Renal function in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers

BACKGROUND: Data have not shown consistent effects with calcium channel blockers on the course of renal function in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who have hypertension alone or in association with renal damage. The differences between the antiproteinuric effects of subclasses or formulations of calcium channel blockers and the heterogeneity of renal lesions may contribute to the discrepancy in these data. Clinical studies conducted by the authors and other recent data that describe the course of renal dysfunction in hypertensive NIDDM patients treated with antihypertensive agents are reviewed. Renal structural changes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Most available data indicate that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and dihydropyridine and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers produce similar effects on glomerular filtration rate. In one study of patients achieving intensified, strict control of blood pressure (target<140/85 mmHg) with either cilazapril or amlodipine, glomerular filtration rate declined by 2.03+/-0.66 ml/ min/1.73 m2 per year and 2.01+/-0.71 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, respectively, in the subgroup with normoalbuminuria and by 2.15+/-0.69 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year and 2.33+/-0.83 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 per year, respectively, in the subgroup with microalbuminuria. Renal lesions in NIDDM patients were found to be structurally heterogeneous and glomerular filtration rate appeared to decline only in patients with renal structural changes typical of NIDDM. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of blood pressure control, rather than the method by which this is accomplished, is the most important factor in determining the evolution of incipient nephropathy in hypertensive NIDDM. The kidneys of microalbuminuric NIDDM patients are structurally heterogeneous with less than one-third of patients having 'typical' diabetic nephropathology.     

Amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

Optimal treatment of hypertension requires the use of effective antihypertensive drugs. Calcium channel blockers are widely used in the treatment of hypertension and appear to be particularly efficacious in ethnic Chinese patients. The aim of this open-label study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerability of three dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in sequence, using the same protocol for each. After 2 weeks of placebo treatment, 73 males and 45 females (mean age, 45 +/- 10 years; mean weight, 67 +/- 10 kg) with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 115 mm Hg) were treated with amlodipine (n = 41), felodipine (n = 38), or isradipine (n = 39) for 8 weeks, with dose titration after 4 weeks. Mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 23/17, 30/17, and 20/15 mm Hg after 8 weeks of treatment with amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively. These reductions were all statistically significant. Blood pressure was controlled (defined as diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg at the final visit or a decrease from baseline of > or = 10 mm Hg) in 85%, 74%, and 74% of patients receiving amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively. There were no significant changes in heart rate, plasma lipid levels, or serum biochemistry markers with any of the three treatments. No serious adverse events occurred, but mild adverse effects, including headaches, flushing, tachycardia, dizziness, and edema, were reported; 1 (2%), 6 (16%), and 5 (13%) patients receiving amlodipine, felodipine, and isradipine, respectively, withdrew from the study (P < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that all three drugs are highly effective in lowering blood pressure and are well tolerated in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Antiproteinuric effect predicts renal protection by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in rats with established adriamycin nephrosis

1. The mechanism of renal protection by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is still the subject of debate. Inhibition of proteinuria might play a role. If so, a good antiproteinuric response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition should predict subsequent protection against renal structural damage. This hypothesis has not been tested in models where treatment is started after the renal disease is well established, i.e. models that mimic the clinical situation. 2. We therefore investigated this hypothesis in 96 male Wistar rats with established adriamycin nephrosis. Reduction of proteinuria was achieved by lisinopril (0, 2, 5 and 10 mg day-1 kg-1) on two different sodium diets (0.3% and 0.05% NaCl). Therapy started 6 weeks after adriamycin (at stable proteinuria) and was continued for 6 weeks. 3. Lisinopril reduced blood pressure by 32 +/- 4% and proteinuria by an average of 72 +/- 7%, with stabilization after 2 weeks. Considerable interindividual differences in antiproteinuric response was found. Glomerulosclerosis score was reduced by 15 +/- 5%. All the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were enhanced by sodium depletion, but sodium depletion in itself did not affect blood pressure (124 +/- 4 mmHg), proteinuria (664 +/- 68 mg/day) or glomerulosclerosis score (30 +/- 5%). Interestingly, the more proteinuria was reduced initially in an individual rat, the less sclerosis was found in the long term in that rat. 4. In conclusion, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition lowers proteinuria and prevents glomerulosclerosis in established adriamycin nephrosis. These effects are enhanced by sodium depletion. The individual short-term antiproteinuric effect predicts the protection against ultimate glomerular damage. This is consistent with the hypothesis that reduction of proteinuria is a mechanism by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors exert renoprotection.     

