Mn-based borohydride synthesized by ball-milling KBH4 and MnCl2 for hydrogen storage

In this work, a mixed-cation borohydride (K₂Mn(BH₄)₄) with P2₁/n structure was successfully synthesized by mechanochemical milling of the 2KBH₄–MnCl₂ sample under argon. The structural and thermal decomposition properties of the borohydride compounds were investigated using XRD, Raman spectroscopy, FTIR, TGA-MS and DSC. Apart from K₂Mn(BH₄)₄, the KMnCl₃ and unreacted KBH₄ compounds were present in the milled 2KBH₄–MnCl₂. The two mass loss regions were observed for the milled sample: one was from 100 to 160 °C with a 1.6 ± 0.1 wt% loss (a release of majority hydrogen and trace diborane), which was associated with the decomposition of K₂Mn(BH₄)₄ to form KBH₄, boron, and finely dispersed manganese; the other was from 165 to 260 °C with a 1.9 ± 0.1 wt% loss (only hydrogen release), which was due to the reaction of KBH₄ with KMnCl₃ to give KCl, boron, finely dispersed manganese. Simultaneously, the formed KCl could dissolve in KBH₄ to yield a K(BH₄)_xCl_1−x solid solution, and also react with KMnCl₃ to form a new compound K₄MnCl₆.     

On the decomposition of the 0.6LiBH4-0.4Mg(BH4)2 eutectic mixture for hydrogen storage

The dehydrogenation reaction of the 0.6LiBH₄-0.4Mg(BH₄)₂ eutectic system was investigated by Temperature-Programmed-Desorption and Pressure-Composition-Isotherm methods, in the range of 25–540 °C and 0.1–150 bar of p(H₂). A sequence of four decomposition steps was found by TPD measurements; they occur at 235, 315, 365 and 460 °C for p(H₂) = 3 bar, with a clear T decrease with respect to pure LiBH₄ and Mg(BH₄)₂. In the PCI experiments, the first two steps could not be resolved but appeared merged in a single process. The amounts of H₂ release at each step and the Δ_rH and Δ_rS values derived from van’t Hoff plots were analyzed and compared with known results for relevant possible reactions. A scheme of interpretation was then proposed for all four processes. In particular, a fraction of LiBH₄ and Mg(BH₄)₂ would react together in the range of 300–350 °C according to 2LiBH₄ + Mg(BH₄)₂ → 2B + 2LiH + MgB₂ + 7H₂, thus explaining the quite large H₂ yield therein observed. The first and fourth steps correspond to decompositions of pure remaining Mg(BH₄)₂ and LiBH₄, respectively, and the third one to dehydrogenation of MgH₂ produced in the first step.     

The effect of milling energy input and molar ratio on the dehydrogenation and thermal conductivity of the (LiNH2 + nMgH2) (n = 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0) nanocomposites

Hydride nanocomposites in the (LiNH₂ + nMgH₂) system have been synthesized by ball milling with varying input of milling energy injected into powder particles, Q_TR (kJ/g). The grain (crystallite) size of LiNH₂ and MgH₂ decreases rapidly with increasing Q_TR up to approximately 150–200 kJ/g and subsequently more or less saturates at the value of 10–20 nm. For the injected energy Q_TR ≈ 250–350 kJ/g the specific surface area (SSA) increases from the initial 2.4 m²/g for powder mixtures before milling to 30–37 m²/g for nanocomposites after milling. After injecting Q_TR ≈ 550 kJ/g there is a further increase of SSA to 52 m²/g which is over 20-fold increase of SSA from its initial value. That clearly indicates that a profound reduction of particle size has occurred. The hydride phases formed during ball milling with relatively low Q_TR are identified as a-Mg(NH₂)₂ (amorphous magnesium imide) and LiH. The ball milled (LiNH₂ + nMgH₂) nanocomposite system with n = 0.5–0.9 can effectively desorb about 4–5 wt.% H₂ with a reasonable rate at the temperature range close to 200 °C. Within a low temperature range up to ∼250 °C, regardless of the molar ratio n and the injected energy Q_TR the thermal desorption of the (LiNH₂ + nMgH₂) nanocomposites occurs without any release of ammonia, NH₃. For all molar ratios, n, the hydride nanocomposites are fully reversible at 175 °C under a relatively mild pressure of 50 bar H₂. The quantity of H₂ desorbed decreases with increasing molar ratio n, due to increasing fraction of inactive, retained MgH₂. However, at 125 °C the dehydrogenation rate is very sluggish and the quantity of released H₂ is minimal. At the temperature range lower than ∼250 °C dehydrogenation of ball milled nanocomposites occurs through formation of the Li₂Mg(NH)₂ hydride phase. The value of the measured dehydrogenation enthalpy change of 46.7 kJ/molH₂ is relatively low and apparently, it is not responsible for sluggish dehydrogenation at 125 °C. The measurements of thermal conductivity for non-milled powders and ball milled nanocomposites show a dramatic reduction of thermal conductivity after ball milling. It seems that this could be a principal factor responsible for such a low dehydrogenation rate at low temperatures.     

Reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH4/Ca(AlH4)2 systems

To improve the hydrogen storage property of LiBH₄, the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ reactive systems with various ratios were constructed, and their de-/hydrogenation properties as well as the reaction mechanisms were investigated experimentally. It was found that the sample with the LiBH₄ to Ca(AlH₄)₂ molar ratio of 6:1 exhibits the best comprehensive hydrogen storage properties, desorbing hydrogen completely (8.2 wt.%) within 35 min at 450 °C and reversibly absorbing 4.5 wt.% of hydrogen at 450 °C under a hydrogen pressure as low as 4.0 MPa. During the first dehydrogenation process of the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ systems, the CaH₂ and Al particles were in situ precipitated via the self-decomposition of Ca(AlH₄)₂, and then reacted with LiBH₄ to form CaB₆, AlB₂ and LiH. Whereafter, the sample can cycle between LiBH₄ + Ca(BH₄)₂ + Al in the hydrogenated state and CaB₆ + AlB₂ + LiH in the dehydrogenated state.     

The effect of milling energy input during mechano-chemical activation synthesis (MCAS) of the nanocrystalline manganese borohydride (Mn(BH4)2) on its thermal dehydrogenation properties

A manganese borohydride, Mn(BH₄)₂, co-existing with a nanocrystalline LiCl salt, which is a reaction “dead-weight” byproduct, was successfully synthesized by the mechano-chemical activation synthesis (MCAS) during ball milling the (nLiBH₄ + MnCl₂) mixtures having the molar ratios n = 2 and 3, using the total milling energy input, Q_TR, from 36.4 to 364 kJ/g. The crystallite (grain) size of the synthesized nanocrystalline Mn(BH₄)₂ hydride attains 21 ± 5.0 nm for the energy input Q_TR = 36.4 kJ/g and then it is further reduced to 18 ± 1.0 nm for Q_TR = 145.6 kJ/g and finally to 14 ± 0.5 nm for Q_TR = 364 kJ/g. The crystallite (grain) size of LiCl is very close to 30 nm regardless of the milling energy input, Q_TR. During continuous heating in a Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC), Mn(BH₄)₂ decomposes in endothermic reaction releasing H₂ and forming amorphous Mn and B in the process. The synthesized nanocrystalline Mn(BH₄)₂ hydride, co-existing with a nanocrystalline LiCl salt, is capable of desorbing up to ∼ 4.5 wt.% at 100 °C. The values of the apparent activation energy for dehydrogenation obtained in the present work are very low. The apparent activation energy for the n = 3 nanocomposite decreases monotonically from ∼70 to ∼59 kJ/mol with increasing milling energy input whereas the apparent activation energy for the n = 2 nanocomposite decreases from about 65 kJ/mol for Q_TR = 36.4 kJ/g to about 53 kJ/mol for Q_TR = 145.6 kJ/g and then again increases to ∼59 kJ/mol for the Q_TR = 364 kJ/g. These changes closely follow the variations in the average powder particle size obtained with the varying milling energy input. For the milling energy input Q_TR = 36.4 and 145.6 kJ/g the average powder particle size decreases to 14.9 ± 6.6 and 7.5 ± 2.6 μm, respectively, and subsequently increases reaching the average size of 16.1 ± 6.3 μm for the milling energy input Q_TR = 364 kJ/g. On the other hand, the apparent activation energy for dehydrogenation doesn't depend on the average crystallite (grain) size. The amorphous Mn and B elements are also formed after isothermal dehydrogenation. The synthesized Mn(BH₄)₂ hydride is very stable and doesn't excessively release H₂ during a long-term storage at room temperature for over 120 days under a slight overpressure of argon.     

