Microstructure morphology of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends studied via small angle X‐ray scattering

The microstructure morphology of the poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) (aPET) blends prepared by solution precipitation has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy (POM) and small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). From the observation of POM, it was suggested that aPET was predominantly segregated into the interlamellar and/or interfibrillar regions upon PTT crystallization with the evidence that the PTT spherulitic morphologies of blends were volume filling. From results of SAXS data analysis, the maximum scattering peak (q_max) of Lorentz‐corrected SAXS profiles, amorphous layer thickness (l_a) and lamellar volume stacking fraction (?_s), the segregation morphology of PTT/aPET blends is characterized to be the interlamellar segregation morphology when the weight friction of aPET (w_aPET) ≤ 0.2 and the interlamellar and interfibrillar segregation coexisted when w_aPET > 0.2. The extent of aPET segregation was promoted by increasing aPET composition. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Lamellar Morphology of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Blends Probed by Small Angle X-ray Scattering

The lamellar morphology of a melt-miscible blend consisting of random poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB-co-HV)) copolymer containing 10 mol% HV units and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) prepared by solution casting films have been investigated by means of small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscope (POM). The composition dependence of the amorphous layer thickness (l_a), and the volume fraction of the P(HB-co-HV) lamellar stack (φ_s) revealed that the interfibrillar segregation morphology was generated, where the extent of interfibrillar segregation of PMMA increased with increasing PMMA content. The Lorentz-corrected SAXS profiles of the blends crystallized at T_c=40 ^○C has observed “zero-angle scattering”, attributed to the electron density contrast between the lamellar stack domains consisting of alternating crystalline/amorphous layers and the PMMA-rich domains located outside the lamellar stack domains.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB‐co‐HV))/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends were miscible in the melt over the whole compositions. Thus the blend exhibited a single glass transition temperature (T_g), which increased with increasing PVAc composition. The spherulitic morphologies of P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends indicated that the PVAc was predominantly segregated into P(HB‐co‐HV) interlamellar or interfibrillar regions during P(HB‐co‐HV) crystallization because of the volume‐filled spherulites. As to the crystallization kinetics study, it was found that the overall crystallization and crystal growth rates decreased with the addition of PVAc. The kinetics retardation was primarily attributed to the reduction of chain mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) upon mixing with higher T_g PVAc. The overall crystallization rate was predominantly governed by the spherulitic growth rate and promoted by the samples treated with the quenched state because of the higher nucleation density. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 980–988, 2006     

Segregation morphology of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-10% 3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends as studied via small angle X-ray scattering

Segregation morphology of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB)/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-10% 3-hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB-co-10% HV)/PVAc blends crystallized at 70 °C have been investigated by means of small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Morphological parameters including the crystal thickness (l_c) and the amorphous layer thickness (l_a) were deduced from the one-dimensional correlation function (γ(z)). Blending with PVAc thickened the PHB crystals but not the P(HB-co-10% HV) crystals. On the basis of the composition variation of l_a, and the volume fraction of lamellar stacks (?_s) revealed that PHB/PVAc blends created the interlamellar segregation morphology when the weight fraction of PVAc (w_PVAc)≤0.2 and the interlamellar and interfibrillar segregation coexisted when w_PVAc>0.2, while P(HB-co-10% HV)/PVAc blends yielded the interfibrillar segregation morphology at all blend compositions. For both PHB/PVAc and P(HB-co-10% HV)/PVAc blends, the distance of PVAc segregation was promoted by increasing PVAc composition and the distance of PVAc segregation in P(HB-co-10% HV)/PVAc blends was greater than in PHB/PVAc at a given PVAc composition. The crystal growth rate played a key role in controlling the segregation of PVAc.     

