBS is a more effective toughening agent for PP than SBS. At 0°C the Izod impact strength of the PP‐H/SEBS 30% b/w blend was twofold higher than the SBS strength, with the PP‐R/SEBS 30% b/w blend showing no break. A similar behavior on tensile properties and flexural modulus were observed in both PP/TPE blends. Yield stress and tensile strength decreased and elongation at break increased by expanding the dispersed elastomeric phase in the PP matrix. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 254–263, 2005