Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

A new method for evaluation of motor deficits in 3-acetylpyridine-treated rats

BACKGROUND: approximately one-third of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) respond favourably to the anticholinesterase tacrine, but the drug's usefulness is marred by a high incidence of side-effects. OBJECTIVE: to discover if AD patients with white matter low attenuation (WMLA) represents a subgroup that responds differently to tacrine from those with no WMLA. DESIGN: the results come from a combination of double-blind and open studies. Seventy-two AD patients prescribed tacrine in our centre were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of WMLA on brain CT scans. We compared the rate of response to and withdrawal from tacrine between the groups. Response was defined as an improvement in the Mini-Mental State Examination score of three or more points at 3 months. RESULTS: 18 of the 72 patients were found to have WMLA. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients responding to tacrine in each group (28.5% in those with WMLA and 31% in those without), but the rate of withdrawal from tacrine did differ: 11 patients with WMLA (61%) had to be withdrawn prematurely, compared with 14 patients (26%) in the group without evidence of WMLA (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: AD patients with WMLA can still respond to tacrine, although the rate of withdrawal from treatment is much higher in such patients.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Final report of a phase II study of chemotherapy with bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin for locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type

PURPOSE: This article presents an assessment of the combination of bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy in the treatment of undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type in patients with recurrent/metastatic disease (group A), and in previously untreated patients with locoregionally advanced disease (UICC-AJCC 87, N2-3, M0) (group B) in terms of toxicity, antitumoral activity, and therapeutic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1987 to September 1990, 111 consecutive patients with histologically proven UCNT were treated with six cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1) epirubicin (80 mg/m2 day 1), and bleomycin (15 mg bolus day 1), followed by 16 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 5 days, repeated every 21 days for three cycles. Three further cycles without bleomycin were given to 44 patients in group A. In group B (67 patients), only three cycles of the same protocol were given, with a slightly lower dose of epirubicin (70 mg/m2), followed by conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy/7 weeks). RESULTS: Of 44 patients entered in group A, 38 were evaluable for response. We observed 9 (20%) complete responses and 11 (25%) partial responses, for a 45% overall response rate. In 12 patients not previously given chemotherapy, there were 4 complete responses, compared to 5 complete responses in 32 patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Four patients are alive with no evidence of disease after 53+, 60+, 61+, and 72+ months. In group B the overall response rate to chemotherapy was 98% with 42 complete (62%) and 24 partial responses (36%). Three months after the end of radiotherapy, the overall complete response rate was 94% (63 patients). After a median follow-up time of 77 months (range, 53-94), the 4-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates for this group are 66% and 60%, respectively. The median disease-free survival has not been reached at 90 months. CONCLUSION: The results of the BEC combination trial are very encouraging in metastatic and recurrrent UCNT, with durable remissions in this poor-prognosis population. The results in patients with locally advanced disease have motivated prospective phase III testing of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach to evaluate its impact on locoregionally advanced disease (> or =N2MO UICC-AJCC 87).     

Assessment of the value of therapeutic monitoring of tacrine in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to validate the lower end of the putative therapeutic range of serum tacrine concentrations of 7-20 ng ml(-1) in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: The relationship between dose, steady-state serum tacrine concentrations and change in MMSE score (a measure of cognitive function) was examined in 106 Alzheimer's disease patients who had been treated with the drug for 12 weeks. RESULTS: In all, 72% of patients showed some response, but there was no relationship between dose and the chance of a favourable outcome. The proportion of patients with serum concentrations above 7 ng x ml(-1) who improved (79%) was significantly greater than that of those with serum concentrations below this level (47%) (P < 0.02). Also, a significantly greater proportion of patients with serum concentrations above both 5 ng x ml(-1) and 9 ng x ml(-1) showed improvement in comparison to those with concentrations below these levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that therapeutic monitoring of serum tacrine concentrations might increase the possibility of responding to tacrine by some 68%. This represents an important contribution to the management of Alzheimer's disease patients with this drug, and may also be relevant to the use of the newer generation of cholinesterase inhibitors.     