Thermal properties of melt‐blended poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide)

The thermal properties of blends of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by screw extrusion were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. From the thermal analysis of amorphous PEEK–PEI blends which were obtained by quenching in liquid nitrogen, a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and negative excess heat capacities of mixing were observed with the blend composition. These results indicate that there is a favorable interaction between the PEEK and PEI in the blends and that there is miscibility between the two components. From the Lu and Weiss equation and a modified equation from this work, the polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) of the amorphous PEEK–PEI blends was calculated and found to range from −0.058 to −0.196 for the extruded blends with the compositions. The χ₁₂ values calculated from this work appear to be lower than the χ₁₂ values calculated from the Lu and Weiss equation. The χ₁₂ values calculated from the T_g method both ways decreased with increase of the PEI weight fraction. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 733–739, 1999     

Compatibility studies of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)–poly(ether imide)–polycarbonate ternary blends

Binary blends of the sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)–poly(ether imide) (PEI) and SPEEK–polycarbonate (PC), and ternary blends of the SPEEK–PEI–PC, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. SPEEK was obtained by sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone) using 95% sulfuric acid. From the thermal analysis of the SPEEK–PEI blends, single glass transition temperature (T_g) was observed at all the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, double T_gs were observed. From the results of thermal analysis, it is suggested that the SPEEK–PEI blends are miscible and the SPEEK–PC blends are immiscible. Polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) of the SPEEK–PEI blends was calculated from the modified Lu and Weiss equation, and found to range from −0.011 to −0.825 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, the χ₁₂ values were calculated from the modified Flory–Huggins equation, and found to range from 0.191 to 0.272 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PEI–PC ternary blends, phase separation regions that showed two T_gs were found to be consistent with the spinodal curves calculated from the χ₁₂ values of the three binary blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2488–2494, 2000     

Liquid-liquid phase separation and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blend

The liquid-liquid (L-L) phase separation and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ether imide) (PEI) blend were investigated with optical microscopy, light scattering, and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The thermal analysis showed that the concentration fluctuation between separated phases was controllable by changing the time spent for demixing before crystallization. The L-L phase-separated specimens at 130 °C for various time periods were subjected to a temperature-jump of 180 °C for the isothermal crystallization and then effects of L-L phase separation on crystallization were investigated. The crystal growth rate decreased with increasing L-L phase-separated time (t_s). The slow crystallization for a long t_s implied that the growth path of crystals was highly distorted by the rearrangement of the spinodal domains associated with coarsening. The characteristic morphological parameters at the lamellar level were determined by the correlation function analysis on the SAXS data. The blend had a larger amorphous layer thickness than the pure PET, indicating that PEI molecules in the PET-rich phase were incorporated into the interlamellar regions during crystallization.     

Phase segregation behavior in PE/DOP blends and glass‐transition temperatures of polyethylene

Phase segregation behavior in PEs/DOP blends, interactions between PEs and DOP, and glass‐relaxation transitions of PEs were investigated. FTIR, DSC, and TGA data demonstrated that molecular interactions were present between PEs and DOP. DMA data demonstrated that pure PEs each (except HDPE) exhibited two loss maxima at about ?20 and ?120°C but the PEs/DOP blends (including the HDPE/DOP blend) yielded one new loss maximum at about ?60°C. The glass‐relaxation transitions corresponding to the three loss maxima on the DMA curves were designated α (?20°C), β (?60°C), and γ (?120°C) transitions and were attributed to the relaxation of the amorphous phases in the interlamellar, interfibrillar, and interspherulitic regions, respectively, based on DMA, WAXD, SAXS, and POM measurements. The controversial T_g values of PEs and their origin were thus clarified in this study. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3591–3601, 2001     

Spherulite morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends

The spherulite morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(ether imide) (PEI) blends were investigated with optical microscopy (OM), small-angle light scattering (SALS), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Thermal analysis showed that PTT and PEI were miscible in the melt over the entire composition range. The addition of PEI depressed the overall crystallization rate of PTT and affected the texture of spherulites but did not alter the mechanism of crystal growth. When a 50/50 blend was melt-crystallized at 180 °C, the highly birefringent spherulite appeared at the early stage of crystallization (t < 20 min). After longer times, the spherulite of a second form was developed, which exhibited lower birefringence. The SALS results suggested that the observed birefringence change along the radial direction of the spherulite was mainly due to an increase in the orientation fluctuation of the growing crystals as the radius of spherulite increased. The lamellar morphological parameters were evaluated by a one-dimensional correlation function analysis. The amorphous layer thickness showed little dependence on the PEI concentration, indicating that the noncrystallizable PEI component resided primarily in the interfibrillar regions of the growing spherulites.     

Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(lactic acid) blends

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. The blends exhibit single and composition‐dependent glass transition temperature, cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) and melt crystallization peak temperature (T_mc) over the entire composition range, implying miscibility between the PLA and PTT components. The T_cc values of PTT/PLA blends increase, while the T_mc values decrease with increasing PLA content, suggesting that the cold crystallization and melt crystallization of PTT are retarded by the addition of PLA. The modified Avrami model is satisfactory in describing the non‐isothermal melt crystallization of the blends, whereas the Ozawa method is not applicable to the blends. The estimated Avrami exponent of the PTT/PLA blends ranges from 3.25 to 4.11, implying that the non‐isothermal crystallization follows a spherulitic‐like crystal growth combined with a complicated growth form. The PTT/PLA blends generally exhibit inferior crystallization rate and superior activation energy compared to pure PTT at the same cooling rate. The greater the PLA content in the PTT/PLA blends, the lower the crystallization rate and the higher the activation energy. Moreover, the introduction of PTT into PLA leads to an increase in the thermal stability behavior of the resulting PTT/PLA blends. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Melting,crystallization behaviors,and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET/PTT/PBT ternary blends

The melting, crystallization behaviors, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the ternary blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(buthylene terephthalate) (PBT) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). PBT content in all ternary blends was settled invariably to be one‐third, which improved the melt‐crystallization temperature of the ternary blends. All of the blend compositions in amorphous state were miscible as evidenced by a single, composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) observed in DSC curves. DSC melting thermograms of different blends showed different multiple melting and crystallization peaks because of their various polymer contents. During melt‐crystallization process, three components in blends crystallized simultaneously to form mixed crystals or separated crystals depending upon their content ratio. The Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the Ozawa theory were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of two selected ternary blends. The results spoke that the Avrami equation was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization process of the ternary blends. The values of the t_1/2 and the parameters Z_c showed that the crystallization rate of the ternary blends with more poly(ethylene terephthalate) content was faster than that with the lesser one at a given cooling rate. The crystal morphology of the five ternary blends investigated by polarized optical microscopy (POM) showed different size and distortional Maltese crosses or light spots when the PTT or poly(ethylene terephthalate) component varied, suggesting that the more the PTT content, the larger crystallites formed in ternary blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Lamellar Morphology of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/Poly(ethylene oxide) Blends as Studied via Small Angle X-ray Scattering

The lamellar morphology of a melt-miscible blend consisting of two crystalline constituents, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) have been investigated by means of small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The blend was a crystalline/amorphous system when temperatures lay between the melting point of PEO (ca. T _m ^PEO=60C) and that of PHB (ca. T _m ^PHB=170C), while it became a crystalline/crystalline system below T _m ^PEO. The crystalline microstructures of the blends were induced by two types of crystallization history, i.e. one-step and two-step crystallizations. In the one-step crystallization, the blends were directly quenched from the melt to room temperature to allow simultaneous PHB and PEO crystallization. The two-step crystallization involved first cooling to 70C to allow PHB crystallization for 72 h followed by cooling to room temperature (ca. 19C) to allow PEO crystallization. In the crystalline/crystalline state, two scattering peaks have been observed in the Lorentz-corrected SAXS profiles, irrespective of the crystallization histories, meaning that crystallization created separate PHB and PEO lamellar stack domains. One-step crystallization yielded lamellar stack domains containing almost pure PHB and PEO lamellae. Two-step crystallization generated almost pure PHB lamellar domains and the PEO lamellar domains with inserted PHB lamellae. In the crystalline/amorphous state, the composition dependence of the amorphous layer thickness (l _a), the presence of zero-angle scattering, and the volume fraction of the PHB lamellar stack (_s) revealed that both one-step and two-step crystallizations, generated the interfibrillar segregation morphology, where the extent of interfibrillar segregation of amorphous PEO increased with increasing PEO content.     

Isotactic polypropylene/polymethylmethacrylate blends: Effects of addition of propylene-graft-methylmethacrylate copolymer

