A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplant recipients: an interim report

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are newly approved immunosuppressive agents. However, the safety and efficacy of the combination of MMF and Tac in primary liver transplantation has not been determined. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, open-label prospective randomized protocol was initiated to study the efficacy and toxicity of Tac and steroids (double-drug therapy) versus Tac, steroids, and MMF (triple-drug therapy) in primary adult liver transplant recipients. Both groups of patients began on the same doses of Tac and steroids. Patients randomized to triple-drug therapy also received 1 g of MMF twice a day. RESULTS: Between August 1995 and January 1997, 200 patients were enrolled, 99 in double-drug therapy and 101 in triple-drug therapy. All patients were followed until May 1997, with a mean follow-up of 12.7 months. During the study period, 28 of 99 patients in double-drug therapy received MMF to control ongoing acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and/or neurotoxicity. On the other hand, 61 patients in triple-drug therapy discontinued MMF for infection, myelosuppression, and/or gastrointestinal disturbances. By an "intention-to-treat analysis," the actuarial 1-year patient survival rate was 85.1% in double-drug therapy and 83.1% in triple-drug therapy (P=0.77). The actuarial 1-year graft survival rate was 80.2% for double-drug therapy and 79.2% for triple-drug therapy (P=0.77). Forty-one patients (41.4%) in double-drug therapy and 32 (31.7%) in triple-drug therapy had at least one episode of rejection, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.15). The mean maintenance dose of corticosteroids was slightly lower in triple-drug compared with double-drug therapy. CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survival rates were similar in both groups. There was a trend to a lower incidence of rejection, reduced nephrotoxicity, and a lesser amount of maintenance corticosteroids in triple-drug therapy compared with double-drug therapy.     

Immunoprophylaxis with a monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibody in liver transplant patients

The immunosuppressive effect of a monoclonal antibody (moAb), BT563, directed to the alpha-chain of the IL-2R (CD25), was analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial and a prospective randomized trial. Primary objectives were evaluation of the incidence of acute rejections and infections; secondary objectives were safety and tolerability of the moAb. A total of 28 patients were enrolled (phase II) to receive 10 mg/day of BT563 (12 days) as immunoprophylaxis in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and low-dose steroids. Subsequently 32 patients were randomly assigned (phase III) to receive BT563 (10 mg/day) for 12 days or ATG (5 mg/kg/day) for 7 days in addition to cyclosporine and low-dose steroids. No side effects of the BT563 treatment were noted. The actuarial survival was 82% at 12 months in the phase II trial and 92% at 12 months in both arms of the phase III trial. There was one acute rejection in the phase II trial. No acute rejections were noted in the BT arm of the phase III trial and 5 acute rejections were treated in the ATG arm. In the phase II trial 7 infectious episodes were observed, while one infection was seen in the BT arm and 7 in the ATG arm of the triple immunosuppression phase III trial. In all patients circulation of coated CD25+ lymphocytes was observed during BT563 treatment; there was no evidence of depletion or modulation of CD25+ cells. Mean serum levels of BT563 ranged from 1.6 to 7.6 microgram/ml throughout the therapy. An antimurine response was seen in 82% (phase II) and 100% (phase III) of the patients. Antirabbit antibodies were found in 56% of the patients treated with ATG. Analysis of the antimurine response specificity revealed in 56% blocking anti-isotypic antibodies and only in 3% of the patients an anti-idiotypic response. The data of the study presented suggest that therapy with an anti IL-2R moAb is at least equal to ATG application according to the incidence of acute rejections and infections.     

