Sawtooth-shaped stringiness with front frame formation for polyacrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives with two different molecular structures

The formation of sawtooth-shaped stringiness during 90° peeling was investigated using crosslinked poly(n-butyl acrylate–acrylic acid) and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate–acrylic acid) random copolymers with an acrylic acid content of 5 wt.% and different crosslinking degrees as pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs). The gel fraction was measured by toluene extraction of PSA, and it increased with crosslinker content for both systems. The observed stringiness was sawtooth-shaped, but there were three different types; both the typical sawtooth shape and the frame formed at the front tip with interfacial failure, and the sawtooth shape formed with cohesive failure. The change in the stringiness shape was affected strongly by the gel fraction of PSA. The peel rate under constant peel load was measured and revealed that the peel rate was lowest upon formation of the front frame type. A good relation was found between peel rate and peel strength, with a greater peel strength upon formation of the front frame type. The concentrated stress at the peeling tip is released by progress of peeling and deformation of the adhesive layer (stringiness) for no frame type. On the other hand, the sufficient interfacial adhesion delays the progress of peeling, and the applied larger stress causes cavitation in the PSA layer for front frame type. The formed cavity grows and the front frame type formed as a result. That is, internal deformation occurred preferentially over peeling. In order to improve the peel strength, the front frame type is the most useful stringiness shape.     

Peel Adhesion of Solid Films-The Surface and Bulk Effects

The peel strength of rubber and paint films has been measured over a range of peeling velocities using a dead weight method. At low peel rates the peel force is fairly constant but rises rapidly at higher peeling speeds.

Experiments show that the peel strength is a function both of the energy of interfacial bonds which must be broken as peeling proceeds and of bulk energy losses in a viscoelastic peeling material.

The interfacial effect has two components: an equilibrium surface force which accounts for the peel strength at low velocities, and a viscous peeling force which depends on the peeling rate. This viscous interfacial force explains the increase in peel strength of purely elastic films at higher peeling velocities.

The energy loss in the bulk of the peeling film introduces two additional effects: a magnification of the peel strength in steady peeling over a certain velocity range, and a slowing down or stopping of peeling as transient relaxation occurs shortly after the application of the peel force.     

The Mechanisms of Peeling of Uncross-Linked Pressure Sensitive Adhesives

We analyze the peeling properties of an uncross-linked pressure sensitive adhesive. 90° peeling master curves on Pyrex^TM and PMMA (polymethylmetacrylate) are constructed The shift coefficients a_T are compared with the ones obtained from rheometrical shear tests.

With our machine, the peeling front is kept fixed, enabling us to observe the mechanisms of deformation of the adhesive. We count four different mechanisms of peeling in cohesive failure, and three in interfacial peeling (the last being unstable); they correspond to various slopes that we identify. The flow patterns at slow reduced velocities are two-dimensional. Then they undergo transitions to three-dimensional periodic complex flows, due to instabilities in the flow of thin adhesives. Interpretation of these peeling master curves are discussed in terms of rheology and physico-chemistry. It appears necessary to take into account the elongational properties of the adhesive, as well as the surface energy properties, to predict adhesion.     

Peeling of Acrylic Pressure Sensitive Adhesives: Cross-Linked versus Uncross-Linked Adhesives

In this paper we analyze the adhesive properties of two kinds of adhesives, determined by a 90[ddot] peeling test on a Pyrex^TM substrate. Simultaneously, we observe the mechanisms of flow at the peeling front. An uncross-linked acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive is used, whereas the second one, of the same class, is slightly cross-linked. The mechanisms of peeling are compared with the ones of our previous study (Benyahia et al [8]) and are found to be identical in the case of uncross-linked adhesives. On the other hand, we find new regimes of flow when the adhesive is cross-linked.

To investigate these differences further, we determine the rheometrical properties of the adhesives in dynamic shear tests and in uniaxial elongational experiments. Furthermore, surfaces are characterized.

A discussion of the peeling curves is finally presented, showing the combined effects of the rheological properties and the surface ones. Conditions for predicting the type of regimes and transitions are also investigated.     

