Double‐yielding behavior in injection‐molded polycarbonate/high‐density polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer blends

A uniaxial tensile test was performed for polycarbonate (PC)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) blends with a fixed EVA content but various PC contents. The double‐yielding phenomenon and its composition dependence, as observed in the PC/HDPE blend, were again detected. EVA did not serve as a successful compatibilizer of PC and HDPE in the PC/HDPE/EVA blend. The incorporation of EVA resulted in a larger size and a more irregular shape of the PC fibers, as indicated in the scanning electron microscope observations; this, consequently, produced a higher serious stress concentration in the blend. This more complicated and instable morphology produced different double‐yielding behaviors in the PC/HDPE/EVA blends compared with the binary one. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Morphology Dependent Double Yielding in Injection Molded Polycarbonate/Polyethylene Blend

Summary: Polycarbonate (PC)/polyethylene (PE) blend was injection molded at different molding temperatures. The morphological observation by scanning electronic microscope (SEM) indicated that the sample molded at 190 °C contained only uniformly dispersed spherical PC particles. The samples molded at 230 and 275 °C had a typical skin‐core structure, and there were many injection‐induced PC fibers in the subskin. While the sample molded at 190 °C had the usual stress‐strain behavior, the samples obtained at 230 and 275 °C showed apparently double yielding behavior. It was suggested that the double yielding points were morphology‐dependent. The first one was the result of the yielding of PE at low strain, and the second one was caused by the yielding of the PC fibers. Moreover, it is the frictional force in the interfaces between PC and PE that transferred the stress to the PC fibers, hence giving rise to the reinforcement of PE by PC.

Stress‐strain curves of PC/PE blends injection molded at various temperatures showing first (I) and second (II) yielding points.     

Deformation and morphology development of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene and polycarbonate/polyethylene blends with high interfacial contact during elongation

Immiscible blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/polyethylene (PE) and polycarbonate (PC)/PE were examined to study the influence of the high interfacial contact (pseudo‐adhesion) on the mechanical properties and the morphology developed during elongation. The high interfacial contact resulted from the contraction difference of the two polymers during cooling from the processing temperature to room temperature. As a result of the pseudo‐adhesion, the tensile strength and modulus of the PET/PE and PC/PE blends increased steadily with the increase of PET and PC concentration. In PC/PE blends, numerous PC microfibers were formed in‐situ, while in PET/PE blends, slippage took place between the PET particles and the matrix. Moreover, the macroscopic morphology development of both blends upon elongation was quite different. For PET/PE blend, necking was initiated at one point close to the non‐gate end of the specimen, and then propagated uniformly from this point. For the PC/PE blend, necking‐initating sites and propagation were irregular, and consequently the whole tested zone was deformed. The recoil of partially elongated specimens indicated that the recoverability of the PC/PE blend is higher than that of the PET/PE blend. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1561–1570, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Studies on binary and ternary blends of polypropylene with SEBS,PS, and HDPE. II. Tensile and impact properties

Studies are reported on tensile and impact properties of several binary and ternary blends of polypropylene (PP), styrene-b-ethylene-co-butylene-b-styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polystyrene (PS). The blend compositions of the binary blends PP/X were 10 wt % X and 90 wt % PP, while those of the ternary blends PP/X/Y were 10 wt % of X and 90 wt % of PP/Y, or 10 wt % Y and 90 wt % PP/X (PP/Y and PP/X were of identical composition 90:10); X, Y being SEBS, HDPE, or PS. The results are interpreted for the effect of each individual component by comparing the binary blends with the reference system PP, and the ternary blends with the respective binary blends as the reference systems. The ternary blend PP/SEBS/HDPE showed properties distinctly superior to those of PP/SEBS/PS or the binary blends PP/SEBS and PP/HDPE. Differences in the tensile yield behavior of the different samples and their correlation with impact strength suggested shear yielding as the possible mechanism of enhancement of impact strength. Scanning electron microscopic study of the impact fractured surfaces also supports the shear yielding mechanism of impact toughening of these blends.     