Steroid-free immunosuppression after kidney transplantation with antithymocyte globulin induction and cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND: Our goal in clinical renal transplantation is to find immunosuppressive procedures that not only promote long-term patient and graft survival but also improve the overall well-being of the patients. METHODS: In a retrospective consecutive clinical study with historical controls, 68 patients were discharged from our center with functioning grafts between September 1995 and December 1997. Patients received steroid-free immunosuppression using an initial 10-day antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance therapy with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). No steroids were given. RESULTS: After an observation for up to 2.5 years (median 488 days, range 127 to 945 days), 66 patients (one died from sepsis after 6 months, and one died of peritonitis after returning to dialysis) were alive and well. Sixty-four grafts were functioning well, hemolytic uremic syndrome recurred in one graft, one graft had to be removed for noncompliance, and two patients returned to dialysis after chronic rejection-one after 8 months (the patient who died in peritoneal dialysis) and one (a third graft in an antibody-positive patient) 16 months after transplantation. We observed only 10 acute rejections (15%), a rate significantly lower (P=0.0006) than the 71 acute rejections observed in 190 previous consecutive transplants (37.4%) treated without MMF but otherwise after exactly the same protocol. In further comparison, the MMF-treated group also showed an equivalent (P=NS) rate of cytomegalovirus infections and a lower rate (P<0.00005) of Epstein-Barr virus infections. Graft function was excellent (median serum creatinine below 200 micromol/L at 1 year), and no malignancies were observed in the MMF-treated patients. Side effects were mainly leukopenia and two gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Our first-line, steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol allows initial graft function, provides a safe level of long-term graft survival and function with a very low rejection rate, gives an acceptable rate of side effects, and possesses the potential for lowering the incidence of chronic rejection over the long-term. Compared with protocols that discontinue steroids after the initial posttransplant period, a steroid-free protocol avoids the increased risk of infection and body disfigurement in the early posttransplant period. It also avoids the long-term risks of steroid use and the increased risks of rejection when the steroids are withdrawn.     

Steroid withdrawal from long-term immunosuppression in liver allograft recipients

Corticosteroids were withdrawn from the immunosuppressive regimen of 168/197 (85%) of liver transplant patients who survived for more than three months. In 14, steroids were restarted for reasons other than rejection. The remaining 154 patients were evaluated for the occurrence of rejection and graft loss. Risk factors for the development of rejection after steroid withdrawal were assessed. There were 13 episodes of rejection in 12 (7.8%) grafts; 7 (4.5%) experienced acute cellular rejection, and 6 (3.9%) developed chronic ductopenic rejection. All cases of acute rejection resolved with high-dose steroids. Graft and patient loss due to chronic rejection was 3 (1.9%) and 2 (1.3%), respectively. Chronic rejection resolved in 1 patient, 1 was successfully retransplanted, and in the other 2 the principal cause of death was recurrent tumor. None of the risk factors examined (primary indication for transplant, severity of previous acute rejection, use of OKT3, retransplantation, ABO blood group donor/recipient match, CMV infection, and CsA mono versus CsA and AZA double therapy) were associated with the development of chronic rejection poststeroid withdrawal. The prevalence of side effects, after steroid withdrawal, was low; 66% of patients never required antihypertensive medication; 14% experienced a significant septic episode, and only 4 died with sepsis as the major factor. There were no fungal sepsis and no new cases of diabetes. Withdrawal of corticosteroids after 3 months can be successfully achieved in the majority of liver allograft recipients and is associated with a low rate of rejection, graft loss, and complications attributable to immunosuppressive medication.     

Renal function improves in liver transplant recipients when switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus

Sirolimus (Rapamune; Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA) is a newer immunosuppressive drug with no known acute or chronic nephrotoxic effects; however, limited data are available in liver transplant recipients. We prospectively evaluated changes in renal function in liver transplant recipients after conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus monotherapy. We measured serial serum creatinine levels in liver transplant recipients with chronic nephrotoxicity caused by calcineurin inhibitors before and after conversion to sirolimus therapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Change in eGFR over time, incidence of acute hepatocellular rejection, and adverse events while being administered sirolimus monotherapy were recorded. Mean interval between liver transplantation and initiation of sirolimus therapy was 310 weeks (range, 9 to 780 weeks). Of 21 patients included in our study, 18 patients were converted to sirolimus monotherapy and 3 patients were switched to sirolimus and low-dose steroid therapy. Patients were followed up for a mean of 66.8 +/- 38.9 (SD) weeks after conversion. Renal function improved in 71% of patients (15 of 21 patients). Median eGFR improved significantly from 34 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of conversion to 43 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the last follow-up (27% increase in eGFR; P = 001). Median monthly change in eGFR was from -0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2 pre-sirolimus therapy to +1.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 post-sirolimus therapy (P =.09). Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limited. Only 1 patient developed biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection, which was treated with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Two patients discontinued sirolimus therapy because of toxicity (oral ulceration, 1 patient; interstitial pneumonitis, 1 patient). Renal function improved significantly in the majority of liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency caused by calcineurin inhibitors when converted to sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus monotherapy provided adequate immunosuppression with a low incidence of acute cellular rejection and minimal adverse events.     

Histopathologic findings from 2-year protocol biopsies from a U.S. multicenter kidney transplant trial comparing tarolimus versus cyclosporine: a report of the FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the histopathologic results of 2-year protocol biopsies from patients who were enrolled in the U.S. FK506 kidney transplant study . METHODS: Recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants were randomized to tacrolimus or cyclosporine therapy. Patients active in the trial at 2 years after transplantation were approached for a protocol biopsy. Biopsies were scored by the Banff classification in a blinded fashion by one pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (41.3% of those active at 2 years) had a 2-year protocol biopsy performed; 79 patients were treated with tacrolimus and 65 patients were treated with cyclosporine. Evidence of acute rejection was found in seven (8.9%) of the 2-year biopsies in tacrolimus-treated patients and six (9.2%) cyclosporine-treated patients. Chronic allograft nephropathy was found in 49 (62.0%) tacrolimus biopsies and 47 (72.3%) cyclosporine biopsies (P=0.155). There were no apparent histopathologic differences between the tacrolimus and cyclosporine biopsies. The occurrence of chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly higher in patients who received a graft from an older donor (P<0.01), who experienced presumed cyclosporine or tacrolimus nephrotoxicity (P<0.001), who developed a cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.038), or who experienced acute rejection in the first year after transplantation (P=0.045). A multivariate analysis showed that nephrotoxicity and acute rejection were the most significant predictors for chronic allograft nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of histologic acute rejection was rare at 2 years, confirming the absence of subclinical acute rejection in these late biopsies. A majority of the biopsies showed features consistent with chronic allograft nephropathy that was associated with acute rejection (particularly in cyclosporine-treated patients), nephrotoxicity, and cytomegalovirus infection in the first year. This suggests that nonimmunologic factors, such as drug-induced toxicity, may play an important role in chronic allograft nephropathy.     

Mycophenolic acid: a welcome adjunct immunosuppressant after organ transplants

Three major double-blind trials in kidney transplantation patients have shown that mycophenolic acid (mycophenolate mofetil), added to an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporine and prednisone, reduces the incidence of acute rejection after kidney transplantation by 50%, during the first six months. This statistically significant reduction is achieved equally with daily doses of 2 or of 3 g. In view of the fact that the side effects (diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, leukopenia) are more frequently found in the patients treated with 3 g, it is advised to prescribe 2 g mycophenolic acid. As acute rejection is a risk factor for the development of chronic rejection and because a beneficial effect of mycophenolic acid on chronic rejection in animal models has been observed, there may also be an effect on late graft loss due to chronic rejection after kidney transplantation in man.     