Physical Considerations in the Development of Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Sheets

A pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet is a special kind of paper used in non-impact printers which use a heating process to apply toner to paper. As a result, it needs special characteristics that general pressure-sensitive adhesive paper for labels do not require.

One of these characteristics is that the edge of the folded paper used in non-impact printers must not incline after printing. This was done by making the degree of orientation of the fibers in the face stocks and the release liners low.

The other characteristics are that adhesive must not ooze out from the edges during the slitting or guillotining process and that the labels must not come off of the release liner by themselves during the printing process. Ooze characteristics were found to be related to the adhesive coat weight. An adhesive paper with both a high peel strength and lower adhesive coat weight was developed by studying the dynamic viscoelastic properties of adhesives and release layers. The storage modulus of the release layer concerned with the release force was also found to be related to the self-peeling tendency of the labels.

These points were considered during the development of pressure-sensitive adhesive paper used in non-impact printers which use a heating process to apply toner to paper.     

Relationship Between Viscoelastic and Peeling Properties of Model Adhesives. Part 2. The Interfacial Fracture Domains

The viscoelastic and peeling properties of polybutadiene/tackifying resin compatible blends have been studied in detail. Viscoelastic properties have been described through the variations of the complex shear modulus, G*(w), as a function of frequency, W, and peeling properties through the variations of peeling force (F) as a function of peeling rate (V).

The first paper of this series presented the cohesive fracture domain and the present paper explores the interfacial fracture domain: (i) rubbery interfacial (interfacial 1); (ii) stick-slip; (iii) glassy interfacial (interfacial 2). After a general survey of the properties in the three domains we present a quantitative relationship between the peeling and linear viscoelastic properties as a function of the adhesive formulation, discussing the use of time-temperature equivalence for adhesive properties. The third part of the paper presents the trumpet model of de Gennes describing the crack shape and propagation: starting from a mechanical analysis of the peeling test, it is shown how one may calculate the variations of the peeling force as a function of peeling rate in the various interfacial fracture domains: this model defines a single interfacial fracture criterion which coexists with the cohesive fracture criterion defined earlier, whatever the fracture location.

We present as a conclusion a critical discussion of the relevance and physical meaning of such a criterion and present a new outlook for the modeling and improvement of adhesive formulations.     

Peel Strength of Aluminium-Aluminium Joints Bonded by Adhesive Based on Carboxylated Nitrile Rubber-Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

The peel strength of aluminium-aluminium joints bonded by an adhesive based on carboxylated nitrile rubber and chlorobutyl rubber was found to depend on surface topography and use of a silane primer. Anodization causes a marginal increase in bond strength while the silane primer improves the adhesive joint strength remarkably.

The peel strength was also found to be dependent on test conditions (test rate and temperature). The threshold peel strength value obtained by measurements at low peel rate and high test temperature was found to depend on the type of failure during peeling (cohesive or interfacial) which, in turn, is controlled by the presence of silica filler in the adhesive. Two different threshold values of peel strength were obtained: 60 N/m for interfacial failure (in silica-filled adhesive), 140 N/m for cohesive failure (in unfilled adhesive).     

Relationship between Viscoelastic and Peeling Properties of Model Adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive Fracture

The viscoelastic and peeling properties of polybutadiene/tackifying resin compatible blends have been studied in detail. Viscoelastic properties have been described through the variations of the complex shear modulus, G*(ω), as a function of frequency, ω and peeling properties through the variations of peeling force (F) as a function of peeling rate (V).

After showing the objective character of the peeling curves obtained, the variations of the peeling force and peeling geometry have been studied as a function of volume fraction of the tackifying resin.

In this first paper, the analysis is focused on the first domain of the peeling curves, i.e. the cohesive fracture region. In this region, the peeling properties have been related to the viscoelastic properties in the terminal region of relaxation. It is shown that the longest relaxation time, τ_o, is a reducing parameter of the peeling curves, so a peeling master curve-which is independent of temperature, resin volume fraction and polymer molecular weight-may be defined. Furthermore, the variations of the test geometry as a function of peeling rate have been investigated: the variations of the radius of curvature of the aluminium foil have been analyzed with respect to the viscoelastic behavior of the adhesive, which in fact governs the test geometry.

