Present status and potential role of geothermal energy in the world

Geothermal energy has come of age as an energy source. It is found in most parts of the world and is harnessed by conventional technology. Commercial production on the scale of hundreds of MW has been undertaken for over three decades both for electricity generation and direct utilization. Some 80 countries have identified geothermal resources, and about 50 have quantifiable geothermal utilization at present. Electricity is produced from geothermal in 21 countries (total production 38 TWh/a) and direct application is recorded in 35 countries (34 TWh/a). Geothermal electricity production is equally common in industrialized and developing countries, but plays a more important role in the latter. Apart from China, direct use is mainly in the industrialized countries and Central and Eastern Europe. Most of the developing countries as well as Central and Eastern European countries still lack trained manpower, but there is a surplus in many industrialized countries. During 1973–1992, investments in geothermal energy amounted to approximately 22 billion USD. The large share of the private sector in the investments shows its confidence in this energy source. Data presented in the WEC Survey of Energy Resources 1995 on the “new renewables” (geothermal, solar, wind, and tidal energy) shows that geothermal has the largest installed electrical capacity (61%) and electricity production (81%) in the world of these four sources.     

Geothermal energy potential related to active volcanism in Indonesia

About 90 thermal areas in Indonesia are indicated, most of which could be grouped into hyperthermal areas located in active volcanic belts. The thermal manifestations are fumaroles, geysers, hot springs and hot mud-pools with surface temperatures generally at boiling point or more than 70°C. A tentative evaluation has been made of the potential of 54 thermal areas with a view to their further development for electrical power. The successful results of these studies in several thermal areas suggest that these volcanic geothermal systems have a high energy potential of about 13,000 – 14,000 MW.The Kawah Kamojang geothermal field in West Jawa is the first promising attempt at utilizing this geothermal energy for electrical power; a 30 MW geothermal power plant has already been installed, and a further 3 units totalling 165 MW are planned.     

Status of geothermal energy amongst the world's energy sources

The world primary energy consumption is about 400 EJ/year, mostly provided by fossil fuels (80%). The renewables collectively provide 14% of the primary energy, in the form of traditional biomass (10%), large (>10 MW) hydropower stations (2%), and the “new renewables” (2%). Nuclear energy provides 6%. The World Energy Council expects the world primary energy consumption to have grown by 50–275% in 2050, depending on different scenarios. The renewable energy sources are expected to provide 20–40% of the primary energy in 2050 and 30–80% in 2100. The technical potential of the renewables is estimated at 7600 EJ/year, and thus certainly sufficiently large to meet future world energy requirements. Of the total electricity production from renewables of 2826 TWh in 1998, 92% came from hydropower, 5.5% from biomass, 1.6% from geothermal and 0.6% from wind. Solar electricity contributed 0.05% and tidal 0.02%. The electricity cost is 2–10 US¢/kWh for geothermal and hydro, 5–13 US¢/kWh for wind, 5–15 US¢/kWh for biomass, 25–125 US¢/kWh for solar photovoltaic and 12–18 US¢/kWh for solar thermal electricity. Biomass constitutes 93% of the total direct heat production from renewables, geothermal 5%, and solar heating 2%. Heat production from renewables is commercially competitive with conventional energy sources. Direct heat from biomass costs 1–5 US¢/kWh, geothermal 0.5–5 US¢/kWh, and solar heating 3–20 US¢/kWh.     

Renewable energy resource potential in Pakistan

Pakistan energy situation is seriously troubling today due to lack of careful planning and implementation of its energy policies. To avoid the worse situation in the years ahead, the country will have to exploit its huge natural renewable resource. In this paper a review is being presented about renewable energy resource potential available in the country to be exploited for useful and consistent energy supplies. On average solar global insolation 5–7 kWh/m²/day, wind speed 5–7.5 m/s, Biogas 14 million m³/day, microhydel more than 600 MW (for small units) with persistency factor of more than 80% over a year exist in the country. Solar and wind maps are presented along with identification of hot spring sites as resource of geothermal energy. The research results presented in this paper are not only useful for government policy makers, executing agencies but also for private sector national and international agencies and stake holders who want to invest in Pakistan for renewable energy projects or business.     