Long-term effects of antihypertensive agents on proteinuria and renal function

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have examined the effects of antihypertensive agents on proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate in patients with kidney disease, many questions remain unresolved. These questions include whether the effects of agents differ, whether their effects are similar in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with renal disease, and whether the effects of any agents are independent of blood pressure reductions. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies obtained with MEDLINE and bibliographies from comprehensive reviews but included only investigations with follow-up times of at least 6 months. We combined data (1) in an analysis of randomized controlled trials, (2) in a separate univariate analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials, and (3) using weighted multiple linear regression. RESULTS: In 14 randomized controlled trials, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors caused a greater decrease in proteinuria (pooled mean [95% confidence intervals], -0.51[-0.68 to -0.35], ln [treatment/control]), improvement in glomerular filtration rate (0.13 mL/min per month [0.10 to 0.16 mL/min per month]), and decline in mean arterial pressure (-4.0 mm Hg [-4.9 to -3.0 mm Hg]) compared with controls. In a multivariate analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials, each 10-mm Hg reduction in blood pressure decreased proteinuria (regression coefficient [95% confidence interval] -0.14 [-0.22 to -0.06] ln [after/before]), but angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (-0.45 [-0.58 to -0.32]) and nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists (-0.38 [-0.70 to -0.06]) were associated with additional declines in proteinuria that were independent of blood pressure changes and diabetes. Each 10-mm Hg reduction in blood pressure caused a relative improvement in glomerular filtration rate (0.18 mL/min per month [0.04 to 0.31 mL/min per month]), but among diabetic patients there was a tendency for dihydropyridine calcium antagonists to cause a relative reduction in glomerular filtration rate (-0.68 mL/min per month [-1.31 to -0.04 mL/min per month]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term beneficial effects of antihypertensive agents on proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate are proportional to blood pressure reductions and are similar in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with renal disease. In addition, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and possibly nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists, have additional beneficial effects on proteinuria that are independent of blood pressure reductions.     

Renal effects of losartan and amlodipine in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine on proteinuria, renal haemodynamics, glomerular sieving and tubular function in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: The study design was a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled, randomized crossover trial with amlodipine and losartan. Renal parameters were measured at baseline and at the end of each 4-week active treatment period. Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of non-diabetic renal disease and hypertension were included. RESULTS: Mean arterial blood pressure decreased from 123+/-13 mmHg at baseline to 113+/-10 mmHg (P<0.01) on losartan and to 114+/-10 mmHg on amlodipine (P<0.01). Urinary albumin excretion significantly decreased from 3510+/-2586 mg/24 h at baseline to 2684+/-2051 mg/24 h (P<0.01) on losartan and increased non-significantly to 3748+/-3355 mg/24 h on amlodipine. Filtration fraction significantly decreased from a baseline value of 22.8+/-9.3% to 21.2+/-10.2% (P<0.05) on losartan and increased to 23.6+/-8.9% (ns) on amlodipine. Either drug did not significantly alter glomerular sieving of neutral dextrans. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that losartan, but not amlodipine, decreased albumin excretion in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic nephropathy.     

Parallel comparative trial of amlodipine and nitrendipine monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES: To compare the blood pressure effects of two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, amlodipine and nitrendipine, in 488 patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: The study used a randomized, single-blind design of 4 weeks' duration conducted at four medical centres in China. Patients were randomized to receive either amlodipine monotherapy (5-10 mg once daily; n = 334) or nitrendipine (10 mg twice or three times daily; n = 1 54). Blood pressure was evaluated by standard blood pressure measurements before and after treatment, and by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a subgroup of patients (n = 18). RESULTS: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced from baseline after 4 weeks of amlodipine and nitrendipine monotherapy. Diastolic blood pressure was reduced by 14.4% in the amlodipine group, which was significantly better than the 13.0% reduction in the nitrendipine group (P< 0.05). In addition, blood pressure response rates were significantly better with amlodipine monotherapy than with nitrendipine monotherapy. In the subgroup of patients undergoing 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were reduced from baseline in the amlodipine and nitrendipine groups. Adverse effects were generally mild, with dizziness, flushing, palpitation, headache, drowsiness and ankle oedema being the most common. Rushing and headache were more frequent in the nitrendipine group than in the amlodipine group (P< 0.05 for flushing and P<0.01 for headache). CONCLUSIONS: Amlodipine monotherapy reduced blood pressure more effectively than nitrendipine monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension and was associated with fewer adverse events.     

