Mg2FeH6–LiBH4 and Mg2FeH6–LiNH2 composite materials for hydrogen storage

Two composite hydrogen storage materials based on Mg₂FeH₆ were investigated for the first time. The Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ composite of molar ratio 1:5 showed a hydrogen desorption capacity of 5.6 wt.% at 370 °C, and could be rehydrogenated to 3.6 wt.% with the formation of MgH₂, as the material was heated to 445 °C and held at this temperature. The Mg₂FeH₆–LiNH₂ composite of 3:10 molar ratio exhibited a hydrogen desorption capacity of 4.3 wt.% and released hydrogen at 100 °C lower then the Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ composite, but this mixture could not be rehydrogenated. Compared to neat Mg₂FeH₆, both composites show enhanced hydrogen storage properties in terms of desorption kinetics and capacity at these low temperatures. In particular, Mg₂FeH₆–LiNH₂ exhibits a much lower desorption temperature than neat Mg₂FeH₆, but only Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ re-absorbs hydrogen.     

Effects of nano additives on hydrogen storage behavior of the multinary complex hydride LiBH4/LiNH2/MgH2

Multinary complex hydrides comprised of borohydrides, amides and metal hydrides have been synthesized using the solid state mechano-chemical process. After the optimization of the system, it was found that LiBH₄/LiNH₂/MgH₂ exhibits potential reversible hydrogen storage behavior (>6 wt.%) at temperatures of 125–175 °C. To further improve the hydrogen performance of the system, various nano additives namely, nickel, cobalt, iron, copper, and manganese were investigated. It was observed that some of these additives (Co, Ni) lowered the hydrogen release temperature at least 75–100 °C in the major hydrogen decomposition step. While other additives acted as catalysts and increased the rate at which hydrogen was released. Combinatorial addition of selected materials were also investigated and found to have both a positive effect on kinetics and reduction in hydrogen desorption temperature.     

Improved hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 doped Li–N–H system

Remarkable improvement of hydrogen sorption properties of Li–N–H system has been obtained by doping with a small amount of LiBH₄. The starting and ending temperatures of hydrogen desorption shift to lower temperatures and the release of NH₃ is obviously restrained by 10 mol% LiBH₄ doping. The kinetics of hydrogen desorption and absorption of Li–N–H system became faster by the addition of LiBH₄. About 4 wt.% H₂ can be released within 30 min and ∼4.8 wt.% H₂ can be reabsorbed within 2 min by LiBH₄ doped sample at 250 °C, while only 1.44 wt.% H₂ is released and 2.1 wt.% is reabsorbed for pure Li–N–H system. The quaternary hydride (LiNH₂)_x(LiBH₄)_(1−x) formed by the reaction between LiBH₄ and LiNH₂ may contribute to the enhancement of the hydrogen sorption performances by yielding a ionic liquid phase and transferring LiNH₂ from solid state to molten state with a weakened N–H bond.     

NH3BH3/LiBH4·NH3 modified by metal hydrides for advanced dehydrogenation

The significantly enhanced dehydrogenation performance of binary complex system, NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃, were achieved through a chemical modification of LiH to form ternary composites of x (LiH–NH₃BH₃)/LiBH₄·NH₃. Among the studied composites, 3LiH–3NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃ released ca. 10 wt. % high-pure hydrogen (>99.9 mol%) below 100 °C with fast kinetics, while less than 8 wt. % hydrogen, accompanied with a fair number of volatile byproducts, were released from 3NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃ at the same conditions. Further investigations revealed that the hydrogen emission from x (LiH–NH₃BH₃)/LiBH₄·NH₃ composites is based on the combination mechanism of H^δ+ and H^δ− through the interaction between LiH–NH₃BH₃ and NH₃ group in LiBH₄·NH₃, in which the controllable protic hydrogen source from the stabilized NH₃ group played a crucial role in providing optimal stoichiometric ratio of H^δ+ and H^δ−, and thus leading to the significant improvement of dehydrogenation capacity and purity.     