Exploration of Lahendong geothermal field in North Sulawesi, Indonesia

This paper describes the progress made in developing the geothermal resources at Lahendong, North Sulawesi, Indonesia for utilization in power generation. Exploration of the whole region included a geophysical survey undertaken exclusively by the Volcanological Survey of Indonesia (VSI). A temperature survey at various depths was conducted through gradient boreholes. The results show that the area of anomalous temperature corresponds to the area of low resistivity revealed by the seismic survey. Two shallow exploratory boreholes (300–400 m) drilled by VSI confirmed the existence of the resources. The deep reservoir in Lahendong field extends over an area of 10 km²; the upper parts of the reservoir are presumed to be water dominated (temperatures in excess of 200°C) and to overlie a zone of hot chloride water at an undetermined depth. The potential of Lahendong field is estimated to about 90 MW.In Pelita IV (1984–1989), the fourth 5-year plan, the State Electricity Public Corporation plans to construct a 30 MW geothermal power-plant in the Lahendong field.     

Inflow performance relationships in geothermal and petroleum reservoir engineering: A review of the state of the art

The different inflow performance relationships (IPRs) that have been proposed in geothermal and petroleum reservoir engineering are reviewed. The applicability of these relationships to well production tests is analyzed, and the geothermal IPRs for pure water, for the binary H₂O–CO₂ and ternary H₂O–CO₂–NaCl mixtures (with different salinities) are presented. The method to determine the maximum flow rate for a well is described. Two representative IPRs for petroleum systems and two for geothermal systems that consider the fluid as a ternary mixture H₂O–CO₂–NaCl (for salinities less than 5%, and between 5% and 20%) are compared. It is concluded that IPRs may be used to determine the maximum flowrate of a well at any time during its productive life.     

Research and development of geothermal energy production in Hungary

The basement of the Pannonian (Carpathian) basin is represented by Paleozoic metamorphic and Mesozoic dolomite and limestone formations. The Tertiary basin gradually subsided during the Alpine orogeny down to 6000 m and was filled by elastic sediments with several water horizons.A heat flow of 2.0 to 3.4 μcal/cm²s gives temperature gradients between 45 and 70 °C/km in the basin. At 2000 m depth the virgin rock temperature is between 110 and 150°C. 80 geothermal wells about 2000 m deep have shown the great geothermal potential of the basin.The main hot water reservoir is the Upper Pliocene (Pannonian) sandstone formation. Hot water is produced by wells from the blanket or sheet sand and sandstone, intercalated frequently by siltstone. Between a 100–300 m interval, 3 to 8 permeable layers are exploited resulting in 1–3 m³/min hot water at 80–99°C temperature.Wells at present are overflowing with shut-in pressures of 3–5 atm.The Pannonian basin is a conduction-dominated reservoir. Convection systems are negligible, hot igneous systems do not exist. The assessment of geothermal resources revealed that the content of the water-bearing rocks down to 3000 m amounts to 12,600 × 10¹⁸cal. In the Tertiary sediments 10,560 × 10¹⁸cal and in the Upper Pannonian, 1938 × 10¹⁸cal are stored. In the Upper Pannonian geothermal reservoir, below 1000 m, where the virgin rock temperature is between 70 and 140°C, the stored heat is 768 × 10⁸cal. A 10¹⁸ cal is equivalent to the combustion heat of 100 million tons of oil. The amount of recoverable geothermal energy from 768 × 10⁸cal is 7.42 × 10¹⁸cal, i.e. about 10,000 MW century, not considering reinjection.At present the Pannonian geothermal reservoir stores the greatest amount of identified heat which can be mobilized and used. Hungary has 496 geothermal wells with a nominal capacity of 428 m³/min, producing 1342 MW heat. 147 wells have an outflow temperature of more than 60°C producing 190 m³/min, that is, 845 MW. In 1974 290 MWyear of geothermal energy was utilized in agriculture, district heating and industry.     

