Thermal properties of Y(BH4)3 synthesized via two different methods

Y(BH₄)₃ is one of the candidates for solid-state hydrogen storage, which contains 9.06 wt% of hydrogen. In this study, the thermal properties of Y(BH₄)₃ synthesized via two different methods are extensively examined. One method relies on the solid–solid metathesis reaction between LiBH₄ and YCl₃, and the other method is the gas–solid reaction between B₂H₆ and YH₃. The two samples are studied by differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, and X-ray diffraction. They exhibit distinctly different polymorphic phase transformation and melting. It turns out that the side product LiCl in the metathesis reaction, which has been regarded as being inert, shifts the melting point and promotes the formation of YB₄ during decomposition. Differential scanning calorimetry and in situ X-ray diffraction data indicate that the addition of LiBH₄ to Y(BH₄)₃ induces co-melting as is found in the cases of LiBH₄–Ca(BH₄)₂ or LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂. Melt infiltration of Y(BH₄)₃ into mesoporous carbon cage confirms such melting behavior.     

Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Enhanced dehydrogenation properties of LiBH4 compositing with hydrogenated magnesium-rare earth compounds

LiBH₄ is regarded as a promising hydrogen storage material due to its high hydrogen density. In this study, the dehydrogenation properties of LiBH₄ were remarkably enhanced by doping hydrogenated Mg₃RE compounds (RE denotes La, Ce, Nd rare earth metals), which are composed of nanostructured MgH₂ and REH_2+x (denoted as H − Mg₃RE). For the LiBH₄ + H − Mg₃La mixture, the component LiBH₄ desorbed 6 wt.% hydrogen even at a relatively low temperature of 340 °C, far lower than the desorption temperature of pure LiBH₄ or the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ system. This kinetic improvement is attributed to the hydrogen exchange mechanism between the H − Mg₃La and LiBH₄, in the sense that the decomposition of MgH₂ and LaH_2+x catalyzed the dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ through hydrogen exchange effect rather than mutual chemical reaction requiring higher temperature and hydrogen pressure. However, prior to fast hydrogen release, the hydrogen exchange effect suppressed the dehydriding of MgH₂ and elevated its desorption temperature. It is expected to strengthen the hydrogen exchange effect by compositing the LiBH₄ with other nanosized metal hydrides and to obtain better dehydrogenation properties.     

Hydrogen storage performance of 5LiBH4 + Mg2FeH6 composite system

The hydrogen storage properties of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ reactive hydride composites for reversible hydrogen storage were investigated by comparing with the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ composite in the present work. The dehydrogenation pathway and reaction mechanism of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite were also investigated and elucidated. The self-decomposition of Mg₂FeH₆ leads to the in situ formation of Mg and Fe particles on the surface of LiBH₄, resulting in a well dispersion between different reacting phases. The formation of FeB is observed during the dehydrogenation of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite, which might supplies nucleation sites of MgB₂ during the dehydrogenation process, but is not an ascendant catalyst for the self-decomposition of LiBH₄. And FeB can also transform to the LiBH₄ and Fe by reacting with LiH and H₂ during the rehydrogenation process. The dehydrogenation capacity for 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite still gets to 6.5 wt% even after four cycles. The X-ray diffraction analyses reveal the phase transitions during the hydriding and dehydriding cycle. The formed FeB in the composite maintains a nanostructure after four hydriding-dehydriding cycles. The loss of hydrogen storage capacity and de-/rehydrogenation kinetics can be attributed to the incomplete generation of Mg₂FeH₆ during the rehydrogenation process.     

NH3BH3/LiBH4·NH3 modified by metal hydrides for advanced dehydrogenation

The significantly enhanced dehydrogenation performance of binary complex system, NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃, were achieved through a chemical modification of LiH to form ternary composites of x (LiH–NH₃BH₃)/LiBH₄·NH₃. Among the studied composites, 3LiH–3NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃ released ca. 10 wt. % high-pure hydrogen (>99.9 mol%) below 100 °C with fast kinetics, while less than 8 wt. % hydrogen, accompanied with a fair number of volatile byproducts, were released from 3NH₃BH₃/LiBH₄·NH₃ at the same conditions. Further investigations revealed that the hydrogen emission from x (LiH–NH₃BH₃)/LiBH₄·NH₃ composites is based on the combination mechanism of H^δ+ and H^δ− through the interaction between LiH–NH₃BH₃ and NH₃ group in LiBH₄·NH₃, in which the controllable protic hydrogen source from the stabilized NH₃ group played a crucial role in providing optimal stoichiometric ratio of H^δ+ and H^δ−, and thus leading to the significant improvement of dehydrogenation capacity and purity.     