Hydrogen sorption in MgH2-based composites: The role of Ni and LiBH4 additives

In the present work we investigate the hydrogen sorption properties of composites in the MgH₂–Ni, MgH₂–Ni–LiH and MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ systems and analyze why Ni addition improve hydrogen sorption rates while LiBH₄ enhance the hydrogen storage capacity. Although all composites with Ni addition showed significantly improved hydrogen storage kinetics compared with the pure MgH₂, the fastest hydrogen sorption kinetics is obtained for Ni-doped MgH₂. The formation of Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ in Ni-doped MgH₂ composite and its microstructure allows to uptake 5.0 wt% of hydrogen in 25 s and to release it in 8 min at 275 °C. In the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite, decomposition of LiBH₄ occurs during the first dehydriding leading to the formation of diborane, which has a Ni catalyst poison effect via the formation of a passivating boron layer. A combination of FTIR, XRD and volumetric measurements demonstrate that the formation of MgNi₃B₂ in the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite happens in the subsequent hydriding cycle from the reaction between Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ and B. Activation energy analysis demonstrates that the presence of Ni particles has a catalytic effect in MgH₂–Ni and MgH₂–Ni–LiH systems, but it is practically nullified by the addition of LiBH₄. The beneficial role of LiBH₄ on the hydrogen storage capacity of the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite is discussed.     

Preparation and dehydrogenation properties of two cobalt-based ammine borohydrides: CoCl3·3NH3/3LiBH4 and CoCl2·3NH3/2LiBH4

Two new cobalt-based ammine borohydrides were prepared via ball milling of LiBH₄ and CoCl_n·3NH₃ (n = 3, 2) with molar ratios of 3:1 and 2:1, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) results revealed the as-prepared composites having amorphous state. Thermogravimetric analysis-mass spectrometry (TG-MS) measurements showed that the two composites mainly release H₂, concurrent with the evolution of a small amount of NH₃. Further results showed that the excessive addition of LiBH₄ can suppress the liberation of NH₃, resulting in the release of H₂ with a high purity (>99 mol.%). By combination with the temperature-programmed-desorption (TPD) results, the CoCl₃·3NH₃/4LiBH₄ and CoCl₂·3NH₃/3LiBH₄composites can release 7.3 wt.% (4.2 wt.% including LiCl) and 4.2 wt.% (2.0 wt.% including LiCl) pure hydrogen, respectively, in the temperature range of 25–300 °C. Isothermal dehydrogenation results reveal that CoCl₃·3NH₃/3LiBH₄ shows favorable dehydrogenation rate at low temperatures, releasing about 5.2 wt.% (2.9 wt.% including LiCl) of hydrogen within 45 min at 80 °C.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 modified by NbF5

In this work, the hydriding–dehydriding properties of the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures were investigated. It was found that the dehydrogenation and reversibility properties of LiBH₄ were significantly improved by NbF₅. Temperature-programed dehydrogenation (TPD) showed that 5LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample started releasing hydrogen from as low as 60 °C, and 4 wt.% hydrogen could be obtained below 255 °C. Meanwhile, ∼7 wt.% H₂ could be reached at 400 °C in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample, whereas pristine LiBH₄ only released ∼0.7 wt.% H₂. In addition, reversibility measurement demonstrated that over 4.4 wt.% H₂ could still be released even during the fifth dehydrogenation in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample. The experimental results suggested that a new borohydride possibly formed during ball milling the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures might be the source of the active effect of NbF₅ on LiBH₄.     

Improved hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH4 destabilized by Y(BH4)3 and YH3

In the present study, the synthesis of two different LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ and LiBH₄–YH₃ composites was performed by mechanochemical processing of the 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ mixture and as-milled 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ plus 3LiH. It was found that Y(BH₄)₃ and YH₃ formed in situ during milling are effective to promote LiBH₄ destabilization but differ substantially from each other in terms of the dehydrogenation pathway. During LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ dehydriding, Y(BH₄)₃ decomposes first generating in situ freshly YH₃ and subsequently, it destabilizes LiBH₄ with the formation of minor amounts of YB₄. About 20% of the theoretical hydrogen storage was obtained via the rehydriding of YB₄–4LiH–3LiCl at 400 °C and 6.5 MPa. As a novel result, a compound containing (B₁₂H₁₂)²⁻ group was identified during dehydriding of Y(BH₄)₃. In the case of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ dehydrogenation, the increase of the hydrogen back pressure favors the formation of crystalline YB_4, whereas a reduction to ≤0.1 MPa induces the formation of minor amounts of Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Although for hydrogen pressures ≤0.1 MPa direct LiBH₄ decomposition can occur, the main dehydriding pathway of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ composite yields YB₄ and LiH. The nanostructured composite obtained by mechanochemical processing gives good hydrogen storage reversibility (about 80%) regardless of the hydrogen back pressure.     

