Lateral Behavior of Pile Groups in Layered Soils

Assessment of the response of a laterally loaded pile group based on soil–pile interaction is presented in this paper. The behavior of a pile group in uniform and layered soil (sand and/or clay) is evaluated based on the strain wedge model approach that was developed to analyze the response of a long flexible pile under lateral loading. Accordingly, the pile’s response is characterized in terms of three-dimensional soil–pile interaction which is then transformed into its one-dimensional beam on elastic foundation equivalent and the associated parameter (modulus of subgrade reaction Es) variation along pile length. The interaction among the piles in a group is determined based on the geometry and interaction of the mobilized passive wedges of soil in front of the piles in association with the pile spacing. The overlap of shear zones among the piles in the group varies along the length of the pile and changes from one soil layer to another in the soil profile. Also, the interaction among the piles grows with the increase in lateral loading, and the increasing depth and fan angles of the developing wedges. The value of Es so determined accounts for the additional strains (i.e., stresses) in the adjacent soil due to pile interaction within the group. Based on the approach presented, the p–y curve for different piles in the pile group can be determined. The reduction in the resistance of the individual piles in the group compared to the isolated pile is governed by soil and pile properties, level of loading, and pile spacing.     

Simplified Lateral Load Analyses of Fixed-Head Piles and Pile Groups

The characteristic load method (CLM) can be used to estimate lateral deflections and maximum bending moments in single fixed-head piles under lateral load. However, this approach is limited to cases where the lateral load on the pile top is applied at the ground surface. When the pile top is embedded, as in most piles that are capped, the additional embedment results in an increased lateral resistance. A simple approach to account for embedment effects in the CLM is presented for single fixed-head piles. In practice, fixed-head piles are more typically used in groups where the response of an individual pile can be influenced through the adjacent soil by the response of other nearby piles. This pile–soil–pile interaction results in larger deflections and moments in pile groups for the same load per pile compared to single piles. A simplified procedure to estimate group deflections and moments was also developed based on the p-multiplier approach. Group amplification factors are introduced to amplify the single pile deflection and bending moment to reflect pile–soil–pile interaction. The resulting approach lends itself well to simple spreadsheet computations and provides good agreement with other generally accepted analytical tools and with values measured in published lateral load tests on groups of fixed-head piles.     

Soil–Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. I: Field Test

Two full-scale experiments using controlled blasting were conducted in the Port of Tokachi on Hokkaido Island, Japan, to assess the behavior of a single pile, a four-pile group, and a nine-pile group subjected to lateral spreading. The test piles were extensively instrumented with strain gauges to measure the distribution of bending moment during lateral spreading which allowed the backcalculation of the loading conditions, as well as the assessment of damage and performance of the piles. Based on the test results, it was concluded that using controlled blasting successfully liquefied the soil, and subsequently induced lateral spreading in the 4–6% surface slope test beds. The free-field soil displacements in the vicinity of the test piles were over 40 cm for both tests. When compared with the results from the single pile case, the effect of pile head restraint from the pile cap improved overall pile performance by decreasing the displacement of the pile groups and lowering the maximum moments in individual piles within each group. Finally, backcalculated soil reactions indicated that the liquefied soil layer imparted insignificant force to the piles. In the companion to this paper (Part II), an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading is presented.     

Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction of Bridge Substructure Subject to Vessel Impact

The paper describes the in situ investigation, site stratigraphy, field monitoring, data reduction, and subsequent time-domain analysis of soil–structure interaction from a full scale vessel impact loading of a bridge pier at the St. George Island Causeway. The in situ investigation included standard penetration testing, electric cone, dilatometer, and pressuremeter testing to identify soil stratigraphy, engineering properties (strength and moduli), and axial and lateral static pile resistance (T–z, and P–y). Field instrumentation included soil total stress and pore pressure gauges in front of and behind the pile cap, a fully instrumented pile (strain gauges along length), dynamic load cells to monitor barge impact loads, and accelerometers to monitor pier accelerations, velocities, and displacements. Analyses of the field data reveal significant dynamic forces within the soil–structure system as a result of the duration and magnitude of the loading. Inertia from the piers, cap, and piles provide significant resistance in the early portion of the impact. However, postpeak inertia (i.e., pier deceleration) resulted in maximum deformations of the pier. Soil damping provided most of the resisting force at the peak barge loading, whereas static soil resistance dominated at the peak lateral displacement. Time-domain finite element analysis of an impact event employing viscous soil dashpots, nonlinear P–y and T–z springs with nonlinear beam, and shell elements for the pier, cap, and piles resulted in reasonable load displacement predictions.     