T4 DNA ligase reduces chromosome damage and enhances cell survival in CHO cells treated with bleomycin

OBJECTIVE: Recent clinical studies suggest that the reflex increase in sympathetic nervous activity accompanying a reduction in blood pressure may contribute to the untoward effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. The aim of this study was to examine whether plasma noradrenaline levels and renin activity are increased with the reduction of blood pressure during the initial phase of administration of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine. METHODS: The effects of amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure and on diurnal variations in plasma noradrenaline and renin activity were examined 1, 4, and 7 days after the start of amlodipine administration in eight inpatients with essential hypertension. RESULTS: The 24-h mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure on day 7 was significantly lower than it was 1 day before the start of treatment. There was no change in the mean heart rate. The mean trough to peak ratios of systolic and diastolic blood pressure of seven patients were 61% and 71%, respectively. Diurnal patterns of plasma noradrenaline levels and renin activity 1, 4, and 7 days after the start of amlodipine administration were unchanged. CONCLUSION: The antihypertensive effects of amlodipine were of slow onset and long duration and were not accompanied by an increase in sympathetic activity or activation of the renin-angiotensin system.     

Comparison of amlodipine and quinapril on ambulatory blood pressure and platelet function in hypertension

The effect of calcium channel blocker (CCB), amlodipine (5-10 mg/day) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, quinapril (10-40 mg/day) on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), rheological and platelet function in hypertension were compared in this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study. This study was preceded by 4 weeks placebo run-in period and the total duration of the study was 28 weeks. Casual and 24 h ABP, plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone (PA) concentration as well as metabolic and platelet function were determined before and at the end of each drug therapy. A total of 27 patients completed this study. Casual BP was significantly reduced after amlodipine or quinapril treatment, but there was no change in heart rate. Regarding the 24 h ABP, amlodipine produced a fall from 145 +/- 8/94 +/- 7 to 130 +/- 13/85 +/- 10 mm Hg (P < 0.001 for both SBP and DBP). Quinapril also caused a reduction from 144 +/- 10/94 +/- 7 to 134 +/- 12/88 +/- 8 mm Hg (P < 0.001 for both SBP and DBP). Neither amlodipine nor quinapril produce any significant change in heart rate. The level of 6-keto-prostaglandin Fl alpha (6-Keto-PGFl alpha) was increased from 36.8 +/- 4.4 to 45.1 +/- 2.5 pg/ml (P < 0.05) and no significant change of thromboxane B2(TXB2) was noted after amlodipine treatment. PRA was increased from 1.24 +/- 0.31 to 1.62 +/- 0.41 ng/ml/h (P < 0.05) after quinapril treatment. Other biochemical parameters were unchanged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Urinary protein excretion rate is the best independent predictor of ESRF in non-diabetic proteinuric chronic nephropathies. "Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia" (GISEN)