Comparison of olefin copolymers as compatibilizers for polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene

Some polyolefin elastomers were compared as compatibilizers for blends of polypropylene (PP) with 30 wt % high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The compatibilizers included a multiblock ethylene–octene copolymer (OBC), two statistical ethylene–octene copolymers (EO), two propylene–ethylene copolymers (P/E), and a styrenic block copolymer (SBC). Examination of the blend morphology by AFM showed that the compatibilizer was preferentially located at the interface between the PP matrix and the dispersed HDPE particles. The brittle‐to‐ductile (BD) transition was determined from the temperature dependence of the blend toughness, which was taken as the area under the stress–strain curve. All the compatibilized blends had lower BD temperature than PP. However, the blend compatibilized with OBC had the best combination of low BD temperature and high toughness. Examination of the deformed blends by scanning electron microscopy revealed that in the best blends, the compatibilizer provided sufficient interfacial adhesion so that the HDPE domains were able to yield and draw along with the PP matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Processing‐improved properties and morphology of PP/COC blends

The aim of this study was to improve mechanical properties of polypropylene/cycloolefin copolymer (PP/COC) blends by processing‐induced formation of long COC fibers. According to the available literature, the fibrous morphology in PP/COC blends was observed just once by coincidence. For this reason, we focused our attention on finding processing conditions yielding PP/COC fibrous morphology in a well‐defined, reproducible way. A number of PP/COC blends were prepared by both compression molding and injection molding (IM). Neat polymers were characterized by rheological measurements, whereas phase morphology of the resulting PP/COC blends was characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The longest COC fibers were achieved in the injection molded PP/COC blends with compositions 75/25 and 70/30 wt %. Elastic modulus and yield strength of all blends were measured as functions of the blend composition using an Instron tensile tester; statistically significant improvement of the yield strength due to fibrous morphology was proved. Moreover, two different models were applied in the analysis of mechanical properties: (i) the equivalent box model for isotropic blends and (ii) the Halpin‐Tsai model for long fiber composites. In all PP/COC blends prepared by IM, the COC fibers were oriented in the processing direction, as documented by SEM micrographs, and acted as a reinforcing component, as evidenced by stress–strain measurements. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Morphology and properties of nylon6 and high density polyethylene blends in absence and presence of nanoclay

The morphology and properties of nylon6/HDPE blends without and with nanoclay has been reported. Scanning electron microscopy study of the (70/30 w/w) nylon6/HDPE blends with small amount (0.1 phr) of nanoclay indicated a reduction in the average domain sizes (D) of dispersed HDPE phase and hence better extent of mixing compared to the blend without any nanoclay. X‐ray diffraction study and transmission electron microscopy revealed that nanoclay layers were mostly located in nylon6 matrix of the (70/30 w/w) nylon6/HDPE blend. However, the same effect of nanoclay on the morphology was not observed in (30/70 w/w) nylon6/HDPE blend where HDPE became the matrix. In (30/70 w/w) nylon6/HDPE blend, addition of nanoclay increased the D of dispersed nylon6 domains by preferential location of the clays in side the nylon6 domains. Thus, the clay platelets in the matrix phase acted as barrier that restricted the coalescence of dispersed domains during melt‐mixing. Addition of PE‐g‐MA in both the compositions of nylon6/HDPE blend effectively reduced the D of dispersed phases. Storage modulus and thermal stability of the blend were improved in presence of small amount of clay, whereas addition of PE‐g‐MA lowered the mechanical and thermal properties of the blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Thermal and mechanical properties of uncrosslinked and chemically crosslinked polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer blends

Uncrosslinked and chemically crosslinked binary blends of low‐ and high‐density polyethylene (PE), with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), were prepared by a melt‐mixing process using 0–3 wt % tert‐butyl cumyl peroxide (BCUP). The uncrosslinked blends revealed two distinct unchanged melting peaks corresponding to the individual components of the blends, but with a reduced overall degree of crystallinity. The crosslinking further reduced crystallinity, but enhanced compatibility between EVA and polyethylene, with LDPE being more compatible than HDPE. Blended with 20 wt % EVA, the EVA melting peak was almost disappeared after the addition of BCUP, and only the corresponding PE melting point was observed at a lowered temperature. But blended with 40% EVA, two peaks still existed with a slight shift toward lower temperatures. Changes of mechanical properties with blending ratio, crosslinking, and temperature had been dominated by the extent of crystallinity, crosslinking degree, and morphology of the blend. A good correlation was observed between elongation‐at‐break and morphological properties. The blends with higher level of compatibility showed less deviation from the additive rule of mixtures. The deviation became more pronounced for HDPE/EVA blends in the phase inversion region, while an opposite trend was observed for LDPE/EVA blends with co‐continuous morphology. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3261–3270, 2007     