Drag Force on Single Piles in Clay Subjected to Surcharge Loading

Piles driven into clay are often subjected to indirect loading as a result of the surcharge applied on the surrounding area. During the drained period, both the piles and the soil undergo downward movements caused by the axial and the surcharge loading, respectively. Depending on the relative movement of the pile–soil system, positive and negative skin friction develop on the pile’s shaft. Negative skin friction is the drag force that may be large enough to reduce the pile capacity and/or to overstress the pile’s material causing fractures or perhaps structural failure of the pile, and/or possibly pulling out the pile from the cap. A numerical model that uses the finite element technique combined with the soil responses according to Mohr–Coulomb criteria was developed for case simulation. The computer program CRISP (developed by Cambridge University) was used in this study. The numerical model was first tested against the results predicted by the bearing capacity theories for pile foundations in clay subjected to axial loading. Upon achieving satisfactory results, the numerical model was then used to generate data for piles subjected to surcharge loading. The predicted values were compared well with the field data and the empirical formulae available in the literature. Based on the results of the present investigation, design charts and procedures are presented to predict the location of the neutral plane and to estimate the drag force acting on the pile’s shaft for a given pile–soil–loading conditions. In the case of excessive drag force, coating the pile’s shaft with a thin layer of bitumen is advisable to eliminate or minimize the drag force. The design procedure presented herein would provide the means to establish the need and the extent of the pile coating. Furthermore, it demonstrates the role of the factor of safety on both pile capacity and the depth of the neutral plane.     

Application of Periodic Boundary for Large Pile Group

Full-scale testing of a large pile group is economically not feasible. A concept based on a periodic boundary has been used to study lateral behavior of a large pile group. The approach and findings from anchorage design of a major suspension bridge in California are presented here. Using the repeating nature of soil's displacement field within infinite number of piles arranged in a regular grid pattern, soil-pile interaction phenomenon from the finite area enclosed by one periodic soil boundary effectively represents behavior of the entire pile group. A 3D finite-element analysis was used to create the soil-pile models in which the boundary conditions mimic the repeating nature of the infinite number of piles by slaving the boundary nodes. The soil resistance, as calculated from the finite-element method employing the periodic boundary, is compared with the empirical p-y curve approach for a single isolated pile to determine the group effects. Values of p-multiplier and y-multiplier have been obtained for different pile spacings.     

Simplified Approach for the Seismic Response of a Pile Foundation

Pseudostatic approaches for the seismic analysis of pile foundations are attractive for practicing engineers because they are simple when compared to difficult and more complex dynamic analyses. To evaluate the internal response of piles subjected to earthquake loading, a simplified approach based on the “p-y” subgrade reaction method has been developed. The method involves two main steps: first, a site response analysis is carried out to obtain the free-field ground displacements along the pile. Next, a static load analysis is carried out for the pile, subjected to the computed free-field ground displacements and the static loading at the pile head. A pseudostatic push over analysis is adopted to simulate the behavior of piles subjected to both lateral soil movements and static loadings at the pile head. The single pile or the pile group interact with the surrounding soil by means of hyperbolic p-y curves. The solution derived first for the single pile, was extended to the case of a pile group by empirical multipliers, which account for reduced resistance and stiffness due to pile-soil-pile interaction. Numerical results obtained by the proposed simplified approach were compared with experimental and numerical results reported in literature. It has been shown that this procedure can be used successfully for determining the response of a pile foundation to “inertial” loading caused by the lateral forces imposed on the superstructure and “kinematic” loading caused by the ground movements developed during an earthquake.     

