Isolation of human intestinal defensins from ileal neobladder urine

Restenosis is a major limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In this study, we assessed the impact of restenosis on PTCA with reference to coronary angioplasty bypass grafting (CABG). In the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation (CABRI) PTCA population, those who had restenosis were defined as those needing a second revascularization at a site revascularized at the initial procedure. The 1-year clinical outcome of the nonrestenotic group (n=437) was compared with those who underwent CABG (n=453). There was no difference in deaths. In the nonrestenotic PTCA group, the incidence of more infarctions was insignificant (relative risk [RR] 1.9, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.96 to 3.75, p=0.064), there was a much greater need for repeat revascularization (RR 8.6, CI 5.14 to 14.41, p <0.0005), and patients had a poorer angina status (RR 1.46, CI 1.01 to 2.13, p=0.046). Using 2 measures of coronary disease, the degree of pre- and postrevascularization disease was compared between groups. There were no differences in prerevascularization disease. However, using either measure, residual postrevascularization disease was more frequent in the nonrestenotic PTCA group. Restenosis only partially accounts for the greater morbidity seen after PTCA, compared with CABG, in multivessel disease. The greater likelihood of residual disease post-PTCA may contribute to this greater morbidity.     

Diagnosing left lower lobe pneumonia: usefulness of the ''spine sign'' on lateral chest radiographs

Percutaneous cardiopulmonary assist devices (PCPS) have become available in interventional cardiology within recent years. These tools offer the opportunity of performing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in high-risk patients characterized by significant stenoses of several coronary arteries and a poor left ventricular function. It is unclear for which patients PCPS are necessary and which patients will profit by PTCA as compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, the anticipated risk of CABG and of PTCA without assist devices was calculated according to risk scores and compared with our results of assisted PTCA. In addition the long-term survival rate was investigated. In 35 patients (mean 65.5 years of age, 12 females, 23 males), we performed PTCA concomitant with the use of cardiac assist devices. The indications for the use of a cardiac assist device were severely impaired LV function (EF 30% +/- 8.9%) in combination with significant coronary artery disease (2.7 +/- 0.3 vessels) and a significant supply area of the vessel to be dilated. In 6 patients, PCPS was started before coronary angioplasty because of hemodynamic instability. In 21 cases, PCPS was on a standby basis without being connected to the patient's circulation. In 8 patients, a left heart assist device, the 14F-Hemopump, was inserted percutaneously. The patients were analyzed using risk scores of angioplasty and of coronary bypass graft surgery. The calculated risk of hemodynamic compromise during PTCA according to the risk scores was more than 50%. The anticipated risk of a fatal outcome following CABG would have been 19.8%. PTCA was performed on an average of 2.0 coronary arteries per patient and was successful in 85%. We observed a decline in angina pectoris classification (CCS) from 3.5 to 1.6. An average reduction of 1.1 NYHA class was achieved. The in-hospital mortality was 8.6% (3 patients: 1 x sepsis, 1 x early reocclusion, 1 x cerebral embolism). At 24 months follow-up, a re-PTCA was necessary in four cases because of restenosis. In the remainder, NYHA and CCS class were stable during the follow-up period. An additional five patients died during the first year and two patients in the second year. We conclude that PTCA with the use of a cardiac assist device shows favorable short-term results in a subset of patients with extended coronary artery disease and severely impaired LV function who are not suitable for nonsupported PTCA or CABG due to their risk profile. However, the long term results are not satisfying and stress the need for complete revascularisation with CABG once the patient's condition is stabilized by means of supported PTCA.     

Results of directional coronary atherectomy in Northern New England. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

The role of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in interventional cardiology remains uncertain. We report the Northern New England regional experience with DCA from 1991 to 1994. Data were collected on 11,178 patients having had an intervention on a single lesion in a single vessel (798 DCAs; 10,380 percutaneous transluminal angioplasties [PTCA]). The use of DCA increased from 1.8% of interventions in 1991 to 10% in 1994. Compared with PTCA, DCA patients were younger, more often men, had more 1-vessel disease and more coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). DCA was more often used in the left anterior descending artery, in vein grafts, for restenoses, for subtotal occlusions, and with type A lesions. Angiographic success (96.7%) and clinical success (93%) were good. Adverse events were rare: mortality 0.9%, emergent CABG 2.2%, nonfatal myocardial infarction 2.8%. After adjusting for case-mix, there was no difference between DCA and PTCA for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 2.43, p = 0.95) or need for emergent CABG (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.10, p = 0.34). Atherectomy patients were more likely to have a nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.20, p <0.01), to sustain an injury to the femoral or brachial artery (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.51, p <0.01), and to have a clinically successful procedure (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.88, p = 0.05). Our results support the relative safety and effectiveness of DCA as its use disseminated into the region.     