We investigated the predictors of the rate of glomerular filtration rate decline (delta GFR) and progression to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the 352 patients with proteinuric non-diabetic chronic nephropathies [urinary protein excretion rate (UProt) > or = 1 g/24 hr, creatinine clearance 20 to 70 ml/min/1.73 m2] enrolled in the Ramipril Efficacy In Nephropathy (REIN) study. Overall the GFR declined linearly by 0.46 +/- 0.05 ml/min/1.73 m2/month (mean rate +/- SEM) over a median follow-up of 23 months (range 3 to 64 months), and progression to ESRF was 17.3%. Using multivariate analysis, higher UProt and mean arterial pressure (MAP) independently correlated with a faster delta GFR (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively) and progression to ESRF (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Mean UProt and systolic blood pressure during follow-up were the only time-dependent covariates that significantly correlated with delta GFR (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively) and ESRF (P = 0.006 and P = 0.0001, respectively). After stratification for baseline UProt, patients in the lowest tertile (UProt < 1.9 g/24 hr) had the slowest delta GFR (0.16 +/- 0.07 ml/min/1.73 m2/month) and progression to ESRF (4.3%) as compared with patients in the middle tertile (UProt 2.0 to 3.8 g/24hr; delta GFR, 0.55 +/- 0.09 ml/min/1.73 m2/month, P = 0.0002; ESRF, 15.3%, P = 0.0001) and in the highest tertile (UProt 3.9 to 18.8 g/24 hr; delta GFR, 0.70 +/- 0.11 ml/min/1.73 m2/month, P = 0.0001; ESRF, 32.5%, P = 0.0001). Both delta GFR (P = 0.01) and progression to ESRF (P = 0.01) significantly differed even between the middle and the highest tertiles. On the contrary, stratification in tertiles of baseline MAP failed to segregate subgroups of patients into different risk levels. Patients with the highest proteinuria and blood pressure were those with the fastest progression (delta GFR, 0.91 +/- 0.23; ESRF 34.7%). Of interest, at each level of baseline MAP, a higher proteinuria was associated with a faster delta GFR and progression to ESRF. On the other hand, at each level of proteinuria, a faster delta GFR was associated with MAP only in the highest tertile (> 112 mm Hg) and the risk of ESRF was independent of the MAP. Thus, in chronic nephropathies proteinuria is the best independent predictor of both disease progression and ESRF. Arterial hypertension may contribute to the acceleration of renal injury associated with enhanced traffic of plasma proteins. Antihypertensive drugs that most effectively limit protein traffic at comparable levels of blood pressure are those that most effectively slow disease progression and delay or prevent ESRF in proteinuric chronic nephropathies.     

Vectorcardiographic evaluation of myocardial infarct size: departure parameters are superior to conventional spatial parameters

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of losartan and amlodipine on peripheral capillary microcirculation in hypertension. SETTING: Medical out-patient clinic, Basel, in a university teaching hospital. METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period 20 patients aged 50 +/- 8 (range 36-65) years with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomly allocated to receive active treatment with losartan 50 mg titrated to losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 12.5 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg titrated to 10 mg for a 12 week period. Titration was performed if diastolic blood pressure (BP) was > or=90 mm Hg after 6 weeks of treatment. BP measurements as well as video capillary microscopy of the finger nailfold at the end of the placebo period and after 12 weeks of active treatment were compared. Capillary blood cell velocity was measured at rest and immediately, 1 min and 2 min after local finger cooling. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment with amlodipine (n = 10) and losartan titrated to losartan-HCT (n = 10) sitting BP decreased significantly from 160 +/- 7/103 +/- 4 mm Hg and 147 +/- 7/98 +/- 6 mm Hg to 131 +/- 10/86 +/- 7 mm Hg and 134 +/- 17/89 +/- 9 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.01). After local finger cooling the area under the curve (AUC) of capillary blood cell velocities was 1.13 +/- 0.58 mm (median +/- s.d.) at baseline and increased to 1.94 +/- 1.15 (P < 0.05) in losartan/losartan-HCT treated patients. In amlodipine treated patients the increase in AUC of capillary blood cell velocity did not reach the level of statistical significance (1.59 +/- 1.36 to 2.14 +/- 1.05 mm). CONCLUSION: This small trial shows that the area under the curve of capillary blood cell velocity increases in hypertensive patients treated with both losartan/losartan-HCT and amlodipine compared with baseline values.     

Antihypertensive effects of combined lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with systodiastolic or systolic hypertension: results of a multicenter trial

This study was aimed at evaluating the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide administered in the fixed combination of 20 and 12.5 mg, respectively, on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in elderly patients (age, 68.8 +/- 5.8 years, mean +/- SD) with mild-to-moderate essential systodiastolic or isolated systolic hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, patients received once daily lisinopril combined with hydrochlorothiazide for a 6-week period. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, clinic blood pressure was assessed 24 h after dosing, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored, taking blood pressure readings every 15 min. Pretreatment clinic blood pressure was 171.3 +/- 14.0/103.7 +/- 5.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) in the group with systodiastolic hypertension (n = 405) and 179.6 +/- 9.4/83.6 +/- 5.4 mm Hg in the group with isolated systolic hypertension (n = 165). The corresponding 24-h average blood pressures were 144.1 +/- 13.9/88.7 +/- 8.4 mm Hg (n = 114) and 150.7 +/- 15.5/80.8 +/- 9.4 mm Hg (n = 40). Clinic blood pressure was significantly reduced by treatment in both groups. This was the case also for ambulatory blood pressure, which was reduced by 9.6 +/- 0.9%/9.9 +/- 0.9% in systodiastolic and by 11.8 +/- 1.3%/8.5 +/- 1.5% in isolated patients with systolic hypertension (p < 0.05 at least for all differences). The antihypertensive effect was similar in patients older and younger than 70 years. In all groups, it was manifest both during the day and the nighttime and was still significant after 24 h. Thus single daily administration of combined lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide effectively reduces blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension.     