A novel graft copolymer of unsaturated propylene with methyl methacrylate (uPP-g-PMMA) was added to binary blends of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA) with a view to using such a copolymer as a compatibilizer for iPP/aPMMA materials. Optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy, wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques showed that, contrary to expectation, the uPP-g-PMMA addition does not provide iPP/aPMMA compatibilized materials, irrespective of composition. As a matter of fact the degree of dispersion of the minor component achieved following the addition of uPP-g-PMMA copolymer remained quite comparable to that exhibited by binary blends of iPP and aPMMA with no relevant evidence of adhesion or interconnection between the phases. On the other hand the crystalline texture was deeply modified by the copolymer presence. With increasing uPP-g-PMMA content (w/w) the iPP spherulites were found to become more open and coarse and the dimensions and number per unit area of the amorphous interspherulitic contact regions were found to increase. According to such OM results the copolymer uncrystallizable sequences were assumed to be mainly located in interfibrillar and interspherulitic amorphous contact regions. SAXS analysis demonstrated that the phase structure developed in the iPP/aPMMA/uPP-g-PMMA blends is characterized by values of the long period increasing linearly with increasing copolymer content (w/w). Assuming a two phase model for the iPP spherulite fibrillae, constituted of alternating parallel crystalline lamellae and amorphous layers, the lamellar structure of the iPP phase in the ternary blends is characterized by crystalline lamellar thickness (L_c) and an interlamellar amorphous layer (L_a) higher than that shown by plain iPP and L_c and L_a values both increased with increasing uPP-g-PMMA content (w/w). Such SAXS results have been accounted for by assuming that a cocrystallization phenomenon between propylenic sequences of the uPP-g-PMMA copolymer and iPP occurs. The development of the iPP lamellar structure in the iPP/aPMMA/uPP-g-PMMA blends was thus modeled hypothesizing that during such a cocrystallization process copolymer PMMA chains with comparatively lower molecular mass remain entrapped into the iPP interlamellar amorphous layer forming their own domains. Moreover, evidence of strong correlations between the crystallization process of the uPP-g-PMMA copolymer and the iPP crystallization process was shown also by differential scanning calorimetry and WAXS experiments. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 2377–2393, 1997     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends

The crystallization kinetics of a melt‐miscible blend, consisting of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by solution precipitation, has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy and differential scanning calorimeter. It was found that both the PTT spherulitic growth rate (G) and overall crystallization rate constant (k_n) were depressed, with increasing PEI composition or crystallization temperature (T_c). The kinetic retardation was attributed to the decrease in PTT molecular mobility, and the dilution of PTT concentration due to the addition of PEI, which has a higher glass transition temperature (T_g). According to the Lauritzen–Hoffman theory of secondary nucleation, the crystallization of PTT in blends was similar to that of neat PTT as regime III, n = 4 and regime II, n = 2 growth processes, while the transition point of regime III to II has been shifted from 194°C for neat PTT to 190°C for blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:89–96, 2006. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Porous biodegradable polyesters. I. Preparation of porous poly(L‐lactide) films by extraction of poly(ethylene oxide) from their blends

Porous poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) films were prepared by water extraction of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) from solution‐cast PLLA and PEO blend films. The dependence of blend ratio and molecular weight of PEO on the porosity and pore size of films was investigated by gravimetry and scanning electron microscopy. The film porosity and extracted weight ratio were in good agreement with the expected for porous films prepared using PEO of low molecular weight (M_w = 1 × 10³), but shifted to lower values than expected when high molecular weight PEO (M_w = 1 × 10⁵) was utilized. The maximum pore size was larger for porous films prepared from PEO having higher molecular weight, when compared at the same blending ratio of PLLA and PEO before water extraction. Differential scanning calorimetry of as‐cast PLLA and PEO blend films revealed that PLLA and PEO were phase‐separated at least after solvent evaporation. On the other hand, comparison of blend films before and after extraction suggested that a small amount of PEO was trapped in the amorphous region between PLLA crystallites even after water extraction and hindered PLLA crystallization during solvent evaporation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 629–637, 2000     

Amorphous phase and crystalline morphology in blend of two polymorphic polyesters: Poly(hexamethylene terephthalate) and poly(heptamethylene terephthalate)