Indonesian geothermal development in the national energy scenario. Development program to the year 2000

The electric power sector in Indonesia will be expanded with an additional generating capacity of about 5256 MW at the end of the Fourth Five-Year Development Plan 1984/85 — 1988/89 from the existing 3912 MW. At present a 30 MW geothermal condensing plant and two non-condensing of 2 MW and 0.25 MW have been operating successfully since 1983. Geothermal energy will be developed primarily for electric power and a total of 220 MW and 660 MW will be added during the 4th (1984 — 89) and 5th (1989 — 94) Five Year Plans, reaching a total capacity of nearly 1000 MW. The government will accelerate geothermal exploration of 18 areas in Sumatera, 29 in Java, 16 in Sulawesi and 14 areas in Bali, the Lesser Sunda islands and Moluccas.     

Chilean geothermal resources and their possible utilization

Most of the hot spring areas in Chile are located along the Andean Cordillera, associated with Quaternary volcanism. The volcanic—geothermal activity is mainly controlled by the subduction processes of the Nazca and Antarctic oceanic plates under the South America continental plate, and occurs at three well-defined zones of the Chilean Andes: the northern zone (17°30′–28°S), the central—south zone (33φ–46°S) and the southern-most or Austral zone (48°–56°S).Some tested high temperature geothermal fields, and geological and geochemical surveys of many other hot spring areas, evidence a great potential of geothermal resources in this country. Both electrical and non-electrical applications of this potential are considered in this paper.Taking into account the potentially available geothermal resources, the development of natural resources, the geographic and social—economic conditions existing in the different regions of Chile, it is concluded that power generation, desalination of geothermal waters, recovery of chemicals from evaporite deposits and brines and sulfur-refining are the main possible applications of geothermal energy in northern Chile; in central—south Chile geothermal energy is suitable for agribusiness such as greenhouses, aquaculture and animal husbandry.     

Investment cost for geothermal power plants

Stepwise development strategy is considered a suitable method for securing a cost-effective way for the development of geothermal power plants. This strategy has been in use in Iceland for the last decade. Geothermal high-temperature fields are developed in steps of 20–30 MW. About 6 years are required for each step in the development. Parallel development of several fields in a country might be preferable, especially when a rapid increase of the generation capacity is required in that country. The capacity factor of geothermal power plants depends on the mix of power plants serving the electricity grid. Where geothermal power plants can be operated as base load, the capacity factor is usually in excess of 0.9. The investment cost of geothermal power plants is divided into the cost of surface equipment and activities and the cost of subsurface investment. The surface costs include the cost of surface exploration, and the plant and steam-gathering system, while the cost of subsurface investment is that of drilling. Surface equipment costs can be estimated with the same accuracy as other construction works at the surface (buildings, roads, bridges), whereas higher uncertainty might be associated with the cost of drilling. Analyses of the surface costs of five power plants in Iceland show that the investment cost of the surface equipment is linear with size, in the range 20–60 MW. Surface costs were found to be about 1000 USD/kW with a relative error of 10%. Stefánsson (Stefánsson, V., 1992. Success in geothermal development. Geothermics 21, 823–834) published a statistical study of the drilling results in 31 high-temperature fields in the world. Using these results, it is possible to estimate the expectation value and its limits of error for the subsurface investment in an arbtitrary geothermal field. The results obtained for the range 20–60 MW are summarized as follows:

Full-size image

Geothermal development in Hungary—country update report 2000–2002

This paper describes the status of geothermal energy utilization—direct use—in Hungary, with emphasis on developments between 2000 and 2002. The level of utilization of geothermal energy in the world increased in this period and geothermal energy was the leading producer, with 70% of the total electricity production, of all the renewable energy sources (wind, solar, geothermal and tidal), followed by wind energy at 28%. The current cost of direct heat use from biomass is 1–5 US¢/kWh, geothermal 0.5–5 US¢/kWh and solar heating 3–20 US¢/kWh. The data relative to direct use in Hungary decreased in this period and the contribution of geothermal energy to the energy balance of Hungary, despite significant proven reserves (with reinjection) of 380 million m³/year, with a heat content of 63.5 PJ/a at ΔT=40 °C, remained very low (0.25%). Despite the fact that geothermal fluids with temperatures at the surface higher than 100 °C are available, no electricity has been generated. As of 31 December 2002, the geothermal capacity utilised in direct applications in Hungary is estimated to be 324.5 MW_t and to produce 2804 TJ/year. Geothermal heat pumps represent about 4.0 MW_t of this installed capacity. The quantity of thermal water produced for direct uses in 2002 was approximately 22 million m³, with an average utilization temperature of 31 °C. The main consumer of geothermal energy is agriculture (68% of the total geothermal heat dedicated to direct uses). The geothermal water is used only in five spas for space heating and sanitary hot water (SHW), although there are 260 spas in the country, and the thermal water produced has an average surface temperature of 68 °C. The total heat capacity installed in the spas is approximately 1250 MW_t; this is not provided by geothermal but could be, i.e., geothermal could provide more than three times the geothermal capacity utilized in direct uses by 31 December 2002 (324.5 MW_t).     

The Iceland Deep Drilling Project: a search for deep unconventional geothermal resources

The Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP) is a long-term program to improve the economics of geothermal energy by producing supercritical hydrous fluids from drillable depths. Producing supercritical fluids will require the drilling of wells and the sampling of fluids and rocks to depths of 3.5–5 km, and at temperatures of 450–600 °C. The IDDP plans to drill and test a series of such deep boreholes in the Krafla, Nesjavellir and Reykjanes geothermal fields in Iceland. Beneath these three developed high-temperature systems frequent seismic activity continues below 5 km, indicating that, even at supercritical temperatures, the rocks are brittle and therefore likely to be permeable, even where the temperature is assumed to exceed 550–650 °C. Temperature gradients are greater and fluid salinities smaller at Nesjavellir and Krafla than at Reykjanes. However, an active drilling program is underway at Reykjanes to expand the existing generating capacity and the field operator has offered to make available one of a number of 2.5 km deep wells to be the first to be deepened to 5 km by the IDDP. In addition to its potential economic significance, drilling deep at this location, on the landward extension of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, is of great interest to the international science community. This paper examines the prospect of producing geothermal fluids from deep wells drilled into a reservoir at supercritical temperatures and pressures. Since fluids drawn from a depth of 4000–5000 m may prove to be chemically hostile, the wellbore and casing must be protected while the fluid properties are being evaluated. This will be achieved by extracting the fluids through a narrow retrievable liner called the “pipe”. Modelling indicates that if the wellhead enthalpy is to exceed that of conventionally produced geothermal steam, the reservoir temperature must be higher than 450 °C. A deep well producing 0.67 m³/s steam (2400 m³/h) from a reservoir with a temperature significantly above 450 °C could, under favourable conditions, yield enough high-enthalpy steam to generate 40–50 MW of electric power. This exceeds by an order of magnitude the power typically obtained from a conventional geothermal well in Iceland. The aim of the IDDP is to determine whether utilization of heat from such an unconventional geothermal resource at supercritical conditions will lead to increased productivity of wells at a competitive cost. If the IDDP is an economic success, this same approach could be applied in other high-temperature volcanic geothermal systems elsewhere, an important step in enhancing the geothermal industry worldwide.     