Effect of ethylene-propylene copolymer with residual PE crystallinity on mechanical properties and morphology of PP/HDPE blends

Morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/high density polyethylene (HDPE) blends modified by ethylene-propylene copolymers (EPC) with residual PE crystallinity were investigated. The EPC showed different interfacial behavior in PP/HDPE blends of different compositions. A 25/75 blend of PP/HDPE (weight ratio) showed improved tensile strength and elongation at break at low EPC content (5 wt %). For the PP/HDPE = 50/50 blend, the presence of the EPC component tended to make the PP dispresed phase structure transform into a cocontinuous one, probably caused by improved viscosity matching of the two components. Both tensile strength and elongation at break were improved at EPC content of 5 wt %. For PP/HDPE 75/25 blends, the much smaller dispersed HDPE phase and significantly improved elongation at break resulted from compatibilization by EPC copolymers. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Effect of dynamic crosslinking on tensile yield behavior of polypropylene/ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber blends

Tensile yield behavior of the blends of polypropylene (PP) with ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM) is studied in blend composition range 0–40 wt % EPDM rubber. These blends were prepared in a laboratory internal mixer by simultaneous blending and dynamic vulcanization. Vulcanization was performed with dimethylol phenolic resin. For comparison, unvulcanized PP/EPDM blends were also prepared. In comparison to the unvulcanized blends, dynamically vulcanized blends showed higher yield stress and modulus. The increase of interfacial adhesion caused by production of three‐dimensional network is considered to be the most important factor in the improvement. It permits the interaction of the stress concentrate zone developed at the rubber particles and causes shear yielding of the PP matrix. Systematic changes with varying blend composition were found in stress‐strain behavior in the yield region, viz., in yield stress, yield strain, width of yield peak, and work of yield. Analysis of yield stress data on the basis of the various expressions of first power and two‐thirds power laws of blend compositions dependence and the porosity model led to consistent results from all expression about the variation of stress concentration effect in both unvulcanized and vulcanized blend systems. Shapes and sizes of dispersed rubber phase (EPDM) domains at various blend compositions were studied by scanning electron microscopy. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2104–2121, 2000     

Rheological behavior comparison between PET/HDPE and PC/HDPE microfibrillar blends

The rheological behaviors of in situ microfibrillar blends, including a typical semicrystalline/semicrystalline (polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)) and a typical amorphous/semicrystalline (polycarbonate (PC)/HDPE) polymer blend were investigated in this study. PET and PC microfibrils exhibit different influences on the rheological behaviors of microfibrillar blends. The viscosity of the microfibrillar blends increases with increased PET and PC concentrations. Surprisingly, the length/diameter ratio of the microfibrils as a result of the hot stretch ratio (HSR) has an opposite influence on the rheological behavior of the two microfibrillar blends. The stretched PET/HDPE blend exhibits higher viscosity than the unstretched counterpart, while the stretched PC/HDPE blend exhibits lower viscosity than the unstretched blend. The data obtained in this study will be helpful for constructing a technical foundation for the recycling and utilization of PET, PC, and HDPE waste mixtures by manufacturing microfibrillar blends in the future. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1231–1238, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Mechanical behaviors of ethylene/styrene interpolymer compatibilized polystyrene/polyethylene blends

In this study, ethylene/styrene interpolymer was used as a compatibilizer for the blends of polystyrene (PS) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The mechanical properties including tensile and impact properties and morphology of the blends were investigated by means of uniaxial tension, instrumented falling‐weight impact measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. Tensile tests showed that the yield strength of the PS/HDPE/ESI blends decreases considerably with increasing HDPE content. However, the elongation at break of the blends tended to increase significantly with increasing HDPE content. The excellent tensile ductility of the HDPE‐rich blends resulted from shield yielding of the matrix. Izod and Charpy impact measurements indicated that the impact strength of the blends increases slowly with HDPE content up to 40 wt %; thereafter, it increases sharply with increasing HDPE content. The impact energy of the HDPE‐rich blends exceeded that of pure HDPE, implying that the HDPE polymer can be further toughened by the incorporation of brittle PS minor phase in the presence of ESI compatibilizer. The correlation between the impact property and morphology of the blends is discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 4001–4007, 2007     

Phase structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density polyethylene based on recycled materials