Reversible hydrogen storage from 6LiBH4-MCl3 (M = Ce, Gd) composites by in-situ formation of MH2

Different destabilized LiBH₄ systems with several interacting components are being explored for hydrogen storage applications. In this study, hydrogen sorption properties of as-milled 6LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites (M = Ce, Gd) are investigated by X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and thermovolumetric measurements. The chemical interaction between metal halides and LiBH₄ decreases the dehydrogenation temperature in comparison with as-milled LiBH₄. Hydrogen release starts at 220 °C from the decomposition of M(BH₄)₃ formed during milling and proceeds through destabilization of LiBH₄ by in-situ formed MH₂. The dehydrogenation products CeB₆-LiH and GdB₄-LiH can be rehydrided under moderate conditions, i.e 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 2 h without catalyst. A new 6LiBH₄-CeCl₃-3LiH composite shows promissory hydrogen storage properties via the formation by milling of CeH_2+x. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites destabilized by in-situ formed MH₂.     

Preparation and dehydrogenation properties of two cobalt-based ammine borohydrides: CoCl3·3NH3/3LiBH4 and CoCl2·3NH3/2LiBH4

Two new cobalt-based ammine borohydrides were prepared via ball milling of LiBH₄ and CoCl_n·3NH₃ (n = 3, 2) with molar ratios of 3:1 and 2:1, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) results revealed the as-prepared composites having amorphous state. Thermogravimetric analysis-mass spectrometry (TG-MS) measurements showed that the two composites mainly release H₂, concurrent with the evolution of a small amount of NH₃. Further results showed that the excessive addition of LiBH₄ can suppress the liberation of NH₃, resulting in the release of H₂ with a high purity (>99 mol.%). By combination with the temperature-programmed-desorption (TPD) results, the CoCl₃·3NH₃/4LiBH₄ and CoCl₂·3NH₃/3LiBH₄composites can release 7.3 wt.% (4.2 wt.% including LiCl) and 4.2 wt.% (2.0 wt.% including LiCl) pure hydrogen, respectively, in the temperature range of 25–300 °C. Isothermal dehydrogenation results reveal that CoCl₃·3NH₃/3LiBH₄ shows favorable dehydrogenation rate at low temperatures, releasing about 5.2 wt.% (2.9 wt.% including LiCl) of hydrogen within 45 min at 80 °C.     

Enhanced hydrogen desorption from the Co-catalyzed LiBH4–Mg(BH4)2 eutectic composite

Co-based catalyst can significantly improve the dehydrogenation kinetics of the eutectic composite of LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂ (1/1 M ratio). The onset hydrogen desorption temperature of the composite is at about 155 °C, which is ca. 245, 110 or 27 °C lower than that of LiBH₄, Mg(BH₄)₂ or pristine LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂, respectively. Upon holding the samples at 270 °C, the Co catalyzed composite can release hydrogen at a rate 1.6 times faster than that of the pristine one. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) characterization evidenced that Co was in a reduced state of Co⁺ which may serve as the functional species in catalyzing the dehydrogenation of the composite.     

Mechanistic investigations on significantly improved hydrogen storage performance of the Ca(BH4)2-added 2LiNH2/MgH2 system

The hydrogen storage properties and mechanisms of the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system were systematically investigated. The results showed that the addition of Ca(BH₄)₂ pronouncedly improved hydrogen storage properties of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system. The onset temperature for dehydrogenation of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.3Ca(BH₄)₂ sample is only 80 °C, a ca. 40 °C decline with respect to the pristine sample. Further hydrogenation examination indicated that the dehydrogenated 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.1Ca(BH₄)₂ sample could absorb ca. 4.7 wt% of hydrogen at 160 °C and 100 atm while only 0.8 wt% of hydrogen was recharged into the dehydrogenated pristine sample under the same conditions. Structural analyses revealed that during ball milling, a metathesis reaction between Ca(BH₄)₂ and LiNH₂ firstly occurred to convert to Ca(NH₂)₂ and LiBH₄, and then, the newly developed LiBH₄ reacted with LiNH₂ to form Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃. Upon heating, the in situ formed Ca(NH₂)₂ and Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃ work together to significantly decrease the operating temperatures for hydrogen storage in the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system.     