Enhanced hydrogen desorption from the Co-catalyzed LiBH4–Mg(BH4)2 eutectic composite

Co-based catalyst can significantly improve the dehydrogenation kinetics of the eutectic composite of LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂ (1/1 M ratio). The onset hydrogen desorption temperature of the composite is at about 155 °C, which is ca. 245, 110 or 27 °C lower than that of LiBH₄, Mg(BH₄)₂ or pristine LiBH₄–Mg(BH₄)₂, respectively. Upon holding the samples at 270 °C, the Co catalyzed composite can release hydrogen at a rate 1.6 times faster than that of the pristine one. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) characterization evidenced that Co was in a reduced state of Co⁺ which may serve as the functional species in catalyzing the dehydrogenation of the composite.     

Reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH4/Ca(AlH4)2 systems

To improve the hydrogen storage property of LiBH₄, the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ reactive systems with various ratios were constructed, and their de-/hydrogenation properties as well as the reaction mechanisms were investigated experimentally. It was found that the sample with the LiBH₄ to Ca(AlH₄)₂ molar ratio of 6:1 exhibits the best comprehensive hydrogen storage properties, desorbing hydrogen completely (8.2 wt.%) within 35 min at 450 °C and reversibly absorbing 4.5 wt.% of hydrogen at 450 °C under a hydrogen pressure as low as 4.0 MPa. During the first dehydrogenation process of the LiBH₄/Ca(AlH₄)₂ systems, the CaH₂ and Al particles were in situ precipitated via the self-decomposition of Ca(AlH₄)₂, and then reacted with LiBH₄ to form CaB₆, AlB₂ and LiH. Whereafter, the sample can cycle between LiBH₄ + Ca(BH₄)₂ + Al in the hydrogenated state and CaB₆ + AlB₂ + LiH in the dehydrogenated state.     

Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4 modified by NbF5

In this work, the hydriding–dehydriding properties of the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures were investigated. It was found that the dehydrogenation and reversibility properties of LiBH₄ were significantly improved by NbF₅. Temperature-programed dehydrogenation (TPD) showed that 5LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample started releasing hydrogen from as low as 60 °C, and 4 wt.% hydrogen could be obtained below 255 °C. Meanwhile, ∼7 wt.% H₂ could be reached at 400 °C in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample, whereas pristine LiBH₄ only released ∼0.7 wt.% H₂. In addition, reversibility measurement demonstrated that over 4.4 wt.% H₂ could still be released even during the fifth dehydrogenation in 20LiBH₄–NbF₅ sample. The experimental results suggested that a new borohydride possibly formed during ball milling the LiBH₄–NbF₅ mixtures might be the source of the active effect of NbF₅ on LiBH₄.     

Improvement of hydrogen-storage properties of MgH2 by Ni,LiBH4, and Ti addition

In this work, differently from our previous work, MgH₂ instead of Mg was used as a starting material. Ni, Ti, and LiBH₄ with a high hydrogen-storage capacity of 18.4 wt% were added. A sample with a composition of MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti was prepared by reactive mechanical grinding. MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti after reactive mechanical grinding contained MgH₂, Mg, Ni, TiH_1.924, and MgO phases. The activation of MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti for hydriding and dehydriding reactions was not required. At the number of cycles, n = 2, MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti absorbed 4.09 wt% H for 5 min, 4.25 wt% H for 10 min, and 4.44 wt% H for 60 min at 573 K under 12 bar H₂. At n = 1, MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti desorbed 0.13 wt% H for 10 min, 0.54 wt% H for 20 min, 1.07 wt% H for 30 min, and 1.97 wt% H for 60 min at 573 K under 1.0 bar H₂. The PCT (Pressure–Composition–Temperature) curve at 593 K for MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti showed that its hydrogen-storage capacity was 5.10 wt%. The inverse dependence of the hydriding rate on temperature is partly due to a decrease in the pressure differential between the applied hydrogen pressure and the equilibrium plateau pressure with the increase in temperature. The rate-controlling step for the dehydriding reaction of the MgH₂–10Ni–2LiBH₄–2Ti at n = 1 was analyzed.     