Blends based on recycled high density polyethylene (R‐HDPE) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) were made through reactive extrusion. The effects of maleated polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene (SEBS), and 4,4′‐methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) on blend properties were studied. The 2% PE‐g‐MA improved the compatibility of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in all blends toughened by SEBS. For the R‐HDPE/R‐PET (70/30 w/w) blend toughened by SEBS, the dispersed PET domain size was significantly reduced with use of 2% PE‐g‐MA, and the impact strength of the resultant blend doubled. For blends with R‐PET matrix, all strengths were improved by adding MDI through extending the PET molecular chains. The crystalline behaviors of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in one‐phase rich systems influenced each other. The addition of PE‐g‐MA and SEBS consistently reduced the crystalline level (χ_c) of either the R‐PET or the R‐HDPE phase and lowered the crystallization peak temperature (T_c) of R‐PET. Further addition of MDI did not influence R‐HDPE crystallization behavior but lowered the χ_c of R‐PET in R‐PET rich blends. The thermal stability of R‐HDPE/R‐PET 70/30 and 50/50 (w/w) blends were improved by chain‐extension when 0.5% MDI was added. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Morphology and electrical properties of short carbon fiber-filled polymer blends: High-density polyethylene/poly(methyl methacrylate)

Morphology and electrical properties of short carbon fiber-filled high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) polymer blends have been studied. The percolation threshold of HDPE50/PMMA50 blends filled with vapor-grown carbon fiber (VGCF), 1.25 phr VGCF content, is much lower than those of the individual polymers. The SEM micrographs verified that the enhancement of conductivity could be attributed to the selective location of VGCF in the HDPE phase. A double percolation is the basic requirement for the conductivity of the composites, i.e., the percolation of carbon fibers in the HDPE phase and the continuity of this phase in the blends, which hereby are defined as the first percolation and the second percolation, respectively. The SEM micrographs also showed that the short carbon fibers could affect the morphology of the blends. With the increase of VGCF content, the HDPE domains are elongated from spherical into strip shape, finally develop to a continuous structure. As a result, the second percolation threshold of the blends filled with 2.5 phr VGCF, 20 wt % HDPE, is lower than that of the blends filled with 1.5 phr VGCF, 30 wt % HDPE. The influence of molding temperature and time on the second percolation threshold has also been investigated. For the composites molded at a lower temperature, the second percolation threshold is shifted to a higher VGCF content, but there is little influence of molding time on the second percolation threshold. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 1813–1819, 1998     

Mechanical properties and creep resistance in polystyrene/polyethylene blends

Recycled plastics, predominantly high‐density polyethylene (PE), are being processed in the shape of dimension lumber and marketed as “plastic lumber.” One drawback to these products is their low creep resistance or high creep speed. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of reducing the creep speed of PE‐based products by blending the PE with a lower‐creep plastic, in this case polystyrene (PS). Various blends of PE and PS were prepared in either a laboratory extruder or a bowl mixer and then compression‐molded. The mechanical properties, creep behavior, morphology, and thermal properties of extruded and compression‐molded samples were determined. The modulus of elasticity of the extruded blends could be estimated by a weighted average of PS and PE, even in the absence of a compatibilizer. Processing strongly affected the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends. For 50% PS : 50% PE blends, the stress–strain curves of the extruded samples showed PE‐like behavior, whereas those from compression‐molded samples were brittle, PS‐like curves. Flexural strength was 50% higher in the extruded samples than in those from compression molding. The creep experiments were performed in three‐point bending. Creep speed was lower in 50% PS : 50% PE and 75% PS : 25% PE blends than in pure PS. Creep speed of 75% PS : 25% PE was lowest of all the extruded blends. PE formed the continuous phase even when the PS content was as high as 50 wt %. For a 75% PS : 25% PE blend, cocontinuous phases were observed in the machine direction. A ribbonlike PS‐dispersed phase was observed in the 25% PS : 75% PE and 50% PS : 50% PE samples. Blending low‐creep‐speed PS with high‐creep‐speed PE appeared to successfully improve the performance of the final composite. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1100–1108, 2000     

