Long-term evaluation of the use of coralline hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery

PURPOSE: This prospective study was designed to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) used as a synthetic bone graft in orthognathic surgery and craniofacial augmentation. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: A total of 245 consecutive patients were treated initially. Inclusion criteria for this study included a minimum clinical and radiographic follow-up of 5 years. In addition, all patients with known implant failures were included regardless of whether they met the study criteria. There were 111 patients that met the criteria for inclusion in this study. All patients had undergone orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation and had had inlay or onlay PBHA implants placed. Ninety-six percent of the implants were placed through an intraoral approach. Long-term postoperative radiographs were visually compared with immediate postoperative radiographs for implant position, stability, resorption, and other significant radiographic changes. The clinical examination evaluated for signs and symptoms of infection, wound dehiscence, implant exposure, implant displacement, changes in the overlying mucosa, and development of oronasal or oroantral fistulae. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-one implants were placed: 403 in the maxilla, 44 in the mandible, and 24 in the periorbital region. There were 289 implants placed in direct communication with the maxillary sinus. The average follow-up time was 7.2 years (range, 5.0 to 10.3 years). Twenty-three implants (4.9%) were removed during the evaluation period. Lateral maxillary wall grafting had 95.7% success, with nine implants being lost in three patients. One chin implant was removed because of dissatisfaction with the aesthetics. Seven (14%) midpalatal implants used for maxillary expansion were lost, primarily because of exposure of the implant to the oral or nasal cavity at the time of surgery. When PBHA was used for alveolar cleft grafting, there was a 100% failure rate. CONCLUSION: The use of PBHA as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery and for facial augmentation showed a high percentage of success and efficacy. However, adequate soft tissue coverage in the nasal floor and on the palate are paramount for success of midpalatal implants. PBHA should not be used for alveolar cleft grafting. Rigid fixation for inlay implants in the maxilla is important to provide stress shielding of the material and minimize micromovement during the initial healing phase.     

Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation

In this study, a new approach involving placement and subsequent retrieval of titanium microimplants was employed for the histologic investigation of the implant-tissue interface in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Nine patients scheduled for sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous placement of Br?nemark implants were included in the study. After a sinus graft procedure and placement of implants, an additional microimplant was placed into the graft through the lateral wall of the sinus. At abutment connection, the microimplants were retrieved using a 3- or 5-mm-wide trephine drill. Six specimens were retrieved after 6 to 14 months from sites augmented with particulate radiated mineralized cancellous allograft. Another six implants were retrieved after 6 to 12 months from maxillary sinuses augmented with particulate autogenous bone grafts. The histologic analysis showed distinct differences between the two types of grafts. The sites with autogenous bones grafts displayed a normal morphology of bone and bone marrow, including formation of bone on the surfaces of the grafted particles and remodeling of newly formed as well as grafted bone. The bone was more mature after 11 to 14 months than at 6 months. The allografted sites had a mixed morphologic appearance of newly formed bone and nonviable allograft particles (about 75% of the total bone area) in loose connective tissue. Significantly more bone was found at the autografted than at the allografted implants. The use of autogenous bone for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor resulted in a greater amount of viable bone surrounding the implant; however, simultaneous placement of implants apparently resulted in a low proportion of bone-implant contact after 6 to 14 months irrespective of graft type.     

Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study

Forty-three patients with severely resorbed maxillae who had been referred for implant treatment were assigned to one of three treatment groups: bone grafting and implant placement (graft group); modified implant placement but no bone grafting (trial group); or optimized complete dentures (no-implant group). Sixteen, 20, and 7 patients, respectively, were assigned to the three groups. At the 1-year follow-up, 10% of the implants had been lost. Only a few of the failures (3/22) occurred after prosthesis placement. The cumulative success rates were 83% in the graft group and 96% in the trial group. A substantial reduction of the grafted bone, especially of the onlay grafts, occurred in many patients. During the period from prosthesis connection to the 1-year follow-up, marginal peri-implant bone loss was on average 0.5 mm. Despite the often demanding procedures involved, all but one patient in each implant group said that they would undergo the treatment again. Most patients were very satisfied with the treatment outcome and their improved masticatory ability. Those who had renounced implant treatment appeared modestly adapted to their optimized dentures, but reported retention problems and less satisfaction with mastication.     

Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of anorganic bovine bone matrix (i.e. Bio-oss) as a grafting material for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male rhesus monkeys (i.e. Macaca mulatta) the 1st, 2nd and 3rd maxillary molars on one side of the jaws were extracted. The remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the bottom of the sinus was then reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed on one side of the jaws in each monkey and the sinuses were grafted with the bovine bone matrix. At that time, 2 IMZ pure titanium plasma coated implants were immediately placed into the augmented sinuses (i.e. simultaneous implants-loaded group). After 4 months, 2 additional similar implants were placed into these previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed implants-loaded group). Four months later, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice of the animals). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that the extractions were performed 7 months after those in the opposite side and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous implants-unloaded group and delayed implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded implants were stable at the day of sacrifice. Histologically, the grafted sinuses exhibited significant bone formation with integration of the bovine bone matrix particles to the new bone. Direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater for the delayed implant placement groups than for the implants installed simultaneously with the sinus augmentation. Furthermore, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater in the residual bone than in the augmented area. It was concluded that the anorganic bovine bone matrix facilitated bone formation and implant osseointegration in the augmented sinuses and that the delayed implant placement in combination with the sinus augmentation procedure seemed to be preferable.     

Short-term healing following the use of calcium sulfate as a grafting material for sinus augmentation: a clinical report

Because of the frequent lack of bone in the posterior maxilla, sinus augmentation has become a commonly practiced treatment modality. Many different materials have been used for augmenting the sinus, and the ideal graft is yet to be found. The present article reports the results of sinuses grafted with calcium sulfate in 2 patients. Bone biopsies were harvested 9 months after the augmentation procedure. In the first patient, 3 titanium threaded-cylinder implants were placed in the grafted area after 9 months, while in the second, 1 acid-etched, screw-shaped titanium implant was placed simultaneously with the graft. Light microscopic evaluation revealed new bone formation with ongoing remodeling and progressive lamellar maturation in the specimens. No remnants of the alloplastic material were detectable in any section, either within the bone or in the medullary tissue. When reevaluated at the uncovering procedure, the implants were radiographically and clinically judged to be osseointegrated. These observations suggest that, when used in the appropriate form and with the proper technique, calcium sulfate is a promising graft material for sinus augmentation, producing adequate quantity and quality of new bone for implant placement.     

Biomechanical and histologic alteration of facial recipient bone after reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and alloplastic implants: a 1-year study

Potential alteration of the underlying recipient bone resulting from a graft or implant has significant clinical relevance. The present study was designed to evaluate the biomechanical and histologic alteration of facial recipient bone with autogenous bone graft and alloplastic implants over a 1-year period. The bilateral arches of 15 rabbits were randomized between four groups: (1) control (n = 6), subperiosteal exposure of the zygomatic arch was made; (2) onlay (n = 12), bone graft was placed as an onlay to the zygomatic arch; (3) inlay (n = 6), bone graft was placed as an inlay within the zygomatic arch; (4) implant (n = 6), a stainless steel plate was placed as an onlay to the zygomatic arch. Animals were killed 1 year after grafting. In the onlay groups, all steel implants and half of the onlay bone grafts (n = 6) were separated from the zygomatic arch; the remaining onlay bone grafts (n = 6) were left on the zygomatic arch. Three-point breaking strength was measured through the center of the graft/implant site on the zygomatic arch, followed by histologic evaluation and histometric assessment of residual bone density. The findings demonstrated no difference in the breaking strength per unit bone area between the control zygomatic arch group and the onlay group in which the bone graft was left in place. Breaking strength of the zygomatic arch in the former two groups was significantly greater than that in either group in which the onlay bone graft or implant had been removed, and was also greater than the breaking strength in that group in which inlay bone had been placed (p < 0.05). Histologic assessment showed full-thickness conversion in architecture of the zygomatic arch from compact to woven bone beneath onlays of either autogenous bone graft or steel implant; histometric assessment demonstrated an accompanying decrease in bone density in the latter groups relative to the control zygoma (p < 0.05). We conclude that onlay autogenous bone graft and alloplastic implants to the facial skeleton induce transformation of both graft and recipient bone from compact to woven architecture, accompanied by a reduction in bone density. The biomechanical strength of recipient facial bone is significantly weakened if an onlay bone graft or implant is removed. Weakening occurs per unit area of remaining bone, and is therefore independent of any thinning that may occur within the recipient bone because of graft/implant placement. These findings may impact upon decisions to augment stress-bearing regions of the facial skeleton with bone graft or implants, particularly if the graft/implant may eventually require removal.     

