Acid suppression with ranitidine plus oral triple therapy improves ulcer healing but not Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate whether the addition of 2 weeks of ranitidine to a 1-week oral triple therapy (OTT) regimen improved ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and eleven consecutive patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of active duodenal ulcer (DU) and a positive antrum biopsy for H. pylori were enrolled. Those attending the Hospital Vera Cruz (Group A, n=142) received a 14-day course of ranitidine (150 mg after breakfast and dinner) plus a 1-week OTT, consisting of bismuth subcitrate, (240 mg after the 3 meals), tetracycline (500 mg, 10 min before the three meals and at bedtime), and furazolidone (200 mg after breakfast and dinner). Patients from the Hospital das Clinicas (Group B, n=69) received the same OTT as Group A but without ranitidine. Patients underwent endoscopy again on average 40 days (range: 30-60 days) after completing therapy in order to assess ulcer healing and H. pylori status. RESULTS: Both schedules were equally efficient in eradicating H. pylori with 90% (128/142) eradication in group A, and 84% (58/69) in group B (p=0.2). In contrast, the addition of ranitidine to OTT improved ulcer healing when compared with OTT alone (96%, 137/142, vs. 70%, 48/69; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the association of acid suppression, obtained with 2 week ranitidine administration with OTT improved ulcer healing but did not enhance H. pylori eradication.     

One-week antibiotics versus maintenance acid suppression therapy for Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer bleeding

Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Our aim was to compare the effect of anti-Helicobacter therapy with maintenance treatment of H2-receptor antagonist in the prevention of relapses of ulcer and bleeding. Patients with bleeding duodenal or gastric ulcers and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either a one-week course of triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline plus ranitidine or a six-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day. After the ulcers healed, the antibiotic-treated patients were not given any medication, whereas the ranitidine-treated patients continued to receive a maintenance dose of 150 mg/day. One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized to receive anti-Helicobacter therapy and 124 patients to receive long-term ranitidine. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 98.2% in those who received triple therapy and 6.1% in those who received ranitidine (P < 0.0001). At the six-week follow-up, ulcer healing was documented in 88.2% in those who received triple therapy and 86.1% in those who received ranitidine (P = 0.639). Recurrent ulcer developed in nine of the ranitidine-treated patients and three of them presented with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient in the antibiotic group developed recurrent ulcer without rebleeding (P = 0.01). It is concluded that eradication of H. pylori is sufficient for the prevention of recurrent bleeding ulcers.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori reduces the rate of rebleeding in peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether therapy designed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection resulted in a reduction in rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Patients presenting because of major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from peptic ulcer and whose ulcers healed in a study in which they were randomized to receive ranitidine alone or triple therapy plus ranitidine were followed up regularly with endoscopy. No maintenance anti-ulcer therapy was given after ulcer healing. METHODS: Patients received ranitidine, 300 mg, or ranitidine plus triple therapy. Triple therapy consisted of tetracycline, 2 g; metronidazole, 750 mg; and bismuth subsalicylate, 5 or 8 tablets (151 mg bismuth per tablet), and was administered for the first 2 weeks of treatment; ranitidine therapy was continued until the ulcer had healed or 16 weeks had elapsed. After ulcer healing, no maintenance antiulcer therapy was given. Development of ulcer recurrence with or without recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with major upper gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic ulcer were studied; 17 received triple therapy and 14 ranitidine alone. Major rebleeding occurred significantly (p = 0.031) more often in those in the ranitidine group (28.6%), compared with none (0%) in the triple therapy group. CONCLUSION: Eradication of H. pylori infection reduces the rate of ulcer recurrence and rebleeding in complicated ulcer disease.     

Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition

In almost all eradication regimens, which contain antibiotics and bismuth derivatives, the administration of acid suppressing drugs for 4-6 weeks is recommended for healing of duodenal ulcer. The aim of this multicenter double blind study is to elucidate the effect of two classic antibiotics tetracycline (CAS 60-54-8) and metronidazole (CAS 443-48-1) alone or combined with ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) on the healing of duodenal ulcer and eradication of Helicobacter Pylori. Patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized to two treatment groups: group A received either ranitidine 4 x 150 mg or tetracycline 4 x 500 mg or metronidazole 3 x 250 mg for 2 weeks. Group B received 4 x placebo + tetracycline and metronidazole as in group A for 2 weeks. A final endoscopy was performed after 8 weeks. Four biopsy specimens were obtained from the antrum (two) and corpus (two) for both urease test and hematoxylin stain for detection of H. pylori. Out of 201 patients entering the study 156 completed the study (78 in A and 78 in B). The healing rate of duodenal ulcer was 98.7% in group A and 97.5 in group B. The eradication rate was only 33.3% in group B but 64% in group A (p < 0.001), when additionally ranitidine was given. The present study shows that treatment with the two antibiotics tetracycline and metronidazole alone results in a very low H. pylori eradication, but almost complete healing of duodenal ulcer after 8 weeks. Prolonged administration of antisecretory drugs in eradication regimens containing two antibiotics is not necessary for duodenal ulcer healing. However, the addition of H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors to antibiotics increases the eradication rate.     

One-week use of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been widely used in combination with amoxycillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To study the effects of 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. METHOD: Patients with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were prospectively randomized to receive either RBC with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (RAC), or omeprazole with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (OAC). No additional ulcer healing drug was used after the 1-week medication. Patients were assessed for H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and side-effects after receiving the therapies. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were recruited to this study, with 50 patients randomized to each treatment group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, duodenal ulcers were completely healed in 45 (90%) patients in the RAC group and 43 (89.6%) in the OAC group (P = 1.0). H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 47 (94%) in the RAC group and 42 (87.5%) in the OAC group (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the severity of side-effects experienced by the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: One-week RBC-based triple therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. The therapeutic effects are comparable to a 1-week course of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.     

Randomised trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in patients with peptic ulcers caused by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). But the pathogenic role of H pylori in this disease is controversial. We studied the efficacy of eradication of H pylori in the prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers. METHODS: We recruited patients with musculoskeletal pain who required NSAID treatment. None of the patients had previous exposure to NSAID therapy. Patients who had H pylori infection but no pre-existing ulcers on endoscopy were randomly allocated naproxen alone (750 mg daily) for 8 weeks or a 1-week course of triple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, each given orally four times daily) before administration of naproxen (750 mg daily). Endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks of naproxen treatment or when naproxen treatment was stopped early because of bleeding or intractable dyspepsia. All endoscopic examinations were done by one endoscopist who was unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of gastric and duodenal ulcers. FINDINGS: 202 patients underwent endoscopic screening for enrolment in the trial, and 100 eligible patients were randomly assigned treatment. 92 patients completed the trial (47 in the naproxen group, 45 in the triple-therapy group). At 8 weeks, H pylori had been eradicated from no patients in the naproxen group and 40 (89%) in the triple-therapy group (p < 0.001). 12 (26%) naproxen-group patients developed ulcers: five had ulcer pain and one developed ulcer bleeding. Only three (7%) patients on triple therapy had ulcers, and two of these patients had failure of H pylori eradication (p = 0.01). Thus, 12 (26%) patients with persistent H pylori infection but only one (3%) with successful H pylori eradication developed ulcers with naproxen (p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION: Eradication of H pylori before NSAID therapy reduces the occurrence of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.     

New one-week, low-dose triple therapy for the treatment of duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial therapy is the recommended treatment for duodenal ulcer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The eradication of bismuth-based triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and amoxicillin is limited by low compliance, drug resistance and side-effects. Two-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has a higher eradication rate but is costly. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, patient compliance and cost of short-term PPI-based triple therapy with those of bismuth-based triple therapy. METHODS: Ninety patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori infection, proven with the 13C-urea breath test and CLO test (Campylobacter-like organism test) were treated randomly in three therapeutic groups: Group A, DeNol 120 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and metronidazole 250 mg four times a day orally for 14 days; Group B, omeprazole 20 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 500 mg four times a day for 14 days; Group C, omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for seven days. Nizatidine 150 mg twice a day was given continuously following the end of anti-H pylori therapy for each group. Two months later, endoscopy, the CLO test and 13C-urea breath test were repeated to assess the eradication rate of H pylori and the ulcer-healing rate. Drug tolerance was evaluated by patients themselves by daily recording of any side-effects. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the entire course of therapy and evaluation for H pylori infection. The H pylori eradication rates in Groups A, B and C were 75% (21/28), 93% (26/28) and 89% (25/28), respectively (p = 0.466). The ulcer healing rate was 86% (24/28) in Group A and 89% (25/28) in Groups B and C (p = 0.764). A total of 74 patients (88%) were free from symptoms at the end of the triple therapy. Symptom relief was faster in patients with PPI-based triple therapy (Groups B and C) (days 3 and 4) than for patients with bismuth-based triple therapy (day 5). The cost of Group C therapy was lower than that for Groups A and B. There were no major side-effects in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effected for the eradication of H pylori. A therapeutic regime of one week's duration with lower cost, good compliance and mild side-effects may offer a good choice for treatment of duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori infection in clinical practice.     