Effect of the presence of chlorides on the synthesis and decomposition of Ca(BH4)2

Calcium borohydride is one of the most interesting compounds for solid-state hydrogen storage, in particular because of its high hydrogen capacity. In this paper, the synthesis of Ca(BH₄)₂ by metathesis reaction via ball milling of a mixture of LiBH₄ and CaCl₂ is described. The effectiveness of this synthesis technique and the possible substitution of Cl ions in the borohydride phases is analysed depending on the back-pressure used for milling. When performed by ball milling under Ar, the metathesis reaction is not successful. A large quantity of a solid solution Li(BH₄)_1−xCl_x remains in the sample and CaHCl is formed rather than Ca(BH₄)₂. In contrast, the use of H₂ back-pressure during milling favours the borohydride phases rather than CaHCl and leads to the formation of a solid solution Ca(BH₄)_2-yCl_y where [BH₄]⁻ groups are partially substituted by Cl ions. This compound has a similar structure as β-Ca(BH₄)₂ but with smaller lattice parameters. It is present in the as-milled sample together with LiCl and Li(BH₄)_1−xCl_x. The decomposition of the mixture occurs at lower temperature than for pure LiBH₄ but higher than for pure Ca(BH₄)₂. The presence of chlorides in the structure of borohydride compounds changes dramatically the thermal properties of the material prepared and should be considered each time a metathesis reaction is used for synthesis.     

The effects of ball milling and nanometric nickel additive on the hydrogen desorption from lithium borohydride and manganese chloride (3LiBH4 + MnCl2) mixture

A mixture of [3LiBH₄ + MnCl₂] was processed by high energy ball milling in ultra-high purity hydrogen gas for 0.5 and 1 h. The XRD patterns of milled powders show the sole diffraction peaks of LiCl. The reaction occurring during milling of [3LiBH₄ + MnCl₂] seems to have all characteristics of the metathesis-type reactions occurring between borohydrides (LiBH₄ and NaBH₄) and metal chlorides (MCl_n) induced in a solid state by a mechano-chemical activation synthesis (MCAS). Under pressure of 0.1 MPa H₂ (atmospheric) the ball milled [3LiBH₄ + MnCl₂] mixture is able to desorb ∼4.0 wt.% H₂ at 100 °C within 21,000 s and ∼4.5 wt.% H₂ at 120 and 200 °C within 8000 s and 4000 s, respectively. The addition of n-Ni with SSA = 60.5 m²/g allows desorption of ∼3.7wt.%H₂ within 8,700 s at 100 °C. This is one of the highest H₂ desorption capacities obtained for a complex hydride at 100 °C under atmospheric pressure of H₂ taking into account the fact that the microstructure contains some amount of a useless LiCl constituent. The activation energy of hydrogen desorption for a ball milled undoped [3LiBH₄ + MnCl₂] is ∼102 kJ/mol and ∼98 and 92 kJ/mol after doping with 5 wt.% of nanometric Ni having specific surface area (SSA) of 9.5 and 60.5 m²/g, respectively. After volumetric desorption from 100 to 450 °C the XRD patterns show only LiCl. The n-Ni additive slightly lowers the total quantity of desorbed H₂. Re-absorption tests, under pressure of 10 MPa H₂ at 200 °C, show that the system is, most likely, irreversible. Flammability studies show that the ball milled [3LiBH₄ + MnCl₂] mixture can be ignited by scraping the cylinder walls with a metal tool as well when it is thrown and dispersed in air in a powder form. It also reacts violently in contact with water and a nitric acid.     

Improved hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH4 destabilized by Y(BH4)3 and YH3

In the present study, the synthesis of two different LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ and LiBH₄–YH₃ composites was performed by mechanochemical processing of the 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ mixture and as-milled 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ plus 3LiH. It was found that Y(BH₄)₃ and YH₃ formed in situ during milling are effective to promote LiBH₄ destabilization but differ substantially from each other in terms of the dehydrogenation pathway. During LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ dehydriding, Y(BH₄)₃ decomposes first generating in situ freshly YH₃ and subsequently, it destabilizes LiBH₄ with the formation of minor amounts of YB₄. About 20% of the theoretical hydrogen storage was obtained via the rehydriding of YB₄–4LiH–3LiCl at 400 °C and 6.5 MPa. As a novel result, a compound containing (B₁₂H₁₂)²⁻ group was identified during dehydriding of Y(BH₄)₃. In the case of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ dehydrogenation, the increase of the hydrogen back pressure favors the formation of crystalline YB_4, whereas a reduction to ≤0.1 MPa induces the formation of minor amounts of Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Although for hydrogen pressures ≤0.1 MPa direct LiBH₄ decomposition can occur, the main dehydriding pathway of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ composite yields YB₄ and LiH. The nanostructured composite obtained by mechanochemical processing gives good hydrogen storage reversibility (about 80%) regardless of the hydrogen back pressure.     