Long-term outcome of a prospective randomized trial of conversion from cyclosporine to azathioprine treatment one year after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of cyclosporine (CsA), 1-year renal allograft survival has improved, but concern persists about the long-term adverse effects of CsA, especially with respect to renal function and blood pressure. This randomized controlled trial was set up to establish whether withdrawal of CsA would alter long-term outcome. METHODS: Adult patients who, at 1 year after renal transplantation, had a stable serum creatinine of less than 300 micromol/L and who had not had acute rejection within the last 6 months were eligible for entry. Patients were randomized either to continue on CsA (n=114) or to stop CsA and start azathioprine (Aza, n=102). All patients remained on prednisolone. Median follow-up was 93 months after transplantation (range: 52-133 months). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in actuarial 10-year patient or graft survival (Kaplan-Meier), despite an increased incidence of acute rejection within the first few months after conversion. Median serum creatinine was lower in the Aza group (Aza: 119 micromol/L; CsA. 153 micromol/L at 5 years after randomization, P=0.0002). The requirement for antihypertensive treatment was also reduced after conversion to Aza; 75% of patients required antihypertensive treatment at the start of the study, decreasing to 55% from 1 year after randomization in the Aza group and increasing to >80% in the CsA group (55% (Aza) and 84% (CsA) at 5 years after randomization, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from CsA to Aza at 1 year after renal transplantation results in improvement in both blood pressure control and renal allograft function, and is not associated with significant adverse effects on long-term patient or graft survival.     

The dipsogen angiotensin II does not stimulate ethanol intake in mice

The Banff classification of acute rejection is based on histologic grades and scores for borderline changes, glomerular, vascular, interstitial and tubular lesions. We reviewed 56 episodes of acute rejection occurring in 44 kidney allograft recipients (30 cadaveric and 14 living donor transplants), comparing Banff classification to degree of reversibility of rejection. Rejection reversal was defined as complete if serum creatinine returned < or = 25% of baseline, partial if creatinine was > 25% to < 75% of baseline, and irreversible if creatinine was > or = 75% of baseline or graft loss occurred. Eight biopsies were classified as borderline (SUM score 1.6 +/- 0.5), 14 grade I (SUM score 3.3 +/- 0.4), 19 grade II (SUM score 4.2 +/- 0.3), and 15 grade III (SUM score 8.5 +/- 0.4). SUM distinguished borderline and grade III rejections, but not grades I and II. Clinically, grade and SUM score correlated with rejection reversal. Complete reversal of rejection occurred in 93% of patients with grade I rejection, while 47% of patients with grade III had irreversible rejection. The mean SUM for complete reversal was 3.9 +/- 0.34 and was different from SUM of partial (6.0 +/- 0.86) and irreversible (8.5 +/- 0.93), P < 0.006. Meanwhile, vascular scores were similar for rejections with complete (0.9 +/- 0.2) or partial (1.0 +/- 0.4) reversal, but significantly higher in those with irreversible rejection (3.0 +/- 0.4, P < 0.000). Likewise, mean scores for tubulitis and interstitial inflammation were significantly higher for irreversible rejection. Resolution of rejection by steroids was correlated to low vascular score (steroid sensitive 0.65 +/- 0.25 vs. steroid resistant 1.42 +/- 0.18, P < 0.01), and low SUM score (steroid sensitive 3.7 +/- 0.5 vs. steroid resistant 5.22 +/- 0.43, P < 0.04). Neither scores for tubulitis nor interstitial cellular inflammation were predictive of steroid sensitivity. These data demonstrate that Banff scoring has clinical relevance in predicting rejection reversal and has implications to first-line therapy of rejection episodes.     