A detailed analysis of all these features leads to a model which allows one to calculate the peeling curves in the cohesive domain from the adhesive formulation.     

Durability of Adhesive Bonds to Zinc-Coated Steels: Effects of Corrosive Environments on Lap Shear Strength

The effects of corrosive environments on adhesive bonds to electro-galvanized, zinc/aluminum alloy coated, coated electro-galvanized, and cold-rolled steels have been investigated. Bonds prepared using a rubber-modified dicyandiamide-cured epoxy adhesive, an epoxy-modified poly(vinyl chloride)-based adhesive, an acrylic-modified poly(vinyl chloride)-based adhesive a one-part urethane adhesive, and a two-component epoxy-modified acrylic adhesive were exposed under no-load conditions to constant high humidity or cyclic corrosion exposure for 50 days or 50 cycles (10 weeks) respectively.

Over the course of this study, exposure to constant high humidity had little effect on lap shear strength for any of the systems studied. Bond failures were initially cohesive, and with few exceptions remained so.

Bond strength retention under the cyclic corrosion exposure conditions employed was strongly dependent on adhesive composition and on substrate type. On galvanized substrates, lap shear strengths for the poly(vinyl chloride)-based adhesives were reduced by 90-100% during the course of the corrosion exposure, and a change in the mode of bond failure (from cohesive to interfacial) was observed. On the coated electro-galvanized steel substrate, the poly(vinyl chloride)-based adhesives showed about 50% retention in lap shear strength and a cohesive failure throughout most of the corrosion test. The dicyandiamide-cured epoxy adhesive used in this study generally showed the best lap shear strength retention to zinc-coated substrates; bonds to cold-rolled steel were severely degraded by corrosion exposure. The performance of the acrylic and urethane adhesives were intermediate to the dicyandiamide-cured epoxy and poly(vinyl chloride)-based adhesives in strength retention.     

Comparison of Peel Tests for Metal-Polymer Laminates for Aerospace Applications

Standard peel tests for aerospace laminates based on metal-polymer systems, namely floating-roller and climbing-drum peel methods, have been accommodated in a unified theory of peeling. This theory also accommodates more basic peel tests such as T-peel and fixed-arm peel and also newer methods such as mandrel peel. These five methods have been applied to two aerospace laminate systems to critically examine their use in the determination of adhesive strength. The theory has been used to unify the outputs from the tests in terms of adhesive fracture toughness. In this way, the comparative merits of the methods can be commented on.

The validity of the standard methods has been put in doubt because of the absence of a correction for plastic bending energy and also because of the poor conformance of the peel arm to the roller system used in these methods. The unified theory and some measurements of peel-arm curvature help but not completely overcome some of these difficulties.

A further complication that arises in peel is a change in the plane of fracture. This reflects a transition from cohesive fracture in the adhesive to an adhesive fracture at the interfaces among adhesive, primer, and substrate. It is likely that such plane-of-fracture phenomena are intrinsic to evaluation of the laminate and that contemplation of cohesive fracture toughness for the adhesive cannot accommodate such events.     

Influence of metallic substrate surface engineering on peel resistance of adhesively bonded polymer film

The peel resistance of adhesively bonded polymer films to a stainless steel sheet substrate (SSSS) with different engineered surface characteristics was examined in two different loading directions and for two different peel speeds. The SSSS was laminated with two thin polymeric adherends using two different pressure-sensitive adhesives. The SSSS surface was altered by grinding and knurling techniques before lamination and the effects of surface alterations on peel resistance were compared with peel resistance of the adherend from as-received SSSS with a bright annealed surface condition. For ground surface, an increase in adherend peel resistance was observed and the increase was attributed to increase in contact area between the adhesive and SSSS surface. For knurled surfaces which involved deeper and less frequent grooves, however, a decrease in peel resistance was observed. This was attributed to a more complex stress state at the peel front in the SSSS groove region during peeling. An increase in peel speed enhanced the peel resistance from both ground and knurled surfaces.     