Enhanced dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation properties of LiBH4 catalyzed by graphene

The investigation of thermally induced dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ reveals that LiBH₄ doped with the graphene catalysts shows superior dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation performance to that of Vulcan XC-72, carbon nanotube and BP2000 doped LiBH₄. For doping with 20 wt.% graphene, thermal dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ is found to start at ca. 230 °C and a total weight loss of 11.4 wt.% can be obtained below 700 °C. With increased loading of graphene within a LiBH₄ sample, the onset dehydrogenation temperature and the two main desorption peaks from LiBH₄ are found to decrease while the hydrogen release amount is found to increase. Moreover, variation of the equilibrium pressure obtained from isotherms measured at 350–450 °C indicate the dehydrogenation enthalpy is reduced from 74 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ for pure LiBH₄ to ca. 40 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ for 20 wt.% graphene doped LiBH₄. Importantly, the reversible dehydrogenation/rehydrogenation process was achieved under 3 MPa H₂ at 400 °C for 10 h, with a capacity of ca. 4.0 wt.% in the tenth cycle. Especially, LiBH₄ is reformed and new species, Li₂B₁₀H₁₀, is detected after the rehydrogenation process.     

Mechanistic investigations on significantly improved hydrogen storage performance of the Ca(BH4)2-added 2LiNH2/MgH2 system

The hydrogen storage properties and mechanisms of the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system were systematically investigated. The results showed that the addition of Ca(BH₄)₂ pronouncedly improved hydrogen storage properties of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system. The onset temperature for dehydrogenation of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.3Ca(BH₄)₂ sample is only 80 °C, a ca. 40 °C decline with respect to the pristine sample. Further hydrogenation examination indicated that the dehydrogenated 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.1Ca(BH₄)₂ sample could absorb ca. 4.7 wt% of hydrogen at 160 °C and 100 atm while only 0.8 wt% of hydrogen was recharged into the dehydrogenated pristine sample under the same conditions. Structural analyses revealed that during ball milling, a metathesis reaction between Ca(BH₄)₂ and LiNH₂ firstly occurred to convert to Ca(NH₂)₂ and LiBH₄, and then, the newly developed LiBH₄ reacted with LiNH₂ to form Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃. Upon heating, the in situ formed Ca(NH₂)₂ and Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃ work together to significantly decrease the operating temperatures for hydrogen storage in the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4-MgH2 composite by the catalytic effect of MoCl3

Though LiBH₄-MgH₂ system exhibits an excellent hydrogen storage property, it still presents high decomposition temperature over 350 °C and sluggish hydrogen absorption/desorption kinetics. In order to improve the hydrogen storage properties, the influence of MoCl₃ as an additive on the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation properties of LiBH₄-MgH₂ system is investigated. The reversible hydrogen storage performance is significantly improved, which leads to a capacity of about 7 wt.% hydrogen at 300 °C. XRD analysis reveals that the metallic Mo is formed by the reaction between LiBH₄ and MoCl₃, which is highly dispersed in the sample and results in improved dehydrogenation and hydrogenation performance of LiBH₄-MgH₂ system. From Kissinger plot, the activation energy for hydrogen desorption of LiBH₄-MgH₂ system with additive MoCl₃ is estimated to be ∼43 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂, 10 kJ mol⁻¹ lower than that for the pure LiBH₄-MgH₂ system indicating that the kinetics of LiBH₄-MgH₂ composite is significantly improved by the introduction of Mo.     

Effect of Al on the hydrogen storage properties of Mg(BH4)2

The various Mg–B–Al–H systems composed of Mg(BH₄)₂ and different Al-sources (metallic Al, LiAlH₄ and its decomposition products) have been investigated as potential hydrogen storage materials. The role of Al was studied on the dehydrogenation and the rehydrogenation of the systems. The results indicate that the different Al-sources exhibit a similar improving effect on the dehydrogenation properties of Mg(BH₄)₂. Taking the Mg(BH₄)₂ + LiAlH₄ system as an example, at first LiAlH₄ rapidly decomposes into LiH and Al, then Mg(BH₄)₂ decomposes into MgH₂ and B, finally the MgH₂ reacts with Al, LiH and B, which forms Mg₃Al₂ and MgAlB₄. The system starts to desorb H₂ at 140 °C and desorbs 3.6 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C, while individual Mg(BH₄)₂ starts to desorb H₂ at 250 °C and desorbs only 1.3 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C. The isothermal desorption kinetics of the Mg–B–Al–H systems is about 40% faster than that of Mg(BH₄)₂ at the hydrogen desorption ratio of 90%. In addition, the Mg–B–Al–H systems show partial reversibility at moderate temperature and pressure. For Al-added system, the product of rehydrogenation is MgH₂, while for LiAlH₄-added system the product is composed of LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Reversibility aspect of lithium borohydrides