Phase I/II trial of all-trans retinoic acid and tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer

Because tamoxifen and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) have additive antitumor effects in preclinical systems, we performed a Phase I/II clinical trial of this combination in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients with potentially hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All received 20 mg of tamoxifen by mouth daily. Consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients were treated on odd-numbered weeks with ATRA at doses of 70, 110, 150, 190, or 230 mg/m2/day. Twenty-six patients were entered in this trial; 25 were evaluable. A dose of 230 mg/m2 ATRA produced unacceptable headache and dermatological toxicity, but doses < or = 190 mg/m2 were tolerable. Two of 7 patients with measurable disease responded. Seven of 18 patients with evaluable, nonmeasurable disease achieved disease stability for more than 6 months. Plasma AUCs on day 1 of successive weeks of treatment were stable over time. A nonsignificant decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor I levels was noted during treatment, but this trend was similar to that observed in three "control" patients treated with tamoxifen alone. When given with daily tamoxifen, the maximum tolerated dose of ATRA that could be given on alternate weeks was 190 mg/m2/day. This schedule of ATRA resulted in repeated periods of exposure to potentially therapeutic concentrations of ATRA. Declines in the serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations observed in patients treated with tamoxifen and ATRA were similar to those observed in patients treated with tamoxifen alone. Objective responses were observed, some in patients who had previously progressed while receiving tamoxifen, suggesting that further studies would be of interest.     

Are fluoxetine plasma levels related to outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder?

OBJECTIVE: In obsessive-compulsive disorder, the relationship between blood levels of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and clinical outcome is unclear. In a multicenter trial, the authors examined the relationship between steady state plasma levels of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine (determined after 7 weeks of treatment), and their sum, and clinical outcome. METHOD: Ratings of symptom severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores) were obtained at baseline and after 13 weeks for 200 adult outpatients with moderately severe obsessive-compulsive disorder treated with fluoxetine doses of 20 mg/day (N = 68), 40 mg/day (N = 64), and 60 mg/day (N = 68). RESULTS: Mean plasma levels of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were statistically significantly higher with higher dose. Statistical analyses revealed no significant relationship for plasma level of either molecule or their sum in predicting endpoint percent change in obsessive-compulsive scores. Plasma levels of patients with a marked response (decrease of 50% or more in obsessive-compulsive score) did not differ significantly from those of nonresponders (less than a 25% decrease in obsessive-compulsive score). No hint was seen of a therapeutic window or of a relationship limited to one gender or within the lowest dose group (20 mg/day). However, since S-norfluoxetine is a much more potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor than R-norfluoxetine, the absence of chiral (stereospecific) assays in this study limits the results. CONCLUSIONS: Steady state plasma levels of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are not related to clinical outcome in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Individual patients can be told only that the optimum dose of fluoxetine for them will be the dose that produces the largest therapeutic effect with the smallest side effect burden. Future studies should examine the predictive utility of measures of serotonergic neuronal function and, if plasma levels of norfluoxetine are examined, the use of chiral assays.     

Phase I/II trial of dexverapamil, epirubicin, and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cytotoxic regimen consisting of the second-generation chemosensitizer dexverapamil (DVPM), high dose epirubicin, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied. Treatment consisted of oral DVPM at a dose of 1000-1200 mg/day for 3 days, epirubicin administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Day 2 with an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, and a dose of GM-CSF of 400 micrograms administered subcutaneously from Day 5s through 14. Epirubicin dose escalation levels were 90, 105, 120 and 135 mg/m2. Consecutive cohorts of four to eight patients were planned at each dose level. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, specifically granulocytopenia, constituted the dose-limiting toxicity with an MTD of 120 mg/m2 for epirubicin. Despite routine supportive therapy with GM-CSF, four, two, and five patients experienced Grade 4 granulocytopenia during their first two treatment courses at levels 105, 120, and 135 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two, three, and one additional patients during subsequent courses with these levels. Nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon, generally modest, and did not correlate clearly with the anthracycline dose. Dexverapamil-related cardiovascular symptoms occurred frequently, but they never resulted in serious toxicity requiring active medical intervention or permanent discontinuation of therapy. Nine of 28 patients achieved partial responses to this therapy. Stable disease was observed in nine patients, and tumor progress occurred in 10. CONCLUSION: The MTD of epirubicin for this regimen with DVPM and GM-CSF was 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Though it remains uncertain whether the encouraging response activity observed in this disease-oriented Phase I study was, in fact, due to successful modulation of multidrug resistance, these results suggest that this regimen is likely to be an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer, which should be evaluated further.     