Toughening of recycled polystyrene used for TV backset

The recycled polystyrene (rPS) was toughened with ethylene‐octylene copolymer thermoplastic elastomer (POE) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with various melt flow index (MFI), compatibilized by styrene‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (SBS) to enhance the toughness of rPS for use as TV backset. The rPS/POE binary blends exhibited an increased impact strength with 5–10 wt % POE content followed by a decrease with the POE content up to 20 wt %, which could be due to poor compatibility between POE and rPS. For rPS/POE/SBS ternary blends with 20 wt % of POE content, the impact strength increased dramatically and a sharp brittle‐ductile transition was observed as the SBS content was around 3–5 wt %. Rheological study indicated a possible formation of network structure by adding of SBS, which could be a new mechanism for rPS toughening. In rPS/POE/HDPE/SBS (70/20/5/5) quaternary blends, a fibril‐like structure was observed as the molecular weight of HDPE was higher (with lower MFI). The presence of HDPE fibers in the blends could not enhance the network structure, but could stop the crack propagation during fracture process, resulting in a further increase of the toughness. The prepared quaternary blend showed an impact strength of 9.3 kJ/m² and a tensile strength of 25 MPa, which can be well used for TV backset to substitute HIPS because this system is economical and environmental friendly. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

PC/UHMWPE/(HDPE/LDPE)-g-GMA共混物的形态结构与力学性能

采用反应挤出增容方法，制备了PC／UHMWPE／(HDPE／LDPE)-g-GMA共混物，并对其力学性能和形态结构进行研究。结果表明：共混物的冲击断面出现了严重的撕裂现象，基体产生了剪切屈服形变；共混物的拉伸强度随相容剂和UHMWPE用量的增加而降低，冲击强度随着相容剂用量的增加呈现先增加后减小的变化；当相容剂用量为6份时，冲击强度达到最大值66kJ／m^2，比未增容的PC／UHMWPE共混物提高了28．5kJ／m^2。     

Morphology and Rheological Behaviors of Polycarbonate/High Density Polyethylene in situ Microfibrillar Blends

Summary: Polycarbonate (PC)/high density polyethylene (HDPE) in situ microfibrillar blends were fabricated by a slit die extrusion, hot stretching, and quenching process. Despite PC and HDPE having a high viscosity ratio, which is usually disadvantageous to fibrillation, the morphological observation indicated that the blends had well‐defined PC microfibrils. The size and amount of the PC fibrils were nonuniform through the thickness of the extrudate, and were also affected by the PC concentration and hot stretch ratio. There were coarse and dense fibrils in the core zone, while these fibrils became finer and reduced in number toward the surface. The melt flow rate (MFR) of the PC/HDPE microfibrillar blend decreased with the increase of PC concentration, but increased with the larger hot stretching rate (or hot stretching ratio, HSR). Besides, it was found that the fibrillar blend had better flowability than the common blend with spherical particles at the same PC concentration. Temperature was also an important factor influencing the MFR due to the temperature dependence of PC and HDPE viscosity, and the PC phase morphology. The PC microfibrils could not be preserved beyond 230 °C and transformed into spherical particles. The rheological behaviors at various shear rates were studied by capillary rheometer. The orientation of PC fibrils and HDPE molecules with higher shear rate led to a decrease in the viscosity of microfibrillar blend. The data obtained in this study can help construct the technical foundation for recycling and utilization of PC and HDPE waste by manufacture of microfibrillar blends in future work.

SEM micrograph of the PC/HDPE microfibrillar blend.     

Comparison of irreversible deformation and yielding in microlayers of polycarbonate with poly(methylmethacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Microlayers of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) or poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were processed with varying layer thicknesses. Adhesion between PC and PMMA was found to be an order of magnitude higher than between PC and SAN, as determined with the T‐peel method. To probe the effect of the adhesion difference on yielding and deformation of PC/PMMA and PC/SAN microlayers, the macroscopic stress–strain behavior was examined as a function of layer thickness and strain rate, and the results were interpreted in terms of the microdeformation behavior. During yielding, crazes in thick SAN layers opened up into cracks; however, PC layers drew easily because local delamination relieved constraint at the PC/SAN interface. Adhesion of PC/PMMA was too strong for delamination at the interface when PMMA crazes opened up into cracks at low strain rates. Instead, PMMA cracks tore into neighboring PC layers and initiated fracture. At higher strain rates, good adhesion produced yielding of thick PMMA layers, a phenomenon not observed with thick SAN layers. The change in microdeformation mechanism of PMMA with increasing strain rate produced a transition in the yield stress of PC/PMMA microlayers. Microlayers of both PC/SAN and PC/PMMA with thinner layers (individual layers 0.3–0.6 μm thick) exhibited improved ballistic performance compared to microlayers with thicker layers (individual layers 10–20 μm thick), which was due to cooperative yielding of both components. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1545–1557, 2000