Geothermal development in Nicaragua

In order to meet national energy requirements, Nicaragua has had to direct its attention towards sources of “alternative energy”, such as geothermal. Excellent geothermal prospects exist in this country, for which reason the Revolutionary Government has deemed it convenient to direct its energy policy towards this alternative source. Studies carried out during past years have led to the selection of nine areas in western Nicaragua, four of which were earmarked Very High Priority because they contain high enthalpy geothermal fields, three areas were earmarked High Priority and only two Low Priority. The positive results obtained in the Momotombo geothermal project have become an incentive to continue research and development nation-wide.At present, a power plant is operating with 35 MW at the Momotombo geothermal field; another 35 MW power plant is under construction in the same field; the El Hoyo-Monte Galan project is in the pre-feasibility phase and surveys are under way throughout national territory.     

Philippine geothermal resources: General geological setting and development

The Philippine Archipelago has a composite geologic structure arising from the multi-stage development of volcanic-tectonic events evidenced by volcanism and seismic activity occurring along the active blocks of the major structural lines which traverse most of the major islands of the Philippines.The widespread volcanic activity located along the active tectonic blocks has generated regions of high heat flow, where a vast number of potentially rich geothermal resources could be exploited as an alternative source of energy.As part of a systematic geothermal development program launched by the Philippine government after the successful pilot study at the Tiwi geothermal field in 1967 by the Commission on Volcanology (now called the Philippine Institute of Volcanology—PIV), the Philippines developed four geothermal fields in the period 1972–1984. These four areas, Tiwi in Albay, Mak-Ban in Laguna, Tongonan in Leyte, and Palinpinon in Southern Negros, have already contributed 891 MW installed capacity to the total electrical power supply of the country, which is mainly dependent on oil resources.The Philippines envisaged that, with its accelerated geothermal energy programme, it would be able to achieve its target of reducing the country's dependence on imported fossil fuel by about 20% within the next decade through the utilization of its vast geothermal energy resources.     

Geothermal energy potentials in the province of Vojvodina from the aspect of the direct energy utilization

The interest in increasing the participation of renewable energy sources (RES) in energy production arises with increasing population and growing demands for energy production and consumption, as well as the fact of the limited fossil fuels reserves. RES in the energy balance of any country has their share of energy, socio-economic and environmental benefits. Investment in energy sector in the RES domain enables Vojvodina Province to reduce energy dependence on the fossil fuel market.From the total RES potential in Vojvodina Province that is 1293 ktoe/year, around 1.7% is located in existing geothermal sources. There are 73 drills with a total capacity of 72.6 MW from which 65 drills are tested positive. Currently, 15 wells are in production, with a total power of 17.7 MW. There are 27 drills that have never been in production and which are perspective, with a total power of 42.8 MW.The aim of this paper is to perform data analysis of direct geothermal energy utilization according to the water temperature and geothermal fluid flow. According to the results of the analysis recommendations for geothermal energy utilization are given within certain sectors: agriculture (aquaculture and greenhouses), heating of the facilities and pools, industrial applications and balneology.     

The feasibility of using geothermal energy in hydrogen production

A feasibility study exploring the use of geothermal energy in hydrogen production is presented. It is possible to use a thermal energy to supply heat for high temperature electrolysis and thereby substitute a part of the relatively expensive electricity needed. A newly developed HOT ELLY high temperature steam electrolysis process operates at 800 – 1000°C. Geothermal fluid is used to heat fresh water up to 200°C steam. The steam is further heated to 900°C by utilising heat produced within the electrolyser. The electrical power of this process is reduced from 4.6 kWh per normalised cubic meter of hydrogen (kWh/Nm³ H₂) for conventional process to 3.2 kWh/Nm³ H₂ for the HOT ELLY process implying electrical energy reduction of 29.5%. The geothermal energy needed in the process is 0.5 kWh/Nm³ H₂. Price of geothermal energy is approximately 8–10% of electrical energy and therefore a substantial reduction of production cost of hydrogen can be achieved this way. It will be shown that using HOT ELLY process with geothermal steam at 200°C reduces the production cost by approximately 19%.     