The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) implications for the pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Tacrolimus has already gained a high reputation as an induction-maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Recently, it is being used as rescue therapy against rejection, and its effectiveness also appears to have been established to some extent. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of Tacrolimus rescue therapy at 4 institutions in the Kinki District. The subjects were 19 patients treated with Tacrolimus against rejection observed during immunosuppressive therapy using cyclosporin. Evaluation was made by classifying the patients into 6 with acute rejection that occurred within 3 months after transplantation (AR), 4 with late onset acute rejection that developed more than 3 months after operation (LAR), and 9 patients with chronic rejection (CR). In the AR group, many patients received combination therapy at the introduction of Tacrolimus, and the long-term outcome was satisfactory. Tacrolimus was effective in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients in the LAR group. The trough levels of Tacrolimus at its introduction were 10-15 ng/ml in the AR and LAR groups. Deterioration of the transplanted kidney function was prevented in 3 (50%) out of 6 patients in the CR group observed for less than 1 year, but it deteriorated in all 3 patients observed for 1 year or longer. The trough levels of tacrolimus at its introduction were 5-10 ng/ml in many patients in the CR group. The rescue therapy using Tacrolimus was effective against acute rejection but further follow-up is considered to be needed to evaluate its efficacy against chronic rejection.     

Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Although noncompliance with immunosuppressive medication is recognized as a critical behavioral risk factor for late acute rejection episodes and graft loss after transplantation, little is known about the degree of subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance, its associated risk for acute late rejection episodes (>1 year after transplantation), and its determinants in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: The convenience sample of this longitudinal study included 101 European heart transplant recipients (87 men and 14 women), with a median age of 56 (Q1 = 50, Q3 = 61) and a median posttransplantation status of 3 (range 1 to 6) years. Subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance was measured during a 3-month period with electronic event monitoring. Selected sociodemographic, behavioral, cognitive, emotional, health, and treatment-related determinants of medication noncompliance were measured by using instruments with established psychometric properties or by patient interviews. With the use of iterative partitioning methods of cluster analysis, including nonstandardized electronic event monitoring compliance parameters, patients were categorized by degree of subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance into a 3-cluster solution. RESULTS: Overall compliance was high, with a median medication taking compliance of 99.4%. The 3 derived clusters, that is, excellent compliers (84%), minor subclinical noncompliers (7%), and moderate subclinical noncompliers (9%), differed significantly by degree of subclinical noncompliance (p < .0001) and showed a 1.19%, 14.28%, and 22.22% incidence of late acute rejections (p = .01), respectively. The 3 groups also differed in terms of former medication noncompliance (p = .02), appointment noncompliance (p = .03), and perceived self-efficacy with medication taking (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although in absolute numbers cyclosporine compliance in this sample was high, minor deviations from dosing schedule were associated with an increased risk for acute late rejection episodes. This suggests a pivotal role of patient compliance in successful long-term outcome after transplantation.     

A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506), a macrolide molecule that potently inhibits the expression of interleukin 2 by T lymphocytes, represents a potential major advance in the management of rejection following solid-organ transplantation. This randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in patients receiving cadaveric kidney transplants. METHODS: A total of 412 patients were randomized to tacrolimus (n=205) or cyclosporine (n=207) after cadaveric renal transplantation and were followed for 1 year for patient and graft survival and the incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates were 95.6% for tacrolimus and 96.6% for cyclosporine (P=0.576). Corresponding 1-year graft survival rates were 91.2% and 87.9% (P=0.289). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the tacrolimus group (30.7%) compared with the cyclosporine group (46.4%, P=0.001), which was confirmed by blinded review, and in the use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection (10.7% and 25.1%, respectively; P<0.001). Impaired renal function, gastrointestinal disorders, and neurological complications were commonly reported in both treatment groups, but tremor and paresthesia were more frequent in the tacrolimus group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 19.9% in the tacrolimus group and 4.0% in the cyclosporine group (P<0.001), and was reversible in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine in preventing acute rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients, and significantly reduces the use of antilymphocyte antibody preparations. Tacrolimus was associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events, which were rarely treatment limiting, and with posttransplant diabetes mellitus, which was reversible in some patients.     