First-principles study of LiBH4 nanoclusters interaction with models of porous carbon and silica scaffolds

Density functional theory calculations of an interaction of LiBH₄ represented by n = 2−6 and 12 formula units nanoclusters with models of activated carbon and porous silica show that on both non-defective substrates only physisorption is observed for all cluster sizes. The binding energies are low, reaching up to −43 kJ/mol for smallest clusters. The charge transfer between LiBH₄ and the support is not observed. On defective graphene (LiBH₄)₂ may adsorbed dissociatively. Hydrogens detached from BH₄ groups saturates under-coordinated C atoms while the binding between BH₃ moiety and underlying C atoms restores sp³-hybridization in the BH₄ group. The dissociative adsorption of LiBH₄ clusters leads to the retrieval of the three-fold coordination of the C atoms, the subsequent (LiBH₄)₂ physisorps with the differential heat of adsorption not exceeding −46 kJ/mol. The present calculations indicate that chemical interaction between matrix and lithium borohydride, leading to a destabilization of LiBH₄, takes place until substrate's defects remain unsaturated.     

LiBH4·NH3BH3: A new lithium borohydride ammonia borane compound with a novel structure and favorable hydrogen storage properties

Mechanically milling ammonia borane and lithium borohydride in equivalent molar ratio results in the formation of a new complex, LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃. Its structure was successfully determined using combined X-ray diffraction and first-principles calculations. LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ was carefully studied in terms of its decomposition behavior and reversible dehydrogenation property, particularly in comparison with the component phases. In parallel to the property examination, X-ray diffraction and Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy techniques were employed to monitor the phase evolution and bonding structure changes in the reaction process. Our study found that LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ first disproportionates into (LiBH₄)₂·NH₃BH₃ and NH₃BH₃, and the resulting mixture exhibits a three-step decomposition behavior upon heating to 450 °C, totally yielding ∼15.7 wt% hydrogen. Interestingly, it was found that h-BN was formed at such a moderate temperature. And owing to the in situ formation of h-BN, LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ exhibits significantly improved reversible dehydrogenation properties in comparison with the LiBH₄ phase.     

Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 modified by NbF5

In this work, the hydriding–dehydriding properties of the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures were investigated. It was found that the dehydrogenation and reversibility properties of LiBH₄ were significantly improved by NbF₅. Temperature-programed dehydrogenation (TPD) showed that 5LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample started releasing hydrogen from as low as 60 °C, and 4 wt.% hydrogen could be obtained below 255 °C. Meanwhile, ∼7 wt.% H₂ could be reached at 400 °C in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample, whereas pristine LiBH₄ only released ∼0.7 wt.% H₂. In addition, reversibility measurement demonstrated that over 4.4 wt.% H₂ could still be released even during the fifth dehydrogenation in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample. The experimental results suggested that a new borohydride possibly formed during ball milling the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures might be the source of the active effect of NbF₅ on LiBH₄.     

Effect of Al on the hydrogen storage properties of Mg(BH4)2

The various Mg–B–Al–H systems composed of Mg(BH₄)₂ and different Al-sources (metallic Al, LiAlH₄ and its decomposition products) have been investigated as potential hydrogen storage materials. The role of Al was studied on the dehydrogenation and the rehydrogenation of the systems. The results indicate that the different Al-sources exhibit a similar improving effect on the dehydrogenation properties of Mg(BH₄)₂. Taking the Mg(BH₄)₂ + LiAlH₄ system as an example, at first LiAlH₄ rapidly decomposes into LiH and Al, then Mg(BH₄)₂ decomposes into MgH₂ and B, finally the MgH₂ reacts with Al, LiH and B, which forms Mg₃Al₂ and MgAlB₄. The system starts to desorb H₂ at 140 °C and desorbs 3.6 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C, while individual Mg(BH₄)₂ starts to desorb H₂ at 250 °C and desorbs only 1.3 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C. The isothermal desorption kinetics of the Mg–B–Al–H systems is about 40% faster than that of Mg(BH₄)₂ at the hydrogen desorption ratio of 90%. In addition, the Mg–B–Al–H systems show partial reversibility at moderate temperature and pressure. For Al-added system, the product of rehydrogenation is MgH₂, while for LiAlH₄-added system the product is composed of LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Hydrogen generation from the ball milled composites of sodium and lithium borohydride (NaBH4/LiBH4) and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) without and with the nanometric nickel (Ni) additive