A Robust Macroelement Model for Soil–Pile Interaction under Cyclic Loads

The principal focus of this study is the development of a robust macroelement model for soil–pile interaction under cyclic loads. The model incorporates frictional forces and formation of gaps at the soil–pile interface as well as hysteretic behavior of the soil. The plastic envelope of the soil behavior is modeled via the so-called p–y approach, outlined in American Petroleum Institute’s guidelines for design of foundation piles for offshore platforms. The macroelement is an intuitive assembly of various basic elements, each of which incorporating a particular aspect of the soil–pile interaction. The modular structure of this macroelement allows straightforward adaptation of improved constitutive models for its building blocks. Herein, we focus on large-diameter, cast-in-drilled-hole reinforced concrete piles (piers) that are partially or fully embedded in soil. These types of piles are frequently used as support structures in highway construction. Consequently, the numerical robustness of the interaction model is assessed with parametric studies on pile systems and soil types relevant to this type of construction. Both elastic and inelastic pile behaviors are considered in the parametric studies. The results indicate that the proposed interaction element is numerically robust, and thus, amenable to routine structural analysis.     

Failure Mechanisms of Pile Foundations in Liquefiable Soil: Parametric Study

This paper presents the response of piles in liquefiable soil under seismic loads. The effects of soil, pile, and earthquake parameters on the two potential pile failure mechanisms, bending and buckling, are examined. The analysis is conducted using a two-dimensional plain strain finite difference program considering a nonlinear constitutive model for soil liquefaction, strength reduction, and pile-soil interaction. The depths of liquefaction, maximum lateral displacement, and maximum pile bending moment are obtained for concrete and steel piles for different soil relative densities, pile diameters, earthquake predominant frequencies, and peak accelerations. The potential failure mechanisms of piles identified from the parametric analysis are discussed.     

Load Transfer Curves along Bored Piles Considering Modulus Degradation

The load-transfer (or t-z) curve, which reflects the interaction between a pile and the surrounding soil, is important for evaluating the load-settlement response of a pile subjected to an axial load using the load-transfer method. Preferably, the nonlinear stress-strain behavior of the soil should be incorporated into the t-z curve. This paper presents a practical approach for the estimation of t-z curves along bored piles by considering the nonlinear elastic properties and modulus degradation characteristics of the soil. A method for evaluating the modulus degradation curve from the results of a pressuremeter test is proposed. The results of load tests on one instrumented bored pile in Piedmont residual soil in Atlanta and another in the residual soil of the Jurong Formation in Singapore provide verification of the validity of the proposed approach.     

Permanent Strains of Piles in Sand due to Cyclic Lateral Loads

The strain superposition concept, proposed for ballast study, is applied here to evaluate strain accumulation for laterally loaded piles in sand. It is shown that the soil properties, types of pile installation, cyclic loading types, pile embedded length, and pile∕soil relative stiffness ratio are important factors that influence the pile behavior under mixed lateral loads. These factors are quantified by means of a degradation factor, t, which is derived from the results of 20 full-scale pile load tests and then verified using 6 additional full-scale pile load tests.     

Behavior of Slender Piles Subject to Free-Field Lateral Soil Movement

Soil movements associated with slope instability induce shear forces and bending moments in stabilizing piles that vary with the buildup of passive pile resistance. For such free-field lateral soil movements, stress development along the pile element is a function of the relative displacement between the soil and the pile. To investigate the effects of relative soil-pile displacement on pile response, large-scale load tests were performed on relatively slender, drilled, composite pile elements (cementitious grout with centered steel reinforcing bar). The piles were installed through a shear box into stable soil and then loaded by lateral translation of the shear box. The load tests included two pile diameters (nominal 115 and 178?mm) and three cohesive soil types (loess, glacial till, and weathered shale). Instrumentation indicated the relative soil-pile displacements and the pile response to the loads that developed along the piles. Using the experimental results, an analysis approach was evaluated using soil p-y curves derived from laboratory undrained shear strength tests. The test piles and analyses helped characterize behavioral stages of the composite pile elements at loads up to pile section failure and also provided a unique dataset to evaluate the lateral response analysis method for its applicability to slender piles.     