Liver transplantation: experiences and results of a program at the University of Liege

The orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) program of the University of Liège was initiated in 1986. Between 1986 and December 1998, 150 adult OLT have been performed in our institution, including 18 liver retransplantations, 1 combined heart and liver transplantation and 3 combined liver and kidney transplantations. The aim of this study was to report the last 3 years of our experience. From January 1996 to November 1998, we performed 50 OLT on 49 patients. Three were retransplantations and two were combined liver and kidney transplantations. Fourty-three patients were transplanted for chronic liver disease and 6 for acute or subacute hepatopathy. Mean waiting time on the list was 4 weeks. Immunosuppression was based on triple therapy (cyclosporin A/tacrolimus, steroids, azathioprine), with steroid and azathioprine withdrawal in most of the patients after 3 months. In the chronic liver disease group, operative (< 30 days) survival was 95% (peroperative myocardial infarction in 2 patients). In the acute liver disease group, postoperative survival was 66%. No perioperative death occurred in 1997 and 1998. Actuarial one year survival was 87%. In our experience, OLT has become a safe procedure.     

Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: Historically, the acute rejection rates in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients have been extremely high (50-80%), with many second and third rejection episodes despite the use of quadruple immunosuppression (antibody induction and cyclosporine [CsA]-azathioprine [AZA]-based maintenance immunosuppression). Although this acute rejection has rarely led to graft loss, it has been a great cause of morbidity and of significantly increased cost. In an attempt to decrease the acute rejection rate and related morbidity in SPK transplant recipients, we compared two "state-of-the-art" immunosuppression regimens in a prospective, randomized, single-center study. METHODS: Patients who received SPK transplants were randomized to receive either tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=18) or CsA (Neoral formulation) and MMF (n=18). All patients received OKT3 induction and prednisone, which was tapered to 5 mg/day by 6 months after transplantation. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven. In addition, metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, serum cholesterol), drug toxicity, and infection also were measured. Data were compared with that of a historical group (n=18) who received conventional CsA (Sandimmune formulation) and AZA-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11% in both the TAC-MMF and CsA-MMF groups with only two patients in each group experiencing a rejection episode. This rejection rate was significantly decreased from that of the CsA-AZA historical group (77%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in infection rates, including cytomegalovirus, or in metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, and cholesterol levels). All patients remained on their initial immunosuppression regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Between 3 and 6 months after transplantation, three patients were switched from TAC to CsA for recurrent migraine headaches, posttransplant diabetes, and chronic cytomegalovirus infection. Two patients in the CsA-MMF group died of nonimmunologic causes (aspiration pneumonia and arrhythmia) between 3 and 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study show that MMF treatment significantly decreases the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in SPK transplant recipients compared with AZA-treated historical controls. In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control.     

Use of rat microglial cells for the study of a possible mechanism of brain damage in AIDS

The long-term graft function after withdrawal of steroids from maintenance immunosuppression was analyzed in 98 kidney recipients (59 on cyclosporin monotherapy, 39 on cyclosporin plus azathioprine) who had not developed an early rejection episode when prednisolone was discontinued. Seven years after steroid withdrawal the probability of an increase in serum creatinine (> 20% of baseline levels) was 51%. The increase in creatinine was associated with sclerosing arteriopathy as a marker of chronic rejection in 29 of 43 graft biopsies. The addition of azathioprine had no effect on the stability of long-term graft function and did not influence the 7-year graft survival rate in this highly selected group of patients.     

HLA-identity--long-term renal graft survival, acute vascular, chronic vascular, and acute interstitial rejection