In vivo evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein (rhOP-1) implants as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusions

STUDY DESIGN: Posterior spinal fusion segments were evaluated in adult mongrel dogs at 6, 12, and 26 weeks post-implantation. Four sites on each animal received implants consisting of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 on a bone collagen carrier, bone collagen carrier alone, autogenous iliac crest bone, or no implant material. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 as a bone graft substitute in achieving posterior spinal fusion and compare the results to those obtained using autogenous bone graft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior spinal fusion generally includes onlay grafting of autogenous or allogeneic bone after decortication of bony surfaces of the vertebral elements. The search for an acceptable bone graft substitute material has in recent years centered upon proteins capable of inducing bone in vivo. Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 has demonstrated efficacy in healing large segmental osteoperiosteal defects in rabbits, dogs, and monkeys and appears ideally suited as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusions. METHODS: The quality of fusion and new bone formation was evaluated using plain films, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Radiographic and histologic studies demonstrated that recombinant human osteogenic protein-1-treated fusion segments attained a stable fusion by 6 weeks post-implantation and were completely fused by 12 weeks. The autograft sites demonstrated fusion at 26 weeks post-implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 is an effective bone graft substitute for achieving stable posterior spinal fusions in a significantly more rapid fashion than can be achieved with autogenous bone graft.     

Bicyclic derivatives of hexahydroaporphine: novel agents that lower intraocular pressure

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants in conjunction with maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) the 3 maxillary molars on 1 side of the jaws were extracted and the remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the floor of the sinus was reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed in each monkey and the sinuses were grafted with a porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Interpore-200). At the same time, 2 hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants (IMZ) were immediately placed into the augmented sinuses (i.e. simultaneous-implants-loaded group). Four months later, 2 additional similar implants were placed into the previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed-implants-loaded group). After 4 months, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice of the animals). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that removal of the maxillary molars was performed 7 months after those in the opposite side, and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous-implants-unloaded group and delayed-implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded and unloaded implants were stable the day of sacrifice. Histologically, the grafted sinuses exhibited a significant amount of new bone formation with integration of the porous hydroxyapatite graft particles and hydroxyapatite-coat of the dental implants to the new bone. Histometric analysis indicated that on the loaded side the implants placed simultaneously with the sinus lift procedure exhibited greater direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact than the delayed placed implants. In addition, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was significantly greater in the residual bone in comparison to the augmented area in all groups. Loading of the implants exhibited a positive effect on the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact in the augmented area. It could be concluded that hydroxyapatite-coated implants may be of benefit when used in conjunction with sinus augmentation procedures.     

Primary inherited defects in neutrophil function: etiology and treatment

A variety of materials have been employed in rhinoplasty for augmentation and reconstruction. While autogenous tissue remains the mainstay of nasal implants and are the clear choice for structural and augmentation grafting of the nasal tip, limited availability and unpredictable resorption or remodeling have made homologous and synthetic implants important considerations for dorsal augmentation grafting. This section discusses categories of graft materials, their physical properties, harvesting and preparation technique, and advantages and disadvantages. An algorithm for nasal implants for specific indications in support and augmentation is presented.     

Biphasic calcium phosphate concept applied to artificial bone, implant coating and injectable bone substitute

The development of calcium phosphate ceramics and other related biomaterials for bone graft involved a better control of the process of biomaterials resorption and bone substitution. The bioactive concept was developed for biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics (BCP). An optimum balance of the more stable phase of HA and more soluble TCP was obtained for controlling gradual dissolution in the body, seeding new bone formation as it releases calcium and phosphate ions into the biological medium. The bone/material interface and the events occurring in the development of this dynamic interface such as cellular response, biodegradation or bioresorption of the materials and their transformation to carbonate hydroxyapatite (CHA) were described. These processes were observed in both bulk samples, implant coating and injectable bone substitute (IBS).     