Crystalline/crystalline blends of two polymorphic aryl-polyesters, poly(hexamethylene terephthalate) (PHT) and poly(heptamethylene terephthalate) (PHepT), were prepared and the crystallization kinetics, polymorphism behavior, spherulite morphology, and miscibility in this blend system were probed using polarized-light optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), temperature-resolved wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The PHT/PHepT blends of all compositions were proven to be miscible in the melt state or quenched amorphous glassy phase. Miscibility in PHT/PHepT blend leads to the retardation in the crystallization rate of PHT; however, that of PHepT increases, being attributed to the nucleation effects of PHT crystals which are produced before the growth of PHepT crystals. In the miscible blend of polymorphic PHT with polymorphic PHepT, the polymorphism states of both PHT and PHepT in the blend are influenced by the other component. The fraction of the thermodynamically stable β-crystal of PHT in the blend increases with increasing PHepT content when melt-crystallized at 100 °C. In addition, when blended with PHT, the crystal stability of PHepT is altered and leads to that the originally polymorphic PHepT exhibits only the β-crystal when melt-crystallized at all T_c's. Apart from the noted polymorphism behavior, miscibility in the blend also shows great influence on the spherulite morphology of PHT crystallized at 100 °C, in which the dendritic morphology corresponding to the β-crystal of PHT changes to the ring-banded in the blend with higher than 50 wt% PHepT. In blends of PHT/PHepT one-step crystallized at 60 °C, PHepT is located in both PHT interlamellar and interfibrillar region analyzed using SAXS, which further manifests the miscibility between PHT and PHepT.     

Polymer blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers

The compatibilizing effects of styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymers with various glycidyl methyacrylate (GMA) contents on immiscible blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and polystyrene (PS) were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ¹³C‐solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The epoxy functional groups in the SG copolymer were able to react with the PTT end groups (? COOH or ? OH) to form SG‐g‐PTT copolymers during melt processing. These in situ–formed graft copolymers tended to reside along the interface to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interfacial adhesion. The compatibilized PTT/PS blend possessed a smaller phase domain, higher viscosity, and better tensile properties than did the corresponding uncompatibilized blend. For all compositions, about 5% GMA in SG copolymer was found to be the optimum content to produce the best compatibilization of the blend. This study demonstrated that SG copolymers can be used efficiently in compatibilizing polymer blends of PTT and PS. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2247–2252, 2003     

Miscibility and phase structure of binary blends of poly(L‐lactide) and poly(vinyl alcohol)

Blend films of poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) were obtained by evaporation of hexafluoroisopropanol solutions of both components. The component interaction, crystallization behavior, and miscibility of these blends were studied by solid‐state NMR and other conventional methods, such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). The existence of two series of isolated and constant glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) independent of the blend composition indicates that PLLA and PVA are immiscible in the amorphous region. However, the DSC data still demonstrates that some degree of compatibility related to blend composition exists in both PLLA/atactic‐PVA (a‐PVA) and PLLA/syndiotactic‐PVA (s‐PVA) blend systems. Furthermore, the formation of interpolymer hydrogen bonding in the amorphous region, which is regarded as the driving force leading to some degree of component compatibility in these immiscible systems, is confirmed by FTIR and further analyzed by ¹³C solid‐state NMR analyses, especially for the blends with low PLLA contents. Although the crystallization kinetics of one component (especially PVA) were affected by another component, WAXD measurement shows that these blends still possess two isolated crystalline PLLA and PVA phases other than the so‐called cocrystalline phase. ¹³C solid‐state NMR analysis excludes the interpolymer hydrogen bonding in the crystalline region. The mechanical properties (tensile strength and elongation at break) of blend films are consistent with the immiscible but somewhat compatible nature of these blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 762–772, 2001     

Phase and crystallization behavior of solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide)

Results on solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) blends are reported. Dichloroacetic acid was used as the cosolvent for blending. PEEK and PEI are confirmed to be miscible in the melt. The glass transition, T_g, behavior obeys the simple Fox equation or the Gordon-Taylor equation with the adjustable coefficient k = 0.86. This agrees with prior data on melt-blended PEEK/PEI blends. The T_g width of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends was found to be broader than that of the pure components. The maximum broadening is about 10°C. The specific volume of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends shows a slight negative deviation from linearity, indicating favorable interaction between PEEK and PEI. The spherulitic growth and resultant blend morphology at 270°C were studied by a cross-polarized optical microscope. The radial growth rate of PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible melt at 270°C decreases from 3.04 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 90/10 blend to 0.77 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 70/30 blend. The decrease in crystalization rate of PEEK from PEEK/PEI blends is attributable to the increase in blend T_g. A linear growth was observed for PEEK spherulites formed from miscible melt at 270°C in the early growth stage. The spherulitic growth deviated from linearity in the late stage of growth. PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible PEEK/PEI melt at 270°C are essentially volume-filling. The branches of the spherulites become more clear for PEEK spherulites formed from the blend than that formed from pure PEEK melt.