Immobilization of domestic goats (Capra hircus) using orally administered carfentanil citrate and detomidine hydrochloride

A total of 147 stents were implanted (in overlapping manner in 76% of vessels) in a single coronary artery in 59 patients (60 vessels, 97 lesions, 2.45 stents/vessel) over a period of 18 mo using high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance. The indications for stenting were suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) result (45%), primary prevention of restenosis (44%), acute closure (10%), and restenosis after plain balloon angioplasty (1%). One patient required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (extensive dissection), and one required early intervention with plain balloon angioplasty and intracoronary urokinase for stent thrombosis. There were no deaths. Thirteen patients had recurrence of angina within 6 mo and angiograms were performed in all. These showed intrastent restenosis in nine (all had successful repeat plain balloon angioplasty), development of new disease in other vessels along with restenosis close to the stent in the target vessel in one (underwent elective CABG) and normal angiograms with widely patent stents in three. Forty-five patients (77%) remained free of recurrent angina and 25 of these had follow-up angiograms (56%) at a mean of 172 days, two showing restenosis. Thus, the restenosis rate per patient in the symptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 100%) was 77% and in the asymptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 56%) was 8%. The restenosis rate in the subgroup with bailout stenting (n = 6) was 20% (angiographic follow-up in 83%). The overall restenosis rate per patient was 32% (overall angiographic follow-up in 66%). During the 6-mo follow-up period, one patient underwent elective CABG (1.7%), one sustained a non-Q myocardial infarction (1.7%), nine had repeat PTCA to the target vessel (15.5%), and there were no deaths. The event-free survival rate was 77%. Multiple stent implantation aided by high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance and with adjunctive optimal antiplatelet therapy without oral anticoagulation seems to be a useful and effective revascularisation strategy to deal with long lesions and acute dissections with a high procedural success rate. The restenosis rate is acceptable and is not appreciably high as reported in previous studies from the "warfarin era."     

Danish multicenter randomized study of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with inducible ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (DANAMI). DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: The aim of the DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI) study was to compare an invasive strategy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a conservative strategy in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia who received thrombolytic treatment for a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 503 patients randomized to an invasive strategy, PTCA was performed in 266 (52.9%) and CABG in 147 (29.2%) from 2 to 10 weeks after the AMI. Of the 505 patients in the conservative treatment group, only 8 (1.6%) had been revascularized 2 months after the AMI. The patients were followed up from 1 to 4.5 years. The primary end points were mortality, reinfarction, and admission with unstable angina. At 2.4 years' follow-up (median), mortality was 3.6% in the invasive treatment group and 4.4% in the conservative treatment group (not significant). Invasive treatment was associated with a lower incidence of AMI (5.6% versus 10.5%; P=.0038) and a lower incidence of admission for unstable angina (17.9% versus 29.5%; P<.00001). The percentages of patients with a primary end point were 15.4% and 29.5% at 1 year, 23.5% and 36.6% at 2 years, and 31.7% versus 44.0% at 4 years (P=<.00001) in the invasive and conservative treatment groups, respectively. At 12 months, stable angina pectoris was present in 21% of patients in the invasive treatment group and 43% in the conservative treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive treatment in post-AMI patients with inducible ischemia results in a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction, fewer admissions due to unstable angina, and lower prevalence of stable angina. We conclude that patients with inducible ischemia before discharge who have received treatment with thrombolytic drugs for their first AMI should be referred to coronary arteriography and revascularized accordingly.     

Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine the relative risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Due to an expanding population of patients with surgically treated coronary artery disease and the natural progression of atherosclerosis, an increasing number of patients with previous CABG require repeat revascularization procedures. Although there are randomized comparative data for CABG versus medical therapy and, more recently, versus PTCA, these studies have excluded patients with previous CABG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 632 patients with previous CABG who required either elective re-CABG (n = 164) or PTCA (n = 468) at a single center during 1987 through 1988. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (83% vs. 85% male), age > 70 years (21% vs. 23%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (46% vs. 48%), presence of class III or IV angina (70% vs. 63%) and three-vessel coronary artery disease (77% vs. 74%). RESULTS: Complete revascularization was achieved in 38% of patients with PTCA and 92% of those with re-CABG (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital complication rates were significantly lower in the PTCA group: death (0.3% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.0001) and Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) (0.9% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival was equivalent at 1 year (PTCA 95% vs. re-CABG 91%) and 6 years (PTCA 74% vs. re-CABG 73%) of follow-up (p = 0.32). Both procedures resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, or both, by 6 years was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 64% vs. re-CABG 8%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, unstable angina, number of diseased vessels and diabetes mellitus as independent correlates of mortality for the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized series of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization, an initial stategy of either PTCA or re-CABG resulted in equivalent overall survival, event-free survival and relief of angina. PTCA offers lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks, although it is associated with less complete revascularization and a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Myocardial revascularisation in elderly patients with refractory or unstable angina and advanced coronary disease

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with ischaemic heart disease are often treated more conservatively and for longer than younger patients, but this strategy may result in subsequent invasive intervention of more advanced and higher risk coronary disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 109 patients aged > or = 70 years (mean age 74 years, 66% men), who presented with angina refractory to maximal medical treatment or unstable angina over a 2-year period (1988-1990), to compare the relative risks and benefits of myocardial revascularisation [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)] in this higher-risk age group. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent CABG and 49 patients PTCA. There were eight periprocedural deaths in total (six in the CABG group, and two in the PTCA group, P = 0.29). Six patients in the CABG group suffered a cerebrovascular accident (two fatal). Acute Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in one patient in the CABG group and in two patients in the PTCA group. The length of hospital stay was longer for the CABG group (CABG group 11.4 +/- 5.4 days, range 7-30 days, PTCA group 7.4 +/- 7.6 days, range 1-39 days, P = 0.01). Outcome was assessed using the major cardiac event rate (MACE; i.e. the rate of death, myocardial infarction, repeat CABG or PTCA). The cumulative event-free survival in the CABG group in 1, 2 and 3 years was 87, 85 and 85%, respectively. In contrast, in the PTCA group it was 55, 48 and 48% (P = 0.0001). Age, sex, number of diseased vessels, degree of revascularisation and left ventricular function were not predictive of the recurrence of angina in both groups. Actuarial survival (total mortality, including perioperative mortality) was lower at 1 year in the CABG group due to the higher perioperative mortality, but similar in both groups after the second year (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with refractory or unstable angina who are revascularised surgically have a better long-term outcome (less frequent event rate of the composite end-point--myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures and death) compared with those who are revascularised with PTCA. This benefit is been realised after the second year. Total mortality is similar in both groups after the second year. Therefore elderly patients who are fit for surgery should not be denied the benefits of CABG. PTCA may be regarded as a complementary and satisfactory treatment, especially for those whose life expectancy is limited to less than 2 years. The use of stents may improve outcome in the PTCA group and this needs to be evaluated.     

Cortical influences on cervical motoneurons in the rat: recordings of synaptic responses from motoneurons and compound action potential from corticospinal axons

Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty (PTCA) occurs in 25-35% of all procedures. To date, most pharmacologic strategies have failed to reduce the restenosis rate significantly. However, recent studies have suggested a potential benefit of dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) on restenosis following PTCA. The benefit of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the incidence of coronary artery restenosis following elective PTCA was assessed in 212 consecutive patients (41 female, 171 male). Following a successful angioplasty, 204 patients received a dietary supplementation with either nine capsules containing fish oil (3.15 g omega-3 fatty acids) or nine placebo capsules containing olive oil. Treatment was started immediately after PTCA and maintained over 4 mon. Compliance was assessed by analysis of lipid fatty acids prior to angioplasty and at 4 mon follow-up. The angiographically determined incidence of restenosis (stenosis diameter > 50%) was 31.2% per lesion in patients receiving fish oil and 33.7% in patients receiving olive oil. Gross progression of coronary artery disease in vessels not subjected to angioplasty was 17% and 16%, respectively. In conclusion, low dose fish oil supplementation begun on the day of a successful coronary angioplasty failed to demonstrate any effect on coronary artery restenosis.     