Converting-enzyme inhibitor versus calcium antagonist in cyclosporine-treated renal transplants

The influence of antihypertensive treatment on the long-term evolution of arterial pressure and renal function was studied in a prospective controlled trial conducted in renal transplant recipients treated by cyclosporine. Within six months after transplantation, patients were randomly allocated to treatment by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril (ACEI, alone or associated with frusemide; N = 14), or the calcium antagonist, nifedipine (CA, alone or associated with atenolol; N = 11). Glomerular filtration rate (TcDTPA clearance) and effective renal plasma flow (hippuran clearance) as well as 24-hour urinary excretion of electrolytes and albumin were estimated at about 1 and 2.5 years of follow-up. Before initiation of antihypertensive therapy, the two groups were similar with regards to mean arterial pressure (119 +/- 2 vs. 120 +/- 4 mm Hg), effective renal plasma flow (285 +/- 26 vs. 248 +/- 33 ml/min/1.73 m2) and glomerular filtration rate (59 +/- 4 vs. 61 +/- 8 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the ACEI and CA groups, respectively). Both ACEI and CA treatments were associated with no change in renal function, a similar change in mean arterial pressure (ACEI -18 +/- 3; CA -13 +/- 5 mm Hg) and identical trough blood levels of cyclosporine. Urinary albumin excretion did not change significantly in any groups. Of interest, only in the ACEI group did filtration fraction significantly decrease (from 0.22 +/- 0.01% to 0.19 +/- 0.01% at final studies). These results indicate that in cyclosporine-treated transplant recipients, a satisfactory control of hypertension is obtained by chronic ACEI, which is as effective on arterial pressure as a combination of CA and atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Low dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and glomerular permselectivity in renal transplant recipients

In this study, we determined the fractional clearance of neutral polydisperse dextrans (theta D) and monodisperse dextran sulfate (theta DS) to describe glomerular size and charge selectivity in 25 renal transplant recipients with proteinuria. Thirteen were treated with low dose lisinopril for six months (group 1) and 12 patients without ACE inhibitor therapy formed group 2. Mean arterial blood pressure was stable (group 1, 112 +/- 4; group 2, 109 +/- 2 mm Hg at baseline and after 6 months) whereas creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow decreased nonsignificantly but were comparable at any time. Lisinopril treatment lowered filtration fraction (22 +/- 2 vs. 19 +/- 2%, P = 0.07) whereas no change was seen in group 2 (20 +/- 2%). The fractional protein excretion (mg urinary protein per day/ml creatinine clearance per day) was stable in group 1, but significantly increased in group 2. The same pattern was found for theta D larger than 56 A. theta DS was stable and consistently elevated in both groups at any time. We conclude that low dose ACE inhibitor treatment in proteinuric renal transplant recipients stabilizes glomerular size selectivity independently of its systemic hemodynamic effects.     

Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine compared with nifedipine retard in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amlodipine for hypertension treatment in comparison with nifedipine retard. METHODS: We examined 31 patients with arterial blood pressure approximately 155-165 mmHg/100-105 mm Hg at the beginning of the trial. It was a randomized double-blind, parallel-group trial including two groups of patients. Patients of the first group were given active amlodipine and nifedipine retard placebo during 6 weeks, while the second group was given active nifedipine retard and amlodipine placebo. Statistical analysis was made using the paired Student's t-test, chi-square test and ANOVA test. RESULTS: At end point we observed significant decrease in arterial blood pressure after treatment of both drugs. The treatment with nifedipine retard increased the mean heart rate of patients. Amlodipine therapy in comparison to nifedipine retard did not change the heart rate in treated patients. Safety parameters: SGOT, SGTP, creatinine and others were in laboratory norms ranges. CONCLUSION: Amlodipine proved to be an effective, more safe and better-tolerated therapeutical alternative for hypertension management than nifedipine retard.     