Reharvest of iliac crest donor site cancellous bone

Patients requiring cancellous bone grafting of an extensive deficit or multiple bone grafting procedures often lack a sufficient quantity of autogenous cancellous bone. Canine studies have indicated that a potential exists for reharvesting autogenous cancellous bone from an iliac crest donor site using a trapdoor harvesting technique. However, significant human experience with this procedure has been lacking. This report describes four patients who underwent successful reharvesting of an iliac crest donor site that provided clinically sufficient autogenous cancellous bone graft material to treat an ongoing or a new skeletal problem. These patients all met specific criteria regarding use of the trapdoor method of bone graft harvest and a minimum 24-month interval between bone grafting procedures. Preoperative computed tomography scanning of the iliac crest was useful in documenting that sufficient cancellous bone was available for reharvest. It appears that iliac crest donor site reharvesting is a specific advantage of the trapdoor technique and is a possible alternative to multiple site grafting or the use of allograft or bone substitute materials.     

Alveolar bone grafting in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients

Autogenous bone graft of an alveolar cleft area has the following advantages: (1) assistance in the closure of buccoalveolar oronasal fistula; (2) provision of bony support for unerupted teeth and teeth adjacent to the cleft; (3) formation of a continuous alveolar ridge to facilitate orthodontic correction of malocclusion; (4) supporting the nostril floor and alar base to improve nasal aesthetics. It has been well accepted in most craniofacial centers as routine procedure in cleft lip and palate rehabilitation. A new surgical technique for alveolar bone grafting has been introduced to the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center since July 1991. It provided a good exposure of the alveolar cleft, primary closure of the fistula and adequate volume of bone graft. A review of 27 consecutive alveolar bone grafting procedures performed in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from July 1991 to June 1992 was presented. Patients have been followed up for at least 6 months. The alveolar bone graft was evaluated clinically and radiologically at one week, six months and one year after the surgery. The preliminary results indicated that the new surgical technique produced less chance of recurrent fistula, good postoperative gingival height, and improvement of nasal aesthetics. Based on the results of this new study we strongly advocate the use of this new surgical technique.     

Clinical evaluations of a porous-surfaced endosseous implant system

Clinical evaluations of a new porous-surfaced implant concept (Endopore) in a large population of fully and partially edentulous patients are reported, and a technique of spreading buccal and lingual plates with osteotomes to place these implants in proximity to the sinus of the posterior maxilla is described. Three-dimensional, interconnecting pores on this implant's bone interface surface give a great surface area for bone engagement. When the maxilla is prepared by this spreading procedure, these implants can be successfully placed in areas having limited available bone. Our success rates are 97.0% for implants stabilizing a mandibular overdenture and 94.8% for implants placed in partially edentulous patients. Many times, sinus lift or other augmentation procedures can be avoided in the maxilla and mandible, allowing for less patient morbidity and for an implant reconstruction that is more affordable for the patient.     

Reconstruction of residual alveolar cleft defects with one-stage mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants

PURPOSE: This study evaluates a treatment regimen for reconstruction of residual maxillary alveolar cleft defects consisting of mandibular bone grafting and immediate implant installation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen cleft patients (five female and 11 male) had residual cleft defects of the alveolar ridge reconstructed with bone grafts from the mandibular symphyseal region. The bone graft was pretapped at the donor site before fixation in the residual ridge with Br?nemark implants. Twenty implants were installed according to this concept. The period of observation ranged from 36 to 69 months, with a mean of 48 months after implant installation. RESULTS: Five patients developed wound dehiscenses that resulted in total or partial bone graft sequestration. Two implants were lost, one due to sequestration and the other due to mobility at the abutment procedure; 18 implants were still well functioning at the end of the observation period. However, all patients showed significant periimplant bone resorption after this one-stage treatment. CONCLUSION: Because of the observed complication rate, the one-stage procedure may not be optimal for reconstructing residual cleft defects.     