Prospective, randomized, investigator-blind trial of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment in patients with refractory duodenal ulcers. Healing and long-term relapse rates

In this study, 26 patients with duodenal ulcers refractory to treatment with H2-receptor antagonists for 8-12 weeks were randomly assigned to eight weeks of treatment with colloidal bismuth subcitrate (120 mg four times a day) alone (N = 12) or in combination with tetracycline hydrochloride (500 mg four times a day, days 0-14) and metronidazole (500 mg three times a day, days 15-28). Symptoms were scored and endoscopy, histology, and CLO tests were performed before, on completion of treatment, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Treatment was considered successful when Helicobacter pylori was not detected by CLO tests and Warthin-Starry stains on gastric biopsies taken from antrum, body, and fundus. On triple therapy, ulcers healed in 12/14 patients (85.71%) and 10/14 (71.42%) patients became Helicobacter pylori-negative. On bismuth, only one patient became Helicobacter pylori-negative (8.33%, P < 0.0001), but ulcers healed in 8/12 patients (67%, P = NS). Six patients on bismuth, whose ulcers remained unhealed or relapsed early after healing, were offered triple therapy, which resulted in ulcer healing in three and Helicobacter pylori clearance in two patients. At 18 months, none of the Helicobacter pylori-negative patients had ulcer relapse. On the contrary, ulcers relapsed in all but one patient, who remained Helicobacter pylori-positive. Smoking and drinking did not influence the therapeutic outcome. The data confirm previous reports that many duodenal ulcers are infectious and therefore curable.     

A comparison of 10 and 14 days of lansoprazole triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Data from large, multicenter, US studies determining the efficacy of triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori are lacking, especially for a treatment duration of less than 14 days. METHODS: Patients with H pylori infection and active duodenal ulcer disease or a history of duodenal ulcer disease within the past year were randomized to receive 30 mg of lansoprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin twice daily for 10 or 14 days. The primary efficacy end point was the eradication of H pylori as confirmed by negative histological and culture results at 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: Of 284 patients enrolled in the study from 46 US sites, 236 met the entry criteria. At 4 to 6 weeks after the end of therapy, H pylori was eradicated in 85% (96/ 113) of the patients receiving 14-day triple therapy and in 84% (103/123) of those receiving 10-day triple therapy by per-protocol analysis (95% confidence interval for treatment group differences, -10.5 to 8.1; P>.05). There was also no significant difference between the 14- and 10-day treatment groups when analyzed by an intent-to-treat analysis of H pylori eradication. A similar proportion of patients in each treatment group reported an adverse event related to therapy (34% [46/136] vs 38% [56/148], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an active or a recent history of duodenal ulcer, lansoprazole-based triple therapy for 10 or 14 days is highly effective in the eradication of H pylori. The duration of therapy may be reduced from 14 to 10 days without a significant effect on regimen efficacy.     

Omeprazole/amoxicillin versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: two-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study

The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy and dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients and to evaluate the long-term clinical course of ulcer disease. Forty duodenal ulcer patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled into the study and randomly treated with either triple therapy consisting of bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole and tetracycline plus ranitidine or with dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxicillin. Patients were investigated clinically and endoscopically including assessment of H. pylori infection by means or rapid urease test, culture, histology and urea breath testing 4 weeks after cessation of eradication therapy, in 1-year intervals and when dyspeptic symptoms recurred. One patient of each group was lost during follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured by triple therapy in 84.2% and by dual therapy in 78.9% (p = 1.00). During follow-up, all patients with cure of H. pylori infection (n = 31) remained in stable remission with respect to duodenal ulcer disease, while 6 out of 7 patients persistently infected with H. pylori developed an ulcer relapse (p < 0.001). One patient with cured infection had had an episode of dyspeptic symptoms requiring pharmacotherapy and in another 3 patients mild refluxesophagitis without necessity of medical treatment had been detected on the occasion of a scheduled endoscopy. In the short-term, cure of the infection resulted in a marked reduction of the degree of antral gastritis and in a loss of activity in all but one patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Roxatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blind controlled multicentre study in Singapore