Pardaxin, a new pharmacological tool to stimulate the arachidonic acid cascade in PC12 cells

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are known to have differential effects on both changes in proteinuria as well as progression of diabetic nephropathy. No clinical study, however, has evaluated whether the differential antiproteinuric effects of CCBs may be explained by their effect on glomerular membrane permeability. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that certain subclasses of CCBs reduce proteinuria by changing size selectivity of the glomerular membrane, hence changing its permeability. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with type 2 diabetes and the presence of nephropathy with hypertension were randomized to receive either diltiazem CD or nifedipine GITS after baseline data for mean systolic and diastolic pressure, urinary protein excretion, glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, neutral dextran and IgG clearances were obtained. Glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, neutral dextran and IgG clearance were measured every three months, arterial pressure and heart rate every month. Patients were followed for 21 months. RESULTS: At 21 months, both patient groups had similar levels of blood pressure control, however, only the diltiazem group had a change in proteinuria (4+/-10%delta, nifedipine vs. -57+/-18%delta, diltiazem; P < 0.001) with improvement in glomerular size selectivity and change in IgG clearance. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that CCBs that provide sustained reductions in proteinuria do so, in part, by improving glomerular size permselectivity.     

Achievement and safety of a low blood pressure goal in chronic renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study showed a beneficial effect of a lower-than-usual blood pressure (BP) goal on the progression of renal disease in patients with proteinuria. The purpose of the present analyses was to examine the achieved BP, baseline characteristics that helped or hindered achievement of the BP goals, and safety of the BP interventions. Five hundred eighty-five patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate between 13 and 55 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (0.22 to 0.92 mL/s per 1.73 m2) were randomly assigned to either a usual or low BP goal (mean arterial pressure < or = 107 or < or = 92 mm Hg, respectively). Few patients had a history of cardiovascular disease. All antihypertensive agents were permitted, but angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (with or without diuretics) followed by calcium channel blockers were preferred. The mean (+/- SD) of the mean arterial pressures during follow-up in the low and usual BP groups was 93.0 +/- 7.3 and 97.7 +/- 7.7 mm Hg, respectively. Follow-up BP was significantly higher in subgroups of patients with preexisting hypertension, baseline mean arterial pressure > 92 mm Hg, a diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease or glomerular diseases, baseline urinary protein excretion > 1 g/d, age > or = 61 years, and black race. The frequency of medication changes and incidence of symptoms of low BP were greater in the low BP group, but there were no significant differences between BP groups in stop points, hospitalizations, or death. When data from both groups were combined, each 1-mm Hg increase in follow-up systolic BP was associated with a 1.35-times greater risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. Lower BP than usually recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease is achievable by several medication regimens without serious adverse effects in patients with chronic renal disease without cardiovascular disease. For patients with urinary protein excretion > 1 g/d, target BP should be a mean arterial pressure of < or = 92 mm Hg, equivalent to 125/75 mm Hg.     

Effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, on proteinuria in chronic glomerular disease

The antiproteinuric effect of the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, was studied in 14 patients (10 men and 4 women, age range of 24 to 60 years) with chronic glomerulonephritis in whom IgA nephritis had been confirmed by renal biopsy. Eight of the 14 patients had received antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers, diuretics or beta-blockers. Captopril was added to these regimens at 25 mg twice daily in 3 patients, and 37.5 mg in 11 patients. Proteinuria decreased from 2.55 +/- 0.48 g/day to 1.58 +/- 0.35 g/day within three months after the start of administration. In 4 patients (28.6%), the extent of reduction was over 50%, and in 8 patients (57.1%), over 25%. Blood pressure, creatinine clearance and serum creatinine were not changed significantly. There was a positive linear correlation between the extent of reduction of proteinuria and the increase in plasma renin activity (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). We conclude that captopril reduces proteinuria in some patients with IgA nephritis whose plasma renin activity responds to the drug.     