The composites of (NaBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) and (LiBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) without and with nanometric Ni (n-Ni) added as a potential catalyst were synthesized by high energy ball milling. The ball milled NaBH₄-based composite desorbs hydrogen in one exothermic reaction in contrast to its LiBH₄-based counterpart which dehydrogenates in two reactions: an exothermic and endothermic. The NaBH₄-based composite starts desorbing hydrogen at 240 °C. Its ball milled LiBH₄-based counterpart starts desorbing at 200 °C. The latter initially desorbs hydrogen rapidly but then the rate of desorption suddenly decelerates. The estimated apparent activation energy for the NaBH₄-based composite without and with n-Ni is equal to 152 ± 2.2 and 157 ± 0.9 kJ/mol, respectively. In contrast, the apparent activation energy for the initial rapid dehydrogenation for the LiBH₄-based composite is very low being equal to 47 ± 2 and 38 ± 9 kJ/mol for the composite without and with the n-Ni additive, respectively. XRD phase studies after volumetric isothermal dehydrogenation tests show the presence of NaBO₂ and MgO for the NaBH₄-based composite. For the LiBH₄-based composite phases such as MgO, Li₃BO₃, MgB₂, MgB₆ are the products of the first exothermic reaction which has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 8.1 wt.%. However, for reasons which are not quite clear, the first reaction never goes to full completion even at 300 °C desorbing ∼4.5 wt.% H₂ at this temperature. The products of the second endothermic reaction for the LiBH₄-based composite are MgO, MgB₆, B and LiMgBO₃ and the reaction has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 2.26 wt.%. The effect of the addition of 5 wt.% nanometric Ni on the dehydrogenation behavior of both the NaBH₄-and LiBH₄-based composites is rather negligible. The n-Ni additive may not be the optimal catalyst for these hydride composite systems although more tests are required since only one n-Ni content was examined.     

Synthesis and dehydrogenation of LiCa(NH2)3(BH3)2

We report the synthesis of a new hydrogen storage material with a composition of LiCa(NH₂)₃(BH₃)₂. The theoretical hydrogen capacity of LiCa(NH₂)₃(BH₃)₂ is 9.85 wt.%. It can be prepared by ball milling the mixture of calcium amidoborane (Ca(NH₂BH₃)₂) and lithium amide (LiNH₂) in a molar ratio of 1:1. The experimental results show that this material starts to release hydrogen at a temperature as low as ca. 50 °C, which is ca. 70 °C lower than that of pure Ca(NH₂BH₃)₂ possibly resulting from the active interaction of NH₂⁻ in LiNH₂ with BH₃ in Ca(NH₂BH₃)₂. ca. 4.1 equiv. or 6.8 wt.% hydrogen can be released at 300 °C. The dehydrogenation is a mildly exothermic process forming stable nitride products.     

Destabilization of LiBH4 by MH2 (M = Ce, La) for hydrogen storage: Nanostructural effects on the hydrogen sorption kinetics

Destabilization of LiBH₄ by addition of metal hydrides or borohydrides is a powerful strategy to develop new promising hydrogen storage systems. In this study, we compare the destabilization behavior of the LiBH₄ by addition of MH₂ (M = La, Ce). A notable improvement in the hydrogen desorption temperature, the rate and the weight percentage of hydrogen released is observed for LiBH₄-MH₂ with respect to LiBH₄. Formation of LaB₆ and CeB₆ after dehydriding of the composites is proved by PXRD. Remarkable hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is confirmed under moderate conditions: 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 4 h without catalyst. The LiBH₄-LaH₂ composite exhibits improved hydrogen desorption performance compared with LiBH₄-CeH₂ composite, but the hydrogen storage reversibility is inferior. Notably, the LiBH₄-CeH₂ nanocomposite produced by in situ formation of CeH₂ from Ce(BH₄)₃-LiH displays excellent hydrogen storage properties. The addition of ZrCl₄ as a catalyst improves dehydriding kinetics. The mechanism underlying the enhancement in the LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is also discussed. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-LaH₂.