Reversibility is one of the key features for any hydrogen storage material. Borohydrides such as LiBH₄ have been studied or proposed as candidates for hydrogen storage because of their high hydrogen contents (18.4 wt% for LiBH₄). Limited success has been made in reducing the dehydrogenation temperature. However, full reversibility has not been realized. It is found that the dehydrogenation mechanism of metal borohydrides differs signicantly from the well-known metal hydrides such as LaNi₅H₆ and MgH₂ that release hydrogen in a single decomposition step through a solid state transformation of crystalline structure. The dehydrogenation of lithium borohydrides involves solid–liquid–gas reactions. Some of the steps in the multiple step decomposition processes of metal borohydrides are not reversible. Furthermore, the decomposition also produces stable intermediate compounds that cannot be rehydrided easily. Lastly, the volatile gases, such as BH₃ and B₂H₆, evolved in decomposition of the transition metal borohydrides cause unrecoverable boron loss. Although our experiments show the partial reversibility of the doped LiBH₄, it was not sustainable during dehydriding–rehydriding cycles because of the accumulation of hydrogen inert species and boron loss. Doping with additives reduces the stability of LiBH₄, but it also makes LiBH₄ less reversible. It raises reasonable doubt on the feasibility of making metal borohydrides suitable for reversible hydrogen storage.     

Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Enhanced hydrogen desorption from the Co-catalyzed LiBH4–Mg(BH4)2 eutectic composite

Co-based catalyst can significantly improve the dehydrogenation kinetics of the eutectic composite of LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂ (1/1 M ratio). The onset hydrogen desorption temperature of the composite is at about 155 °C, which is ca. 245, 110 or 27 °C lower than that of LiBH₄, Mg(BH₄)₂ or pristine LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂, respectively. Upon holding the samples at 270 °C, the Co catalyzed composite can release hydrogen at a rate 1.6 times faster than that of the pristine one. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) characterization evidenced that Co was in a reduced state of Co⁺ which may serve as the functional species in catalyzing the dehydrogenation of the composite.     

Electronic and dehydrogenation properties of TiB2 cluster-doped NaAlH4 (101) surface: A first-principle approach

The crystal structures, electronic and dehydrogenation properties of TiB₂ cluster-doped NaAlH₄ (101) surface have been investigated by the first-principles density functional theory method. In the TiB₂ cluster-doped NaAlH₄ (101) surface, a Ti-centered TiB₂–Al₂H₈–AlH₅–AlH₃ complex is observed, and the AlH₃ and (AlH₅)²⁻ units in the TiB₂–Al₂H₈–AlH₅–AlH₃ favor the first-step decomposition reaction of NaAlH₄. The calculated electronic properties show that B–Ti bonds are stronger than B–Al and Ti–H bonds, which demonstrates that TiB₂ does not change its configuration in catalyzing the decomposition reaction of NaAlH₄. The results of hydrogen desorption energies imply that the import of TiB₂ makes the strength of Al–H bonds decreases. Therefore, the removal of H atoms, especially the removal of H atoms in the Ti–H–Al bonds is easier in the TiB₂ cluster-doped NaAlH₄ than in pure NaAlH₄.     

Improved hydrogen storage performance of the LiNH2–MgH2–LiBH4 system by addition of ZrCo hydride

Significant improvements in the hydrogen absorption/desorption properties of the 2LiNH₂–1.1MgH₂–0.1LiBH₄ composite have been achieved by adding 3wt% ZrCo hydride. The composite can absorb 5.3wt% hydrogen under 7.0 MPa hydrogen pressure in 10 min and desorb 3.75wt% hydrogen under 0.1 MPa H₂ pressure in 60 min at 150 °C, compared with 2.75wt% and 1.67wt% hydrogen under the same hydrogenation/dehydrogenation conditions without the ZrCo hydride addition, respectively. TPD measurements showed that the dehydrogenation temperature of the ZrCo hydride-doped sample was decreased about 10 °C compared to that of the pristine sample. It is concluded that both the homogeneous distribution of ZrCo particles in the matrix observed by SEM and EDS and the destabilized N–H bonds detected by IR spectrum are the main reasons for the improvement of H-cycling kinetics of the 2LiNH₂–1.1MgH₂–0.1LiBH₄ system.     