The object is analysis of the impact of acute and chronic rejection on long-term function in HLA-identical renal transplants performed from 1967 to 1995 by the Saskatchewan Renal Transplant Unit. Forty-eight grafts in 46 patients were studied, of which 39 were first and nine second grafts. Forty-two were for primary and six for secondary renal disease. Thirty-five received azathioprine/prednisone prophylaxis, and 13 received cyclosporine/prednisone with/without azathioprine. Ten-year all graft actuarial survival was 84%, 10-year actuarial graft survival in patients with primary renal disease 90%, and with subsequent graft after first HLA graft failed 97.5%, for age-matched population 98.5% (P=NS). Overall death rate was 8.7% (4/46); in secondary renal disease patients 50% (3/6); in primary renal disease patients 2.5% (1/40, P=0.004). All (9/9) HLA-identical second grafts functioned. Acute rejection with azathioprine/prednisone prophylaxis occurred in 55% (9/17) of grafts treated with <6 pre-graft blood transfusions, with the same prophylaxis but >5 units in 12% (2/16, P=0.015), and with cyclosporine prophylaxis in 13% (2/15, P=0.021). Pulse steroids alone reversed all acute rejection. Grafts failed in 6.2% (3/48), all in primary renal disease patients and one from technical one noncompliance, and one chronic rejection. Graft cost/patient/year amortized over 9 years is $3,855 and comparable dialysis cost would be $35,650; cost for all patients on dialysis for 9 years would be $11,293,320 while comparable graft cost was 1,221,418, a savings of 89.2%. Our conclusions are that HLA-identity associates with the following: (1) a 10-year actuarial survival in primary renal disease that equals that of the age-matched population, (2) uniform success in repeat grafts, (3) virtual absence of chronic rejection despite a high incidence of acute rejection in azathioprine/prednisone grafts that (4) always reversed on pulse steroids, and (5) a cost reduction for grafting of 93.2% compared with dialysis therapy.     

Nomenclature and classification of the rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND: A pilot study was performed to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of "low-dose" OKT3 induction after liver transplantation. METHODS: Sixteen patients received a 5- to 10-day course of OKT3 (2.5 mg i.v. daily) along with azathioprine, prednisone, and the delayed introduction of cyclosporine (Neoral). RESULTS: Patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 88% and 82%. Five patients (31%) had biopsy-proven rejection; all five were treated successfully with steroids. There were 15 infections in 12 patients, including 5 cytomegalovirus infections. Adverse events attributed to OKT3 consisted of low-grade fever (five patients), transient hypoxemia (three patients), and transient hypotension (two patients). Pharmacy acquisition costs for OKT3 averaged $2,139 less as compared to a group of historical controls receiving full-dose therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose OKT3 induction appears to be a safe and useful method of postoperative immunosuppression after liver transplantation. Its ultimate clinical, immunologic, and economic efficacy awaits determination by randomized trial.     

High rate of acute rejections in renal allograft recipients with thrombophilic risk factors

Inherited and acquired thrombophilic disorders predispose patients for thromboembolic and probably other occlusive vascular events that occur when additional risk factors play in concert. Because acute rejections in renal transplant recipients may reflect vascular events, and an impairment of the fibrinolytic system in immunosuppressed patients has been previously described, the implications of genetic or acquired risk factors of thrombophilia for the occurrence of early acute rejections after kidney transplantation were evaluated. The following risk factors of thrombophilia were determined in 97 patients after cadaveric kidney transplantation: factor V Leiden mutation, protein S, protein C, and antithrombin deficiency. In a retrospective analysis, the prevalence of acute rejections, the histologic classification when rejection episodes had been confirmed by biopsy, and other vascular complications were evaluated. In 21 of the 97 patients, an inherited or acquired risk factor of thrombophilia was detected. Prevalence of acute rejections was 71% in the first 6 mo after transplantation in patients with a thrombophilic disorder and significantly higher compared with patients without thrombophilia (41%; P = 0.017). The distribution of classic risk factors associated with acute rejections, such as number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches or percentage of panel-reactive antibodies, was similar in patients with and without thrombophilia. In the eight patients with thrombophilia and histologically proven acute rejection, four patients had an acute vascular rejection, and in two patients a vascular involvement was suspected. Furthermore, prevalence of cerebral or coronary vascular disease, or venous thromboembolic complications, was significantly higher in patients with a thrombophilic clotting defect (67%) compared with patients with normal hemostasis parameters (28%; P < 0.002). It is concluded that renal allograft recipients with thrombophilia are at risk of developing an acute rejection or other vascular event. Although the determination of thrombotic risk factors was performed at least 3 mo after an acute rejection episode, it can be presumed that acute rejection episodes are associated with subsequent coagulatory abnormalities with further consequences for transplant survival. Thus, pretransplant evaluation of genetic and acquired risk factors of thrombophilia is recommended.     