Roxatidine acetate, a new H2 receptor antagonist, was compared with ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers in a double-blind multicentre study. Eighty-four patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 150 mg roxatidine acetate or 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime. Repeat endoscopy was performed after 4 weeks (25-33 days) and if the ulcer had not healed, another endoscopy was performed after a further 4 weeks of treatment. Using per protocol analysis 73.6% of ulcers treated with roxatidine healed at 4 weeks compared to 72.2% of ulcers treated with ranitidine (P = NS). The healing rates at 8 weeks were 92% with roxatidine and 83.3% with ranitidine (P = NS). Using equivalence tests, the healing rate of roxatidine was found to be equivalent to that of ranitidine within a 20% region. Roxatidine users took significantly less antacids than ranitidine users (P < 0.05). There were no significant adverse effects due to roxatidine or ranitidine. Roxatidine is a safe effective drug in the treatment of duodenal ulcers with a healing rate comparable to that of ranitidine.     

Non-verbal communication: evaluation of a computer-assisted learning package

To assess the effect of 4 weeks' therapy with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily on the healing of symptomatic NSAID-associated gastric and duodenal ulcers, 149 arthritic patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: ranitidine with NSAID continued, ranitidine with NSAID discontinued, and placebo with NSAID discontinued. The healing frequency in patients with gastric ulceration was 67, 68 and 47%, and in those with duodenal ulceration 61, 81 and 42%, respectively. Only the difference between the duodenal ulcer healing rates for ranitidine with NSAID discontinued and placebo was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Healing rates were uninfluenced by gender, age, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, ulcer frequency or size, arthritic disease, or participating country.     

CT in Fournier''s gangrene

BACKGROUND: Few outcome studies directly compare Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with maintenance H2-antagonist therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. AIM: To examine prospectively the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy with ranitidine maintenance therapy over 1 year in patients with confirmed chronic duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with active H. pylori infection were randomized to receive ranitidine, 150 mg/day initially (58 patients), or omeprazole, 40 mg/day, amoxycillin 2 g/day and metronidazole 1.2 g/day for 14 days, or omeprazole 40 mg/day and clarithromycin 1.5 g/day, for 14 days (if penicillin-allergic). Symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale (GSRS) and SF36 quality of life index. RESULTS: 13C urea breath testing confirmed overall treatment success in 100% of patients (58/58) per protocol and 95.1% (58/61) on an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 and 12 months there were no differences in any GSRS symptoms between treatment groups. SF36 analysis showed a perceived health improvement at 4 and 12 months in patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, despite successful H. pylori eradication, one-fifth of patients still required antisecretory therapy. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, chronic duodenal ulcer patients were at least as well symptomatically as when taking maintenance ranitidine. They perceived that their health had improved, but a subgroup was still acid-suppression dependent.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing with daily lansoprazole, plus 1 or 2 weeks co-therapy with amoxycillin and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor based combination therapy is one standard strategy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the eradication and duodenal ulcer healing efficacy of two 2-week, single dose, lansoprazole based combination therapies. METHODS: Healthy adult patients with endoscopically confirmed, H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease (3 mm > ulcer < 20 mm) were eligible for the study. All patients received a 14 day course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., and were randomized to receive either 7 or 14 days of amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Patients were endoscoped at entry and 14-17 days later. Symptomatic, unhealed patients received a further 14 days of therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. Eradication was confirmed a minimum of 28 days after cessation of all therapy by urease reaction and histological assessment of gastric body and antral biopsies (three biopsies each site). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to a treatment arm, of which 58 could be included in an intention-to-treat and key-point-available analysis. H. pylori eradication rates were identical, at 93% (95% CI: 73-98% (1 week), 78-99% (2 week)). In the combined group, all but 13 ulcers were healed at 2 weeks; six required further therapy because of symptoms, while six of the seven asymptomatic patients went on to heal. CONCLUSION: An eradication regimen, based on a 2-week course of single dose lansoprazole with 1 week of antibiotic co-therapy, is effective in eradicating H. pylori, while the 2 weeks of acid suppression is usually effective in duodenal ulcer healing.     