Revascularization in patients with prior coronary bypass surgery

Increasingly over the past several years, patients have returned after coronary surgery for reintervention procedures. This reflects immediate postsurgical complications and the relentless progression of coronary artery disease in the native circulation and in the bypass grafts. Although there are randomized comparative data for coronary bypass surgery (CABG) versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and medical therapy, these trials have always excluded patients with previous (GABG). OBJECTIVES: We attempted to compare the risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examines follow up data (15.4 +/- 11.0 months) from 130 patients with previous CABG, who required either PTCA (Group A, n = 73) or re-CABG (Group B; n = 57) at a single center from 1994 to 1997. Follow up data were obtained from subsequent office visits and telephone calls. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (86% vs 94% males), mean age (62 +/- 9 vs 59 +/- 10 years), angina CCS classes 3 and 4 (73% vs 69%), diminished left ventricular function (23% vs 26%), risk factors such as diabetes (19% vs 17%), hypercolesterolemia (49% vs 45%) and smoking (48% vs 39%) and three-vessel native coronary artery disease (67% vs 72%). The symptomatic status prior to the revascularization procedure was similar in both groups. Complete and functional revascularization was achieved in 85% of the PTCA group and in 92% of those with re-CABG (p = NS). During the hospital stay the complication rates were lower in the PTCA group. Actuarial survival was different at follow up (p = 0.04). Both PTCA and re-CABG groups resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina and urgent revascularization). The need for repeat revascularization at follow up was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 28% vs re-CABG 10%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized study of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization procedures, PTCA resulted in lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks. At follow up, both PTCA or CABG were similar for event-free survival; PTCA offered lower overall mortality, although it is associated to a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Heart interventions in Switzerland 1996

For the year 1996, as for the previous 11 years, a survey of cardiac invasive and surgical procedures in Switzerland was carried out by a standardised questionnaire. At the 25 Swiss centres (10 public non-university, 10 private and 5 university centres) a total of 12,183 coronary revascularisation procedures were performed, 60% by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Of all PTCAs, 88% were single vessel interventions. PTCA for ongoing infarction accounted for 6% of all PTCAs. The use of coronary stents has increased to 50% of all angioplasties. Other interventions like directional atherectomy and rotablations have lost ground (0.4%, 35 cases). Only 22 interventions (0.2%) with intracoronary laser devices were recorded. Among the new diagnostic tools, only coronary ultrasound (233 cases) and Flowire (147) have been used regularly. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasties (60 cases) and catheter closure of congenital shunt defects (42 cases) remained rare. Procedure related mortality for PTCA was 0.6%, infarction occurred in 1.0% and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) became necessary in 0.4%. The total number of CABGs (4,463) slightly decreased. Among the 2,677 non-coronary operations, 48% were performed for valve disease and 51% for congenital heart disease. Heart transplantation was performed in 41 patients (1%). Half of the interventional catheter procedures were performed at the 5 university centres whereas the majority of CABGs were carried out at private centres. Four centres performed diagnostic procedures, exclusively. In-house surgical stand-by for PTCA was available in 17 of the 21 interventional centres.     

A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare stenting of the primary infarct-related artery (IRA) with optimal primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with respect to clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with an acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Early and late restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA after successful primary PTCA significantly contributes to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Coronary stenting results in a lower rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis than standard PTCA in patients with angina and with previously untreated, noncomplex lesions. METHODS: After successful primary PTCA, 150 patients were randomly assigned to elective stenting or no further intervention. The primary end point of the trial was a composite end point, defined as death, reinfarction or repeat target vessel revascularization as a consequence of recurrent ischemia within 6 months of randomization. The secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis or reocclusion at 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: Stenting of the IRA was successful in all patients randomized to stent treatment. At 6 months, the incidence of the primary end point was 9% in the stent group and 28% in the PTCA group (p=0.003); the incidence of restenosis or reocclusion was 17% in the stent group and 43% in the PTCA group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of the IRA, compared with optimal primary angioplasty, results in a lower rate of major adverse events related to recurrent ischemia and a lower rate of angiographically detected restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA.     