Study of the beta -delayed neutron decay of 18N

The shortage of suitable liver donors for children has motivated the use of ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) grafts for transplantation in urgent situations. However, survival after ABO-I liver grafts has been reported at about 30% as compared with 80% in cases of ABO-identical or -compatible liver grafts. This difference has been attributed to antibody-mediated, hyperacute or chronic liver rejection, due to preformed ABO antibodies (alloantibodies). In this study, we report our results with ABO-I livers in children without alloantibodies at the time of transplantation. From January 1988 to June 1993, 143 OLT were performed in 122 children. Eight children received 8 ABO-I liver grafts. Of these, 7 patients were included in the study. All 7 were alloantibody free before OLT. Five children were spontaneously alloantibody free, while in 2 children, the plasma alloantibodies were eliminated before and after transplantation using intravenous infusion of specific blood group antigens of the donor blood group (soluble antigens). Immunosuppression consisted of a triple-drug treatment combining CsA, AZA, and steroids. The follow-up period was between 10 and 48 months. One child died from a surgical complication. Six children survived, but 1 died 10 months later from intestinal obstruction. There were no graft losses and no episodes of hyperacute or chronic rejection. The graft and patient survival rate was 71%. There was a 28% incidence of rejection, but all were mild (requiring steroid boluses only). Our results suggest that the absence of ABO alloantibodies at the time of and after transplantation can protect ABO-I liver grafts against antibody-mediated rejection, whether hyperacute or chronic, and that soluble antigens are effective in eliminating alloantibodies in children.     

Determinants of late allograft nephrectomy

When loss of graft function occurs more than six months after transplantation, allograft nephrectomy is not routinely performed at the time of graft failure. It is usually performed only on those patients who subsequently develop specific complications. However, little is known about the characteristics that make patients more likely to require allograft nephrectomy. The purpose of our study was to identify risk factors for the subsequent need for allograft nephrectomy in patients with graft failure occurring more than 6 months after transplantation. Forty-one patients were studied. Inclusion criteria were: loss of graft function > or = 6 months after transplantation, resumption of dialysis and initiation of weaning from immunosuppression. Thirty patients were treated with cyclosporine + prednisone +/- azathioprine and 11 with azathioprine + prednisone. Mean follow-up time was 17.8 months, ranging from 6 months to 6.1 years. Recipient age, sex and race, original renal disease, donor, donor source (cadaveric vs living related), HLA compatibility, levels of panel reactive antibodies, occurrence of initial delayed graft function, causes of graft failure and tapering of immunosuppression were similar in patients with and without allograft nephrectomy. Using univariate analysis, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent in patients with a history of 2 or more episodes of acute rejection than in patients with no rejection episode: 83% vs 30% (p = 0.03). In addition, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent if the immunosuppressive regimen included cyclosporine (62% vs 27.3%; p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis however, the number of previous episodes of rejection was found to be the only significant predictor for allograft nephrectomy. None of the other variables considered in the multivariate analysis, including the type of immunosuppressive therapy, was identified as a significant predictor for the need to perform allograft nephrectomy. In summary, the need for late allograft nephrectomy was correlated with the number of previous episodes of acute rejection. Patients with a history of numerous rejection episodes should thus be considered more likely to require allograft nephrectomy once immunosuppression is withdrawn. Possible interventions to reduce or prevent the need for nephrectomy include more gradual tapering of immunosuppression at the time of graft failure or indefinite low-dose immunosuppressive therapy.