Time to clozapine response in a standardized trial

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine the time to clozapine response in treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia. METHOD: Antipsychotic response to a clozapine trial was examined in 50 treatment-refractory schizophrenic inpatients. Subjects were treated with clozapine for at least 12 months, regardless of response status, according to a standardized, increasing dose protocol. Behavioral changes were measured through monthly assessments with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects (68%) met clinical response criteria by the end of the trial. Response was achieved at a mean dose of 468 mg/day (SD = 168). The dose of 30 (88%) of the responding patients was 600 mg/day or less. The mean time to response was 82 days (SD = 100, range = 10-401). It took an average of 60 days (SD = 87) for subjects to reach the dose at which clozapine response was achieved. Once this dose was reached, the average response time was 17 days (SD = 14, range = 2-56). All 34 subjects who responded met criteria within 8 weeks of a clozapine dose escalation. No late response was found in the remaining 16 subjects despite a mean follow-up period of 75 weeks (SD = 50). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all patients who responded to clozapine did so within 8 weeks of a change in dose. Thus, there appears to be little clinical gain in prolonging exposure to clozapine beyond 8 weeks at any particular dose if no response is seen.     

Differential effects of migraine drugs on cerebral blood flow autoregulation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients and outpatients. METHOD: Patients with a major depressive episode (DSM-III-R), a baseline score of > or=21 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and > or=2 on HAM-D Item 1 (depressed mood) were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment with either mirtazapine (N=66, 15-60 mg/day) or fluoxetine (N=67, 20-40 mg/day). The upper limit of the mirtazapine dose range was above the dose range approved in the United States (15-45 mg/day). Efficacy was evaluated by the HAM-D, Clinical Global Impressions, the Visual Analogue Mood Rating Scale (VAMRS), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ). The efficacy analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat group using the last-observation-carried-forward method. RESULTS: Mean total 17-item HAM-D scores at baseline were 26.0 for the mirtazapine- and 26.1 for the fluoxetine-treated group. The decrease from baseline on the HAM-D was larger in the mirtazapine than in the fluoxetine group throughout the treatment period, reaching statistical significance at days 21 and 28. At assessments from day 21 and onward, the absolute difference between the 2 study groups favoring mirtazapine ranged from 3.7 to 4.2 points, the magnitude of difference usually seen between an efficacious antidepressant drug and placebo. Mean dosages at weeks 1-4 were 36.5 mg/day for mirtazapine and 19.6 mg/day for fluoxetine; the respective dosages at weeks 5-6 were 56.3 mg and 35.8 mg. Similar numbers of patients dropped out due to adverse events; tolerability profiles were comparable except for changes in body weight from baseline which were statistically significantly more pronounced in the mirtazapine group compared to the fluoxetine group. CONCLUSION: We found that mirtazapine was as well tolerated as fluoxetine and significantly more effective after 3 and 4 weeks of therapy.     

Omeprazole, azithromycin and amoxicillin or amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid in eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease

Treatment with omeprazole (OME), azithromycin (AZI) and amoxicillin (AMO) resulted in encouraging Helicobacter pylori cure rates in pilot and control studies. The aim of this study was to establish whether OME + AZI in combination with either AMO or ACA (amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid) are effective in curing H. pylori infection. A hundred patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection were treated with OME (day 1-10: 2 x 40 mg/day, day 11-24: 40 mg/day, day 25-42: 20 mg/day) plus AZI 500 mg/day for the first 6 days. Patients were randomly assigned to either AMO 2 x 1000 mg/day (group A, n = 50) or ACA 2 x 1250 mg/day (group B, n = 50) during the first 10 days of treatment. H. pylori status was determined by urease test and histology before and 6 weeks after completion of therapy. Ninety-five patients completed the study. H. pylori infection was eradicated in 85.4% (41/48) patients from group A (intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: 82%) versus 91.5% (43/47) patients from group B (ITT) analysis: 86%) (NS). All ulcer had healed after 42 days of omeprazole treatment. Side effects, usually minor, were recorded in 12.5% (group A) and 14.9% (group B) of patients (NS). Therapy had to be discontinued in two patients (one in group A and one group B) only. Ten-days treatment with OME and AZI (for the first 6 days) with AMO or ACA are simple and highly effective regimens to cure H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.     