The reactions in LiBH4-NaNH2 hydrogen storage system

Stepwise reactions were observed in the ball milling and heating process of the LiBH₄-NaNH₂ system by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR). During the ball milling process, two concurrent reactions take place in the mixture: 3LiBH₄ + 4NaNH₂ → Li₃Na(NH₂)₄ + 3NaBH₄ and LiBH₄ + NaNH₂ → LiNH₂ + NaBH₄. The heating process from 50 °C to 400 °C is mainly the concurrent reactions of Li₃Na(NH₂)₄ + 3LiBH₄ → 2Li₃BN₂ + NaBH₄ + 8H₂ and 2LiNH₂ + LiBH₄ → Li₃BN₂H₈ → Li₃BN₂ + 4H₂, where the intermediate phases Li₃Na(NH₂)₄ and LiNH₂ serve as the reagents to decompose LiBH₄. The merged equations for the mechanochemical and the heating reactions below 400 °C can be denoted as 3LiBH₄ + 2NaNH₂ → Li₃BN₂ + 2NaBH₄ + 4H₂. The maximum dehydrogenation capacity in closed system below 400 °C is 5.1 wt.% H₂, which agrees well with the theoretical capacity (5.5 wt.% H₂) of the merged equation and thus demonstrates the suggested pathway. The subsequent step consists of the decompositions of NaBH₄ and Li₃Na(NH₂)₄ within the temperature range of 400 °C-600 °C. The apparent activation energies of the two steps are 114.8 and 123.5 kJ/mol, respectively. They are all lower than that of our previously obtained bulk LiBH₄.     

Hydrogen generation from the ball milled composites of sodium and lithium borohydride (NaBH4/LiBH4) and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) without and with the nanometric nickel (Ni) additive

The composites of (NaBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) and (LiBH₄+2Mg(OH)₂) without and with nanometric Ni (n-Ni) added as a potential catalyst were synthesized by high energy ball milling. The ball milled NaBH₄-based composite desorbs hydrogen in one exothermic reaction in contrast to its LiBH₄-based counterpart which dehydrogenates in two reactions: an exothermic and endothermic. The NaBH₄-based composite starts desorbing hydrogen at 240 °C. Its ball milled LiBH₄-based counterpart starts desorbing at 200 °C. The latter initially desorbs hydrogen rapidly but then the rate of desorption suddenly decelerates. The estimated apparent activation energy for the NaBH₄-based composite without and with n-Ni is equal to 152 ± 2.2 and 157 ± 0.9 kJ/mol, respectively. In contrast, the apparent activation energy for the initial rapid dehydrogenation for the LiBH₄-based composite is very low being equal to 47 ± 2 and 38 ± 9 kJ/mol for the composite without and with the n-Ni additive, respectively. XRD phase studies after volumetric isothermal dehydrogenation tests show the presence of NaBO₂ and MgO for the NaBH₄-based composite. For the LiBH₄-based composite phases such as MgO, Li₃BO₃, MgB₂, MgB₆ are the products of the first exothermic reaction which has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 8.1 wt.%. However, for reasons which are not quite clear, the first reaction never goes to full completion even at 300 °C desorbing ∼4.5 wt.% H₂ at this temperature. The products of the second endothermic reaction for the LiBH₄-based composite are MgO, MgB₆, B and LiMgBO₃ and the reaction has a theoretical H₂ capacity of 2.26 wt.%. The effect of the addition of 5 wt.% nanometric Ni on the dehydrogenation behavior of both the NaBH₄-and LiBH₄-based composites is rather negligible. The n-Ni additive may not be the optimal catalyst for these hydride composite systems although more tests are required since only one n-Ni content was examined.     

NEXAFS study of 2LiF–MgB2 composite

Synthesis of lithium borohydridofluorides may pave a new way to pursue improved hydrogen storage properties of LiBH₄ as reversible hydrogen storage materials that fit the fuel cell application. The main products of the hydrogen absorption by 2LiF–MgB₂ composite are MgF₂ and LiBH₄. In addition to them, LiBH_4−xF_x compounds might be present during hydrogen absorption–desorptions and play important role on their kinetics and reversibility.