Peel Test Using Nonstationary Peel Method

The cohesive peel spectra of pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) tapes have been measured using a non-stationary peel tester. The experimental evidence and a viscoelastic analysis based on a peel model indicate that there are no significant effects of acceleration in the normal rate region. The nonstationary peel tester can be regarded as a useful tool for testing and evaluating PSA tapes.     

Peel Test Using Nonstationary Peel Method

The cohesive peel spectra of pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) tapes have been measured using a non-stationary peel tester. The experimental evidence and a viscoelastic analysis based on a peel model indicate that there are no significant effects of acceleration in the normal rate region. The nonstationary peel tester can be regarded as a useful tool for testing and evaluating PSA tapes.     

Mechanisms of Adhesive Failure

In the peeling test of adhesive tapes as well as in other experiments for adhesive failure, the transition of failure modes from cohesive to interfacial has been observed by several workers in the process of increasing rate or decreasing temperature. It is accompanied by an abrupt change of adhesive strength. These facts cannot be explained by the failure mechanism based on a weak boundary layer. (It would be willful to assume two kinds of weak boundary layers). In this paper, the phenomena above referred to and the dependence of adhesive strength on rate, temperature, thickness, and some physical properties of adhesives are attempted to be explained rheologically. The author has proposed a simple model theory to interpret the so-called failure envelope of T. L. Smith, where viscoelastic substances were represented by Maxwell elements connected in parallel and appropriate criteria for failure were introduced to an element, which was considered a weak point in the substance (Zairyo (Materials) 17, 322 1968). In addition to this treatment for cohesive failure, the following new criterion is introduced to the same model; that is, interfacial failure occurs when the elastic work of deformation of the whole system reaches a critical value. The formulae obtained represent the observed behavior at least qualitatively. Other dependence of adhesive strength on the variables aforementioned and the mutual reduction between them are also discussed.     

Development of a Failure Model for the Adhesively Bonded Tubular Single Lap Joint

The accurate calculation of the stresses and torque capacities of adhesively bonded joints is not possible without understanding the failure phenomena of the adhesive joints and the nonlinear behavior of the adhesive.

In this paper, an adhesive failure model of the adhesively bonded tubular single lap joint with steel-steel adherends was proposed to predict the torque capacity accurately.

The model incorporated the nonlinear behavior of the adhesive and the different failure modes in which the adhesive failure mode changed from bulk shear failure, via transient failure, to interfacial failure between the adhesive and the adherend, according to the magnitudes of the residual thermally-induced stresses from fabrication.     

The Maximum Peel Strength of Pressure-Sensitive Styrene-Butadiene Emulsion Polymers

Peel strengths of five pressure-sensitive styrene-butadiene emulsion polymers, having different amounts of gel and different glass transition temperatures, have been determined as a function of temperature and peel rate. For each peel rate, the peel strength reaches a maximum at a particular temperature, and this maximum peel strength is associated with the change of the mode of failure from cohesive to adhesive. The maximum peel strength is found to be largely independent of the gel level and possibly of the glass transition temperature of the polymer within the domain of pressure-sensitive polymeric properties. The maximum peel strength appears to be dependent on the kind of substrates and the stabilization system of the emulsion polymers (surface free energy properties of the bonded interfaces).     