Enel activity in the research, exploration and exploitation of geothermal energy in Italy

In Italy the utilization of geothermal resources for industrial purposes began about 150 years ago. Prior to 1913, geothermal fluids were utilized both as a source of heat and chemical products; from 1913 to 1965, combined chemical and electric production was achieved; from 1965 on, power generation prevailed over chemical production, which was abandoned immediately thereafter; between 1975 and 1984, geothermal energy was mostly used for generating electricity, but a number of thermal projects were also started.An overview is given of Italian geothermal development after 1975, including electric production and direct applications of geothermal heat.More in particular, the research and development activity in the period 1975–1985 is first presented, and the criteria, programmes and development objectives through 1995 are then illustrated.     

Fifty years of geothermal power generation at Wairakei

The challenges and changes that have occurred over the last 50 years of remarkable service from the Wairakei Geothermal Power Project are reviewed. The project was initially constructed during the 1953–1963 period. Plant changes including the decommissioning of the high-pressure turbine generators, the installation of a 3.5-MW intermediate-low pressure steam turbine at the Wairakei Power Station in 1996, the commissioning of the 55 MW Poihipi Power Station in 1997, the 14 MW binary power plant at the Wairakei Power Station in 2005, and a proposed new station to be constructed in the Te Mihi area in 2011–2016 are briefly discussed. Also reviewed are steamfield aspects including steam separation processes, a pilot scheme that was designed to carry hot geothermal water some distance before flash steam generation by pressure reduction, steam production from vapor-dominated regions in the Wairakei reservoir, geothermal water injection, and cascade and direct heat uses. Finally, various aspects of the Wairakei development that have contributed to its success are described. It is anticipated that the geothermal resource will be producing beyond 2028 at generation levels 50% above the current (2008) level.     

Thermal analysis of multigeneration system using geothermal energy as its main power source

The study presented in this paper examines the operation of an integrated system. The study aims to present a method for utilizing geothermal energy in a way that minimizes energy waste and delivers maximum efficiency. A high-temperature geothermal well with a temperature of 300 °C is used as its primary source of energy. The system produces space heating, space cooling, electric power, hot water, freshwater and hydrogen as its outputs. These outputs utilize the excess energy that is obtained from the geothermal well, and by doing so, reduces waste, and increases the overall efficiency of the system. Among these outputs, freshwater and hydrogen are considered the most valuable, as water is an essential life resource and hydrogen is a prized form of energy. The novelty of this system compared to other geothermal sources is that it does not rely on any other source of input energy. It produces both freshwater, hydrogen and considerable amounts of electric power for commercial, industrial and/or residential use. Electric power is produced by two power cycles; the first one is a double flash steam cycle in the geothermal system and the second one is an organic Rankine cycle. 40% of the total electric power produced is sent to an electrolyzer to produce hydrogen gas. Freshwater is produced by single flash desalination. The system produces 22.1 MW of power as net electricity output. The system is assessed energetically and exergetically; it is found that the energy efficiency is 49.1%, while the exergy efficiency is 67.9%. Further parametric studies are carried out using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) to investigate the influence of operating conditions on the energy and exergy of the system. Moreover, major exergy destruction areas in the system are also identified.     

Power generation from geothermal resources in Turkey

This study provides information on power generation via geothermal resources and sector development. The first instance of power generation from geothermal resources was performed by a state-owned power plant at Kızıldere-Denizli, whereas the first private sector investment was the Dora-I power plant, commissioned in 2006. Legislation regulating rights ownership and certification laws was issued in 2007. The installed capacity of the geothermal resources is 311.871 MW for 16 power plants, and power generation licenses were issued for 713.541 MW at the end of 2012. The total potential geothermal power that can be generated in Turkey is estimated to be approximately 2000 MW. The geothermal fields in Turkey produce high levels of greenhouse gases, which have been deemed highly responsible for global warming. Due to high CO₂ emissions, the geothermal energy sector risks a carbon tax in the near future. For certain geothermal resources, multiple investors produce electricity from the same resource. The sector will inevitably experience severe damage unless permanent solutions are devised for problems related to sustainably managing geothermal resources and environmental problems.