Long-term management of Crohn's disease with mesalamine capsules (Pentasa). Pentasa Crohn's Disease Compassionate Use Study Group

Current long-term treatment of Crohn's disease is unsatisfactory. Based on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), this multicenter trial enrolled patients with either active Crohn's disease (CDAI > or = 150) or disease in remission (CDAI < 150). The primary measure of therapeutic response was mean change in CDAI from baseline to final visit. All patients began treatment with a dosage of < or = 4 g/day of mesalamine that ranged from 3.7 g at baseline to 3.4 g at final visit. Overall, 467 patients were enrolled: 333 (active disease) and 134 (remission). The median study participation time was 14 months. For patients entering with active disease, the mean reduction in CDAI was 77 points, with 42% (122/289) achieving remission by their final visit. For patients entering in remission, there was an increase in mean CDAI from 90 at baseline to 96 at final visit, with 79% (95/120) of patients in remission at final visit and 72% (31/43) in remission continuously after 12 months of therapy. From baseline to final visit, the mean prednisone dose decreased 5 mg/day in patients with active disease and 11 mg/day in patients in remission. Mesalamine was well tolerated and no adverse laboratory trends were observed. These results suggest that controlled-release mesalamine shows promise as a steroid-sparing agent and as a safe and effective long-term therapy for the induction of and maintenance of remission of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease.     

A nonlinear mathematical model of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle

Researchers disagree as to whether Lewy body disease (LBD) constitutes a variant of Alzheimer's (AD) or Parkinson's disease (PD), or alternatively, whether it is an independent disease process. The neuropathological, genetic, and clinical characteristics of LBD are reviewed and compared to those of AD and PD. Data for 150 cases of LBD reported in the literature were compiled and grouped according to neuropathological status. Patients with pure LBD (with limited or no concurrent AD pathology) tend to present at a younger age with extrapyramidal signs followed by dementia, whereas patients with mixed LBD-AD (concurrent LB and AD pathology) are somewhat older and tend to present with dementia. The cognitive profile of LBD patients, and the relationships among LBD, AD, and PD remain unclear due to methodological limitations and the paucity of studies comparing the groups directly.     

New combination of the old drugs for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the PAVE regimen

PURPOSE: A regimen of cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide (PAVE) was designed for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who were older than 65 years, with the following objectives compared with standard chemotherapy regimens: maintain efficacy, diminish toxicity, enhance compliance, and improve chemotherapy administration convenience at an acceptable cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PAVE regimen consisted of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) day 1; doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; vincristine 1.0 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and orally days 3 and 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles. Patients with limited-stage disease and selected patients with extensive-stage disease received thoracic irradiation delivered concurrently with etoposide-cisplatin (EP) at the time of the second chemotherapy cycle. RESULTS: Sixty-six eligible patients were treated, which included 25 patients with limited-stage disease and 41 patients with extensive-stage disease. Median survival was 70 weeks and 5-year survival was 25% for limited-stage disease. Median survival was 46 weeks for extensive-stage disease. Only one treatment-related death occurred and severe toxicity was infrequent. The median delivered dose-intensity was according to protocol and the mean delivered total dose was 80% of intended. CONCLUSION: The treatment outcome achieved with PAVE in a phase II study of elderly patients compared favorably with published results of standard regimens in patient populations with better prognostic factors. Because the PAVE regimen can be delivered with good compliance, has acceptable toxicity, and is associated with logistic advantages compared with standard regimens, this protocol is suitable for further investigative trials in elderly patients with SCLC.     

Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as maintenance therapy for rheumatoid arthritis after combination therapy with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) to extend the response to combination therapy with HCQ and methotrexate (MTX) and the safety of longterm HCQ maintenance therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two-part study consisting of an open label segment evaluating combination HCQ/MTX therapy followed by a double blind segment evaluating maintenance therapy for a total of 60 weeks. First, all patients were treated with HCQ 400 mg/day and MTX 7.5 to 15 mg/week for 24 weeks. Then, responders were randomized into 3 groups: (1) HCQ with MTX as needed for disease flare (n = 40), (2) HCQ 400 mg/day (n = 41), or (3) placebo with MTX as needed for disease flare (n = 40), each for 36 weeks. RESULTS: Clinical disease and laboratory variables improved significantly during initial combination therapy with HCQ and MTX. After MTX withdrawal, HCQ-containing maintenance regimens delayed the onset of disease flare (p = 0.023). There were no unexpected adverse events at any time or between-group differences in the distribution of adverse events during the double blind segment. CONCLUSION: Combination of HCQ and MTX appeared to be effective and well tolerated for 24 weeks. After withdrawal of MTX, HCQ extended the response seen with combination therapy and was well tolerated for 36 weeks. Initial therapy with HCQ and MTX, followed by maintenance HCQ, may be a useful alternative for the treatment of RA.     

Microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed as an outpatient procedure by minilaparotomy are less expensive and as safe as those performed as an inpatient procedure

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) plus low dose corticosteroids for induction of remission in generalized Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and to possibly identify predictive factors for the outcome under this therapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open label study, including 17 patients with not immediately life threatening, generalized WG. Treatment consisted of intravenous MTX 0.3 mg/kg once weekly plus daily oral low dose prednisone for initial diagnosis of WG in 11 and for a generalized relapse of WG in 6 patients. Interdisciplinary, standardized assessments of disease activity and extent were done 3-monthly. RESULTS: Within a median treatment period of 24.5 months remission could be achieved in 10/17 patients (59%), their median corticosteroid dose during that time was 1.75 mg/day. Seven patients with a median concomitant prednisone dose of 7.5 mg/day did not respond, among them 4 patients who were treated for a relapse of WG. Signs of de novo glomerulonephritis occurred in 5 of the 7 nonresponders. Significant side effects, including opportunistic infections, did not occur. CONCLUSION: Weekly low dose MTX in combination with low dose corticosteroids leads to an acceptable remission rate of almost 60% without significant side effects. Patients treated for a relapse of WG and patients with a need for a higher concomitant prednisone dose seem to be at risk for nonresponse, with a high likelihood of developing de novo glomerulonephritis.     

Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT: Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces dietary fat absorption by approximately 30%, may promote weight loss and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that orlistat combined with dietary intervention is more effective than placebo plus diet for weight loss and maintenance over 2 years. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from October 1992 to October 1995. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Obese adults (body mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters], 30-43 kg/m2) evaluated at 18 US research centers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received placebo plus a controlled-energy diet during a 4-week lead-in. On study day 1, the diet was continued and subjects were randomized to receive placebo 3 times a day or orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, for 52 weeks. After 52 weeks, subjects began a weight-maintenance diet, and the placebo group (n = 133) continued to receive placebo and orlistat-treated subjects were rerandomized to receive placebo 3 times a day (n = 138), orlistat, 60 mg (n = 152) or 120 mg (n = 153) 3 times a day, for an additional 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body weight change and changes in blood pressure and serum lipid, glucose, and insulin levels. RESULTS: A total of 1187 subjects entered the protocol, and 892 were randomly assigned on day 1 to double-blind treatment. For intent-to-treat analysis, 223 placebo-treated subjects and 657 orlistat-treated subjects were evaluated. During the first year orlistat-treated subjects lost more weight (mean +/- SEM, 8.76+/-0.37 kg) than placebo-treated subjects (5.81+/-0.67 kg) (P<.001). Subjects treated with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, during year 1 and year 2 regained less weight during year 2 (3.2+/-0.45 kg; 35.2% regain) than those who received orlistat, 60 mg (4.26+/-0.57 kg; 51.3% regain), or placebo (5.63+/-0.42 kg; 63.4% regain) in year 2 (P<.001). Treatment with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, was associated with improvements in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year treatment with orlistat plus diet significantly promotes weight loss, lessens weight regain, and improves some obesity-related disease risk factors.     