Study on reversible hydrogen sorption behaviors of a 3NaBH4/HoF3 composite

In this work, the complex hydrogen sorption behaviors in a 3NaBH₄/HoF₃ composite prepared through mechanical milling were carefully investigated, including the reactions occurred during ball milling and de-/rehydrogenation processes. Different from other rear earth fluorides, the HoF₃ can react with NaBH₄ during ball milling, leading to the formations of Na–Ho–F and Na–Ho–BH₄ complex compounds. The first dehydriding of the 3NaBH₄/HoF₃ composite can be divided into 4 steps, including the ion exchange between H⁻ and F⁻, the formation of NaHo(BH₄)₄, the decomposition of NaHo(BH₄)₄ and reaction of NaBH₄ with Na–Ho–F compounds. The final products, HoB₄, HoH₃ and NaF, can be rehydrogenated to generate NaBH₄ and NaHoF₄ with an absorption capacity of 2.3 wt% obtained at 400 °C. Based on the Pressure–Composition–Temperature measurements, the de-/rehydrogenation enthalpies of the 3NaBH₄/HoF₃ composite are determined to be 88.3 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂ and −27.1 kJ mol⁻¹ H₂, respectively.     

Mechanistic investigations on significantly improved hydrogen storage performance of the Ca(BH4)2-added 2LiNH2/MgH2 system

The hydrogen storage properties and mechanisms of the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system were systematically investigated. The results showed that the addition of Ca(BH₄)₂ pronouncedly improved hydrogen storage properties of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system. The onset temperature for dehydrogenation of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.3Ca(BH₄)₂ sample is only 80 °C, a ca. 40 °C decline with respect to the pristine sample. Further hydrogenation examination indicated that the dehydrogenated 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.1Ca(BH₄)₂ sample could absorb ca. 4.7 wt% of hydrogen at 160 °C and 100 atm while only 0.8 wt% of hydrogen was recharged into the dehydrogenated pristine sample under the same conditions. Structural analyses revealed that during ball milling, a metathesis reaction between Ca(BH₄)₂ and LiNH₂ firstly occurred to convert to Ca(NH₂)₂ and LiBH₄, and then, the newly developed LiBH₄ reacted with LiNH₂ to form Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃. Upon heating, the in situ formed Ca(NH₂)₂ and Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃ work together to significantly decrease the operating temperatures for hydrogen storage in the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system.     

Reversible hydrogen storage from 6LiBH4-MCl3 (M = Ce, Gd) composites by in-situ formation of MH2

Different destabilized LiBH₄ systems with several interacting components are being explored for hydrogen storage applications. In this study, hydrogen sorption properties of as-milled 6LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites (M = Ce, Gd) are investigated by X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and thermovolumetric measurements. The chemical interaction between metal halides and LiBH₄ decreases the dehydrogenation temperature in comparison with as-milled LiBH₄. Hydrogen release starts at 220 °C from the decomposition of M(BH₄)₃ formed during milling and proceeds through destabilization of LiBH₄ by in-situ formed MH₂. The dehydrogenation products CeB₆-LiH and GdB₄-LiH can be rehydrided under moderate conditions, i.e 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 2 h without catalyst. A new 6LiBH₄-CeCl₃-3LiH composite shows promissory hydrogen storage properties via the formation by milling of CeH_2+x. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites destabilized by in-situ formed MH₂.     

Effect of Al on the hydrogen storage properties of Mg(BH4)2

The various Mg–B–Al–H systems composed of Mg(BH₄)₂ and different Al-sources (metallic Al, LiAlH₄ and its decomposition products) have been investigated as potential hydrogen storage materials. The role of Al was studied on the dehydrogenation and the rehydrogenation of the systems. The results indicate that the different Al-sources exhibit a similar improving effect on the dehydrogenation properties of Mg(BH₄)₂. Taking the Mg(BH₄)₂ + LiAlH₄ system as an example, at first LiAlH₄ rapidly decomposes into LiH and Al, then Mg(BH₄)₂ decomposes into MgH₂ and B, finally the MgH₂ reacts with Al, LiH and B, which forms Mg₃Al₂ and MgAlB₄. The system starts to desorb H₂ at 140 °C and desorbs 3.6 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C, while individual Mg(BH₄)₂ starts to desorb H₂ at 250 °C and desorbs only 1.3 wt.% H₂ below 300 °C. The isothermal desorption kinetics of the Mg–B–Al–H systems is about 40% faster than that of Mg(BH₄)₂ at the hydrogen desorption ratio of 90%. In addition, the Mg–B–Al–H systems show partial reversibility at moderate temperature and pressure. For Al-added system, the product of rehydrogenation is MgH₂, while for LiAlH₄-added system the product is composed of LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