Evaluation of indications for PTCA

Rating the indications for invasive cardiac procedures often is regarded as one key method for quality assessment in cardiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the method proposed by the RAND Corporation and the University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness and necessity rating. Two hypotheses were tested: 1. The acute and long-term benefit of PTCA is less clearly in cases rated "uncertain" than in cases rated "appropriate" or "necessary", and 2. in cases rated "necessary", successful PTCA improves the patients long-term prognosis, since RAND's definition of "necessary" implies that a successful PTCA will avert major harm from this patient. PATIENTS: Five hundred and one consecutive patients dilated between 1981 and 1984 were included. Baseline data: Age 52.5 +/- 8.2 years, male gender 87.0%, Canadian Heart Classification (CHC) class I or II 40.5%, positive and extremely positive stress test 54.4% and 33.3%, single vessel disease 72.5%. The long-term follow-up was determined by questionnaire 91 +/- 21 months after PTCA, and a complete 5-year follow-up was available in 95.4% of all patients. RESULTS: According to RAND's 1991 published criteria, 1.0% of all indications were rated "inappropriate", 21.4% "uncertain", 27.1% "appropriate", and 50.5% "necessary". Before PTCA, patients rated "uncertain" were less symptomatic and had a higher exercise capacity than patients rated "necessary" (CHC I or II: 85.0% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001; 693 +/- 214 vs. 520 +/- 251 watts*min, p < 0.001). Following PTCA, "uncertain" patients reported less often a lasting symptomatic improvement or freedom of symptoms than "necessary" patients (63.9% vs. 76.3%, p = n.s.), and they experienced no relevant improvement in exercise capacity (10 +/- 263 vs. 139 +/- 308 watts*min, p < 0.05). The acute success rate was significantly lower for patients who underwent PTCA for indications rated "revascularization necessary" or "CABG necessary", p < 0.03. This resulted in a high rate of CABG within the first year for patients with these rating (29.0% and 36.1%, compared to 15.0% to 20.6% in cases rated "uncertain", "appropriate", or "PTCA necessary", p < 0.02). Only in patients with the rating "PTCA necessary" (n = 184), a significant difference in long-term survival was observed between successful and unsuccessful uncomplicated cases (5-year-survival-probability 97.8 +/- 1.3% vs. 85.5 +/- 6.0%, p < 0.001). In contrast, "uncertain" cases (n = 107) had a 5-year-survival-probability of 94.8 +/- 2.5% following successful and 94.4 +/- 5.4% following unsuccessful PTCA. CONCLUSION: These results are in agreement with both hypotheses and therefore support the validity of RAND's 1991 appropriateness and necessity criteria for PTCA in a historic series of patients. Thus, even if these particular ratings may be outdated today, the technique of appropriateness and necessity rating is expected to be a useful and valid tool for quality assessment in PTCA.     

Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both effective intervention strategies for patients with coronary heart disease. We report comparative long-term clinical and health-service cost findings for these interventions in the first Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-1) trial. METHODS: 1011 patients with coronary heart disease (45% single-vessel, 55% multivessel) were randomly assigned initial treatment strategies of PTCA or CABG. Information on clinical events, subsequent intervention, symptomatic status, exercise testing, and use of health-care resources is available for a median 6.5 years of follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The predefined primary endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 87 (17%) PTCA-group patients and 80 (16%) CABG-group patients (p=0.64). Similarly, there was no significant treatment difference in deaths alone (39 PTCA, 45 CABG), of which 46% were cardiac related. In both groups, the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was more than five times higher in the first year than in subsequent years of follow-up. 26% of patients assigned PTCA subsequently also had CABG, and a further 19% required additional nonrandomised PTCA. Most of these reinterventions occurred within a year of randomisation, and from 3 years onwards the reintervention rate averaged 4% per year. In the CABG group the reintervention rate averaged 2% per year. The prevalence of angina was consistently higher in the PTCA group, with an absolute average 10% excess compared with the CABG group (p<0.001). Total health-service costs over 5 years showed no significant difference between initial strategies of PTCA and CABG (mean difference pounds sterling 426 [95% Cl -pounds sterling 383 to pounds sterling 1235]; p=0.30). The clinical and cost comparisons showed similar patterns for patients with single-vessel and multivessel disease. INTERPRETATION: Initial strategies of PTCA and CABG led to similar long-term results in terms of survival and avoidance of myocardial infarction and to similar long-term health-care costs. Choice of approach, therefore, rests on weighing the more invasive nature of CABG against the greater risk of recurrent angina and reintervention over many years after PTCA.     