A Phase I dose escalation trial of continuous infusion paclitaxel to augment high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa plus stem cell rescue for the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, an effective chemotherapeutic agent in the management of breast carcinoma, may have activity in women whose disease has recurred after high dose chemotherapy. With this is mind the authors explored the addition of a 120-hour continuous infusion of paclitaxel to a previously reported regimen comprised of high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. METHODS: Thirty-one women with advanced breast carcinoma (30 patients with Stage IV disease and 1 patient with Stage IIIB disease) underwent harvest and cryopreservation of bone marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells. High dose cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m2) and thiotepa (225 mg/m2) were administered intravenously on Days -7, -5, and -3. Paclitaxel was administered as a 120-hour continuous infusion starting on Day -7. RESULTS: Three patients were treated at the initial cohort dose of 50 mg/m2 (over 120 hours), 6 patients at 100 mg/m2, 6 patients at 125 mg/m2, 6 patients at 150 mg/m2, 6 patients at 180 mg/m2, and 4 patients at 210 mg/m2. All patients completed the treatment protocol as planned with no associated transplant-related deaths. Mucositis as evidenced by either stomatitis or noninfectious diarrhea was experienced by all patients and was determined to be the dose-limiting toxicity at the 210 mg/m2 dose level. One patient with dose-limiting mucositis required intubation for airway protection and also experienced Grade 3 (according to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B common toxicity grading scale) pulmonary and neurologic toxicity. Only one Grade 3 toxicity was encountered below the maximum tolerated dose in a patient who developed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage at a dose of 125 mg/m2. No allergic reactions or clinical evidence of peripheral neuropathies were encountered. Cardiac, hepatic, and renal toxicities were minimal. Response rates in this previously treated patient population were difficult to assess in light of the high incidence of bone metastases; an overall response rate of 24% was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 180 mg/m2 as a 120-hour continuous infusion may be added safely to high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa with autologous stem cell rescue. Further studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and further define the toxicity of this recommended Phase II dose.     

Genetic diversity of nifH gene sequences in paenibacillus azotofixans strains and soil samples analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of the dolastatin 15 analog LU103793 when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six courses of LU103793 at doses of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m2 were administered to 26 patients with advanced solid malignancies. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 of course one. Pharmacokinetic variables were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Neutropenia, peripheral edema, and liver function test abnormalities were dose-limiting at doses greater than 2.5 mg/m2 per day. Four of six patients developed DLT at 3.0 mg/m2 per day, whereas two of 12 patients treated at 2.5 mg/m2 per day developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of dose and similar on days 1 and 5. Volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was 7.6 +/- 2.0 L/m2, clearance 0.49 +/- 0.18 L/h/m2, and elimination half-life (t1/2) 12.3 +/- 3.8 hours. Peak concentrations (Cmax) on day 1 related to mean percentage decrement in neutrophils (sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model). Patients who experienced dose-limiting neutropenia had significantly higher Cmax values than patients who did not, whereas nonhematologic DLTs were more related to dose. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II evaluations of LU103793 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks is 2.5 mg/m2 per day. The lack of prohibitive cardiovascular effects and the generally acceptable toxicity profile support the rationale for performing disease-directed evaluations of LU103793 on the schedule evaluated in this study.     

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus-E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion history

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a highly active antineoplastic agent; however, grade IV leukopenia occurs in the large majority of patients treated with a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Recent experience with weekly paclitaxel has demonstrated a bone marrow-sparing effect when a weekly administration schedule is used. We investigated a weekly schedule of docetaxel in an attempt to alter the toxicity profile and improve the therapeutic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced, refractory malignancy entered this phase I trial between October 1996 and June 1997. Docetaxel was administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated at the following dose levels: 20, 25, 30, 36, 43, and 52 mg/m2. Patients were reevaluated after one course (8 weeks); patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment for a maximum of four courses or until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed at least one course of therapy. Myelosuppression was not a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at any of the doses tested. Only five episodes of grade III leukopenia occurred (14% of patients, 2% of doses), and no grade IV leukopenia was produced. No grade III or IV thrombocytopenia or anemia was observed. Grade III fatigue and asthenia were observed in all three patients treated at 52 mg/m2/wk and in two of 10 at 43 mg/m2/wk. Other grade III toxicity included acral erythema (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The DLTs of this docetaxel schedule are fatigue and asthenia. Although the maximum-tolerated dose by definition of this study was 43 mg/m2/wk, we selected 36 mg/m2/wk for ongoing phase II studies. CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of docetaxel is markedly altered when the drug is administered by a weekly schedule. Myelosuppression is mild and uncommon. Fatigue and asthenia are the DLTs; other nonhematologic toxicities, which included peripheral edema and neuropathy, are uncommon, and the arthralgia/myalgia syndrome was not observed. Weekly administration of docetaxel may provide a better tolerated, efficacious use of this drug; further investigation of weekly docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens is warranted.