Influence of the degree of crosslinking on the stringiness of crosslinked polyacrylic pressure‐sensitive adhesives

The stringiness of crosslinked polyacrylic pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) was observed during 90° peeling under the constant peel load. The random copolymer of butyl acrylate with 5 wt % acrylic acid crosslinked by N,N,N′,N′‐tetraglycidyl‐m‐xylenediamine was used as PSA. All observed stringiness upon peeling was sawtooth‐shaped, but it could be classified into three types dependent on the degree of crosslinking. The typical sawtooth‐shaped stringiness with interfacial failure was observed at the relatively higher crosslinker content ranging from 0.008 to 0.016 chemical equivalents (Eq.), where the PSA has high cohesive strength and low interfacial adhesion. The frame formed at the front end of stringiness at the content ranging from 0.002 to 0.004 Eq. Sufficient interfacial adhesion and deformability generate large internal deformation of the PSA layer. Internal deformation occurred preferentially over peeling as a result of front frame formation. The mode of peeling was changed from cohesive failure to interfacial failure in this range of crosslinker content. The sawtooth‐shaped with cohesive failure was observed at the lower content ranging from 0 to 0.001 Eq. The PSA has high interfacial adhesion and low cohesive strength, and thus exhibited cohesive failure. The PSA after peeling remained in the shape of belts. It was found that the shape of stringiness is strongly dependent on the balance between the interfacial adhesion and the cohesive strength of PSA. When the sawtooth‐shaped stringiness with frame formed, the peeling rate was lowest. This means the peel strength should be the maximum in this shape of stringiness. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40336.     

Protocols for the Measurement of Adhesive Fracture Toughness by Peel Tests

This article reports on the work of the European Structural Integrity Society Technical Committee 4 (ESIS TC4) and its activities in the development of test protocols for peel fracture. Thirteen laboratories have been working on peel test methods in ESIS TC4 since 1997 and their activities are ongoing.

The aim of the work is to develop robust and credible test methods for the determination of adhesive fracture toughness by peel tests. Several geometric configurations have been used, namely, multi-angle fixed arm peel, T-peel, and roller assisted peel in the form of a mandrel test.

The starting point of their work is an established analysis of a peel method that is often developed from a global energy approach. The adopted analysis is combined with an experimental approach in order to resolve ambiguities in the determination of adhesive fracture toughness (G_A). The test methods involve the measurement of peel strength in order to calculate the total input energy for peel (G) and the calculation of the plastic bending energy (G_P) during peel. The latter is often obtained from a measurement of the tensile behaviour of the peel arm. Adhesive fracture toughness is then G - G_P.

Four ESIS TC4 projects are described. The first relates to fixed arm peel whilst the second and third involve both fixed arm and T-peel. The fourth project combines mandrel peel and fixed arm peel. Each project uses different types of polymeric adhesives in the form of quite different laminate systems. The selection of the laminate system enables all characteristics of laminate property to be embraced, for example, thin and thick adhesive layers, polymeric, and metallic peel arms and a range of flexibility in the laminates.

The development of the enabling science required to establish the test protocols is described and software for conducting all calculations is referenced.     

Peeling of PSAs on Viscoelastic Substrates: A Failure Criterion

This work deals with the study of the viscoelastic and adherence properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) formulations dedicated to medical applications. We have developed a specific viscoelastic substrate to measure the adherence properties of PSAs that mimics adhesion on human skin. In the present article, we describe several experiments dedicated to a better understanding of adhesion on viscoelastic substrates without discussing specifically the case of human skin. In this way, we have studied different model adhesive formulations based on real medical formulations, and we have related the rheological behavior to the adherence properties obtained on different substrates to study the various specific effects due to the viscoelasticity of soft substrates. We propose from this study a failure criterion that allows one to derive a reasonable estimate of the peeling transition rate from cohesive to interfacial or stick-slip failure.     

Peeling of PSAs on Viscoelastic Substrates: A Failure Criterion

This work deals with the study of the viscoelastic and adherence properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) formulations dedicated to medical applications. We have developed a specific viscoelastic substrate to measure the adherence properties of PSAs that mimics adhesion on human skin. In the present article, we describe several experiments dedicated to a better understanding of adhesion on viscoelastic substrates without discussing specifically the case of human skin. In this way, we have studied different model adhesive formulations based on real medical formulations, and we have related the rheological behavior to the adherence properties obtained on different substrates to study the various specific effects due to the viscoelasticity of soft substrates. We propose from this study a failure criterion that allows one to derive a reasonable estimate of the peeling transition rate from cohesive to interfacial or stick–slip failure.