Cyclic Lateral Load Behavior of a Pile Cap and Backfill

A series of static cyclic lateral load tests were performed on a full-scale 4×3 pile group driven into a cohesive soil profile. Twelve 324-mm steel pipe piles were attached to a concrete pile cap 5.18×3.05?m in plan and 1.12?m in height. Pile–soil–pile interaction and passive earth pressure provided lateral resistance. Seven lateral load tests were conducted in total; four tests with backfill compacted in front of the pile cap; two tests without backfill; and one test with a narrow trench between the pile cap and backfill soil. The formation of gaps around the piles at larger deflections reduced the pile–soil–pile interaction resulting in a degraded linear load versus deflection response that was very similar for the two tests without backfill and the trenched test. A typical nonlinear backbone curve was observed for the backfill tests. However, for deflections greater than 5 mm, the load-deflection behavior significantly changed from a concave down shape for the first cycle to a concave up shape for the second and subsequent cycles. The concave up shape continued to degrade with additional cycles past the second and typically became relatively constant after five to seven cycles. A gap formed between the backfill soil and the pile cap, which contributed to the load-deflection degradation. Crack patterns and sliding surfaces were consistent with that predicted by the log spiral theory. The results from this study indicate that passive resistance contributes considerably to the lateral resistance. However, with cyclic loading the passive force degrades significantly for deflections greater than 0.5% of the pile cap height.     

Simple Energy-Based Method for Nonlinear Analysis of Incompressible Pile Groups in Clays

This note presents a method for predicting nonlinear response of pile groups in clays, subjected to vertical loads. The method is based on mobilizable strength design (MSD) concepts, in which the mobilized strength is associated with the shear strains developed in the soil. The suggested procedure is incremental, and requires evaluation of a displacement field. A simple procedure of superposition of pattern functions is suggested for the construction of a complete displacement field. The incremental procedure allows for the variation of the displacement field throughout the loading process, according to principles of minimum energy and compatibility requirements among the piles. Essentially, the procedure allows consideration of a nonlinear continuum between the piles. The pattern functions are an adaptive form of the logarithmic function suggested by Randolph and Wroth in 1979. Under small load levels, when the soil is essentially elastic, the procedure yields values comparable to those from the elastic solution of Randolph and Wroth. At larger strain levels, nonlinear pile group response is simulated based on the soil constitutive models specified by the practitioner. The method is applicable to cases where shaft loading does not induce volume changes in the soil. The method is compared with three dimensional finite difference simulation of undrained loading of pile groups with a nonlinear soil constitutive model. Fair agreement is observed.     

Pile Responses Caused by Tunneling

In this paper, a two-stage approach is used to analyze the lateral and axial responses of piles caused by tunneling. First, free-field soil movements are estimated based on an analytical method, and, second, these estimated soil movements are imposed on the pile in simplified boundary element analyses to compute the pile responses. Through a parametric study, it is shown that the influence of tunneling on pile response depends on a number of factors, including tunnel geometry, ground loss ratio, soil strength, pile diameter, and ratio of pile length to tunnel cover depth. Simple design charts are presented for estimating maximum pile responses and may be used in practice to assess the behavior of existing piles adjacent to tunneling operations. A published case history has been studied in which the measured lateral pile deflections are compared with those computed using the present method and fair agreement is found.     

Construction Effect on Load Transfer along Bored Piles

The load transfer behavior along bored piles is affected by details of pile construction particularly those imposing stress and moisture changes to the surrounding soils. An investigation involving moisture migration tests, in situ horizontal stress measurements, and borehole shear and pressuremeter tests shows clear effects of construction that lead to subsequent changes in soil properties. The construction of bored piles in Singapore and the region often involves casting of concrete either in unsupported “dry” boreholes or in “wet” boreholes filled with water. It is necessary to differentiate these two extreme construction conditions in bored pile design. Based on triaxial compression and pressuremeter tests on the residual soil of the Jurong Formation in Singapore, the variation of soil modulus with shear strain can be described by a hyperbolic function. A procedure is recommended for assessing the combined effect of stress relief and soaking on soil modulus by introducing a modulus reduction factor. Modulus degradation curves from pressuremeter tests with the borehole conditions properly simulated are found capable of producing load transfer curves that are comparable to those deduced in the field.     