Blood pressure independent effects of nitrendipine on cardiac structure in patients after renal transplantation

Left ventricular hypertrophy is well established as a blood pressure independent cardiovascular risk factor in patients on renal replacement therapy. The effects of antihypertensive treatment on myocardial structure and function in renal transplant recipients have been so far only rarely investigated. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study patients were randomized to the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine or placebo if the transplanted kidney had developed a stable phase. Normotensive patients received nitrendipine 2 x 5 mg daily or placebo, hypertensive patients received 2 x 10 mg up to 2 x 20 mg nitrendipine daily or placebo. To achieve adequate blood pressure control, all patients with still elevated blood pressure on study medication received antihypertensive drugs other than calcium channels blockers. Ambulatory blood pressure recording and 2D-guided M-mode echocardiography were performed at baseline and upon completion of the study. In addition, laboratory workup (including serum creatinine and lipids) was done, and serum aldosterone, plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin II and blood glucose levels were measured in all patients at baseline and after at least 12 months of therapy. Ambulatory blood pressure was almost identical between both groups at study baseline and follow-up. In renal transplant patients on nitrendipine, posterior wall thickness (-0.10 +/- 1.77 mm) and septal wall thickness (-0.83 +/- 2.23 mm) did not change significantly from baseline. In contrast, posterior wall thickness (0.71 +/- 0.92 mm, P < 0.01) and septal wall thickness (0.97 +/- 2.20 mm, P < 0.05) increased in patients on placebo, which differed from the observed changes on nitrendipine (ANOVA: P = 0.093 and P = 0.048, respectively). Relative wall thickness, a parameter for concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, became numerically smaller on nitrendipine therapy from 0.46 +/- 0.07 to 0.44 +/- 0.09 (-0.02 +/- 0.09, NS) but increased from 0.42 +/- 0.08 to 0.48 +/- 0.08 in the placebo arm (+0.04 +/- 0.08, P < 0.02), which was also significant between the two groups (ANOVA: P = 0.036). Endocrine parameters, lipids and blood glucose were not different between the two groups. We conclude from these data that the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine exerted beneficial effects on cardiac structure in patients after renal transplantation independent of blood pressure.     

Ultrastructural immunolocalization of bone sialoprotein in guinea-pig osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of mibefradil and amlodipine in patients with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised, parallel group multicentre trial. METHODS: 239 patients received 50 mg mibefradil or 5 mg amlodipine for 4 weeks, followed by a forced titration to 100 mg mibefradil or 10 mg amlodipine for an additional 8 weeks. Patients then entered a 4-week withdrawal period either on therapy or switched to placebo. RESULTS: Statistically equivalent reductions in trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed after 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with 50/100 mg mibefradil (-11.5 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) and 5/10 mg amlodipine (-13.2 +/- 7.9 mm Hg). The number of patients with normalised SDBP (< or = 90 mm Hg) increased 23.3% in the mibefradil group and 19.5% in the amlodipine group (approximately 74% in both groups). Patients on mibefradil or amlodipine during the withdrawal period had significantly larger decreases in SDBP than those on placebo. Patients on mibefradil had a decrease in heart rate of 5.5 bpm. Patients on amlodipine had no change in heart rate; however, cessation of amlodipine was associated with a decrease in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Mibefradil was as effective as amlodipine in reducing BP; both compounds were effective treatments of hypertension.     

Effect of indomethacin on blood pressure control during treatment with nitrendipine

This study tested the hypothesis that treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug will not alter the hypotensive effect of a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist. Fifteen essential hypertensives (ages 58-80 years) had a supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 100 mmHg after 4 weeks monotherapy with nitrendipine 5-20 mg twice daily. They entered a double-blind randomised crossover study in which the addition of indomethacin 25 mg three times daily was compared with placebo in treatment phases each of 4 weeks duration. Subjects were seen weekly and measurements in the last 2 weeks of each phase were compared. Supine blood pressure (mean +/- SE) was higher in the indomethacin phase (158 +/- 4/80 +/- 2) than in the placebo phase (154 +/- 4/76 +/- 3) (p < 0.01 for DBP). In 6/15 (40%) of subjects the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure with indomethacin was > 5 mmHg. Plasma urea was also increased in the indomethacin phase: 7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l compared with placebo: 6.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (p < 0.001). The study has demonstrated that concurrent treatment with the NSAID indomethacin impairs the blood pressure lowering effect of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist nitrendipine. This increase in blood pressure with indomethacin in subjects treated with nitrendipine may represent either an independent pressor effect of indomethacin or a reduced vasodilator prostanoid contribution to the hypotensive effect of nitrendipine. This blood pressure increase may be sufficient to interfere significantly with clinical blood pressure control in some subjects.