Implant reconstruction of the jaws and craniofacial skeleton

Full oral rehabilitation with a high degree of success is now possible with osseointegrated implants. Osseointegration is a direct connection between living bone and the titanium implant at the level of the light microscope. Osseointegrated implants are currently used to replace single teeth, support fixed bridges and stabilize full dentures. These implants can also be placed extraorally for attachment of facial prosthesis. The surgical technique used to place implants intraorally into jaws or facial skeleton is performed in two stages using a local anesthetic and/or conscious sedation. During stage I surgery, holes are placed into the jaw using a series of gradually larger diameter burs until the desired diameter and depth of the bony preparation is achieved. The implant is then placed. The implant must remain undisturbed for 4 months for osseointegration to take place. Stage II surgery is then required to remove the mucosa over the implant and place the transmucosal abutment. After 1-2 weeks of healing, the restorative dentist can take an impression and fabricate the prosthesis. On occasion, it is necessary to augment the height and width of the atrophic jaw with autogenous or allogeneic bone grafts prior to implant placement. Bone grafts are sometimes placed on the floor of the nose or the floor of the maxillary sinus. Guided tissue regeneration is a technique used to generate bone within bony defects adjacent to implants. With long-term rates of success (5 years) of 99% for implants placed in the mandible and 95% for those placed in the maxilla, reconstruction of the jaws and cranial facial skeleton with osseointegrated implants has become the treatment of choice.     

Histologic changes in the sinus membrane after maxillary sinus augmentation in goats

PURPOSE: Previous studies have reported on the morphologic aspects of bone regeneration after maxillary sinus grafting. However, no previous studies have examinated the morphology of the maxillary sinus mucosa after grafting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histologic changes in the lining membrane after sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A unilateral osteotomy of the lateral maxillary wall, medial displacement of the bony segments, and elevation of the sinus mucosa were performed in 12 goats. An autogenous bone graft combined with coralline particles was placed on the floor of the sinus in three animals, and coralline particles alone were placed in three other goats. Six goats were not grafted and were used as controls. Samples were harvested at 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 months. The maxillary sinus mucosa was examined using light microscopy and scanning and transmission electronic microscopy. RESULTS: The coralline particles were surrounded by fibrous connective tissue when used alone. The addition of iliac crest bone to the coralline particles stimulated bone formation. After the sinus augmentation, the mucosal lining showed a lack of glands in the lamina propria, and the epithelium showed an increase in goblet cells. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the sinus mucosa undergoes physiologic adaptations and remains healthy and free of chronic sinusitis after maxillary sinus grafting.     

Root form implants for tomorrow

However, accepting the route of dental implantology's evolution, and with a positive outlook for the future, the author believes that the four types of root form implants described here will be utilized. This belief in their application, has come from vast experience placing thousands of implants into various types of bone. It is now up to those dentists who have become exclusively involved with one type of root form implant to reflect on the ideas expressed in this article, and start to challenge what has been considered the "norm", and consider treating their patients with implants that will most likely prove to be superior in design and function.     

Case report. Dental Class I and skeletal Class III with unilateral right crossbite

Different forms of bone grafting materials are alluded to in this paper. Autogenous graft is superior to other bone grafting materials but is many times not available or the patient is not willing to utilize cranial or iliac crest bone. Allografts, Xenografts and bone substitute materials are the most widely used today in dentistry and especially those patients wishing to use dental implants as abutment support. The technique discussed utilizing surgical tissue design, tissue closure over the graft material and the tissue barrier can be used to produce a successful final result using a graft material of choice. It is quite certain that in the near future, the use of bone graft enhancement materials (bone morphogenic protein-like substances) will be used to enhance a quicker result. It is anticipated that growth factors, stimulating factors, bone morphogenetic proteins, and osteogenetic proteins will cause a bone graft to vascularize, solidify, incorporate, and function optimally in a shorter period of time. These materials will reduce the disability time and enhance the outcome of bone grafting in the dental profession. It is also anticipated that advanced tissue surgical techniques will give better vascularization to the new graft. The described technique is predictable and should give the operator the desired result.     

Reconstruction of alveolar defects before implant placement

Guided bone regeneration and bone grafting have been used to reconstruct defective alveolar ridges in preparation for implant placement. This phase of implant treatment is critical to a successful overall result. Remarkable advances that have occurred in techniques and materials enable us to place and restore implants in cases where previously it was not feasible. Three case reports are presented to illustrate successful management of different alveolar defects.     

The use of osteotomes for sinus augmentation at the time of implant placement

The placement of endosseous dental implants is often hampered by the loss of alveolar bone. In the posterior maxilla, the presence of the maxillary sinus and less-dense bone present additional obstacles to successful implant placement. Existing methods of subantral augmentation require extensive surgical manipulation, often including a second surgical site for harvesting autogenous bone. The development of surgical osteotomes has facilitated the placement of implants in areas of minimal alveolar bone height in the posterior maxilla. This article describes the osteotome technique for sinus augmentation at the time of implant placement and presents a short-term evaluation of 34 implants placed in 18 patients.