One-week therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole or ornidazole, followed by 3 weeks' treatment with omeprazole, eradicates Helicobacter pylori equally and heals duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the efficacy of 'triple' 1-week regimens--omeprazole, clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (metronidazole or ornidazole)--followed by omeprazole, for an additional 3 weeks, on Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer (DU) healing, in a country with a high resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole. DESIGN: Open, prospective, two-centre study. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with active duodenal ulcer (DU), diagnosed by endoscopy and found to be infected with H. pylori (modified Giemsa stain and CLO test, Delta West, Australia), were included in the study. Three triple-drug regimens, given for 7 days, were used. (1) omeprazole (Om) 20 mg once a day, plus clarithromycin (Cl) 250 mg twice daily, plus ornidazole (Or) 500 mg twice daily (O1COr); (2) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus Or 500 mg twice daily (OCOr); and (3) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus metronidazole (M) 500 mg twice daily (OCM). Two hundred and three consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were included in the study, randomly assigned as follows: 50 patients (group A1: 32 men, 18 women, age 23-77 years) on O1COr; 47 patients (group A2: 29 men, 18 women, age 27-77 years) on OCOr; and 106 (group B: 71 men, 35 women, age 18-83 years) on OCM. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed endoscopically, 8-9 weeks after the start of treatment. H. pylori was considered eradicated if both histology and rapid urease test (six biopsies, antrum-body) were negative. RESULTS: Eleven patients were lost to follow-up; 192 patients were analysed. Group A1: 48; group A2: 44; group B: 100. 'Per-protocol' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 90-93% (P = 0.901); ulcer healing, 90-98% (P = 0.300). 'Intention to treat' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 85-88% (P = 0.887); ulcer healing, 86-91% (P = 0.657). Compliance was excellent, no serious side effects were observed and no patients withdrew due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the H. pylori eradication and the healing rate among the groups. It seems that twice daily omeprazole is no better than single daily dosage and that ornidazole is as effective as metronidazole. In addition, in the studied population which is believed to have a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, all the regimens used were effective.     

Short-term low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection has been achieved using various therapy regimens, but the efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor pantoprazole as part of these regimens has not yet been widely tested. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 1-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer. METHODS: In an open single-centre prospective study, 71 patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection received pantoprazole 40 mg o.m. for 4 weeks, and during the first week a combination antimicrobial treatment comprising tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. H. pylori eradication was defined as concordant negative histology and rapid urease test performed at endoscopy 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment, confirmed 4 weeks later by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (93%) completed the trial and five patients were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured in 61 out of the 66 patients who completed the trial (per-protocol analysis: 92.4%, 95% CI: 83.2-97.5%; intention-to-treat analysis: 85.9%, 95% CI: 75.7-93.0%). At final endoscopy, 65 out of 66 patients had healed ulcer (98.5%). Mild adverse events occurred in six patients (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: One-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy is a simple, effective and well-tolerated regimen for ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

Inter-rater reliability for function and strength measurements in the acute care hospital after elective hip and knee arthroplasty

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of daily low-dose colloidal bismuth subcitrate in reducing duodenal ulcer relapse. DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy group comparative clinical trial with random allocation. Healing Phase: colloidal bismuth subcitrate 240 mg twice daily vs ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for up to 12 weeks. Maintenance Phase: nightly, colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg vs ranitidine 150 mg vs placebo for up to 12 months (high-risk patients received active treatment only). Assessment: clinical, endoscopy, random blood bismuth levels (and rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori in a subgroup). PATIENTS: 194 with active duodenal ulcer. OUTCOME: Cumulative healing at 12 weeks was 93% on colloidal bismuth subcitrate (of 92 patients) and 97% on ranitidine (of 102 patients). Relapse at 1 year was significantly less on active treatment as follows: placebo (50 patients) 60%; ranitidine (71 patients) 21%; colloidal bismuth subcitrate (64 patients) 33%. This was independent of the results of the rapid urease test which was positive in 78%, 88% and 76% of the patients respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. The highest median blood bismuth level (mcg/L) was 25 in the healing phase and fluctuated between 6 and 10 in the maintenance phase. CONCLUSIONS: Colloidal bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg nightly, is effective in reducing duodenal ulcer relapse and is well tolerated.     