Effect of coronary angioplasty on precordial QT dispersion

Dispersion of the QT interval is a measure of inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization. Because ischemia is associated with regional abnormalities of conduction and repolarization, we hypothesized that the surface electrocardiographic interval dispersion would increase in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease in the absence of myocardial infarction and that successful revascularization would reduce QT interval dispersion. Thirty-seven consecutive patients with ischemia due to 1-vessel coronary artery disease without prior myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were evaluated. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were performed 24 hours before, 24 hours after, and late (>2 months) after PTCA. Precordial QT interval dispersions were determined from differences in the maximum and minimum corrected QT intervals. Mean QT interval dispersion before PTCA was 60 +/- 9 ms, immediately after PTCA 23 +/- 14 ms (p <0.001), and late after PTCA 29 +/- 18 ms (p <0.001 vs before PTCA). The shortest precordial QT interval increased immediately after PTCA (367 +/- 40 vs 391 +/- 39 ms; p <0.02) and then remained stable late after PTCA (376 +/- 36 ms, p = NS vs immediately after PTCA). Symptomatic recurrent ischemia in 8 patients with documented restenosis increased QT interval dispersion (56 +/- 15 ms [p <0.01] vs 25 +/- 14 ms immediately after PTCA), which decreased again after successful repeat PTCA (22 +/- 13 ms [p <0.01] vs before the second PTCA). QT interval dispersion decreases after successful coronary artery revascularization and increases with restenosis. Therefore, QT interval dispersion may be a marker of recurrent ischemia due to restenosis after PTCA.     

One-year outcomes of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Risk factors and outcomes associated with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetics and nondiabetics were analyzed for 376 consecutive patients, 77 with diabetes (20%) and 299 nondiabetics (80%), who had non-Q-wave MI and had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed before discharge from hospital during the period from January 1992 to February 1996. Diabetics were slightly older (64 +/- 10 years vs 61 +/- 12 years, p <0.053), had more prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (27% vs 12%, p <0.001), and hypertension (77% vs 49%, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in unstable angina, saphenous vein graft PTCA, single versus multiple vessel disease, or history of MI. PTCA success rates for diabetics versus nondiabetics were similar (96% vs 97%, p = NS). In-hospital complications such CABG, recurrent MI, repeat PTCA, stroke, and death were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, survival in diabetics (92%) was similar to nondiabetics (94%, p = NS), although event-free survival (PTCA, CABG, MI, death) was worse in diabetics (55% vs 67% for nondiabetics, p <0.05). Although diabetic patients with non-Q-wave MI represent a cohort with more risk factors for poor outcome, aggressive in-hospital revascularization with PTCA results in an excellent short-term outcome as well as 1-year survival similar to the nondiabetic patients. However, total events at 1-year follow-up are more common in the diabetic patients, suggesting that more aggressive screening and therapy in follow-up may be warranted, and that a diabetic with non-Q-wave MI will require increased utilization of cardiovascular resources in the first year after the event.     

Optimal burr and adjunctive balloon sizing reduces the need for target artery revascularization after coronary mechanical rotational atherectomy

We analyzed the effect of differing burr and balloon sizes during mechanical rotational atherectomy on the need for target vessel revascularization at 6 months. The ideal burr/artery ratio and adjunctive balloon/artery ratio for optimizing acute luminal results and minimizing restenosis is unknown. Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained in 311 patients (339 lesions) treated with rotational atherectomy from August 1993 to September 1994, to determine whether procedural results or technique were related to the need for target vessel revascularization. Target vessel revascularization, defined as repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery within 6 months after rotational atherectomy, occurred in 19% of patients. Larger burr/artery ratios, defined as the final burr size divided by the reference artery size, were correlated with decreased postatherectomy diameter stenosis (p <0.009) and decreased final diameter stenosis (p <0.03). However, there was no statistical association between postatherectomy or final diameter stenosis with need for revascularization (p = not significant [NS]). The need for revascularization was lowest for burr/artery ratio between 0.6 to 0.85 (15%) versus burr/artery <0.6 or >0.85 (25%) (p <0.04). Postatherectomy, smaller balloon/artery ratios, defined as the final balloon size divided by the reference artery size, were correlated with lower repeat revascularization rates. Balloon/artery ratios <0.95 (target vessel revascularization = 11% vs 25% in balloon/artery >0.95) were associated with the best luminal results and the least risk for clinical restenosis (p <0.006). For rotational atherectomy, despite improvement in acute luminal results with increased burr/artery ratio, the use of a moderate burr/artery ratio correlated with the lowest revascularization rates. There was no correlation between postatherectomy or final diameter stenosis and need for repeat interventions. However, the use of large balloon/artery ratios after rotablator was associated with higher target vessel revascularization rates.     