The enhanced hydrogen storage performance of (Mg–B–N–H)-doped Mg(NH2)–2LiH system

Doping Mg(NH₂)₂–2LiH by Mg₂(BH₄)₂(NH₂)₂ compound exhibits enhanced hydrogen de/re-hydrogenation performance. The peak width in temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) profile for the Mg(NH₂)₂–2LiH–0.1Mg₂(BH₄)₂(NH₂)₂ was remarkably shrunk by 60 °C from that of pristine Mg(NH₂)₂–2LiH, and the peak temperature was lowered by 12 °C from the latter. Its isothermal dehydrogenation rate was greatly improved by five times from the latter at 200 °C. XRD, FTIR and NMR analyses revealed that a series of reactions occurred in the dehydrogenation of the composite. The prior interaction between LiH and Mg–B–N–H yielded intermediate LiBH₄, which subsequently reacted with Mg(NH₂)₂ and LiH in molar ratio of 1:6:9 to form Li₂Mg₂(NH)₃ and Li₄BN₃H₁₀ phases. The observed 6Mg(NH₂)₂–9LiH–LiBH₄ combination dominated the hydrogen release and soak in the composite system, and enhanced the kinetics of the system.     

Significant effects of graphite fragments on hydrogen storage performances of LiBH4: A first-principles approach

The graphite fragments are used to establish the calculated models of LiBH₄ mechanically milled by graphite additive. Density-functional theory calculations have been performed to optimize the crystal structures of LiBH₄ inserted by different graphite fragments. It is found that the unsaturated sites introduced by graphite fragments are occupied by BH₃ complexes and H atoms. The dehydrogenation energies are calculated to investigate the dehydrogenation ability of LiBH₄ with graphite fragments. The results show that BH₃ complexes bonded with graphite fragments have lower dehydrogenation energy than pure LiBH₄, which is an important factor of the improvement of thermodynamic property of LiBH₄ system. The hydrogen diffusion behaviors of graphite fragments doped LiBH₄ are investigated by the nudged elastic band method. It is found that the hydrogen diffusion barriers of β-H (the H atoms of BH₃ complexes bonding with C atoms) diffusing to other sites are small in the LiBH₄/graphite fragment systems. The results show that the existence of β-H type significantly enhances the hydrogen diffusion kinetics of the graphite fragments doped LiBH₄.     

A mixed-cation mixed-anion borohydride NaY(BH4)2Cl2

A new sodium-yttrium borohydride-chloride, NaY(BH₄)₂Cl₂, is obtained by a combination of mechanochemical synthesis and annealing of NaBH₄–YCl₃ mixtures and is characterized by in-situ synchrotron radiation X-ray powder diffraction, density functional theory, thermal analysis and vibrational spectroscopy. Several simultaneous and coupled reactions occur during the synthesis, also yielding Na₃YCl₆ and Na(BH₄)_1−xCl_x besides the title compound. The polymeric pseudo-orthorhombic crystal structure of NaY(BH₄)₂Cl₂ (space group P2/c) is built of edge- and corner-sharing octahedral coordination polyhedra of yttrium (4Cl + 2BH₄) and sodium (2Cl + 4BH₄). The structure is isomorphous to the high temperature polymorph of NaYCl₄. The BH₄ units in NaY(BH₄)₂Cl₂ are located only on the larger of the two independent anion sites in NaYCl₄. Density functional theory optimization of the experimental structure suggests that the BH₄ units act as η³-ligands (face-sharing) towards yttrium and η¹-ligands (corner-sharing) towards sodium. Raman spectroscopy confirms this BH₄ configuration. NaY(BH₄)₂Cl₂ decomposes at ∼300 °C under formation of Na₃YCl₆, while the latter compound at higher temperatures reacts with Na(BH₄)_1−xCl_x to form NaCl and possibly amorphous products. The reactions are associated with mass losses of 2.62 and 3.78 wt% for the NaBH₄–YCl₃ (3:1) and (4:1) samples, respectively.     