One-week low-dose triple therapy vs. two-week medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our study is to compare a short-term low-dose triple therapy with a long-term medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms, with H.pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups with different therapeutic regimens: A) omeprazole 20 mg/day for 7 days, tinidazole 500 mg bid for 7 days, clarithromycin 250 mg bid for 7 days (55 pts, 20 with peptic ulcer); B) omeprazole 20 mg bid for 14 days, amoxycillin 1000 mg bid for 14 days (55 pts, 28 with peptic ulcer). The "H.pylori status" was evaluated by means of histology, culture and urease test, at entry and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Two group A and one group B pts didn't complete the treatment. The H.pylori eradication was obtained in 38 pts of group A (71.69%) (C.I.95%: 55.19176-80.86293), in 31 of group B (58.49%) (C.I.95%: 42.32777-69.7017); on Intention-to-Treat analysis, the rate of eradication gave similar results. Side effects occurred in 9 pts of group A (16.98%), in 8 of group B (14.81%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term low-dose triple therapy with omeprazole/tinidazole/clarithromycin has a better cost/benefit ratio than long-term dual therapy with omeprazole/amoxycillin in the H.pylori eradication, but it causes more side-effects.     

Improvement of glucose/insulin metabolism reduces hypertension in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation

OBJECTIVE: The current guidelines recommend 1-wk triple therapy regimens for eradicating H. pylori infection. Until now, shorter regimens have scarcely been investigated. Azithromycin is a new generation macrolide antibiotic with unusual and favorable pharmacokinetics, and seems to be a very promising agent for innovative anti-H. pylori regimens. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of a new 4-day low dose triple therapy in comparison with a well established 1-wk triple therapy in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred-sixty consecutive patients with biopsy-proven H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. on days 1-4, azithromycin 500 mg u.i.d. on days 2-4, and tinidazole 2000 mg u.i.d. on day 3 (LAT group), or 7 days of triple therapy of omeprazole 20 mg u.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (OCT group). Patients with gastric or duodenal active ulcer received proton pump inhibitors for an additional 4 wk. H. pylori eradication was defined as negative of both rapid urease test and histology on biopsies taken from the gastric body and antrum at least 1 month after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients in the LAT group and four in the OCT group were lost to follow-up. No significant difference in either efficacy or tolerability was observed between the two regimens. Active ulcers healed in 97.8% of cases with LAT and in 100% of cases with OCT. The eradication rate was 80.8% in the LAT group and 85.5% in the OCT group, considering the per-protocol results, and 73.3% and 81.2%, respectively, considering the intention-to-treat results. Side effects occurred in one LAzT patient and in two OCT patients; they were mild and did not interfere with compliance. CONCLUSION: The new proposed ultrashort triple therapy, including lansoprazole, low dose azithromycin for 3 days, and a single dose of tinidazole, appears to be a very effective anti-H. pylori regimen, a simpler, cheaper, well-tolerated, and equally effective alternative to 1-wk triple therapy.     

Midazolam improves postoperative epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND: A number of triple drug regimens using proton pump inhibitors and two antibiotics have been evaluated in the West and reported to achieve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of over 90%. In developing countries however, these combinations have neither been well evaluated, nor the optimum treatment for H. pylori infection well defined. AIM: To compare the combination of a proton pump inhibitor with a nitroimidazole and another antibiotic in eradicating H. pylori infection and healing duodenal ulcer. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer who were positive for H. pylori (by rapid urease test and 14C-urea breath test) were randomized into three treatments groups: (1) LAS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks; (2) LCS (n=18): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 1 week; (3) LPS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., pefloxacin 400 mg o.m. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks. Urease and breath tests were performed at 0, 6 and 12 weeks to check for H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rates were as follows: LAS 86%, LCS 83%, LPS 71%; the overall ulcer healing rate was 90% at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: High H. pylori eradication rates were achieved using the amoxycillin- and clarithromycin-based therapies. Fewer side-effects, better compliance and low cost favoured the amoxycillin-based therapy.