Health service costs of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial

For some patients with coronary artery disease, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We report comparative health service costs of these interventions within the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Medications were costed at published UK prices; other resource use was costed with a set of unit costs estimated at two recruiting centres to the RITA trial, one in London and one outside. Over 2-year follow-up of 1011 patients, the estimated mean additional cost for those randomised to CABG compared with PTCA was 1050 pounds (95% CI 621 pounds-1479 pounds), with unit costs from the non-London centre, and 1823 pounds (1202 pounds-2444 pounds), with unit costs from the London centre. The initial average cost of treating a patient randomised to PTCA is about 52% of that of CABG, but after 2 years this increased to about 80% because of the greater need for subsequent interventions. The balance of advantage between PTCA and CABG may change after several years: funding has been obtained to continue RITA follow-up for 10 years. However, on the basis of patients' status at 2 years, the cost advantages of PTCA cannot be ignored. Further research is necessary to assess whether the advantage of PTCA in terms of cost is translated into one of cost-effectiveness.     

Left main coronary artery stenosis following aortic valve replacement using a solid coronary perfusion catheter: report of two cases

We experienced two cases of iatrogenic left main coronary artery stenosis (IOCS) following double (aortic and mitral) valve replacement (DVR). The solid coronary perfusion catheter may attribute IOCS, with grave consequence. There have been no IOCS since the time we exchanged a solid catheter for a soft one. One case, she was successfully treated percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), because she developed angina pectoris about 5 years after PTCA. But she developed angina pectoris again and angiographically left main coronary was severe stenotic. So she was undergone aorto coronary bypass grafting (CABG) to the left anterior descending. The other case, he developed angina pectoris about 3 months after DVR. He was treated with PTCA. Angiographically left mine coronary artery stenosis reduced 50% from 90%. Generally the treatment of IOCS is CABG, but we performed PTCA for 2 patients. Because we thought it was very hazardous for us to perform them open heart surgery. When it is very hazardous to perform patients open heart surgery, they need to be performed PTCA.     

Stenting after optimal lesion debulking (sold) registry. Angiographic and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting has reduced restenosis in focal de novo lesions, but its impact has been less pronounced in complex lesion subsets. Preliminary data suggest a role for plaque burden in promoting intimal hyperplasia after stent implantation. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that plaque removal with directional atherectomy before stent implantation may lower the intensity of late neointimal hyperplasia, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-one patients with 90 lesions underwent directional atherectomy before coronary stenting. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting was performed in 73 lesions (81%). Clinical success was achieved in 96% of patients. Procedural complications were as follows: emergency bypass surgery in 1 patient (1.4%), who died 2 weeks later; Q-wave myocardial infarction in 2 patients (2.8%); and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in 8 patients (11.3%). None of the patients had stent thrombosis at follow-up. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 89% of eligible patients at 5.7+/-1.7 months. Loss index was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.40), and angiographic restenosis was 11% (95% CI, 5% to 20%). Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients at 18+/-3 months. Target lesion revascularization was 7% (95% CI, 3% to 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Directional atherectomy followed by coronary stenting could be performed with good clinical success rate. Also, these data point to a possible reduction in angiographic restenosis and a significant reduction in the need for repeated coronary interventions. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial seems appropriate to test the validity of this approach.     

Magnetically labeled secretin retains receptor affinity to pancreas acinar cells

To clarify the mechanisms of restenosis, restenotic human tissue specimens obtained by directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in 43 patients were immunohistochemically analysed for cell proliferation and deposition of PG-M/versican, an important extracellular matrix proteoglycan of the vessel wall. The patients were classified into five groups according to the period after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): 0-1 month (N = 6), 1-3 months (N = 12), 3-6 months (N = 11), more than 6 months (N = 6) and de novo lesions (N = 8). The tissue specimens were of 35 restenotic lesions following PTCA and eight primary stenotic lesions with no prior PTCA. Total cell numbers in the atherectomy specimens increased significantly up to 3 months after PTCA. Most cells were alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA)-positive. To evaluate cell proliferation, the specimens were immunostained for Ki-67 antigen (clone MIB-1). A significant increase in the positive ratio was observed up to 1 month after PTCA, although the labelling index was less than 1 per cent at every stage. The deposition of PG-M/versican, as analysed by immunohistochemistry, was greatest during the period 1-3 months after primary angioplasty, when restenosis detected by angiography progresses most actively. These results suggest that the peak of cell proliferation in the neointima occurs earlier than angiographic restenosis and that the deposition of PG-M/versican may be a major factor in restenosis following angioplasty.