Enhanced desorption properties of LiBH4 incorporated into mesoporous TiO2

LiBH₄ nano-particles are incorporated into mesoporous TiO₂ scaffolds via a chemical impregnation method. And the enhanced desorption properties of the composite have been investigated. The LiBH₄/TiO₂ sample starts to release hydrogen at 220 °C and the maximal desorption peak occurs at about 330 °C, much lower compared to the bulk LiBH₄. Furthermore, the composite exhibits excellent dehydrogenation kinetics, with 11 wt% of hydrogen liberated from LiBH₄ at 300 °C within 3 h. X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy are used to confirm the nanostructure of LiBH₄ in the TiO₂ scaffold. This work demonstrates that confinement within active porous scaffold host is a promising approach for enhancing hydrogen decomposition properties of light-metal complex hydrides.     

LiBH4·NH3BH3: A new lithium borohydride ammonia borane compound with a novel structure and favorable hydrogen storage properties

Mechanically milling ammonia borane and lithium borohydride in equivalent molar ratio results in the formation of a new complex, LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃. Its structure was successfully determined using combined X-ray diffraction and first-principles calculations. LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ was carefully studied in terms of its decomposition behavior and reversible dehydrogenation property, particularly in comparison with the component phases. In parallel to the property examination, X-ray diffraction and Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy techniques were employed to monitor the phase evolution and bonding structure changes in the reaction process. Our study found that LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ first disproportionates into (LiBH₄)₂·NH₃BH₃ and NH₃BH₃, and the resulting mixture exhibits a three-step decomposition behavior upon heating to 450 °C, totally yielding ∼15.7 wt% hydrogen. Interestingly, it was found that h-BN was formed at such a moderate temperature. And owing to the in situ formation of h-BN, LiBH₄·NH₃BH₃ exhibits significantly improved reversible dehydrogenation properties in comparison with the LiBH₄ phase.     

Destabilization of LiBH4 by MH2 (M = Ce, La) for hydrogen storage: Nanostructural effects on the hydrogen sorption kinetics

Destabilization of LiBH₄ by addition of metal hydrides or borohydrides is a powerful strategy to develop new promising hydrogen storage systems. In this study, we compare the destabilization behavior of the LiBH₄ by addition of MH₂ (M = La, Ce). A notable improvement in the hydrogen desorption temperature, the rate and the weight percentage of hydrogen released is observed for LiBH₄-MH₂ with respect to LiBH₄. Formation of LaB₆ and CeB₆ after dehydriding of the composites is proved by PXRD. Remarkable hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is confirmed under moderate conditions: 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 4 h without catalyst. The LiBH₄-LaH₂ composite exhibits improved hydrogen desorption performance compared with LiBH₄-CeH₂ composite, but the hydrogen storage reversibility is inferior. Notably, the LiBH₄-CeH₂ nanocomposite produced by in situ formation of CeH₂ from Ce(BH₄)₃-LiH displays excellent hydrogen storage properties. The addition of ZrCl₄ as a catalyst improves dehydriding kinetics. The mechanism underlying the enhancement in the LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is also discussed. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-LaH₂.     

Enhancement of the H2 desorption properties of LiAlH4 doping with NiCo2O4 nanorods

Lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH₄) is considered as an attractive candidate for hydrogen storage owing to its favorable thermodynamics and high hydrogen storage capacity. However, its reaction kinetics and thermodynamics have to be improved for the practical application. In our present work, we have systematically investigated the effect of NiCo₂O₄ (NCO) additive on the dehydrogenation properties and microstructure refinement in LiAlH₄. The dehydrogenation kinetics of LiAlH₄ can be significantly increased with the increase of NiCo₂O₄ content and dehydrogenation temperature. The 2 mol% NiCo₂O₄-doped LiAlH₄ (2% NCO–LiAlH₄) exhibits the superior dehydrogenation performances, which releases 4.95 wt% H₂ at 130 °C and 6.47 wt% H₂ at 150 °C within 150 min. In contrast, the undoped LiAlH₄ sample just releases <1 wt% H₂ after 150 min. About 3.7 wt.% of hydrogen can be released from 2% NCO–LiAlH₄ at 90 °C, where total 7.10 wt% of hydrogen is released at 150 °C. Moreover, 2% NCO–LiAlH₄ displayed remarkably reduced activation energy for the dehydrogenation of LiAlH₄.