Time-Dependent Response of an Axially Loaded Elastic Bar in a Multilayered Poroelastic Medium

This paper considers load transfer from an axially loaded long elastic bar into a multilayered poroelastic half-space. The problem is analyzed by decomposing the bar-half-space system into an extended half-space governed by Biot’s theory of poroelasticity and a one-dimensional fictitious bar. The interaction problem is formulated in the Laplace transform domain. Vertical displacement of the bar is approximated by an exponential series with a set of arbitrary functions. The arbitrary functions are determined by using a variational method. The vertical displacement influence function of a multilayered half-space subjected to a buried uniform vertical patch load is required in the variational formulation. The required influence function is obtained by employing a previously developed exact stiffness matrix method. Time domain solutions are computed by using a numerical Laplace inversion scheme. Selected numerical results are presented to portray the influence of the bar length–radius ratio, layer configuration, poroelastic material parameters, and loading time history on the time dependent response of a bar.     

Soil-Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. II: Analysis and Assessment of the p–y Method

This paper presents an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading. The computed responses were compared with the results from the full-scale lateral spreading tests in Japan as presented in the Part I companion paper. The responses of the single piles subjected to lateral spreading were determined by imposing the known free-field soil movement profile to the Winkler spring model. The soil springs of nonliquefied soils used in this study were based upon standard p–y springs whereas zero spring stiffness was used for liquefied soils. For the case of pile groups, they were modeled as an equivalent single pile with a rotational spring at the pile head to simulate effect of pile head restraint. A decrease of soil spring stiffnesses using the p-multiplier approach was used to account for pile group effects. Based on the results of analyses, the computed responses of all sets of the test piles using a single set of baseline soil properties were in good agreement with the measured responses. These results suggest that the p–y analysis method may be used to estimate the behavior of piles subjected to lateral spreading.     

Seismic Behavior of Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Soils: Parametric Study

Nonlinearity of the soil medium plays a very important role on the seismic behavior of soil-pile-structure interaction. The problem of soil-pile-structure interaction is further complicated when the piles are embedded in liquefiable soil medium. A finite-element code was developed in MATLAB to model three-dimensional soil-pile-structure systems. Frequency dependent Kelvin elements (spring and dashpots) were used to model the radiation boundary conditions. A work-hardening plastic cap model was used for constitutive modeling of the soil medium. The pore pressure generation for liquefaction was incorporated by a two-parameter volume change model reported in the literature. In this paper, a 2×2 pile group in liquefiable soil is considered and a parametric study is conducted to investigate its seismic behavior. The effects of loading intensity and stiffness of the soil on the seismic behaviour of the soil-pile system are investigated, considering nonlinearity and liquefaction of the soil medium for a wide range of frequencies of harmonic excitations. The inertial interaction attributable to a structure is analyzed for a system consisting of a four-storied portal frame on the pile group-soil subsystem. The responses of the structure are investigated for harmonic excitation and transient excitations. The importance of consideration of nonlinearity and liquefaction of the soil medium for analysis and design of a pile-supported structure is highlighted. Results from an analysis considering a practical soil-pile problem are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the developed algorithm for a practical problem.     

Nonlinear Interaction of Soil–Pile in Horizontal Vibration

This paper presents a new model for analyzing a nonlinear soil–pile interaction subject to horizontal shaking of a vertical circular pile embedded in a soil layer of finite thickness. The pile rests on bedrock with either a pinned or a clamped support. The soil mass is assumed composing of a “semi-nonlinear” inner soil zone around the pile and a linear viscoelastic soil zone outside the inner zone. When the inner soil behaves linearly, the present solutions are identical to those obtained by Nogami and Novak in 1977. Numerical results show that soil resistance of less slender piles developed against the vibration is larger than that of more slender piles. Soil resistance depends more strongly on the size of the nonlinear inner zone when the pile is vibrating at a frequency higher than the natural frequency of the soil. Soil nonlinearity, in general, results in a smaller damping and stiffness of the soil–pile system, except at high frequency. At higher vibration frequency, the situation can be very complicated. The exact value of the dynamic stiffness of the soil–pile system depends on elastic shear wave speed, soil nonlinearity, vibration frequency, slenderness ratio of the pile, magnitude of vibration, and tip conditions of the pile. Generally speaking, the dynamic stiffness is smaller than the static stiffness. The normalized dynamic stiffness for pile with a pinned tip is, in general, larger than that with a clamped tip, while the reverse is true for the damping.